Sign in

Sam Thorpe

@samthorpe.bsky.social
4.6K followers 564 following 388 posts

Researching the economics of inequality, tax, capital flows, and industrial policy. Formerly federal fiscal policy @ Brookings; research + organizing @ UChicago.

PostsRepliesMedia
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
The Supreme Court just made it even easier for billionaires to buy elections. Good coverage here of the implications of the ruling: it will disproportionately benefit Republican groups, and make it even harder for a future administration to regulate Super PAC and dark money spending.
nytimes.com
The Supreme Court Just Gave the G.O.P. a New Midterm Edge
130
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Joe Fish @sadbusdriver.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
This is a pretty bad misquote. The actual quote and what the graph says is that the *share* of total wealth has only increased for the top 0.1% of US households. But *total* and *per capita* wealth has increased for every group
1113
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Jake Grumbach @jakemgrumbach.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
Wealth concentration was already way off the rails before Musk became a trillionaire. The wealthiest megabillionaires in the country have basically been doubling their wealth annually in recent years. Feels near impossible to maintain a liberal democracy in this kind of situation.
271039309
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Noah Rosenblum @narosenblum.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
When admin scholars talk about the Court’s attack on functional government, we have in mind not just high profile cases like Cook and Slaughter, but rulings like today’s decision in FCC v ATT. Decisions like this and — what they reveal — are death by 1000 cuts. 1/8
supremecourt.gov
26337
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Angus Bylsma @angusbylsma.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
This week’s review!—back to Daunton, this time on the demolition of Bretton Woods and the potential lessons within. A guest post by the brilliant @samthorpe.bsky.social.
open.substack.com
Slouching Towards Liberalization
The Economic Government of the World, Martin Daunton, 2023 (Pt.II).
073
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
New from me, on the wonderful @angusbylsma.bsky.social's blog: an essay about the collapse of Bretton Woods and the possibility of building such a system anew today, and a review of Martin Daunton’s comprehensive history of The Economic Government of the World.
unevenandcombinedthoughts.substack.com
Slouching Towards Liberalization
The Economic Government of the World, Martin Daunton, 2023 (Pt.II).
152
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Kevin Rinz @kevinrinz.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
New working paper out today for the real UI heads, from me and David Wasser: ⬆️ UI generosity - ⬆️ wages - for UE, J2J, and EE workers - especially at the bottom - ⬇️ hiring from U - ⬇️ LF exit - maybe ⬇️ job postings - ⬆️ posted wages - ⬆️ new entrant hiring - and more!
11910
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 25/05/2026
As usual, incredibly thoughtful stuff from Maia. I found the arguments (referencing Andrew Caplin's new paper) about the shift in costs from 'finding information' to 'asking questions and directing inquiry' particularly interesting. Great pairing with the new papal encyclical.
100
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 16/05/2026
Against my better judgement, I've finally started a (free) Substack. As I explain in my first post, I see this as an avenue to write on some of the big questions that economics research isn't well-suited to: normative claims, historical work, and thinking about the roots of economic analysis.
thestockexchangeandtheholygrail.substack.com
Kicking things off
About me, about this blog
171
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 31/03/2026
A fun bit of history: this is the conclusion of Ben Bernanke's speech on the occasion of Milton Friedman's 90th birthday. (Delivered in 2002!) www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/sp...
010
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Bobby Kogan @bbkogan.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
New from me: by the end of the week, the war in Iran will likely have cost $25 billion, with Trump poised to ask for $200 billion more Below is a writeup, but the meat of it is this table, which shows what an equal amount of funding could cover domestically www.americanprogress.org/article/by-t...
What the cost of the Iran war could cover if used differently
Select services and how many more people they could support with funding equivalent to what is being spent on Iran war

Table with 6 columns and 6 rows.
People covered by Medicaid for a year	Children receiving free school lunch for a school year	People housed in Section 8 for a year	Children covered for year of child care	Adults with free tuition at community college for a two-year associate degree
$25 billion
Estimated likely cost of war as of March 26, 2026
3,106,000	29,614,000	3,147,000	1,780,000	2,865,000
$200 billion
Reported likely request for additional war funding
24,850,000	Every child in the United States, with >$170B left over	Every eligible person, with >$60B left over	14,237,000	22,917,000
One 30,000-pound bomb	625	5,925	625	350	575
One Tomahawk missile	275	2,600	275	150	250
One THAAD missile	1,575	15,050	1,600	900	1,450
One Patriot interceptor	500	4,850	525	300	475
17518283
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Bill Gale @billgale.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
In our new paper, colleagues from @taxpolicycenter.bsky.social and I offer a preliminary assessment of OBBBA, covering what it changed and what its effects will be on the budget, the economy, distributional outcomes, and future fiscal policy. taxpolicycenter.org/research-rep...
taxpolicycenter.org
One Big Beautiful Bill? A Preliminary Assessment
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025” (OBBBA), signed into law July 4, 2025, is a sweeping tax-and-spending package that could reshape federal fiscal policy for decades to come.
052
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
A stylized fact that was new to me: the amount of gold (measured by weight) held by central banks barely changed through late 2025. The reason gold reserves went up so much as a share of non-US central bank holdings had more to do with the rising price of gold than a geopolitics-influenced choice!
100
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 17/03/2026
Really useful thread on housing supply, affordability, and how we should think about elasticities and supply-demand dynamics in the housing market!
021
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Matthew Gertz @mattgertz.bsky.social · 13/03/2026
Defense secretary openly states that a pro-Trump billionaire taking over a news network (following regulatory help from the administration) will result in coverage more favorable for the administration.
13040441322
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
chuckcbpp.bsky.social @chuckcbpp.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
The Van Hollen-Beyer et al tax cut bill was released today so just re-upping our prior thread and adding a few tweets with numbers now that more details are available:
144
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Bobby Kogan @bbkogan.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
$11.3 billion could cover any of the following for a full year: -1.4 million people on Medicaid -19 million kids getting free school lunches -1.4 million people getting affordable housing -1.1 million hungry seniors fed -0.8 million children given free child care
211849789
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Joe Peck @joepeck.co.uk · 02/03/2026
Why didn't the Biden administration get more credit for its investments? In part, because they didn't raise wages or create jobs widely enough or quickly enough. @samthorpe.bsky.social and I examine the political economy of industrial policy across America's energy communities
142
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Mark Copelovitch @mcopelov.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
This elitist view that only rich/Ivy/private school kids should study/have access the liberal arts is so deeply ingrained in so many highly educated Democrats’ views (including tons who majored in the lib arts themselves) that they don’t even realize they hold it, let alone how ugly & elitist it is
311775362
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Jacob Bogage @jacobbogage.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
🚨 SCOOP: The IRS improperly disclosed confidential immigrant tax information to DHS, per sources. It opens up HUGE liability for the US government. Trump is suing the IRS over substantially the same disclosures -- for $10 billion. 🎁 Gift link:
wapo.st
IRS improperly disclosed confidential immigrant tax data to DHS
The tax agency only recently discovered it improperly disclosed tax information on thousands of the wrong people to immigration enforcement.
20879385
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Nicolai von Ondarza @nvondarza.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
This was to be expected - after cutting support to pro-democracy civil society last year, the US state is now looking to actively support far-right affiliated think tanks and charities in Europe.
1418798
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Jake Grumbach @jakemgrumbach.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
We have a Boston Review Forum out today on the Democratic Party in a time of authoritarianism www.bostonreview.net/forum/how-no...
Senator Chuck Schumer conducts a news conference in the U.S. Capitol in May 2025. Image: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
FORUM
How Not to Defeat Authoritarianism
Moderation used to help Democrats win, but its advantages now have been greatly exaggerated.
Adam Bonica, Jake Grumbach
With responses from →
Cori Bush, Amanda Litman, Matthew Yglesias, G.
Elliott Morris, Julia Serano, Eric Rauchway, Suzanne Mettler & Trevor E. Brown, Thomas Ferguson, Timothy Shenk, Jared Abbott & Milan Loewer, Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, Lily Geismer, Danielle Wiggins, William A. Galston, and Henry Burke
18667217
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Brendan Duke @brendanvduke.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
A @budgetmodel.bsky.social analysis of the megabill's combination of tax cuts, cuts to programs, and higher deficits will make the bottom 80 percent of kids born today worse off in the long run.
Bar chart showing lifetime cost of the Republican megabill by income quintile for those born in 2025, including effects of higher federal debt. Four red bars show losses: Bottom 20% loses $17,200, second quintile loses $9,600, middle quintile loses $9,800, fourth quintile loses $4,300. One yellow bar shows the top 20% gains $2,600. Title states "Only households with the highest incomes will gain" and "Households with the lowest incomes lose the most." Source: Penn-Wharton Budget Model, July 8, 2025. Chart by Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
13917
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Brendan Duke @brendanvduke.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
New 25-page @centeronbudget.bsky.social paper from me summarizing the distributional, fiscal, and economic effects of One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts and cuts to health care, food assistance, student loans, and climate investments. 🧵 www.cbpp.org/research/fed...
cbpp.org
Republican Megabill Trades Essential Support to Low-Income People for Skewed Tax Cuts
The sprawling megabill passed by the Republican-controlled Congress and signed by President Trump in July 2025 will redistribute trillions of dollars upward over the next decade, making it harder for ...
315487
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Anna Stansbury @annastansbury.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
📢now forthcoming in ECMA! The Class Gap in Career Progression: Evidence from US Academia Class is rarely a focus of research or DEI in elite US occupations. Evidence suggests it should be: we find a large class gap in at least one occupation - tenure-track academia...🧵
514155
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 25/01/2026
Thinking a lot about this excerpt from Vollmann's Rising Up and Rising Down. It feels like for most of American history - and likely still today - we've lived in a society where force alternates with forbearance, and nonviolence is therefore an incredibly effective tactic for winning change.
140
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Bobby Kogan @bbkogan.bsky.social · 25/01/2026
Lifting this up again. A huge problem now is that there’s a giant slush fund for ICE & CBP separate from annual funding — that Trump can continue to use even during a shutdown. Ds *must* make rescinding those pots of money the price of any future funding deals, as Rs did w/ IRS money from the IRA.
421686
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Chuck Schumer @schumer.senate.gov · 24/01/2026
Senate Democrats will not provide the votes to proceed to the appropriations bill if the DHS funding bill is included.
10974579806
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 24/01/2026
The full video of this shooting is one of the most harrowing things I’ve ever seen. ICE just murdered another American in cold blood. I’m terrified to think about what’s going to happen to our country if this isn’t stopped.
1101
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Benjamin Braun @benbraun.social · 19/01/2026
Financial war in response to trade war and territorial threats? More and more people appear to be calling for it. So I updated my post on U.S. Treasuries holdings—now with the latest data. benjaminbraun.org/posts/treasu...
210650
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
Loved this - thank you for sharing. Excerpt attached was especially compelling. I think one of the biggest issues in academic economics is exactly this class of problems: so many of the most important insights are unquantifiable and therefore ignored. It's a disservice to the profession + the world!
181
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Rafe Meager (they/them) @economeager.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
if i could make you read ONE (1) single post to improve your understanding of the challenges of social science in general it would be this one from @markfabian.bsky.social about wellbeing science specifically profmarkfabian.substack.com/p/airing-my-...
profmarkfabian.substack.com
Airing my grievances with wellbeing science
We have a streetlight problem
119932
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Thor Berger @thorberger.bsky.social · 18/01/2026
Everyone talks about the "credibility revolution", but I think one of the most valuable shifts in econ over the last decade has been the rise of rigorous descriptive historical work like this in top journals:
37414
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Jake Grumbach @jakemgrumbach.bsky.social · 17/01/2026
New QJE for the minimum wage literature uses IRS data to study effects on small and medium size businesses. The effects seem…very good academic.oup.com/qje/article/...
Who's Afraid of the Minimum Wage? Measuring the Impacts on Independent Businesses Using Matched
U.S. Tax Returns* Nirupama L Rao, Max Risch
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 141, Issue 1, February 2026, Pages 373-427, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaf053
Published: 10 December 2025
Article history V
PDF
• Split View
66 Cite P Permissions
< Share V
Abstract
A common concern surrounding minimum wage policies is their impact on independent businesses, which are often feared to be less able to bear or pass on cost increases. We examine how these typically small and medium-size firms accommodate minimum wage increases along product and labor market margins using a matched owner-firm-worker panel data set drawn from the universe of U.S. tax records over a 10-year period, and using state minimum wage changes as identifying variation. We find that on average, firms in highly exposed industries do not substantially reduce employment-they do not lay off workers but moderately reduce part-time hiring. Instead, these firms are able to fully finance the new labor costs with new revenues, leaving average owner profits unchanged.
Higher wage floors, however, forestall entry, particularly for less productive firms, reducing the number of independent firms operating in these industries by roughly 2%. Yet these industries do not shrink; instead, incumbent responses and strong positive selection among entrants reshape industries that rely heavily on low-wage workers, yielding fewer but more productive firms after the cost shock.
We also take a worker-level perspective to examine how potentially vulnerable individuals are affected by minimum wage increases. Using panels of low-earning and young workers, we find that their average earnings rise substantially with the minimum wage, while they are no less likely to be employed. Worker transitions indicate that minimum wage increases boost retention and that worker reallocation from independent firms toward corporations buffers dis…
49433
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Ben Casselman @bencasselman.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
I get this question a lot (not always in such polite language), so worth addressing directly. (Short thread)
14510
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Jennifer Sullivan @jenniferlsullivan.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
The House passed a measure today to extend the Premium Tax Credit enhancements for three years. The bipartisan vote shows there’s strong support for immediate action to make millions of people’s health care more affordable. All eyes are now on the Senate. x.com/JakeSherman/...
11711
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Robert Saunders @robertsaunders.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
"we live in a world … that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world". (Stephen Miller, White House deputy Chief of Staff). This is what that world looks like. The history of freedom is the struggle to constrain power by law
1216577
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Absolutely baffling that mainstream coverage of the Paramount bid for WBD barely alludes to its political dimension. If it goes through, right-wing billionaires will wholly own FOX, CBS, and CNN. This, not antitrust claims, is the reason that Paramount is likely to succeed.
142
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Justin Bloesch @justinbloesch.bsky.social · 01/12/2025
It still seems relevant to compare within, say, 25-34. The ratio of college unemployment to high school unemployment is definitely higher than it has been previously.
141
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Prof Dynarski @dynarski.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
A senior academic using mentoring as leverage to obtain sex is a contemptible abuser of power.
14571126
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
R:e the 'AI bubble,' this analysis of what drove the 1929 bubble from White (1990) feels rather familiar. The difficulty of assessing fundamentals in novel industries + a massive expansion of retail investors + an expansion in credit availability are all seen as providing fuel to the fire.
140
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
Another fantastic new stylized fact from @jburnmurdoch.ft.com - stable or declining NEET rates in many developed economies have been driven by a decline in parenting. The share neither studying, in work, looking for work, *or parenting* has marched up steadily since 2000. www.ft.com/content/bd61...
141
Sam Thorpe @samthorpe.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
Really interesting new paper that changed my priors on recent shifts in college education! In short, strong labor markets explain most of the decline in community college enrollments, while four-year enrollments have actually remained similar. See also www.chalkbeat.org/2025/11/11/i....
193
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Greg Sargent @gregsargent.bsky.social · 05/11/2025
These big wins will embolden Dems to take on Trump's lawbreaking and show there's a price for GOP enabling of him. Folks hate to hear this, but normal patterns are asserting themselves: Liberalism isn't dead, Rs are likely to lose in 2026, and Trump is really unpopular, not a magical exception.
603818655
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Benjamin Braun @benbraun.social · 21/10/2025
The Pentagon “inviting in” private equity “to refurbish some real estate, or even raise financing against the real estate” and to develop “financing tools for the army’s supply chain and overall capex”: surely the apotheosis of long-hegemonic-cycle theory. Arrighi undefeated. on.ft.com/3WPMwcU
24211
Reposted by Sam Thorpe
Bobby Kogan @bbkogan.bsky.social · 15/10/2025
Trump's mechanism to pay the troops during the shutdown is by far the most illegal budgetary action he's taken as POTUS, potentially setting the stage to break everything. It's also needless because Congress would easily pass a troop pay bill if Johnson were willing to gavel in. Long thread.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/10/national-security-presidential-memorandum-nspm-8/
8748762028