Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 11/06/2026To celebrate the debut of the Atlas of Innovation, a guide to funding innovation from IFP and the Market Shaping Accelerator, a thread of my favorite Atlas illustrations (by R. Kikuo Johnson)! First: “milestone payments” - get it? (Atlas explainer here: www.abundanceandgrowth.org/p/an-atlas-o...) 123
Reposted by Matt ClancyJoshua Rosenbloom @jlrosenbloom.bsky.social · 20/05/2026@mattsclancy.bsky.social as usual offers useful insights about the fate of social science funding at NSF Social science at the NSF open.substack.com/pub/abundanc...open.substack.comSocial science at the NSFHistory rhymes 011
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 29/01/2026It’s a debate between @jdworkin.bsky.social and @stuartbuck.bsky.social on the value of replicating research!open.substack.comBack and Forth on the Value of ReplicationFrom Stuart: 241
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 03/01/2026Are you a PhD student interested in the economics of innovation? The Economics of Ideas, Science, and Innovation Online short course, hosted by IFP, is back for the third time! ifp.org/economics-of...ifp.orgEconomics of Ideas, Science, and Innovation Online PhD Short Course | Institute for Progress 1105
Reposted by Matt ClancyAlex Armlovich @aarmlovi.bsky.social · 17/11/2025Excited to share I'm joining @openphil.bsky.social under @mattsclancy.bsky.social as the housing program officer for the Abundance & Growth Fund! Launching Niskanen's housing team has been a blast, & I'll remain a Senior Fellow with them But I'm thrilled to start supporting housers everywhere! 11632
Reposted by Matt ClancyGaétan @gderasse.bsky.social · 03/10/2025🔎 Patent citations are everywhere in innovation research. But do they really trace how ideas spill over between inventors—or are we mistaking legal paperwork for knowledge flows? 🧐 New on #ThePatentist: www.thepatentist.com/p/patent-cit... #patents #innovation #spilloversthepatentist.comPatent citations: Tracing spillovers or chasing shadows?Measuring how ideas move across firms and regions 033
Reposted by Matt ClancyBrian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 25/09/2025Excellent retrospective approach to a timely prospective question. 131
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 25/09/2025New research by Pierre Azoulay, Danielle Li, Bhaven Sampat and me. Earlier this year, the President’s budget proposed a 40% cut to the budget of the NIH. This motivated us to ask: what if the NIH had been 40% smaller? 22617
Reposted by Matt ClancyChris Elmendorf @cselmendorf.bsky.social · 20/09/2025If you're a thinker or do-er in the housing space and you haven't subscribed to @michaelwiebe.bsky.social's substack, you're doing it wrong! It's a living urban econ lit review, inspired by @mattsclancy.bsky.social's New Things Under the Sun. Great stuff! Here's an example ⤵️. 2122
Reposted by Matt ClancyAlexander Berger @albrgr.bsky.social · 17/09/2025Nice article on returns to R&D in MIT Tech Review, ft. our own @mattsclancy.bsky.social www.technologyreview.com/2025/09/17/... 0102
Reposted by Matt ClancyOtis Reid @otisreid.bsky.social · 27/07/2025Deadline to apply to these positions is today! Big opportunity to accelerate growth and progress in housing, energy, clinical trials, and more. 0116
Reposted by Matt ClancyCentre for Cities @centreforcities.bsky.social · 16/07/2025PODCAST | Remote working and the future of cities 🎙️ @andrewcities.bsky.social is joined by @mattsclancy.bsky.social to discuss hybrid working, productivity, cities and the future of work. Listen to the pod 🎧👇buff.lyCity Talks: Remote working and the future of cities - Centre for CitiesChief Executive Andrew Carter is joined by Matt Clancy, Senior Programme Officer at Open Philanthropy and the creator of New Things Under the Sun, a 022
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 09/07/2025The Abundance and Growth Fund at Open Philanthropy is hiring! We’re looking for 2-4 people to help expand this new $120+ million program to accelerate economic growth and reduce the cost of living through strategic grantmaking and research. (1/4) www.openphilanthropy.org/research/ann...openphilanthropy.orgAnnouncing Our New $120M Abundance And Growth Fund | Open PhilanthropyWe are excited to announce the launch of our new Abundance and Growth Fund, which will spend at least $120 million over the next three years to accelerate economic growth and boost scientific and tech... 3249
Reposted by Matt ClancySebastian Buhai @sbuhai.bsky.social · 18/06/2025Enter the 1st pop‑up journal, true living R&D ROI lab for Zvi Griliches: revisiting his seminal question, catalyzing his legacy in real‑time policy, and promising impact no posthumous Econ Nobel (which he more than deserved!) ever could. Arguably the wisest academic publishing initiative in decades. 032
Reposted by Matt ClancyShane McHugh @shanemchugh.bsky.social · 17/06/2025Such a clever idea. You could imagine its application to all sorts of wicked problems… 061
Reposted by Matt ClancyAnders Sandberg @arenamontanus.bsky.social · 17/06/2025This is a really cool kind of initiative: a pop-up journal on the returns to public R&D: popupjournal.com. Pop-up journals to coordinate research on questions that matter!popupjournal.comThe Pop-Up Journal Initiative 091
Reposted by Matt ClancyBrendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 17/06/2025Love this - need more innovation in academic publishing 0203
Reposted by Matt ClancyAlfred P. Sloan Foundation @sloanfoundation.bsky.social · 17/06/2025Very excited to join with Open Philanthropy on an all-out sprint to answer some of the thorniest practical questions in economics. First question: What return do we get when we invest in R&D? 1122
Reposted by Matt ClancyTim Bresnahan @timobres.bsky.social · 17/06/2025Good luck with this! An interesting innovation in the organization of the study of innovation. 051
Reposted by Matt ClancyDavid Marx @digthatdata.bsky.social · 17/06/2025interesting idea. we need more innovation in the research publication/curation space. 021
Reposted by Matt ClancyJakob Schneebacher @jschneebacher.bsky.social · 17/06/2025Interesting metascience experiment: a pop-up journal! Read @mattsclancy.bsky.social's thread for details and how to apply. 031
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 17/06/2025What’s the return on government support for R&D? To try to get a credible answer, Open Philanthropy and the Sloan Foundation are committing up to $1 million to trying something new: we call it a Pop-Up Journal. 15925
Reposted by Matt ClancyKarthik Ram @karthik.io · 25/04/2025✴️ REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS! ✴️ @navigation.org is seeking bold projects at the intersection of AI and Open Science. We support innovative applications that make science more transparent, efficient, and trustworthy. Deadline: July 15, 2025. os.nav.fund/ai-for-os/ #openscience #AIforScienceos.nav.fundAI for Open Science - Request for Proposals 01821
Reposted by Matt ClancyCatherine Rampell @crampell.bsky.social · 19/03/2025I've been told the US Patent and Trademark Office is expected to terminate its PatentsView contract, meaning all the datasets and disambiguation available at patentsview.org will likely go offline March 28. Associated github repository might also go offline.patentsview.orgPatentsView 916948
Reposted by Matt ClancyTobias Hoffmann @tobias1hoffmann.bsky.social · 03/03/2025Cool blogpost by @mattsclancy.bsky.social on (US) Government R&D spending. tldr: It is a good thing. #science4policy mattsclancy.substack.com/p/frequently...mattsclancy.substack.comFrequently Asked Questions About US Government Funding for R&DHow much? On what? What's the ROI? Etc. 001
Reposted by Matt Clancyjacobtref.bsky.social @jacobtref.bsky.social · 01/03/2025New blog post: Why should we have to pay for projects in foreign countries with our tax dollars? blog.jacobtrefethen.com/generosity/blog.jacobtrefethen.comGenerosityWhy should we have to pay for projects in foreign countries with our tax dollars? Well, we don't have to. It is a decision. At the moment the decision costs $15 per month each, $200 per year. The Uni... 0132
Reposted by Matt ClancyInstitute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 24/02/2025After being alerted about possible misconduct, the I4R are reproducing published papers that use data from a specific NGO (GDRI). This thread releases the first 2 reports and provides more information about the work and responses/statements from authors journals and journals. 🧵 313759
Reposted by Matt ClancyJeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 22/02/2025Graduate admissions being put on hold because of the chaos... 512793
Reposted by Matt ClancyResearch Group of J. Cabana @cabanachemistry.bsky.social · 20/02/2025This is very much worth a careful read. It strikes a very good balance of what’s good and what could be better. “Science is done by people” is an under-appreciated principle 021
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 20/02/2025New post! Frequently Asked Questions about US Government Funding for R&D. Short answers in the thread, longer answers at the link in the replies. 12712
Reposted by Matt ClancySoumaya Keynes @soumayakeynes.ft.com · 17/02/2025Fascinating conversation between @jburnmurdoch.ft.com and @mattsclancy.bsky.social about drivers of innovation in #TheEconomicsShow My favourite bit was the discussion after John asked whether wars could speed up innovation by making it more urgent podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/t... 34710
Reposted by Matt ClancyInstitute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 14/02/2025Join us for the University of Göttingen Replication Games on April 7th! We are looking for researchers and graduate students; all social science fields. Teams will also have the opportunity to reproduce a study focusing on deforestation if they want. Register here: surveymonkey.ca/r/Replicatio... 145
Reposted by Matt ClancyWilliam Gunn @metasynthesis.net · 12/02/2025How important is government funding to economic growth? @mattsclancy.bsky.social digs into the data: mattsclancy.substack.com/p/government... 021
Reposted by Matt ClancyAlexander Berger @albrgr.bsky.social · 10/02/2025Great blog from @mattsclancy.bsky.social on measuring returns to government R&D! One key finding: when govt funds a 1% increase in R&D “capital stock," the whole economy gets ~0.2% more productive a decade later. Compelling evidence we should invest more in research. 1145
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 10/02/2025@jburnmurdoch.ft.com invited me to talk about a post I wrote on his own viral article about changing attitudes towards progress. We ended up chatting about lots more! If this stuff interested you, here's a thread of links to learn much more. www.ft.com/content/3412...ft.com 2207
Reposted by Matt ClancyLisa L. Ouellette @handle.invalid · 10/02/2025A reminder that the US gets more $$ back for every $ spent on R&D. There are a lot of ways that the NIH and other grantmaking agencies could be improved, but even under the status quo they are generating enormous value, including lives saved, new jobs, and economic growth. 0179
Reposted by Matt ClancyCarl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 08/02/20251. Today the NIH director issued a new directive slashing overhead rates to 15%. I want to provide some context on what that means and why it matters. grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...grants.nih.govNOT-OD-25-068: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Cost RatesNIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Cost Rates NOT-OD-25-068. OD 25470014079
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 07/02/2025New post! Looking at three recent papers on the productivity impact of public R&D, all find positive impacts. mattsclancy.substack.com/p/government...mattsclancy.substack.comGovernment Funding for R&D and Productivity GrowthEstimating the returns to public R&D, using data 2309
Reposted by Matt ClancyTed Underwood @tedunderwood.com · 05/02/2025Great article, clearly addressing a fundamental question about literary change. Events matter, retirements matter, but what really matters is: 1253
Reposted by Matt ClancyLauren Gilbert @lgilbert.co · 05/02/2025New op ed from Tom Wein, @garrisonlovely.bsky.social and I on PEPFAR and giving up the legacy of US power in Africa: foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/05/p...foreignpolicy.comTrump Has Put George W. Bush’s Lifesaving Legacy in DangerPEPFAR is a critical part of U.S. soft power in Africa. 0206
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 27/01/2025Since AI’s impact on jobs is in the discourse, reposting this explainer I did in June on economic models of automation and labor outcomes. www.newthingsunderthesun.com/pub/4bnobp5qnewthingsunderthesun.comWhen the Robots Take Your JobSome Intuitions From Recent Models of Automation 0103
Reposted by Matt ClancyInstitute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 27/01/2025Join us for the Minnesota Replication Games on March 17th! We are looking for researchers and graduate students; all social science fields! Participants get coauthorship to a meta-paper combining reproductions/replications! Register here: www.surveymonkey.ca/r/Replicatio... 174
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 27/01/2025New post! Looking at who benefits more from technologies that make discovery easier; literal maps, genome wide association studies, and machine learning.open.substack.comDo Prediction Technologies Help Novices or Experts More?It can go either way 1175
Reposted by Matt ClancyMax Nathan @maxnathan.bsky.social · 27/01/2025Who benefits from prediction technologies? The usual great and helpful stuff from @mattsclancy.bsky.social. Dropping this straight into my course reading! mattsclancy.substack.com/p/do-predict...mattsclancy.substack.comDo Prediction Technologies Help Novices or Experts More?It can go either way 1127
Reposted by Matt ClancyInstitute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 22/01/2025New research alert! Our study investigates the effectiveness of human-only, AI-assisted, and AI-led teams in assessing the reproducibility of quantitative social science research. We've got some surprising findings! 310048
Reposted by Matt ClancyViktoria Cologna @colognaviktoria.bsky.social · 20/01/2025Our global study on the state of trust in scientists is now out in Nature Human Behaviour! 🥳 With a team of 241 researchers, we surveyed 71,922 people in 68 countries, providing the largest dataset on trust in scientists post-pandemic 👇🧵https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-02090-5 24903384
Matt Clancy @mattsclancy.bsky.social · 19/01/2025My take on BlueSky vs Twitter is that they’re both bubbles, but different kinds of bubble, and the best option is to use both. 3110