Sign in

Trym Nohr Fjørtoft

@trymnf.com
169 followers 340 following 20 posts

associate professor of political science, Oslo Metropolitan University. trymnf.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 18/09/2026
I'm trying to write stuff for my blog every now and then. Today, a post about political masochism, where I try to take issue with the idea that if something feels wrong, it must be right. It's tempting and sometimes correct, but it's a very bad political principle. www.trymnf.com/blog/politic...
trymnf.com
Political Masochism
There’s something appealing about the idea that if something feels right, it’s got to be, at some deeper level, wrong. And the corollary: that if something feels wrong, it’s got to be right. I think t...
000
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 03/09/2026
Elena (@elenaescalanteb.bsky.social) and I have tried our hands at science and technology studies! In @sciasculture.bsky.social, we find that most media coverage treats antitrust regulation as a depoliticized, technical exercise. We think this fails against the emerging tech oligarchy.
Softening the oligarchy: the normalization of Big Tech power

Drive along the north shore of Long Island in New York, and you will see the spoils of America’s previous Gilded Age. Vast estates of hundreds or thousands of acres, with turreted castles and residences in the style of eighteenth-century English manor houses, the more modest houses containing thirty-two rooms and the roomier estates more than twice as many – a stark contrast to the crowded New York City nearby. In the words of Robert Caro,

The huddled masses of New York City had a (…) powerful enemy. It was wealth – vast, entrenched, impregnable wealth – and the power that went with it. For it was to Long Island that the robber barons of America had retired to enjoy their plunder. (Caro, Citation1975, p. 148)
The so-called robber barons – the Rockefellers, Vanderbilts, and their likes – had become rich on oil and railways and steel, in many cases obtaining monopolies in their sectors and gaining enormous political and economic power.
143
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
CompEurPol @compeurpol.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
@trymnf.com Trym N. Fjørtoft discusses Delegation without a coherent nation: non-majoritarianism in EU and US single market governance Part of Craig Parsons & Katarzyna Andrejuk special issue 'Europe’s Single Market in American Perspective' link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
Delegation without a coherent nation: non-majoritarianism in EU and US single market governance - Comparative European Politics
Non-majoritarian institutions like independent agencies and central banks play a significant role in market governance in the EU, the U.S., and everywhere. For many scholars, however, delegation to no...
001
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Jonathan Portes @jdportes.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
There has been a converted attempt here (including by the current Home Sec) to promote the "Danish model" of anti-immigrant policy as being somehow consistent with social democratic/progressive values. So we should welcome this mask-off moment from the Danish PM.
19424166
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 19/05/2026
My paper "Delegation without a coherent nation: non-majoritarianism in EU and US single market governance" is now out in @compeurpol.bsky.social. I try to challenge the common idea that delegation requires embedding in a "single democratic people" to be legitimate. ⇢ doi.org/10.1057/s412...
Delegation without a coherent nation: non-majoritarianism in EU and US single market governance

Trym N Fjørtoft

Abstract: Non-majoritarian institutions like independent agencies and central banks play a significant role in market governance in the EU, the U.S., and everywhere. For many scholars, however, delegation to non-majoritarian institutions requires the embedding in a single, coherent democratic people in order to be legitimate. This view underlies many of the strongest normative critiques of the EU, where the substantial powers of non-majoritarian institutions like the Commisison, the European Central Bank, and many decentralized agencies enjoy no such justification. I argue that this common normative account relies on an unsustainable notion of cultural and political coherence as a prerequisite for legitimacy. In its place, I defend a theory of legitimacy which builds on robust claims to the common good, expertise, and value inputs—all authorized and controlled by thinner democratic procedures. Using the example of single-market governance in the EU and the U.S., I show that legitimacy assessments which presuppose strong cultural and political coherence overstate the differences between the two polities.
121
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 18/05/2026
"For the EU, the conflict thus offers a chance to prove its (dormant) democratic value ... provided it stays the course and focuses on democracy as guiding principle of digital regulation rather than 'competitiveness' and 'innovation'" good stuff by @mpatberg.bsky.social
010
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Vlad Makszimov @vmakszimov.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Another day, another Hungarian captured institution performing independence. Today the Constitutional Court struck down the Orbán govt's retroactive decree that tried to kill Budapest's lawsuits over the "solidarity contribution." Looks like a win for rule of law. Is it? 🧵 1/9
telex.hu
Az Alkotmánybíróság visszamenőleges hatállyal megsemmisítette a szolidaritási adóról szóló kormányrendelet egyes rendelkezéseit
Az Országos Bírói Tanács jogorvoslati kérelmét tárgyalta az Alkotmánybíróság, a kifogásolt szabályokat megsemmisítették, Budapest tovább perelhet.
121
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Lum @brokentoys.social · 13/04/2026
75180395900
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Luděk Stavinoha @stavinoha.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
What's @frontex.bsky.social hiding, yet again?
26925
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Political Studies @polstudies.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
What makes technical expertise a legitimate source of authority? Trym Nohr Fjørtoft (@trymnf.com) examines “technical legitimacy”, proposing conditions under which expertise can justify delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. Read OPEN ACCESS: buff.ly/8ARyaUV @polstudiesassoc.bsky.social #ECRs
Screenshot of article abstract: In studies of non-majoritarian institutions, there is a widespread idea that political neutrality, epistemic authority, and technical expertise are sources of legitimacy. Empirical studies tend to find that such appeals are effective sources of legitimacy, but theorists are overwhelmingly skeptical of their normative appeal. This article’s conceptual ambition is to unify the disparate debates under the term technical legitimacy. The article’s theoretical ambition is to improve on the normative debate on technical legitimacy. Existing defenses fail to robustly satisfy the reasons that ground delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. I propose conditions for accepting technical legitimacy that are reasonably robust against counterfactuals. Technical legitimacy must meet three criteria. Institutions must promote a functionally specified common good; build on sound and undistorted expertise; and, perhaps counterintuitively, contain appropriate venues for value input.
042
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Dave Karpf @davekarpf.bsky.social · 05/03/2026
New post: Can AI Replace Social Science Researchers? (No. No it can't. Come on, now.) davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/can-ai-rep...
davekarpf.beehiiv.com
Can AI Replace Social Science Researchers?
No. No it can't. Come on, now.
24459127
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Political Studies @polstudies.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
What makes technical expertise a legitimate source of authority? Trym Nohr Fjørtoft (@trymnf.com) examines "technical legitimacy", proposing conditions under which expertise can justify delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. Read OPEN ACCESS: buff.ly/b3DAdu1 @polstudiesassoc.bsky.social #ECRs
buff.ly
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
063
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 17/02/2026
New paper forthcoming in Comparative European Politics! I argue that the legitimacy of non-majoritarian institutions doesn't hang on their embedding in a coherent democratic people. Preprint here, typeset version coming soon. → www.trymnf.com/files/papers...
010
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Karl Bode @karlbode.com · 13/02/2026
oh my god who could have ever predicted this in a million years (Politico was one of countless outlets, including CNN, Reuters, and others, that repeatedly propped up the lie that Republicans had done a miraculous good faith 180 on antitrust reform and monopoly power, something that was never real)
"The resignation of the Justice Department’s top antitrust cop is fueling a fear — even from some of Donald Trump’s own supporters — that corporate influence is corroding the populist antitrust movement the president championed at the beginning of his second term."
554976
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 11/02/2026
John Erik Fossum og jeg har meninger om demokratiets stilling i Europa. I Internasjonal Politikk nå – sammen med andre gode bidrag fra @unioslo-arena.bsky.social og @nupinytt.bsky.social. → doi.org/10.23865/int...
031
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Political Studies @polstudies.bsky.social · 31/01/2026
What makes technical expertise a legitimate source of authority? Trym Nohr Fjørtoft (@trymnf.com) examines “technical legitimacy”, proposing conditions under which expertise can justify delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. Read OPEN ACCESS: buff.ly/b3DAdu1 @polstudiesassoc.bsky.social #ECRs
065
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 27/01/2026
My Technical Legitimacy piece is now out in @polstudies.bsky.social! Pretty happy with this one, where I try to sort out the common claim that neutrality and expertise may be sources of legitimacy for unelected bodies. ➡ doi.org/10.1177/0032...
Abstract: 
In studies of non-majoritarian institutions, there is a widespread idea that political neutrality, epistemic authority, and technical expertise are sources of legitimacy. Empirical studies tend to find that such appeals are effective sources of legitimacy, but theorists are overwhelmingly skeptical of their normative appeal. This article’s conceptual ambition is to unify the disparate debates under the term technical legitimacy. The article’s theoretical ambition is to improve on the normative debate on technical legitimacy. Existing defenses fail to robustly satisfy the reasons that ground delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. I propose conditions for accepting technical legitimacy that are reasonably robust against counterfactuals. Technical legitimacy must meet three criteria. Institutions must promote a functionally specified common good; build on sound and undistorted expertise; and, perhaps counterintuitively, contain appropriate venues for value input.
032
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 27/01/2026
My Technical Legitimacy piece is now out in @polstudies.bsky.social! Pretty happy with this one, where I try to sort out the common claim that neutrality and expertise may be sources of legitimacy for unelected bodies. ➡ doi.org/10.1177/0032...
Abstract: 
In studies of non-majoritarian institutions, there is a widespread idea that political neutrality, epistemic authority, and technical expertise are sources of legitimacy. Empirical studies tend to find that such appeals are effective sources of legitimacy, but theorists are overwhelmingly skeptical of their normative appeal. This article’s conceptual ambition is to unify the disparate debates under the term technical legitimacy. The article’s theoretical ambition is to improve on the normative debate on technical legitimacy. Existing defenses fail to robustly satisfy the reasons that ground delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. I propose conditions for accepting technical legitimacy that are reasonably robust against counterfactuals. Technical legitimacy must meet three criteria. Institutions must promote a functionally specified common good; build on sound and undistorted expertise; and, perhaps counterintuitively, contain appropriate venues for value input.
032
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 12/01/2026
i think powell's response here is a demonstration of the folly of the idea that democratic accountability requires presidential control. what if the president is not acting in the public interest? you want independent agencies to be able to push back and pursue their *congressional mandate*
89107121957
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
maurice stierl @mauricestierl.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
Wrote an opinion piece for The Guardian: "Since migration has become the cornerstone of the current authoritarian turn, it is precisely around migration that resistance needs to form." www.theguardian.com/world/commen...
theguardian.com
Ten years of fortress Europe has served only cruelty, profiteers and racists. The next decade is up to us | Maurice Stierl
The hard right and far right are the political winners from the migration ‘crisis’, but only because centrist parties keep legitimising them, says migration and border researcher Maurice Stierl
212248
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 15/12/2025
My paper "Technical Legitimacy" has just been accepted for publication in @polstudies.bsky.social. A preprint available here for those who just can't wait for the typeset version: www.trymnf.com/files/papers...
Abstract: In studies of non-majoritarian institutions, there is a widespread idea that political neutrality, epistemic authority, and technical expertise are sources of legitimacy. Empirical studies tend to find that such appeals are effective sources of legitimacy, but theorists are overwhelmingly skeptical of their normative appeal. This paper’s conceptual ambition is to unify the disparate debates under the term technical legitimacy. The paper’s theoretical ambition is to improve on the normative debate on technical legitimacy. Existing defenses fail to robustly satisfy the reasons that ground delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. I propose conditions for accepting technical legitimacy that are reasonably robust against counterfactuals. Technical legitimacy must meet three criteria. Institutions must promote a functionally specified common good; build on sound and undistorted expertise; and, perhaps counterintuitively, contain appropriate venues for value input.
053
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 15/12/2025
My paper "Technical Legitimacy" has just been accepted for publication in @polstudies.bsky.social. A preprint available here for those who just can't wait for the typeset version: www.trymnf.com/files/papers...
Abstract: In studies of non-majoritarian institutions, there is a widespread idea that political neutrality, epistemic authority, and technical expertise are sources of legitimacy. Empirical studies tend to find that such appeals are effective sources of legitimacy, but theorists are overwhelmingly skeptical of their normative appeal. This paper’s conceptual ambition is to unify the disparate debates under the term technical legitimacy. The paper’s theoretical ambition is to improve on the normative debate on technical legitimacy. Existing defenses fail to robustly satisfy the reasons that ground delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. I propose conditions for accepting technical legitimacy that are reasonably robust against counterfactuals. Technical legitimacy must meet three criteria. Institutions must promote a functionally specified common good; build on sound and undistorted expertise; and, perhaps counterintuitively, contain appropriate venues for value input.
053
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Kevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 24/11/2025
Rachel Carson, in giving advice to a high schooler who was going to debate Silent Spring, showed a better awareness than many contemporary Democrats of how an opponent will ascribe positions to you that you do not espouse in bad faith to win over a public too inattentive to check for themselves.
One thing that fascinates me is this: Has “the thesis of Rachel Carson” been defined with precision as a preliminary to the debate? If it has not, you will probably find that you and your opponent are talking about entirely different things. I say this because a great many people who are talking about the book have not read it; they are arguing, not about what I have said, but about what the pesticide industry wants people to believe I said. Therefore, if you find your opponent saying my “thesis” is to abandon controls and “let nature take over,” I hope you will bring him back to reality by quoting from my concluding chapter.
1382
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Ulrik Eriksen @ulriken1.bsky.social · 16/10/2025
Ok, her har vi jo en ny KI-skandale. Og den innbefatter jo attpåtil Riksrevisjonen. De har gått helt god for et notat fra Menon (av alle steder) om at KI vil effektivisere staten med 155 000 årsverk. Hvordan Menon har kommet frem til tallet? Ved å spørre Chat GPT. www.scup.com/doi/10.18261...
411445
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Kevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 15/10/2025
I'm gonna try to articulate something I've been thinking about for a while, regarding *why* disillusionment, distrust, & dissatisfaction with democracy are rising. Almost everything I read takes this phenomenon as an exogenous shock, assuming no one chose to make it so. I suspect that's incomplete.
2026865
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 23/09/2025
"Common decency stigmatizes people that do not participate in it—removes them from voluntary association. We indeed have to live with one another, but terms and conditions apply." me on why Ezra Klein should be ashamed / why shame is Good Actually www.bostonreview.net/articles/how...
bostonreview.net
How Can We Live Together? - Boston Review
Ezra Klein is wrong: shame is essential.
20070931984
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Asheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 23/09/2025
when the interview goes well: www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a...
Screenshot from New Yorker interview by Isaac Chotiner with Cass Sunstein
171041180
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 22/09/2025
Two new publications today, both in Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 🏗️ Why Do Americans Not Care about Interstate Barriers in Construction? doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf027 🍸 Federal Spirits: Single Markets and the Case of Spirits Drinks doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf033
doi.org
American Services in European Perspective: Why Do Americans Not Care about Interstate Barriers in Construction?
Abstract. The European Union identifies the sector of construction services as a priority for its agenda to remove barriers to cross-border activity. Takin
131
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Europe Elects @europeelects.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
Serbia, Sprint Insight poll: Scenario: joint government vs. student list Student list-*: 55% SNS/SPS+-EPP: 42% Fieldwork: 23 June - 05 July 2025 Sample size: 1458 ➤ europeelects.eu/serbia
081
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Pavlos Roufos @proufos.bsky.social · 08/07/2025
This should be deeply embedded into everyone’s understanding: the pursuit of EU migration policy and the equivalent law-enforcement & surveillance agencies consistently violate the EU’s own laws. wearesolomon.com/mag/format/i...
wearesolomon.com
Frontex unlawfully shared thousands of people's personal data with Europol
Under the banner of fighting migrant smuggling, Frontex has collected, and unlawfully siphoned to Europol, personal data for years—quietly drawing thousands of migrants, as well as EU citizens aiding ...
1107
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Benjamin Braun @benbraun.social · 01/07/2025
🚨New article🚨 The consensus is that contestation pushed central banks to talk 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 about inequality & climate. Our theory: At first, CBs seek to ward off politicization by talking 𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 about controversial topics. We tested this 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐡𝐲𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐬.🧵 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Screenshot of the title page of linked article:
"Noisy Politics, Quiet Technocrats: Strategic Silence by Central Banks"
By Benjamin Braun and Maximilian Düsterhöft
310338
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Toby Vogel 🇪🇺 @tobyvogel.bsky.social · 08/05/2025
...endorsement of Putin's imperial war of conquest in Ukraine. Vučić, the autocratic leader of an EU candidate country, is siding with the EU's geopolitical adversary. This is a pretty black and white affair: the EU has to react with meaningful measures, beyond mere statements.
Picture showing Vučić in front of the Kremlin
022
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Toby Vogel 🇪🇺 @tobyvogel.bsky.social · 08/05/2025
Aleksandar Vučić, treated by the EU as its closest ally in the Balkans, has arrived in Moscow to attend Putin's spectacle tomorrow, defying very clear warnings by EU leaders. Slovakia's Robert Fico is also expected to attend. With their presence, these leaders signal their endorsement of...
Front page of the "Politika" daily showing Vučić arriving in Moscow
124
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Jo Wolff @jowolff.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
A footnote from David Miller, expressing highly recognisable reservations about the rise of the journal article.
Naturally this has implications for the way in which a political philosopher should communicate his ideas. One of the unwelcome side effects of turning political philosophy into an academic discipline has been the rise of the journal article as the preferred means of expression. Everything about it is forbidding to the lay reader. It has a formal structure that seems designed to reassure her that there will be no surprising turns of argument. It lays out in advance the conclusion to which she will be marched. It plods dutifully through the large literature on the topic, as though to confirm that no original thought is going to be expressed. It is weighed down with footnotes—in the worst case almost every sentence has a Harvard-style reference at the end. Everything about it signals that it’s intended only for the initiated— those who’ve already mastered the fifty-five other articles it cites. In all these respects it contrasts with the essay as a form of writing designed to convey ideas to the reader in an enticing and imaginative way and with little use of formal apparatus. For several centuries before this one, the essay was the primary means of conveying political-philosophical ideas to what Hume in his essay on the subject called ‘the conversible World’. ( D. Hume, ‘Of Essay Writing’, in D. Hume, Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by E. Miller (Liberty Press, 1985).
1115739
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
NY Times Pitchbot @nytpitchbot.bsky.social · 07/04/2025
Analysis | Trump is finally giving us the recession that Biden could never deliver.
534575941
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
Man, just LOOK at how everyone's reaction to Le Pen goes exactly in the quadrant my model says it would
2328
Trym Nohr Fjørtoft @trymnf.com · 01/04/2025
Hør meg og @mariannedahl.bsky.social i Ekko om studentdemonstrasjoner og demokrati i Europa 📻 radio.nrk.no/serie/ekko/M...
radio.nrk.no
Ekko - Ekko i P2 - NRK Radio
Bankane: Venn eller fiende? Dei tener stort medan vi slit. Vi ser på kvifor vi treng bankar og korleis dei eigentleg fungerar. Norsk plastoptimist i India Korleis kan ein bergensk ildsjel og ein indi...
063
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Kevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
Agree, with the exception that I have found republican worries about arbitrary power very helpful lately
042
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
lastpositivist.bsky.social @lastpositivist.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
In virtue of romantically engaged individuals having mixed their labour with the night,
2211
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Timothy Snyder @timothysnyder.bsky.social · 05/02/2025
Of course it’s a coup. Miss the obvious, lose your republic. open.substack.com/pub/snyder/p...
open.substack.com
Of course it’s a coup
Miss the obvious, lose your republic
5832813510727
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Steve Peers @stevepeers.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
Not an Onion headline
37719
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Elsa Kugelberg @elsakugelberg.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
New paper💡! My work on online dating, power and social institutions is now published in @apsrjournal.bsky.social! I provide a normative framework for what goes on in this part of the ‘digital sexual sphere’ and explore the role dating apps play in our societies. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
Dating Apps and the Digital Sexual Sphere | American Political Science Review | Cambridge Core
Dating Apps and the Digital Sexual Sphere
1715329
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Gresa Hasa @gresahasa.bsky.social · 27/01/2025
This is #Belgrade right now. Citizens have responded to the students’ call for a 24-hour blockade and protest, shutting down one of the main highways in the city. Could this be the end of #AleksandarVučić? I hope so. I stand in solidarity with Serbian students and citizens fighting for democracy!
11631231
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
front-LEX @front-lex.bsky.social · 13/01/2025
Big news! The EU Court of Justice has assigned our Hamoudi v. Frontex appeal to its Grand Chamber! It will hold a hearing on the groundbreaking damages claim filed by Alaa Hamoudi following a 17-hour pushback operation by Frontex and the Hellenic Coast Guard on 28-29 April 2020.
15620
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Claude Monet @monet.bsky.social · 28/12/2024
The Banks of the Fjord at Christiania, 1895
The Banks of the Fjord at Christiania
27512
Reposted by Trym Nohr Fjørtoft
Steve Peers @stevepeers.bsky.social · 06/01/2025
New open access book edited by Melanie Fink - on redressing fundamental rights violations by the EU - www.linkedin.com/posts/melani...
linkedin.com
Melanie Fink on LinkedIn: Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
A bit too late for a Christmas present, but just perfect for our reading-related New Year's resolutions: My book 'Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by…
1188