Sign in

Angelika Feldmann

@angelikafeldmann.bsky.social
97 followers 103 following 15 posts

Group Leader @DKFZ, Heidelberg, passionate about gene regulation and its timing

PostsRepliesMedia
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
1\ We know a bit about how 3D chromatin interactions are formed, but what do we know about how they are disrupted? We asked this question in our latest preprint: doi.org/10.64898/202..., focusing on the massive loss of promoter interactions during neuronal differentiation.
doi.org
Developmentally programmed loss of long-range Polycomb interactions is regulated by cohesin
Distal regulatory elements (DREs), such as enhancers, can regulate genes across megabase-long distances, presumably via coming into close spatial proximity. The establishment of new transcriptional programmes during cell type transitions is associated with widespread rewiring of the spatial organisation of the genome, including gain and loss of chromatin interactions. Extensive effort has been invested into understanding how chromatin interactions are formed during development, yet the mechanisms underlying their developmental loss remain largely unclear. By leveraging chromatin accessibility-assisted footprinting, acute protein degradation and chromatin conformation capture, we show that loss of promoter interactions cannot be explained by reduced binding of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs). Instead, we identify a subset of interactions that depend on cohesin for programmed developmental disruption. These sites are characterized by high Polycomb enrichment and TF occupancy and engage in strong long-range interactions that undergo extensive differentiation-dependent rewiring. Preventing interaction loss by acute cohesin degradation results in the preferential downregulation of associated genes. Together, these results suggest that cohesin indirectly regulates developmental loss of Polycomb interactions by enabling the acquisition of other potentially regulatory contacts in a process that may shape transcriptional programs during cell type transitions. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. European Research Council Helmholtz Society, VH-NG-1604
24924
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Great to see this wonderful work out! Congratulations!
000
Angelika Feldmann @angelikafeldmann.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
Honored and grateful to be receiving this generous prize from the family of Hella Bühler and @uniheidelberg.bsky.social. Big thanks to my lab and colleagues @dkfz.bsky.social, esp. to our directly involved collaborators: @niopeklab.bsky.social, @banitolab.bsky.social, and Frank Westermann.
2170
Reposted by Angelika Feldmann
mathiaseder.bsky.social @mathiaseder.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
🔥 How does CTCF shape enhancer–promoter communication? In our new preprint, we systematically test how the position and orientation of CTCF binding sites (CBSs) influence gene regulation at the mouse Sox2 locus. 🧪 full paper can be found here: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
12712