Sign in

Morgan Wilsmann

@mwils.bsky.social
397 followers 592 following 340 posts

Policy Analyst @ Public Knowledge Content Moderation, Platform Regulation, News Policy

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
The disappointing outcome of the multiyear Google ad-tech antitrust case is the latest example of antitrust enforcement alone being insufficient to rein in Big Tech. It's time for a digital regulator, says Audrey Black in her latest blog post: publicknowledge.org/its-time-for...
publicknowledge.org
It's Time for a Digital Regulator
Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy.
023
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
There's lots of reasons why algorithms shouldn't be (and cant regulated) directly, but it's a head-in-the-sand belief that algos aren't at least partly to blame for causing compulsive use and harm. The idea behind this bill is to 1) disincentivize algo-driven engagement maximizing advertising &
100
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Pretty amazing to me that one of the first moves from Trump II was an executive order "ending federal censorship", and in the ~20 months since, the admin tramples on 1A rights every chance it gets. What's also remarkable is how events like these expose the lack of understanding of 1A
114
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Cruz & Wyden's JAWBONE Act passed out of committee this morning, thanks to Dem support from @edmarkey.bsky.social @rosen.senate.gov @schatz.bsky.social - each of whom has spoken loudly against censorship coming out of FCC Chair Carr. A crucial step toward neutering Carr's censorship efforts!
011
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
JAWBONE Act is finally scheduled for a markup. Nearly a year ago, PK's @haroldfeld.bsky.social told Sen. Cruz we'd support a law that clarifies when the bully pulpit crosses the line into unconstitutional coercion of speech and gives victims of censorship pathways to justice. & now its here!
012
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Local news policy may not be the top of many peoples' minds, but man is it important. Local news is so crucial for fighting corruption, mobilizing civic engagement, building community, holding leaders to account... This is a historic moment and Newsom's gotta sign this NEWS Act in to law!!!
0135
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
Australia is drafting legislation requiring a 'Digital Duty of Care' that would give users choice over their social feeds - which is fine. The alarming bit is the requirement to "protect under-18s" (read: censor content from under-18s) from this list of legal content: www.pm.gov.au/media/my-fee...
They will also be required to protect under 18s from harmful content like: 

content that promotes, encourages or accelerates eating disorders
content that promotes hostile ideas about women and gender equality
pornography
content that glorifies crime or life endangering stunts
content that causes serious mental health distress, including abuse and bullying.
Australians will benefit from better protection from seriously harmful and illegal content across digital services, and social media users will be afforded more choice.
110
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
cant say i'm surprised the google ad tech monopoly remedies are so lackluster!
000
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Virtually no one is claiming this Meta settlement is a big win for platform accountability and online safety, but it's definitely not nothing. The most concerning part is how the settlement sidesteps any First Amendment questions about age assurance and regulating recommendation algorithms.
221
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
Today, France's Constitutional Council struck down a bill that banned under-15s from accessing social media -- a pretty notable setback for Jonathan Haidt & his supporters' crusade to get the world to get kids off of social media
reuters.com
France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s
France's top court on Friday blocked ​a bill banning social media access for ‌under-15s, saying it infringed upon freedom of expression, a setback for President Emmanuel Macron who asked his governmen...
111
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
The people who built careers exposing the alleged 'censorship industrial complex' are now running the most aggressive government speech suppression operation. Shuttering USAID, defunding academics & researchers, harassing media watchdog groups... It's so expansive and so deeply hypocritical.
010
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
We have a markup of a handful of kids online safety bills in Senate Commerce committee this morning. Out of the dozens of bills Chair Cruz could select, he chose: SCREEN Act (age verification for adult sites), Sen. Blackburn's KOSA, Markey's Youth AI Privacy Act, and Cruz's CHATBOT Act
commerce.senate.gov
Executive Session 24 - U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation
353
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
Congress agrees AI chatbots need guardrails for kids — but they very much do not agree on how. Policy Analyst @mwils.bsky.social breaks down why @markey.senate.gov's Youth AI Privacy Act is the right model:
041
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
Gvmt jawboning has only gotten worse and worse - notably coming from FCC Chair Carr's "easy way or the hard way" threats, or from DOJ's forced takedown of Facebook ICE watch group, and dozens of other examples. JAWBONE Act bolsters 1A rights by giving a way to hold gov. censors accountable
010
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 19/05/2026
Senator Hawley's GUARD Act age gates AI Companions but 1) the way companions are defined could sweep up most AI Chat bots and 2) does nothing to make AI companies design products with safety at the forefront. Fortunately, there are two far better options in the Senate. Read about it!
030
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Momentum for age verification laws at the state, federal, and international level is high and not going away. Age gating is bad for the open internet and free expression, but if it has to be done, we have do it in targeted, privacy and expression preserving ways. Here's how to do it right:
publicknowledge.org
From 'Should We?' to 'How?': A Framework for Getting Age Assurance Right
Public Knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. We work to shape policy.
120
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
The Verge @theverge.com · 28/04/2026
Former FCC officials want to force a vote on the ‘weapon’ Brendan Carr has invoked against broadcasters
buff.ly
Former FCC officials want to force a vote on the ‘weapon’ Brendan Carr has invoked against broadcasters
The bipartisan group says it’s been “weaponized for partisan purposes.”
23912
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
Many of the claims in these social media addiction trials should be thrown out on S230 grounds…. But not everything. I make that distinction here, knowing well there will be some disagreement on where we draw the line b.w feature & content!
010
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
Advertisers avoiding placing ads next to harmful or misleading content isn’t “censorship” – it's capitalism at work. So why is the FTC treating it like a conspiracy? Read the latest from Policy Director @lisahmacpherson.bsky.social: publicknowledge.org/the-ftcs-new...
publicknowledge.org
The FTC’s New Settlement With Ad Agencies Still Misses the Point
The FTC and a coalition of eight states reached settlements with three advertising agencies to resolve a complaint about whether the agencies had worked with third parties to anticompetitively boycott...
033
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
Follow the FTC Oversight hearing with me in this thread!
021
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
Senate Commerce is holding an FTC oversight hearing this morning. Curiously, in announcing the hearing, Chair Cruz pointed to Biden FTC Chair Khan as "weaponizing the agency" as justification for the hearing... but Khan is long gone. Chair Ferguson & Commissioner Meador are witnesses
commerce.senate.gov
Oversight of the Federal Trade Commission - U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation
163
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Stephan Lewandowsky @lewan.uk · 09/04/2026
Second fix: reform the business model. Proposals include a progressive digital advertising tax, interoperability & in-situ data rights so users can choose their own algorithms. As long as misinformation is profitable, it will persist. 7/10
17111
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
Happy #localnewsday ! Are you subscribed to your local news paper?
localnewsday.org
000
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
To add - the settlement was clear to STILL allow these agencies to communicate with social media platforms (1A right!). And it does nothing to prevent the very real and persistent censorship threats from the Trump admin - made all the worse if(when) Humphrey's is overturned
020
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Last week, I expressed my confusion when Sen. Schmitt touted this settlement as a "huge win for Missouri". All the settlement does forbid CDC, Surgeon Gen., & CISA from coercing platforms to moderate plaintiffs in Missouri & Louisiana. But... those agencies have no coercive power already.
111
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
"A U.S. judge on Thursday dismissed X Corp's antitrust lawsuit ​that accused the World Federation of Advertisers and major ‌companies including Mars, CVS Health, and Colgate-Palmolive, of illegally boycotting billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk’s social media company."
reuters.com
Judge dismisses lawsuit by Musk's X Corp accusing advertisers of illegal boycott
A U.S. judge on Thursday dismissed X Corp's antitrust lawsuit ​that accused the World Federation of Advertisers and major ‌companies including Mars, CVS Health and Colgate-Palmolive of illegally boyco...
121
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Juries in two different cases reached similar verdicts re: whether Meta & Google should be liable for harm minor users experience from using their platforms. To date, most attempts to make online platforms accountable for harms have failed - thanks to a combo of S230 liable shield & 1st Amend.
reuters.com
Explainer: What comes next after the social media trial verdicts?
Recent jury verdicts in California and New Mexico involving Meta Platforms and Alphabet's Google are sharpening scrutiny of social media companies as plaintiffs advance legal theories aimed at holding...
133
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Sen. Schmitt is bragging that he "won" Missouri v. Biden (Murthy v. Missouri) because the Trump admin agreed to settle, including a 10-year ban on the CDC, CISA, and the Surgeon General from coercing platform content decisions ... which is already illegal.
We just won Missouri v. Biden.

As Missouri’s Attorney General, I sued the Biden regime for brazenly colluding with Big Tech to silence Missouri families — censoring the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election. They tried to turn Facebook, X, YouTube, and the rest into their private speech police, labeling dissent “misinformation” while they pushed their narrative on the American people.

Today, after years of unrelenting litigation, we deep state into a historic 10-year, court-enforceable Consent Decree. It directly binds the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA: no more threats of legal, regulatory, or economic punishment. No more coercion. No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech.

Missouri struck first—and Missouri won big.

This is the first real, operational restraint on the federal censorship machine. It locks in the First Amendment principle we fought for: modern technology doesn’t erase your rights, and government labels don’t strip speech of protection. The deep state just got checked.

For every working Missouri family tired of being silenced by their own government: this victory is yours. The heartland fought back, and the heartland delivered.
230
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
The FCC’s “public interest” standard has never been clearly defined in law – a flexibility that has historically helped the agency adapt over time. But in the hands of Chairman Brendan Carr, it's become a vulnerability he seems eager to exploit.
152
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
Chair Carr has offered to help broadcast media get their facts straight. "Facts" means only positive coverage of the President. "Help" means the threat of federal license review. He knows the First Amendment limits what the FCC can actually do here. Doesn't matter, bc the threats are working.
111
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Matt Wood @mattfieldwood.bsky.social · 19/03/2026
This is literally disgusting, politically and personally. But at least this means that from now on, I can call him "Beta Brendan" forever.
053
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Matt Wood @mattfieldwood.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
Bergman is right to tell Sen. Blackburn that big tech companies put profits over safety; but please remember everyone that when Blackburn touts KOSA, she wants it to combat the trans agenda whatever that is. #Section230 #SenateCommerce www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...
nbcnews.com
Senator appeared to suggest bipartisan bill would censor transgender content online
The Kids Online Safety Act, aimed at protecting children from harmful online content, has been endorsed by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, as well as by President Joe Biden.
155
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
Senate Commerce Committee is talking Section 230 tody. As Congress debates its future, it's important to remember what all this law protects – and what it doesn’t. Read from @bergmayer.net on why careful Section 230 reform, and not repeal, will help ensure a better internet for everyone:
publicknowledge.org
What Section 230 Is and Does — Yet Another Explanation of One of the Internet's Most Important Laws
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act immunizes internet platforms from any liability as a publisher or speaker for third-party
011
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
Another Congressional hearing today related to online speech! Right now, Senate Commerce committee is holding a hearing "Liability or Deniability? Platform Power as Section 230 Turns 30". Witnesses range from Section 230 abolishers, to reformers, to absolutists. I'll be tracking the hearing 🧵
commerce.senate.gov
Liability or Deniability? Platform Power as Section 230 Turns 30
WASHINGTON, D.C. –U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, will convene a full committee hearing titled “Liability or Deniability? Pl...
11011
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
House E&C is marking up a bunch of kids online safety bills today. Some familiar faces, like COPPA 2.0 and KOSA, have been revised. Some interesting design-related bills wrapped up in "Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act" package. Unfort. its combined w/ some serious anti-privacy/censorship bills.
energycommerce.house.gov
Full Committee Markup of Nine Bills
The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing com...
21917
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Stronger privacy laws, limits on manipulative design, transparency requirements, and targeted changes to Section 230 itself could address platform harms without breaking what works. But repeal would be disastrous.
142
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
S230 repeal may seem like an easy way to stick it to Big Tech, but it's not that simple. Platform accountability is needed, but all s230 repeal would do (especially now!) is give powerful people the ability to silence voices they disapprove of.
021
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
Last year, Policy Director @lisahmacpherson.bsky.social laid out two reform ideas that both avoid infringing on either the user or platform’s free expression, and could meaningfully allow for platform accountability for user harm – especially for kids.
publicknowledge.org
Public Knowledge Proposes Section 230 Reforms That Address Harms While Protecting Free Expression
The potential harms of digital content online can be devastating — but removing Section 230 would only devastate freedom of expression in its place.
022
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
We see some of the same section 230 repeal ideas pop up year after year - including to replacing "otherwise objectionable" with just "unlawful" to make platforms neutral conduits of speech (driven by the "anti-conservative bias" rhetoric). ...but its not so simple
067
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
Wrote this after the 1st "Europe’s Threat to American Speech and Innovation" hearing in the House Judiciary last year. The facts haven't changed since. Yet Repubs continue to waste resources on the POTENTIAL for censorship of Americans in EU, while ignoring real censorship right here in the U.S.
052
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
And to be clear: Paramount-Skydance buying WBD would be just as bad. That deal would combine two of the Big Five studios, merge the #4 and #5 streaming services, and create a massive sports broadcasting power. Any sale of WBD that deepens media consolidation should be blocked.
101
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
It's Section 230's 30th birthday, and we're bound to see many, many calls for its repeal. But much of that is driven by a misunderstanding of what S230 does and does not do. Data brokers' attempts to use Section 230 as a shield are one example of where protection begins and ends.
032
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
Section 230 isn't just a liability shield for online platforms - it's also essential for news journalism and freedom of expression online. Read more in the breakdown from @mwils.bsky.social in her latest blog post: publicknowledge.org/section-230-...
Graphic of a cell phone receiving notifications from various apps, with text that reads: Public Knowledge. Section 230 30th anniversary
01210
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
...it was never meant to be a blanket exemption from the kinds of economic, safety, and privacy regulations that apply to other businesses. As @bergmayer.net explains, boundaries are important: #Section230 is meant to protect speech, not business practices. publicknowledge.org/speech-and-c...
publicknowledge.org
Speech and Commerce: What Section 230 Should and Should Not Protect
Section 230 plays a role in allowing sites with user-generated content to operate while giving them the ability to moderate their platforms
011
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Public Knowledge @publicknowledge.bsky.social · 21/01/2026
#Section230 is both one of the most important and most misunderstood pieces of legislation that affect the internet. As its 30th birthday approaches, read the breakdown from @bergmayer.net on what exactly this law does – and why repeal is the wrong approach. publicknowledge.org/what-section...
Graphic of a cell phone receiving notifications from various apps, with text that reads: Public Knowledge. Section 230 30th anniversary
078
Reposted by Morgan Wilsmann
Nora Benavidez @attorneynora.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
We @freepress.bsky.social condemn the invasion of reporter Hannah Natanson's home by FBI agents. We joined together with 30 other press freedom & civil liberties groups with this statement, calling for congressional oversight & reintroduction of the PRESS Act: www.freepress.net/news/31-pres...
freepress.net
31 Press-Freedom and Civil-Liberties Groups Condemn Government Invasion of Washington Post Reporter’s Home
31 press-freedom and civil-liberties groups published a join statement condemning the government invasion of the home of Washington Post journalist Hannah Natanson.
15130
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
Shout out Rep. Menendez's questioning on whether "FCC is an independent agency". Baffled to hear Carr's response to why he wrote that the FCC is indeed independent in Project 2025 was "well, I wrote that in a personal capacity." So does he not actually buy into the unitary executive theory... ?
010
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
We have another FCC oversight hearing today, this time in the House Communications & Tech. Subcommittee. Listening to @agomezfcc.bsky.social now - who opens excoriating the FCC Chair for exploiting the public interest standard to justify censorship efforts.
energycommerce.house.gov
C&T Subcommittee: Oversight of the Federal Communications Commission
The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing com...
110
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
020
Morgan Wilsmann @mwils.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
@publicknowledge.bsky.social didn't wait for Congress to finally decide to have an oversight hearing to ensure concerns were put in the public record. Last month, we convened former agency staff, civil society leaders, and members of Congress for the "People's Oversight Hearing"
publicknowledge.org
A Recap of The People’s Oversight Hearing
In the absence of congressional action, the event provided an opportunity to investigate the failures of independent agencies to serve the public interest.
031