Sign in

Paul Meiners

@pmeiners.bsky.social
848 followers 648 following 67 posts

Postdoctoral Researcher @ The Norwegian University of Science and Technology; International Organizations, the EU & Political Psychology pmeiners.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Stefanie Walter @stefwalter.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Have you ever wondered about what we know about the broad patterns, the causes, and the consequences of contestation of IOs? We – @jonastallberg.bsky.social, Michael Zürn and I – did and therefore set out to take stock of the state of the art. Our review is out now in @iojournal.bsky.social.
cambridge.org
Contestation of International Organizations: Patterns, Drivers, and Responses | International Organization | Cambridge Core
Contestation of International Organizations: Patterns, Drivers, and Responses
12412
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Sabrina J. Mayer @sabrinajmayer.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Es gibt soviel Forschung und dabei noch mehr Halbwissen -- ein studienbasierter Überblick mit möglichen Stellschrauben gegen die Erfolge radikal-rechter Parteien.
0154
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Yeah, I feel like participation was a much more central topic in the 2000-2010s.
011
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
absolutely not being serious here
020
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
Just ask an LLM, ezpz problem solved
210
Reposted by Paul Meiners
D. Hicks @danhicks.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
This is an incomplete understanding of academic freedom, and partly confuses academic freedom with freedom of speech. (🧵 adapting some things from this paper, esp. §5: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/28499/. Highly recommend the papers by Dea and Kronfeldner that I cite there!)
philsci-archive.pitt.edu
412141
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Ben Recht @beenwrekt.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
The arms race of deferring agency and the dark acquiescence to robotic bureaucracy.
argmin.net
The Least Agentic People Alive
The arms race of deferring agency and the dark acquiescence to robotic bureaucracy.
2339
Reposted by Paul Meiners
vincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
In 2023, @nature.com published 'Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time', receiving world-wide media attention. Our Matters Arising, published after a 32 month delay (more on that soon), shows that the reported decline can largely be attributed to dataset artefacts. 🧵
The average CD_5 index per year for Web of Science. The original Park et al. decline (top curve) becomes essentially flat (bottom curve) when removing papers with CD_5=1. Those papers largely correspond to dataset artefacts.
9352173
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Danbischof @danbischof.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
📄 New working paper out: osf.io/preprints/so... We (@thiloalbers.bsky.social @felixkersting.bsky.social and Fabian Kosse) try to understand why some citizens who are objectively well off still feel left behind, and why this matters for populist attitudes.
24818
Reposted by Paul Meiners
jon ben-menachem @jbenmenachem.com · 05/08/2026
Frankly, I don’t think frontier models should be used for research at all. Must be an “archivable” model (open weight or open source) that will be available indefinitely for reanalysis.
3172
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Tim Bale @timbale.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
This by @jamesrdennison.bsky.social and @andrewpgeddes.bsky.social looks brilliant - and very timely! global.oup.com/academic/pro...
New book - cover - 'What Europeans Think About Immigration and Why It Matters'
13110
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Dan Silverman @dmsilverman.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Surveys like this always alarm people Fortunately, recent research from cognitive psychology shows that the reason people are so wildly wrong when estimating the size of minority groups is largely NOT because of prejudice — but rather how humans think about unknown proportions of any kind
111543
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Adam Berinsky @adamberinsky.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
Boy this was a long road, but glad it's finally out! @dgrand.bsky.social @robbwiller.bsky.social @arechar.bsky.social (along with Michael N. Stagnaro, James N. Druckman, not tagable)
05524
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Kevin Collins @kwcollins.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Someone compiled all of the Calvin and Hobbes strips about Calvin’s polls of his Dad, which is proof that good people do exist on the internet imgur.com/a/poll-resul...
imgur.com
Poll results for Calvin's Dad
Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and ...
10532145
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Andrea Vik @andreavik.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
New publication! Unelected representation may influence how satisfied people are with democracy, opening up important discussions on the role activists play in shaping the legitimacy of liberal representative democracies. You can find out more below 👇
052
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Claes de Vreese @claesdevreese.bsky.social · 11/04/2026
🛑 Chatbots are not fit for giving voting advice 🗳️ Latest study from @liberties.eu on the Hungarian election shows lack of transparency and reliability in the advice. Our research shows that 10-15% by now use chatbots for advice, for young voters up to one quarter. www.liberties.eu/en/stories/h...
liberties.eu
Should AI Tell You Who to Vote For?
Open Ai's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini do not provide reliable political guidance on the 2026 Hungarian elections, our latest research finds.
32212
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 07/04/2026
Maybe he’s only talking about post-stratification?
010
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Charles Logan @charleswlogan.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
My university: "Copilot is Microsoft's AI-powered productivity service that uses large language models (LLMs) to help you create content, analyze information, summarize documents, and complete tasks more efficiently." Microsoft: LOL
231489570
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(9/9) Although many Europeans want direct elections of the European Commission, the lead candidate process is unlikely to improve legitimacy perceptions. Without attachment to and engagement with procedural reforms, they might fall flat.
000
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(8/9) Again, we find no evidence for strong backlash against overturning the lead candidate system. Even when fully informed and after adding another procedural reform, respondents do not react strongly.
Treatment effects for both main outcomes. No large differences can be found
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(7/9) As another procedural reform, we add a hypothetical primary in which respondents could choose their own candidate. Then, we varied whether member state governments would refuse to accept the candidate chosen by the newly elected European Parliament, similar to the events in 2019.
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(6/9) In order to differentiate between these explanations, we ran a survey experiment right before the European elections in 2024. We showed respondents different scenarios how their vote might matter.
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(5/9) Looking at survey data collected right before and right after, we find no evidence of a strong backlash. There are three possible explanations: 1. Europeans were not sufficiently informed. 2. The process is not important to Europeans. 3. Europeans were never attached to the candidates.
A: Marginal treatment effects on satisfaction with the process of the EC president selection, 95% confidence intervals. B: Marginal treatment effects on satisfaction with the way democracy works in the EU, 95% confidence intervals. We find no meaningful effects.
110
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(4/9) We argue that this came as a surprise to European voters. The sudden nomination of von der Leyen is our "unexpected event" that allows us to test how attached citizens are to the process. If citizens cared a lot, we would expect to see a negative reaction.
We examined Google search interest and Wikipedia page views for von der Leyen around the time of the 2019 European elections. There was a clear spike in attention when she was nominated.
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(3/9) We first take a look at the failure of the process after the European elections in 2019. Back then, von der Leyen was chosen by the EU member states to be their candidate for the head of the commission, even though she was never in the running during the electoral campaigns.
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(2/9) The key idea here is that a lead candidate system increases the alignment between citizens' democratic expectations and institutional reality. However, if these procedures are not followed through, they could have a negative effect on legitimacy perceptions.
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
(1/9) Can the EU be seen as more legitimate through procedural reforms? The lead candidate system for president of the European Commission was one such attempt. In a new article, @acgoldberg.bsky.social, @pieterdewilde.bsky.social and I have sobering results: doi.org/10.1017/S147... #polisky #EUsky
doi.org
The role of procedural fairness in EU legitimacy: Lessons from the Spitzenkandidaten process | European Journal of Political Research | Cambridge Core
The role of procedural fairness in EU legitimacy: Lessons from the Spitzenkandidaten process
193
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Judging from what I've read, this is already the new norm.
000
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 29/03/2026
(4/4) There isn't much data on attitudes toward aggressive or retributive economic measures (especially in Europe). It would be interesting to see how the situation develops as China uses its economic weight more and more.
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 29/03/2026
(3/4) In a survey experiment, we tried a few framing alternatives, but they did not significantly affect the overall results.
Average treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals from a 2x2 factorial experiment. Only the high cost treatment has a (small) effect on support for trade sanctions against China.
110
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 29/03/2026
(2/4) Despite ongoing geopolitical tensions between the US and China, Europeans may not perceive themselves as being on one "side" or the other. Even those who want to increase trade with the US do not necessarily support restrictions on trade with China.
Bar chart showing support for trade restrictions against China against support for trade with China and support for trade with the US.
100
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 29/03/2026
(1/4) Marius Dotzauer and I recently published a paper examining Europeans' attitudes towards trade restrictions against China. In five EU member states, we find only limited support: doi.org/10.1080/0969... #polisky #ipesky #OA
doi.org
Enter the trade war? European public opinion on trade restrictions against China
This paper investigates how geopolitical factors shape individual preferences for export controls, focusing on EU–China trade in high-technology sectors. Supporters of a tougher stance toward China...
120
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Matt Blackwell @mattblackwell.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
mariozechner.at/posts/2026-0...
Text from linked article “There's a much more important difference between clanker and hu-man. A human is a bottleneck. A human cannot shit out 20,000 lines of code in a few hours. Even if the human creates such booboos at high frequency, there's only so many booboos the human can introduce in a codebase per day. The booboos will compound at a very slow rate.
Usually, if the booboo pain gets too big, the human, who hates pain, will spend some time fixing up the booboos. Or the human gets fired and someone else fixes up the booboos. So the pain goes away.
With an orchestrated army of agents, there is no bottleneck, no human pain. These tiny little harmless booboos suddenly compound at a rate that's unsustainable. You have removed yourself from the loop, so you don't even know that all the innocent booboos have formed a monster of a codebase. You only feel the pain when it's too late.
0257
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
Great overview. I assume exchangeability is important here, right (wasn't mentioned explicitly in the post)?
110
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Nathaniel Haines @natehaines.bsky.social · 15/03/2026
New blog just dropped! This one is all about estimators—we cover James-Stein, classical test theory, empirical Bayes, penalized regression, and hierarchical models, showing how they all can be used to do a better job than sample stats alone 🤓 haines-lab.com/post/how-to-...
haines-lab.com
How to Estimate a Mean, and What It Means for Science | Computational Psychology
Introduction If I asked you to estimate 30 means, you would probably compute 30 sample means. And you would be provably wrong (well.. maybe not wrong, but at least provably inefficient).
56524
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 14/03/2026
I mean, if you take away the CIs, it’s just low-tech EDA. Loop over all bivariate regressions, find the biggest R2 difference between linear and squared model.
010
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Jason Koebler @jasonkoebler.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
I met with AI data labelers in Kenya who are organizing their colleagues to fight the brutal working conditions and horrible pay given to the workers at the "bottom of the AI supply chain." They believe the NDAs they've signed are unenforceable so are speaking out: www.404media.co/ai-is-africa...
404media.co
'AI Is African Intelligence': The Workers Who Train AI Are Fighting Back
Kenyan workers are still the underpaid labor behind AI training, moderation, and sex chatbots. The Data Labelers Association is fighting back.
3563193016
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Per Engzell @pengzell.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
Strictly speaking, a postdoc is just a doc who posts
67212
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Olli Bäckström @ollibackstrom.bsky.social · 02/03/2026
I'm not gonna lie: Macron and his generals singing the Marseillaise to a nuclear weapon is a bit chilling.
1022943
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
This could be an inspiration: arxiv.org/abs/2505.035...
Partially directed SWIG assumed to generate data for a cannonical 2x2 DID.
011
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Grant McDermott @gmcd.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
I think the main issue is that many people, quite reasonably tbf, don't like the default base data.frame print method... But this is easy to override! gist.github.com/grantmcdermo...
A nicer print.data.frame method showing column types, as well as a subset of rows. Inspired by data.table's print method.
0195
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Kevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
Arendt suggests Eichmann is a clown *rather than* a monster. But why not both—a clown AND a monster? It seems to me a key part of the horror of fascism is precisely its pervasive clownishness. There's a mind-rending indignity in having to take seriously rulers who are fundamentally unserious.
813829
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Dr Stylite @columnist.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
The art of politics is not to do what people think. If it was, there literally wouldn’t be any politics. The art of politics is to convert public opinion in the direction of your policies. Not so subordinate your policies to opinion.
22788138
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Isabella Rebasso @isabellareb.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
🎉 New paper out in Political Behavior (with @gijsschumacher.bsky.social & @mrooduijn.bsky.social) Why do some people feel stronger emotions about politics than others? 💡Not political knowledge, but interest and confidence-in-knowledge drive emotional engagement. link.springer.com/article/10.1... 🧵
link.springer.com
Disentangling the Sophistication-Emotion Link: Political Interest and Confidence-in-Knowledge, but not Knowledge, Drive Emotional Responses - Political Behavior
Why do some people feel stronger emotions about politics than others? Past work suggests that political sophistication, consisting of knowledge and interest, is related to feeling strong emotions abou...
38228
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Cyrus Samii @cdsamii.bsky.social · 03/12/2025
A blog post giving a more thorough take on survey experiments and the credibility revolution: cyrussamii.com?p=4168
cyrussamii.com
Survey experiments and the credibility revolution – Cyrus Samii
67737
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Alexander Wuttke @kunkakom.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
The billions of research funds channeled into the pockets of Elsevier and other commercial publisher in return for very little actual value is one of academia's big inefficiencies that will eventually be replaced by more attractive Community-run alternatives
05119
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Python Software Foundation @python.org · 27/10/2025
TLDR; The PSF has made the decision to put our community and our shared diversity, equity, and inclusion values ahead of seeking $1.5M in new revenue. Please read and share. pyfound.blogspot.com/2025/10/NSF-... 🧵
python.org
The official home of the Python Programming Language
12363772727
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Matt Graham @mattgraham.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
After a huge post-election flip in economic perceptions, I thought Democrats and Republicans might be lying to pollsters to send a partisan message — but I was wrong! New in the Journal of Experimental Political Science (open access): doi.org/10.1017/XPS....
39241
Paul Meiners @pmeiners.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Don't worry, surely some statistical prediction machine will easily replace them. You just need an intern to speak english to a computer, right?
010
Reposted by Paul Meiners
Sven Hegewald @svenhegewald.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Super happy to see this out in @jeppjournal.bsky.social 🎉🎉
1144