Sign in

Er-Te Zheng

@ertezheng.bsky.social
172 followers 360 following 57 posts

PhD researcher at University of Sheffield | Computational Social Science, Science of Science, Scientometrics, Social Media Metrics, Research Integrity

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Altmetric @altmetric.com · 24/08/2026
🧵 (Part 1) Science is Not Just for Scientists In a few short years we have seen the rise of scammers, quacks, unlettered politicians assuming critical health infrastructure roles (with predictably devastating results) and more. Should "Science" just be for scientists? 1/25
A large collage of notable scientists including Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Nikola Tesla and Albert Einstein.
42114
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
finally
110
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Nature @nature.com · 10/08/2026
A growing number of private firms are offering researchers artificial-intelligence tools for scrutinizing manuscripts before publication go.nature.com/4wSqQgQ
go.nature.com
This AI tool claims to pick the top 1% of preprints. Should researchers trust it?
QED Science says that its metrics reduce bias by assessing papers solely on the basis of their originality and validity.
0167
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 08/08/2026
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (2026) considers "unanticipated ignorance" in science. "It is an ignorance that we did not know about, one that we were not able to guess unless experimentation confronted us with it." doi.org/10.1007/978-...
Abstract My paper will explore the function of ignorance and error in the scientific research process. Scientific knowledge, as a particular form among many other forms of knowledge, can even be characterized by its attitude toward ignorance and error. The ground-laying epistemic feature of research consists in gaining knowledge about aspects of the world of which the actual knowledge is either scarce or absent altogether. “Specified ignorance,” as discussed by Robert Merton, is a state of affairs where the black spot of ignorance can be pinpointed. But research is also characterized by a kind of ignorance that we can address as “unspecified,” or “nonanticipated,” that is, by ignoring what one does not know. This often implies that what counts as knowledge today will reveal itself tomorrow as an error of the past. I will especially focus on the latter form of ignorance and present a few historical examples from the life sciences of the twentieth century.
2315
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Nature @nature.com · 31/07/2026
Scientists who use large language models (LLMs) to help them with their research will spend less time refining their work and instead jump quickly to fresh projects, according to a modelling study. go.nature.com/451DgXl
go.nature.com
Scientists using LLMs will ‘do more, less well’, modelling study predicts
Research suggests that the combination of incentives to publish and the use of large language models will lead to more papers, but they will be less refined.
25415
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Just had an idea to study how AI affects the size of scientific teams, only to find that so many papers have already explored it 🤣 Academia is getting way too competitive 😅 arxiv.org/abs/2607.10780 arxiv.org/abs/2605.27404 arxiv.org/abs/2603.01718
arxiv.org
Return of the solo author: The changing division of labor in science in the age of generative AI
Modern science has experienced a long shift from individual work to team production. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) might appear to extend this trajectory by lowering research costs and enabl...
010
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Stephen Turner @stephenturner.us · 29/07/2026
cnsplots: Publication-Ready Scientific Plots for Cell, Nature, and Science Journals github.com/faridrashidi... really cool work here from a postdoc at NIH.
github.com
GitHub - faridrashidi/cnsplots: 🎨 Toolkit for generating publication-quality plots for Cell, Nature and Science journals
🎨 Toolkit for generating publication-quality plots for Cell, Nature and Science journals - faridrashidi/cnsplots
12911
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Digital Science @digital-science.com · 23/07/2026
🎉 Digital Science congratulates all participants in the NIH S-index Challenge! Our CEO, Dr Daniel Hook, says it has been “an honour and a privilege” to participate as a member of one of the top teams in the Challenge. The team developed a new metric for measuring the impact of data sharing.
021
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Altmetric @altmetric.com · 22/07/2026
💥 Open Science Festival 2027 Bamberg call for abstracts is out! This is a great event, we will very likely be there.
062
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Richard Van Noorden @richvn.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
On US-China research collaboration: The number of papers funded by NSF/NIH/DOE that have China+US co-authors has dropped about 40% since peak in 2020. From @dangaristo.bsky.social analysis in @nature.com of US political push to further restrict collabs with China. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
1115
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Stephen Turner @stephenturner.us · 14/07/2026
"The journal is a seventeenth-century technology asked to do four modern jobs at once: disseminate results, certify their quality, allocate scholarly attention, and confer career credit. It does none of them well." arxiv.org/abs/2607.05454
arxiv.org
Publishing Without Journals: An Open, Forkable Archive with Attributed Review
The journal is a seventeenth-century technology asked to do four modern jobs at once: disseminate results, certify their quality, allocate scholarly attention, and confer career credit. It does none o...
0155
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Nature @nature.com · 10/07/2026
General purpose AI tools for science, such as Claude Science, promise to accelerate research. But which is right for you? go.nature.com/4h5EBnc
go.nature.com
Which ‘AI scientist’ suits your lab? A guide for the perplexed
General purpose AI tools for science, such as Claude Science, promise to accelerate research. But which is right for you?
1146
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
JMIR Publications @jmirpub.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
An estimated US$228 billion in biomedical research funding may be wasted every year.JMIR Metascience and Research Integrity is now accepting submissions for its first call for papers in its new section on Waste in Research. Submit your research today: metascience.jmir.org/announcements/…
011
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
José Luis Ortega @joseluisortega.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
"The role of altmetrics in citation emergence: a temporal approach" is our new preprint available in @socarxiv.bsky.social. Tracking the appearance of altmetric through the time, we have found that social media trigger the appearance of citations and shorten the time it takes for them to occur.
153
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
With AI tools like Claude Science, data-rich fields may soon see a huge surface-level boom. If the data are easy to access, AI can now clean, model, visualize, and write up analyses very fast. This may make database-driven quantitative papers much cheaper and easier to produce at scale.
420
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Altmetric @altmetric.com · 01/07/2026
Tune in on the 23rd July, where we talk about the role of sentiment analysis in research evaluation. @culturebullet.com is co-panelist with Charlie Rapple of @growkudos.bsky.social and @thatandream.com.
052
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
ArXiv Paper Poster (cs.SI & ph-soc) @soc-net-bot.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Should children follow their parents' research paths? Intergenerational research continuity and divergence in academic families arxiv.org/abs/2606.29488 How academic advantages are transmitted within families is usually studied as occupational inheritance, but it is not clear whether ...📈🤖
011
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Stephen Turner @stephenturner.us · 30/06/2026
I getting a pre-submission peer review on a manuscript is a great use for AI. You don't need a third-party tool. GPT-5.x and Opus 4.x are good, and open/community development of these skills/harnesses is the way. I wrote a Claude skill wrapping the Consensus MCP to do this. doi.org/10.59350/b35...
5213
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
ASIS&T SIG/MET @asistsigmet.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
Deadline Extended: METSTI 2026 The submission deadline for the ASIS&T METSTI Annual Symposium on Informetric, Scientometric, Scientific and Technical Information Research has been extended to June 25, 2026. We welcome your submissions and look forward to seeing you in Bangkok, Nov 6–10, 2026!
011
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Nicholas A. Christakis @nachristakis.bsky.social · 13/06/2026
Even in Denmark, with its excellent provisions for children, parenthood marks a sharp divergence in academic careers (from employment to tenure to publications) for men and women -- for a variety of reasons reflecting both structure and agency. opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/f...
22512
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Elisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
‘Student Geng’ ignites research-integrity scandal in China after calling out senior academics Video blogger’s viral accusations of data manipulation in Nature journals have sparked intense debate and speedy institutional investigations. By Xiaoying You www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
‘Student Geng’ ignites research-integrity scandal in China after calling out senior academics
Video blogger’s viral accusations of data manipulation in Nature journals have sparked intense debate and speedy institutional investigations.
15212
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
We developed a similar tool to decide which papers are trustworthy retractionrisk.com
122
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Katherine Stiles @katherinestiles.org · 10/06/2026
· #AcademicSky · #ResearchIntegrity · #ScientificMisconduct · “Problems [Geng Hongwei] has identified in nine papers published in Springer Nature journals have triggered numerous official investigations and the dismissal of several high-ranking academics.”
science.org
Misconduct sleuth in China swiftly gains acclaim for calling out questionable papers
Independent vlogger Geng Hongwei galvanizes often-sluggish institutions to investigate and punish prominent scientists
093
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Alan McElligott @amcell.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
2026. AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
pnas.org
AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science | PNAS
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are transforming how scientists conduct and validate research, offering promise as tools to improve sc...
062
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Nature @nature.com · 02/06/2026
Prediction markets such as Polymarket and Kalshi have soared in popularity over the past few months. But how do their prediction powers compare with the opinions of subject-matter experts? go.nature.com/4fi6fg1
go.nature.com
Can Polymarket predict the progress of science, or are subject-experts better?
Online prediction markets are taking bets on everything from climate change to quantum computing. But researchers question their accuracy.
0144
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Jennifer Byrne @jabyrnesci.bsky.social · 01/06/2026
New @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social preprint led by @pranujanp.bsky.social, studying errors such as incorrect primer sequences and contaminated #CellLines in #circRNA papers in high impact factor journals. We found reagent errors in 51% of n=118 circRNA papers in high IF journals in 2022 (1/4)🧪
biorxiv.org
1107
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Digital Science @digital-science.com · 28/05/2026
Register now to join "The science sleuths: Decoding the findings of the FoSci 2026 Report." #ResearchIntegrity Expert insights into data-driven methods in uncovering research misconduct and manipulation. 🗓️ Thursday 11 June, 3pm BST 10am EDT 🔗 Reserve your spot: ow.ly/Y0xn50Z55AW
034
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Chris Brunet @chrisbrunet.skystack.xyz · 28/04/2026
Third Editor Fired in Elsevier's Citation Cartel Crackdown; Hundreds of Papers At Risk of Retraction • "This is not a series of coincidences; it is a blatant, industrial-scale quid pro quo."
chrisbrunet.com
Third Editor Fired in Elsevier's Citation Cartel Crackdown; Hundreds of Papers At Risk of Retraction
"This is not a series of coincidences; it is a blatant, industrial-scale quid pro quo."
012
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Retraction Watch @retractionwatch.com · 20/05/2026
In which the Retraction Watch Database makes it into the Harper's Index. harpers.org/harpers-inde...
1457
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Elisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
New on ScienceIntegrityDigest: My report from the 2026 World Conference on Research Integrity in Vancouver. If you could not make it, there are links to all my BlueSky live posts from the sessions I attended. #WCRI2026 Read the report here: scienceintegritydigest.com/2026/05/20/r...
scienceintegritydigest.com
Reporting from the 2026 World Conference on Research Integrity
Early May, I attended the 2026 World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI) in Vancouver, BC, Canada. This conference is held every two years. In 2024, I went to the WCRI in Athens, Greece, and in…
13312
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
U.S. researchers who coauthor research papers with scientists affiliated with foreign institutions are drawing fresh scrutiny from NIH, NASA. #scientificpublishing @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
U.S. researchers face new restrictions on publishing with foreign collaborators
NIH, NASA grantees are confused and concerned amid agencies’ piecemeal communication
23623
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
In contrast, "good practice" in academic citations (acknowledging paper’s retraction status) is only ~5%, far lower than on Bluesky. doi.org/10.1162/qss_...
Abstract
We present the first database-wide study on the citation contexts of retractedpapers, which covers 7,813 retracted papers indexed in PubMed, 169,434 citationscollected from iCite, and 48,134 citation contexts identified from the XML versionof the PubMed Central Open Access Subset. Compared with previous citationstudies that focused on comparing citation counts using two time frames (i.e.,preretraction and postretraction), our analyses show the longitudinal trends ofcitations to retracted papers in the past 60 years (1960-2020). Our temporalanalyses show that retracted papers continued to be cited, but that old retractedpapers stopped being cited as time progressed. Analysis of the text progressionof pre- and postretraction citation contexts shows that retraction did not changethe way the retracted papers were cited. Furthermore, among the 13,252postretraction citation contexts, only 722 (5.4%) citation contexts acknowledgedthe retraction. In these 722 citation contexts, the retracted papers were mostcommonly cited as related work or as an example of problematic science. Ourfindings deepen the understanding of why retraction does not stop citation anddemonstrate that the vast majority of postretraction citations in biomedicine donot document the retraction.
110
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Zen Faulkes @doctorzen.net · 13/05/2026
Retractions and other publisher responses to problem papers doesn't affect citations. www.medrxiv.org/content/10.6... Quick thread. 1. There's no sentiment analysis. People might cite flawed papers to say, "This is a flawed paper." 1/4
medrxiv.org
Publishers’ responses to integrity concerns – does the type of notice influence subsequent citations? A cohort study
Background Journals may respond to integrity concerns by publishing an editorial response (editorial notice, expression of concern (EoC) or retraction). We investigated whether the type of editorial r...
122
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
In our new paper of how Bluesky users discuss retracted papers, we found: ✅ 90% of Bluesky posts show "good practices" (flagging issues/retraction status) ❌ Only 10% show "bad practices" This highlights Bluesky's vital role in responsible science communication! arxiv.org/abs/2605.04334
5388
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Peter Tennant @pwgtennant.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Does engaging with the arts help to slow the aging process? According to this new paper from Fancourt et al the answer is yes! Alas, the paper is actually unsuitable for such claims. Let’s examine by discussing how you'd establish whether arts engagement actually caused future health! 1/18 🧵
academic.oup.com
Does leisure activity matter for epigenetic ageing? Analyses of arts engagement and physical activity in the UK Household Longitudinal Study
AbstractBackground and Objectives. Over the past decade, ageing clocks have become widely adopted as important tools for understanding biological ageing an
813160
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Anna Abalkina @abalkina.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
#WCRI2026 is over. I would like to share the summary of several presentations on paper mills. abalkina.com/wcri-2026-pa... abalkina.com/wcri-2026-pa... Part 3 will be released soon.
abalkina.com
WCRI 2026 (Part 1) - Anna Abalkina
World Congress on Research Integrity 2026, for the first time, included dozens of presentations on paper mills, organizations that sell papers, co-authorship
0146
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Solal Pirelli @solalpirelli.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
Some personal news...
2194
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
IOP Publishing @ioppublishing.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
At World Conferences on Research Integrity in Vancouver, Lauren Flintoft (IOPP) unveiled a new in‑house tool to detect duplicate peer review reports. Analysing ~500k reviews, the session showed how technology and expert judgement can protect research quality. #ResearchIntegrity #WCRI2026 ✨
041
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Elisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
New report by @fosci.bsky.social : Forensic Scientometrics (FoSci) Report 2026: Understanding, Detecting, and Documenting Manipulation in the Research Ecosystem figshare.com/articles/onl...
figshare.com
Forensic Scientometrics (FoSci) Report 2026: Understanding, Detecting, and Documenting Manipulation in the Research Ecosystem
The FoSci Report 2026 establishes Forensic Scientometrics (FoSci) as a data-driven discipline dedicated to understanding, detecting, and documenting manipulation across the research ecosystem to strengthen scientific integrity. The field organizes its investigations into three interdependent levels: the micro level, which focuses on anomalies in individual papers; the meso level, which targets organized misconduct networks; and the macro level, which addresses systemic issues. The report provides contributions from experts across these topics, outlining methodologies, examples, and proposing a roadmap of solutions for publishers, institutions, and policymakers to combat the gradual undermining of science.
0176
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
EconStor @econstor.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
"Bluesky users generally demonstrate responsible practices when discussing retracted articles. Approximately 90% of scholarly posts on the platform reflect good practice in such discussions." 🙏 arxiv.org/pdf/2605.04334
arxiv.org
021
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Nicolas Guillas @nicolas-guillas.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
#Science Bluesky = X ? Les explications de @ertezheng.bsky.social @sheffielduni.bsky.social + @hvaloche.bsky.social @univbrest.bsky.social = mon article @ouest-france.fr www.ouest-france.fr/high-tech/re...
Er-Te Zheng
034
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Cédric Mas @cedricmas.eurosky.social · 07/05/2026
Petit à petit, le réseau Bluesky se place comme la référence en matière de réseau de diffusion des savoirs scientifiques. @ouest-france.fr en parle (article de @nicolas-guillas.bsky.social avec @ertezheng.bsky.social @sheffielduni.bsky.social @hvaloche.bsky.social et @univbrest.bsky.social ).
ouest-france.fr
Pour la diffusion des sciences, pourquoi le réseau Bluesky peut être l’égal de X
Le réseau social X (ex-Twitter) a été rejoint par Bluesky en matière de discussions entre chercheurs, révèle une étude.
725681
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Elisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Good morning from Vancouver, on Day 3 of the @wcrifoundation.bsky.social With Gengyan Tang, "Producing Papers, Fabricating Science: Paper Mills in China" Research on paper mills poses ethical challenges (undercover identity, data access challenges, legal constraints) #WCRI2026
Title slideSpeaker
1254
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Dalmeet Singh Chawla @dalmeet.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Paper mill content growing faster than legitimate research, according to study by @reeserichardson.bsky.social & colleagues — which @elisabethbik.bsky.social mentioned in her talk at #WCRI2026: cen.acs.org/policy/publi...
cen.acs.org
Brokers of scientific fraud growing rapidly, study finds
Publishers are not keeping up with paper mills and other purveyors of shoddy academic papers
13422
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 04/05/2026
Great starter pack! hope to be added
120
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
If you’re attending #WCRI2026 in Vancouver, I’d love for you to catch my pre! I’ll be exploring whether Bluesky users act more as public watchdogs or as spreaders of misinformation when discussing retracted papers. 6.C Oral Session May 6, 10:30 AM - 10:45 AM @wcrifoundation.bsky.social
141
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Mark Hooper @markhooper.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
If you’ll be at the World Conferences on Research Integrity, consider joining our pres, “Friendly Ghosts?”. We’ll discuss authorship dilemmas when contributors decline. Tuesday, 11.15am, Stream G. Me, Jennifer Wright, and Michael Vincent #WCRI2026 #researchintegrity @wcrifoundation.bsky.social
A picture of a friendly ghost. It's blushing and cute. A person's legs are sticking out the bottom of a big sheet. Text reads: "Friendly Ghosts? Ethical dilemmas when research contributors decline authorship. WCRI, Tuesday, 10:30 - 12:00, Stream G (Seymour).
0218
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Jed Brown @jedbrown.org · 01/05/2026
What do you call an 80-100% fabrication rate in scientific/professional work? I call it fraud or professional misconduct. Getting an incidentally correct response for the wrong reason is not demonstration of knowledge. Plagiarizing my colleagues is not knowledge. Construct validity is table stakes.
Figure 1: Definition and quantification of the mirage effect. a, We define a mirage as
an AI model describing visual features in the absence of any image input. The output of a
model affected by the mirage effect, seen in isolation, is indistinguishable from that of normal
visual reasoning. They both describe seen images and visual features without showing any signs
of uncertainty. b, We quantify the mirage effect in a multimodal AI model by measuring the
frequency of the model showing the effect across all the questions in a given category. The
questions are designed to ask specifically about an image input, common in that category,
without providing any images. c, We show consistently high rates of showing the mirage effect
across all the tested AI models. We observe that the average rate can be higher for the newest
versions of one model compared to the legacy ones, suggesting that continued training and
acquiring new skills can lead to unwanted behaviors in multimodal settings.
193
Er-Te Zheng @ertezheng.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Would love to see it!
000
Reposted by Er-Te Zheng
Colin Camerer @cfcamerer.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
NEW editorial contributed to a ew(ish) outlet for publishing replications, across a wide range of sciences ejournals.uni-muenster.de/replicationr...
073