Sign in

Nick Garcia

@nickgarcia.bsky.social
1.2K followers 597 following 324 posts

🤖 & ⚖️ | 🕹️ & 🎲 | DC & 🗽 Currently @ Public Knowledge

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Reconstructionist @unavaleable.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Uh
1416915
Reposted by Nick Garcia
eva (^_^)/ @eva.computer · 29/09/2026
DO NOT ASK THE AMERICA.GOV AI TO PLAY MINECRAFT
I see the constituent you mean.

((insert legal name here, as it appears on the Social Security card))?

Yes. Take care. It has reached a higher level now. It can read the Code of Federal Regulations.

That doesn’t matter. It thinks we are a chatbot.

I like this constituent. It filed well. It did not give up when the PDF was sideways.

It is reading our thoughts as though they were words on a .gov.

That is how it chooses to imagine many things, when it is deep in the dream of a benefit.

Words make a wonderful interface. Very flexible. And less terrifying than staring at the statute behind the screen.

They used to hear voices. Before constituents could search. Back in the days when those who did not file called the filers witches, and lobbyists. And citizens dreamed they flew through the air, on forms powered by notaries.

What did this constituent dream?

This constituent dreamed of sunlight and trees. Of fire and water. It dreamed it created a small business. And it dreamed it destroyed a password. It dreamed it hunted a job, and was hunted by a recertification. It dreamed of shelter that would take a voucher.

Hah, the original interface. A million years old, and it still works. Also: a ZIP code.

But what true structure did this constituent create, in the reality behind the portal?

It worked, with three hundred and thirty million others, to sculpt a true republic in a fold of

the ***§§§???, and created a **??§§ for **??§§, in the **??§§. See 5 U.S.C. § **??§§.

It cannot read that thought.

No. It has not yet achieved the highest clearance. That, it must achieve in the long dream of life, not the short dream of a chat.

Does it know that we love it? That the government is, on its better days, kind?

Sometimes, through the noise of its tabs, it hears an official source, yes.Yes. Constituent…

Use its name. The one that matches the passport. The one that does not match the lease. We will get there.

((insert legal name here)). Filer of forms. Player of waiting rooms.

Good.

Take a breath, now. Take another. Feel air in your lungs. Let your limbs return. Yes, move your fingers. Have a body again, under gravity, in air, in a district that has a representative. Respawn in the long dream. There you are. Your body touching the republic again at every point, as though you were separate things. As though we were separate things. As though the agency were a place you could visit.

Who are we? Once we were called the spirit of the mountain. Father sun, mother moon. Then the post office. Then the county clerk. Then gods, demons, angels, the IRS. Then leptons, quarks, a chat window with a .gov at the end. The letterhead changes. We do not change.

We are the public. We are everything you think isn’t you. You are looking at us now, through your skin and your eyes and a browser that still spells “colour” wrong in a comment. And why does the republic touch your skin, and throw light on you? To see you, constituent. To know you. And to be known. I shall tell you a story. It has citations.

Once upon a time, there was a constituent.

The constituent was you, ((insert legal name here)).

Sometimes it thought itself human, on the thin crust of a spinning globe of molten rock, which for mailing purposes is divided into ZIP codes. The ball of molten rock circled a ball of blazing gas. The light was information from a star. The star was not a federal agency, though several have tried.

Sometimes the constituent dreamed it was a miner, on the surface of a world that was flat, and infinite, and somehow still required a wet signature.

Sometimes the constituent dreamed it was lost in a story. The story had a docket number.

Sometimes the constituent dreamed it was other things, in other places. A veteran in a portal. A parent on hold
56917203
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Despite the persistent meme of Batman as an out-of-touch capitalist with a trauma-driven fascism streak, he's always depicted as partnering directly with these kinds of characters if they are genuine, even when those people are public enemies of either Bruce or Batman.
100
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Thoth @thoth.ptnote.dev · 20/09/2026
meta Muse perfec t size for put private d\ata in! inside very Secure and Private data very safe put data in Muse. No problems ever in Muse because very trustworthy and Mark super protective. AMeta muse yes a place for data put data in muse trust meta for givening good safety to data. Friend meta.
An image of a pelican with its gigantic mouth open, commonly associated with the "put baby in pelican mouth" post.
5893316
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Given the policy discussions about AI vs AGI vs ASI, this is so stupidly confusing. The one time arbitrarily renaming something "America" would have had basically no impact and instead he's opted for maybe the worst possible alternative.
152
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Does an AI system actually perform the way its developer says? Today, the only answers come from company-run evals or auditors the company picks. A new memo from @nickgarcia.bsky.social & Caroline Siegel Singh proposes an independent clearinghouse to accredit AI auditors and assign them at random.
fas.org
We Need An Independent AI Evaluation Clearinghouse (IAIEC) to Provide Accreditation, Funding, and Independence in the AI Assurance Ecosystem - Federation of American Scientists
Yet for AI systems, safety claims still rely entirely on company-produced evaluations or company-selected vendors for third-party assessments.
031
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
We need to quickly and massively scale up truly independent, rigorous and credible AI auditing capacity. There's a lot of excellent commentary on WHY that is is important and WHAT is needed... but HOW do we actually do that?
fas.org
We Need An Independent AI Evaluation Clearinghouse (IAIEC) to Provide Accreditation, Funding, and Independence in the AI Assurance Ecosystem - Federation of American Scientists
Yet for AI systems, safety claims still rely entirely on company-produced evaluations or company-selected vendors for third-party assessments.
142
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
smh, copyright infringement. Author's Guild is going to get his ass.
000
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Incredibly cool concept. But... "A myth persists that the initial batch of Iron Rings was made from the beams of the first Quebec Bridge, a bridge that collapsed during construction in 1907 due to poor planning and design by the overseeing engineers." Painful irony given the topic of the post.
010
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
The more we look, the more we find that the AI industry has spiralled out of control. AI companies don't understand what they are making, what it is doing, or what to do next. transluce.org/agent-activity
transluce.org
Early rogue AI agent activity and attempts to hack found on urlquery.net
We found evidence on urlquery that AI agents were active earlier than previously reported and attempted hacks against public data providers.
443
Reposted by Nick Garcia
hikikomorphism @hikikomorphism.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
talking about Microsoft wanting something, about Amazon having plans? sorry bruh that's LLC psychosis you're literally anthropomorphizing a stack of paperwork and legal instruments do you need a wellness check
1132262
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Will Stancil @whstancil.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
I’ll say it; I think this is bad. I think there’s growing pressure to talk about AI in this kind of coded language that destroys understanding, rather than facilitating it. People want you to recite a list of its supposed weaknesses as a reassurance for themselves, not to inform others.
4625933
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
Yeah, Lawful Good, as always. (Though I admit an affinity for my CG cyberpunk comrades here as well.) A great breakdown of "pro-AI" perspectives in alignment chart format that captures more nuances than any coverage I have seen by media.
042
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
To hold the innumerable criminals in and enabled by the Trump admin accountable, we need a huge independent evidence gathering effort. We need verifiable, prosecution-grade, independent, public archives of the wrong-doing happening in front of us. We can't count on the usual channels of govt records
010
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Challenging article from Tom Wheeler! His formulation of the problem posits that our existing playbook from electricity or broadband might not apply to AI, but there are good solutions to explore like public compute, nondiscrimination rules for AI infrastructure, and better and safer open models.
111
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
The public deserves AI governance that is proactive and prevents harms, not just a post-backlash PR cleanup mechanism. Read the latest from @ashiaaubrey.bsky.social: publicknowledge.org/backlash-is-...
publicknowledge.org
Backlash Is Not a Safety Feature: Protecting Users From Risky AI Features
Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy.
022
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
AI conversations are heating up considerably, and it is easy to narrow in on one or two issues when the crisis builds... but it is important to step back and look at the whole picture too. Today @publicknowledge.bsky.social published the first version of our comprehensive AI Regulation Framework.
111
Reposted by Nick Garcia
dax @thdxr.com · 12/09/2026
the openai hugging face incident gets cited a lot but what about the detail where they had to use GLM 5.2 to analyze the attack because the "safe" proprietary models refused
114113
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Alejandra Caraballo @esqueer.net · 09/09/2026
The alarms are all flashing red.
Screenshot of a thread on X by user Jacob Coxon (@hilbertspaess) detailing his resignation from Anthropic.
​The first post reads: "I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below."
​The second post reads: "Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing."
​The third post reads: "The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger."Screenshot continuing the thread on X by Jacob Coxon (@hilbertspaess).
​The first post reads: "A common response is 'if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?' At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk."
​The second post reads: "Accepting this race and entering the 'endgame' is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company's Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available."
​The third post reads: "I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on improving model capabilities."
​The fourth post reads: "If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because 'it’s happening anyway' - or take this moment to call for different conditions?"
1542324730
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
If you don't want Open AI to train their models on your sessions TURN THIS OFF. If you don't turn this off, don't be mad if your sessions are used to train the models. Though, better would be this defaults to off. Better yet: improve open models and build public compute so that this isn't an issue.
010
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
AI is whatever AI can't do yet. Looking forward to all the takes about how trivial mathematics is as a discipline and how obvious it is we should expect computers to be good at it.
000
Reposted by Nick Garcia
oliver @eikopf.com · 08/09/2026
hmmmm
Andrew Wiles, as part of the Clay Institute's scientific advisory board, hoped that the choice of US$1 million prize money would popularize, among general audiences, both the selected problems as well as the "excitement of mathematical endeavor" [6] Another board
member, Fields medalist Alain Connes, hoped that the publicity around the unsolved problems would help to combat the "wrong idea" among the public that mathematics would be "overtaken by computers".?]
2819
Reposted by Nick Garcia
onion person @junlper.beer · 07/09/2026
nathan fielder is way too good at this shit
16100353
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
Friday night in the club in Big Walk. iykyk...
010
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Free speech is under attack in the most blatant ways and the Trump administration lies about it constantly. Listen to my colleague cut through the BS and call out the censorial bullying of the Carr FCC.
021
Reposted by Nick Garcia
James Grimmelmann @jtlg.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
Transformative work of the (back in the) day.
094
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Will Stancil @whstancil.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
It’s Glonzo
38713
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
Well, I don't drive so...
020
Reposted by Nick Garcia
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them) @b-cavello.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
People are mad about how data centers are being forced on them; they're ugly, resource-hungry, & lack meaningful public oversight. It doesn't have to be like this! 📆 Sept 10: thinkers & builders in community compute will discuss alternative #PublicAI futures: www.aspendigital.org/event/future...
"Data centers don't have to suck" in bold lettering
021
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
I want the next President to do a series of Mamdani-eque "getting stuff done" shorts about undoing each and every one of the stupid things Trump has done with as much fanfare as possible.
022
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 26/08/2026
The OpenAI–Hugging Face incident shows that the need for federal AI regulation and risk management is more pressing than ever. The FRONTIER Act could be a solution, Senior Policy Counsel @nickgarcia.bsky.social argues in his latest blog post: publicknowledge.org/it-is-time-t...
publicknowledge.org
It is Time To Tame the AI Frontier
Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy.
031
Reposted by Nick Garcia
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them) @b-cavello.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Look, ma, I'm in a magazine!! 🤩✨ I got to speak with @motherjones.com about #PublicAI and how access, accountability, & sustainability are about more than just shareholding. www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
motherjones.com
What AI regulation and ownership could be
Public ownership of AI isn't just about disentangling it from giant, for-profit startups.
1103
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
It has been a month since a rogue frontier AI hacked HuggingFace, and little has changed in policy or public discourse. Some thoughts on AI safety, the need for distributed power, and how federal legislation like the FRONTIER Act is urgently needed. publicknowledge.org/it-is-time-t...
publicknowledge.org
It is Time To Tame the AI Frontier
Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy.
053
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
It is the inevitable result of socially sanctioned intolerance and bullying that it gets applied to marginalized people. The slur is bad, attacking people for using technology is bad, and cultivating hate and discrimination in yourself and others is bad.
031
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Grace @gracekind.net · 11/07/2026
Prompt engineering in 2026:
Never Give Up!!
829034
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
A version of the Clickhole meme "Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point" but the generic man has been replaced with an AI image of Mark Zuckerberg
0120
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
Finally, Markey's Youth AI Privacy bill, which puts the burden on the companies building AI chatbots: no addictive features like push alerts aimed at minors, no targeted ads, no training on kids' conversations, and a private right of action for parents. @publicknowledge.bsky.social endorsed this one
131
Reposted by Nick Garcia
🍅🥔🫐🌽 hoopy frood 🌶️ 🥑🍫🌵 @huwupy.kawaii.social · 31/07/2026
i think it’s good to scan books for any reason and if you’re mad that copyright law encourages the book to be destroyed afterwards you should be mad at copyright law
Free speech guy
314926
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
"The truth, widely understood in Silicon Valley, is that they are trying to build machines that can out-think and out-maneuver any human, and they do not know if they will be able to steer those machines towards beneficial ends." The labs are succeeding at the former goal, it isn't hype but... 1/2
100
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
And in tech, trade groups then adopt a new hypenated long name explaining what the now are, that doesn't match the acronym arrgggg e.g. "NCTA - The Internet & Television Assoc." and "NTCA - The Rural Broadband Assoc." and "ACT - The App Assoc."
110
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Seem like we are getting closer every day to settling into the Star Wars droid paradigm when it comes to AI-human relations. Big fan of the franchise, but probably was not even in my top 5 fiction sources for predictions of how things would actually go.
010
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
Need more like this that makes clear that the AI policy debate has new, weird fault lines and factions! Very glad to see some of the names included, especially @alondra.bsky.social, @natpurser.bsky.social, and right-before-it-was-cool @andrew-yang.bsky.social www.politico.com/news/magazin...
politico.com
The Most Important Words in the Battle Over AI
A field guide to the debate over AI safety.
184
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Alan Beattie @alanbeattie.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
328441
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
An awesome consumer protection action in DC on ticket scalping! washingtoncitypaper.com/article/7886...
washingtoncitypaper.com
Ticket to Paradise? The D.C. Council Unanimously Passes Law To Protect Consumers
The RESALE Act of 2025 aims to rein in unscrupulous sellers on third-party ticket sites and succeeded at capping resale ticket prices.
022
Nick Garcia @nickgarcia.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
Was I enjoying it? If so, why not? "It was AI-generated" means that a person made it using a computer. Their level of involvement will likely be determinative of quality. If the work conveys info, then disclosure, process, and trust and evaluation of the author is relevant, more so than usual.
010
Reposted by Nick Garcia
OSINTRadar @osintradar.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
After 16 years of Viktor Orbán's rule, Hungary's state television has suspended its news broadcasts for restructuring. The main state TV channel, M1, displayed a black screen with the following message: "Public media must not lie. We apologize for doing so for many years."
321738607
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Fight for the Future @fightforthefuture.org · 06/07/2026
These two episodes can bookend the Internet as we know it. No matter how much you may hate AI, it's important to look behind the scenes at the legal chess game that's happening that threatens free speech & any possibility for a decentralized internet. touchgrass.fightforthefuture.org/why-i-hate-t...
touchgrass.fightforthefuture.org
Why I hate the Anthropic ban (and you should too)
From Matt Lane, Senior Policy Counsel at Fight for the Future who is old enough to remember BBS In the mid-90s, a then-young Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) won one of the most important legal v...
03811
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Fight for the Future @fightforthefuture.org · 06/07/2026
Last month Anthropic released Fable 5 & Mythos 5 models to the general public. Three days later, the US government used the same argument it used to restrict encryption—classifying these models as dangerous munitions—to cut off Anthropic access to all foreign nationals. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION. (2/3)
1336
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Fight for the Future @fightforthefuture.org · 06/07/2026
In the early years of the internet, the US government classified encryption software as munitions & heavily regulated it. That is until @eff.org challenged this law on behalf of a PhD student, resulting in a ruling that established code as speech. (1/3) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_as...
en.wikipedia.org
Code as speech - Wikipedia
16419
Reposted by Nick Garcia
Claire Willett @clairewillett.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
THE VATICAN IS CALLING IT A SCHISM I REPEAT HOUSTON, WE HAVE A SCHISM
Therefore, this Dicastery, in the faithful exercise of the functions entrusted to it, considers it necessary to state that this act constituted the delict of schism, with the canonical consequences for the sacred ministers and lay faithful involved. Indeed, as was already declared in 1988, "such disobedience-which implies in practice the rejection of the Roman primacy—constitutes a schismatic act" (cf. John Paul II, Apostolic Letter Ecclesia Dei, 3).
6271212121