Sign in

Ben Tappin

@benmtappin.bsky.social
2.2K followers 427 following 90 posts

• Assistant professor, London School of Economics and Political Science • Persuasion, technology, experiments • benmtappin.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Ben Tappin
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
New paper! Despite qualitative researchers claiming that generalizability is not a goal, their published work does indeed contain generalizable claims. We document this and provide recommendations for how all researchers can better calibrate their generalizability claims. doi.org/10.1177/2515...
article header for, "Qualitative Researchers Can and Do Generalize: Generalizability Claims in Qualitative Psychological Research". Metascience!
619255
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Brendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Extremely impressive field experiment by @nmalhotra.bsky.social et al. had few effects on election attitudes among conservatives in TX despite being "exposed to an average of 20 online videos, 18.5 cable TV videos, 23.9 display ads, 3 text messages, and 3 postcards" www.science.org/doi/full/10....
110733
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Felix M. Simon @felixsimon.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
Back from my summer break with a piece for @transformernews.ai on why the impact of persuasive AI's will be smaller in the real world than some think because (1) it is hard to reach people and get their attention… buff.ly/TvWgFSH
transformernews.ai
AI is a worryingly-good persuader. But don’t panic, yet
AI systems are able to persuade people, but turning that ability into meaningful real-world influence may be harder
295
Reposted by Ben Tappin
LSE Department of Psychological & Behavioural Science @lsepbs.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
After six years as Head of the Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, Professor Liam Delaney is handing over the role to Professor Alex Gillespie. We're grateful to Liam for his leadership and delighted to welcome Alex as our new Head of Department. Learn more 👇️
lse.ac.uk
Professor Alex Gillespie appointed Head of PBS | LSE
Professor Alex Gillespie has been appointed Head of LSE’s Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, succeeding Professor Liam Delaney.
063
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 27/08/2026
Psychological Science special issue call 📣 Ever had your research denigrated bc it's "only descriptive", "what's the mechanism though?" and "but what are the theoretical implications?" Now has come your time to shine. Send your best descriptive work! www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
Psychological Science invites submissions that advance psychological science through careful description of psychological phenomena. Psychological research often focuses on explaining and predicting phenomena before we have a sufficiently detailed understanding of them. It can be difficult to build strong theories on incomplete empirical foundations of the phenomena themselves. Careful descriptive research helps establish shared empirical reference points developed around well-characterized phenomena. As such, descriptive research contributes to psychological science both by improving our understanding of the phenomena themselves and by providing a stronger foundation for future theory-building, explanation, and prediction.

We are interested in manuscripts that:

Deepen our understanding of psychological phenomena, including what they look like, how they vary, and how they unfold;
Draw on a variety of sources of evidence and methods, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches; research conducted in naturalistic settings; intensive, longitudinal, or small-sample designs; and open or large-scale datasets; 
Provide necessary context for interpreting what is being described, including who is represented in the data, the settings and circumstances in which phenomena occur, and the broader social contexts in which they are situated; and/or
Make a substantive contribution to psychological science through the quality, depth, or significance of the description provided.
The deadline for submitting regular manuscripts is April 15, 2027. Registered Reports will also be considered. The deadline for submitting Stage 1 Registered Reports is November 15, 2026. Authors should indicate in the “Comments to Editor” box during submission that the manuscript is intended for the “Descriptive Research in Psychological Science” special issue.
7244128
Reposted by Ben Tappin
vincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
As promised, we now share some details why it took 32 months to get this Matters Arising published, and, since many asked, share some comments on the reply to our critique. All details can be found in this small FAQ vincentholst.github.io/the_curious_.... Below is a summary 🧵
vincentholst.github.io
The Curious Case of the Declining Disruption’s Disappearance
48348
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
There are still a few days to apply to work with me and @malte.the100.ci as a PhD or postdoc on the development and evaluation of RegCheck. Help us research whether RegCheck works in practice in helping to reduce preregistration-paper discrepancies. Apply below!
01416
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 20/07/2026
New paper out now 🥳 When psychologists discuss generalisability, they often refer to vague notions of representativeness. We provide an accessible intro to the total survey error framework as a tool to reason about this more rigorously. w @taymalsalti.bsky.social @ruben.the100.ci >
Thinking Clearly About Sampling and Representation With the Total Survey Error Framework

Collecting a sample that represents the population of interest well constitutes a challenge across the social and behavioural sciences. Psychology in particular frequently relies on convenience samples—most notably students and, increasingly, online participants—with a tendency to either (implicitly) assume representativeness without substantive justification, or to acknowledge a lack of it only in passing. In contrast, researchers rarely engage with the actual implications for their inferences, which undermines the generalisability of psychological findings. Critically, representativeness must be defined with respect to variables relevant to the target of inference, rather than superficial demographic diversity. Here we present the Total Survey Error (TSE) framework as a methodological tool that systematically addresses the multifaceted sources of error—particularly those related to representation—that emerge throughout the research cycle. Although TSE originated in survey research, its principles are broadly applicable to any psychological study seeking inference from sample to population. We offer practical strategies for identifying, preventing, and mitigating representation errors to improve the credibility and generalisability of psychological research.

Illustration of the total survey error framework with the representation strand highlighted. It shows how coverage error, sampling error and non-response error arise during the sampling process.
1027797
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Brendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Important @benmtappin.bsky.social on the need to carefully consider the relevant counterfactual when evaluating AI chatbots (also applies to social media!) benmtappin.substack.com/p/are-ai-cha...
2287
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Georgia Tomova @georgiatomova.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
Why we should rethink causal mediation, and what to do instead? Come to hear the answer from Vanessa Didelez at the next CIIG seminar! The seminar will be hybrid. If you are in London, come join us in person at UCL! Otherwise, you can join on Zoom as usual. Registration links in comment below.
Vanessa Didelez, 8th June 2026 3 to 4.30pm. Why we should rethink causal mediation and what to do instead
44615
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Len Metson @lenmetson.com · 27/04/2026
Really helpful framework for thinking about the utility of survey experiments for practitioners by @benmtappin.bsky.social 👇 www.benmtappin.com/publication/...
benmtappin.com
Thinking clearly about the value of survey pretesting for practitioners | Ben Tappin
A research note in which I articulate a simple framework to try and facilitate clearer thinking about the value of survey pretesting for practitioners.
141
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Michael Muthukrishna @michael.muthukrishna.com · 14/04/2026
How do you align AI in a world of plural, conflicting, and evolving human values? A starting point is human society itself. @sydneylevine.bsky.social and I are hiring a postdoc at NYU to combine insights from cultural evolution, computational moral cognition, and AI safety. Please share widely!1/
164
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 27/03/2026
I wonder how these rates of sycophancy (and their effects) compare against realistic counterfactuals like talking with one’s close friends or spouse.
040
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Ben Ansell @benansell.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
📣 New job at Oxford's Centre for Advanced Social Science Methods (CASSM)! 📣 The Departments of Politics & IR (DPIR) and Social Policy and Intervention (DSPI) are hiring an Associate Professor of Causal and Experimental Methods. Come work with me and amazing Oxford peeps! Deadline NOON April 27th.
politics.ox.ac.uk
Associate Professorship of Causal and Experimental Methods in Politics and Social Policy
University salary from £58,265 - £77,645 per annum which is inclusive of an Oxford University Weighting of £1,730 p.aPermanent upon completion of a successful review. The review is conducted during th...
14756
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 22/03/2026
The synth backing track takes the vibe to an unexpected place 🥲
000
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 21/03/2026
Closing out the teaching semester this week with one of my favourite topics. Sadly its pedagogy was forever and unforgivably mar'd by the truly worst naming convention of all time...
Terminator (missing data) stalking a scared child (researchers).
2290
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Will Lowe @conjugateprior.org · 21/03/2026
"The book of y tho" by Judea Pearl
1335
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 21/03/2026
Yes. Then if you push on this the claim becomes “okay it may not cause but it’s still useful because it predicts”. But then it’s like if predictive accuracy was your goal the design and analysis should be different e.g., CV + more predictors. I’ve been fully Westfall & Yarkoni-pilled on this point.
2191
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Lauren Leek @laurenleek.eu · 16/03/2026
Sydney named its socio-economic divide the "latte line" and has been arguing about who drew it for 20 years. London has the same divide and calls it "character." I built a machine learning model to do the impolite thing: draw it and blame someone. open.substack.com/pub/laurenle...
open.substack.com
London's Divide Was Called Character. It Was Actually Policy.
I built a machine learning model to find London's divide and you can enter your postcode to see which side you're on. We've been blaming the wrong people for it.
25717
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Joey Politano🏳️‍🌈 @josephpolitano.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
someone at the pentagon frantically typing “Claude, open the strait of Hormuz for me, quickest possible strategy, make no mistakes.”
15779061200
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
The character of Per’s posts increasingly remind me of when an LLM talks to itself (not derogatory)
120
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 05/03/2026
The idea of the need for a control group may have been radical at the time, but trust me it's now generally accepted. This is not some fringe believe by methodological hardliners; it's established practice. www.clinicaltrialsabundance.blog/p/clinical-t...
clinicaltrialsabundance.blog
Clinical trial reforms that once seemed radical
How randomized controlled trials, preregistration, and results reporting became standard practice.
1183
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Anne Scheel @annemscheel.bsky.social · 27/02/2026
New newspaper headline for your Intro to Causal Inference lecture just dropped
416633
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 26/02/2026
Planning my next conversation starter
“I don’t like tibbles”, “pipes are overrated”, “loops are great actually”, … what’s next?

Ah yes — the R contrarian character arc 😄
If we continue the escalation, the next stages usually look like:
	•	“Actually, base R plotting is more transparent.”
	•	“data.table was right all along.”
	•	“I write my own S3 methods for fun.”
	•	“Vectorization is just premature optimization avoidance.”
	•	“apply() is perfectly readable.”
	•	“Why depend on 40 packages for a left join?”
	•	“I don’t trust NSE.”
	•	“Magrittr changed evaluation semantics and nobody talks about it.”
	•	“One well-written for-loop beats clever code.”
	•	“I opened the tidyverse source code once and never recovered.”
2110010
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 27/02/2026
I too was very glad to see this! But I feel like the whole episode bodes badly for the future. It’s not sustainable to rely on the CEO of a private company to act against their financial self-interest in order to curtail high-risk AI deployment (here mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons).
140
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Prolific @joinprolific.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
🔔 “How real is the LLM threat to online research in academia?” will be live today. Experts from Microsoft Research, MIT / Stanford, Max Planck Institute, and Prolific discuss the threat of agentic AI to online research, and how to protect against it. Link to join live below. #AcademicSky #Research
173
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
Reposting for visibility. Many researchers still appear oblivious to this fact, which is terrifying! It should be included in every experiment design 101.
070
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Ryan Briggs @ryancbriggs.net · 11/02/2026
When I pitch academics on my paper on nulls one common and understandable reaction is "but they're probably noisy and thus uninformative nulls." This is true, but it misses the key realization that WE PUBLISH THE RESULT WHEN THE NOISY TEST IS P<0.05.
1364
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Ryan Briggs @ryancbriggs.net · 11/02/2026
I have a new paper. We look at ~all stats articles in political science post-2010 & show that 94% have abstracts that claim to reject a null. Only 2% present only null results. This is hard to explain unless the research process has a filter that only lets rejections through.
It must be very hard to publish null results
Publication practices in the social sciences act as a filter that favors statistically significant results over null findings. While the problem of selection on significance (SoS) is well-known in theory, it has been difficult to measure its scope empirically, and it has been challenging to determine how selection varies across contexts. In this article, we use large language models to extract granular and validated data on about 100,000 articles published in over 150 political science journals from 2010 to 2024. We show that fewer than 2% of articles that rely on statistical methods report null-only findings in their abstracts, while over 90% of papers highlight significant results. To put these findings in perspective, we develop and calibrate a simple model of publication bias. Across a range of plausible assumptions, we find that statistically significant results are estimated to be one to two orders of magnitude more likely to enter the published record than null results. Leveraging metadata extracted from individual articles, we show that the pattern of strong SoS holds across subfields, journals, methods, and time periods. However, a few factors such as pre-registration and randomized experiments correlate with greater acceptance of null results. We conclude by discussing implications for the field and the potential of our new dataset for investigating other questions about political science.
29643220
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Felix M. Simon @felixsimon.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
@benmtappin.bsky.social I just was pointed to this which is much more thorough and arrives at the same conclusion: www.exponentialview.co/p/how-95-esc... The "95% fail" number is essentially meaningless
exponentialview.co
How “95%” escaped into the world – and why so many believed it
Challenging sloppy thinking
011
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
Felix and friends looking closely at the details so you don’t have to 👌👇
120
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Felix M. Simon @felixsimon.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
A short note on questionable AI studies or why friends don’t let friends make %-claims based on small-n qualitative research interview reports New week, new AI newsletter from Marina and myself here at RISJ: buff.ly/ckaUSn9
154
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 07/02/2026
It’s that time of year again
010
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Kevin Collins @kwcollins.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
Interesting new paper in Political Psychology from @benmtappin.bsky.social and Ryan McKay investigating party cues onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
266
Reposted by Ben Tappin
David Rand @dgrand.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
🚨New WP "@Grok is this true?" We analyze 1.6M factcheck requests on X (grok & Perplexity) 📌Usage is polarized, Grok users more likely to be Reps 📌BUT Rep posts rated as false more often—even by Grok 📌Bot agreement with factchecks is OK but not great; APIs match fact-checkers osf.io/preprints/ps...
211747
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Jonathan Birch @birchlse.bsky.social · 30/01/2026
My Centre is a unique place to do a PhD in Philosophy, because you can be in constant contact with experts in veterinary medicine, psychology, zoology and policy and be part of a team united by a shared interest in animal minds. We now have our 1st ever PhD scholarship: www.lse.ac.uk/sentience/phd
lse.ac.uk
PhD Scholarship
114476
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Miriam Sorace @miriamsorace.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
📢 JOB ALERT! Postdoc opportunity in Political Behaviour & Political Economy (UKRI‑funded) - Please do share with anyone who might be a great fit. If you’re interested or would like to know more, please feel free to get in touch!! jobs.reading.ac.uk/Job/JobDetai...
jobs.reading.ac.uk
Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Quantitative Political Behaviour and Political Economy:Whiteknights Reading UK
The closing date for applications is 23.59 on 22nd February 2026
02930
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Alex Coppock @aecoppock.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
🎺 Call for proposals 🎺 1️⃣ replicate an existing experiment 2️⃣ run a novel experiment on repdata.com 3️⃣ coauthor with Mary McGrath and me to meta-analyze the replications and existing studies 4️⃣ publish your study details: alexandercoppock.com/replication_... applications open Feb 1 please repost!
Call for Proposals: Data Collection for
Replication+Novel Political Science Survey Experiments
Alexander Coppock and Mary McGrath
January 27, 2026
We invite proposals for a survey experiment replication+novel design competition. Se-
lected replication+novel design survey experiments will be conducted on large samples of
American respondents, quota sampled to match U.S. Census margins and filtered for quality
and attention by the survey sample provider Rep Data (repdata.com).
Each proposal consists of two parts: (1) a replication study of an existing, previously
published survey experiment, and (2) a novel experimental design on a topic of the authors’
choosing.
The replication studies and reanalyses of the existing studies will be combined into a
meta-paper to be co-authored by all authors of accepted proposals along with the princi-
pal investigators (Coppock and McGrath). As a condition for acceptance, authors commit
to sharing the data and producing a write-up of the findings from their novel design for
submission to a scholarly journal, and public posting of a working paper pre-publication.
08071
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
I land somewhere between this and the OP. Evaluating the quality of the methods often requires fully understanding the research question and estimand. And that usually requires reading the intro. (Disclaimer: but even then it’s no guarantee😭 cf. www.the100.ci/2024/08/27/l... @dingdingpeng.the100.ci)
030
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
My students are in for a treat next week
020
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Dan Williams @danwphilosophy.bsky.social · 22/12/2025
A very interesting data-rich analysis of persuasion on digital media by @benmtappin.bsky.social. Recommend! open.substack.com/pub/benmtapp...
open.substack.com
For Digital Mass Persuasion, Exposure Matters More Than Persuasiveness
If you are interested in understanding the mass persuasive impact of digital media content you should generally pay more attention to content exposure than to its persuasiveness.
0154
Reposted by Ben Tappin
David Rand @dgrand.bsky.social · 04/12/2025
🚨 New in Nature+Science!🚨 AI chatbots can shift voter attitudes on candidates & policies, often by 10+pp 🔹Exps in US Canada Poland & UK 🔹More “facts”→more persuasion (not psych tricks) 🔹Increasing persuasiveness reduces "fact" accuracy 🔹Right-leaning bots=more inaccurate
216670
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Zach Dickson @zachdickson.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
🚨 New working paper 🚨 We often see populist parties like Reform UK blame higher energy bills on climate change policies. What are the political consequences of this strategy? Very early draft; comments and criticisms are welcomed! full draft: z-dickson.github.io/assets/dicks...
34817
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Public Opinion Analytics Lab (POAL) @poalab.bsky.social · 10/11/2025
"While testing one dimension at a time can yield simple results, those effects may not generalise to richer, real-world contexts." Read our new POAL Methods Briefs on Conjoint Experiments from Thomas Robinson! Link: www.poal.co.uk/research/met...
poal.co.uk
Public Opinion Analytics Lab
The website of the Public Opinion Analytics Lab
01210
Ben Tappin @benmtappin.bsky.social · 12/10/2025
Insightful long-read: "With AGI [artificial general intelligence], powerful actors will lose their incentive to invest in regular people–just as resource-rich states today neglect their citizens because their wealth comes from natural resources rather than taxing human labor." intelligence-curse.ai
intelligence-curse.ai
The Intelligence Curse
This series examines the incoming crisis of human irrelevance and provides a map towards a future where people remain the masters of their destiny.
061
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Felix M. Simon @felixsimon.bsky.social · 03/10/2025
🗞️ 🤖 Weekend reading anyone? For the launch of @transformernews.ai as a standalone publication, they invited me to contribute a piece on what persuasive AI might mean for democracy and elections. Here’s the result… buff.ly/OJsNmpK
transformernews.ai
AI is persuasive, but that’s not the real problem for democracy
Opinion: Felix M Simon argues that AI is unlikely to significantly shape election results in the near future, but warns that it could damage democracy through a steady erosion of institutional trust.
158
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Per Engzell @pengzell.bsky.social · 01/09/2025
WE ARE HIRING! 2 Lecturers in Quantitative Social Science. Want a friendly interdisciplinary department in one of the world's most vibrant cities? This just might be for you. Apply by: 10 Oct www.ucl.ac.uk/work-at-ucl/...
3149155
Reposted by Ben Tappin
Mike Masnick @masnick.com · 05/08/2025
Wrote about how the UK's online age verification requirements are already proving to be a disaster (as UK regulators were clearly warned it would be) and how unhelpful the UK's response to this mess has been, including their tech minister saying anyone who complains supports predators.
6798380