Reposted by Stefanie HausteinLukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 18/09/2026I just published my German Open Science book with @uni-muenster.de's library. It contains most of what I know about open science, can be understood by undergraduates, and is free. - published PDF: www.uni-muenster.de/Ebooks/index... - Quarto version: lukasroeseler.github.io/openscienceb... 12613
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 17/09/2026just pinging that you probably meant 12,540 unique journals instead of 2,540 110
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinEric Schares @eschares.bsky.social · 31/08/2026This analysis combined OpenAlex journal-year article counts with an accompanying APC dataset that's free and open for your reuse. Tracking 2,540 unique journals across 14 publishers and seven years, for 69,856 journal-year combinations. doi.org/10.7910/DVN/...doi.org 2135
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinEric Schares @eschares.bsky.social · 31/08/2026We include graphs to break down patterns by publisher, OA type, and year, and again look at APCs listed/offered vs. APCs chosen/paid. 1137
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinEric Schares @eschares.bsky.social · 31/08/2026🚨Update: Our analysis of global APC expenditure has now been expanded to cover more publishers (7 -> 14) and more years (2019-2025). We estimate $15B in APCs paid over seven years, $3.7B in 2025 alone. Elsevier crosses the $1B threshold by itself in 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2608.16322 #ScholComm 6179148
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinLeiden Madtrics @leidenmadtrics.bsky.social · 24/03/2026🌐 In our new blog post, Juan Pablo Bascur introduces the ORION Dashboard: a tool that makes #openresearchdata accessible, interactive, and easy to explore 👩💻. 🔎 Discover the blog post here 👉 www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/ori...leidenmadtrics.nlORION dashboard: bringing open research data within reachThe ORION dashboard enables easy exploration of CWTS OpenAlex data on BigQuery, letting users analyse institutions, funders, and research topics via interactive visualisations and reproducible SQL que... 065
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinJoseph Cox @josephcox.bsky.social · 10/03/2026I have literally watched something like 5 hours of this DOGE bro testimony. I'm completely obsessed, it's weirdly captivating. The circular arguments, the disdain from everyone involved, a true pleasure to watch Follow 404 Media on Instagram (www.instagram.com/404mediaco/) for more like this 69618165
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinRichard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 10/03/2026"Funders serious about timely, open, and equitable access to research must explicitly recognize preprint sharing as a route to Open Access compliance" I know I'm a broken record on this but it seems so blindingly obvious... #PlanU journals.plos.org/plosbiology/... council.science/blog/open-sc...council.scienceOpen Science round-up: Making preprints count - International Science CouncilIn this issue, we feature an editorial by the International Network for Advancing Science and Policy (INASP) on how funders and policy-makers can support a faster, more equitable publishing system by ... 02115
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinLucyCes @lucyces.bsky.social · 06/03/2026If you enjoyed the first edition, get ready for the 2nd Canadian Open Science Conference!!🍁 #savethedate : 27-29 October, @uottawa.ca more info and CfA coming soon ! sign up for the mailing list, you don't want to miss it 💫 #AcademicSky #OpenScience #ScholComm @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.cacarn-recar.ca2nd Canadian Open Science Conference – Canadian Reproducibility Network 064
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinMetaROR @metaror.bsky.social · 02/03/2026🔓 Our latest article presents an analysis of bronze open access publications in the Web of Science database. Reviewers did not identify major weaknesses, calling it solid, timely & sound, and suggested expanding the discussion on the concept of bronze OA. 👇 Read the full evaluation now on MetaRORmetaror.orgThe State of Bronze Open Access in Web of Science - MetaROR 112
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinPLOS Biology @plosbiology.org · 27/02/2026In support of #OpenScience, we routinely ask authors to openly share their #research #code before publication. We are now formalizing this practice with a mandatory #CodeSharing policy and clarifying what we mean by code sharing.plos.ioFormalizing our commitment to code sharingIn support of open science, PLOS Biology routinely asks authors to openly share their research code before publication. We are now formalizing this practice with a mandatory code sharing policy and… 05125
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinDalmeet Singh Chawla @dalmeet.bsky.social · 25/02/2026Can temporary pop-up journals (designed to answer one specific research question) become popular among researchers? My latest for @nature.com: www.nature.com/articles/d41... @mattsclancy.bsky.social, @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.canature.comPop-up journals for policy research: can temporary titles deliver answers?Journals that focus on specific research questions could help to bridge the science–policy gap, if they can attract researchers. 122
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 16/02/2026This is so helpful, thank you! Would the export include all grants that were active in a given fiscal year or only the new ones awarded? So if I had 2025 FY, would that only have grants first awarded then or also those awarded pre-2025? 000
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinKompetenznetzwerk Bibliometrie/Geschäftsstelle @bibliometrie-info.bsky.social · 12/02/2026Last year, the KB presented the initial OPENBIB data release, which contains selected and curated metadata from OpenAlex. See this new blog post tinyurl.com/58zmb79z for an updated data release based on the OAL snapshot from July 25. This data release also features a KB author disambiguation system. 054
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinDorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 11/02/2026V useful piece dispelling myths about NIH policy on open access upstream.force11.org/cost-of-conf...upstream.force11.orgThe Cost of Confusion: Dispelling Myths about the NIH Public Access Policy and Article Processing ChargesLast July, the NIH issued an RFI on limiting direct spending on article processing charges (APCs). Over 900 public responses offered valuable perspectives but also exposed widespread misconceptions ab... 01613
Reposted by Stefanie Haustein𝖳𝗁𝖾𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺𝖭𝖾𝗐𝗌 @themeta.news · 09/02/2026🟢 Trump secoue les publis Intimidations, voire fermeture de certaines revues, coupure d’abonnements, volonté de limiter les frais de publication... On fait le bilan d'un an de Donald Trump au pouvoir themeta.news/ledition-sci... #VeilleESR @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca 154
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinSamuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 04/02/2026"By far the most common misconception appearing in the RFI responses is that NIH public access policy has essentially forced researchers into a "pay-to-play" system" Christopher Steven Marcum and Corinna Turbes on some of the misconceptions about the NIH Public Access Policy.upstream.force11.orgThe Cost of Confusion: Dispelling Myths about the NIH Public Access Policy and Article Processing ChargesLast July, the NIH issued an RFI on limiting direct spending on article processing charges (APCs). Over 900 public responses offered valuable perspectives but also exposed widespread misconceptions ab... 193
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinSamuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 04/02/2026"Relx, which is the 16th largest company in the FTSE 100 index, lost just over £6 billion from its stock market value after Anthropic launched a new AI product that can help automate work for the legal industry." archive.ph/ya78Varchive.ph 223
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinMark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 02/02/2026All set for New Horizons 💎 #OpenAccess in Nijmegen! Thank you to the organisers for the opportunity to speak on the Strain, Stain, & Drain of scientific publishing. Looking forward to great conversations on moving #ScientificPublishing forward! bit.ly/StrainQSS www.horizondiamond.nl#schedule 3145
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinMartin Paul Eve @eve.gd · 29/01/2026OK, day off, but I wanted to share this: codeberg.org/gbilder/inst... "Instead" is an intriguing proposal by the super-smart @gbilder.com to give AI bots a pointer to a prepackaged downloadable static version of a site. Bear with me, as I know this sounds bad at first glance.codeberg.orginsteadOld draft idea for encouraging AI bots to behave when scraping open infrastructure 223
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinVincent Traag @vtraag.bsky.social · 27/01/2026📣 Our introduction to structural causal models in science studies is now published: doi.org/10.1162/QSS.... @tklebel.bsky.social and I tried to make our introduction as accessible as possible. We illustrate the theory by three case studies based on a simulated model of Open Science. 🧵(1/6) 29439
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinHeinz Pampel @pampel.bsky.social · 28/01/2026New resource: a practical guide to publication and cost monitoring through institutional #OpenAccess repositories. English summary: doi.org/10.59350/rhe... #OpenScience @ibi-hu.bsky.social, @humboldtuni.bsky.social 0135
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinDanny Kingsley @dannykay68.bsky.social · 28/01/2026NOR US! Another three UK universities decline new Elsevier deal www.timeshighereducation.com/news/three-m... - Sheffield, Lancaster and Surrey confirm they are walking away from proposed three-year deal with world’s largest academic publisher. (paywalled sorry)timeshighereducation.comAnother three UK universities decline new Elsevier dealSheffield, Lancaster and Surrey confirm they are walking away from proposed three-year deal with world’s largest academic publisher 0127
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinElisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 25/01/2026Thousands of scientists inflate their CVs with self-published studies that cost millions of dollars of public money 1 in 8 'special issues' is filled with articles written by the editor, particularly at the publisher MDPI @manuelansede.bsky.social english.elpais.com/science-tech...english.elpais.comThousands of scientists inflate their CVs with self-published studies that cost millions of dollars of public moneyAn analysis of 100,000 special issues of academic journals reveals that one in eight is filled with articles written by the editor, particularly at the publisher MDPI 67736
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinSamuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 22/01/2026“We have to find significant non-pay budget savings so this was the obvious place to start,” www.timeshighereducation.com/news/three-m...timeshighereducation.comThree major research universities opt out of new Elsevier dealComplaints over ‘price increases’ and open access models spur UK institutions to walk away from offer from publishing giant, despite nationally negotiated agreement 174
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinRoss Mounce @rmounce.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 22/01/2026Given all the news about ICE in the past few weeks, can I kindly remind you all that RELX (owners of Elsevier & LexisNexis) is "mission-critical" to ICE. ICE pays RELX Group and Thomson Reuters millions of dollars for the personal data it needs to fuel its big data policing program […]mastodon.socialOriginal post on mastodon.social 13161
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinJuan Pablo Alperin @juancommander.scholcommlab.ca · 16/01/2026@cometadata.bsky.social has been demonstrating it's possible to do big things! Matched over ~400K preprints 1/ ~2 MILLION authors to RORs—now in an openly available dataset. Come learn what we've been up to, what's next, and how to get involved. Next community call next week. Details below. 085
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 14/01/2026Deutschlandfunk is legit reporting and it’s definitely a great contribution. My only critique is that they did fall for SN’s BS about “real” profit margins being way smaller.. still a good piece about the drain et al 210
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 10/01/2026Yeah, that was my thinking: AI is just a symptom of larger underlying issues. Publish or perish has been pushing LLM short cuts etc.. AI (similar to the internet before) isn’t the root cause of all evil, it’s just amplifying the issues.. 000
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 08/01/2026🤔 I guess you’re right. But lots of enshittification added recently, no? I was working on a very very very rough draft of enshittification in academic publishing before the holidays - are you saying not worth continuing down that path? 000
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 08/01/2026Great, but with lots more grey hair. What about you? What are you up to these days? 100
Reposted by Stefanie HausteininfoDOCKET @infodocket.bsky.social · 07/01/2026In Scientific #Publishing, Who Should Foot the Bill? undark.org/2026/01/07/a... (via @undark.org) #scholcomm #libraries @juancommander.scholcommlab.ca @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca 032
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinSamuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 07/01/2026'And according to @eschares.bsky.social, data suggest that APCs bear almost no relation to publishing expenses. “So that tells me that APCs are not set on really what it costs to produce an article there,” he said. “It’s more prestige.”' Undark piece on who should pay for scientific publishing.undark.orgIn Scientific Publishing, Who Should Foot the Bill?Publishers often charge authors to publish their publicly-funded research. Will a federal crackdown make a difference? 3127
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 07/01/2026There’s a certain type of publisher claim that always amuses me: “the value added to academic publishing”… used to be peer review, now it’s detecting AI slob 110
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinSantiago Gassó @sangasso.bsky.social · 04/01/2026🧪 I ran into this in another list. The title and the abstract of this paper is quite provocative. Table 1 with the profits of the 6 major sci publishing companies is something. arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820arxiv.orgThe Drain of Scientific PublishingThe domination of scientific publishing in the Global North by major commercial publishers is harmful to science. We need the most powerful members of the research community, funders, governments and ... 01812
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinBen Williamson @benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 19/12/2025Closing out my year with a journal editor shocker 🧵 Checking new manuscripts today I reviewed a paper attributing 2 papers to me I did not write. A daft thing for an author to do of course. But intrigued I web searched up one of the titles and that's when it got real weird... 6823741211
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinBen Williamson @benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 19/12/2025(Also, icyi, here are the 42 papers citing our non-existent paper which includes a "meta-analysis" - often called the evidence "gold standard" - of "LLM effects" in education 🤮 scholar.google.com.vn/scholar?star...)scholar.google.com.vn 1070891
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinFred Bordignon @freddie2310.bsky.social · 25/11/2025OpenAlex intégré au Web of Science, ou la capture du travail des “commoners” | carnetist.hypotheses.org/2572carnetist.hypotheses.orgOpenAlex intégré au Web of Science, ou la capture du travail des “commoners”C’est une annonce qui est passée relativement inaperçue, mais qui mérite que l’on s’y arrête un instant. Clarivate a récemment annoncé l’intégration d’OpenAlex comme une nouvelle base de données au se... 12928
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinJasmin Schmitz @jasminschmitz12.bsky.social · 11/12/2025"Today, the system rewards commercial publishers first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge". doi.org/10.48550/arX...doi.orgThe Drain of Scientific PublishingThe domination of scientific publishing in the Global North by major commercial publishers is harmful to science. We need the most powerful members of the research community, funders, governments and ... 052
Reposted by Stefanie Hausteinpolecopub @polecopub.bsky.social · 16/12/2025Elsevier at its best: they only embrace #openscience when it makes money and does not endanger their assets. Now that Crossref data is CC0 and used by 3rd parties (OpenAlex, Matilda,...), they just keep data in their systems @keanbirch.bsky.social #openresearchinformation @barcelonadori.bsky.social 097
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 16/12/2025Intense discussion with The Drain authors today about where to submit Part II.. And somehow @lariviev.bsky.social launched the idea of hockey jerseys?! Thanks for your service, ChatGPT. @danbrockington.bsky.social @hansonmark.bsky.social @stephenpinfield.bsky.social @aileenfyfe.bsky.social 071
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 16/12/2025Excited to join @braccolaetitia.social.sciences.re.ap.brid.gy & team at Open Science Monitoring Inititative (OSMI) as steering board member. Looking forward to work w/ Cécile Coulibaly, Moumita Koley, @susannanykyri.bsky.social & @jeroenson.bsky.social open-science-monitoring.org/meet-the-fiv... 152
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 16/12/2025Nice way to finish the year with such a quote in @science.org news: "Stefanie Haustein, an information scientist at the University of Ottawa, doesn’t buy publishers’ arguments." Thank you @phiejacobs.bsky.social! doi.org/10.1126/scie... 1193
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 16/12/2025Oh, 8am! For us it's 9pm. Which seems fair, since kids are in bed etc. 010
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 16/12/2025Reminds me of Ottawa 3-4 years ago. They now have a new system. It's as much high pressure but at least you are in a virtual queue and the website doesn't break down anymore... 110
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinOpen Research, University of Aberdeen @openresearchuoa.bsky.social · 11/12/2025On the 7th day before break, the OA community gave to us: Landmark research into the state of academic publishing. @hansonmark.bsky.social & team produced two papers: 'The Strain/Drain on Scientific Publishing' demonstrating the challenges we face doi.org/10.1162/qss_... doi.org/10.48550/arX...doi.orgThe strain on scientific publishingAbstract. Scientists are increasingly overwhelmed by the volume of articles being published. The total number of articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science has grown exponentially in recent years;… 173
Reposted by Stefanie HausteinOpen Access Tracking Project @oatp.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy · 03/12/2025We Need to Talk About the Billion-Dollar Industry Holding Science Hostage www.zmescience.com/science/news-sci…zmescience.comWe Need to Talk About the Billion-Dollar Industry Holding Science HostageYour tax dollars fund the research. You pay again to read it. 042