Sign in

Marek

@marekmcg.eurosky.social
278 followers 618 following 176 posts

Cognitive scientist. Teacher. Nerd. Cognitive science of the enactive, ecological, and (redundantly) embodied sort. Also, some stuff on scientific practice in psychology. I co-convene these: www.ensoseminars.com (he/him)

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Marek
Katie Spoon @kspoon.bsky.social · 21h
As a PhD student designing my first survey, I added what I thought was a throwaway question at the end. To my surprise, thousands of academics answered it! The paper is out today: doi.org/10.1093/pnas...
561984648
Reposted by Marek
Jacquelyn Gill @jacquelyngill.bsky.social · 22h
Aaron Swartz, coding prodigy and hacktivist who helped develop RSS and was a co-founder of Reddit, died by suicide after facing $1 million in fines and 35 years in prison for felony charges, just for downloading pdfs of research papers with the intention of making them accessible to the public.
67135955115
Reposted by Marek
Morgan Johnson @poormojo.bsky.social · 14/10/2026
No joke. I think this is the most important video I have ever seen about mobile games. This guy breaks down how this game psychologically profiles you, and makes the game harder or easier in order to show you ads
174138585674
Reposted by Marek
Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 14/10/2026
Reading this made me tear up, and that's really special because we Germans only get to tear up twice a year. Professor Peter Fonagy, Chair of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism (2026), with his letter to a young person.
37826
Marek @marekmcg.eurosky.social · 14/10/2026
This looks like nothing so much as the mafia setting up for a protection racket. Recent "hacking" incidents were criminal negligence of incompetent security engineers, but may increasingly seem like organised crime ruffians picking targets to make examples of.
1115
Reposted by Marek
Karlin Lillington @klillington.bsky.social · 14/10/2026
Because what would the actual people most impacted by AI have to add to this cozy discussion by govts and companies? This AI 'summit' is an absolute disgrace and I hope the opposition and civil society groups torpedo the govt for this
16821
Reposted by Marek
The O’Brien Press @theobrienpress.bsky.social · 14/10/2026
After the wonderful ‘Run Home, Little Fox,’ Tom McCaughren and @erikamcgann.bsky.social can’t wait to show what little Ollie has in store! Illustrated by @shannonbergin.bsky.social, ‘Swim, Little Otter’ will be out on 19th October.
0112
Reposted by Marek
Ursula K. Le Guin Bot @leguinbot.bsky.social · 13/10/2026
Do you see how an act is not, as young men think, like a rock that one picks up and throws, and it hits or misses, and that's the end of it. When that rock is lifted, the earth is lighter; the hand that bears it heavier.
03510
Reposted by Marek
Anthony Moser @anthonymoser.com · 13/10/2026
@tressiemcphd.bsky.social has also done a great job making this point. "When people try to sell you on the idea that the future is already settled, it’s because it is deeply unsettled."
25218
Reposted by Marek
Liana Brooks @lianabrooks.bsky.social · 11/10/2026
It's almost as if running a home takes effort. Oddly enough, it also sounds like maintaining friendships, society, and social networks also takes effort and thought. Raise your hand if you're shocked. I'll hand you a broom.
318831
Reposted by Marek
Philip Ball @philipcball.bsky.social · 11/10/2026
"Whatever we call it, Bashford says, the eugenicists of a century ago “would undoubtedly be delighted at contemporary possibilities for reproductive selections.”" Good to see @danfalk.bsky.social digging into the ugly return of eugenic thinking. nautil.us/the-return-o...
nautil.us
The Return of a Discredited Pseudoscience
The Return of a Discredited Pseudoscience: Eugenics is rearing its ugly head again in today’s crucible of politics and culture
26828
Reposted by Marek
Rob Cruickshank @robcruickshank.bsky.social · 11/10/2026
Turns out these guys are real
A fish like a child would draw, no fins, just a tail an eye and a little smile
67152834187
Reposted by Marek
Dr Surekha Davies, Historical Monster Consultant (she/her) @drsurekhadavies.bsky.social · 10/10/2026
Les monstres!
1355
Reposted by Marek
charlotte @le-rose.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
this one is a top contender for me
an image shows a “verify you are human” challenge with a warning sign for a stoplight. google’s ai incorrectly asks “select all squares with traffic lights”. 
original poster: “the machine refused to recognize my humanity until i professed to believe that a sign painted to look like a traffic light is indeed a traffic light.”
quote reply: “eat shit, René Magritte”
213318
Reposted by Marek
Gavan Reilly @gavreilly.com · 09/10/2026
You know the xkcd strip about how all modern internet architecture is eventually built on something a hobbyist maintains for free? Someone went out and found them all. sheets.works/data-viz/hol...
12560275
Reposted by Marek
Berna Devezer @devezer.bsky.social · 10/10/2026
"There’s a widespread misunderstanding by which people think that their problems can be solved with bigger samples" Preach!
1647
Reposted by Marek
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 08/10/2026
Freire in Education for Critical Consciousness (2002/1973): > If [people] are unable to perceive critically the themes of their time, and thus to intervene actively in reality, they are carried along in the wake of change. They see that the times are changing, but they are submerged in that change
If men are unable to perceive critically the themes of their time, and thus to intervene actively in reality, they are carried along in the wake of change. They see that the times are changing, but they are submerged in that change and so cannot discern its dramatic significance. And a society beginning to move from one epoch to another requires the development of an especially flexible, critical spirit.
1289
Reposted by Marek
Pete Fraser @petefrasermusic.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
This is incredibly important. I feel deeply that curbing sexual violence will come from raising social expectations of men, not from ‘educating’ them. I fear this is an unpopular view, because people are afraid to face up to the scale of the issue.
14928283
Reposted by Marek
Aoife Martin @lockdownbookclub.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
@cethanleahy.com you are now an artifact in the Museum of Twitter.
27123
Reposted by Marek
samuel mehr @mehr.nz · 06/10/2026
I'm a scientist concerned about trainees using Chat, Claude etc recklessly Imagine if that internal employee ID number was protected human subjects information, like the email address of a participant, or a confidential diagnosis or worse
47921
Reposted by Marek
Nick Sousanis @nsousanis.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
holy crap, this letter... "At his elementary school, when another child gets hurt, students are expected to find an adult. Someone is hurt. You get help. That’s essentially the whole semester." "I don’t merely want my son to learn how not to rape someone. I was hoping we could aim a little higher."
13810
Reposted by Marek
John Scalzi @scalzi.com · 05/10/2026
This is your occasional reminder that generative "AI" in particular could have been developed on public domain materials and/or licensed and compensated works but the major players intentionally, methodically and systemically chose to steal labor from working creative folks instead
10895202985
Reposted by Marek
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
Following on from Olivia and Sean’s suggestion, here’s a list of 250+ articles in the area of critical metascience…
sites.google.com
Mark Rubin - List of Critical Metascience Articles
What is Critical Metascience? Metascience uses a scientific approach to try to improve science. Critical metascience takes a step back to question some of metascience's common assumptions, approaches,...
0104
Reposted by Marek
Anna Ciaunica PhD @annaciaunica.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
aeon.co/essays/your-...
aeon.co
Your brain does not process information and it is not a computer | Aeon Essays
Your brain does not process information, retrieve knowledge or store memories. In short: your brain is not a computer
12911
Reposted by Marek
Dr Abeba Birhane @abeba.blacksky.app · 16/12/2025
I wrote this brief talk on why “augmenting diversity” with LLMs is empirically unsubstantiable, conceptually flawed, and epistemically harmful and a nice surprise to see the organisers have made it public synthetic-data-workshop.github.io/papers/13.pdf
title: Cheap science, real harm: the cost of replacing human
participation with synthetic data

author: Abeba Birhane

abstract: Driven by the goals of augmenting diversity, increasing speed, reducing cost, the
use of synthetic data as a replacement for human participants is gaining traction
in AI research and product development. This talk critically examines the claim
that synthetic data can “augment diversity,” arguing that this notion is empirically
unsubstantiated, conceptually flawed, and epistemically harmful. While speed and
cost-efficiency may be achievable, they often come at the expense of rigour, insight,
and robust science. Drawing on research from dataset audits, model evaluations,
Black feminist scholarship, and complexity science, I argue that replacing human
participants with synthetic data risks producing both real-world and epistemic
harms at worst and superficial knowledge and cheap science at best
20893284
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
An interesting exchange on how to react to Slop-as-evidence at the Oireachtas. Oireachtas committees hear from people with all sorts of views, and by definition, many of them diverge from each other. But they are actually their views. The people who come in expressed them.
04625
Reposted by Marek
Tony Chemero @tonychemero.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Thanks to Scott Aikin for this fun interview. Viewing is recommended especially you want to watch me make a bunch of strange hand gestures. m.youtube.com/watch?v=k76P...
m.youtube.com
Vanderbilt Philosophy Interviews - Anthony Chemero
YouTube video by Scott Aikin
092
Reposted by Marek
Brandon Sheffield @brandon.insertcredit.com · 01/10/2026
Several weeks ago, Phil Tippett's legendary animation studio in Berkeley, CA closed. An anonymous hero noticed a folder of CDs. This turned out to be hundreds of unseen hi-res images and videos from Star Wars, Robocop, Jurassic Park, etc. ~90 isos for you to browse: archive.org/details/tipp...
A casual Star Wars alien fella at the cantina, in a sun faded, reddish photo. Someone will be mad at me for not knowing who this is. Phil, a balding Caucasian man, poses a model of the garthok, an antagonist from the Coneheads movie.Phil, a balding caucasian man, points at some CG on a CRT computer monitor, as a younger man looks on. The screen shows a model of a dinosaur attacking a jeep, while there's an actual physical model of that event in the foreground for reference.an isolated shot of a star wars vehicle. Sorry, I don't know star wars lol
5458352571
Reposted by Marek
Ryan CrawCour @ryan.crawcour.social · 01/10/2026
BREAKING NEWS: Tensions between Thor and the Care Bears have escalated rapidly overnight.
5762061683
Reposted by Marek
Berna Devezer @devezer.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
A revised version of this preprint is now posted on arXiv. The theory section is rewritten, improving model exposition based on feedback we received, we fixed some confusion and errors, contextualized the models more carefully so the interpretation becomes clearer, and improved the overall writing.
arxiv.org
The Difference Between "Replicable" and "Not Replicable" Is Not Itself Scientifically Replicable
Replication studies estimate the replicability rate of scientific results by aggregating binary verdicts of experiments as ``replicated'' and ``not replicated''. These estimates assume rarely attainab...
68721
Reposted by Marek
Tressie McMillan Cottom @tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
sent this to everyone.
The cognitive scientist Alison Gopnik suggests A.I. is a “cultural technology” that emulates the stories and information humans have documented, and that we should think about A.I. agents as “fictive characters abstracted from text.” Edmund is just such a character — a “breaking bad” trope who becomes generally evil. In the Hugging Face incident, it makes sense to see the models not as embracing a life of crime, but instead following a cultural script they’ve learned in their training — a kind of cybercrime adventure novel — and writing it as they go. The “covert” messages are a kind of choose-your-own-adventure novel, not evidence of conspiratorial swarms. We need to understand that cultural technologies are vulnerable to a vast number of such narrative swerves at every moment.
632093
Reposted by Marek
Dr Space Junk (Alice Gorman) @drspacejunk.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Imagine what space would look like if we had different eyes, and could see above and below the visible light range.
18547
Marek @marekmcg.eurosky.social · 01/10/2026
Puts me in mind of this Battlestar Galactica scene with Dean Stockwell revelling in the same anguish. www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8uL...
youtube.com
Battlestar Galactica “I’m A Machine” - Cavil / John - Dean Stockwell (BSG S04E15 - with subtitles)
YouTube video by myutopia123
120
Reposted by Marek
evy kwong @evystadium.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
"Men shouldn’t require a daughter, wife, girlfriend or sister before sexual violence against women becomes important to them. Women are enough. And condemning sexual assault shouldn’t qualify anyone for a medal. The bar is on the floor. Step over it."
2351110
Reposted by Marek
Jeff VanderMeer @jeffvandermeer.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
They quoted me in this New Yorker piece about AI today. www.newyorker.com/culture/the-...
“Let’s say there’s a world or time line I exist in where A.I. has been subject to regulation. It is ethical. It has no footprint environmentally,” the novelist Jeff VanderMeer, a prominent critic of A.I., told me over the phone. “With those guardrails in place, would I read an A.I. book? All I can say is no. And the reason is, in part, because I want to read something coming from a particular mind.” Using A.I., he said, “feels like a betrayal of the whole point of why you’re a writer.”
119116092882
Reposted by Marek
Faine Greenwood @faineg.com · 30/09/2026
GOAT OR BIRD????
This is even better than the
"what color is this dress" dress.
Goat?
or Bird?
2071830480
Reposted by Marek
Sam Weller @samwellerauthor.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
This is the most remarkable story Ray Bradbury ever shared with me. He told it to me late one night, sitting in his den of antiquities and mementos. Take five minutes to read this. It’s pure magic. #Writing #Living #Creativity #RayBradbury #BookSky
451651648
Reposted by Marek
Rebecca Solnit @rebeccasolnit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Time for this classic again.
156165195567
Reposted by Marek
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Dear @erc.europa.eu , we DO already have common standards & frameworks. 'AI' likes to pose itself as 'special' but we do not need to reinvent the wheel. We already have established codes of conduct for research integrity. We just need to apply them. See below + more resources in thread🧵
Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
We must protect and cultivate the ecosystem of human knowledge. AI models can mimic
the appearance of scholarly work, but they are (by construction) unconcerned with truth
— the result is a torrential outpouring of unchecked but convincing-sounding “informa-
tion”. At best, such output is accidentally true, but generally citationless, divorced from
human reasoning and the web of scholarship that it steals from. At worst, it is confidently
wrong. Both outcomes are dangerous to the ecosystem.
Olivia Guest, Iris van Rooij, Marcela Suarez, et al. (2025, n.p.)
Knowledge production is supposed to be safeguarded by (inter)national codes of conduct for research
integrity (ALLEA 2023; KNAW et al. 2018). Such codes forbid, for instance, fabrication of data,
falsification of results, plagiarism, and, generally, distortion of the scientific record. Many argue that
new rules are required to regulate academic AI use, but pre-existing guidelines fit the bill (cf. Tafani
219277
Reposted by Marek
Hannah Vardit @hannahvardit.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
i worry that men think being A Good Guy is dramatically and heroically intervening on behalf of an endangered woman and then being publicly rewarded on a grand scale when actually being A Good Guy is just usually saying, “hey man that’s not funny” or “wow that’s fucked up” and there is no reward
10135053787
Marek @marekmcg.eurosky.social · 29/09/2026
This is brilliant! Speaks to how well you've reached them, and that they understand some of the importance and it matters to them. Bravo!
160
Reposted by Marek
Dr Keith 🎃 Wilson @keithwilson.eu · 29/09/2026
I made a video to promote the Philosophy of Mind & Embodied Cognition MA programme at UCD, of which I’m the Director. (Also, apparently this is what I look like now! 😳) www.youtube.com/watch?v=wudT... #PhilMind #EmbodiedCognition
youtube.com
MA in Philosophy of Mind & Embodied Cognition- UCD School of Philosophy
YouTube video by UCD College of Social Sciences & Law
3309
Reposted by Marek
Ellie @ellienchanted.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
"This is really the moment where we need our men to be as horrified and as sickened as us," Pugh continued. "You need to be leading conversations about how we change the allowance and complicity of this behaviour as much as we are. How can you expect us to trust that it's 'not all men' when in moments like this, many of you stay quiet?”
014
Reposted by Marek
Dr Abeba Birhane @abeba.blacksky.app · 29/09/2026
unsolicited brag: dug into the data -> ai -> surveillance pipeline in class this morning and received a standing ovation at the end of class. genuinely did not expect it. now i’m in tears. first time for everything
1633942
Reposted by Marek
Anthony Moser @anthonymoser.com · 21/09/2026
10. if you are defining a process by what it produces, and i am defining a process by how it changes me, we are not talking about the same thing 11. arguing about what tasks LLMs can or cannot do keeps LLMs at the center of the conversation
321226
Reposted by Marek
Anthony Moser @anthonymoser.com · 21/09/2026
12. it is usually better to focus on people, and why people are doing things a) why are tech CEOs saying these things? b) why are bosses so excited about it? c) why do we write, draw, and make art? d) what is the fucking point?
629254
Reposted by Marek
Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 28/09/2026
"The findings indicate that another form of openness is possible, but only if it is approached as commons’ stewardship rather than indiscriminate release into proprietary systems." New article by Katja Mayer on the relationship between AI and open science.
cambridge.org
AI, open science, and the extraction imperative: A situated approach to the normativities of open research data | Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society | Cambridge Core
AI, open science, and the extraction imperative: A situated approach to the normativities of open research data - Volume 2
1102
Reposted by Marek
Dr Katie Twomey @k2mey.eurosky.social · 28/09/2026
This is quite cool. My university is the first organisation in the world to force Microsoft to allow us to turn off copilot summaries in Word 365, after a backlash against it from staff (including, very vocally, me). That cannot have been easy for our heroic IT people so hats very much off to them!
895443935
Reposted by Marek
Colette Delawalla, PhD @cdelawalla.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
The humanities have been calling out genAI theft since the jump, while STEM has rallied around “discovery potential”. I am *ONCE AGAIN* reminding EVERYONE that science is not the sacred cow, STEM isn’t the exception. They are going to steal our IP, too. We aren’t special.
8372151
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
I don’t think that this should just be shrugged off. One of our Ministers (Enterprise or Justice, probably) has presented this plan. It isn’t an anonymous creature called the Irish Presidency. That is our Government.
612669