Sign in

Andrew Trexler

@atrexler.com
742 followers 375 following 181 posts

Assistant professor. | He/his. | Political communication, political behavior, news media, public opinion, survey methods. | atrexler.com | Opinions own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Isabella Rebasso @isabellareb.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
New paper with Yanna Krupnikov out in Political Communication! 🎉 We know moral-emotional content ("moral outrage") spreads fast on social media. But does that mean people actually want to see it? We tested whether people select this content when given the choice - turns out, not really.
tandfonline.com
Rethinking Assumptions About Moral Content Selection: Moral-Emotional Content May Be Less Appealing Than Assumed
Recent work has shown that moral-emotional content spreads rapidly on social media platforms such as X (Twitter). These patterns have led to concerns that social media facilitates the spread of mor...
17641
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Mark Copelovitch @mcopelov.bsky.social · 26/08/2026
I am on the environmental politics committee and also happy to chat at APSA!
01812
Andrew Trexler @atrexler.com · 26/08/2026
UW-Madison Poli Sci has THREE searches for TT assistant professors: Environmental politics: go.wisc.edu/1gk366 Chinese politics: go.wisc.edu/847082 American political thought: go.wisc.edu/lfwg6o I am not on any of the search committees, but happy to chat about the dept/UW/Madison/etc at APSA!
04534
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Claire E. Robertson, PhD @crobertson500.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Is social media truly making us more politically polarized, or does it simply over-represent our most extreme opinions? In our new preprint, @small-schulz.bsky.social and I present *punishing evidence* that social media systematically overrepresents users’ most extreme political opinions. 1/n
25331
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Drew Engelhardt @amengel.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
Working on a dissertation in American political behavior and need money for survey research? Apply for a grant worth up to $15,000 from the Rapoport Family Foundation. They’re planning on awarding up to 15 grants this cycle. Deadline Oct. 21. www.rapoportfamilyfoundation.com/phdgrant
rapoportfamilyfoundation.com
Rapoport Doctoral Dissertation Grants
Supporting projects for PhD students doing political science research, democracy and social justice.
17790
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Adam Bonica @adambonica.bsky.social · 16/08/2026
The fundraising texts you delete are working on someone. It’s infuriating and heartbreaking. An 85yo in Ohio gave more than double the value of his home. A 91yo in an Indianapolis senior facility gave 25K times. The DCCC/DSCC don’t just tolerate the spammers who exploit seniors. They take part.
data4democracy.substack.com
Hook and Squeeze
How Democratic consultants, committees, and party leaders built a fundraising spam pipeline that funnels money from a captive pool of elderly donors into their own operations.
17745331583
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
John V. Kane @uptonorwell.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
🚨Super excited to share this new WP with Joohye Jeong, @adamberinsky.bsky.social, Soong & Parker. We ask a simple but extremely practical Q for survey researchers: 𝐃𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐬/𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐲? Answer: Not really, no. 👍
14219
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Drew Engelhardt @amengel.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
Reminds me of this nifty piece from Trexler and Johnston on ideological labels. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
An Ideology by Any Other Name - Political Behavior
The terms ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ are prominent features of political discourse in the United States, and many citizens choose to identify with one of these ideological labels. Yet, many citizens...
052
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
mark brandt @mjbsp.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
New pub, led by Aymin Triki & in collab w/ @abbycassario.bsky.social, accepted at JESP! We found similarities in party cues among the left and the right when using representative samples of issues, although right-wing authoritarians may be an exception Other interesting findings follow!
Abstract of paper. It reads, How do people with different political ideologies process political information? Party cues are an
effect where people are more likely to support a policy position if they learn their party also
supports it, shifting their judgement in accordance with cues from their inparty and against their
outparty. This effect has been at the center of the debate over the psychological differences
between liberals and conservatives, with some scholars suggesting that differences in cognitive
styles between liberals and conservatives (e.g., rigidity, cognitive reflection) should result in
differences in party cue susceptibility. We advance this debate by measuring rigid cognitive
styles and applying a stimuli sampling approach to party cues across four preregistered
experiments (N’s per study > 1200). We found convincing evidence for ideological symmetries
in party cues in quota matched samples of Americans (Studies 1 & 2). In Studies 3 and 4, across
four measures of ideology and three self-report measures of cognitive rigidity, we found
ideological differences in self-reported rigidity in line with previous research. In Study 3, a
convenience sample, we found that conservatives were more likely to follow party cues.
However, Study 4, using a quota matched sample, found no ideological differences in cue
susceptibility, except with respect to right-wing authoritarianism. Exploratory analyses found
that when one group has greater prior awareness or stronger initial views on a topic, they show
smaller cueing effects. We conclude that while liberals and conservatives differ in cognitive
style, they largely share similar cognitive processes for interpreting and integrating political
information.
12212
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 18/07/2026
We need to change norms around sexual harassment Yesterday Tessa West spoke up about a sexual harassment complaint she filed against John Jost. Not only is he a senior colleague in the dept of psychology, but he is one of the most prominant figures in the field of social and political psychology.
322484
Andrew Trexler @atrexler.com · 18/07/2026
I had a joke about Lethe, but I forget how it goes.
031
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
American Political Science Review @apsrjournal.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
From our FirstView: New Evidence and Design Considerations for Repeated Measure Experiments in Survey Research by @dianamejordan.bsky.social, TRENT OLLERENSHAW and @atrexler.com. doi.org/10.1017/S000....
02616
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Lauren (Palladino) Olson @lrpalladino.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
My first-ever solo-authored paper is out today (open access!) in @journalrep.bsky.social! What drives Americans to switch their presidential vote based on race over the last 3 elections? I show that it's not general racial warmth, it's changing beliefs about discrimination. (🧵 1/3)
12110
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Petter Törnberg @pettertornberg.com · 07/07/2026
‘Polarization’ has become the master concept for diagnosing our current democratic crisis. But this is not polarization. It is the radicalization of the political right. By misdiagnosing it, we risk becoming complicit in the crisis. 🧵 Just out in Perspectives on Politics doi.org/10.1017/S153...
4834451428
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
LSE US Politics and Policy blog - USAPP @lseusablog.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
Expanding mail voting in 2020 helped more people in all racial groups to vote by mail, but its effect on government trust is less clear find @maraynam.bsky.social , @atrexler.com and @profsorelle.bsky.social blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/20...
blogs.lse.ac.uk
Expanding mail voting in 2020 helped more people in all racial groups to vote by mail, but its effect on government trust is less clear | LSE United States Politics and Policy
Expanded access to mail voting increased people’s decisions to cast their ballots by mail across all racial groups.
002
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Nature Human Behaviour @nathumbehav.nature.com · 22/06/2026
Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples
dlvr.it
Representativeness and response validity across nine opt-in online samples
Nature Human Behaviour, Published online: 22 June 2026; doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02438-zStagnaro et al. compare nine opt-in participant samples on measures of response validity, representativeness and professionalism. They find substantial variation across samples and offer guidance for choosing samples based on the research question.
02512
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Barry Burden @bcburden.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
My department @uwpolisci.bsky.social is hiring an assistant professor with expertise in environmental politics jobs.wisc.edu/jobs/assista...
jobs.wisc.edu
Assistant Professor of Political Science - RISE EARTH - Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Current Employees: If you are currently employed at any of the Universities of Wisconsin, log in to Workday to apply through the internal application process.Job Category:FacultyEmployment Type:Regula...
022
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
turgut keskintürk @tkeskinturk.bsky.social · 18/06/2026
a new working paper with Chris Johnston & @stephenvaisey.com! we study issue opinions among a novel sample of 10-12-year-olds, showing that children, contrary to received wisdom, express reasonably structured preferences. a working paper here: tkeskinturk.github.io/poldevelopment.pdf
The Emerging Structure of Political Preferences in Childhood

Turgut Keskintürk, Christopher D. Johnston, Stephen Vaisey

June, 2026

Research on political development has largely overlooked the opinions children form before adolescence, and paid even less attention to their views on specific issues. In this article, we present an original survey of children aged 10 to 12, conducted in 2024–2025, that measures children’s opinions on several policy issues alongside evaluations of the 2024 presidential candidates and the two major parties. To situate children’s responses in context, we benchmark children against one of their parents, surveyed concurrently, and against the 2024 American National Election Study. We find that children express policy opinions more often than they identify with a party, that these opinions organize along the same left-right axis as adults, if less tightly, and that evaluations of candidates and parties anchor this emerging structure. These findings suggest that children form issue opinions far earlier than scholars have assumed, calling for renewed attention to childhood as a formative and consequential site of political development.
28135
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Genevieve Bates @genbates.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
🚨 🚨Calling all #polisky grad students who presented at #ISA2026: I'm chairing the committee for the Human Rights Section’s Steven C Poe best grad student paper award. We are currently accepting nominations, including self-nominations, and all you have to do is email your paper to me!
154
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Barry Burden @bcburden.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
My department is hiring an assistant professor in political theory with a focus on American political thought and/or American constitutionalism jobs.wisc.edu/jobs/assista...
jobs.wisc.edu
Assistant Professor of Political Science - Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Current Employees: If you are currently employed at any of the Universities of Wisconsin, log in to Workday to apply through the internal application process.Job Category:FacultyEmployment Type:Regula...
0107
Andrew Trexler @atrexler.com · 12/06/2026
Seeing lots of "voters are dumb" takes on this, Converse laser-eyes, etc. Consider the survey-taking experience. Ppl see/interpret these individually and give atomized answers. Q1: What will make Ds electable? Move to center. Q2: Is D party radical? No. Q3: Your personal view? Socialism = good.
151
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Ross Dahlke @rossdahlke.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
New work with @ryanmoore.bsky.social in @digitaljournalism.bsky.social examines Americans' exposure to Pink Slime websites--partisan websites that masquerade as local news--and compares consumption levels to untrustworthy and genuine local news websites doi.org/10.1080/2167...
2125
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Jon Green @jongreen.bsky.social · 19/05/2026
new WP (w/ @ntd.bsky.social): we use the case of Christian nationalism to make a broader point about "niche ideologies" in mass opinion research, and why you shouldn't scale them the same way you'd scale more general attitudes Link: osf.io/wbdut/files/...
Title: Niche Ideologies in the Mass Public: The Case of
Christian Nationalism
Authors: Jon Green, Nick Davis
Abstract: It is common in survey research to measure political attitudes by inferring latent dimensions along which all respondents can be scored. We argue that this approach is ill-suited for the study of “niche ideologies” that organize the beliefs of concentrated minorities within specific political domains. We support this argument with the case of Christian nationalism, which is theorized as an ideology but typically measured as an attitude. Across two survey samples, we show that response patterns are better explained by a process in which individuals endorse, reject, or are unfamiliar with clusters of beliefs associated with Christian nationalism than by processes in which responses are dimensional. We then demonstrate that measuring Christian
nationalism as an attitude can distort its relationship with theoretically relevant policy preferences. Our results clarify distinctions between attitudes and ideologies and offer suggestions for how to investigate other niche ideologies in mass opinion research.Figure 1. Distributions of Posterior Probabilities by DGP. Group-based is strongly preferred (higher probabilities for vast majority of respondents) in both BRS and PRRI samples.Figure 3: Ideological identification by DGP. The Rejecter group is majority liberal across both samples with few conservatives; the Adherent group is majority conservative across both samples with few liberals.Figure 6: Comparing group- versus dimensional-based estimates of the relationship between Christian nationalism and abortion attitudes (PRRI 2022). All models control for age, education, race, gender, party identification, and ideological identification.

When Christian nationalism is measured as a single dimension factor, it has positive relationships with both support for overturning Roe v. Wade and for more restrictive abortion policy. But when Christian nationalism is measured via a group-based mixture, being in the Adherent (vs. Innocent) group is only positively associated with more restrictive abortion policy, but not with support for overturning Roe v. Wade.
24926
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 12/05/2026
#OpenAccess from @journalrep.bsky.social - Election Administration and Voting Behavior among Americans of Color - cup.org/3PhctC0 - @maraynam.bsky.social, @atrexler.com & @profsorelle.bsky.social #FirstView
Logo of JREP with the hashtag OpenAccess on a grey background dotted with red circles.
023
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
American Political Science Review @apsrjournal.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
From our FirstView: Threats and Commitments: International Tribunals and Domestic Trials in Peace Negotiations by @genbates.bsky.social. doi.org/10.1017/S000...
062
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Alexander Wuttke @kunkakom.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
Cumulative science at its best.
141
Andrew Trexler @atrexler.com · 24/04/2026
Thrilled to announce my paper with @dianamejordan.bsky.social & sky-less Trent Ollerenshaw is now published open-access at @apsrjournal.bsky.social. In a (very) large replication & extension, we show that design effects of repeated measure experiments are nonzero but typically small. Thread:
Abstract for "New Evidence and Design Considerations for Repeated Measure Experiments in Survey Research" by Diana Jordan, Trent Ollerenshaw, and Andrew Trexler, published in the American Political Science Review. The abstract text reads: "We re-examine recent influential claims that repeated measure experimental designs offer large precision gains without biasing treatment effect estimates in survey research. We test these claims by experimentally varying the design of six classic political science experiments across three distinct large samples of U.S. adults (total N = 13,163). In contrast to prior evidence, we observe consistent attenuation of treatment effects in repeated measure designs. However, we show in simulations that this average design effect is small enough, and the precision gains large enough, that we recommend repeated measure designs for broad application—though (large-N) post-only designs may be preferable when research priorities include estimating the precise magnitude of a treatment effect. We additionally explore how several design considerations affect the bias-precision trade-off, such as within-subject versus between-groups designs, the relative separation of repeated measures within single surveys, and differences in respondent characteristics across sample types."
45228
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
British Journal of Political Science @bjpols.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
From February 2026 - The Unequal Challenge of Learning from Under-Informative News - cup.org/461vHAT "findings shed light on the importance of considering heterogeneous preferences along ethnicities within the same racial ‘in-group’" - @atrexler.com #OpenAccess
BJPolS abstract discussing political news consumption. It highlights the dependency of outlets on audience preferences, with coverage focusing on partisan conflict and specialized jargon.
042
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Jon Green @jongreen.bsky.social · 03/04/2026
extremely happy to share that "Political Pundits and the Maintenance of Ideological Coalitions" is conditionally accepted at @polbehavior.bsky.social osf.io/8c3fr/files/...
Title: Political Pundits and the Maintenance of Ideological Coalitions
Authors: Allison Wan and Jon Green
Abstract: Political ideologies help groups advance diverse sets of interests under common agendas. However, it is unclear how these groups maintain their norms regarding what it means to be
a member in good standing in a dynamic information environment. Building on theories of “long” political coalitions, we hypothesize that ideological elites’ rhetorical influence on one another will tend to be concentrated and specialized with respect to specific concepts. We
find support for this expectation using an original dataset of over 1,000 prominent political pundits in the United States, in which we infer coalition membership and the diffusion of novel language over a range of specific concepts. While pundits may discuss many concepts,
they tend to “send” language to other pundits in relatively few, resulting in both concentration and specialization of influence within coalitions. These results clarify conceptual distinctions between political ideologies and political philosophies, and demonstrate real-time dynamics of contemporary ideological coalitions.Figure 1: Stylized expectations. Each node reflects a hypothetical coalition member, colors denote concepts, and arrows indicate members’ influence on each other. For example, member (a) influences members (b), (c), and (e) with respect to one concept, such as immigration, while member (d) influences members (b), (c), and (e) with respect to a different concept, such as health care. Member (e) acts as a broker, both sending and receiving influence across the coalition. Every member is influential, but influence tends to be concentrated (for any given concept, one member accounts for 3/4 of influence) and specialized (4/5 members are influential on only one concept).Figure 3: Concentration of influence within concepts, observed network compared to permuted networks. Degree, Community, and Concept denote structural features either are or are not preserved in network permutations.Figure 4: Specialization of influence within concepts, observed network compared to permuted networks. Degree, Community, and Concept denote structural features either are or are not preserved in network permutations.
02611
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Erika Franklin Fowler @efranklinfowler.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
We’re hiring — help us spread the word! @tnridout.bsky.social @mikefranz.bsky.social
0812
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
APSA & ICA Political Communication Divisions @polcomm.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
The APSA Political Communication section is accepting nominations for its annual awards. Please send nominations directly to the chair of each committee. 🔎 More details on awards, committee, and eligibility criteria: politicalcommunication.org/awards/
049
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Christopher Barrie @cbarrie.bsky.social · 25/02/2026
🧵on my new paper "Synthetic personas distort the structure of human belief systems" w Roberto Cerina I'm v excited about... 🚨 Do synthetic samples look like human samples? We compare 28 LLMs to the 2024 General Social Survey (GSS) to find out + develop host of diagnostics...
618282
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Andrew Mercer @awmercer.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
Exciting news! We just posted an opening for a Survey Associate on @pewresearch.org's Methods team! This is an amazing opportunity for someone relatively early in their career to join what is, IMO, the most fun methods team in the business. Full description at the link below.
pewtrusts.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com
Survey Associate, Methodology
Pew Research Center Organization Overview Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It conducts publi...
13241
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Drew Engelhardt @amengel.bsky.social · 25/02/2026
New w/@scottclifford.bsky.social. Lots of work uses agree-disagree scales, and a lit review shows these are 1) frequently just measured in one direction (agree = higher trait) and 2) correlated with each other. This has potentially big issues for conclusions. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
Acquiescence Bias and Criterion Validity: Problems and Potential Solutions for Agree-Disagree Scales - Political Behavior
Political Behavior - Scholars frequently measure dispositions like populism, conspiracism, racism, and sexism by asking survey respondents whether they agree or disagree with statements...
411249
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Alessandro Nai @alessandronai.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
🚨 Just a handful of days left, DL March 1!🚨 🔥 Walter Lippmann Award for Best Published Article in the field of political communication (2025)🔥 SELF NOMINATIONS WELCOME & EASY: Just send me email with article @apsa.bsky.social @polcomm.bsky.social @ecpr-polcom.bsky.social @ascor.bsky.social 👇
014
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Mackenzie Lockhart @maclockhart.bsky.social · 18/02/2026
🚨 New paper out at @ajpseditor.bsky.social 🚨 Do the public hold meaningful attitudes? Using the case of abortion policy preferences, we provide strong evidence that policy prefrences can be coherent, stable over time, and causally explain vote choice. doi.org/10.1111/ajps...
11815
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Philine Widmer @phinifa.bsky.social · 18/02/2026
Can feed algorithms shape what people think about politics? Our paper "The Political Effects of X's Feed Algorithm" is out today in Nature and answers "Yes." www.nature.com/articles/s41...
4273129
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Adam Berinsky @adamberinsky.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
I'm teaching a few survey research courses live and online. First, a free one hour seminar. Feb 20 instats.org/seminar/surv... Then a set of two (half) day courses. Not free (sorry!). -Intro Surveys (Feb 26-27): instats.org/seminar/intr... -Advanced Surveys (March 5-6): instats.org/seminar/adva...
12217
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Soeren Henn @soerenhenn.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
🧵 New paper out in AJPS! "Seeing like a citizen: Experimental evidence on how empowerment affects engagement with the state" With @lbp2106.bsky.social, @wilsonprichard.bsky.social, @cdsamii.bsky.social, and Raúl Sánchez de la Sierra. doi.org/10.1111/ajps... 1/11
doi.org
American Journal of Political Science | MPSA Journal | Wiley Online Library
Building a strong and effective state requires revenue. Yet, in many low-income countries, citizens do not make formal payments to the state or forego engaging with the state altogether due to vulner....
2309
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Benjamin Toff @benjamintoff.bsky.social · 15/02/2026
Congrats @atrexler.com! There is a major disconnect between what newsrooms think people want—often based on metrics about the highly engaged audiences they are currently serving—and what the public actually needs to make sense of political phenomena. Such important work!
161
Andrew Trexler @atrexler.com · 12/02/2026
Very excited to see this out at @bjpols.bsky.social! In this article, I show that contemporary political news coverage makes it challenging for readers to learn information that is helpful for democratic accountability, even for very politically engaged audiences. A brief summary:
12919
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
British Journal of Political Science @bjpols.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
NEW - The Unequal Challenge of Learning from Under-Informative News - cup.org/461vHAT - @atrexler.com #OpenAccess
BJPolS abstract discussing political news consumption. It highlights the dependency of outlets on audience preferences, with coverage focusing on partisan conflict and specialized jargon.
0146
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Alex Coppock @aecoppock.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
🎺 Call for proposals 🎺 1️⃣ replicate an existing experiment 2️⃣ run a novel experiment on repdata.com 3️⃣ coauthor with Mary McGrath and me to meta-analyze the replications and existing studies 4️⃣ publish your study details: alexandercoppock.com/replication_... applications open Feb 1 please repost!
Call for Proposals: Data Collection for
Replication+Novel Political Science Survey Experiments
Alexander Coppock and Mary McGrath
January 27, 2026
We invite proposals for a survey experiment replication+novel design competition. Se-
lected replication+novel design survey experiments will be conducted on large samples of
American respondents, quota sampled to match U.S. Census margins and filtered for quality
and attention by the survey sample provider Rep Data (repdata.com).
Each proposal consists of two parts: (1) a replication study of an existing, previously
published survey experiment, and (2) a novel experimental design on a topic of the authors’
choosing.
The replication studies and reanalyses of the existing studies will be combined into a
meta-paper to be co-authored by all authors of accepted proposals along with the princi-
pal investigators (Coppock and McGrath). As a condition for acceptance, authors commit
to sharing the data and producing a write-up of the findings from their novel design for
submission to a scholarly journal, and public posting of a working paper pre-publication.
08071
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Policy Studies Journal @psjeditor.bsky.social · 21/01/2026
BLOG POST! Explore the latest PSJ blog post examining how expanded mail voting relates to voter access, political efficacy, and trust in government. By Andrew Trexler, Marayna Martinez & Mallory E. SoRelle Read here: psjblog.net/2026/01/21/v... #PSJ #PolicyStudiesJournal
psjblog.net
Voting access reforms and policy feedback effects on political efficacy and trust
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced states to rethink election administration across the United States. To make voting safer, many states expanded mail voting options like no-excuse absentee voti…
032
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Scott Clement @sfcpoll.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
So cool -> Quebec researchers tracked eye dilation + sweat when showing respondents political issues to see if they aligned with results from standard poll questions on issue importance. They did! And suggest asking people to choose their top issue is most reliable academic.oup.com/poq/article/...
2269
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Josh McCrain @joshmccrain.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
new paper by Sean Westwood: With current technology, it is impossible to tell whether survey respondents are real or bots. Among other things, makes it easy for bad actors to manipulate outcomes. No good news here for the future of online-based survey research
38770390
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Drew Engelhardt @amengel.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
Working on a dissertation in American political behavior and need money for survey research? Apply for a grant worth up to $15,000 from the Rapoport Family Foundation. They’re planning on awarding up to 15 grants this cycle. Deadline Oct. 22. www.rapoportfamilyfoundation.com/phdgrant
rapoportfamilyfoundation.com
Rapoport Doctoral Dissertation Grants
Supporting projects for PhD students doing political science research, democracy and social justice.
02325
Reposted by Andrew Trexler
Tiago Ventura @tiagoventura.bsky.social · 07/10/2025
How common are “survey professionals” - people who take dozens of online surveys for pay - across online panels, and do they harm data quality? Our paper, FirstView at @politicalanalysis.bsky.social, tackles this question using browsing data from three U.S. samples (Facebook, YouGov, and Lucid):
413554