Sign in

Gilad Feldman

@giladfeldman.bsky.social
3.5K followers 3.3K following 635 posts

Social psychology, judgment & decision-making/behavioral economics, agency, & action. Open/meta science. (Peer Community in) Registered Reports, mass replications, & meta-analyses. mgto.org/resume-cv

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
nuvanews.bsky.social @nuvanews.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
NSF and UKRI plan to collaborate on metascience to improve research funding, review, and evaluation through shared data and best practices. Source: NSF
nsf.gov
NSF–UKRI metascience statement
NSF and UKRI plan to collaborate on metascience to improve research funding, review, and evaluation through shared data and best practices.
011
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Neil Sehgal @nsehgal.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
Takeaway: safeguards should look beyond free text and consider repeated use across studies. A small group accounts for most observed assistance, so worker-level signals may help. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.09279 w/ @manueltonneau.bsky.social, Dunigan Folk, Lyle Ungar, & Sharath Chandra Guntuku
arxiv.org
AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved
Online research platforms underpin much of what science claims about people, on the assumption that a human produced each response. Generative AI threatens that assumption by letting participants dele...
111
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Neil Sehgal @nsehgal.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
This isn't only an open-ended-text problem. 53% of assisted submissions involved bounded responses (e.g., choices, ratings, exact answers). This is important because Prolific's optional LLM assistance detector only screens free text questions.
101
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Neil Sehgal @nsehgal.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
And that 1% was VERY concentrated. Just 5% of workers accounted for 2/3 of assisted submissions; the top 10% accounted for almost 80%! Excluding the top 5% dropped the assistance rate from 1% to 0.40% of submissions.
111
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Neil Sehgal @nsehgal.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
🚨 New paper 🚨 Are your participants using AI to take your study? We conducted the first study directly observing AI assistance in online research, spanning 700K+ Prolific submissions. We found very rare, concentrated AI use, but gaps in safeguards. arxiv.org/abs/2610.09279
13720
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Peer Community In @peercommunityin.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
1247 preprints have now received a recommendation from one of the 21 thematic PCI! Behind every recommendation is a community of researchers contributing their expertise. Could your preprint be next? 👉 Submit your research to PCI: peercommunityin.org/submit-a-pre...
peercommunityin.org
Submit a preprint to PCI - Peer Community In
Once an article has been recommended by a PCI, the authors can opt to leave it on a preprint server, to publish it in PCI Journal, to submit it to a PCI-friendly journal or to any other journal
0148
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Russ Poldrack @russpoldrack.org · 07/10/2026
Special Issue Call for Submissions: "Appraising the Foundations of Psychological Science" www.psychologicalscience.org/publications... Edited by @heatherurry.io @tombeckers.bsky.social
psychologicalscience.org
Special Issue Call for Submissions: “Appraising the Foundations of Psychological Science”
Editors: Tom Beckers and Heather UrryOne way a journal can earn its reputation for quality is to take active steps to vet the articles that appear within its pages after publication. To that end, Psyc...
0165
Gilad Feldman @giladfeldman.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
👏👏
010
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Prof. Madeleine Pownall @maddipow.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
As of today I am a Professor of Open Scholarship in Psychology! 🥂🩷
15834
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
simine vazire @simine.com · 07/10/2026
Another special issue at Psych Science! We invite “submissions that advance the field through critical appraisal of articles previously published by Psychological Science” Please share! www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
psychologicalscience.org
Special Issue Call for Submissions: “Appraising the Foundations of Psychological Science”
Editors: Tom Beckers and Heather UrryOne way a journal can earn its reputation for quality is to take active steps to vet the articles that appear within its pages after publication. To that end, Psyc...
610361
Gilad Feldman @giladfeldman.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
Wow, well done! 👏👏 That's exactly what I've always been hoping to do, but never got around to it. Thanks for covering our work, even the ones only as theses and preprints. 🙏🏻 Going to be important resource in my courses moving forward. Wish this was collaborative so that we can keep updating it.
110
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Stephanie Simoes @critikid.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
Since "Thinking, Fast and Slow" was published in 2011, science has faced the replication crisis. Many famous findings have failed to reproduce, including many from the book. It remains a valuable book on judgment, but it should be read with caution. I wrote this to help: critikid.com/a-modern-gui...
critikid.com
A Modern Guide to Thinking, Fast and Slow - Critikid
A chapter-by-chapter analysis of Kahneman's text with a focus on the replication crisis, clarifying which findings remain solid and which have not held up to scrutiny.
2174
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Andrey Chetverikov @achetverikov.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Some months ago, I wrote a skeptical reply to a commentary on bots in online studies in PNAS, arguing that no evidence yet exists for such bots. Together with the authors of the original commentary, we now show that bots can pass (almost?) all online cognitive studies with human-like performance 1/n
25129
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
James Balamuta @coatless.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
webrarian is a new R package. It turns a folder of R scripts and data into a static website where R runs in the visitor's browser, with no compute server and nothing to install. blog.thecoatlessprofessor.com/posts/introd... #rstats #webr #webassembly
A card for the R package webrarian. Large text reads "A folder in. A website out." On the left, a small card lists a folder named lab-01 holding lab.R, setup.R and a data folder. A red arrow points from it to a browser window that shows a scatterplot of car weight against miles per gallon with brick-red points. The address coatless-wasm.github.io/webrarian is on the card.
516166
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
What do we expect of robustness reproductions in the age of AI? Help us find out at the Münster Reprohack workshop from December 2-4. We will conduct AI-led and human-led robustness reproductions, that are subsequently submitted to @r2journal.bsky.social Apply at indico.uni-muenster.de/e/reprohack
indico.uni-muenster.de
ReproHack
ReproHack: Join us for a mentored three-day reproduction hackathon! Background When building on past research, we rely on it being correct and robust - and yet, these characteristics are rarely assess...
01010
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Steve Fleming @smfleming.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
Excited to be launching our new PhD program in Minds and Machines at UCL with co-Directors Tali Sharot and @nadinedijkstra.bsky.social To apply, find out more here: www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-scienc... Our launch event is on Nov 10th, with a cracking lineup of speakers: luma.com/cikzcth0
lnkd.in
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
210252
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
If you want to listen to a podcast about a team taking a solid and thoughtful approach to replicating a classic study, thinking carefully about translation, replicating multiple versions of the same hypothesis, etc, listen to Rolf Zwaan's "Research as it Happens" shows.acast.com/research-as-...
shows.acast.com
Research as it Happens
Listen to episodes and learn more about Research as it Happens. What does science look like while it’s still unfolding?In Research as it Happens, we go inside a large-scale psychology project, where…
1146
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Flavio Azevedo @flavioazevedo.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
🚨📢 WE’RE HIRING! Junior Research Assistant for PPBS at Utrecht University 🗳️🔬 💅 R + Quarto + reproducible survey pipelines ✨ Post-Master’s experience desirable, not required 📍 20–24 h/week | 2.5–3.5 months (pay step dependent) 📅 Apply by Sun 11 Oct 👉 lnkd.in/e7FZGFaK 🌐 ppbs.science
lnkd.in
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
035
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
We are excited to announce that we are going to broadcast the second day of Meta-Research Symposium 2026 (this Friday on October 9th) for those who were interested but unable to join in person. JOIN: teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-joi... PROGRAM: docs.google.com/document/u/0...
docs.google.com
Meta Research Symposium 2026
Meta Research Symposium 2026 8-9 October, 2026, TU/e Eindhoven Conference website: https://paulmeehlschool.github.io/workshops/symposium2026/ Times are in central European time. To check the time…
01710
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Big Team Science Conference @btscon.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
#BTSCON2026 starts soon! We can’t wait to celebrate another year of big team science with all of you! 🥰 @psysciacc.bsky.social @manybabies.org @manyprimates.bsky.social @manydogsproject.bsky.social @manylanguagesc.bsky.social @cos.io @forrt.bsky.social @abrir.bsky.social @reproducibilitea.org
bigteamscienceconference.github.io
Big Team Science Conference
The goal of the Big Team Science Conference is to bring together a multidisciplinary group of researchers, funders, and stakeholders to discuss advancements, challenges, and future opportunities relat...
01913
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
"Estimators based on meta-analysis methods that correct for potential bias in the original study were close to unbiased when synthesizing the original study and replication...meta-analytic estimates were substantially closer to the effect size of the replication compared to the original study."
journals.plos.org
Evaluation of replication success: A statistical perspective and extended analysis of the SCORE data
Replications are more and more conducted in multiple research fields. A recent large-scale replication project, Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE) project, replicated 274 e...
0228
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
Third, a Psychology of Science Hub collaboration I co-authored: ⚡ Publishing, Incentives, and Conflict: An Action Research Inquiry 📅 Thu, Oct 8 | 10:30–11:25 UTC Sessions have several talks; stay for the whole slot! 🎟️ Register free: bigteamscienceconference.github.io
053
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Ensar Acem @ensaracem.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
⚡ ManyContexts: Measuring the Worlds That Big Team Science Samples 📅 Wed, Oct 7 | 13:00–13:55 UTC ⚡ Invariance Blindness: When Cross-Cultural Inference Outruns Measurement Validity 📅 Thu, Oct 8 | 10:30–11:25 UTC
141
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Björn Brembs @brembs.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 02/10/2026
Mark you calendars: #zurich Wednesday, October 21, 3.30pm, keynote presentation: "Replacing Academic Journals" Open Access Week | Lib4RI www.lib4ri.ch/open-access-week #openaccess #openscience
lib4ri.ch
Open Access Week | Lib4RI
045
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Christoph Strauch @cstrauch.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
How much of a risk are LLM-generated bots for online behavioral experiments? We present results of an entirely natural language prompt-generated agent, capable of absolving any of the 26 experiments we tested it on. Most tasks are passed with data that can pass as human osf.io/preprints/ps... (1/)
59344
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 02/10/2026
📋 Registration Open: BITSS Annual Meeting Share novel research and discuss efforts to improve the credibility of social science by advancing research transparency, reproducibility, rigor, and ethics. BITSS 2027 will be held Feb. 26 in Berkeley, CA. Free to attend. Register:
docs.google.com
2027 BITSS Annual Meeting Registration
The BITSS Annual Meeting brings together actors from academia, scholarly publishing, and policy to share novel research and discuss efforts to improve the credibility of social science by advancing research transparency, reproducibility, rigor, and ethics. The 15th BITSS Annual Meeting will be held on Friday, February 26, 2027 in Berkeley, CA at the Tamalpais Room, Brower Center. Please register for this event by filling out the brief form below. We'll follow up over email with specific instructions for attending the event in early February. This event is free to attend and we also welcome graduate students. NOTE: We cannot sponsor travel or hotel accommodations for the Annual Meeting. Those attending the event in-person must cover their own costs; we have limited travel support available for speakers.
045
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Nicholas A. Coles, PhD @nicholascoles.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
When we fake smiles, are we smiling our way to happiness or misery? 🙃 For decades, emotion embodiment theorists have emphasized happiness boosts -- all while emotion labor theorists emphasized misery costs. In this Registered Report, we finally put these ideas side-by-side doi.org/10.1016/j.je...
1168
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Matti Vuorre @matti.vuorre.com · 01/10/2026
Good talk. There's a lot of (over)thinking of this at the moment. Zenodo just works. (Until it doesn't when we and our bots ruin that as well.) Collaborate on GitHub and refer to zenodo.
2359
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Resource 6: Katie Corker on how to link objects stored elsewhere (e.g., OSF Registry, PsyArXiv) to Zenodo via persistent identifiers (e.g., DOI). (see October 2026 talk, which should automatically load): zenodo.org/records/2307...
zenodo.org
ASAPbio staff presentations
This is a repository for slide decks associated with ASAPbio staff member talks and presentations from 2025 onwards. Slide decks are provided under a CC-BY licence. Please direct any questions pertain...
032
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Resource 5: Amanda Montoya's video explainer on how to use Zenodo, including creating anonymous links: www.youtube.com/watch?v=jW84...
youtube.com
Getting Started with Zenodo (transitioning from OSF Projects)
YouTube video by AMANDA MONTOYA
131
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Gave a talk in my dept. on the OSF transition. I wrote up a rough script of the session, which could be of interest to others. I synthesize existing resources and provide my own perspectives. Comments and corrections welcome! zenodo.org/records/2306...
the header for a paper describing "Life after OSF" #metascience
215872
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Experimental Philosophy @xphilosopher.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
There has been a huge amount of experimental philosophy research on the concept of KNOWLEDGE This research finds that the ordinary concept doesn’t work at all the way philosophers said it does A thread with some examples: 🧵
34517
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Peer Community In @peercommunityin.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
A PCI recommendation can be a valuable part of a publication strategy: · The recommendation and peer-reviews are citable · You participate in open science initiatives · You can publish in the journal of your choice 👉 Explore your publishing options with PCI: peercommunityin.org/submit-a-pre...
peercommunityin.org
Submit a preprint to PCI - Peer Community In
Once an article has been recommended by a PCI, the authors can opt to leave it on a preprint server, to publish it in PCI Journal, to submit it to a PCI-friendly journal or to any other journal
076
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 28/09/2026
🗓️ Reminder: The first OSF Projects transition deadline is 7 weeks away. Starting November 16, 2026, you will no longer be able to create new OSF Projects or add new components to existing projects. (🧵1/3)
OSF projects changes chart
11217
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Metascience 2027 @metascienceconf.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Meet the Metascience 2027 Program Steering Committee! This international group is shaping the program for Metascience 2027 on June 14-16, 2027, in Montreal. 🧵👇 #Metascience2027
Graphic with a dark blue geometric background. At top left is the Metascience 2027 Conference logo, and at top right the title "Program Steering Committee." Below are eight headshots in two rows of four, each with a name and affiliation. Top row: Annabel Seyller, Co-Chair, Tanenbaum Open Science Institute; Vincent Larivière, Co-Chair, Université de Montréal; Dominique Roche, SSHRC-CRSH; Moumita Koley, DST-Centre for Policy Research. Bottom row: Gabriel Pelletier, Tanenbaum Open Science Institute; Emmanuel Boakye, African Reproducibility Network; Kelly Cobey, Ottawa Heart Institute; Tim Errington, Center for Open Science. The sponsor logos for The Neuro Tanenbaum Open Science Institute and the Center for Open Science are along the bottom of the graphic.
11310
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
We did an entire special issue on registered reported with secondary data. There are many others elsewhere as well: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15227219...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Registered Reports with Secondary Developmental Data: Infant and Child Development: Vol 33, No 2
Infant and Child Development: prenatal, childhood, adolescence, emerging adulthood is a premier developmental science journal for transparent and open research.
093
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Ruben C. Arslan @ruben.the100.ci · 11/09/2026
An interesting thing is happening to me at the moment. I have a standing bug bounty policy for my first authored scientific work. That means, I've committed to pay people who report bugs in my code, up to 750€ for severe errors. Since GPT-6 Astra came out, I'm now getting several bug reports daily.
39334
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
We just published a new paper (led by Love von Schreeb) demonstrating how large language models can be used to link published results to trial registrations with very high accuracy! Now out in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - check it out: www.jclinepi.com/article/S089...
jclinepi.com
TrialScout links published results to trial registrations using a large language model
Multiple stakeholders need to locate results of registered clinical trials but frequently struggle to find them. Summary results of clinical trials are often not published in trial registries, and pub...
1187
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Randy Ellis @randalljellis.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Here’s my conversation with Chris Chambers on Metascience Matters. Chris was the first journal editor to offer registered reports, starting in 2013 at Cortex. youtu.be/PgZjgZlxsYw?...
youtu.be
Registered reports | Chris Chambers
YouTube video by Metascience Matters
11912
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
UCD Library @ucdlibrary.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
University Librarian Dr. Sandra Collins will be speaking at the upcoming #AI in Science Summit 2026, held in O'Reilly Hall here at University College Dublin on 15-16 October. Register: www.ais26.eu #AIS26 is part of #EuropeanAIInnovationMonth @ucdresearch.bsky.social @ucdischool.bsky.social
Headshot of Dr. Sandra Collins, University Librarian at UCD. Open Science and Data for Research graphic. AI in Science Summit 15th and 16th of October.
093
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Supramundane Agency @supramundane.agency · 23/09/2026
Institute of Open Science Practices — IOSP 2026 An event for the people building, using, and advancing the infrastructure open science depends on. I’ll be demonstrating work relating to publishing datasets to the Atmosphere. supramundane.agency/2026/1012-iosp-…
supramundane.agency
Institute of Open Science Practices — IOSP 2026
An event for the people building, using, and advancing the infrastructure open science depends on. I’ll be demonstrating work relating to publishing datasets to the Atmosphere.
001
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Maksim Rudnev 🇺🇦 @maksimrudnev.com · 21/09/2026
In case you want to download all your files from OSF, this R script just worked for me gist.github.com/MaksimRudnev... NB! It downloads *only* your files stored on OSF - no preregs, no preprints, no metadata. For complete download of everything, you can follow help.osf.io/article/742-...
gist.github.com
Download every file from your OSF account
Download every file from your OSF account. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
031
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 22/09/2026
🎉 ReproducibiliTea 2026 Conference | 25 September 2026 “A decade on & decades ahead” Lunch Break & Parallel Journal Clubs | 14:10–16:10 CEST Grab a bite and a warm cup of tea, then join us for interactive discussions! ⇆ Both journal clubs run at the same time in separate rooms.
274
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Lionel Page @lionelpage.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
AI is set to change how research is peer reviewed. I discussed about this with Achim Czerny. youtu.be/BI1B-YO8U8A?...
youtu.be
AI vs. peer review — Lionel Page on what breaks and what improves
YouTube video by Achim I. Czerny | Aviation & Maritime Economics
013
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
And if you want to see how your OSF repos compare against this corpus in terms of usability try my OSF reusability checker app. This app also provides tips if it flags any potential issues dsquintana.shinyapps.io/osf-reusabil...
Screenshot of a web app called the OSF Reusability Checker. A panel on the left takes OSF project links or IDs, with a checkbox for "Also inspect code" and a Check button. On the right, results for one project, kd6p8: it contains data or code, is documented, and has retrievable code. A percentile chart shows its 21 downloads at the 10th percentile for projects of its age, 0.2 times what a repository that age typically gets. Below, three bars compare it with published psychology projects: documented (30% of 672 projects) — this repo yes; hard-coded path (34% of 333 with code) — no; loads a missing file (40% of 333 with code) — no. A results table lists 21 downloads, age-adjusted percentile 10, reuse score 4 out of 4, cleanup "clean", and "looks good".Screenshot of one row from the OSF Reusability Checker's results table, for project rxphw (one of mine!). It has 1,558 downloads, placing it at the 98th percentile for repositories of its age, but scores only 2 out of 4 on reuse, with the cleanup verdict "needs data/code added". The "what to fix" column reads: 6 scripts hard-code a file path — use here::here(); 6 missing files, including 3 data files — deposit them, or add a data-availability statement if access is restricted.
1126
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
William Ngiam | 严祥全 @williamngiam.github.io · 19/09/2026
Check out the reusability checker ShinyApp! It's very useful for making sure your data repositories are in good condition before the upcoming read-only freeze of OSF repositories.
041
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
New preprint! 🎉 I analysed 1660 papers from 4 psychology journals and found materials sharing went from 9% of papers in 2015 to 82% in 2025, and these materials *do* get downloaded — a median of 135 times each. BUT shared code is often hard to run. doi.org/10.31234/osf... Let's walk through it 🧵
Two-panel figure. Panel a is a flow diagram tracking 1,611 empirical psychology articles from publication year (545 in 2015, 552 in 2020, 514 in 2025) to repository-link type: 785 link an OSF project, 85 link another platform, and 741 link no repository. Of those with an OSF link, download counts were retrieved for 670 and not retrieved for 115. Panel b is a line chart of the share of empirical papers linking OSF across 2015, 2020 and 2025. The overall rate, shown as a dashed black line, rises from 9% to 57% to 82%. All four journals rise steeply and end close together: Psychological Science 92%, JESP 89%, JML 83%, Cognition 76%, with Psychological Science highest throughout.Three-panel figure. Panel a: ridgeline plot of downloads per file by material type on a log scale, with the percentage never downloaded labelled for each — archive 16% of 545 files, documents 20% of 2,970, code 12% of 3,471, other 17% of 1,646, data 21% of 10,051, media 35% of 2,120, images 35% of 4,102. Most files cluster between 1 and 10 downloads, with long right tails past 100. Panel b: ridgeline plot of downloads per paper by journal, log scale, with dashed median lines; Psychological Science is highest, then JESP, JML and Cognition. Panel c: stacked bars showing, for documents, data and code separately, the share of papers by download band (0, 1–10, 11–100, more than 100) in 2015, 2020 and 2025. The share exceeding 100 downloads falls sharply over time in all three types, from roughly two-thirds in 2015 to a quarter or less in 2025, as the 1–10 band grows.Four-panel figure. Panel a: statistical languages detected among 333 papers with retrievable code — R 88%, SPSS 12%, Stata 4%, SAS 1%. Panel b: code red flags among those 333 papers — 34% hard-code an absolute path, 40% reference a missing file — above documentation among 672 OSF-linked papers — 21% have a README, 30% are documented by README, description or wiki. Panel c: among 562 Elsevier papers with no repository link, 44% (245) host at least one journal supplementary file but only 14% (77) host data, code or an archive. Panel d: composition of those 448 hosted files — documents 52%, data 21%, media 9%, other 7%, archive 6%, code 3%, images 1%. The code panels are green, the journal-supplement panels blue.Coefficient plot (download predictors)

Dot-and-whisker plot of three standardised predictors of OSF download volume, each with a 95% confidence interval. Repository size (number of files) has the largest effect at about 0.76, citations about 0.38, and altmetric attention about 0.12. All three intervals sit entirely above zero, so each predicts more downloads, with repository size roughly twice the effect of citations and six times that of attention. X-axis: standardised effect, −0.2 to 1.0.
4268113
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Come to Münster and work with us on tools to make replications more visible! In the thread are some examples from our past two events.
234
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 17/09/2026
Join an international team in Münster from Nov 11-13 for the Making Replications Count Hackathon—a fully funded, 3-day event dedicated to building tools that make replication studies easier to find and use. Apply by Oct 14 (Oct 5 if you require a visa). More info: indico.uni-muenster.de/e/marco3
indico.uni-muenster.de
Making Replication Count: Fall Hackathon
Join us for a three-day-hackathon to create tools to increase the visibility of replications! Background In the social, behavioral, and cognitive sciences, replications are rarely conducted, difficult...
061
Reposted by Gilad Feldman
Bastian Jaeger @bxjaeger.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Now out at EJSP: We explored cultural & individual differences in the hierarchy of moral concern across student samples from 41 cultural groups (n >6500). doi.org/10.1002/ejsp...
175