Sign in

Gilad Feldman

@giladfeldman.bsky.social
3.5K followers 3.3K following 633 posts

Social psychology, judgment & decision-making/behavioral economics, agency, & action. Open/meta science. (Peer Community in) Registered Reports, mass replications, & meta-analyses. mgto.org/resume-cv

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 12h
Third, a Psychology of Science Hub collaboration I co-authored: ⚡ Publishing, Incentives, and Conflict: An Action Research Inquiry 📅 Thu, Oct 8 | 10:30–11:25 UTC Sessions have several talks; stay for the whole slot! 🎟️ Register free: bigteamscienceconference.github.io
043
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 12h
⚡ ManyContexts: Measuring the Worlds That Big Team Science Samples 📅 Wed, Oct 7 | 13:00–13:55 UTC ⚡ Invariance Blindness: When Cross-Cultural Inference Outruns Measurement Validity 📅 Thu, Oct 8 | 10:30–11:25 UTC
131
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Björn Brembs @brembs.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 02/10/2026
Mark you calendars: #zurich Wednesday, October 21, 3.30pm, keynote presentation: "Replacing Academic Journals" Open Access Week | Lib4RI www.lib4ri.ch/open-access-week #openaccess #openscience
lib4ri.ch
Open Access Week | Lib4RI
003
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Christoph Strauch @cstrauch.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
How much of a risk are LLM-generated bots for online behavioral experiments? We present results of an entirely natural language prompt-generated agent, capable of absolving any of the 26 experiments we tested it on. Most tasks are passed with data that can pass as human osf.io/preprints/ps... (1/)
27138
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 02/10/2026
📋 Registration Open: BITSS Annual Meeting Share novel research and discuss efforts to improve the credibility of social science by advancing research transparency, reproducibility, rigor, and ethics. BITSS 2027 will be held Feb. 26 in Berkeley, CA. Free to attend. Register:
docs.google.com
2027 BITSS Annual Meeting Registration
The BITSS Annual Meeting brings together actors from academia, scholarly publishing, and policy to share novel research and discuss efforts to improve the credibility of social science by advancing research transparency, reproducibility, rigor, and ethics. The 15th BITSS Annual Meeting will be held on Friday, February 26, 2027 in Berkeley, CA at the Tamalpais Room, Brower Center. Please register for this event by filling out the brief form below. We'll follow up over email with specific instructions for attending the event in early February. This event is free to attend and we also welcome graduate students. NOTE: We cannot sponsor travel or hotel accommodations for the Annual Meeting. Those attending the event in-person must cover their own costs; we have limited travel support available for speakers.
045
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Nicholas A. Coles, PhD @nicholascoles.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
When we fake smiles, are we smiling our way to happiness or misery? 🙃 For decades, emotion embodiment theorists have emphasized happiness boosts -- all while emotion labor theorists emphasized misery costs. In this Registered Report, we finally put these ideas side-by-side doi.org/10.1016/j.je...
1147
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Matti Vuorre @matti.vuorre.com · 01/10/2026
Good talk. There's a lot of (over)thinking of this at the moment. Zenodo just works. (Until it doesn't when we and our bots ruin that as well.) Collaborate on GitHub and refer to zenodo.
2359
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Resource 6: Katie Corker on how to link objects stored elsewhere (e.g., OSF Registry, PsyArXiv) to Zenodo via persistent identifiers (e.g., DOI). (see October 2026 talk, which should automatically load): zenodo.org/records/2307...
zenodo.org
ASAPbio staff presentations
This is a repository for slide decks associated with ASAPbio staff member talks and presentations from 2025 onwards. Slide decks are provided under a CC-BY licence. Please direct any questions pertain...
022
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Resource 5: Amanda Montoya's video explainer on how to use Zenodo, including creating anonymous links: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jW84...
youtube.com
Getting Started with Zenodo (transitioning from OSF Projects)
YouTube video by AMANDA MONTOYA
121
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Gave a talk in my dept. on the OSF transition. I wrote up a rough script of the session, which could be of interest to others. I synthesize existing resources and provide my own perspectives. Comments and corrections welcome! zenodo.org/records/2306...
the header for a paper describing "Life after OSF" #metascience
214872
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Experimental Philosophy @xphilosopher.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
There has been a huge amount of experimental philosophy research on the concept of KNOWLEDGE This research finds that the ordinary concept doesn’t work at all the way philosophers said it does A thread with some examples: 🧵
34315
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Peer Community In @peercommunityin.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
A PCI recommendation can be a valuable part of a publication strategy: · The recommendation and peer-reviews are citable · You participate in open science initiatives · You can publish in the journal of your choice 👉 Explore your publishing options with PCI: peercommunityin.org/submit-a-pre...
peercommunityin.org
Submit a preprint to PCI - Peer Community In
Once an article has been recommended by a PCI, the authors can opt to leave it on a preprint server, to publish it in PCI Journal, to submit it to a PCI-friendly journal or to any other journal
044
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 28/09/2026
🗓️ Reminder: The first OSF Projects transition deadline is 7 weeks away. Starting November 16, 2026, you will no longer be able to create new OSF Projects or add new components to existing projects. (🧵1/3)
OSF projects changes chart
11114
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Metascience 2027 @metascienceconf.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Meet the Metascience 2027 Program Steering Committee! This international group is shaping the program for Metascience 2027 on June 14-16, 2027, in Montreal. 🧵👇 #Metascience2027
Graphic with a dark blue geometric background. At top left is the Metascience 2027 Conference logo, and at top right the title "Program Steering Committee." Below are eight headshots in two rows of four, each with a name and affiliation. Top row: Annabel Seyller, Co-Chair, Tanenbaum Open Science Institute; Vincent Larivière, Co-Chair, Université de Montréal; Dominique Roche, SSHRC-CRSH; Moumita Koley, DST-Centre for Policy Research. Bottom row: Gabriel Pelletier, Tanenbaum Open Science Institute; Emmanuel Boakye, African Reproducibility Network; Kelly Cobey, Ottawa Heart Institute; Tim Errington, Center for Open Science. The sponsor logos for The Neuro Tanenbaum Open Science Institute and the Center for Open Science are along the bottom of the graphic.
11310
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
We did an entire special issue on registered reported with secondary data. There are many others elsewhere as well: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15227219...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Registered Reports with Secondary Developmental Data: Infant and Child Development: Vol 33, No 2
Infant and Child Development: prenatal, childhood, adolescence, emerging adulthood is a premier developmental science journal for transparent and open research.
093
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Ruben C. Arslan @ruben.the100.ci · 11/09/2026
An interesting thing is happening to me at the moment. I have a standing bug bounty policy for my first authored scientific work. That means, I've committed to pay people who report bugs in my code, up to 750€ for severe errors. Since GPT-6 Astra came out, I'm now getting several bug reports daily.
39334
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
We just published a new paper (led by Love von Schreeb) demonstrating how large language models can be used to link published results to trial registrations with very high accuracy! Now out in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - check it out: www.jclinepi.com/article/S089...
jclinepi.com
TrialScout links published results to trial registrations using a large language model
Multiple stakeholders need to locate results of registered clinical trials but frequently struggle to find them. Summary results of clinical trials are often not published in trial registries, and pub...
1187
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Randy Ellis @randalljellis.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Here’s my conversation with Chris Chambers on Metascience Matters. Chris was the first journal editor to offer registered reports, starting in 2013 at Cortex. youtu.be/PgZjgZlxsYw?...
youtu.be
Registered reports | Chris Chambers
YouTube video by Metascience Matters
11912
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
UCD Library @ucdlibrary.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
University Librarian Dr. Sandra Collins will be speaking at the upcoming #AI in Science Summit 2026, held in O'Reilly Hall here at University College Dublin on 15-16 October. Register: www.ais26.eu #AIS26 is part of #EuropeanAIInnovationMonth @ucdresearch.bsky.social @ucdischool.bsky.social
Headshot of Dr. Sandra Collins, University Librarian at UCD. Open Science and Data for Research graphic. AI in Science Summit 15th and 16th of October.
093
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Supramundane Agency @supramundane.agency · 23/09/2026
Institute of Open Science Practices — IOSP 2026 An event for the people building, using, and advancing the infrastructure open science depends on. I’ll be demonstrating work relating to publishing datasets to the Atmosphere. supramundane.agency/2026/1012-iosp-…
supramundane.agency
Institute of Open Science Practices — IOSP 2026
An event for the people building, using, and advancing the infrastructure open science depends on. I’ll be demonstrating work relating to publishing datasets to the Atmosphere.
001
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Maksim Rudnev 🇺🇦 @maksimrudnev.com · 21/09/2026
In case you want to download all your files from OSF, this R script just worked for me gist.github.com/MaksimRudnev... NB! It downloads *only* your files stored on OSF - no preregs, no preprints, no metadata. For complete download of everything, you can follow help.osf.io/article/742-...
gist.github.com
Download every file from your OSF account
Download every file from your OSF account. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
021
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 22/09/2026
🎉 ReproducibiliTea 2026 Conference | 25 September 2026 “A decade on & decades ahead” Lunch Break & Parallel Journal Clubs | 14:10–16:10 CEST Grab a bite and a warm cup of tea, then join us for interactive discussions! ⇆ Both journal clubs run at the same time in separate rooms.
274
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Lionel Page @lionelpage.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
AI is set to change how research is peer reviewed. I discussed about this with Achim Czerny. youtu.be/BI1B-YO8U8A?...
youtu.be
AI vs. peer review — Lionel Page on what breaks and what improves
YouTube video by Achim I. Czerny | Aviation & Maritime Economics
013
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
And if you want to see how your OSF repos compare against this corpus in terms of usability try my OSF reusability checker app. This app also provides tips if it flags any potential issues dsquintana.shinyapps.io/osf-reusabil...
Screenshot of a web app called the OSF Reusability Checker. A panel on the left takes OSF project links or IDs, with a checkbox for "Also inspect code" and a Check button. On the right, results for one project, kd6p8: it contains data or code, is documented, and has retrievable code. A percentile chart shows its 21 downloads at the 10th percentile for projects of its age, 0.2 times what a repository that age typically gets. Below, three bars compare it with published psychology projects: documented (30% of 672 projects) — this repo yes; hard-coded path (34% of 333 with code) — no; loads a missing file (40% of 333 with code) — no. A results table lists 21 downloads, age-adjusted percentile 10, reuse score 4 out of 4, cleanup "clean", and "looks good".Screenshot of one row from the OSF Reusability Checker's results table, for project rxphw (one of mine!). It has 1,558 downloads, placing it at the 98th percentile for repositories of its age, but scores only 2 out of 4 on reuse, with the cleanup verdict "needs data/code added". The "what to fix" column reads: 6 scripts hard-code a file path — use here::here(); 6 missing files, including 3 data files — deposit them, or add a data-availability statement if access is restricted.
1126
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
William Ngiam | 严祥全 @williamngiam.github.io · 19/09/2026
Check out the reusability checker ShinyApp! It's very useful for making sure your data repositories are in good condition before the upcoming read-only freeze of OSF repositories.
041
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
New preprint! 🎉 I analysed 1660 papers from 4 psychology journals and found materials sharing went from 9% of papers in 2015 to 82% in 2025, and these materials *do* get downloaded — a median of 135 times each. BUT shared code is often hard to run. doi.org/10.31234/osf... Let's walk through it 🧵
Two-panel figure. Panel a is a flow diagram tracking 1,611 empirical psychology articles from publication year (545 in 2015, 552 in 2020, 514 in 2025) to repository-link type: 785 link an OSF project, 85 link another platform, and 741 link no repository. Of those with an OSF link, download counts were retrieved for 670 and not retrieved for 115. Panel b is a line chart of the share of empirical papers linking OSF across 2015, 2020 and 2025. The overall rate, shown as a dashed black line, rises from 9% to 57% to 82%. All four journals rise steeply and end close together: Psychological Science 92%, JESP 89%, JML 83%, Cognition 76%, with Psychological Science highest throughout.Three-panel figure. Panel a: ridgeline plot of downloads per file by material type on a log scale, with the percentage never downloaded labelled for each — archive 16% of 545 files, documents 20% of 2,970, code 12% of 3,471, other 17% of 1,646, data 21% of 10,051, media 35% of 2,120, images 35% of 4,102. Most files cluster between 1 and 10 downloads, with long right tails past 100. Panel b: ridgeline plot of downloads per paper by journal, log scale, with dashed median lines; Psychological Science is highest, then JESP, JML and Cognition. Panel c: stacked bars showing, for documents, data and code separately, the share of papers by download band (0, 1–10, 11–100, more than 100) in 2015, 2020 and 2025. The share exceeding 100 downloads falls sharply over time in all three types, from roughly two-thirds in 2015 to a quarter or less in 2025, as the 1–10 band grows.Four-panel figure. Panel a: statistical languages detected among 333 papers with retrievable code — R 88%, SPSS 12%, Stata 4%, SAS 1%. Panel b: code red flags among those 333 papers — 34% hard-code an absolute path, 40% reference a missing file — above documentation among 672 OSF-linked papers — 21% have a README, 30% are documented by README, description or wiki. Panel c: among 562 Elsevier papers with no repository link, 44% (245) host at least one journal supplementary file but only 14% (77) host data, code or an archive. Panel d: composition of those 448 hosted files — documents 52%, data 21%, media 9%, other 7%, archive 6%, code 3%, images 1%. The code panels are green, the journal-supplement panels blue.Coefficient plot (download predictors)

Dot-and-whisker plot of three standardised predictors of OSF download volume, each with a 95% confidence interval. Repository size (number of files) has the largest effect at about 0.76, citations about 0.38, and altmetric attention about 0.12. All three intervals sit entirely above zero, so each predicts more downloads, with repository size roughly twice the effect of citations and six times that of attention. X-axis: standardised effect, −0.2 to 1.0.
4265113
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Come to Münster and work with us on tools to make replications more visible! In the thread are some examples from our past two events.
234
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 17/09/2026
Join an international team in Münster from Nov 11-13 for the Making Replications Count Hackathon—a fully funded, 3-day event dedicated to building tools that make replication studies easier to find and use. Apply by Oct 14 (Oct 5 if you require a visa). More info: indico.uni-muenster.de/e/marco3
indico.uni-muenster.de
Making Replication Count: Fall Hackathon
Join us for a three-day-hackathon to create tools to increase the visibility of replications! Background In the social, behavioral, and cognitive sciences, replications are rarely conducted, difficult...
061
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Bastian Jaeger @bxjaeger.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Now out at EJSP: We explored cultural & individual differences in the hierarchy of moral concern across student samples from 41 cultural groups (n >6500). doi.org/10.1002/ejsp...
165
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
yeah, it's a bad scene, this is now one of my template emails that unfortunately has to exist.
 if you use AI/LLMs to compose email inquiries, please stop.
0303
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Jan van Gemert @jvgemert.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Our fifth workshop on Meta-science for Machine Learning is on Sept 22. metascienceforml.github.io Registration info in the link.
metascienceforml.github.io
Metascience for Machine Learning
A repository for collecting information about Metascience for machine learning.
044
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Emma Wilson @emmawilson.eurosky.social · 14/09/2026
I really appreciate this initiative, and I already peer review for diamond OA journals and am on the editorial board for one, but I think the info on the webpage conflates OA costs (free to read and publish) and other open research values. Not all diamond OA journals are scholar led for instance.
1115
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training @forrt.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Peer review is a gift researchers give to the field, worth >$1B globally in 2020. Imagine if more of that generosity flowed straight back into the scholar-led journals that make research free to read and free to publish. Help build that future, become a diamond reviewer forrt.org/diamond-reviewer
A hexagonal badge with a diamond and the words "diamond reviewer" below it.
22824
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Come join my team at NUS! Working on empirical and experimental studies around public attitudes and psychology around AI, longevity, precision medicine, genomics. Research Fellow (Quantitative Research) careers.nus.edu.sg/job/Research...
careers.nus.edu.sg
Research Fellow (Quantitative Research)
Research Fellow (Quantitative Research)
077
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Simon Columbus @simoncolumbus.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Autumn 2026 Cooperation Colloquia We have an exciting interdisciplinary series of speakers with Kasper Otten, @patkanngiesser.bsky.social, @charlesefferson.bsky.social @nikoletaglyn.bsky.social, Cameron Curtin, & Devesh Rustagi Sign up: list.ku.dk/postorius/li...
List of speakers: 
2026-09-18 | Kasper Otten (WODC / Erasmus University Rotterdam) | The ​co-occurrence of ingroup and outgroup prosociality across 121 societies
2026-10-02 | Patricia Kanngiesser (University of Plymouth)
2026-10-16 | Charles Efferson (Université de Lausanne)
2026-10-30 | Nikoleta Glynatsi (RIKEN Center for Computational Science)
2026-11-13 | Cameron Curtin (IAST)
2026-12-11 | Devesh Rustagi (University of Warwick)
1610
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Two weeks left to sign up for the Meta-Research Symposium 2026 organized by the Paul Meehl Graduate School paulmeehlschool.github.io/2026-08-04-s... If you've attended previous years, you know this is a lovely day full of cutting edge meta-science, and a great opportunity to network.
paulmeehlschool.github.io
Registration Now Open: Meta-Research Symposium 2026 | Paul Meehl Graduate School
We are delighted to announce that registration is now open for the third Paul Meehl Graduate School Meta-Research Symposium! In...
0149
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 10/09/2026
🎉 COS has established an independent subsidiary organization in Brussels! While the Belgian organization is legally independent from COS in the US, it will not operate separately—it's part of one integrated, global COS organization with a shared mission, strategy, & brand
cos.io
A New Chapter for COS in Europe
The Center for Open Science (COS) has officially established an independent subsidiary organization in Brussels, Belgium. This presence gives COS flexibility to engage with European institutions, organizations, funders, and communities.
02815
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
The Metascience Observatory @metascienceobs.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
We ran our simple image duplication detection system on 1,000 papers. The papers 1. have 1 author who has a image-related retraction according to @retractionwatch.com, 2. are not retracted, and 3. have no image-related @pubpeer.com comments. We use AI to screen findings & suppress false pos.. (1/3)
132
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Noah is leading our effort to do a naturalistic randomized trial on a variant of the Registered Reports publishing model. Registered Revisions implements randomization at Revise-and-resubmit stage for new data or analyses. Here's a thread and preprint with the latest.
0115
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Noah Haber @whaleactually.com · 08/09/2026
To estimate its impact, we are doing something out of the box: a "meta trial" Rather than one big trial with a bunch of journals or a hopeful meta-analysis of independent trials, we do a bit of both. One centralized design and infrastructure, but with flexible independent journal-based trials.
141
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Noah Haber @whaleactually.com · 01/09/2026
If you love any of the following, stay tuned for something I am stoked to share in the next few days: * Weird study design * Things super not going to plan * Workflow and infrastructure * Entirely exploratory preregistration * Fun stats/inference issues * Simulations
1203
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Noah Haber @whaleactually.com · 08/09/2026
This report is a little different than what you might be used to. You won't see results or implications (due next year). This is a deep dive into the design and development of the policy, methods, ideas, etc. And most importantly, what didn't go to plan. Which was a lot. bsky.app/profile/whal...
121
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Noah Haber @whaleactually.com · 08/09/2026
... and that's where Registered Revisions comes in The Registered Revisions Meta Trial Pilot Report is OUT NOW!! osf.io/preprints/me... But new(ish) policy involves developing a new(ish) multi-headed trial design, workflows, infrastructure, piloting, mistakes, and a super team. And it's all here.
22117
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Marek Vranka @mvranka.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
this amazing #metasci event (again!) somehow flew under my radar - paulmeehlschool.github.io/workshops/sy... - although submissions are closed, registration is still open, so check it out! (I will squeez my very limited budget and try joining as well!) @youngmetascience.bsky.social
121
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Florian Naudet @floriannaudet.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
🚨 paper alert 🚨 « Open Science Policies and Practices Among Medical Journals » led by Constant Vinatier. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com
Open Science Policies and Practices Among Medical Journals
This cross-sectional study evaluates which open science practices have been adopted by leading general medical journals and whether automated tools can assess article-level adherence.
033
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 03/09/2026
We're serving a full pot of ReproducibiliTea this September: 4 Sept (12:00 CET) | Bielefeld: Discussing van Rooij & Baggio’s "Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science” burst.pages.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/burst/
175
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
As research papers proliferate, can AI reviewers help humans check quality while keeping pace with the flood? Tests are revealing their strengths and weaknesses. #PeerReviewWeek @science.org www.science.org/content/article/can-ai-help-solve-peer-review-crisis-here-are-its-promises-and-pitfalls
science.org
Can AI help solve the peer-review crisis? Here are its promises and pitfalls
Amid a shortage of human reviewers, tests indicate AI can assist—but is not a savior
41511
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
For the Replicability Project: Health Behavior we need some editors and reviewers of analysis plans for secondary data replications, especially for complex designs including multilevel, weighting, clustering, missing data. Earns coauthorship on the summary paper. Interested? replications@cos.io
01514
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) @improvingpsych.org · 03/09/2026
Preregistrations are increasingly common, but getting them right isn’t always straightforward. Join us for the Preregistration F*ck Up Night at #DGPs2026 on Sep 6, at 7PM in Luxembourg! An initial round of drinks is kindly sponsored by @improvingpsych.org. 🔗 Register here: buff.ly/pmvpkjf
0166