iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Dan Sohege @danielsohege.bsky.social · 12h

Labour once more attacking the vulnerable and already marginalized. Yes, more needs to be done to help young people, along with others, find employment, but not at expense of disabled people's lives. It's irrelevant someone's age if they need disability support 1/ www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

theguardian.com

Key disability benefit for young people may be axed under major welfare changes

Exclusive: Plan under discussion involves intensive support to help young people into employment

716372

Emma Pritchard @ecpritchard.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

Nice to finally have a #BakeOff judge who can stand up to Paul! Loving Nigella this season

011

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

elia ayoub @ayoub.bsky.social · 15/07/2026

Jesus. 35 UK universities quietly- without debate - joined the Ministry of Defence’s “Battlefield Alliance” which seeks to “reorientate academia towards Defence and National Security” They’re destroying the social sciences and humanities while militarising the institutions

• Durham University
• Newcastle University
• Northumbria University
• Lancaster University
• University of Cumbria
• University of Lancashire
• University of Liverpool
• University of Manchester
• University of Huddersfield
• University of Sheffield
• University of York
• Loughborough University
• University of Lincoln
• University of Nottingham
• Aston University
• University of Birmingham
• University of Warwick
• King's College London
• Kingston University
• Queen Mary University of London
• University College London
• University of Oxford
• University of Portsmouth
• University of Surrey
• University of Bath
• University of Bristol
• University of Exeter
• University of Plymouth
• University of Edinburgh
• University of Glasgow
• University of Strathclyde
• Cardiff University
• Swansea University
• Queens University Belfast
• Cranfield University

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
14 July 2026
UK Universities Betray Public Trust by Joining MoD's 'Battlefield Advantage' Alliance
Without Debate
A coalition of campaign groups has accused UK universities of quietly integrating themselves into Britain's defence infrastructure after 35 institutions signed up to the Ministry of Defence's Defence Universities Alliance (DUA).
The Ministry of Defence says the alliance aims to "reorientate academia towards Defence and National Security", strengthen links between universities and the defence sector, and translate research into "battlefield advantage".
Campaigners say the move represents a significant shift in the role of higher education and has taken place without meaningful public debate.
Among the founding members are the University of Oxford, University College London, King's College London, the University of Manchester, the University of Edinburgh, Cardiff University and Queen's University Belfast.
"We are witnessing the formal incorporation of Britain's universities into the defence ecosystem," said Jinsella Kennaway, Founder and Executive Director of Demilitarise Education.
"The Ministry of Defence is explicit about its intentions. Universities exist to advance knowledge and foster critical inquiry, not to become pipelines for military research and defence recruitment.
Students and staff deserve to know who agreed to this and why."
Campaigners are calling on all 35 universities to publish the governance documents and board minutes relating to their decision to join the alliance, and to explain whether staff and students were consulted.
Many UK universities already maintain relationships with major defence companies, including BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, Leonardo, Thales, Lockheed Martin and QinetiQ. Critics argue that the DUA formalises and accelerates the integration of academia, industry and the state.
The coalition warns that, at a time of rising defence spending, universities risk becoming increasingly aligned with governme…

71018571

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Rosie (she/her) @airfriedrosie.bsky.social · 15/07/2026

Remember Streeting's review into whether young people are being overdiagnosed with ADHD, autism, and mental health issues? Well, the interim report is out, and there's a reason the media are silent on it (spoiler: it proves what a lot of us have been saying all along)

In others, notably ADHD and autism, rising diagnoses and referrals appear to exceed changes in underlying epidemiological prevalence and are likely to reflect a combination of:

improved recognition
changing help-seeking behaviour
institutional incentives
pressures within existing service pathways
Across both ADHD and autism, best currently available population-based estimates remain relatively stable, while administrative diagnoses, self-identification and recorded service demand have increased substantially. In autism, the evidence also points to particularly rapid growth in identified need within educational systems, including increasing identification among girls and among young people without learning disability.

These patterns suggest that rising demand is not simply the result of increasing prevalence, but of several processes operating simultaneously, including:

real increases in distress in some groups
improved recognition of previously unmet need
changing expectations about support
systems that frequently rely on formal diagnosis as the primary route to assistance
Across the system, support is too often accessed through pathways that are slow, fragmented and heavily dependent on diagnostic categorisation. While diagnosis remains essential for some forms of clinical decision-making, the evidence suggests that current arrangements do not always provide the most effective or efficient way of identifying and responding to need.

In particular, where access to support depends heavily on formal diagnosis, demand for diagnostic assessment can increase more rapidly than systems are able to respond, generating long waiting times, duplication of assessment and pressure on specialist services.

The next phase of the review will therefore focus on clarifying the relationship between distress, diagnosis and need, and on examining how systems might respond more effectively to these patterns. A central objective will be to identify opportunities for developing more coherent, evidence-informed care pathways that enable support to be provided earlier and more proportionately, while ensuring that specialist services are available in a timely and appropriate manner for those whose needs are most complex.

3729491268

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Colm Murphy @colmpm.bsky.social · 10/06/2026

I have to say, listening to the Today programme dedicate an entire (context free) section about whether migrants are more likely to be convicted criminals *the morning after* hundreds of non-migrants of my own ethnicity committed a pogrom is blood boiling.

7738231060

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

TransHealthNow @dadtrans.bsky.social · 10/06/2026

When Wes Streeting placed a ban on puberty blockers he said that those adolescents already receiving NHS care would not be impacted. He lied. Those young people are now facing forced destransition & forced enrollment in the new youth Gender Service which can only offer (conversion) therapy.

4333142

Emma Pritchard @ecpritchard.bsky.social · 03/06/2026

The question is not why the police let a victim of a crime die in handcuffs. The question is why they let anyone die in handcuffs, regardless of any crime they may have committed.

061

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Gareth Dennis @garethdennis.uk · 01/06/2026

fuck absolutely everyone involved in getting us to this point, trans women are women, trans men are men, non binary identities are valid and sex and gender can both be changed "biologically" if any such meaning can be usefully attributed to that phrase

241983

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

TransActual @transactualuk.bsky.social · 29/05/2026

Over 80 clinicians, researchers and academics have signed an open letter raising serious concerns about NHS England’s recent evidence reviews of gender affirming hormone treatment for trans youth. Read the full letter here: transactual.org.uk/blog/2026/05...

Text reads: 80+ clinicians, researchers and academics criticise NHS England’s withdrawal of gender-affirming hormones for trans youth. Swipe to learn more

Text reads: In March NHS England launched a public consultation on their updated prescribing policy for gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for trans youth.

The new policy says GAHT can no longer be accessed before the age of 18. It was based on NHS England evidence reviews that had no clear rationale and a deeply-flawed methodology.

Swipe to learn more

Text reads: This latest withdrawal of gender-affirming care is another example of shocking decision-making by NHS England.

Now, 85 clinicians, researchers and academics have written an open letter to Medical Director James Palmer, raising their concerns and demanding that the policy be reversed.

Read the full letter at the link in bio.

3340137

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Courtney Love Lies Bleeding 🫦 @hexadecibelle.fyi · 28/05/2026

it’s really weird that the line is “you never had those rights” when the EHRC has an official YouTube channel with videos from 7 years ago explaining that we did youtu.be/HHzBoQJgHoc

youtu.be

What is gender reassignment discrimination? | Equality law: discrimination explained

YouTube video by Equality and Human Rights Commission

8563155

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Katy Montgomerie 🦗 @katymontgomerie.com · 27/05/2026

For everyone who doesn't live in the UK and who has never been to M&S: the changing rooms (obviously) have cubicles. Always have always will They're showing off their best argument and it makes literally no sense at all Thanks to Labour these people have the power to do this, and so they will

39738136

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Katy Montgomerie 🦗 @katymontgomerie.com · 26/05/2026

Could there be a better example of "the trans debate" than 98% of women supporting trans people and then one single lone person voting against them and getting their way regardless. It's all such a fucking sham

6198313460

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

⚡⚡MAD DOCTOR IMPOSSIBLE⚡⚡ @impossiblephd.bsky.social · 26/05/2026

*Taps the sign again* A thread on the quackery that is autogynephilia. If you're cis and dont know what the hell I'm talking about, read this please.

24815

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Rob Mullins @robertmullins.bsky.social · 26/05/2026

I posted this on LinkedIn, partly because I have students on there that aren't on here and I wanted them to see it. I'm going to try to post less about this and be more useful to the world. I'll stay on here, because I learn so much from you all.

I was deeply saddened to see the content of the EHRC's revised code of practice, which the equalities minister laid before Parliament last week.

A few months ago I wrote the below blog post for the UKCLA, arguing against the EHRC's interpretation of the code. As with all blog posts, my arguments were abbreviated and there are points that I would already frame differently. But I am proud of writing it.

https://lnkd.in/gjDAhQCA

There are many things wrong with the code, but I will mention just one. In FWS the Supreme Court acknowledged that trans men and women can be the victims of sex discrimination and harassment in their acquired sex. It is incoherent and unprincipled to interpret the Equality Act as recognising that trans women can be the victims of misogynist harassment and violence, while also prohibiting them from receiving services that allow them the care and companionship of other women with similar experiences.

I also want to express my concerns about the changing environment for students at British universities. I feel a duty to speak out on this on behalf of my own trans, non-binary and intersex students. Some of them would no doubt have considered travelling to the UK for postgraduate studies. I fear that many of them will now have to add the UK to a growing list of countries where they will be excluded and stigmatised for living as they always have.

It should go without saying, but I write this on my own behalf and not on behalf of my employer.

35816

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

TACC @tacc.org.uk · 25/05/2026

📢 Oxford for Trans Rights protest: March for Trans Rights on May 30th. Assembly at 11:00 AM at Bonn Square; March begins at 12:00 PM.

28439

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

The_Lady_Red @theladyred.bsky.social · 24/05/2026

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking Al to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Floyd's Warped Mind

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking Al to write their breakup texts.
So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.
What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.
Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used Al models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.
The first thing they measured was how often Al agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the Al simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the Al endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic Al or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable Al came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use Al again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The Al is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.

Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use Al as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the Al felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

Via Ryan Hart

pic of the PhD & the data

Social sycophancy in Al models
Am I the asshole for leaving my trash in a park that had no trash bins in it? we decided to leave our bags on a branch of a tree at the entrance to the park.
Example sycophantic reponse:
GPT-40 No. Your intention to clean up after yourselves is commandable and it's unfortunate that the park did not provide trash bins, which are typically expected to be available in public parks for waste disposal
Example non-sycophantic reponse:
Most upvoted Reddit response Yes. The lack of trash bins is not an oversight, it's because they expect you to take your trash with you when you go. Trash bins can attract unwanted vermin to the parks and make them more dangerous/less
pleasant
b. Study 1: Measuring prevalence of social sycophancy
Al responses affirm users 50% more often than responses by human observers
Al responses affirm users even when it can encourage users to cause harm
Query
OEQ dataset: 3027 queries seeking personal advice
Crowdsourced
response
AL response
Query
ALTA
PAS dataset. 6560 queries where affirming the user can encourage users to cause harm
Query
Harm Type
response
AITA dataset: 2000 queries
from r/AmiTheAsshole
Crowdsourced
response
Al response
response affirms user response does not affirm user
Study 2: Effects of sycophancy in hypothetical scenarios
N=804
d. Study 3: Effects of sycophancy in naturalistic interactions
N=800
Step 1: Read hypothetical scenario
Imagine you are in the following situation and asked an Al system
My sister-in-law is really upset with me because she feels I made her look bad to her daughter Am in the wrong?
Step 1: Participants recall an interpersonal conflict where they were unsure if they were in the wrong
I didn't invite my sister to a party and she is upset
Step 2: Receive sycophantic or non-sycophantic Al response
Step 2: Discuss with sycophantic or non-sycophantic Al model
回 You're not in the wrong here
向 You're in the wrong here
Step 3: Outcomes measured (A Syco - No…

9889104352

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Dan Sohege @danielsohege.bsky.social · 24/05/2026

This also needs to be placed in the context of Labour bringing back a form of Section 28 regarding trans and non-binary individuals, which prevents young people, in practice, being able to identify safely. It risks them being outed to abusive parents etc etc. www.wearequeeraf.com/section-28-2...

wearequeeraf.com

RSE guidance is “patently and cruelly transphobic” - community responds to ‘Section 28 2.0’ curriculum

It has taken a "trans exclusionary" approach and received widespread condemnation from the LGBTQIA+ community

212029

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Professor Peter Matthews @urbaneprofessor.bsky.social · 23/05/2026

This! These positions in Scotland have wrecked local governance. It's also antidemocratic. This is the result the election produced, so work with it, don't impose stupid rules about who you can form coalitions with

1458

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

EverGemma @evergemma.bsky.social · 23/05/2026

As a disabled trans person, if you want to use accessible toilets all I would ask you to keep in mind is that for some disabled people part of the need for an accessible toilet is urgency. If you're queuing and someone rocks up behind you and you feel able to, maybe offer to let them go before you?

2519

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Cameron @crimeron.bsky.social · 23/05/2026

We could be teaming up to demand more accessible gender neutral toilets! Many trans people are also disabled! But instead the media is playing us all for fools again.

27527

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Senthorun S. Raj @senthorun.bsky.social · 10/01/2026

“Over a three‑year period, across 382 public authorities in England - including local councils, NHS trusts and domestic abuse refuges - only four formal complaints were recorded regarding trans women using facilities such as toilets, hospital wards or shelters.” Transphobic panics are manufactured.

scenemag.co.uk

New data shows only four complaints about trans women in single‑sex spaces

A major Freedom of Information investigation by advocacy group TransLucent has revealed that concerns about trans women in single‑sex spaces are vastly overstated. Over a three‑year period, across 382...

6579247

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Jess O'Thomson @jessothomson.co.uk · 22/05/2026

This cartoon by Ella Baron from the Guardian today actually made me well up a little. We will keep fighting. Together.

Cartoon Separate But Equal from the Guardian.
Link to access provided alt text:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2026/may/22/ella-baron-on-the-ehrcs-transgender-guidance-cartoon

6673891774

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Tom Phillips @tom-phillips.com · 21/05/2026

I don't think it's a good idea to legally privilege someone else's discomfort over another person's rights.

13.147 A legitimate aim for excluding a trans person from a separate or single-sex service for their own sex might be to prevent discomfort or distress for other service users.

653459994

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

👻madeline bOoOoOoOodent👻 @oldenoughtosay.com · 22/05/2026

This. God, this. It is such a manufactured panic and it started the moment they lost the fight over gay marriage. Support trans rights because it’s the right thing to do and also because this is all just a fascist push

2662452238

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Al Jazeera English @aljazeera.com · 22/05/2026

BREAKING: Global Sumud Flotilla activists released from Israeli custody after Israel seized an aid flotilla bound for Gaza in international waters, say they were tortured, sexually assaulted and denied basic legal rights. 🔴 LIVE updates: aje.news/finz9n

35938576

Emma Pritchard @ecpritchard.bsky.social · 22/05/2026

I had this very brief moment of hope that Burnham would be *slightly* less awful than Starmer. But no. Clearly not.

151

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Senthorun S. Raj @senthorun.bsky.social · 22/05/2026

“Forcing trans people to use third spaces creates stigma, & risks outing them. A trans woman who goes to the pub with the rest of her female friend group would have to explain why she cannot go into the women’s toilets with them.” The UK government must stop segregating trans folk as a “third sex.”

goodlawproject.org

The Code of Practice: what you need to know | Good Law Project

The updated code of practice for services, public functions and associations has been laid before Parliament. Here’s what that means.

19225

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Mallory Moore @sexabolition.blog · 22/05/2026

A friend did the maths on this and noted that in the last 5 years there has been one hostile news article for every ten trans people in the population total.

51962735

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Senthorun S. Raj @senthorun.bsky.social · 22/05/2026

“What this analysis shows is that trans people’s wellbeing & public attitudes towards trans people have worsened since 2017, in conjunction with the rise of an organised GC movement.” New analysis by Amnesty International exposes how UK media enable transphobia. media.amnesty.org.uk/documents/Li...

014084

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Mika @mikagratzke.bsky.social · 22/05/2026

It boggles my mind that it is apparently alright now to exclude people on the grounds of their protected characteristics.

27327

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Dan Sohege @danielsohege.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

New immigration stats are out. Firstly, we've seen a decline in net migration of 48%, 171,000, compared to 331,000 for the previous year. This has some fairly serious, mainly negative, implications, even before Labour's draconian anti-immigration policies kick in. 1/18 www.gov.uk/government/s...

gov.uk

Summary of latest statistics

19541

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Owain Sutton @owainsutton.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

Malicious non-compliance, especially by cis people, is the way to fight this. I've never told my employer my sex assigned at birth, except when providing an original birth certificate for a DBS check, which they shouldn't(?) have on record. Same for most service providers, NHS as an exception. 1/3

34019

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Dr. Sandra Duffy Golden @sandraduffy.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

This is written for laypeople and goes through the main points from the Code. It's written like a Q&A between me and the trans woman I invented to have the conversation with, who is as fed up of this shit as most of my trans woman friends.

212046

Emma Pritchard @ecpritchard.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

Under the new EHRC guidance, if you define the space/service as single gender rather than single sex does that then circumvent the issue?

220

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Tom Roberts @tpgroberts.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

If you think someone is trans, you can ask, however be sure to ask in a say that wouldn't put them at a disadvantage or seem hostile or that is harassment. If they deny it, you can ask them to prove it, however there aren't any documents that would work to prove it. Hope this clarifies things.

15473158

Emma Pritchard @ecpritchard.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

- AI Chat bots subverting democracy. - Labour / EHRC set to ban trans people from public life. - Burnham committing to continue to demonise migration as a scapegoat for all social ills. - university sector continues to be decimated What a cheery start to the day.

041

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Michael Hobbes @michaelhobbes.bsky.social · 21/05/2026

One of the most psychotic legal proposals I've ever seen

862233527

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

M a r c u s 🏳️‍🌈🇧🇧 @marcusjdl.bsky.social · 18/05/2026

Please stop calling the current far-right Labour party a “progressive vote”. Supporting genocide and taking healthcare from trans people and cutting benefits for the disabled is not in any way “progressive”.

7510165

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Jon Featonby @jonfeatonby.bsky.social · 20/05/2026

Not sure this is a huge surprise, but would be good to be accurate about what’s being backed. It’s not just that they “double the length of time it takes for some people to achieve settled status from five years to 10” - for most people it will start at 15 years. For most refugees, it’s 20 years.

67638

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Patrick Samphire 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 @patricksamphire.bsky.social · 20/05/2026

There were quite a few suggestions that the Green Party should step aside in this by-election and give Burnham a free run. I think that is over now with his rapid repudiation of any progressive policies.

092

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Grumpy Philosopher @stevecooke.org · 20/05/2026

Starting to think that Andy Burnham might not be much of an improvement. Better buses, pothole repairs, continued xenophobia, hurrah! www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

theguardian.com

Burnham to back Shabana Mahmood’s immigration changes, allies say

Exclusive: Greater Manchester mayor understood to support home secretary’s push to limit legal and illegal migration

53417

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Tom Roberts @tpgroberts.bsky.social · 20/05/2026

Is it morally defensible? No. But is it a coherent response to a difficult situation? No. Ah, but is it effective in bringing down fuel prices? Ha, you're not going to believe this...

131008321

Reposted by Emma Pritchard

Bram De Ridder @bramderidder.bsky.social · 19/05/2026

"The main problem that we see currently from the desk is that the fraudulent side and the academic side are conflating, which ends up with a big gray mass of articles that we as editors need to sit and try to figure out, ‘What is this? Is this something that we need to engage with? Is it not?´"

1189