Sign in

Ken Halvorsen

@halvorsenlab.bsky.social
242 followers 168 following 89 posts

Mostly posting science from our lab at RNA Institute, UAlbany.

PostsRepliesMedia
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
submitted a grant, a paper revision, and article proofs and got to inbox zero - beyond ready for vacation
000
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
This approach definitely got me through grad school. If I did half the stuff I agreed to do I'd still be working on my PhD
000
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
NIH grants have been under political scrutiny since early 2025. But what does the screening process actually look like? What is being flagged? I spent a month digging into leaked docs and emails. We've published the 235-word list that are being flagged by an internal AI tool. And so much more. 🧵
nature.com
Inside the new political screening that’s stalling NIH grants
Mandatory reviews by top health officials and checks for 235 disfavoured terms have left hundreds of vetted grant applications in administrative limbo.
9541384
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
Wow crazy
000
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 06/06/2026
Amazing work on this. Seems fair to assume it's all faked at this point...
011
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Reese Richardson @reeserichardson.bsky.social · 05/06/2026
The Thermo Fisher situation keeps getting worse. We've now collected 450+ problematic images presented as verification data in TF's antibody catalog. This includes: 🖌️ Dozens more images with duplications or painting 🖨️ Hundreds of blots that all share the same background (behold slideshow below)
18590367
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Daniel Gorelick @danielgorelick.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
Paying peer reviewers works. Expanded Fast & Fair experiment @biologyopen.bsky.social: • 5.5 vs 37.7 working days to decision with reviews • ~3 vs ~9 reviewer invitations per manuscript • no reduction in editor-assessed review quality • similar acceptance rates www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Scatter plot showing that Fast & Fair peer review reached first decision with reviews much faster than conventional peer review: mean 5.5 versus 37.7 working days. Most Fast & Fair manuscripts met the 7-working-day target, while conventional manuscripts were slower and more variable, up to 116 working days.
8232117
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Katie Mack @astrokatie.com · 29/05/2026
It’s truly astonishing to see how comprehensively the US government is tearing down every part of the system that has made it up until now a world-leading power in science, research, and technological development. The entire world will suffer from this wanton destruction.
23980462824
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 29/05/2026
Of all the harm this administration has done to US science, today's proposed changes to the way federal grants are awarded and administered is the most damaging yet. The text of the federal register document is impenetrably tedious by design, so here's an excellent summary of what it says.
331658977
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.net · 28/05/2026
🚨UPDATE: We will launch our action center on this issue tomorrow. 📣JOIN US: Emergency Science Meeting (Virtual) June 2nd at 4pm et. Details to come. Our Policy Team has read through the entire 400 page hot mess express from Russ Vought...here are the high level details. A Thread🧵 1/x
8489235
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Jeremy Berg @jeremymberg.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
So... I got more information about this plan. The most important points follow on the next posts. 1/3
A slide with recommendations about peer review scores.
77776
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
BWJones @bwjones.bsky.social · 25/05/2026
NIH funded peeps: This is insane and coming for us.
For FY 2026 RPPRs:
If there are any publications with a foreign co-author, a statement submitted through the Signing Official (SO) confirming the author will no longer publish or collaborate with the foreign partner is sufficient to show the collaboration has ended. Also indicate that no IDeA money was transferred via subcontract to an institution in a foreign country. This path will minimize delays.For FY2027 RPPRs onward:
Pls are required to submit prior approval requests for any publication co-authored with individual(s) affiliated with a foreign institution(s).
Per NOT-OD-26-026, prior approval requests must be initiated and submitted by a SO for the recipient organization.
In addition to noting the foreign site and the name of the foreign investigator, the prior approval request should provide information about the nature of the research being conducted; why the involvement of the foreign site is necessary; and whether any data will be transferred.
45365177
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 22/05/2026
There’s only one correct answer to a request like this and it’s “get fucked.” I realize that most individual investigators are not in a position to respond this way, but isolationism as a condition of funding will destroy US science even faster than a dearth of funding will.
830338
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
My MIRA renewal application is submitted. Finally I can enjoy 6 months of general unease before learning whether my lab will continue to exist
030
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Sholto David @sholtodavid.bsky.social · 17/05/2026
Surprised to discover that Thermo Fisher appears to show a fake western blot for the validation of one of their p53 antibodies. I've added a diagram to show the very similar bands. This does not appear to be one of the "published figures" but their own internal data.
22272114
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Excited to share our new preprint (www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...), integrating aptamer based sensing into our DNA nanoswitch platform for protein detection. The project almost died about 4 times, and it's nice to see 10 yrs of back burner simmering coming out fully baked. @arunrichard.bsky.social
Design of a dual detecting DNA nanoswitch where aptamer binding of a protein target causes a loop of a specific size to form.  When read on gel electrophoresis, two proteins can be detected simultaneously, in this case VEGF producing a large loop and thrombin producing a smaller loop.
011
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Scott Delaney @scott-delaney.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
In August, Jay Bhattacharya said “Training future biomedical scientists” was the 1st priority for his version of NIH. But talk is cheap. Let’s see how JB’s doing. 🤔 NIH supports trainees mostly via fellowship (F), training (T), and career development (K) awards. Here are funding curves for each.🧵
411682
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
I'm very excited about this new preprint on our work (www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...). We re-engineered gel electrophoresis for our DNA-base biosensors and came up with a 3D printed mini-gel, complete with electrodes. short thread...
images of a conventional gel box and 3D printed mini boxes with resulting gel band images
100
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 24/01/2026
New preprint from our lab, really exited about this one and may post more about it later this weekend
000
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
WesleyWongLab @wesleywonglab.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
Our light guided molecular patterning method for high-throughput single-molecule studies just published today in Small! Programmable, covalent, multiplexed, accessible. doi.org/10.1002/smll...
doi.org
Light‐Guided Molecular Patterning for High‐Throughput Single‐Molecule Mechanical Characterization
A light-guided molecular patterning method is presented for high-throughput single-molecule characterization. The approach enables scalable and accessible molecular patterning without specialized lit...
011
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
WesleyWongLab @wesleywonglab.bsky.social · 16/01/2026
What better way to start the year then with a deep dive into multiplexed force spectroscopy? It was a lot of fun putting this together with @halvorsenlab.bsky.social. Hope you check it out!
132
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
We've got ISSUES. Literally. We scraped >100k special issues & over 1 million articles to bring you a PISS-poor paper. We quantify just how many excess papers are published by guest editors abusing special issues to boost their CVs. How bad is it & what can we do? arxiv.org/abs/2601.07563 A 🧵 1/n
17514314
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 05/01/2026
Starting the new year with a review article! (with @wesleywonglab.bsky.social) This feels like a pretty big accomplishment. I remember how much I relied on annual reviews as a grad student to dive into a subject, so its surreal to be on the other side... www.annualreviews.org/content/jour...
annualreviews.org
Beyond the Single Molecule: Multiplexed Methods in Force Spectroscopy
Single-molecule techniques have transformed biological research by enabling direct observation and manipulation of individual molecules. These methods overcome ensemble averaging inherent in bulk meas...
120
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Faine Greenwood @faineg.com · 21/12/2025
suspect a big reason why many academics and others who work in areas where getting facts RIGHT is key are disinterested in using LLMs for research: they’ve tried it, they keep noticing major errors in output, and they conclude that having to verify all that doesn’t actually save them time.
1073186613
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 19/12/2025
I may be reading this wrong, but there seems to be conflict between the PAR-26-121 instructions and new biosketch instructions. In particular the "contributions to science" which MIRA calls for with citations and new biosketch which doesn't allow citations. Anybody resolved this yet?
100
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Jeremy Yoder says no war @jbyoder.org · 17/12/2025
imagining a NSF PO handing a VC bro the stack of 10-to-15 proposals they'll have to be ready to discuss, then explaining that they'll be paid $600 for the three days of the panel meeting
43511
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Colette Delawalla, PhD @cdelawalla.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
Excited to be featured in this @cenmag.bsky.social piece with @standupforscience.bsky.social friend @jeremymberg.bsky.social ❤️✊ cen.acs.org/policy/nih-n...
cen.acs.org
‘A huge rupture in everything’: US science faced major upheaval in 2025
Amid enormous shifts, many scientists pushed back and risked dismissal from their jobs even as federal agencies fired thousands of employees
06820
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
Christmas came early! New science toy from @lumicks.bsky.social for @thernainstitute.bsky.social - very excited to get this all set up and operational.
large crates packed with science equipment
062
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
Our latest lab paper (and last for @jibinpunnoose.bsky.social) is out! We look at strand polarity in base stacking interactions, with single-molecule measurements and MD simulations with collaborators in Chen and Vangaveti labs @thernainstitute.bsky.social pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...
pubs.acs.org
Investigating Polarity Effects in DNA Base Stacking
Nucleic acid structures are stabilized by both base pairing and base stacking. While energetics of base pairing interactions are relatively well established, our understanding of the energetic contributions of base stacking remain incomplete. Here, we use a combination of single-molecule and computational biophysics approaches to investigate the effect of strand polarity on base-stacking energetics. We designed pairs of DNA constructs with reversed stacking polarities at nick sites, along with corresponding no-stack controls to isolate stacking contributions. Performing single-molecule force-clamp assays with a Centrifuge Force Microscope (CFM), we observed polarity-dependent differences in stacking energetics. These differences were most pronounced in purine–purine and certain purine–pyrimidine interactions. Notably, a 5′ purine stacked on a 3′ pyrimidine was generally more stable than the reverse polarity. We employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to observe stacking interfaces in the DNA constructs. The simulations were qualitatively consistent with our experiments, and showed positional differences between opposite polarity stacking pairs, giving some insight into the origin of these polarity differences. Overall, these results demonstrate that base polarity can modulate stacking stability and should be considered when designing short duplex regions such as overhangs in molecular biology and biotechnology applications.
183
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Feral T. Robot, Oil Swamp Utility Bot #7629 @feralrobots.bsky.social · 27/11/2025
Hey @nature.com, have you got an explanation for how the hell THIS happened? & especially why you accepted a paper with such a bizarre piece of genAI slop in it?! & more to the point, why we should take you seriously at all going forward? www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Figure 1 from a paper published in Nature (linked in post). The figure purports to be an infographic depiction of the "Overall working of the framework" for 'explainably' diagnosing autism spectrum disorder. The infographic is plainly nonsense, containing many spelling errors, nonsense words, meaningless images and graphs. Clearly created using generative AI and (crucially) NEVER CHECKED AT ANY STEP OF THE WRITING OR PUBLICATION PROCESS.
741281341
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Will Ratcliff @wcratcliff.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
Dang, hard disagree. The best papers to write and read are works of art, not merely a list of data and statements. Don’t let LLMs take this away too, for gods sake.
1326443
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
UAlbany News @ualbanynews.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
ICYMI: #UAlbany's Life Sciences Research Building will get a $50M state-funded expansion to support The RNA Institute. The funding will advance the Institute's research, training & workforce development, including its use of AI to guide drug discovery. www.albany.edu/news-center/...
albany.edu
Gov. Hochul Announces $50M Life Sciences Expansion for RNA Institute research
The Life Sciences Research Building, which is home to cutting-edge labs where researchers from the RNA Institute blend bench science with AI to help accelerate the development of RNA-based treatments ...
021
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Erik Poppleton @poppleton.phd · 26/09/2025
Some really nice fundamental biophysics of DNA base stacking 🧬!
021
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 26/09/2025
Well, it's been a minute but we have a new preprint to share! Final project in our lab by @jibinpunnoose.bsky.social, investigating strand polarity in base stacking. We measured experimentally with centrifuge force microscope and computationally with MD. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
241
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
arunrichard.bsky.social @arunrichard.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
New editorial by Madhan Barathraj and me, discussing DNA nanostructures for nucleic acid delivery, is now online at Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
DNA nanocarriers for nucleic acid drug delivery
Published in Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (Ahead of Print, 2025)
011
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 23/08/2025
Yesterday we bid farewell to Jibin, who has been in the lab for 7 years and is starting as Assistant professor of chemistry at SUNY New Paltz. Congrats and best wishes - we were so fortunate to have you in the lab.
120
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Maureen Barr @barrlab.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
We need a new microscope objective. A $1.6k tariff for something that you can hold in your hand and that is only manufactured in Germany
Quote for a 63x objective. The objective is $12,784. The tariff is $1,661.92Zeiss 63x objective
1917561
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
NEW: In an unprecedented move, the NIH will soon disinvite dozens of scientists about to take positions on advisory councils that make final decisions on grant funding. NIH staff were told to select others aligned with the Trump administration and told to expect placements by political appointees.
nature.com
Exclusive: NIH to dismiss dozens of grant reviewers to align with Trump priorities
The move would undo years of work, leaving advisory councils understaffed, and without the full expertise needed for reviews.
441033780
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 10/07/2025
This is so sad...plus I'm all in on science, there is no plan B
000
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Mark Peifer (He, him) @peiferlabunc.bsky.social · 12/06/2025
Join the 22,339 people who have joined to support our NIH colleagues. Let's get this to 50,000 RT
04738
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Tal Nuriel, PhD @talnuriel.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
Announcing an official fundraising campaign to support my lab’s research on APOE4 and Alzheimer’s disease: joinus.cuimc.columbia.edu/participant/.... This campaign is itself an experiment of sorts. But mostly, it's an attempt to save my lab during an unprecedented time of turmoil in academia. 1/9
33727
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Dr. Kat Napaaqtuk❄️ @napaaqtuk.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
For non-scientists: the funding rate is somewhere between 7% to ~25% (rare) for NIH or NSF grants, depending on where you are applying. Grants are reviewed by a panel of peers who read the grants, score them, then debate the ratings for 1-2 days to rank them. It is INCREDIBLY competitive already.
6239105
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
🚨 NIH director Jayanta Bhattacharya is testifying before the US Senate Appropriations Committee today. The hearing is bound to be spicy, after more than 300 agency staff wrote him a letter decrying his leadership and actions as director. 🔥 I'll be live-posting the hearing, so follow along here.
7335105
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Denis Wirtz @deniswirtz.bsky.social · 09/06/2025
The NIH has not issued a single new call for proposals since the end of January.
212151
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Science Magazine @science.org · 09/06/2025
Breaking news: Staff at the National Institutes of Health have issued a declaration calling on their director to depoliticize the agency and reverse spending cuts.
scim.ag
NIH staff and biomedical community sound alarm about agency politicization, funding slowdown
In test of NIH director’s support of dissent, NIH staff sign Bethesda Declaration urging reversal of grant cuts and freezes
9403159
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Benjamin Riley @benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 07/06/2025
Let's have some fun. In this NYT story, we see a picture of an OpenAI billboard on a college campus, suggesting the following prompt: "Give me a guide for mastering this Calc 101 syllabus. In two weeks. Small steps please." What happens when we actually use ChatGPT to do this? THREAD!
13643255
Ken Halvorsen @halvorsenlab.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
uh-huh, LMK when its working so I can retire
000
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Eric Topol @erictopol.bsky.social · 31/05/2025
"If the proposal is enacted, Americans today and tomorrow will be sicker, poorer, and die younger” an $18 Billion cut Only 3 NIH Institutes will remain in place, and even they will have their funds markedly reduced www.statnews.com/2025/05/30/n...
26724370
Reposted by Ken Halvorsen
Charles Ornstein @charlesornstein.bsky.social · 27/05/2025
A Harvard scientist built a database of 2,100 NIH grant terminations. Then his own funding was cut, via @statnews.com
statnews.com
A Harvard scientist built a database of 2,100 NIH grant terminations. Then his own funding was cut
Harvard's Scott Delaney helped build a database of NIH grant terminations that is being used in litigation against the Trump administration.
6417165