Reference documentation for DCAT-US v3.0, the federal metadata standard for documenting datasets, APIs, and data services. Use this reference to build or validate your agency's data inventory.

Responsible scientometrics has become a central concern in the context of increasing reliance on bibliometric indicators for research evaluation and policy decision-making. While existing frameworks such as DORA, the Leiden Manifesto, and CoARA emphasize principles of responsible metrics, less attention has been paid to the underlying data practices that condition the validity, transparency, and reproducibility of scientometric studies. This paper argues that responsible scientometrics cannot be achieved solely through improved indicators or evaluation principles; it also depends critically on the normative structuring of data practices across the entire research lifecycle. We propose a lifecycle-based framework that conceptualizes scientometric research as a sequence of interdependent data practices, including data source selection, data retrieval and acquisition, data preprocessing and standardization, data analysis and visualization, data interpretation, data storage and documentation, and data sharing and citation. For each stage, we identify common methodological risks and propose normative guidelines aimed at improving transparency, reproducibility, and contextual validity. By integrating methodological considerations with principles of responsible research assessment, the framework highlights how data practices are not merely technical procedures but constitutive elements of evaluation outcomes. The proposed framework contributes to scientometrics in three ways: (1) it systematizes scattered methodological recommendations into a coherent lifecycle model; (2) it extends responsible metrics discussions by foregrounding data-level normativity; and (3) it provides a practical reference for researchers, reviewers, and policy stakeholders engaged in research evaluation. Ultimately, this work aims to strengthen the methodological foundations of scientometrics and support more transparent, accountable, and context-sensitive evaluation systems.

Nature, Published online: 22 September 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-02818-5 A study tracking diamond open-access journals has found an increase in titles switching to other publishing models — especially over the past few years.

This article argues that, as the Canadian government and governments in peer jurisdictions adopt open access policies requiring researchers to provide free and immediate (embargo-free) public access to research publications resulting from government-funded research projects, the green road to open access (self-archiving) must remain a viable means of complying with these policies. This is essential to ensure that government open access policies do not create an unsustainable dependency on limited government resources. Although the gold road to open access offers immediate access, it often necessitates the payment of article processing fees demanded by publishers. In contrast, the green road to open access does not require payment to publishers for public access to a reliable version of the research publication (the author’s accepted manuscript); however, researchers frequently have limited authority to provide open access to their works in this manner when publishers acquire their copyrights and impose restrictions on republication. Such restrictions typically take the form of embargoes on republication, which undermine opportunities to use the green road to deliver immediate public access to research. Researchers often have weak, and sometimes nonexistent, bargaining power. Consequently, it is frequently challenging for them to navigate the publishing industry’s contractual framework that secures copyrights for free, prevents researchers from retaining the rights necessary to republish their accepted manuscripts on an open access basis, and limits their capacity to provide immediate public access to research by imposing embargoes on republication. To support the green road to open access as a viable option for researchers to provide immediate public access to research, I argue that Canada and other countries must implement, alongside their open access policies, a legislative strategy involving a secondary publication right within copyright law. This article proposes an ideal secondary publication right framework and advocates for its implementation in Canada and beyond.

Open Research Manager (Open Access and Publishing) - AD2605, Libraries and Museums Salary: Grade 6 / £38,784-£46,049 pa Start date: As soon as possible Full time Permanent , We are looking for a proactive, enthusiastic and highly skilled individual with expert knowledge of open access and scholarly publishing to join our Open Research team in Libraries & Museums at University of St Andrews. The purpose of this role is to focus on advocacy and outreach for Open Access (OA), and to manage staff and services which support the University’s open research culture. You will take responsibility for our journal hosting platform (Open Journal Systems) and our research information system (Pure) workflows for research outputs. This is an exciting time to join Libraries & Museums as we promote our open research culture which values sustainable and equitable open access. You will share our commitment to making our research outputs as widely available as possible and continue to embed our institutional OA Policy based on rights retention. We are looking for a natural leader who will take initiative to further develop our OA services. You will have excellent communication skills and the ability to solve problems with an evidence-based approach. Further information and informal enquiries may be directed to Jacqueline Proven at jep10@st-andrews.ac.uk In addition to the salary on offer for this position, there are a wide range of **benefits** for staff working at the University of St Andrews: *          Financial contribution to relocation (subject to eligibility) *          Membership of the USS Pension Scheme with generous employer contributions of 14.5% *          A hybrid working environment, including partial homeworking where appropriate and a range of family friendly policies, supporting work-life balance *          Staff discount scheme for local and national goods and services *          Free staff parking, employee Carshare and Cycle to Work Schemes and subsidised local bus travel *          Subsidised sports membership, reduced tuition fees on degree programmes for staff, access to training and development opportunities including LinkedIn Learning, access to library facilities, salary sacrifice scheme *          34 Days Annual Leave plus 5 Public Holidays. _At St Andrews, equality, diversity, and inclusion are central to who we are and form a core pillar of our University Strategy. We are committed to creating a fair, inclusive and supportive workplace, reflected in our participation in national diversity charters and awards, including Athena Swan, Carer Positive and the Race Equality Charter.  _ _We particularly welcome applications from people from Black, Asian, minority ethnic and minority religions backgrounds and from LGBTQ+ and disabled people._ _ _ **Closing date: 12 October 2026** **Interview date: 2 November 2026** **Job description:  AD2605RS FPs.pdf ** **Ref no: AD2605RS** ** ** Libraries and Museums Salary: Grade 6 / £38,784-£46,049 pa Start date: As soon as possible Full time Permanent In additi · , Working Hours : Full Time Job Family : Managerial Specialist & Administrative School/Unit : Libraries & Museums ,

Gold Open Access is literature that has an explicit open license, like CC-BY. It optionally has an article processing charge (APC). It optionally charges APC to make profit or to fund other activities, like some societies do. Green Open Access is literature that has been made available by repositories. It optionally has an open license. It optionally has a standardized license, like CC-BY. But it can also be that no clear license is given or the “license” refers to some (local) law. Many universities have green Open Access repositories, like Maastricht University and Radboud University. These repositories are scattered and contrary to FAIR principles, metadata is not shared widely. Of course, prominently, scholarly publishers could provide that information. Any paywalled journal article could have a link to a legal green open access version. It could. It would make total sense if spreading scientific knowledge is your goal. But we live in an alternate universe. We are relying on third-party indexes. I here briefly describe two options, but love to read blog posts about other alternatives! I am not looking for routes like PubMed Central or Europe PMC that come with huge collections of open-licensed content, including in the FAIR JATS format It’s really the non-OA-licensed green Open Access that we need to get indexed better. Oh, and, of course, all Dutch literature must become green Open Access. ## OpenAlex Unpaywall (see also this post) has been collecting open access versions but is now including in OpenAlex. The annotation is quite rich and here the question is more, how can the open science community enrich this OpenAlex content. ## Wikidata and WikiCite Wikidata and WikiCite are projects aligned with Wikipedia, and _[citation needed]_ is an essential part of that. We have used it in our research in multiple occassions. The curation process is transparent, providing the essential provenance needed for scientific research. It provides the work available at URL property and it has been used to link to green Open Access versions. The extend, however, is less clear (to me). But another problem is that Wikidata does not have the ambition to be a generic solution. That said, all extra links help. ## Schema.org and web search indexes? That leaves me, for now, with the role of generic web searching. Doesn’t that help? I can just search for the article title, right? Well, yes. But the process of how to get your green open access article indexed is not clear. There are many metadata standards that your repository needs to support (e.g. OpenAlex lists 8 and that does not include schema.org) and that does not guarantee you get indexed. Worse, commercial companies are know to remove content in a opague process, like with this video about the Meta gluurbril. We cannot trust that green open access metadata gets preserved. Maybe open web indexes will make a difference, but then we still need a simple API to integrate into our tools that just returns the information. I had a go at this last weekend. It would look something like this: But things go slowly, and FAIR metadata most certainly. But if we consistently take steps, things do change. For example, after 20+ years, CrossRef now supports blog as research output type. I like to stress, metadata is being shared by repositories, but we should support this a bit more. We should reuse that data, support that, curate that, etc. Let’s support our fellow open science community members! And that starts by sharing our knowledge on how all this works, does not work, could work, and what small steps we can take today and tomorrow. Looking foward to your ideas!

Open Science is evolving into a broader, more connected movement with an emerging shared vision and implementation framework that will accelerate research progress. To catalyze this convergence, the open science community is launching a new conference to bring together those working on a new research and research sharing paradigm. The

# Secondary Publishing Rights Issue **Publicly funded research faces barriers to open dissemination** * **Why it matters:** Secondary publishing rights (SPR) refer to the right (and obligation) to republish publicly funded research in an internet searchable Open Access repository or elsewhere under an open licence. This should happen simultaneously with its publication in academic journals and with guarantees around what subsequent uses can be made of the works. This aims to end the practice where the routine assignment of exclusive or extensive rights by academic authors to proprietary publishers leaves publicly funded research behind paywalls. This stands in opposition to the public policy goal of maximising the impact of research by sharing it as widely as possible in a timely manner. Too much research still remains behind paywalls, with little hope of models involving up-front payments helping. SPR offers researchers and institutions a guarantee against publishers' efforts to deprive them of their rights to share works openly. It also offers taxpayers assurance that the research they fund will be accessible and increases the body of work available to support wider research and innovation. * **Key result:** Instead of facilitating knowledge sharing, the current system leads to a situation where public institutions need to buy back access to publicly funded research, as publishers maintain control through exclusive licensing agreements and copyright transfers. This not only represents poor value-for-money for taxpayers and lost opportunities for researchers and innovators, but also creates inequalities between richer institutions (that can pay for immediate gold open access) and others. **Major challenges for authors and institutions** * **Unequal relationships with publishers:** Individuals and institutions all too often feel obliged to sign away the right to share their work openly in order to get published in so-called 'high-impact' paywalled journals. * **Legislative fragmentation:** The seven countries that have SPR provisions (and two further with secondary publishing obligations) have adopted different approaches, meaning that there is a risk of confusion when it comes to collaborative research. * **Publisher policies and restrictive contracts:** Variations in policies regarding republication and reuse in the context of Green Open Access and restrictive contract terms create frustration and complexity for researchers, libraries and research-intensive businesses. * **Embargo periods:** Even where there is secondary publication, the imposition of embargo periods creates unnecessary delays in access to publicly funded research, including urgently applicable research. * **A weakening of community-owned infrastructure:** Greater use of green open access, for example, through secondary publication rights, will strengthen the role of repositories as key infrastructures for making open science work on behalf of the community and public interest. * **Unclear downstream uses:** A lack of clarity over onward terms of use leads to readers accessing open access publications being unsure about what they can do with them, meaning that they cannot contribute fully to further research and innovation. For example, around 10% of new products and processes would not have occurred without recent academic research. In Denmark alone, the time spent dealing with research article access difficulties might be costing around EUR 72 million per year among specialist researchers. **Legal context: A patchwork of national approaches awaits harmonisation** * **Seven European countries have introduced SPR provisions with significant variations:** In addition to the already fragmented landscape depicted in the figure below, it should be noted that Italy and Spain both have introduced secondary publishing obligations with their own particularities. * **European countries exploring SPR:** In Ireland, as a result of funding to support capacity and infrastructure for open research from the National Open Research Forum (NORF), a draft Bill to introduce a parallel publishing right in Ireland is being promoted among Parliamentarians. * **Issue:** Despite the Council of the European Union's May 2023 conclusions on scholarly publishing calling on Member States and the European Commission to make immediate and unrestricted access to publicly funded research the norm, there is currently no EU initiative yet, while fragmented national approaches create legal complexity for cross-border research. Our Position 1. **The European level: Need for an EU-wide SPR legislation and a Brussels effect** * In support of the development of a true European Research Area (ERA) and given extensive efforts to promote cross-border research collaboration, the European Commission should propose legislation for a harmonised Secondary Publishing Right at least for all publicly funded research outputs, either on its own as a stand-alone or in the context of a wider package promoting research and/or open science. * SPRs should ensure: * The right/obligation to publish openly is guaranteed, regardless of the contract or transfer agreement * A zero-embargo period for maximum societal benefit * Access to the Version of Record rather than Author Accepted Manuscripts * Cover all publicly funded research, including that taking place in private institutions, from all disciplines * Extend to all types of scholarly outputs: periodicals and books, and additional materials like data, audiovisual media and charts * Clear rights for end-users who access and reuse these articles * The European Commission should recommend a secondary publishing right law for accession and European neighbourhood countries, which should be promoted in the context of cooperation with them. 2. **The National level: Country-by-country adoption and support** * All European countries, irrespective of whether an EU Member State or not, should introduce SPRs that allow the immediate republication of publicly funded articles and book chapters. * To support the effective implementation of SPRs: * There is a need for additional regulation, policy and guidance * Funding requirements can be used to back them up * Compliance should be included in wider efforts to monitor Open Access 3. **Complementary approaches: Author Rights Retention and Secondary Publishing laws** * Author Rights Retention and Secondary Publishing laws complement and work together to ensure that publicly funded academic research and scholarship can be disseminated as widely as possible. **Background** | KR21 Knowledge Briefs based on our Reports: * Secondary Publishing Rights in Europe: Status, Challenges & Opportunities # Additional Information News Reports Position Papers Knowledge Capsules ## It’s Good to Be Back (But It’s Going to Be Busy…) | Sep 7, 2026 The months between now and the end of the year are likely to be among the most intense of this mandate of the European Parliament… Read More ## Open Science in Moldova: A Regulation Worth Reinforcing with a Secondary Publication Right | Jul 17, 2026 Blog post by Mariana Harjevschi The recent adoption of the Regulation on Open Science in the Republic of Moldova marks an important milestone in the… Read More ## It Just Ain’t Right: Why Open Access Mandates Without Secondary Publication Rights Are a Recipe for Unfairness | Jun 18, 2026 It is looking increasingly likely that a secondary publication right (SPR) will feature on the European Union’s legislative agenda in the coming years. Having been… Read More ## Rome Conference Charts the Road Ahead for Open Science under the European Research Area Act | Jun 16, 2026 Blog post by Deborah De Angelis On 10 June 2026, the conference “Open Science through the Prism of the European Research Area (ERA) Act: The Work… Read More ## The ERA Act, Open Science and the Freedom to Stay | Mar 31, 2026 As the launch of the European Commission’s proposals for the European Research Area (ERA) Act get closer, there is growing interest in how it will… Read More ## The Open Risk Facing UK Universities: A Lack of AI Sovereignty | Mar 27, 2026 Blog post by Benjamin White Originally published in a shortened version on 11 March 2026 by Research Professional News Universities make a uniquely important contribution to the UK’s… Read More ## Cyprus Workshop Report: The Secondary Publication Right | Mar 24, 2026 Blog post by Giorgos Glossiotis On Monday, 16 March 2026, KR21 organised a workshop, with the support of the Cyprus Association of Librarians – Information… Read More ## Portuguese Civil Society Proposes Secondary Publication Rights and Obligation | Mar 20, 2026 Blog post by Eduardo Leonardo dos Santos Portuguese translation available here On 5 February, the magnificent Great Hall of the prestigious Academy of Sciences of… Read More ## Scientific Information in Greece: A KR21 Supported Report Pushing for More Open & Accessible Research | Nov 20, 2025 Blog post by Giorgos Glossiotis In a new report supported by Knowledge Rights 21 entitled ‘Legal Aspects of Access to and Reuse of Scientific Information in Greece’,… Read More ## PUBMET2025: KR21 at the 12th Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science | Oct 24, 2025 On 8 October 2025, the European Commission launched two key AI documents:Blog post by Iva Melinščak Zlodi The 12th PUBMET Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of… Read More ## 2025 International Open Access Week: Join Us in Supporting SPARC Europe’s #OA100 Campaign | Oct 20, 2025 20-26 October marks International Open Access Week 2025, organised by SPARC in partnership with the Open Access Week Advisory Committee. This year’s theme, “Who Owns… Read More ## Breaking Down Barriers to Knowledge: Finnish Study Reveals Copyright Challenges in Scientific Research & Publishing | Sep 26, 2025 Blog post by Pirjo Kangas Momentum is building towards the European Research Area (ERA) Act, with a recent call for evidence and the draft act due to be… Read More

The Connecting the Opens leadership series explores how university leaders across Europe are connecting Open Science and Open Education in their institutions. Based on interviews conducted by SPARC Europe, the series can inspire more leaders to “connect the opens”. It seeks to empower higher education institutions to address complex challenges through an integrated open knowledge framework. There are six items in the series: The first item focuses on some of the visions and goals that come from university leaders who already connect the opens. A list of key action points wraps up this item. The second item explores the key drivers that are accelerating the shift toward openness in higher education. We examine the interconnected forces shaping this transition: from accessibility, innovation, and economic considerations to policy mandates and broader societal change. By mapping these drivers, the item aims to support stakeholders in understanding not only why openness is advancing, but how these pressures are reshaping the future role of universities. The third item explores the challenges that arise when turning a vision of openness into practice in higher education environments. It highlights issues such as incentives, commercialisation, ensuring policy coherence, building infrastructure, and developing digital skills. This piece also emphasises that strategic action can help institutions move toward more accessible and socially engaged knowledge systems. The fourth item explores how institutions are turning their vision of openness into concrete strategies to embed it across research and education. It highlights how universities are bringing together open science and open education, aligning governance, incentives and infrastructure, and strengthening collaboration both within institutions and with wider society. It also shows a broader shift from fragmented initiatives to more coordinated, system-wide approaches, where leadership, community engagement and flexible implementation pathways are key to building more connected, participatory and sustainable open knowledge systems. The fifth item explores how evolving policy approaches and incentive structures are helping institutions connect open science and open education within integrated open knowledge frameworks. It highlights emerging strategies for developing context-aware policies, aligning institutional and international frameworks, and creating supportive environments that encourage the creation, sharing, and reuse of knowledge. The item also examines how incentives, recognition systems, and cultural change can foster greater engagement with open practices among researchers, educators and institutions, contributing to more accessible, equitable, and impactful higher education systems. The sixth item explores how senior leaders translate advocacy into strategic action to embed openness as a core institutional value. It highlights how leadership shapes governance, secures budgets for capacity building, and coordinates efforts across libraries, IT, and research support. Finally, it examines how leaders drive cultural change by rewarding open practices in career progression, supporting grassroots communities, and positioning their institutions within global open ecosystems.

Maury et al. introduce MAKAAO, an open, FAIR-compliant database linking human autoantibodies to their targets, associated diseases, and laboratory tests. Manually curated from the literature, the resource also welcomes contributions from the autoimmune disease community.

A conference on the future of scientific publishing

Starting in 2027, the SNSF will cap publication fees for articles and adjust its funding for books.

Comments

A working group appointed by Universities Norway (UHR) was mandated to recommend guiding principles for the assessment and evaluation of research(ers) in light of the transition to Open Science. This working group proposes a more flexible and holistic framework for recognition and rewards in academic research assessment.

# Connecting the Opens: The Leadership series 31st August 2026News, Open Access, Open Education, Open Science European higher education has never been more open – and yet, its various open initiatives are often pursued in isolation, each falling short of its full potential. Across six instalments, SPARC Europe’s Connecting the Opens leadership series has presented a clear strategic proposition: Open Science, Open Education, Open Access and other Opens should not be managed as separate agendas. Connecting them can create synergies that strengthen impact, equity, and efficiency, resulting in a more robust and equitable higher education ecosystem. The series stems from SPARC Europe’s Connecting the Opens programme, which sets out to broaden the open agenda by making the case for European public universities to connect open science, open education, and other opens. As part of this effort, in 2024 and 2025 we interviewed rectors, chancellors, library directors, deans, and other institutional leaders from across Europe who are driving the Open agenda forward, seeking to better understand how these various “Opens” can be connected in practice. We shared leadership thoughts through a position paper and a series of items. We laid the groundwork for the series with a position paper that provides the context and reasoning behind the core themes explored in the items that followed. In it, the connected opens are described as rooted in open education and open source traditions, building inclusive, value-driven communities that encourage sharing, interdisciplinarity, and ethical scholarship. The connected opens break down the silos of open initiatives both within and across institutions. A series of items then went on to address key aspects to connecting the opens, including the vision, drivers of openness, challenges, strategies, policies and incentives, and the role of senior leadership. The series began by framing the strategic vision: repositioning the university from an isolated institution into an active node within a global knowledge network, where open is not just a vision for ensuring equitable access to knowledge and education for all, but a mindset and a catalyst for cultural change. It then examined the drivers of openness – accessibility, innovation, policy mandates, and funding pressures – establishing that the business case for openness extends well beyond cost reduction alone. Naming the challenges in pursuing the connected opens was presented as the first step toward addressing them: commercial structures within scholarly communication, misaligned academic incentives and reward systems, and gaps in institutional infrastructure and capacity are common issues. The series then set out institutional strategies, demonstrating how leading universities are consolidating fragmented initiatives into coherent “open by design” frameworks, built on infrastructure, skills, reward and recognition, governance, and active student co-creation. The fifth item addressed policies and incentives, outlining how frameworks such as CoARA and career-linked rewards are being used to align individual motivations with institutional and societal goals. The series closed by examining the role of senior leadership, arguing that leadership engagement must go to active participation in embedding openness within institutional strategies, governance structures, and policy frameworks. Each item closed with a set of actionable points, offering leadership teams concrete guidance on the path to connecting the opens. Together, these six items constitute a strategic roadmap, positioning the opens not as a matter of efficiency or compliance, but as a deliberate strategy for the modern university. ### Looking ahead Our forthcoming Case Studies series will show what connecting the opens looks like in practice and how institutions are turning vision into action, with concrete approaches and results. You can find the full series in our Hub for Connecting the Opens. We invite you to sign up for our mailing list and follow SPARC Europe and #ConnectingTheOpens on social media to know more. Tags: connecting the opens, leadership, open access, open education, open science

This guidelines document is designed to support Diamond Open Access (OA) journal publishers to enhance the quality and credibility of their journals, and to encourage alignment with established best practices in scholarly publishing. It builds upon established frameworks, including the DOAJ’s Basic Criteria, the Best Practices Checklist for Diamond OA Publishers, and the Diamond Open Access Standard (DOAS) developed by the Developing Institutional Open Access Publishing Models To Advance Scholarly Communication (DIAMAS) project, taking into account the specific challenges faced by Diamond OA journals in Africa and aiming to provide practical, adaptable solutions. The document includes: Essential elements of Diamond OA journals Journal Policies Template, as well as Author Statement, Conflict of Interest and Licence Agreement templates Technical guidelines: elements to include in article landing pages and the full-text of the article, displaying licensing information, general advice regarding journal websites and accessibility. Slovenian (https://www.eifl.net/sites/default/files/resources/202510/slo_quality_in_diamond_oa_publishing.pdf) and Serbian (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17653271) translations of the guide are available. This resource is part of Good Practice in Action: A Toolkit for Diamond OA Journals (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22894228).

Presented as part of a plenary panel on librarians’ perspectives on research data management for community-engaged research, this brief presentation highlights institutional repositories as an important option for sharing and digitally preserving community-engaged research outputs, alongside data repositories for sharing and preserving research data. It also acknowledges the need to increase awareness of these services and ensure they are responsive to the needs of communities and researchers engaged in this work.

OONI Explorer is an open data resource on Internet censorship around the world consisting of more than a billion measurements on network interference.

Join AAC&U and the Open Education Association for a conversation about new research on OER as High-Impact Practice in to action

Think of open research as an overarching commitment to transparency, running through every stage of the process, rather than options to be ticked off. Here’s how

Comments

DOAJ is supported by a diverse community of organisations that recognise the importance of trusted, open infrastructure for scholarly communication. Our work depends on sustained investment in our people, systems and infrastructure. We are therefore very grateful to the publishers and data users who choose to support DOAJ and contribute to the costs of maintaining and developing the service. Publishers that support DOAJ help sustain an infrastructure that provides quality assurance, visibility, and discoverability for open access journals around the world. Our editorial team assesses nearly 9,000 new applications each year, alongside ongoing quality checks and investigations into suspected bad practice. This work helps maintain trust in the journals included in DOAJ and supports the wider community in identifying trusted open access publishing. DOAJ’s curated journal and article metadata is also used by discovery services, commercial tools and other scholarly infrastructures around the world. The organisations that use DOAJ data play an important role in making open access research more visible and discoverable, and we are grateful to those that also contribute to sustaining the infrastructure behind the data. #### Thank you to our supporters We would like to thank all our publisher and data user supporters for contributing to DOAJ’s sustainability. ###### Publisher Supporters American Chemical Society American Psychological Association AOSIS Cambridge University Press Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP Cogitatio Press COPERNICUS GMBH eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd Elsevier B.V. Emerald Publishing Érudit Frontiers Media SA Georg Thieme Verlag KG Gruppo Italiano Frattura (IGF) IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Institute of Physics / IOP Publishing John Wiley and Sons LTD KEAI – Guest Marketing Service Ltd MDPI AG Pensoft Publishers Peytchinski Publishing Ltd. Public Library of Science (PLOS) Royal Society of Chemistry S Karger AG Sage Publications Scandinavian University Press / Aschehoug AS SciELO Springer Nature Ltd Taylor & Francis Group Ltd The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) Tsinghua University Press Zhejiang University Press Co., Ltd. ###### Data Users 4strat GmbH – Strategic Foresight & Trendforschung EBSCO International Inc. Digital Science (Figshare, Symplectic) Drillbit SoftTech India Pvt Ltd / Drillbit Plagiarism EBSCO International Inc. Open Journals Collective (OJC) OurResearch (Impactstory) Publishers Licensing Services (PLS) SirsiDynix (Cloudsource and Search) STM Services B.V. Subscription People ApS Tepsivo Oy #### **Supporting DOAJ in 2027** We will soon start our fundraising cycle for 2027, and we are pleased to expand the ways organisations can support DOAJ. For **data users** , we are introducing our **Premium Metadata Service** , providing access to up-to-date DOAJ metadata for use in your own systems and services. For **publisher supporters** , we are adding new benefits to the supporter package, including a **quarterly publisher supporter newsletter** , with news and developments from DOAJ, and access to our **Premium Metadata Service**. If your organisation is interested in supporting DOAJ through either scheme in 2027, please get in touch (supporters@doaj.org). We would be happy to discuss the options and how your support can contribute to DOAJ’s sustainability.

Search selected counties from the 1940 U.S. census and view the original National Archives scans. Free, open data; coverage is growing.

Join us for our half-day event focused on bringing FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) practices to everyday medical research.

This study aimed to evaluate the motivations and concerns related to preprint use among Brazilian health researchers. A mixed-methods online survey of all 1,596 holders of CNPq Research Productivity Grants in seven health fields was conducted in 2025. The questionnaire was adapted from a survey of bioRxiv authors, translated into Portuguese, and pilot-tested. Closed-ended responses were analyzed descriptively, and free-text responses were grouped by similarity. Overall, 178 researchers accessed the survey (11.2%), and 143 answered items on preprints and were included in the final analysis (9.0% effective response rate). The mean age was 55.9 years, and 88.0% were affiliated with public institutions. Regarding corresponding-author publications over the previous five years, 62.2% of respondents had deposited no preprints, while 37.8% had deposited at least one. Among preprints users, 79.2% agreed that deposition was freely decided by the authors. The main motivations were rapid sharing of findings (69.8%) and obtaining feedback (49.1%). Few reported benefits in terms of citations (17.3%) or online dissemination (16.9%). Among those who had not deposited preprints, the main reason was not wanting to deposit them (57.6%), followed by being unaware of the option (35.3%). Of the 22 free-text responses, 19 reflected an informed decision not to deposit, most commonly because peer review was considered necessary before public dissemination. Preprint use was limited mainly by a lack of intention to deposit rather than a lack of awareness. Faster dissemination and feedback were the main motivations for using preprints. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Ethics committee of Atitus University gave ethical approval for this work under review number 6.930.655. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes The data are available on the Open Science Framework platform (). Fundaçäo de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, https://ror.org/05k49za97

The objective of the publication is to provide an up-todate account of open access policies in all EU Member States and select third countries (e.g. UK, USA, China, Japan). The added value is that the up-to-date account will provide the Commission and external readers with current and accurate knowledge of an important component of open science, that is open access to scientific publications, In addition, the intelligence from the report is fed into the work carried out in view of the European Research Area Act proposal. The publication addresses an aspect of research in Europe.

This year has marked an important moment for Open Research Information in the Netherlands with a new wave of initiatives is turning long-standing ambitions around openness, interoperability, and digital sovereignty into concrete implementation.

Introduction: Green Open Access requires authors to submit appropriate versions of journal articles to a repository; the challenge for researchers is to remember to perform this task after the primary work of the publication process is done. This case study at Brock University Library shows how it is possible to bootstrap these types of submissions by crafting meaningful publishing narratives through a collection of clever Open Access Week initiatives. Literature Review: The literature review assesses the existing scholarly material on Open Access outreach efforts and touches on Open Access in the Canadian context. It explores the dynamics of self-archiving with Green Open Access and the use of institutional repositories. The existing literature on wielding open data as a tool to serve libraries is discussed, and the potential of these tools to support librarian advocacy work is examined. Description of Program and Benefits: By using a collection of Open Access scholarly publishing web services and APIs, two outreach campaigns were conducted by Brock University Library during Open Access Week 2025. The first was a State of Scholarly Publishing Report that showed broad trends in output from the organization, and the second was a Green Open Access Call to Action that prompted researchers to submit recently published eligible papers to the repository. Conclusion: There was enough enthusiasm generated from these two projects that the Brock University Library will continue to run these campaigns in subsequent Open Access Weeks. The publishing report was engaging and was included in many different venues on campus, while the Green Open Access Call to Action resulted in submissions from 37% of contacted authors.