iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by TACC

Robin Hayward 🌳 🏳️‍⚧️ @canopyrobin.com · 6h

One of the biggest obstacles to trans inclusivity in fieldwork is uncertainty. Here's a video of me talking about it but you can also read about it at inclusivefieldwork.leeds.ac.uk

02918

TACC @tacc.org.uk · 48m

The Supreme Court has responded to the complaint we have raised alongside @translucent.org.uk and @transparentaction.bsky.social and, as expected, they have failed to address the concerns we have raised...

"Dear Trans Advocacy & Complaints Collective, Transparent Action, and
TransLucent
Thank you for your complaint about the Court's new exhibition. I understand
your concern to be that the presentation of For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish
Ministers appears to be weighted towards the perspective of those who
campaigned for and celebrated the outcome, while giving insufficient
recognition to those who opposed it. You have confirmed that you are not
challenging the judgment itself or the inclusion of the case in the exhibition.
As Head of External Affairs and Communications, with responsibility for the
exhibition, I have been asked to respond to the matters you have raised. It may
be helpful first to explain the exhibition's purpose and approach.
The Law and Us features 70 appeals heard by the Supreme Court, the Judicial
Committee of the Privy Council and the Appellate Committee of the House of
Lords, the predecessor to the Supreme Court. The cases cover a wide range of
legal issues and were selected to illustrate both the breadth of the Court's work
and the ways in which the law affects people's lives. The exhibition also explains
the creation of the Court, the development of law in the UK and the role of the
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers is one of the 70 featured appeals.
As with the other case studies, it explains the background to the dispute, the"

"legal questions considered, the Justices' decision and a subsequent reflection
from a Justice or another person connected with the law. Images relating to the
appeal or its wider context were selected to help visitors understand the issues.
...You suggest that the headline, "When the law says 'woman', what does it mean?"
could imply that the Court went further than the judgment itself. The headline
refers expressly to the meaning of terms used in law. The question before the
Court concerned the meaning of "woman" and "sex" in a specific piece of
legislation. This is made clear in the case study under the paragraph heading
"The heart of the case". The display does not suggest that the Court provided a
general definition outside of the legislation it was considering.
Regarding your concerns about the images used - which you say "reflects the
perspective of those who celebrated the judgment" while largely ignoring those who
did not - the display features an image of the Scottish Government alongside that
of For Women Scotland, thus representing both parties in the appeal. This is
consistent with the approach taken across the exhibition. Their purpose is to
illustrate the case and its context, rather than to represent every individual or
organisation with an interest in the wider debate. The inclusion of any image
does not signify the Court's endorsement of any person or organisation
depicted. We did not visually represent the interveners; however, details of them
as well as the judgment, are available on the Court's website, along with the
recordings of the hearing and written_legalarguments.
Lady Rose's contribution is a personal reflection on the atmosphere in
Courtroom 1 when the judgment was handed down. It does not endorse a
particular position or present the outcome as a cause for celebration. The
exhibition also states that, when handing down the judgment, the Court
emphasised that trans people remain protected from discrimination under the
Equality Act 2010.."

"private room, and seats were not allocated according to the position an
individual supported in either case.
I have carefully considered the matters you have raised, examining the wording,
images, personal reflection and contextual material in the exhibition. I am
satisfied that the display accurately explains the issue before the Court, the
judgment and its legal context, and is consistent with the approach taken across
the exhibition. I am also satisfied that the arrangements for members of the
public who attended the judgment hand-down were professional, impartial and
transparent.
If you are dissatisfied with the handling or outcome of your complaint, you may
request a review within 14 days in accordance with the Administrative
Complaints Policy, details of which are available on the Court's website.
Yours sincerely
Bom Mema
Mr John McManus
Head of External Affairs & Communications
"

43614

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 23h

I have written to @bphillipsonmp.bsky.social to ask some important questions relating to her appearance and comments on The Daily T's Sunday Showdown, where she stated she was "a woman, defined by my biology", and that a women’s refuge should be for those of us who are “biologically women"

"... When asked whether you would have allowed a trans woman fleeing domestic abuse into the women’s refuge you once managed, you answered: “No.”

You said that alternative provision could be made, and that a women’s refuge should be for those of us who are “biologically women”.

That deserves considerably more scrutiny than another political soundbite.

You have chosen to justify your position by appealing to biology, so I would like you to explain what you mean by that claim in biological terms, rather than simply referring back to the law, the Supreme Court or the EHRC.

What, biologically, is a woman?

The scientific picture is considerably more complicated than the neat binary your statement suggests. Sex-related biology involves multiple characteristics, including chromosomes, gonads, reproductive anatomy, hormones and secondary sex characteristics. These characteristics do not always align in the stereotypical way, which is why medicine recognises differences of sex development. Contemporary scientific literature describes sex-related biology as involving multiple interacting characteristics rather than one single biological test that can infallibly sort every human being into one of two boxes.

You already know this. Biologists, doctors and other experts sent you an open letter specifically explaining these issues. They warned that reducing human sex biology to an immutable binary is an oversimplification and that policy built upon that oversimplification can cause real harm.

That does not mean biological sex is meaningless. It obviously is not. Female and male reproductive biology are real and medically important. But acknowledging that doesn't require pretending every human body is a perfectly standard biological specimen.

So let us get away from slogans.

You say that you are a woman “defined by my biology”. You say that I am not.

What, precisely, is the biological distinction you are making?"

"...And how would you establish it?

Would you take my blood? Sequence my chromosomes? Examine my gonads? Inspect my anatomy? Measure my hormones? Demand medical records?

Because the moment “biologically a woman” has to become a real-world test rather than a political phrase, the simplicity disappears.

And nowhere is that more obvious than in the refuge you once managed.

Imagine a woman arriving at the door after fleeing an abusive partner. She is terrified. She has no passport, no birth certificate and no medical records. She may have left everything behind to get herself and her children somewhere safe.

You have said the refuge should be for women who are “biologically women”.

So how does the refuge establish that?

Does she need to prove her chromosomes before being allowed through the door? Does somebody examine her body? Does she have to produce evidence of her reproductive anatomy? Or does a member of staff simply look at her and decide whether she appears sufficiently female?

Because the last option is not biology.

It is gender policing.

And then comes the question you cannot escape: how would you identify a trans woman without simply assuming that she is trans?

You cannot see somebody's chromosomes. You cannot see their gonads. You cannot see their hormone levels. You cannot see their developmental history.

If your answer is appearance, you have created a system in which women can be challenged because they are too masculine, too tall, too muscular, too deep-voiced, too gender-nonconforming or do not conform to somebody else's idea of what a woman is supposed to look like.

That is not a minor administrative problem. It is the policing of women's bodies, dressed up as biological certainty.

And feminism should recognise that for what it is...."

"...Sex and gender are related, but they're not interchangeable concepts. Sex encompasses biological characteristics and processes; gender also encompasses the social and personal dimensions through which human beings understand and live their gender. The scientific literature itself recognises that these concepts interact in complex ways rather than functioning as two completely separate boxes.
...You have experience running a women's refuge. You know what a woman arriving at that door needs. She does not need a politician's abstract definition of womanhood. She needs safety.

So I am asking you, as Minister for Women and Equalities, to answer some very straightforward questions.

What biological characteristics make you a woman and make me not one?

How would you establish that distinction in practice?

How does your definition account for women with differences of sex development?

What happens to women whose chromosomes do not fit the stereotypical XX model?

What happens to women who cannot produce eggs, who have no ovaries, who have undergone hysterectomy or who have otherwise experienced changes to their reproductive anatomy?

And most importantly:

How does a frightened woman fleeing domestic abuse prove that she is “biologically a woman” without being subjected to exactly the kind of bodily scrutiny and gender policing that feminists have spent generations challenging?

If your answer is that she does not have to prove it, then why should a trans woman?

If your answer is documentation, what happens to the woman who has none?

If your answer is appearance, whose idea of female appearance are you using?

And if there is no practical biological test, then perhaps “biology” is not quite the straightforward answer you have presented it as.

Women fleeing violence need refuge workers asking whether they are safe, not whether they can pass an ideological biology exam....."

"...You have chosen to draw a line between yourself and me by saying that you are a woman defined by biology and that women like me are not. I am therefore asking you to explain where that line actually is.

Not in a court judgment.

Not in an EHRC document.

Not in a political slogan.

In biology.

Because if you cannot define the biological test, and cannot explain how it could be applied fairly to women standing at the door of a refuge, then “biologically a woman” is not the clear, objective safeguard you claim it is.

It is simply a phrase being used to decide which women are allowed through the door.

And when the woman on the other side of that door is fleeing an abuser, that is not an abstract debate.

That is somebody's life.

Yours sincerely,

A woman who apparently needs a biology exam to prove it,'

56719

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 29/09/2026

So sex is "boringly simple, straightforward and immutable", you say, Maya... I think you will find it is none of these things unless you ignore the scientific consensus...

"
Maya Forstater
@MForstater
·
34m
How about this- people can say whatever they like about their gender and change it as many times a day as they like, with as many options as they like, without any state involvement or constraints.

Meanwhile their sex - which is what laws, rules and rights relate to remains boringly simple, straightforward and immutable."

6496

Reposted by TACC

Robin Hayward 🌳 🏳️‍⚧️ @canopyrobin.com · 25/09/2026

Things are really tough as a trans person right now and guidelines and policies often fall short of meaningful support. I am so proud to have created these resources and I hope that they will help a lot of people. Guidelines actually written by trans people are so important!

1776

Reposted by TACC

Philippa East (Author) @philippaeast.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

Calling any and all clinicians, researchers, and academics working in gender care, paediatrics, or related fields of healthcare, medicine & science! I have an important campaign you may be able to help with, regarding 🏳️‍⚧️ healthcare 🙏🙏🙏 If you’re interested let me know & I will DM you full details

05738

Reposted by TACC

Robin Moira White @robinmoirawhite.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

The Labour Party’s women’s conference on 26/9/26 was an embarrassing farce, with only 200 delegates of the 1,000 normal attendance (no major unions) in protest of the Labour Party’s shameful abandonment of trans people following the legally absurd ruling of the Supreme Court in FWS in April 2025.

121264280

Reposted by TACC

TransLucent @translucent.org.uk · 24/09/2026

BREAKING: "The Directors of TransLucent are pleased to confirm that we have applied to the High Court to intervene in the Hampstead Heath Ponds case – one that could prove pivotal for trans people in the future...... translucent.org.uk/translucent-...

translucent.org.uk

TransLucent Applies to the High Court to Intervene in the Hampstead Heath Ponds Case.

23311

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 26/09/2026

Wonder if they are aware of the £38,555 of funding she has received... not for her case but so "she can treat herself to something she loves."

"In support of Sandie Peggie
Mansfield, England, United Kingdom
In support of Sandie Peggie
£38,555
Successful
2,288 supporters
Share
Need to raise money?

Get started with Crowdfunder
Paula Hill

About the project owner
Aim
Let’s show Sandie some love and support, and imagine that when this is all over, she can treat herself to something she loves."

810119

Reposted by TACC

Lyra 💕 @lyra-scotland.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

Yet another article that mentions us without us. Trans people boycotting labour's conference is mentioned here. It calls it a protest by "Trans Activists" and ignore that the majority of the companies biggest unions are boycotting & then pushes labour as too soft on trans people. archive.is/2JGrC

archive.is

1192

TACC @tacc.org.uk · 25/09/2026

We have heard today from one of our members in Glasgow that Category is Book in Govanhill has been attacked again for the second time in a fortnight. The main shop window has been smashed again. www.gofundme.com/f/categoryis...

gofundme.com

Donate to Help Category Is Books Get Shutters!, organized by Category Is Books

For the past eight years, Category Is Books has been able to comfortably oper… Category Is Books needs your support for Help Category Is Books Get Shutters!

06026

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 25/09/2026

Sex Matters' claim that the Sex by Deception guidance by the CPS is not transphobic enough has been dismissed: Sex Matters v Director of Public Prosecutions www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u... DPP agreed before the case to make some changes to the guidance, which we will need to see how it's changed

"The outcome
156. For the reasons we have explained at paras 123-134 above, we do not accept that a
suspect’s deception as to their gender identity is incapable of vitiating consent to sexual
activity for the purposes of section 74 SOA whatever the circumstances. In order to
avoid any misunderstanding, we emphasise that our decision goes no further than that.
We do not conclude that a deception as to gender identity will negate a complainant’s
consent to sexual activity; whether or not a particular deception has that effect will fall
for consideration on the basis of the circumstances and evidence in the case in question.
However, on the current state of the law we cannot conclude in advance of such cases
arising that a deception as to gender identity could never negate a complainant’s consent
and it would be unwise and inappropriate for us to do so.
157. It follows that we have rejected the claimant’s Ground 1. The DPP’s Deception
Guidance does not wrongly state the law in this regard (paras 135-142 above).
158. We have also rejected the claimant’s Ground 2, as the DPP’s guidance does not present
a misleading picture of the true legal position, as we have explained at paras 145-153
above.
159. Accordingly, we will dismiss the claim"

3426

Reposted by TACC

Robin Hayward 🌳 🏳️‍⚧️ @canopyrobin.com · 25/09/2026

We're publishing new guidance to support trans people who do fieldwork (any work outside the office)! Now we need your help to get them seen so please share! inclusivefieldwork.leeds.ac.uk/trans/

a cartoon of three fieldworkers. One has a small trans flag. The logos of the university of leeds, research england, and canopy robin are shown, as well as the URL: InclusiveFieldwork (dot) Leeds (dot) AC (dot) UK (slash) trans

15596441

Reposted by TACC

Lyra 💕 @lyra-scotland.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

Going through the Schools technical guidance for protected characteristics from the EHRC. Its not AS BAD as it could be but still have some very odd/dangerous parts relating to trans people and I think some telling differences between Scotland & England www.equalityhumanrights.com/guidance/tec...

equalityhumanrights.com

Schools in England technical guidance consultation | EHRC

1185

Reposted by TACC

Caroline Litman @alicemydaughter.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

UK government is calling for evidence on puberty suppressing hormones for children and young people with gender incongruence. It’s asking: what research has emerged since 2023. How has the evidence base changed? What makes the evidence hard to generate, evaluate and use in clinical/policy decisions?

post.parliament.uk

Puberty-suppressing hormones for children and young people accessing gender identity services

How has evidence on puberty suppressing hormones for children and young people with gender incongruence evolved since 2023, and what challenges affect its interpretation and use?

1312953

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 24/09/2026

A massive turnout at this protest in Liverpool would be amazing... it would be funny if it outnumbered the people attending 😉✊ metro.co.uk/2026/09/24/i...

metro.co.uk

Inside the protests that threaten to derail Labour conference this weekend

1235

Reposted by TACC

LGBTIQA+ Greens @lgbtiqa.greenparty.org.uk · 24/09/2026

Please can we stop saying "dignity and respect" while those seeking to take away our healthcare use those same words? It's not like we don't deserve dignity and respect, but the words have become so meaningless.

118918

Reposted by TACC

Katie Neeves - Cool2BTrans - Trans Ambassador @cool2btrans.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

Trans kids are no longer safe in UK schools! Please watch my video about my friend's 13-year-old transgender daughter who has been forced to leave school and be home-educated, due to transphobia, DIRECTLY brought about by new anti-trans guidelines for all UK schools. youtu.be/2oQKPYs4k58

youtu.be

Trans kids are no longer safe in UK schools

YouTube video by Cool2BTrans

38135

Reposted by TACC

Robin Moira White @robinmoirawhite.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

‘Answer came there none’ It is now more than 13 weeks since Translucent provided the attached letter as agreed with the Equality & Human Rights Commission. Translucent is still waiting for an answer. Are the questions too hard, EHRC? translucent.org.uk/translucent-...

translucent.org.uk

TransLucent Letter to the EHRC dated June 14th 2026

49233

Reposted by TACC

LGBT+ Liberal Democrats 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ @pluslibdems.bsky.social · 21/09/2026

Lib Dem conference votes overwhelmingly in favour of the motion "Restoring Trans Rights" 🎉🏳️‍⚧️

428475

TACC @tacc.org.uk · 21/09/2026

Great to see today the @libdems.org.uk vote overwhelmingly to restore trans rights in the UK. @rebeccajones03.bsky.social was one of those to speak during the conference. www.youtube.com/live/br_Z_iQ...

youtube.com

Autumn Conference 2026 - Monday Afternoon

YouTube video by Liberal Democrats

26514

Reposted by TACC

TransActual @transactualuk.bsky.social · 16/09/2026

Trans people in Wales have been left in limbo following a decision by NHS Wales to pause access to gender affirming surgeries without warning. Write to the Chief Commissioner at NHS Wales today, and demand that access to surgery is reinstated immediately. actionnetwork.org/letters/4256...

actionnetwork.org

Restore Access to Gender‑Affirming Surgeries in Wales

Trans people in Wales have been left in limbo following a decision by NHS Wales to pause access to gender affirming surgeries without warning. The decision was made by the NHS Wales Joint…

02816

Reposted by TACC

TransActual @transactualuk.bsky.social · 16/09/2026

Trans people in Wales have been left in limbo following a decision by NHS Wales to pause access to gender affirming surgeries without warning. transactual.org.uk/blog/2026/09...

Write to the Chief Commissioner at NHS Wales today, and demand that access to surgery is reinstated immediately.

0185

Reposted by TACC

Cal Horton (they/them) @fiercemum.bsky.social · 15/09/2026

I know GLP are up against a very hostile legal context but this is absolutely a depressing read. Highlighting minor ways in which schools can flex that still leave trans kids in a horrendous & harmful position. These flexes are no where near enough to protect trans kids.

17212

Reposted by TACC

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance @transsolidarity.bsky.social · 15/09/2026

NEW: Llais, the health watchdog for Wales, is investigating the decision by NHS Wales’ Joint Commissioning Committee to indefinitely pause access to gender-affirming surgeries. If you have been affected - they have asked you to share this with them: www.llaiswales.org/news-and-rep...

llaiswales.org

Update on our work regarding NWJCC’s decision to pause gender-affirming surgery | Llais

Ar ddechrau'r mis hwn, cyhoeddodd Gwasanaeth Rhywedd Cymru - a gomisiynwyd gan Gyd-bwyllgor Comisiynu GIG Cymru (CBCGC) ac a gynhaliwyd gan Fwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a'r Fro (BIPCAF) - y byddai ...

115790

Reposted by TACC

What The Trans?! 🏳️‍⚧️ @whatthetrans.com · 15/09/2026

We're in a film that needs your support! It's called TERF Island. A couple years ago we were asked by JJ to be shadowed and sit down for some discussion with the amazing Olivia from Trans Legal Clinic, Shiv, and Jazmeen Qureshi. Please give anything you can! www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/terfisland...

crowdfunder.co.uk

TERF Island

Feature documentary TERF Island provides a much-needed loving anthology of trans lives in the UK.

111766

Reposted by TACC

Bottles @bottles1936.bsky.social · 14/09/2026

Trans people may want to read this extraordinary thread by practising barrister Naomi Cunningham and decide for themselves whether to report it to the Bar Standards Board.

1017955

Reposted by TACC

Not In Our Name (NION) Women @nionwomen.bsky.social · 14/09/2026

“There’s too much media attention on a perceived threat that doesn’t exist. I want to push back against that, to generate a counter balance to the idea that cis women live in fear of trans people.”

Woman with long dark hair smiles calmly. She says: “There's too much media attention on a perceived threat that doesn't exist. I want to push back against that, to generate a counter balance to the idea that cis women live in fear of trans people."

#WhyWeSigned

436194

Reposted by TACC

Philippa East (Author) @philippaeast.bsky.social · 14/09/2026

The NHS Wales JCC subcommittee on Quality, Safety and Outcomes have now released their “Incidents and Concerns” report that was considered at the August 26 meeting, following which all Wales gender reforming surgeries were immediately halted. jcc.nhs.wales/committees/q... 1/

jcc.nhs.wales

715565

Reposted by TACC

Not In Our Name (NION) Women @nionwomen.bsky.social · 13/09/2026

We were so proud to be part of East Coast Pride in Skegness this weekend, alongside a fantastic crowd (despite the rain!) and incredible acts. We also spoke to many brilliant cis women allies keen to sign our letter and show their support for our trans+ siblings. Join them: notinourname.org.uk 🙏

Smiling women stands in front of a festival stage, wearing a Not in our name t-shirts and holding up some stickers. Artists perform on the stage behind her as the crowd watches in the rain

412433

Reposted by TACC

Erin Reed @erininthemorning.com · 13/09/2026

Seems like a good time to re-up this post. It is a list of 26 Dems at the statewide/national level that have made anti-trans statements or voted anti-trans policies. I do not advocate for abstaining from all of the ones on this list, but if the worst offenders who call us “biological men,” I do.

erininthemorning.com

The Guide To Anti-Trans Democrats In The 2026 Elections, By State

These are the Democrats that LGBTQ+ people may wish to avoid this election cycle.

741821604

TACC @tacc.org.uk · 12/09/2026

Though we don't always agree with Bash Back we wholeheartedly stand against this attack by far right extremists on their right to protest in a manner they see fit. When we have Reform and Tory assembly members calling on the Government to proscribe activists group when their own politicians stir

15816

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 11/09/2026

"The Government have rejected concerns raised by a panel of eleven UN experts who say EHRC guidance on single-sex spaces risks 'institutionalising discrimination,' against trans people." thebricknewspaper.substack.com/p/government...

thebricknewspaper.substack.com

Government rejects UN experts’ warning on single-sex spaces guidance

“There are clear laws in place to protect trans people from discrimination,” a Government spokesperson said.

1415751

Reposted by TACC

Mise @misebanbha.bsky.social · 10/09/2026

Favourite paragraph in a judgement goes to: "Dr. Helen Joyce [..] has a PhD in mathematics, but does not have any formal education or qualifications even in biology, let alone in gender, sex or law, being the topics which her report addresses.

15714

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 10/09/2026

When we say trans people are being targeted, we mean it. "[They] asked her to accompany them to their boat... there was no boat...the men then pushed her to the ground...grabbed her by the neck, ripped out her hair extensions...tore off her clothes before they began hitting her."

them.us

Two Men Charged Over Sexual Assault of Trans Woman on UW-Madison Campus

Two men were charged on September 1 for allegedly strangling and sexually assaulting a transgender woman on the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus over the weekend, in the early morning of August ...

0228

Reposted by TACC

TransActual @transactualuk.bsky.social · 10/09/2026

Over 3000 People have already responded! Can you help us reach more people than ever before? Respond to our Trans Lives Survey today, and share on your social media, so we can get a full picture of the experiences and views of trans people in the UK. form.typeform.com/to/BRppksJ3

A pink and blue graphic with a black and white cartoon of some people on the bottom.

Text reads: TransActual is launching its biggest survey for the trans community yet!

TRANS LIVES SURVEY

2026

We want to hear about your experiences as a trans person living in the UK.

It's quick, anonymous, and will help us campaign for our community!

01812

TACC @tacc.org.uk · 10/09/2026

The appeal in the case of Giggle v Tickle - the case that, humorously and accurately, told Helen Joyce that she is "no expert" - has been denied: www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/view...

austlii.edu.au

47211

Reposted by TACC

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance @transsolidarity.bsky.social · 09/09/2026

Thank you so much to the hundreds of trans people and allies who joined today's mass lobby! The queue stretched across both sides of the road outside Parliament, and so many MPs participated in meetings and responded to green cards. Together, we delivered a powerful message for change 🏳️‍⚧️

3375111

Reposted by TACC

รℓσαɳε ℓყรɓεƭɦ @sloanelysbeth.bsky.social · 09/09/2026

‘protesters’ our media is the problem. stop legitimising far right groups.

34612

Reposted by TACC

Count Binface @countbinface.bsky.social · 09/09/2026

You might have to turn up for the results of this one, Nige.

13353341299

Reposted by TACC

Snigdha @snig.bsky.social · 08/09/2026

Not everyone's train journey is the same.

A lone black woman on a train.
Her carriage is full of masked white men going to march for white supremacy.

Three white women on a train smiling. Their carriage is full of masked white men going to block the port of Dover.

12681213

Reposted by TACC

River @riverofdiversity.bsky.social · 08/09/2026

"Biological Sex" is an inherently nonsense term that doesn't map to how biologist reproductive development. For a start biologist distinguish between 'phenotype' (Primary & secondary sex characteristics) & 'Genotype' (Sex chromosomes), neither of which are binary & phenotype changes with hormones.

1192

Reposted by TACC

River @riverofdiversity.bsky.social · 08/09/2026

Late to this: Being trans is inherently biological - it is a divergent biochemical response to hormones. Cis & trans men can have an adverse response to high levels of oestrogen. Cis & trans women have an adverse response to too low levels of oestrogen (See menopause) Symptoms are very similar.

1142

Reposted by TACC

Lee Hurley @hleehurley.com · 08/09/2026

"A female PE teacher accused of having sex with a 16-year-old schoolboy said she was not ready to be a teacher in her mid-twenties, was emotionally immature and “seeking validation” from her pupils." [Times, under the headline 'Teacher accused of sex with pupil ‘wanted to be liked’']

9607

Reposted by TACC

TACC @tacc.org.uk · 19/08/2026

We’ve submitted a formal complaint to the Charity Commission about Sex Matters, raising concerns about its conduct, campaigning and the potential harm caused to trans people. Our full evidence is attached so you can see exactly what we’ve put to the regulator. tacc.org.uk/2026/08/19/t...

tacc.org.uk

TACC raises a complaint with the Charity Commission about Sex Matters

We have submitted a formal complaint to the Charity Commission about the registered charity Sex Matters (1207701). Our complaint raises serious concerns about the organisation’s conduct, including it...

325787

Reposted by TACC

GeekOnALeash 🏳️‍⚧️ @geekonaleash.co.uk · 07/09/2026

Posie 'KKK' Parker wants to repatriate British citizens; this is who organisations like Sex Mattress align themselves with.

"Kellie-Jay Keen
@ThePosieParker
·
44m
Repatriation would be much more noble than reparations.
Quote
GB News
@GBNEWS
·
1h
'Britain ended slavery a long time ago!'

Martin Daubney clashes with anti-racism campaigner Imarn Ayton. She believes Jamaica should be awarded slavery reparations.
"

1195