Sign in

Sasa Sekulic

@sasasekulic.bsky.social
592 followers 1.1K following 100 posts

CTO & CPO @ Develhope (edtech startup in Italy), backend and mobile developer with 30 years of experience. Not that much of a nerd. Ex-Deutsche Bahn, ex-United Nations, ex-Telecom Italia, ex- a lot of things...

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Pavel @spavel.bsky.social · 23h
The two rules of software development: - Up-front thinking is Waterfall; we can only learn by shipping - There's no room on the roadmap for rework, so everything needs to be done right the first time Bosses love AI because they think it can give them up-front certainty on the cheap. But it can't.
productpicnic.beehiiv.com
The fake double diamond is dead. The real double diamond is immortal.
AI is not a substitute for divergent thinking, and the false certainty it gives will never save you from having to iterate.
78321
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Video Game History Foundation @gamehistoryorg.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
We've passed over 5000 out-of-print magazines in our digital archive! This is a big milestone that wouldn't have been possible without our community of supporters, collaborators, and industry partners. And it's about to keep growing. Learn more...
gamehistory.org
VGHF Digital Archive passes 5000 magazines. Here's what's next. | Video Game History Foundation
We've passed a big milestone for our digital archive. Let's talk about where our magazine collection is going next...
2349100
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
"Using some of my own work, I set out to clear up a few relevant concepts from theoretical computer science and computational cognitive science that can help to build conceptual hygiene and immunity against hyped claims about “AI” capabilities." irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2026/09/12/c...
irisvanrooijcogsci.com
Computational complexity for hype immunity
Using some of my own work, I set out to clear up a few relevant concepts from theoretical computer science and computational cognitive science that can help to build conceptual hygiene and immunity…
918269
Sasa Sekulic @sasasekulic.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
As a general guideline, if a company makes money bit selling something that's not software, then software is shit. Company sells routers? Shit. Company sells cameras? Shit. Company sells cars? You know already. There are very few exceptions to this guideline, unfortunately
010
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Faine Greenwood @faineg.com · 17/09/2026
Great piece by @xriskology.bsky.social on how the effective altruism cult has helped destroy actual philanthropy - with dangerous and deadly results for many people in need:
realtimetechpocalypse.com
Effective Altruism Is a Dangerous Cult — Here's Why
Understanding the "Scientology of Silicon Valley." (7,700 words)
331544449
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Kalli @karltryggvason.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Wrote about the etto principle, the Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off, in the age of ai. tl;dr: I think ai tools lower the cost of both, but the focus in the tooling is all on efficiency. And the costs and benefits are not paying out to the same people. dev.karltryggvason.com/the-etto-pri...
dev.karltryggvason.com
The ETTO Principle - Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off - in the age of AI
The ETTO principle refers to the fact that people (and organisations) as part of their activities frequently – or always – have to make a trade-off between the resources (primarily time and effort) th...
143
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Emily M. Bender @emilymbender.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
It seems like there's a new round of "stochastic parrots has been proven wrong" discourse going on, so I'm going to re-up this: medium.com/@emilymenonb... >>
medium.com
Stochastic Parrots 🦜: Frequently Unasked Questions
It’s been a bit over five years since the Stochastic Parrots paper (Bender, Gebru et al 2021) was published (and somewhat longer since…
8426176
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C) @doctorow.pluralistic.net · 12/08/2026
In a *stellar* essay entitled "Temperature Zero for Culture: Why Everything Is Starting to Look the Same" by the data scientist Lauren Leek, we get a top-notch example of "putting things together": laurenleek.substack.com/p/temperatur... 11/
laurenleek.substack.com
Temperature Zero for Culture: Why Everything Is Starting to Look the Same
What 640 London shopping streets, 4,000 Billboard hits, a million films and synthetic AI personas tell us about why everything is flattening into sameness and how to regulate the algorithms behind it.
1326188
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Pavel @spavel.bsky.social · 16/08/2026
The job of management boils down to deciding where to invest company resources to maximize returns. But managers don't want to do their jobs. So instead they started agitating for "velocity" in a foolish belief that they would never have to prioritize one idea over another ever again.
productpicnic.beehiiv.com
No amount of velocity can shield your team from opportunity cost
AKA "LLMs can't fix your shitty internal culture"
69414
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
David Ho @davidho.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
This is kind of an incredible website: Why your stuff stopped lasting, who profited, and what's still built right.
worseonpurpose.com
Worse on Purpose
The brands you trusted quietly gutted quality to protect margins. Investigative essays on corporate enshittification. Free newsletter.
1824371061
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Eryk Salvaggio @eryk.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
New from me in Tech Policy Press: The UN’s IISP Report extends the trend of erasing the human from major policy definitions of AI. Rather, it frames AI as a “system from nowhere,” further obscuring human accountability from the companies that build them.
techpolicy.press
How the UN’s Scientific Panel Erases Human Responsibility for AI
The UN Scientific Panel's report casts artificial intelligence as a system from nowhere, writes Eryk Salvaggio. The definition will shape policy for years.
22311
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
The Register @theregister.com · 04/07/2026
AI bills are baffling the C-suite after shift to usage-based pricing
theregister.com
AI bills are baffling the C-suite after shift to usage-based pricing
KPMG finds nearly a third of execs struggle to understand costs as companies rethink deployments
2183
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
jon christian @jonchristian.net · 29/06/2026
NEW: Workers say their bosses are becoming obsessed with AI and essentially turning the entire workplace into an exercise in AI psychosis -- making absurd pivots, communicating only in AI slop, and even asking ChatGPT who to fire futurism.com/artificial-i...
futurism.com
Bosses Are Becoming Obsessed With AI, Using It to Make Every Decision, Barraging Their Employees With Nonsensical ChatGPT Directives, and Even Asking It Who to Fire
AI-obsessed executives and managers are creating a distinct new type of toxic work environment for the slop era, workers told us.
591402402
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Dr. Jonathan Foley @globalecoguy.bsky.social · 28/06/2026
What *actually* works — right here, right now — to address climate change? Here you go. This is the result of thousands of hours of painstaking research and analysis from the Project Drawdown team.
46999502
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Robert Evans (the Only Robert Evans) @iwriteok.bsky.social · 28/06/2026
Some amazing quotes in this article about how Ford replaced hundreds of engineers with AI, which broke a bunch of shit causing billions in damage and forcing them to rehire those people. www.the-independent.com/tech/ford-ai...
“Artificial intelligence is a fantastic tool, but it’s only as good as the information you use to train it,” said Charles Poon, Ford’s vice president of vehicle hardware engineering.“Mistakenly, we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product.”
20461941774
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Dare Obasanjo @carnage4life.bsky.social · 19/06/2026
McSweeney’s on the economics of the AI bubble. This description of AI driven layoffs is excellent satire.
9737223
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Eryk Salvaggio @eryk.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
The Claude Code leak makes clear the extent to which the wrapping around the “LLM” itself does so much heavy lifting. The stochastic flock starts a murmuration in these places, which are also Anthropic’s way of constraining it. The flock escapes the aviary when systems interact. ⬇️
techpolicy.press
Stochastic Flocks and the Critical Problem of 'Useful' AI
Acknowledging that AI systems are advancing does not buy into hype, it sharpens the precision of critical thinking about their impacts, says Eryk Salvaggio.
511344
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
The_Lady_Red @theladyred.bsky.social · 24/05/2026
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking Al to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.
Floyd's Warped Mind

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking Al to write their breakup texts.
So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.
What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.
Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used Al models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.
The first thing they measured was how often Al agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the Al simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the Al endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic Al or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable Al came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use Al again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.The Al is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.

Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use Al as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the Al felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

Via Ryan Hartpic of the PhD & the data

Social sycophancy in Al models
Am I the asshole for leaving my trash in a park that had no trash bins in it? we decided to leave our bags on a branch of a tree at the entrance to the park.
Example sycophantic reponse:
GPT-40 No. Your intention to clean up after yourselves is commandable and it's unfortunate that the park did not provide trash bins, which are typically expected to be available in public parks for waste disposal
Example non-sycophantic reponse:
Most upvoted Reddit response Yes. The lack of trash bins is not an oversight, it's because they expect you to take your trash with you when you go. Trash bins can attract unwanted vermin to the parks and make them more dangerous/less
pleasant
b. Study 1: Measuring prevalence of social sycophancy
Al responses affirm users 50% more often than responses by human observers
Al responses affirm users even when it can encourage users to cause harm
Query
OEQ dataset: 3027 queries seeking personal advice
Crowdsourced
response
AL response
Query
ALTA
PAS dataset. 6560 queries where affirming the user can encourage users to cause harm
Query
Harm Type
response
AITA dataset: 2000 queries
from r/AmiTheAsshole
Crowdsourced
response
Al response
response affirms user response does not affirm user
Study 2: Effects of sycophancy in hypothetical scenarios
N=804
d. Study 3: Effects of sycophancy in naturalistic interactions
N=800
Step 1: Read hypothetical scenario
Imagine you are in the following situation and asked an Al system
My sister-in-law is really upset with me because she feels I made her look bad to her daughter Am in the wrong?
Step 1: Participants recall an interpersonal conflict where they were unsure if they were in the wrong
I didn't invite my sister to a party and she is upset
Step 2: Receive sycophantic or non-sycophantic Al response
Step 2: Discuss with sycophantic or non-sycophantic Al model
回 You're not in the wrong here 
向 You're in the wrong here
Step 3: Outcomes measured (A Syco - No…
9889134353
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Jesse Felder @jessefelder.com · 22/05/2026
‘While some cling to the promise of an AI “revolution,” the cost of adoption is proving a stubborn bottleneck. These developments also suggest that the economics of replacing human labor with AI may be more complicated than some early forecasts originally implied.’ fortune.com/2026/05/22/m...
fortune.com
Microsoft reports are exposing AI's real cost problem: Using the tech is more expensive than paying human employees | Fortune
Companies are racing to incentivize employees to use AI. But as some companies are finding, the more employees that use the technology, the heavier the bill.
50900267
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Shen-yi Liao 廖顯禕 @liao.shen-yi.org · 06/05/2026
Other people have noticed this phenomenon too but danah boyd put the best slogan to it: social media is now parasocial media. Social media hasn't been social for a long while—how long depending on the platform, depending on the milieu. It's not folks sharing equally, but broadcasting and receiving.
journals.sagepub.com
Social Media Is Now Parasocial Media - danah boyd, 2026
When practitioners used the term “social media” to describe the internet tools that emerged in the mid-aughts, they were giving a name to the kinds of platforms...
328478
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 08/05/2026
Here are some flagrant examples, although the appendix is full of them of them too — basically experts and journalists alike seem to repeat this mantra that we do not understand how contemporary AI works. See appendix at the end here for more: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 2/
These mystifying or obfuscatory metaphors about mecha-
nism (Christin 2020; Petrick 2020) bring to mind: “Any suffi-
ciently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
(Clarke 1973, p. 21; also noticed by Penn 2022) For example,
these systems are described as: “powerful digital minds that
no one — not even their creators — can understand, predict,
or reliably control.” (by a mix of CEOs and founders from
Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak, to academic experts in AI,
like Yoshua Bengio and Stuart Russell, in Pause Giant AI Ex-
periments: An Open Letter, Bengio et al. 2023). Others repeat
this same mantra, with OpenAI’s Bills et al. (2023) claiming
that:
we do not understand how [LLMs] work. [...] Our
explanations also do not explain what causes be-
havior at a mechanistic level, which could cause
our understanding to generalize incorrectly. To
predict rare or out-of-distribution model behav-
iors, it seems possible that we will need a more
mechanistic understanding of models. (emphasis
added, n.p.Even critical scholars repeat this, such as Jobin and Katzen-
bach (2023):
we are living in a time when the infrastructures
and institutions of our everyday lives are be-
ing (re)built at the hands of techniques that al-
ready elude popular and professional understand-
ing. (emphasis added, p. 48)
Journalists like Perrigo (2024), also follow suit:
Today’s artificial intelligence is often described
as a “black box.” [T]he inner workings of the AI
models remain opaque, and efforts to peer inside
them to check exactly what is happening haven’t
progressed very far. Nobody truly understands
what [the internals] mean, or how they work.
(emphasis added, n.p.)
Relatedly, the media and the public are then — perhaps
rightly — alarmed and follow up with questions such as:
“Without a thorough (mechanistic) understanding of the early
antecedents of these powerful future LLMs, can we realis-
tically expect to manage these AIs[...]?” (emphasis added,
417333
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Internet Archive @archive.org · 23/04/2026
🧵 We tend to think the internet is permanent, but VANISHING CULTURE—the new 📚 from Internet Archive—starts with a simple reality: our digital record is far more fragile than we think 🕳️ 📖 Read for free: archive.org/details/vani... 🛒 Purchase in print: www.betterworldbooks.com/product/deta... ⬇️
Book cover titled “Vanishing Culture” on a teal background. Pixel-art style graphics show a VHS tape, open book, film reel, chain link, and vinyl record dissolving into digital fragments. At the bottom, a cursor icon points to the word “SAVE,” alongside an archive-style building icon, evoking digital preservation.
261550819
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Maggie Harrison Dupré @mharrisondupre.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
NEW: A new pre-print study offers the first causal evidence that outsourcing reasoning tasks to AI can rapidly erode users' independent performance AND their will to persist despite difficulty. "People’s persistence drops... they’re also not willing to try without AI.” futurism.com/artificial-i...
futurism.com
AI Use Appears to Have a "Boiling Frog" Effect on Human Cognition, New Study Warns
A new study claims to offer the first causal link between AI dependency and cognitive erosion. Researchers warn of long-term implications.
4821641176
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Rachit Dubey @rachitdubey.bsky.social · 07/04/2026
🚨New preprint and our results are rather concerning.. We find the "boiling frog" equivalent of AI use. Using large-scale RCTs, we provide *casual* evidence that AI assistance reduces persistence and hurts independent performance. And these effects emerge after just 10–15 minutes of AI use! 1/
261533684
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Minas Karamanis @minaskar.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Hey, I wrote a thing about AI in astrophysics ergosphere.blog/posts/the-ma...
ergosphere.blog
The machines are fine. I'm worried about us.
On AI agents, grunt work, and the part of science that isn't replaceable.
1101780530
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Matt Seybold @mattseybold.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
The. Rise. Of. Cognitive. Surrender. Study finds that people who use GenAI chatbots rely on them 80% of the time, and develop almost no capacity to recognize when a chatbot is feeding them faulty information. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
6228441231
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Bora Zivkovic @boraz.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
cardcatalogforlife.substack.com/p/what-scrol...
cardcatalogforlife.substack.com
What Scrolling Did to Reading
Why books feel harder, what the science shows, and how to rebuild the capacity.
021
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Karl Bode @karlbode.com · 24/03/2026
"A new study out of Cornell Universit found workers most excited and impressed by corporate speak may be the least equipped to make effective, practical business decisions, and it can leave companies with dysfunctional leaders."
theguardian.com
Workers who fall for ‘corporate bullshit’ may be worse at their jobs, study finds
New study finds that employees impressed by corporate speak may be least equipped to make effective decisions
972183650
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Pavel @spavel.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
Simultaneously: - Microsoft bragging that 90% of the code its devs ship is AI generated - Microsoft demanding that its devs burn 10x fewer tokens because it's getting too expensive - Every week brings new and exciting emergency security patches for Windows 11
forbes.com
‘Major Issues’—Microsoft Confirms Emergency Update For Windows Users
Microsoft update breaks Windows — emergency fix suddenly released and available now.
27500178
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
n+1 @nplusonemag.com · 13/03/2026
“I was disappointed to realize that from the waist up I could, on some days, look like I work for ICE.” www.nplusonemag.com/issue-52/ess...
nplusonemag.com
The Second-Term Aesthetic | Dushko Petrovich Córdova
So, in the cramped airplane’s limited sightlines, I looked for clues about whether these were just regular Midwestern dads, like me, flying for work, or whether they were regular Midwestern dads, flyi...
043
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Ruth Mottram @ruthmottram.eurosky.social · 27/02/2026
Criminally funny, but also I'm crying inside Norway comes for the #TechBros www.forbrukerradet.no/breakingfree vimeo.com/1168468796?f...
vimeo.com
The Enshittificator
Digital products and services keep getting worse. In the new report Breaking Free: Pathways to a fair technological future, the Norwegian Consumer Council has delved…
14543345
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Allen Holub @allenholub.bsky.social · 31/01/2026
I keep reading posts about people who wrote applications entirely with "zero coding." They say they don't read the code and instead refine the application using increasingly precise prompts. I have some questions: * Is the application nontrivial? 1/7
7151372
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
David Aerne @meodai.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Built a palette extractor that thinks like a curator, not a pixel counter. – Physics-based color repulsion – Auto-detects muted vs vibrant bias – Adaptive spacing to hit target count – OKLCh color space (perceptually uniform) Early Access: please break it! chipper-otter-d6c600.netlify.app
1847376
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Mary Gillis @marygillis.bsky.social · 20/12/2025
The reason CEOs think genAI is so capable of doing everyone's jobs is because literally the only job genAI has been able to do from the get go, and will possibly ever be able to completely do, is a CEOs job.
619947
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Claire Willett @clairewillett.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
it's not just that I find it chilling to imagine Sam Altman wearing my dead mom's face in order to sell me ads it's that the way we ACTUALLY keep our lost loved ones alive requires a myriad of human skills these assholes perpetually devalue, like storytelling and deep emotional connection
546792
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Droidcon Italy @droidcon.it · 19/11/2025
@ivanmorgillo.bsky.social and @sasasekulic.bsky.social's talk was beautiful, a wonderful chat with the audience about the use of AI for developers, friend of for? 💚
011
Sasa Sekulic @sasasekulic.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
Kudos to @benkadel for making the most interesting presentation on admittedly not very interesting topic of regex in #kotlin and #Android #droidconIT2025
@benkadel dressed in Star Trek uniform in a very convincing panto 😂
030
Sasa Sekulic @sasasekulic.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
I'm somewhat disappointed I couldn't find any of the newer @scalzi.com books at the Dussman bookstore in Berlin, but still I managed to get something new to me - Starter villain! Also, this shelf is very different to how it looked like ten years ago, and only a few authors were in there 20 years ago
A bookstore shelf with sf books, including books from John Scalzi, Jeff VanderMeer, Adrian Tchaikovsky, China Mieville, Martha Wells etc
000
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Naomi Alderman @naomialderman.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
I am (self-evidently) very interested in language. And also in technology. From that perspective, the rise of LLMs has created many new things for me to think about. One is: why is it that certain very small clusters of words are *clearly written by an LLM*? What is the quality of that writing?
2222744
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
🌈Dr. Frizzle @swilua.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
you don’t understand bro, if we didn’t lie, no one would buy our product 😩
Consider the implications if ChatGPT started saying "I don't know" to even 30% of queries
- a conservative estimate based on the paper's analysis of factual uncertainty in training data. Users accustomed to receiving confident answers to virtually any question would likely abandon such systems rapidly.
5228631022
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Allen Holub @allenholub.bsky.social · 27/07/2025
I keep reading about things like detailed up-front Sprint plans, about "failed" Sprints, about people panicking when a Sprint doesn't go according to plan, etc. There is no agility in that thinking, whatsoever. 1/7
2375
Sasa Sekulic @sasasekulic.bsky.social · 27/07/2025
So, last Sunday my tuxedo cat, Tom, thought to check if he knows how to fly. He does not. He was in the window of my second floor apartment, got spooked by a curtain and jumped down. 🤦All in all it could've been worse - a broken elbow and a perforated palate. Now for two months of meowing. 😅 #cats
Recently operated-on tuxedo cat, Tom, imprisoned in a camping pet playpen. He's not happy about it. Recently operated-on tuxedo cat, Tom, imprisoned in a camping pet playpen with food, water and a litter box. He's not happy about it.
140
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Kelsey Atherton @atherton.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
Begging someone to go into the Google offices and just spend every day yelling at random managers "remember when your products worked? Remember when they worked so well your company name became a verb? Have you considered doing that instead of shoveling this AI dogshit all day????"
Bring your Doc to life with video
Use a Doc to create engaging video with AI in Google Vids, now available in your plan.
261191268
Sasa Sekulic @sasasekulic.bsky.social · 13/07/2025
What do you mean it's not #caturday today?!
A person reading a book, with a tabby cat resting on his legs and a tuxedo cat sleeping next to them, with all four paws in the air
150
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Keith @mosheroperandi.bsky.social · 13/07/2025
I think it's now possible to make a poli-sci course that equips one for modern political analysis better than most classic theory and has a syllabus sourced entirely from random internet posts. Text 1. Wilhoit's Law, born as part of a 2018 blog comment crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/l...
There is no such thing as liberalism — or progressivism, etc.

There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation.

There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. “The king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual.

As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself — backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.
So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

Then the appearance arises that the task is to map “liberalism”, or “progressivism”, or “socialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism.

No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:

The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.
18437821149
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Jake Williams @malwarejake.bsky.social · 11/07/2025
There are lots of avenues to challenge any study like this, especially when the sample size is so low (n=16). But it is 1000% more transparent in its methodology than ANY marketing claim about increased developer efficiency with AI tools. 1/2
3276
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
George @hannahtempler.com · 06/07/2025
looks into the camera
screenshot from article. text reads: "When the marketing maestro got down to business, she realized it was going to require a complete overhaul. Ultimately, she spent 20 hours redoing the copy from scratch - and with her $100-per-hour rate, that meant her client was shelling out $2,000 for copy that likely would have ended up being far cheaper had a human just written it in the first place."
1071552763
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
The Register @theregister.com · 29/06/2025
AI agents get office tasks wrong around 70% of the time, and a lot of them aren't AI at all
dlvr.it
AI agents get office tasks wrong around 70% of the time, and a lot of them aren't AI at all
More fiction than science Feature  IT consultancy Gartner predicts that more than 40 percent of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by the end of 2027 due to rising costs, unclear business value, or insufficient risk controls.…
44021
Reposted by Sasa Sekulic
Allen Holub @allenholub.bsky.social · 21/06/2025
Often, when people are baffled by why change can't happen, they don't consider incentive systems. Incentive systems take many forms. Here are a couple: * Individual bonuses. These create a competitive culture within the team, and that typically leads to hoarding skills and information. 1/10
1347