Reposted by gamer for socialism, now on bluesky
every relationship I've been in has absolutely affected my gameplay mechanics
gamer for socialism, now on bluesky
@paralleltrees.bsky.social
162 followers 779 following 112 posts
fleeing twitter for a better website (i’ll be on there until it totally closes lol). demsoc. destiny 2 enjoyer. she/her
![3. The thrust of Defendant’s argument is his assertion that “[t]he Eleventh
Circuit and district courts routinely authorize incarcerated depositions when proper
notice is given and the deposition is relevant to claims or defenses, notwithstanding
other discovery disputes.” Doc. 174 at ¶ 5. Defendant bolstered this assertion with
a lengthy string citation of legal authority and parentheticals that appeared to support
Defendant’s proposition. But the entire string citation appears to have been made
up out of whole cloth.
4. First, Defendant states that “United States v. Baker, 539 F. App’x 937,
943 (11th Cir 2013)” “confirm[s] broad discovery rights under Rules 26 and 30.”
Doc. 174 at ¶ 5. While United States v. Baker, 529 Fed. Appx. 987 (11th Cir. 2013)
is an actual case, it is an appeal challenging a criminal’s sentencing enhancement.
The case makes no mention of discovery, much less of Rule 26 or Rule 30. The
actual case found at 539 F. App’x 937 is styled Williams v. Morahan, and it likewise
does not discuss discovery. See Williams v. Morahan, 539 F. App’x 937 (11th Cir
2013). The pincite of page 943 in Defendant’s citation does not exist.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:purwgefqj4hh536crvjlxb7c/bafkreigorgy4vy66jnsubtq7thqecelb4yvix6mzc7u4atzc5xhubfkf3i)
