Sign in

Marek

@marekmcgann.bsky.social
274 followers 617 following 175 posts

Cognitive scientist. Teacher. Nerd. Cognitive science of the enactive, ecological, and (redundantly) embodied sort. Also, some stuff on scientific practice in psychology. I co-convene these: www.ensoseminars.com (he/him)

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Marek
Tony Chemero @tonychemero.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Thanks to Scott Aikin for this fun interview. Viewing is recommended especially you want to watch me make a bunch of strange hand gestures. m.youtube.com/watch?v=k76P...
m.youtube.com
Vanderbilt Philosophy Interviews - Anthony Chemero
YouTube video by Scott Aikin
072
Reposted by Marek
Brandon Sheffield @brandon.insertcredit.com · 01/10/2026
Several weeks ago, Phil Tippett's legendary animation studio in Berkeley, CA closed. An anonymous hero noticed a folder of CDs. This turned out to be hundreds of unseen hi-res images and videos from Star Wars, Robocop, Jurassic Park, etc. ~90 isos for you to browse: archive.org/details/tipp...
A casual Star Wars alien fella at the cantina, in a sun faded, reddish photo. Someone will be mad at me for not knowing who this is. Phil, a balding Caucasian man, poses a model of the garthok, an antagonist from the Coneheads movie.Phil, a balding caucasian man, points at some CG on a CRT computer monitor, as a younger man looks on. The screen shows a model of a dinosaur attacking a jeep, while there's an actual physical model of that event in the foreground for reference.an isolated shot of a star wars vehicle. Sorry, I don't know star wars lol
4751352268
Reposted by Marek
Ryan CrawCour @ryan.crawcour.social · 01/10/2026
BREAKING NEWS: Tensions between Thor and the Care Bears have escalated rapidly overnight.
5659341614
Reposted by Marek
Berna Devezer @devezer.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
A revised version of this preprint is now posted on arXiv. The theory section is rewritten, improving model exposition based on feedback we received, we fixed some confusion and errors, contextualized the models more carefully so the interpretation becomes clearer, and improved the overall writing.
arxiv.org
The Difference Between "Replicable" and "Not Replicable" Is Not Itself Scientifically Replicable
Replication studies estimate the replicability rate of scientific results by aggregating binary verdicts of experiments as ``replicated'' and ``not replicated''. These estimates assume rarely attainab...
68119
Reposted by Marek
Tressie McMillan Cottom @tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
sent this to everyone.
The cognitive scientist Alison Gopnik suggests A.I. is a “cultural technology” that emulates the stories and information humans have documented, and that we should think about A.I. agents as “fictive characters abstracted from text.” Edmund is just such a character — a “breaking bad” trope who becomes generally evil. In the Hugging Face incident, it makes sense to see the models not as embracing a life of crime, but instead following a cultural script they’ve learned in their training — a kind of cybercrime adventure novel — and writing it as they go. The “covert” messages are a kind of choose-your-own-adventure novel, not evidence of conspiratorial swarms. We need to understand that cultural technologies are vulnerable to a vast number of such narrative swerves at every moment.
632092
Reposted by Marek
Dr Space Junk (Alice Gorman) @drspacejunk.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Imagine what space would look like if we had different eyes, and could see above and below the visible light range.
18547
Reposted by Marek
evy kwong @evystadium.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
"Men shouldn’t require a daughter, wife, girlfriend or sister before sexual violence against women becomes important to them. Women are enough. And condemning sexual assault shouldn’t qualify anyone for a medal. The bar is on the floor. Step over it."
2349108
Reposted by Marek
Jeff VanderMeer @jeffvandermeer.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
They quoted me in this New Yorker piece about AI today. www.newyorker.com/culture/the-...
“Let’s say there’s a world or time line I exist in where A.I. has been subject to regulation. It is ethical. It has no footprint environmentally,” the novelist Jeff VanderMeer, a prominent critic of A.I., told me over the phone. “With those guardrails in place, would I read an A.I. book? All I can say is no. And the reason is, in part, because I want to read something coming from a particular mind.” Using A.I., he said, “feels like a betrayal of the whole point of why you’re a writer.”
119114902853
Reposted by Marek
Faine Greenwood @faineg.com · 30/09/2026
GOAT OR BIRD????
This is even better than the
"what color is this dress" dress.
Goat?
or Bird?
2071824479
Reposted by Marek
Sam Weller @samwellerauthor.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
This is the most remarkable story Ray Bradbury ever shared with me. He told it to me late one night, sitting in his den of antiquities and mementos. Take five minutes to read this. It’s pure magic. #Writing #Living #Creativity #RayBradbury #BookSky
391528604
Reposted by Marek
Rebecca Solnit @rebeccasolnit.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Time for this classic again.
155164125539
Reposted by Marek
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Dear @erc.europa.eu , we DO already have common standards & frameworks. 'AI' likes to pose itself as 'special' but we do not need to reinvent the wheel. We already have established codes of conduct for research integrity. We just need to apply them. See below + more resources in thread🧵
Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
We must protect and cultivate the ecosystem of human knowledge. AI models can mimic
the appearance of scholarly work, but they are (by construction) unconcerned with truth
— the result is a torrential outpouring of unchecked but convincing-sounding “informa-
tion”. At best, such output is accidentally true, but generally citationless, divorced from
human reasoning and the web of scholarship that it steals from. At worst, it is confidently
wrong. Both outcomes are dangerous to the ecosystem.
Olivia Guest, Iris van Rooij, Marcela Suarez, et al. (2025, n.p.)
Knowledge production is supposed to be safeguarded by (inter)national codes of conduct for research
integrity (ALLEA 2023; KNAW et al. 2018). Such codes forbid, for instance, fabrication of data,
falsification of results, plagiarism, and, generally, distortion of the scientific record. Many argue that
new rules are required to regulate academic AI use, but pre-existing guidelines fit the bill (cf. Tafani
217469
Reposted by Marek
Hannah Vardit @hannahvardit.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
i worry that men think being A Good Guy is dramatically and heroically intervening on behalf of an endangered woman and then being publicly rewarded on a grand scale when actually being A Good Guy is just usually saying, “hey man that’s not funny” or “wow that’s fucked up” and there is no reward
10134253769
Reposted by Marek
Dr Keith Wilson 💭 @keithwilson.eu · 29/09/2026
I made a video to promote the Philosophy of Mind & Embodied Cognition MA programme at UCD, of which I’m the Director. (Also, apparently this is what I look like now! 😳) www.youtube.com/watch?v=wudT... #PhilMind #EmbodiedCognition
youtube.com
MA in Philosophy of Mind & Embodied Cognition- UCD School of Philosophy
YouTube video by UCD College of Social Sciences & Law
3309
Reposted by Marek
Ellie @ellienchanted.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
"This is really the moment where we need our men to be as horrified and as sickened as us," Pugh continued. "You need to be leading conversations about how we change the allowance and complicity of this behaviour as much as we are. How can you expect us to trust that it's 'not all men' when in moments like this, many of you stay quiet?”
014
Reposted by Marek
Dr Abeba Birhane @abeba.blacksky.app · 29/09/2026
unsolicited brag: dug into the data -> ai -> surveillance pipeline in class this morning and received a standing ovation at the end of class. genuinely did not expect it. now i’m in tears. first time for everything
1634042
Reposted by Marek
Anthony Moser @anthonymoser.com · 21/09/2026
10. if you are defining a process by what it produces, and i am defining a process by how it changes me, we are not talking about the same thing 11. arguing about what tasks LLMs can or cannot do keeps LLMs at the center of the conversation
321226
Reposted by Marek
Anthony Moser @anthonymoser.com · 21/09/2026
12. it is usually better to focus on people, and why people are doing things a) why are tech CEOs saying these things? b) why are bosses so excited about it? c) why do we write, draw, and make art? d) what is the fucking point?
629154
Reposted by Marek
Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 28/09/2026
"The findings indicate that another form of openness is possible, but only if it is approached as commons’ stewardship rather than indiscriminate release into proprietary systems." New article by Katja Mayer on the relationship between AI and open science.
cambridge.org
AI, open science, and the extraction imperative: A situated approach to the normativities of open research data | Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society | Cambridge Core
AI, open science, and the extraction imperative: A situated approach to the normativities of open research data - Volume 2
1102
Reposted by Marek
Dr Katie Twomey @k2mey.eurosky.social · 28/09/2026
This is quite cool. My university is the first organisation in the world to force Microsoft to allow us to turn off copilot summaries in Word 365, after a backlash against it from staff (including, very vocally, me). That cannot have been easy for our heroic IT people so hats very much off to them!
895441936
Reposted by Marek
Colette Delawalla, PhD @cdelawalla.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
The humanities have been calling out genAI theft since the jump, while STEM has rallied around “discovery potential”. I am *ONCE AGAIN* reminding EVERYONE that science is not the sacred cow, STEM isn’t the exception. They are going to steal our IP, too. We aren’t special.
8371150
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
I don’t think that this should just be shrugged off. One of our Ministers (Enterprise or Justice, probably) has presented this plan. It isn’t an anonymous creature called the Irish Presidency. That is our Government.
612770
Reposted by Marek
Dorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Elon Musk, FRS. Royal Society justify not booting him out because, after all, Isaac Newton wasn’t a nice person. And yes, he was doing exactly these things in summer of 2024 when @royalsociety.org first reconsidered his fellowship
05117
Reposted by Marek
Noreen Dalton 🌱🍉 @nordaltsee.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
How things start
24415
Reposted by Marek
Ed Baggs @edbaggs.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
Dimensions of Radical Embodiment returns next year with DRE4 at the University of Bristol! July 26-27, 2027 Deadline for submissions January 11 sites.google.com/view/dre-4-b...
sites.google.com
Dimensions of Radical Embodiment 4
The 4th instalment of the Dimensions of Radical Embodiment Conference series will take place at the University of Bristol on 26-27th July 2027. The conference focuses on Radical Embodied Cognition, E...
062
Reposted by Marek
Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 27/09/2026
It's just so bloody lazy. There are lots of people out there working on improving peer review in careful and productive ways, but the discourse is entirely about whether commercial LLMs can "do it".
193
Reposted by Marek
Paul Smaldino @psmaldino.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
I just gave a talk on interdisciplinary yesterday that features a call for interdisciplinary people and not just diverse teams of disciplinary types. Today I read this essay with delight. Viva antedisciplinarity. journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol...
journals.plos.org
“Antedisciplinary” Science
15913
Reposted by Marek
Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 27/09/2026
One of the worst things about the current moment is the complete lack of imagination associated with "can AI do it?" Why not make peer review a social process that's less arbitrary and gatekeeping but generative and conversational?
chronicle.com
Opinion | Could AI Be Better at Peer Review Than Humans?
A journal editor weighs the pros and cons.
2298
Reposted by Marek
Alan Dunne @aldunne.eurosky.social · 26/09/2026
in case Irish people don't know the context, Stan Cullis played for and managed Wolverhampton Wanderers. in 1938 he objected to a proposed Nazi salute by 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 players before a game vs 🇩🇪 and was dropped from the side. he's a club legend at Wolves, the Stan Cullis Stand was where I sat last weekend
110037
Reposted by Marek
Ursula K. Le Guin Bot @leguinbot.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
All too often the heroes of such fantasies behave exactly as the villains do, acting with mindless violence, but the hero is on the “right” side and therefore will win. Right makes might.
05116
Reposted by Marek
Luke LeBrun @lukelebrun.ca · 26/09/2026
Tech companies suddenly decide they can, in fact, moderate content on their platforms after all
7359792004
Reposted by Marek
Dr. Damien P. Williams, dread portent down from a mountain cave @wolven.blacksky.app · 26/09/2026
Damn. With the alt text:
The incident fits a broader pattern in the discourse around 'free speech' and 'cancel culture': 
[Section highlighted]
whatever comes from the top down is freedom; whatever comes from the bottom up is bullying and censorship.
[End highlight]
When Macklemore is dropped at the behest of the billionaire stadium owner Robert Kraft, it's an exercise of the freedom of businesses to 'demonstrate their values' by deciding whom to platform. But when Ed Sheeran's fans decide not to buy tickets to his performances, or even demand refunds, it's bullying, mob behaviour. Since most people are not billionaires and do not own stadiums, they can exercise meaningful power only collectively. The collective exercise of power must therefore be demonised.
3226111
Reposted by Marek
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 26/09/2026
Haiku for the tech press.
You stupid scarecrow
Under your very stick-feet
Birds are staling beans! 

Yayu
116020
Reposted by Marek
M Meerkat @kackbro.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Absofreakinlutely 💯% True......
276189444933
Reposted by Marek
Dermot Lynott @dermotlynott.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
One of my favourite typos was from the cover page of a student's coursework a few years back
Word cunt: 2050
1716923
Reposted by Marek
Dr. Aaron Thierry @thierryaaron.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
1/ People keep saying AI is inevitable. History disagrees. Plenty of technologies were called unstoppable, and societies stopped them or shrank them down to a niche. A thread 🧵
evitable
adjective
uk  /ˈev.ɪ.tə.bəl/ us  /ˈev.ə.t̬ə.bəl/

able to be avoided or prevented:
He believes that world war is evitable.
Inevitable suffering due to persecution is to be distinguished from evitable sickness.
3312153
Reposted by Marek
uɐʅ∀ (𝙻𝚒𝚔𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚂𝚌𝚊𝚖) @alanbutler.info · 25/09/2026
I was googling for 3d printer filament today and the results popped up these guys. 3d printed cookie cutter shapes. amazon is selling 100s of different ones. it's probably someone's little business. HOWEVER: PSA: DO NOT USE 3D PRINTED PLASTICS TO STORE, CUT, OR CONNECT WITH FOOD. EVER.
296
Reposted by Marek
Gary Davies (not a DJ or a Rev) @propanegary.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
If you'd like more background to the film the Met Office have a good page with lots of information... www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who...
metoffice.gov.uk
D-Day - the most important weather forecast in history
Find out how the Met Office played a crucial role in the timing of D-Day that became known as the largest amphibious invasion in military history, and how our services to the armed forces has evolved ...
02911
Reposted by Marek
TW @twesq.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
this is fantastic and I learned something new
562862426
Reposted by Marek
Dr Abeba Birhane @abeba.blacksky.app · 24/09/2026
over the past few weeks several AI evaluation/cybersecurity experts have explained how what's happening is a result of human incompetence rather than "AI going rogue". I'm begging the media to show a shred of journalistic integrity and stop parroting what altman or amodei say
6437521482
Reposted by Marek
Tressie McMillan Cottom @tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
I like this notetaking example. it is a good case of how gender works. Notetaking has never been about producing a transcript. It is a bureaucratic skill in the 20th c. organixarion because it is SENSEMAKING. Those women socialized to take notes? They have been doing men’s metacognition for them
232986736
Reposted by Marek
Leah McElrath @leahmcelrath.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
AP Stylebook warns against anthropomorphizing AI systems: “Avoid language that gives them human characteristics… Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it.”
APStylebook @APStylebook
X.com
Artificial intelligence systems do not think, feel, want or understand. Avoid language that gives them human characteristics. This is called anthropomorphizing, when we ascribe human traits, emotions or behaviors to non-human things, such as animals or inanimate objects.
Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it.
1970142264
Reposted by Marek
The Journal @thejournal.ie · 24/09/2026
The study also suggests that nearly 50,000 homes could have been built, or tens of thousands of jobs created across education, health or social sectors, if the resources used to expand data centres were directed elsewhere. jrnl.ie/7165266t
jrnl.ie
Government report on data centres was 'flawed' and 'exaggerated', new research claims
The study also suggests that nearly 50,000 homes could have been built if the resources in the data centre build-out were directed elsewhere.
33424
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Amongst innumerable absurdities, up front it claimed that “876,000 jobs (32% of national employment)” was “underpinned” by Ireland’s 72 data centres. But at the same time, in the appendix, it acknowledged that their ongoing employment contribution was 9,500 jobs. enterprise.gov.ie/en/publicati...


2010
2020 (peak construction)
2030

Jobs
Capex
1,800
26,300
-

Opex
700
5,600
9,500

Total
2,500
31,900
9,500

Wages (€m)
Capex
76
1,118
-

Opex
37
295
504

Total
113
1,413
504
1124
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Faced with energy prices soaring and data centres eating up over a fifth of all the juice in the country, the Govt paid KPMG €100k for a report which made such absurd claims about the employment dependant on them that it could have just been published as an appendix to Mr Frankfurt’s On Bullshit.
1126
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Yesterday, as well, noyb, the Max Schrems-led group in Austria revealed that the Irish Government had proposed that the rights of big AI companies to collect data on people should be recognised as a higher right that human’s data protection rights. They didn’t lie to us about it. They didn’t bother
2158
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
It doesn’t matter that they also have already announced a plan to require a PSC/MyGovID enrolment for the EU’s Digital Wallet plan. The Minister didn’t care if you believed them. They just said whatever for the form of it and then ploughed on.
1113
Reposted by Marek
Simon McGarr @tupped.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
And here, our Government has, in the last year, taken a harder and harder turn towards Bullshitting as it simply does as it pleases and says whatever, with the two increasingly uncoupled. Yesterday they had a Minister again claiming the PSC becoming an ID card was voluntary.
1165
Reposted by Marek
Centre for the Sciences of Place and Memory @memoryplace.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Jeff Malpas at Stirling, discussing why space and place matter. Conversations like this sit at the heart of the Centre for the Sciences of Place and Memory. NEXT Seth Dias on Redfern, Aboriginal Black Power Wed 30 Sep | 11amUK | online Register: forms.gle/U88c9QQ1CJFf... youtube.com/shorts/NycQL...
youtube.com
Malpas video
YouTube video by Centre for the Sciences of Place and Memory
041