iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

PID Network Deutschland @pidnetworkde.bsky.social · 24/08/2026

Die PID-Roadmap für Deutschland ist da!🚀 Unser strategischer Fahrplan zur nachhaltigen Verankerung von Persistent Identifier in Wissenschaft & Kultur spricht 5 konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen aus. ➡️https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21703674 #PIDs @datacite.org @helmholtzosoffice.bsky.social

Die PID-Roadmap zeigt, wie PIDs in Deutschland zukünftig weiterentwickelt werden können.

187

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 15/08/2026

New Blog post: Which Data Repository Should you Use? In light of OSF closing down, I compare Zenodo, Dataverse, ResearchBox, PsychArchive, and local repositories on six important dimensions. If you want to know which to pick: It depends! daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/08/whic...

daniellakens.blogspot.com

Which Data Repository Should You Use?

The Center for Open Science has announced that from November 16, 2026, no new projects can be created on the Open Science Framework. After F...

4198112

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 14/08/2026

Two junior research fellowships @kingscollege.bsky.social opening soon due on Oct 1st. The theme is REPLICATION conceived broadly to encompass different research projects in humanities and social sciences. As a philosopher of science I am esp hoping for applications in #philsci #metascience #hps

kings.cam.ac.uk

Current research opportunities

48684

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 14/08/2026

The Metacheck Shiny app to download all private OSF Repositories is done. The manual is updated, and everything is in the dev branch on GitHub. As a bonus, we explain how you can run repo_check, data_check, code_check, and codebook_check on your repository with 1 line of code. Launch next week.

14019

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 13/08/2026

My favorite Metascience conference will land in Copenhagen next year. The 9th (!) edition of the Perspectives on Science Error conference will be from January 27 to 29. Block your calendar, and see you there! errorsin.science

errorsin.science

Perspectives on Scientific Error 2027 · PSE9

Johanna Einsiedler, University of Copenhagen & University of Basel, johanna.einsiedler@sodas.ku.dk

12815

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Uri Simonsohn @urisohn.bsky.social · 11/08/2026

Here is what i think the head-to-head comparison of ResearchBox vs Zenodo look like as OSF replacements. If I am missing an important attribute, let me know, will update accordingly.

97232

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 11/08/2026

Over the next several months, we will phase out some popular OSF features. These changes do not affect current public content, which remains safe and accessible. We have prepared support material to help users adapt. I am very sorry for the disruption to your work. Please read this post for details.

cos.io

OSF Changes | Center for Open Science

We are preparing substantial changes to OSF that will reduce its functionality, focus OSF on its unique strengths, and move toward an integrated model with complementary services. As part of that shif...

10120113

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Russ Poldrack @russpoldrack.org · 11/08/2026

Many of you will have seen the recent post about changes at OSF. If you'd like to learn more about how to use other services (particularly Zenodo) to share data and code, see my book chapter on resource sharing. bettercode-book.org/book-sharing...

bettercode-book.org

12 Sharing Research Objects – Better Code, Better Science

317783

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Martin Paul Eve @eve.gd · 06/08/2026

"Researchers may cite an infrastructure as a necessary part of their work in a grant proposal, but funding flows only to the researcher and research project, not the repository." issues.org/open-data-re...

issues.org

Who Will Keep Research Data Infrastructure Open and Running? | Real Numbers

The scientific community must consider the longevity of open research infrastructure—why it might fail and how to prevent it.

0136

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Vishnu Sreekumar @vishnusreekumar.bsky.social · 05/08/2026

📢 ***Call for papers at Psychological Science (APS)*** Dr Roni Porat and I are editing a special issue, "From Lab to Life: Psychological Science in the Real World.” Please see the detailed call here (www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...) and send us your best work!

41923

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Crystal Lewis @cghlewis.bsky.social · 27/07/2026

Always share a data dictionary along with your data so that people aren't guessing what a variable represents. There are many options for creating one (see thread for examples). Choose which one works best for you and share it alongside your data files. :)

512926

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Martin Paul Eve @eve.gd · 15/07/2026

Rereading Suber (2012) this AM for a research article. doi.org/10.7551/mitp... Have we abandoned his definitions -- thought fairly canonical -- with terms like diamond? A short thread. Suber: all “OA delivered by journals is called gold OA, and OA delivered by repositories is called green OA” (6)

doi.org

Open Access

A concise introduction to the basics of open access, describing what it is (and isn't) and showing that it is easy, fast, inexpensive, legal, and beneficia

1114

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Noah Haber @whaleactually.com · 07/07/2026

For most scientific papers, coathors collaborate in the manuscript doc and someone manually enters analysis results/tables/figures into it. In this case, reproducibility effectively stops at the data and code. What this blog post presupposes is, what if it didn't? www.cos.io/blog/toward-...

cos.io

Toward Collaborative Reproducible Manuscripts

The first active phase of COS's Benchmarking LLM Agents on Scientific Tasks project has produced ReplicatorBench—a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on research replication in social & behavioral sc...

2286

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Cailin O’Connor @cailinmeister.bsky.social · 06/07/2026

Philosophers! Craig Callender and I are circulating an open letter calling for better COI disclosure in our journals. If tech companies fund and employ philosophers working on AI, we need to know and to be thinking about the impacts 1 docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

docs.google.com

Open Letter about Industry Funding and Disclosure in Philosophy

*For full list of signatories, updated every few hours, please click here.* In recent years, philosophical writing on areas such as climate change, technology, misinformation, and artificial intellige...

14733

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Sasha Costanza-Chock @schock.cc · 19/06/2026

The most dangerous thing about AI is not that the machines might one day think. It is that we are being trained, by men with enormous financial gains riding on our acquiescence, to stop thinking for ourselves.

3728501100

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 27/05/2026

Excellent news! Nature is expanding Registered Reports to all the fields in which they publish! A great result by all those proposing this strong solution to publication bias and selective reporting (and getting expert feedback before data collection)! www.nature.com/articles/d41...

114273

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Angela Cassidy @angecass.bsky.social · 11/04/2026

Sounding another Egenis job klaxon! My excellent colleague Stefan Guttinger is looking for a #philsci postdoc to think through #AI agents and trustworthy knowledge in the biosciences. 4 year post! #HPS #STS

11612

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 22/02/2026

Kareem Khalifa is assembling a list of journals that either specialise or regularly publish work in philosophy of social science. A great service but I need this list to be longer! Please add to it #philsci #philsky

possrt.wordpress.com

Journals

This is our best attempt at a comprehensive guide for journals that publish in philosophy of social science. If we have either misrepresented or omitted a journal and you are on the editorial board…

23013

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Malte Elson @malte.the100.ci · 13/02/2026

New paper, on a worrying trend in meta-science: the practice of anonymising datasets on, e.g., published articles. We argue that this is at odds with norms established in research synthesis, explore arguments for anonymisation, provide counterpoints, and demonstrate implications and epistemic costs.

69752

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Balazs Aczel @balazsaczel.bsky.social · 12/02/2026

Our lab has the capacity to test ~500 uni students each semester If you’re a researcher in cognitive psychology or metascience and need data collection support, we’d love to collaborate. We can help collect high-quality data from a large student sample. Get in touch to discuss potential projects!

32621

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Vincent Traag @vtraag.bsky.social · 27/01/2026

📣 Our introduction to structural causal models in science studies is now published: doi.org/10.1162/QSS.... @tklebel.bsky.social and I tried to make our introduction as accessible as possible. We illustrate the theory by three case studies based on a simulated model of Open Science. 🧵(1/6)

29439

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Andrew Perfors @perfors.net · 22/01/2026

I just created a series of seven deep-dive videos about AI, which I've posted to youtube and now here. 😊 Targeted to laypeople, they explore how LLMs work, what they can do, and what impacts they have on learning, well-being, disinformation, the workplace, the economy, and the environment.

youtube.com

Part 1: How do LLMs work?

YouTube video by Andrew Perfors

20505194

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 22/01/2026

@forrt.bsky.social and the Münster Center for Open Science are organizing a Love Replications Week this year. Get in touch if you would like to contribute with tutorials, case studies, or discussions surrounding #reproductions and #replications! The full program will be announced soon!

11620

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 22/01/2026

Comparing registrations to published papers is essential to research integrity - and almost no one does it routinely because it's slow, messy, and time-demanding. RegCheck was built to help make this process easier. Today, we launch RegCheck V2. 🧵 regcheck.app

regcheck.app

RegCheck

RegCheck is an AI tool to compare preregistrations with papers instantly.

818696

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 15/01/2026

📽️ "Taboo topics we can no longer avoid: negligence, tampering, and fraud" / with Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io youtu.be/sdRRafephyM?... The event was organised by ReproducibiliTea UniBasel @swissrn.bsky.social

youtu.be

Open Science Basel Year 6 #4 - Ian Hussey

YouTube video by BAMM

01712

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Edouard Machery @edouardmachery.bsky.social · 15/01/2026

There is something there but as usual the appeal to incentives to make sense of social phenomena- in this case bad science- is a just so story with little evidence supporting it. See my forthcoming book on trust in science for more on that idea.

5193

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Toby Handfield @tobyhandfield.bsky.social · 11/01/2026

Some fields list authors alphabetically. Others use norms like "senior last". Others use order to signify relative contributions. In a new paper with @kevinzollman.com, we model the evolution of these norms, and then look at which type of norm is best for science. doi.org/10.1098/rsos...

doi.org

The evolution of scientific credit: when authorship norms impede collaboration

Abstract. Scientific authorship norms vary dramatically across disciplines, from contribution-sensitive systems where first author is the greatest contribu

22913

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Jessie Baldwin @jessiebaldwin.bsky.social · 07/01/2026

Can AI be used to evaluate open science practices? 🤖🔎 Join us to find out from Dr Daryl Lee at the next ReproducibiliTea! 🫖 📅 Jan 13th, 3pm GMT www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/evaluating... @tabeasch.bsky.social @uclopenscience.bsky.social @uclpals.bsky.social @reproducibilitea.org @ukrepro.bsky.social

eventbrite.co.uk

Evaluating open science practices with AI, with Dr Daryl Lee

Join Dr. Yu Heng Daryl Lee to learn about the efficacy of AI in evaluating open science practices.

065

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

William Ngiam | 严祥全 @williamngiam.github.io · 07/01/2026

One of the best ways for early-career researchers to create community within their department and effect change towards doing open and thoughtful research is to start a ReproducibiliTea journal club. We've distilled our network's experience into a set of simple rules to follow and get started!

02311

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 07/01/2026

📢 New preprint! Ten Simple Rules for Running a ReproducibiliTea Journal Club 🔗 doi.org/10.31222/osf... Our aim is to equip you as early career researchers with the tools needed to lead grassroots change in research culture. #reproducibility #openresearch #openscience #metasci #academicsky

Benefits of being involved in a ReproducibiliTea journal club

11914

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Swiss Reproducibility Network @swissrn.bsky.social · 09/01/2026

Our local node at the University of Zurich, the @crs-uzh.bsky.social is organizing a Research on Research event on January 29 and 30, 2026. You can still register until 12 January. Join us to shape future Research on Research collaborations in Switzerland! Find the program here: www.ror-event.ch

ror-event.ch

Research on Research Event – RoR Event 2026

053

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 09/01/2026

Our special issue with @martinkusch.bsky.social is finally complete and here’s at long last our introduction. I pitched the idea to him in 2019! Thank you for your patience and generosity, Martin. I am proud of this manifesto and hope colleagues will join us in rethinking this old debate #philsci

sciencedirect.com

"Why do we argue about the specialness of the social sciences?"

28328

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Lynn Chiu @drlynnchiu.bsky.social · 07/01/2026

Please share widely! #ESTEEM #postdoc CFA: 20 positions for female scientists in natural sciences, life sciences, economics @univie.ac.at: careers.univie.ac.at/en/postdoc/e... To save you a click: PhD completed in 2022 or after (minus career interruption), defended by deadline #UniVienna

12119

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Nature @nature.com · 31/12/2025

Journals that work hard to meet the needs of both authors and readers should be acknowledged publicly — encouraging others to follow suit, says researcher Jennifer A. Byrne go.nature.com/4sgKWzg

go.nature.com

Put pressure on publishers to follow best practice — external regulation is the answer

Journals that work hard to meet the needs of both authors and readers should be acknowledged publicly — encouraging others to follow suit.

0288

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 31/12/2025

one unexpected outlook change from being a dad is taking the self care people 10x more seriously when it comes to dealing with weirdly directed anger and rage (including Online). many angry posts should have been naps or little packets of crackers

734133587

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Chris Lintott @chrislintott.bsky.social · 24/12/2025

Parents & anyone else up early on Christmas morning: there’s a bright pass of the International Space Station over the UK, just after 6.15. Well, I say it’s the ISS. Could be Santa heading home… Exact timings for where you are at www.heavens-above.com/PassSummary....

heavens-above.com

ISS - Visible Passes

Satellite predictions and other astronomical data customised for your location.

612474

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 22/12/2025

'The “big five” academic publishers have all reached agreements with UK universities, with a trial that will remove fees on a per article basis from certain journals being hailed as a “global first”.'

timeshighereducation.com

UK publishing deals with ‘big five’ hailed as ‘key milestone’

‘Global first’ agreements break link between pricing and the number of articles published for the first time

384

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Adam Sharp @adamcsharp.bsky.social · 18/12/2025

My top five favourite words to pronounce like they’re Greek philosophers… 5. Monocles 4. Bicycles 3. Popsicles 2. Obstacles 1. Testicles

89835186

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Sabrina Norwood @sabrinanorwood.bsky.social · 16/12/2025

Did you know that from tomorrow, Qualtrics is offering synthetic panels (AI-generated participants)? Follow me down a rabbit hole I'm calling "doing science is tough and I'm so busy, can't we just make up participants?"

Text reads: About synthetic panels
Recruiting the right participants for a study can be difficult. You may not get the exact demographics you need, and the shorter the deadline, the less sure you can be that everyone will answer on time. One possible solution can be to use synthetic panels.

Synthetic panels are powered by a first party proprietary AI model developed here at Qualtrics. Our synthetic panel is trained on thousands of responses from a variety of demographic backgrounds in order to more accurately predict how certain populations would respond to a survey.

Our synthetic panel is based on the United States General Population, and is only available in English. This panel comes with ready-made quotas and target breakouts in order to represent your chosen population and make it easy to launch your survey right away.

Text reads:
Discussion
The current study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of the TPB when applied to health behaviours which addressed the limitations of previous reviews by including only prospective tests of behaviour, applying RE meta-analytic procedures, correcting correlations for sampling and measurement error, and hierarchically analysing the effect of behaviour type and sample and methodological moderators. Some 237 tests were identified which examined relations amongst model components. Overall the analysis indicated that the TPB could explain 19.3% of the variance in behaviour and 44.3% of the variance in intention across studies. This level of prediction of behaviour is slightly lower than that of previous meta-analytic reviews which have found between 27% (Armitage & Conner, 2001; Hagger et al., 2002) and 36% (Trafimow et al., 2002)
of the variance in behaviour to be explained by intention and PBC.

37652285

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Elisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 14/12/2025

Stealth Corrections are corrections that are not marked at all, not traceable, unless you compare an old copy of the paper to the current version. See this paper by @deadneanderthals.bsky.social et al. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

The Existence of Stealth Corrections in Scientific Literature—A Threat to Scientific Integrity

Click on the article title to read more.

03613

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Jaclyn A. Siegel, PhD @jacasiegel.bsky.social · 09/12/2025

Sometimes, I reminisce about academic Twitter the same way I reminisce about theater camp. We were all together in this wonderful and complicated and often messy space for a short time, where we built community and created something wonderful. Then the summer ended, and the magic was gone.

422317

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 09/12/2025

I maintain that this is an excellent benchmark for d-type effect sizes: Sleep satisfaction & duration declined with childbirth & reached a nadir during the first 3 months postpartum, with women more strongly affected (satisfaction d = -0.79, duration minus 62 min, d = -0.90)>

academic.oup.com

Long-term effects of pregnancy and childbirth on sleep satisfaction and duration of first-time and experienced mothers and fathers

AbstractStudy Objectives. To examine the changes in mothers’ and fathers’ sleep satisfaction and sleep duration across prepregnancy, pregnancy, and the pos

68125

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Rebecca Sear @rebeccasear.bsky.social · 07/12/2025

“Farid says that he now counsels students to not go into AI research, because of the “frenzy” in the field and the large volume of low-quality work being put out by people hoping to better their career prospects” www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

theguardian.com

Artificial intelligence research has a slop problem, academics say: ‘It’s a mess’

AI research in question as author claims to have written over 100 papers on AI that one expert calls a ‘disaster’

16618

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 01/12/2025

CNRS cancels Web of Science in order to focus on qualitative evaluation and promoting the development of open databases. www.cnrs.fr/en/update/cn...

cnrs.fr

The CNRS is breaking free from the Web of Science

From January 1st 2026, the CNRS will cut access to one of the largest commercial bibliometric databases, Clarivate Analytics'

14730

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Kevin Sanders @kjsanders.eurosky.social · 28/11/2025

A reminder that "[o]ne should not think of OA as a thing-in-itself; rather, it should be seen as a process of understanding, engaging and experimenting with the ways in which research is presented and disseminated." (@samuelmoore.org, 2017)

151

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 25/11/2025

Preregistrations without Code do not Prevent P-Hacking: You can increase your chances for a significant finding in the absence of real effects even with correlations and t test despite having preregistered your hypothesis (e.g., simply changing arguments in the functions). doi.org/10.31222/osf...

0109

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 24/11/2025

I think it's hard to overstate how much Simine has changed research practices and standards in psychology for the better, despite at times massive resistance from powerful parties with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Very well deserved award imho 🥳

013528

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Tom Hardwicke @tomhardwicke.bsky.social · 24/11/2025

Congratulations to @simine.com well deserved winner of the Einstein Foundation Individual Award for Promoting Quality in Research 2025 🎉 www.einsteinfoundation.de/en/media/pre...

413130

Reposted by Sophia Crüwell

Matthew Cheney @melikhovo.bsky.social · 21/11/2025

Just saw someone described as an "ontologist" and now I want Clinical Ontologist to be a job title. Welcome to the Department of Clinical Ontology. Let's go over your chart. I see that you are. Are you still as you were or are you otherwise? For your case of being, I prescribe becoming.

025476