Reposted by WhatismooSasho Todorov @sashotodorov.bsky.social · 26/09/2026For context: Palantir isn't named that because he's a Tolkien fan. It's because he's a fan of the uber-reddit Russian fanfic "The Last Ringbearer" which recast Sauron as a progressive industrializing force. 1734389
Reposted by Whatismoo🎃GHOULLIKEHELLMACHINE🎃 @golikehellmachine.com · 09/10/2026someone needs to put skarsgard and pattinson together into the weirdest fucking buddy cop movie you’ve ever seen 1321310
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 13/10/2026A balk os when they walk you after throwing balls, duh 000
Reposted by WhatismooWesley Morgan @wesleymorgan.bsky.social · 13/10/2026Here’s LL Cool J trying to explain Clausewitz’s “remarkable trinity” to an uncomprehending Joe Rogan 1102531486
Reposted by WhatismooB. A. Friedman @bafriedman.bsky.social · 06/10/2026US: Wait, CENTCOM is a maritime theater? Royal Navy:static.klipy.comAlways Has Been Among Us MemeALT: Always Has Been Among Us Meme 510313
Reposted by WhatismooMike Black @mikeblack114.bsky.social · 06/10/2026as always have to align to the operational problem XVIII has jack and shit to do with any WestPac contingency lol the good news is neither do the carriers 🙃 3532
Reposted by WhatismooJournal of Slavic Military Studies @josms.bsky.social · 23/09/2026Some say reading is dead… but perhaps not quite yet… 121
Reposted by WhatismooJournal of Slavic Military Studies @josms.bsky.social · 23/09/2026Finally, Lester Grau and Charles Bartles author The Russian Way of War: History, Force Structure, and Tactics of the Russian Airborne Troops out from General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces, with Roger N. McDermott reviewing doi.org/10.1080/1351...doi.orgGrau and Bartles, The Russian Way of War: History, Force Structure, and Tactics of the Russian Airborne TroopsPublished in The Journal of Slavic Military Studies (Vol. 39, No. 3, 2026) 052
Reposted by WhatismooJournal of Slavic Military Studies @josms.bsky.social · 22/09/2026Alexander Hill reflects on the war in "Understanding Russia’s ‘Special Military Operation’ through a longer-term historical-cultural lens of the history of the Soviet Union and Imperial Russia – some developing thoughts” doi.org/10.1080/1351...doi.orgUnderstanding Russia’s ‘Special Military Operation’ through a longer-term historical-cultural lens of the history of the Soviet Union and Imperial Russia – some developing thoughts1This article looks at Russia’s ‘Special Military Operation’ in Ukraine through what the author would describe as a ‘historical-cultural’ lens - one that not only considers elements that would typic... 132
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 23/09/2026Oooh. I can think of an interesting counterpoint about his nuclear signaling 000
Reposted by WhatismooJournal of Slavic Military Studies @josms.bsky.social · 22/09/2026Volume 39 Issue 3 for 2027 is out… so check it out all these articles here www.tandfonline.com/toc/fslv20/3... If they aren’t open access… reach out to authors and ask for a pre-print copy. I’m sure they’d oblige.tandfonline.comThe Journal of Slavic Military StudiesVolume 39, Issue 3 of The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 142
Reposted by WhatismooSecretary of Defense Rock @sodrock.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Between the killing of DTIC and now CASI, DOD really trying to kill any and all scholarship on war, I’m sure that’ll work out smartly! 2238965
Reposted by WhatismooDavid Alman @davidalman.bsky.social · 21/09/2026Literal decades of damage to United States national security. There are kids now who would have gone to do ROTC or joined the IC. They won't be there in thirty years as senior officers or analysts. Think about what leadership looks like then if only populated by those who joined now... 924555
Reposted by WhatismooDr Emma Salisbury @salisbot.bsky.social · 21/09/2026"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle." 2678
Reposted by WhatismooB. A. Friedman @bafriedman.bsky.social · 21/09/2026This is awful. CASI does excellent work and put on the best PLA course in DC. 916833
Reposted by WhatismooElizabeth Sandifer @eruditorumpress.com · 15/09/2026The problem is that "while you weren't looking the tech industry was comprehensively taken over by a cult based around a piece of Harry Potter fanfic" is self-evidently an absolutely ridiculous claim that can't possibly have happened, which is a real problem given that it 100% did happen. 4429431012
Reposted by WhatismooAdam Becker @adambecker.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Nice to see this getting some attention. It's completely true, and I dearly wish more journalists understood where these common narratives about AI actually come from. 10816225
Reposted by WhatismooLouis @louisevans.bsky.social · 17/09/2026HALLUCINATED COMMUNITIES, by benedict ainderson 38722
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 17/09/2026What is the ganging gadgetbahn then? In contrast to running a train. 140
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 17/09/2026Not calling you a trad cath, just it's all exhausting obscure politics which I déteste about institutions I am not a fan of and ideolgies I wish not to have to care about. 140
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 17/09/2026This is like when thr trad caths I know talk about vatican intrigues. 150
Reposted by WhatismooThe Slides @theslides.bsky.social · 17/09/2026"US Navy 35mm presentation slides," slide 11 of 20 [gallery] 0163
Reposted by WhatismooPeter Sagal @petersagal.bsky.social · 17/09/2026If you want more, there’s this four part documentary hosted by a quasi-game show host from about a decade ago. www.pbs.org/tpt/constitu...pbs.orgWatch CONSTITUTION USA with Peter Sagal | PBSHit the road with Peter Sagal in CONSTITUTION USA as he travels cross country to find out where the Constitution lives, how it works, and how it unites us. 4587
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 17/09/2026Well X-47 was in the X sequence. The next Q sequence is in thr 40s AFAIK. 110
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Q series and F series are different numbering schemes! 150
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Please NAVAR and Pentagon. Bring back the ≈73-78 plane alpha strike. 040
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Also the USAF could make good use of it. But you'd have to to through the navy and parochialism blows. 140
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Option A 24 "MQ-47C" 24 F/A-XX 24 F-35C 6 MQ-25 11 H-60/V-75 3 CMV-22 5 E-2D Option B 12 "MQ-47C" 24 F/A-XX 24 F-35C 6 MQ-25 7 EF-18G/EF-35/VAQ!F/A-XX 11 H-60/V-75 3 CMV-22 5 E-2D 290
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 16/09/2026I want to put a VAU on every CVN in addition to 48-55 strike fighters, and X-47B is roughly sized to do that. 1101
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 16/09/2026This is kinda why ACE (and predecessor dispersal concepts) existed tbh. It would be kind of sick if we could have a USAF cheap terminal interceptor for defending dispersed sites, like Ameri-SA-27 on a truck. 050
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Someone should cover these woth a real band so I feel less like a scumbag listening to them 030
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 15/09/2026Put it another way, killing ± 6.5 billion people (the world population in the mid 2000s) only knocks the population back to the global population in the mid-1920s 020
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 15/09/2026On top of that, nuclear winter and similar medium term post attack effects studies done back in the day were based on some questionable assumptions about fuel loading and firestorms. Those scenarios seem less likely as building codes have modernized and we have gotten better at climate science. 120
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 15/09/2026Using the 12k number, you've got just under 3 nuclear weapons for every city and town on earth over 100,000 inhabitants. But that only accounts for 2 billion people or so, and the numbers are a bit outdated (there are more cities over 100k now, the data is from 2022). 120
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 15/09/2026I would struggle to see how you could weaponeer your way to enough to end humanity with even 15,000 weapons (current stockpiles are like... 12k, and ±2500 of those are launchable), and the limits of deliveru systems. There is a big margin between killing half or 2/3 or 75% of people and everyone! 130
Reposted by WhatismooFaine Greenwood @faineg.com · 15/09/2026The core theme of our moment could be boiled down to “obvious lunatics unexpectedly being taken seriously.” 723834
Whatismoo @whatismoo.bsky.social · 15/09/2026Even a general nuclear exchange wouldn't end humanity, though it would be very unpleasant. Nuclear weapons are destructive, but they're not magic. 160
Reposted by WhatismooRick Herrera @herreramilhist.bsky.social · 14/09/2026Resources for historians of slavery and the slave trade. 061
Reposted by WhatismooSMH Historians @smh-historians.bsky.social · 20/08/2026The Board of Trustees of the Society for Military History has approved the following statement of protest regarding the recent closure of public access to the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 210941
Reposted by WhatismooDr. Samantha Hancox-Li @sjshancoxli.liberalcurrents.com · 08/09/2026as someone who has read far too much military history i think this is as wrong as can be. america did not send warriors to win world war two. we sent shopkeepers, and farmers, and accountants, and millions of ordinary people who did not dream of glory and death. and we won. 281052136
Reposted by WhatismooStephen England @stephenengland.bsky.social · 08/09/2026You could argue that the majority of America's wars have been won by very boring people applying civilian skills to the mass logistics of armed conflict. 1582