Sign in

Philippe Batut

@philippebatut.bsky.social
171 followers 229 following 30 posts

Long-range #gene regulation: #enhancer, #transcription, 3D #genome, noncoding #RNA and #epigenetics | #LiveImaging & #Genomics | Asst Prof. at Columbia University www.batutlab.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
As you point out, the extra cool plot twist in their case that the enhancer + ncRNA promoter are derived from an LTR retrotransposon...
020
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Thanks @evgenykvon.bsky.social! Yes absolutely, this may very well be a similar mechanism. Intriguingly, in both cases it involves a long-range enhancer assisted by a tethering/facilitator element, and upgrading the ncRNA core promoter to a stronger one (SCP or eve) further decreases gene activity.
120
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Congrats @joadelas.bsky.social!
100
Reposted by Philippe Batut
Joaquina Delas @joadelas.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
If you are curious about quantitative and predictive cell date decisions landscapes but our 14 figure paper seemed just a bit daunting, have a look at James' linked summary.
12012
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
This suggests ncRNA transcription is under strong selective pressure, but strict primary sequence not so much...
110
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
We saw a similar pattern of sequence conservation in a prior transcriptomic study of lncRNA evolution across species. lncRNAs shared between species show strong sequence conservation at the TSS but not throughout the body: elifesciences.org/articles/29005 #RNAsky #transcription #evolution
110
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Hi @endonuclease.bsky.social! We only see high conservation very locally over ~50bp surrounding the TSS (Fig 1C), corresponding to the core promoter – but not throughout the body of ncRNAs. This pattern of sequence conservation is only revealed thanks to single-nucleotide TSS mapping via PRO-cap
110
Reposted by Philippe Batut
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
1\ We know a bit about how 3D chromatin interactions are formed, but what do we know about how they are disrupted? We asked this question in our latest preprint: doi.org/10.64898/202..., focusing on the massive loss of promoter interactions during neuronal differentiation.
doi.org
Developmentally programmed loss of long-range Polycomb interactions is regulated by cohesin
Distal regulatory elements (DREs), such as enhancers, can regulate genes across megabase-long distances, presumably via coming into close spatial proximity. The establishment of new transcriptional programmes during cell type transitions is associated with widespread rewiring of the spatial organisation of the genome, including gain and loss of chromatin interactions. Extensive effort has been invested into understanding how chromatin interactions are formed during development, yet the mechanisms underlying their developmental loss remain largely unclear. By leveraging chromatin accessibility-assisted footprinting, acute protein degradation and chromatin conformation capture, we show that loss of promoter interactions cannot be explained by reduced binding of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs). Instead, we identify a subset of interactions that depend on cohesin for programmed developmental disruption. These sites are characterized by high Polycomb enrichment and TF occupancy and engage in strong long-range interactions that undergo extensive differentiation-dependent rewiring. Preventing interaction loss by acute cohesin degradation results in the preferential downregulation of associated genes. Together, these results suggest that cohesin indirectly regulates developmental loss of Polycomb interactions by enabling the acquisition of other potentially regulatory contacts in a process that may shape transcriptional programs during cell type transitions. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. European Research Council Helmholtz Society, VH-NG-1604
24824
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
A great thread about our new paper by science writer @philipcball.bsky.social! Thank you for writing about our story @science.org
093
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
This year's winner (Credit Dr. Ning Xu)
000
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Scientific research is the driver of progress in medicine & technology & a remarkable engine of prosperity. Last but not least, it's a way to see the sheer beauty of our world by looking at it in ways we never did before Nikon 2026 Small World in Motion award Video @nytimes.com nikonsmallworld.com
120
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
This being said, the jury is still out on the exact mechanism at play here. In particular, how eRNAs might modulate looping – and whether this involves regulation of cohesin/loop extrusion – remains to be seen.
020
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
And both cohesin & loading factor Nipped-B were originally identified as regulators of long-range enhancer activity in Drosophila (by Dale Dorsett & co)!
100
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Hi @benoitbruneau.bsky.social! We didn't test this in our paper, but the evidence does suggest a role for cohesin. E.g., Cohesin/NIPBL appears to facilitate initial search and increase the frequency of long-range contacts, while tethering elements may stabilize some loops (PMID: 41756876).
110
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Thanks @claudiocantu81.bsky.social! There's clearly specificity to ncRNA functions, eg Scr eRNA is repressive but a 2nd ncRNA is activating (see Fig 3). So we're just scratching the surface, and different ncRNA may have diverse functions! Maybe eRNA also binds TFs but w/loose seq constraints? TBD :)
110
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Thank you friends and neighbors at @aydoganlab.bsky.social !! :)
000
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Thanks Timothée @successprocess.bsky.social !
010
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Read our paper for the full story and a broader discussion of how this might fit with the work of others in the field. Also check out this recent paper by the Wysocka, @andersshansen.bsky.social and Boettiger labs, which describes a phenomenon with many similarities in mammalian cells:
nature.com
Promoter strength and position govern promoter competition through transcript-dependent insulation - Nature Genetics
By inserting diverse promoters at the mouse Sox2 locus, Koska et al. show that promoter strength, position and transcript length tune promoter competition through transcription-dependent insulation, i...
1121
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
9/ Many thanks to all the friends and colleagues who made this work possible, and to our reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments!
170
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
8/ Overall, ncRNA transcription at the enhancer inhibits enhancer activity and disrupts long-range chromatin loops. We propose that this incoherent feedforward – the enhancer activates the gene, yet also indirectly represses it via eRNAs – controls the timing of gene activation in development.
161
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
7/ We also found that eRNAs act at least in part by controlling 3D genome organization, specifically weakening long-range interactions between a distal tethering element (DTE) and the gene promoter. Simultaneous deletion of the eRNA TSS and the DTE is synthetic lethal!
171
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
6/ Is this RNA-dependent? Replacing the eRNA body with phage λ sequences does not alleviate repression (it strengthens it), so it’s not strictly sequence-dependent. But insertion of a premature polyA site causes early gene activation, showing that full-length ncRNAs are required.
280
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
5/ This suggested that, while the enhancer promotes gene activation, eRNA production might repress it. To test this, we deleted the eRNA TSS (45bp). This led to precocious activation of the gene, establishing that ncRNA transcription controls the timing of gene activation in vivo.
170
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
4/ To peer into the interplay between enhancer and gene, we co-visualized eRNA and mRNA transcription in cis. We find that gene activation actually coincides with a reduction in enhancer transcription, and that optimal gene activation seems to be achieved at low levels of enhancer activity.
161
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
3/ The transcriptional dynamics of the Scr gene and ncRNAs associated with two regulatory elements reveal a multi-step ‘launch sequence’. Surprisingly, the enhancer is highly active early on – yet this appears to fall on deaf ears, as the gene remains inactive for another 45 mins:
172
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
2/ To see this with our own eyes, we turned to live imaging – and to the HOX genes. We visualized, in real time, the transcription of an endogenous eRNA (magenta spots) produced by a distal enhancer of the HOX gene Scr (green, in trans) in individual nuclei (grey) of live fly embryos:
1133
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
1/ It was discovered decades ago (in Drosophila, by Hogness & Akam labs) that regulatory regions are transcribed, and eRNAs have now emerged as important players in gene regulation. Many regulatory elements produce ncRNAs in embryos – but does that matter? Sequence conservation suggests it does:
160
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
🧬🔬 Why are enhancers transcribed and how does that impact gene regulation? I’m really excited to share our new paper in @science.org showing that noncoding RNAs control the timing of gene activation in embryos. With Mike Levine #ScienceResearch @columbiamed.bsky.social A few highlights below... 🧵👇
science.org
Noncoding transcription controls the developmental dynamics of long-range gene regulation
The genomic regions regulating gene expression are often themselves transcribed into a variety of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). However, the regulatory roles of this noncoding transcription remain largely ...
5235115
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
The Batut Lab is now on Bluesky! @columbiauniversity.bsky.social @columbiamed.bsky.social #3Dgenome #RNAsky #transcription #research #science #AcademicSky #NewPI Checkout our website: www.batutlab.com
batutlab.com
BATUT LAB | Columbia
0101
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
040
Reposted by Philippe Batut
Rada-Iglesias Lab @radaiglesiaslab.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Have you ever wondered why developmental genes are often regulated by enhancers located at long distances? In this @natgenet.nature.com perspective, we speculate that long-range enhancer positioning may provide regulatory properties essential for proper gene expression www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Mechanisms and functional implications of long-range enhancer-dependent gene regulation - Nature Genetics
Development depends on gene regulation by enhancers across long genomic distances. This Perspective discusses mechanisms enabling long-range enhancer–promoter communication and the potential advantage...
29633
Reposted by Philippe Batut
Luca Giorgetti lab @FMI @lucagiorgetti.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
Our preprint is now out in @natgenet.nature.com ! doi.org/10.1038/s415... We measured Sox2 promoter bursting dynamics with the SCR enhancer positioned at different distances within a genomic locus devoid of confounding effects in mESC: Main findings in the 🧵 below:
doi.org
Enhancer control of promoter activity and variability via frequency modulation of clustered transcriptional bursts - Nature Genetics
Tünnermann et al. use live-cell imaging to study promoter activity under the control of an enhancer inserted at different genomic distances. RNA production from the promoter occurs in clusters of tran...
48345
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
Welcome to Columbia @begumaydin.bsky.social! Looking forward to having a great new colleague in our department.
110
Reposted by Philippe Batut
Wendy Bickmore @wbickmor.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
It was great working with students Kun and Ryan and @hannahlong.bsky.social, combing the literature to try and find examples of bona fide disease-causing variants in non-coding elements - promoters, enhancers and silencers. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Mechanisms underlying disease-causing variants in promoters and enhancers - Nature Genetics
This Review discusses how rare-disease-causing variants in the noncoding genome impact gene regulation, why these examples are so few and how new approaches could accelerate discovery of noncoding var...
16424
Reposted by Philippe Batut
Claudia Mimoso @camimoso.bsky.social · 04/08/2026
Excited to share our latest review on transcript elongation out now at @natrevmcb.nature.com!! It was an absolute pleasure to work on this review with @isaacfianu.bsky.social and @adelmanlab.bsky.social!
0219
Reposted by Philippe Batut
Geoff Faulkner @faulknerlab.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
If you can't otherwise access it, here's a link to read our recent Science paper for free (valid for the first 2,000 clicks!): www.science.org/eprint/BYBPQ...
science.org
X-chromosome inactivation draws L1 mutagenesis to the human X chromosome
X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) enables gene dosage compensation in XX eutherians. Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) retrotransposons are unusually abundant on the human X chromosome and are ...
0125
Philippe Batut @philippebatut.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
A great story from our colleagues at Columbia! @columbiauniversity.bsky.social
030