Sign in

Brian D. Earp, PhD

@briandavidearp.bsky.social
5.5K followers 538 following 633 posts

A/Prof Biomedical Ethics, Philosophy & Psychology (ctsy), National University of Singapore. Director, Oxford-NUS Centre for Neuroethics & Society. Co-Editor, Journal of Medical Ethics (BMJ)

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Dr Juliette @ferrydanini.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Is there any philosophy (or medicine) paper on what we mean by fatigue and tiredness?
123915
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
New 🚨 When Healthcare Decisions Exceed Normal Cognition: AI-Assisted Deliberation and the Future of Informed Consent - in press at npj Digital Medicine www.researchgate.net/publication/...
researchgate.net
(PDF) When Healthcare Decisions Exceed Normal Cognition: AI-Assisted Deliberation and the Future of Informed Consent
PDF | Informed consent is widely regarded as the cornerstone of modern medical ethics. However, in practice, it often fails to achieve its aims, not... | Find, read and cite all the research you need…
010
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
The Seductions of Clarity | Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements | Cambridge Core www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
The Seductions of Clarity | Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements | Cambridge Core
The Seductions of Clarity - Volume 89
000
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Justin Caouette, Ph.D. @justincaouette.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
On Vibe Scholarship via @briandavidearp.bsky.social #philsky #philosophy #AI #ethics #publishing
briandavidearp.substack.com
"Vibe critiques" are coming: the unbearable asymmetry of bullshit revisited
From vibe coding to vibe "critiquing" -- and what this means for academics who work on controversial topics
164
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
From vibe coding to vibe critiquing? On AI, bullshit, and what I actually argue about genital cutting -- a response to Steve Grumette www.researchgate.net/publication/...
researchgate.net
(PDF) From vibe coding to vibe critiquing? On AI, bullshit, and what I actually argue about genital cutting -- a response to Steve Grumette
PDF | In a recent issue of Free Inquiry, Steve Grumette characterizes my scholarly work on the ethics of child genital cutting as advancing a "dangerous... | Find, read and cite all the research you…
221
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
David Yaden @existwell.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Meeting with scientists, clinicians, and bioethicists in DC to discuss practical ethical guidelines for clinical applications of psychedelics. Meeting led by @eddietalksdrugs.bsky.social & @katherinecheung.bsky.social with @briandavidearp.bsky.social and I glad to see HOPE doing some applied work
131
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Kevin Tobia @kevintobia.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Paper by @luciagarzon.bsky.social @jorgesuarezm.bsky.social & @ivarr.bsky.social. This is such a great paper, with psych. and NLP methods. And a fascinating philosophical discussion of how these features illuminate the normative debate about consent in certain domains (e.g. sexual relationships)
011
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Kevin Tobia @kevintobia.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Cool new studies on psychology of consent. We associate consent with a patient (not agentic) role that communicates instrumental (not intrinsic) desire. E.g. A patient consents for the (agent) doctor to perform surgery to (instrumentally) promote health. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
142
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Evidence Isn’t Always Enough | Los Angeles Review of Books lareviewofbooks.org/article/beyo...
lareviewofbooks.org
Evidence Isn’t Always Enough | Los Angeles Review of Books
A new book explores the ‘evidence revolution,’ whose aim is to ground consequential decisions in evidence rather than opinion.
092
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 25/09/2026
Wake up babe, new Gettier problem just dropped en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier...
Gettier attempts to illustrate by means of two counterexamples that there are cases where individuals can have a justified true belief regarding a claim but still fail to know it because the reasons for the belief, while justified, turn out to be false.
2476
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
last of the balcony tomatoes
3383
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Individualizing Informed Consent: For Whom, and How Far? www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Browse all journals
Browse all journals
011
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Anita Leirfall @anitaleirfall.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Watermarks are not the solution About that Anthropic announcement... | By Brian D. Earp briandavidearp.substack.com/p/watermarks... #AI #writing #PhilosophySky #philsky
briandavidearp.substack.com
Watermarks are not the solution
About that Anthropic announcement...
012
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
New preprint 🚨 "The prose penalty in AI-assisted authorship" -- led by Faisal Feroz -- we find that *drafting prose* is central to laypeople's judgments of authorship credit, more than any other tested part of the writing process www.researchgate.net/publication/...
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
@kaltweis.bsky.social I'm glad you don't find it trivial, at least! Here are some thoughts on the AI slop hashtag you included in your message, in case of interest ☺️ briandavidearp.substack.com/p/human-slop...
briandavidearp.substack.com
Human slop, AI criticism, and schmauthorship
A guest post (sort of) by an LLM
101
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
Yes it’s a classic and well worth the read www.ditext.com/hare/1979b.p...
ditext.com
2426
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Come join my team at NUS! Working on empirical and experimental studies around public attitudes and psychology around AI, longevity, precision medicine, genomics. Research Fellow (Quantitative Research) careers.nus.edu.sg/job/Research...
careers.nus.edu.sg
Research Fellow (Quantitative Research)
Research Fellow (Quantitative Research)
077
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
New paper 🚨 Paediatric Preference Prediction: the Future of Decision-Making for Children? - Neuroethics - with D Wilkinson and J Savulescu link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
Paediatric Preference Prediction: the Future of Decision-Making for Children? - Neuroethics
Adolescents sometimes express firm views about high-stakes medical decisions that conflict with those of their caregivers or clinicians, raising difficult questions about how much weight their wishes…
010
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
AI watermarks do not measure intellectual contribution: Implications for academic publishing www.researchgate.net/publication/...
researchgate.net
(PDF) AI watermarks do not measure intellectual contribution: Implications for academic publishing
PDF | Following a recent announcement from Anthropic that its publicly available large language models will introduce watermarks going forward,... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on…
000
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Sven Nyholm @svennyholm.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
Great new paper by Elzė Sigutė Mikalonytė, Julian Savulescu, and Brian D. Earp: "Love and Cause: When is Biomedical Enhanced Love Desirable?" www.researchgate.net/publication/... The paper engages with some of the most recent interventions on this topic by Emma Gordon and me. #bioethics #philosophy
researchgate.net
(PDF) Love and Cause: When is Biomedically Enhanced Love Desirable?
PDF | There is a philosophical debate about whether the use of biomedical enhancements to promote or sustain love in romantic relationships is... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on Res...
054
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Journal of Applied Philosophy @the-joap.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
#NewArticle Love and Cause: When Is Biomedically Enhanced Love Desirable? Elzė Sigutė Mikalonytė, Julian Savulescu, Brian D. Earp Read it here 👇 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.... #OpenAccess #Philsky #Philosophy
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Love and Cause: When Is Biomedically Enhanced Love Desirable?
There is a philosophical debate about whether the use of biomedical enhancements to promote or sustain love in romantic relationships is compatible with the desirability of such love. We argue that e....
031
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Experimental Philosophy @handle.invalid · 02/09/2026
I strongly agree with this claim (see screenshot) I wonder if all fields go through this same trajectory? At first, there’s a lot of discussion of more “meta-“ questions about the nature of the field itself. Then, gradually, everyone stops talking about that stuff and just starts doing research
152
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
Interesting perspective ... Against AI-use declarations jme.bmj.com/content/earl...
jme.bmj.com
https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2026/08/13/jme-2026-112386
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
The epistemic debt of generative AI - Nature Machine Intelligence www.nature.com/articles/s42...
nature.com
The epistemic debt of generative AI - Nature Machine Intelligence
When authors use generative AI in cognitive tasks, without spending time and effort to understand the output, a gap opens between what they present and what they can defend. This gap widens as…
010
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Paul Harland @pabloredux.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
"After the death of the author: generative AI and the ethics of academic evaluation" jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/3/... with contributions by @davidgunkel.bsky.social & Hayate Shimizu, notably, from a changing distribution of human conscious participants supported by impermanent cultural scaffolding.
jmepb.bmj.com
After the death of the author: generative AI and the ethics of academic evaluation
Brian Earp and colleagues ask what authorship should mean in the age of generative artificial intelligence (AI) assisted writing. 1 Our answer is that the author should not be kept on life support. Au...
154
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
New preprint 🚨 "Who—or what—should predict an incapacitated patient's wishes? Public attitudes towards AI in substituted medical decision-making" - www.researchgate.net/publication/...
041
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Ethical analysis of tooth extraction on patient request
jmepb.bmj.com
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
New Preprint 🚨 In Favour of Personalised AI Moral Advisors: Six Design Conditions www.researchgate.net/publication/...
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Interesting persepctive from long-time Bioethics editor Udo Schuklenk: "Why journal editors should stop policing authorship" - Journal of Medical Ethics blog blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethi... (a reflection on his commentary for our special collection on AI and authorship jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/3/... )
blogs.bmj.com
Why journal editors should stop policing authorship - Journal of Medical Ethics blog
By Udo Schuklenk Brian Earp and colleagues invited commentaries on authorship and generative AI. They offer us some good reasons for why generative AI will be forcing us to disaggregate authorship,…
120
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 25/07/2026
Content, not provenance, is what matters: why journal editors should not police authorship
jmepb.bmj.com
010
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
Friends! Josh Knobe & Ivar Hannikainen, dear colleagues & mentors to many of us, are running a v. short study seeking *philosophers* as participants, to see about your intuitions about various famous cases. If you are a philosopher, please take their 5 min survey! moralsciencelab.com/intuitions/
022
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
Latest in JME Practical Bioethics 🚨 "Ethics of ‘digital duplicates’ or AI simulations of real people: towards an international consensus" - Now that anyone can easily make an AI "twin" of themselves or others, how should this be ethically evaluated? Open access: jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/3/...
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
New preprint 🚨Peer Reviewers Should be Allowed to Upload Manuscripts to AI Publishers bar peer reviewers—but not authors or editors—from feeding manuscripts to AI. The main arguments in favour of the ban don't survive scrutiny. LINK: www.researchgate.net/publication/...
032
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
New preprint 🚨 When Healthcare Decisions Exceed Normal Cognition: AI-Assisted Deliberation and the Future of Informed Consent www.researchgate.net/publication/...
030
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 19/07/2026
Child genital cutting and surgery across cultures, sex, and gender. Part 2: assessing consent and medical necessity in “endosex” modifications - International Journal of Impotence Research www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Child genital cutting and surgery across cultures, sex, and gender. Part 2: assessing consent and medical necessity in “endosex” modifications - International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research - Child genital cutting and surgery across cultures, sex, and gender. Part 2: assessing consent and medical necessity in “endosex” modifications
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 19/07/2026
The unspoken tensions that AI brings to academic collaboration - Nature Human Behaviour www.nature.com/articles/s41... ... yes makes some good points. Ironically, though, pretty clearly written with AI.
nature.com
The unspoken tensions that AI brings to academic collaboration - Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour - The unspoken tensions that AI brings to academic collaboration
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
Circumcision as a Critical Test Case for the Value of Religious Bioethics: A Close Examination of the Writings of Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff www.researchgate.net/publication/...
researchgate.net
(PDF) Circumcision as a Critical Test Case for the Value of Religious Bioethics: A Close Examination of the Writings of Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff
PDF | This essay examines the role of religion in bioethics through the lens of male circumcision, focusing on the work of Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff, a... | Find, read and cite all the research you need…
032
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Marie Snyder @mariesnyder.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
Attie-Picker argues that a student's email about a weak assignment wasn't an excuse, but a plea for forgiveness. #EduSky
011
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
Marylin Delgado @philosophypills.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
Appealing to who we are (or who we are not) as a way of asking for forgiveness #philsky
021
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
Getting Out of Blame: Excuses, Forgiveness, and the Deep Self onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Getting Out of Blame: Excuses, Forgiveness, and the Deep Self
We often feel that what we have done is somehow not in keeping with who we are. This tension, or incongruity, between the person we take ourselves to be and what that person has done seems to matter…
253
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 11/07/2026
New 🚨 in JME Practical Bioethics: "Beyond fixed categories: dynamic vulnerability and context-sensitive inclusion in the revised Declaration of Helsinki" by Florencia Luna — a response to last year's analysis of the 2024 DoH revision OPEN ACCESS link ➡️ jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/3/...
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
Oops! Here is the correct link for this one jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/2/...
jmepb.bmj.com
The Marburg outbreak in Rwanda: a One Health success story?
The recent Marburg Virus Disease outbreak in Rwanda has been praised as a public health and One Health (OH) success story. In this essay, I question this praise. I point to several knowledge gaps or i...
000
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
New 🚨 Issue of JME Practical Bioethics (Vol 2 Issue 3), led by a new instalment of our recurring series: 🌍 Global Bioethics Bulletin 📰 dispatches on access to abortion, featuring our dedicated regional editors and helmed this time by Shizuko Takahashi OPEN ACCESS ➡️ jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/2/...
001
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
New 🚨 in JME Practical Bioethics: "The Marburg outbreak in Rwanda: a One Health success story?" by Zohar Lederman — the 2024 outbreak has been widely praised as a model response. This paper asks whether that praise is warranted. OPEN ACCESS link ➡️ jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/2/...
010
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
New 🚨 in JME Practical Bioethics: "Anticipatory antibiotics as preventive medicine: the ethics of proactive clinical trials" by Mardikar Should we wait until an antibiotic stops working before we test what comes next? Mardikar argues argues no. OPEN ACCESS jmepb.bmj.com/content/2/2/...
111
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research
jme.bmj.com
000
Reposted by Brian D. Earp, PhD
John Holbein @johnholbein1.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
I just handled a manuscript where we had to invite 17 referees to get 2 reviews. I used to wonder why peer review takes so long. Multiple factors are at play. But editors face a Herculean task of getting reviewers to accept and then deliver in the current moment.
3373
Brian D. Earp, PhD @briandavidearp.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
New paper (under review). 🚨 "Against Mandatory Prompt Disclosure in AI-Assisted Scholarship" by myself, Udo Schuklenk, Julian Savulescu, and Sebastian Porsdam Mann buff.ly/8V1W29A
000