Sign in

Jeffrey Brainard

@jeffreybrainard.bsky.social
497 followers 107 following 41 posts

Reporter, Science magazine. I write about scientific publishing, peer review, open science. jbrainard[[at]]aaas[[dot]]org. ... Signal: JBrainard.19 ... NewsScience[[at]]proton.me

PostsRepliesMedia
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Survey participants are often promised anonymity, but researchers studying crime posted a public data set that identified people who confessed to crimes. Without more care, #openscience can conflict with privacy #researchintegrity #academicpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Social science studies may promise anonymity, but participant identities often lurk in public data
One-fifth of data sets intended to support replication breached privacy standards, study finds
2215
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Conference poster sessions – do you attend? Find them useful? Overwhelming, too much information? What if you could find them all in one place and peruse them later? #scicomm #academicchatter @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Conference posters could garner a wider audience, thanks to a new online platform
The staple format also warrants a deeper rethink, some researchers say
1295
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
As research papers proliferate, can AI reviewers help humans check quality while keeping pace with the flood? Tests are revealing their strengths and weaknesses. #PeerReviewWeek @science.org www.science.org/content/article/can-ai-help-solve-peer-review-crisis-here-are-its-promises-and-pitfalls
science.org
Can AI help solve the peer-review crisis? Here are its promises and pitfalls
Amid a shortage of human reviewers, tests indicate AI can assist—but is not a savior
41511
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Hundreds of ads by #papermills, offering authorship on scientific articles for a fee, wound up published in conference proceedings. Are these venues a back-door route that’s too easy? #scicomm #retractions #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Hundreds of paper-mill papers peddled in ads were later published
More than one-fifth of some IEEE conferences’ papers appear linked to authorship for sale
11914
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
A leading researcher moved from the authors list to the acknowledgements section of a commentary amid growing U.S. restrictions on coauthorships with non-U.S. scholars. #scicomm @flynnmurphy.bsky.social @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Did U.S. scrutiny of foreign research drive prominent geneticist to decline authorship?
George Church moved to paper’s acknowledgements section, triggering exodus
0115
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
As submissions to scientific journals continue to climb, it’s becoming more time-consuming to find ones that may offer truly novel ideas. This U.K. competition is paying the winner £300,000 for suggesting how AI could help. #peerreview #scicomm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
How novel is that research paper? Competition to quantify concept crowns winner
The automated tool could be used to help journals vet submissions
0287
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
U.S. science agencies are forecast to pay more for #openaccess publication of journal articles. Are they ready? And is the author-pays business model sustainable? A GAO report draws criticism. #scholcomm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
U.S. agencies aren’t ready for the rising cost of making research papers free, report warns
Science agencies could soon face nearly $1 billion publishing bill, Congressional analysts find
1199
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
U.S. researchers who coauthor research papers with scientists affiliated with foreign institutions are drawing fresh scrutiny from NIH, NASA. #scientificpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
U.S. researchers face new restrictions on publishing with foreign collaborators
NIH, NASA grantees are confused and concerned amid agencies’ piecemeal communication
23623
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
#papermill ads: Not very shy. (The preprint on this new study was posted this week.) #sciencepublishing #researchintegrity www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Thousands of shady ads sell paper authorship for cash, large-scale investigation finds
Results are “only the tip of the iceberg” of shadowy paper-mill marketplace
030
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
The credibility of scientific journal articles might be bolstered if they carried a score capturing their rigor, such as whether the findings could be replicated. But constructing a telltale indicator of replicability remains a challenge. #openscience @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Across the social sciences, half of research doesn’t replicate
Ambitious effort tested whether more than 100 papers held up on multiple types of “repeatability” tests
1379
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
#AIagents promise to speed up ordinary online tasks, but they can also share private files publicly, delete others, and libel people. A new study examines these #AIsafety vulnerabilities. #OpenClaw #AIgovernance @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
AI algorithms can become ‘agents of chaos’
Given autonomous control of other software, programs shared private medical details and deleted files without permission
22814
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
#arXiv, the granddaddy of #preprints servers, has announced it’s splitting from Cornell U., its long-time host institution. Leaders there explain why. #OpenAccess #ScholComm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
ArXiv, the pioneering preprint server, declares independence from Cornell
As an independent nonprofit, it hopes to raise funds to cope with exploding submissions and “AI slop”
06531
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 07/03/2026
#preprints are seen as accelerating science – but do they accelerate #researchcareers? @science.org @sciencecareers.bsky.social #scientificpublishing #scicomm www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Career effects of preprints get mixed reviews from biomedical researchers
Junior researchers are more likely to embrace preprints; grant reviewers and hiring committees express doubts
0134
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
Are #openaccess fees that some journals charge authors too high? The Chinese Academy of Sciences, the world’s largest research institution, reportedly thinks so and plans to stop funding some, a move that could shake up #scientificpublishing. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Major Chinese funder to stop paying fees for 30 pricey open-access journals
Move comes amid effort to grow the country’s own journals
25033
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
Can researchers effectively use artificial intelligence to develop better understanding and insights into the rising number of scientific research papers if the content searched is siloed by publisher? #scicomm #scientificpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Journal giant Elsevier unveiled an AI tool that scans millions of paywalled papers. Is it worth it?
First-of-its-kind product raises questions about costs, access, and equity
0134
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
Many want to use AI to accelerate science, and utilizing it to explore the growing tsunami of research articles is getting lots of attention. Measuring the quality of AI answers to questions about science is a challenge. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Open-source AI program can answer science questions better than humans
Developed by and for academics, OpenScholar aims to improve searches of the ballooning scientific literature
1134
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 17/01/2026
#SpecialIssues have fueled the growth of some of the largest #OpenAccess publishers. Does a journal that allows a #GuestEditor to both plan a special issue and write many articles in it have a conflict of interest? #scicomm #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Some guest editors pack special issues with their own articles
Thousands have penned more than one-third of a journal issue, raising conflict-of-interest concerns
22618
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 30/12/2025
#OpenScience costs money - think author fees/ APCs - but is assumed to provide benefits for academe, the public, and the economy. The PathOS study explored new ways to measure that. But proving a direct effect is tricky. #scientificpublishing #scicomm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Is ‘open science’ delivering benefits? Major study finds proof is sparse
It’s hard to measure social and economic impacts of making papers and data free, researchers say
1165
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 19/12/2025
@science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
U.S. senator asks Science to provide its coronavirus manuscripts, emails
Rand Paul has blasted government science officials and scientists over COVID-19’s origin
196
Reposted by Jeffrey Brainard
Michael Greshko @michaelgreshko.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
🧪 ✏️ Apply for the 2026 Diverse Voices in Science Journalism Internship with @science.org! 🧪 ✏️ This could be for you if you're a student from a community historically underrepresented in #journalism who's interested in in covering science for general audiences: recruiting.ultipro.com/AME1123ASEM/...
recruiting.ultipro.com
01913
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
A sequel to #Plan_S -- the carrot, not the stick. Will that approach improve what ails #scientificpublishing? #ScholarlyComm #openaccess @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
After Coalition S disrupted scientific publishing, new plan retreats from strict requirements
The group’s latest strategy emphasizes consultation, lacks spending pledges
032
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
A rapidly growing share of letters to journals may be drafted by machines, undetected by editors. Study quantifies recently ‘prolific debutante authors’ who had published no letters before 2022, when ChatGPT debuted. #academicjournals #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Letters to scientific journals surge as ‘prolific debutante’ authors likely use AI
New study reinforces worries about “mass production of junk” by unscrupulous scholars aiming to pad their CVs
33012
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 23/10/2025
A human reviewer's take on an AI-written paper: 'Technically correct but neither interesting nor important.' Yesterday's first-of-its-kind #Agents4Science conference, where all papers were written and reviewed by #AI, considered their promise, limitations @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
At futuristic meeting, AIs took the lead in producing and reviewing all the studies
Organizers aim to tune AI to help accelerate science
2162
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 23/09/2025
The journal Science’s editorial reviews came under the microscope in a rare study using internal data it supplied. #peerreview #scientificjournals #scientificpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Whose papers have an edge at Science? In unusual study, journal looks in the mirror
Confidential data show being in the U.S., at a prestigious institution, and in a large team all may help
020
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
Trust but verify? #mlsky #scientificpublishing #sciencejournals @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Far more authors use AI to write science papers than admit it, publisher reports
Finding highlights promise, questions about detectors of AI-generated text
12512
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
Can AI help identify high-volume, low-quality, “questionable” scientific journals (which some, controversially, call #predatoryjournals )? Authors of this new study emphasize aiding not replacing human evaluators of these journals. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
AI tool labels more than 1000 journals for ‘questionable,’ possibly shady practices
New algorithm could help scientists avoid publishing in shady titles
0156
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 25/08/2025
The idea that AI-as-scientist will replace human researchers, or augment their creativity and productivity, is drawing attention. But how soon? @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
AI-generated scientific hypotheses lag human ones when put to the test
Machines still face hurdles in identifying fresh research paths, study suggests
1206
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
Can authors afford APCs for #openaccess publishing if NIH caps its payments for them? Institutional read-and-publish deals offer an APC-free alternative, but NIH also wants to lower the indirect cost rate to 15%, which could squeeze money for such deals. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
NIH details options for limiting its payments for open-access publishing fees
Other publishing proposals would scrap reimbursements or pay peer reviewers, unprecedented steps for a major government funder
2157
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 16/07/2025
Are scientists citing papers without reading them? #scientificpublishing #AcademicChatter #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
‘Lazy’ authors? One in six scientific papers mischaracterize work they cite
New study of long-standing problem takes novel approach, asking cited authors to evaluate accuracy
116320
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 03/07/2025
#researchfraud #papermills #academicpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Journal plagued with problematic papers, likely from paper mills, pauses submissions
The halt will let Taylor & Francis focus on checking Bioengineered’s papers for fraudulent works and paid authorships
044
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 02/07/2025
If getting a research grant required scoring applications from your competitors, would you apply? New evidence on this novel method, “distributed #peerreview,” at #Metascience2025. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Should grant applicants judge competitors’ proposals? Unorthodox approach gets two real-world tests
Distributed peer review enlists more researchers in the process, but some may lack expertise
3189
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 23/06/2025
Under a new NIH rule, the number of journal articles with #CreativeCommons licenses may soon grow. Many authors say they don't understand how CC licenses do - and don't - protect #intellectualproperty. A copyright lawyer explains. #openscience @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
What scientists need to know about sharing—and protecting—their published work
With research papers becoming increasingly free to read and use, understanding open-access licenses is key
040
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 09/06/2025
As AI presents new costs for scientific-society publishers, their revenues are strained. #openscience #publishingmodels #scholcomm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Open-access revolution is squeezing scientific societies’ budgets, survey shows
Decline in journal revenues puts scholarships, advocacy, and other activities at risk
020
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Is science becoming less innovative? A 2023 paper suggested many fields are. But a new study finds evidence that a growing subset of papers catalyze enduring new paths in research. #ScientificInnovation #bibliometrics @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Research may be increasingly incremental—but studies making lasting paradigm shifts are on the rise
New metric identifying “persistently disruptive” papers offers a “bright spot” amid signs of declining innovation
101
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 17/03/2025
DOGE-driven journal cancellations at USDA's National Agricultural Library: '[like] burning down the Library of Alexandria.' #scientificpublishing #libraryscience #academiclibraries @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
DOGE order leads to journal cancellations by U.S. agricultural library
“We can’t do science without these,” one researcher says of the hundreds of journals no longer accessible
1115
Reposted by Jeffrey Brainard
David Malakoff @davidmalakoff.bsky.social · 14/03/2025
EXCLUSIVE: Fear spreads that NIH will terminate grants involving South Africa | Science | AAAS www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Fear spreads that NIH will terminate grants involving South Africa
Trump has promised to cut off funding, claiming nation discriminates against white citizens
053
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
#bioRxiv and #medRxiv strike out on their own, as #medRxiv's preprint volume approaches its COVID-era peak. #peerreview #openscience #scientificpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
In bid to expand, bioRxiv and medRxiv preprint servers move to newly formed nonprofit
Backers seek to increase contributions from authors at institutions beyond the global elite
02911
Reposted by Jeffrey Brainard
John Travis @john-travis.bsky.social · 27/02/2025
Any conservative/Trump-voting federal scientists who have been fired and are willing to discuss their views on that whatever they may be?--or can others suggest people in that situation we should reach out to? Contact the News from Science team www.science.org/content/page...
science.org
Got a tip?
Got a tip for Science’s news department? Our reporters would like to hear from you. Here are ways to contact us.
279
Reposted by Jeffrey Brainard
John Travis @john-travis.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
Depending on your perspective it's a good/bad week for @science.org's news team to launch our Trump Tracker. Were recent NIH resignations voluntary? Will RFK Jr start firing scientists today? Why did a judge unfreeze U.S. foreign aid needed for clinical trials? www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Welcome to Trump Tracker
Follow President Donald Trump’s impact on U.S. research and science globally
37633
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
Many #researchintegrity sleuths are volunteers with little financial support for their often-daunting work to uncover #scientificfraud. One of the most prominent, Elisabeth Bik, has now provided money to change that. @elisabethbik.bsky.social @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Renowned scientific integrity investigator endows fund to support fellow sleuths
Microbiologist Elisabeth Bik donates $200,000 to support training, travel
411547
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
I’m glad to join the community here discussing science and #ScientificPublishing, which I write about for Science magazine. I welcome suggestions. #peerreview #ResearchPublication #ResearchPublishing #PublicationEthics #Authorship #ScientificCommunication #SciComm #scholcomm #AcademicSky
2134