Sign in

Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco

@asandovall.bsky.social
258 followers 415 following 25 posts

Postdoctoral fellow at Autonomous Univeristy of Madrid @uam.es. Previously at METRICS @stanford.edu and University of Murcia @um.es. Interested in everything related to meta-research. sandovallentisco.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Peter Tennant @pwgtennant.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
"Is an ultra-processed chocolate cake materially more harmful than a home-made one?" I enjoyed contributing to this response to The Lancet series on ultra-processed foods, which outlines some key limitations in the evidence that 'ultra-processing' is specifically harmful to health.
link.springer.com
Public health policy should be grounded in established evidence that acknowledges uncertainty: a response to The Lancet series on ultra-processed foods - BMC Medicine
Background The recent three-part Lancet series on ultra-processed foods (UPFs) argued that the displacement of traditional diets by UPFs is a major driver of poor diet quality and diet-related chronic...
32810
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 28/09/2026
Germany has cancelled funding for the German Cochrane Foundation. Bad news all around. Cochrane’s benefit to cost ratio is huge. @cochrane.org www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/wark...
sueddeutsche.de
Bund streicht renommierter Cochrane-Stiftung die Förderung
Die Cochrane-Stiftung, die seit Jahren die Nutzen medizinischer Therapien untersucht, soll künftig nicht mehr staatlich gefördert werden.
32914
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
📊⛏️ Picanúmeros @picanumeros.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Holaaaa, he escrito un texto para @sustrato.bsky.social hablando del informe PISA, su metodología y sus limitaciones. Café para muy cafeteros. Espero que lo disfrutéis y apoyen a la buena gente de Sustrato ❤️🌱
1149
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Beth Clarke @bethclarke.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Come work on a PhD in Metascience with me! There’s just a little over one week left to apply!
02522
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Nature Human Behaviour @nathumbehav.nature.com · 21/09/2026
There is no clear target for replication rates
dlvr.it
There is no clear target for replication rates
Nature Human Behaviour, Published online: 21 September 2026; doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02602-5Is a 50% replication rate too high, too low or just right? We need a target replication rate to answer this question. Here, I evaluate two potential target rates, the ‘optimal’ replication rate and the ‘expected’ replication rate, and I call for an educational intervention to better appreciate their limitations.
011
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Adam Kucharski @adamjkucharski.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
I suspect we’ll increasing see a return to “you can only submit if you know an insider” systems, like the old-school PNAS ‘contributed’ track. It’s a bit like we’re already seeing with the new ArXiv ‘endorsement’ system...
3269
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
New preprint! 🎉 I analysed 1660 papers from 4 psychology journals and found materials sharing went from 9% of papers in 2015 to 82% in 2025, and these materials *do* get downloaded — a median of 135 times each. BUT shared code is often hard to run. doi.org/10.31234/osf... Let's walk through it 🧵
Two-panel figure. Panel a is a flow diagram tracking 1,611 empirical psychology articles from publication year (545 in 2015, 552 in 2020, 514 in 2025) to repository-link type: 785 link an OSF project, 85 link another platform, and 741 link no repository. Of those with an OSF link, download counts were retrieved for 670 and not retrieved for 115. Panel b is a line chart of the share of empirical papers linking OSF across 2015, 2020 and 2025. The overall rate, shown as a dashed black line, rises from 9% to 57% to 82%. All four journals rise steeply and end close together: Psychological Science 92%, JESP 89%, JML 83%, Cognition 76%, with Psychological Science highest throughout.Three-panel figure. Panel a: ridgeline plot of downloads per file by material type on a log scale, with the percentage never downloaded labelled for each — archive 16% of 545 files, documents 20% of 2,970, code 12% of 3,471, other 17% of 1,646, data 21% of 10,051, media 35% of 2,120, images 35% of 4,102. Most files cluster between 1 and 10 downloads, with long right tails past 100. Panel b: ridgeline plot of downloads per paper by journal, log scale, with dashed median lines; Psychological Science is highest, then JESP, JML and Cognition. Panel c: stacked bars showing, for documents, data and code separately, the share of papers by download band (0, 1–10, 11–100, more than 100) in 2015, 2020 and 2025. The share exceeding 100 downloads falls sharply over time in all three types, from roughly two-thirds in 2015 to a quarter or less in 2025, as the 1–10 band grows.Four-panel figure. Panel a: statistical languages detected among 333 papers with retrievable code — R 88%, SPSS 12%, Stata 4%, SAS 1%. Panel b: code red flags among those 333 papers — 34% hard-code an absolute path, 40% reference a missing file — above documentation among 672 OSF-linked papers — 21% have a README, 30% are documented by README, description or wiki. Panel c: among 562 Elsevier papers with no repository link, 44% (245) host at least one journal supplementary file but only 14% (77) host data, code or an archive. Panel d: composition of those 448 hosted files — documents 52%, data 21%, media 9%, other 7%, archive 6%, code 3%, images 1%. The code panels are green, the journal-supplement panels blue.Coefficient plot (download predictors)

Dot-and-whisker plot of three standardised predictors of OSF download volume, each with a 95% confidence interval. Repository size (number of files) has the largest effect at about 0.76, citations about 0.38, and altmetric attention about 0.12. All three intervals sit entirely above zero, so each predicts more downloads, with repository size roughly twice the effect of citations and six times that of attention. X-axis: standardised effect, −0.2 to 1.0.
4265113
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
maria ruz @mruz.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
We are hiring a postdoc and a predoc to do research (EEG, fMRI, MVPA, RSA) on expectation and attention at the wpd.ugr.es/~humneuro/ in beautiful Granada @cimcyc.bsky.social ! People with interest + relevant experience please reach us at mruz@ugr.es #NeuroJobs #AcademicJobs #CogNeuro #GranadaSpain
wpd.ugr.es
Human Neuroscience Lab – University of Granada
Our lab is located at the Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center. Here we have access to several behavioral testing rooms, a 3T Siemens Magnetic Resonance Imaging facility with compatible EEG and EyeLink Eyetracker, high-density EEG recording devices, and a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation device with a robotic assistant and neuronavigator.​
01919
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Jan Vanhove @janhove.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
New blog post: "Cluster analysis: A skeptic’s guide". In which I ask a few questions that social scientists wishing to identify hidden classes in their data ought to address. janhove.github.io/posts/2026-0...
A two-dimensional scatterplot showing a three-cluster solution.

Caption: "Figure 2: A visualisation of a Latent Profile Analysis fit. Such visualisations may help readers appreciate that the clusters aren’t nicely separated and that the researchers’ notion of clusters may not correspond to their own."Table of contents:

Refresher: What is cluster analysis?
What are the clusters for?
What clusters, exactly?
Does the pipeline work?
What does the solution look like?
When running follow-up analyses, how is the uncertainty in the cluster assignments taken into account?
Was it worth it?
Conclusion
References
416146
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 18/09/2026
This is an *excellent* post on cluster analysis. If you ever thought about applying cluster, latent class or latent profile analysis to psychological scales, you absolutely should read this!>
511835
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Two weeks left to sign up for the Meta-Research Symposium 2026 organized by the Paul Meehl Graduate School paulmeehlschool.github.io/2026-08-04-s... If you've attended previous years, you know this is a lovely day full of cutting edge meta-science, and a great opportunity to network.
paulmeehlschool.github.io
Registration Now Open: Meta-Research Symposium 2026 | Paul Meehl Graduate School
We are delighted to announce that registration is now open for the third Paul Meehl Graduate School Meta-Research Symposium! In...
0149
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar @asanchez-tojar.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
@shreyadimri.bsky.social et al. “Meta-analysts must lead by example and embrace all FAIR principles” We assessed meta-analyses in ecology, evolution & environmental sciences for methodological & reporting quality, data/code sharing, and data FAIRness. 🔗 doi.org/10.32942/X21...
doi.org
Meta-analysts must lead by example and embrace all FAIR principles
11711
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology @jclinepi.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
reFLASH: A proof-of-concept meta-analytic framework to validate surrogate endpoints in the absence of randomized clinical trial data - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology www.jclinepi.com/article/S089...
jclinepi.com
reFLASH: A proof-of-concept meta-analytic framework to validate surrogate endpoints in the absence of randomized clinical trial data
Within a meta-analytic framework, validating surrogate endpoints traditionally requires individual patient data (IPD) from multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This is rarely feasible in rare...
054
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Priya Silverstein @priyasilverstein.com · 08/09/2026
SIPS [@improvingpsych.org] elections are here! Don't forget to cast your ballot. If you don't already know the candidates, I would like to put a special shout out to @aliciafrancomnez.bsky.social who is running in the graduate student and postdoc category ✨
199
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Alan McElligott @amcell.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Women make up less than one-fifth of last authorships in influential journals www.nature.com/nature-index...
nature.com
Women make up less than one-fifth of last authorships in influential journals
A Nature Index analysis tracked first and last authorships to see which journals struggled to improve female representation over the past decade.
021
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
You can now update bioRxiv/medRxiv preprints with funding information after the fact. Authors often omit/don't have all funding info when submitting, but funders understandably want it there. This solves the problem without requiring you to submit a whole new paper. openrxiv.org/updating-fun...
openrxiv.org
Updating funder information on preprints - openRxiv
For the past year, bioRxiv and medRxiv authors have been able to include funder information with their preprints. This can be entered in a dedicated field during the submission process, using Research...
06428
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Yu-Fang Yang @ufangyang.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Do you work with EEG data? We are running a UC San Diego survey on the use of artificial intelligence in EEG workflows. It takes about 15 minutes, and you do not need to be a current AI user. Full details in the image. Take the survey: eegvibecoding.ucsd.edu
121
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Alex Holcombe @alexh.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
Great news! Some of us have been waiting a long time for major funders to not just shovel $ into the maws of the big publishers, and instead support the long tail of scholar-controlled journals that are run on a shoestring
05816
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Joachim Baumann @joachimbaumann.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
After Science News, our recent ICML paper also got featured in @science.org! Article: www.science.org/content/arti... Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2605.03202 @dirkhovy.bsky.social @sanmikoyejo.bsky.social #science #PeerReview #research
Screenshot of an article in Science Magazine on the opportunities and risks of AI used for peer review featuring an ICML conference paper by Joachim Baumann et al., 2026.
1104
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
simine vazire @simine.com · 02/09/2026
Psych Science has retracted Ariely & Wertenbroch (2002). The second author requested the retraction. Both authors agreed to it. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.... So grateful to @datacolada.bsky.social for these blog posts and the work behind them: datacolada.org/138 and datacolada.org/139 1/2
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
426794
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Contact Research @contactresearch.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
AI in science: slop, tool, or unlock? At the FORRT AI in Metascience conference, we'll spend three days discussing the evidence and enabling skill building. 35 talks and workshops, 28-30 Sep, online and free. Register at forrt.org/ai-metascien...
forrt.org
FORRT AI in Metascience Online Conference | FORRT
Register for the FORRT AI in Metascience Online Conference, 28–30 September 2026. Online and free to attend.
043
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Eric Schares @eschares.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
🚨Update: Our analysis of global APC expenditure has now been expanded to cover more publishers (7 -> 14) and more years (2019-2025). We estimate $15B in APCs paid over seven years, $3.7B in 2025 alone. Elsevier crosses the $1B threshold by itself in 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2608.16322 #ScholComm
Line chart showing 5 biggest publishers from 2019-2025
6179148
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Peter Tennant @pwgtennant.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
My favourite moment of @nataliaortega.bsky.social's talk was when she said you can find a nutrition meta analysis to support whatever argument you want to make about diet and health!
Picture of slide from Natalia Ortega's talk, including examples of meta analyses with contradictory conclusions.
1176
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Aki Vehtari @avehtari.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
All four books I've co-authored are freely available online for non-commercial use: - Bayesian Workflow at avehtari.github.io/Bayesian-Wor... Links to other three books are in the quoted post 👇 (too many books to fit in one post!)
avehtari.github.io
Bayesian Workflow book: Website – Bayesian Workflow book
Website for the Bayesian Workflow book by Gelman, Vehtari, McElreath, et al. — case studies, code, and exercises in R and Stan.
8283134
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
A brave and tough call to make. It's hard to overstate how influential OSF has been on science in the past ~15 years. It's been such a staple that you'd almost forget how much cost, time, and effort it must be to keep going. Kudos to the OSF team for everything they've done.
04616
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Aaron Fisher @aaronjfisher.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
Attention early career methodologists and quantitative psychologists: Berkeley Psychology is hiring! This is an assistant teaching professor position with potential for security of employment (equivalent to tenure). Please share widely! Thank you! aprecruit.berkeley.edu/JPF05480
aprecruit.berkeley.edu
Assistant Teaching Professor Quantitative Methods-Psychology
University of California, Berkeley is hiring. Apply now!
14542
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 07/08/2026
📢 Quick Reminder: Register for ReproducibiliTea 2026! The ReproducibiliTea Conference 2026 is approaching fast! Don't miss out on connecting with the global community to dive into this year's theme: "Spilling the ReproducibiliTea: A decade on & decades ahead."
189
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Matheus Gallas-Lopes @matheusglls.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
Our preprint on the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science is now available as a Reviewed Preprint in eLife. This version includes updated analyses, together with the eLife assessment. elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/111001v1
elifesciences.org
Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science
031
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Open Access Tracking Project @oatp.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy · 24/07/2026
Will making ‘replication studies’ easier to find help science self-correct? www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-…
nature.com
Will making ‘replication studies’ easier to find help science self-correct?
Nature, Published online: 16 July 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-02175-3 Project on peer-review platform Pubpeer aims to make replication studies more visible.
052
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Replication Research (R2) @r2journal.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
Our new website is now live at www.replicationresearch.org - See what is currently under review, learn more about who we are, customize article appearance, and view lay summaries, viewership stats, etc. for each article. Read more at www.replicationresearch.org/announcement....
185
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Samuel P León @samuelpleon.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
📢 Our meta-analytic and metascientific review of Montessori research is now published! We synthesized evidence from 198 studies, examining not only average effects but also methodological quality, implementation fidelity, publication bias, and open science practices. doi.org/10.3102/0034...
22517
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 23/07/2026
1. The new Trump / Kratsios plan for US science appears explicitly designed to destroy US universities. Diverting money to tech donors is probably just a bonus. Gift link.
nytimes.com
Trump’s Plan for Science: More Money for A.I., Less for Universities (Gift Article)
Michael Kratsios, President Trump’s science adviser, proposed overhauling how the government funds research. Democrats said Mr. Trump’s actions had weakened science.
5120221139
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Miguel Vadillo @mavadillo.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Very proud of SIPS commendation to @aliciafrancomnez.bsky.social 's paper with guidelines and recommendations to ECRs running their first manylabs study.
2169
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Alexander Berger @albrgr.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
New CBO paper: every $1 of federal R&D returns ~$3–$4 of GDP in present value over 30 years www.nber.org/papers/w35472
27945
Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco @asandovall.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
How often are multiverse analyses implemented, not just cited/discussed? How are they implemented? 🧵 New preprint on the uptake and implementation of multiverse-style analyses 👇 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Uptake and Implementation of Multiverse-style Analyses Across 613 Studies
Empirical conclusions can depend on the many individual choices researchers make when analyzing data. Multiverse-style analyses address this by computing results across a set of specifications rather ...
21917
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Gilad Feldman @giladfeldman.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Looking for open-science and meta-research jobs? To my surprise tracking these in the last month there are more of these than I expected. Here's where I'm tracking these: metaventory.vercel.app/jobs
021
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
There are still a few days to apply to work with me and @malte.the100.ci as a PhD or postdoc on the development and evaluation of RegCheck. Help us research whether RegCheck works in practice in helping to reduce preregistration-paper discrepancies. Apply below!
01416
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Metascience 2027 is scheduled for June 14-16 in Montreal. We are delighted to partner with the Tanenbaum Open Science Institute for this important meeting. Join the mailing list for updates at: metascience.info
metascience.info
Metascience 2027
A global gathering for knowledge sharing, community building, and opportunities to define a roadmap of research and intervention priorities to improve science.
12613
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 18/07/2026
I really like this suggestion to judge the multiverse by the quality of the worst specification:
In other words, the quality of a multiverse should generally
be judged as no higher than the quality of the worst universe included. This moves the burden of proof towards the author and — unless all universes agree — requires them to fully accept responsibility for all of the universes included. It also makes it easier, not harder to make effective criticism of a multiverse, should they be used in bad faith.
2183
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar @asanchez-tojar.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
Are our ecological conclusions built on shaky foundations? Our latest paper in @methodsinecoevol.bsky.social highlights that Risk of Bias (RoB) assessment, crucial for ensuring the internal validity of research, is almost never used in #systematicreviews in eco & evo 📉 🔗 doi.org/10.1111/2041...
14520
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
Today we launch the first stable release of RegCheck: v1.0.0. RegCheck makes it easier and quicker to compare study registrations to published papers for consistency - something we know is important in principle, but rarely done in practice. A 🧵 on what's new: regcheck.app
regcheck.app
RegCheck
RegCheck is an AI tool to compare preregistrations with papers instantly.
512883
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Nature @nature.com · 10/07/2026
Preprints don’t change much after peer review — and are rarely retracted. go.nature.com/4pebHmM
go.nature.com
Think preprints are unreliable? Analysis of 70,000 studies might change your mind
Preprints don’t change much after peer review — and are rarely retracted.
26629
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
WE ARE HIRING! Come work with us (me + @malte.the100.ci) on developing and validating RegCheck. PhD or postdoc applications welcome. Folk with backgrounds in meta-science, psychology, (pre)clinical trials, and/or economics are especially invited to apply. jobs.unibe.ch/job-vacancie...
jobs.unibe.ch
PhD Student/ Postdoc Position in Meta-Science - Universität Bern
Universität Bern is looking for PhD Student/ Postdoc Position in Meta-Science
15648
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Wolfgang Viechtbauer @wviechtb.bsky.social · 22/06/2026
The standard random-effects model in meta-analysis assumes that the amount of heterogeneity is homoscedastic. This assumption may not be true. I derived and examined various tests for heteroscedastic heterogeneity. See osf.io/cavhy for a preprint describing these methods. #MetaAnalysis #RStats
osf.io
OSF
13112
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 18/06/2026
New from our team and colleagues: ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciences arxiv.org/pdf/2602.11354
0187
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 21/06/2026
New preprint: There is only one correct analysis. osf.io/preprints/ps... with @sajedehra.bsky.social and @mntunc.bsky.social We take a critical look at recent proposals for multiverse or many analyst procedures, and strongly argue that epistemic uncertainty should be reduced, not “embraced”. >
osf.io
OSF
55823
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Gilad Feldman @giladfeldman.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
⚡ Metaventory: building better science ⚡ Had many discussions about the need for mapping out all that's meta-science: people, tools, events, jobs, simulations, etc. in one place. Metaventory aims to help connect those interested in meta-science & improving science. metaventory.vercel.app
22716
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Olmo van den Akker @denolmo.bsky.social · 05/06/2026
Big news at the META/e conference: metacheck, a promising tool for automatically extracting information from scientific manuscripts is beta-launched today. Has the potential to massively increase the efficiency of meta-science projects. www.scienceverse.org/metacheck/
scienceverse.org
Check Research Outputs for Best Practices
A modular, extendable system for checking research outputs for best practices using text search, R code, and/or (optional) LLM queries.
0136
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Juan Fernandez @juanfernandez.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
Trabajando para generar una versión en castellano del magnífico libro de @lakens.bsky.social A falta de corregir la numeración de los párrafos, ya he revisado el capítulo 2: control de errores. @samuelpleon.bsky.social @frangfr.bsky.social @mavadillo.bsky.social juangff85.github.io/inferencias-...
juangff85.github.io
3  2. Control de errores – Mejora de tus Inferencias Estadísticas
1107
Reposted by Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco
Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training @forrt.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
How can AI & LLMs improve how science works? FORRT is delighted to host the AI in Metascience online conference. Please join us! 🗓️ 28–30 Sep 2026 · online · free Talks, workshops & hackathons — all career stages welcome. 👉 Submit by 31 Jul: forrt.org/ai-metascience #Metascience #OpenScience
forrt.org
FORRT AI in Metascience Online Conference | FORRT - Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training
Call for submissions — FORRT AI in Metascience Online Conference, 28–30 September 2026, online. Deadline 31 July 2026.
02215