Reposted by Stan VeugerBill Grueskin @bgrueskin.bsky.social · 01/10/2026The other thing that Gov. Cox “expanded” is the Utah Supreme Court, adding two seats after his political party lost a big redistricting case. 1639593
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026The September issue of Veugerity, my monthly roundup, is out: amicus briefs on the forced-labor and Section 122 tariffs and on immigration detention, plus a post on DC's federal funding. open.substack.com/pub/veugerit...open.substack.comVeugerity — Issue #4September 2026 041
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026The September issue of Veugerity, my monthly roundup, is out: amicus briefs on the forced-labor and Section 122 tariffs and on immigration detention, plus a post on DC's federal funding. open.substack.com/pub/veugerit...open.substack.comVeugerity — Issue #4September 2026 041
Reposted by Stan VeugerAaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 24/09/2026Hannity's list of "TRUMP'S TOP ACCOMPLISHMENTS" includes restoring Confederate names to military bases and releasing dietary guidelines 3033616812
Reposted by Stan VeugerAndy Craig @andycraig.bsky.social · 23/09/2026The fact that it's become such a shrugged-off overused cliche has blinded us to how much the dashboard really is lit up with screaming red lights blaring "this the fall of the Roman republic, you idiots." 211920
Reposted by Stan VeugerMassiveCivilResistance @wildoneness.bsky.social · 23/09/2026“Terrible things are happening outside. Poor helpless people are being dragged out of their homes. Families are torn apart. Men, women, and children are separated. Children come home from school to find that their parents have disappeared.” Diary of Anne Frank January 13, 1943 02319
Reposted by Stan VeugerJacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 17/09/2026Trump thinks that it's a hostile act against the US if other countries trade with the US, and also if other countries trade with each other without the US. 2026559
Reposted by Stan VeugerMax Kennerly @maxkennerly.bsky.social · 15/09/2026After his testimony, there is no doubt that the rule was changed for one specific person that Kash Patel knows personally and he wants to hire (or already hired) and their circumstance is definitely not "trafficking victim." 631681327
Reposted by Stan VeugerJulian Sanchez @normative.bsky.social · 15/09/2026All of this is a lie. Anyone who has visited recently knows the KC was not "in a virtual state of collapse," and anyone who can read a tax filing can see that it was not "losing hundreds of millions of dollars". In fact, its finances were pretty healthy UNTIL Trump trashified it. 121250375
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/09/2026As always I am grateful to Jenner & Block for their pro bono support, and to my fellow amici, including @danieldbunn.bsky.social @kclausing.bsky.social @simonhrjohnson.bsky.social @kylepomerleau.bsky.social. 041
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/09/2026…assumptions; and that the tariffs are large enough to raise a major question because of the revenue they raise, their effects on consumers, and their impact on firms and U.S. competitiveness. You can read the full brief here: www.aei.org/wp-content/u...aei.org 121
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/09/2026The pretextual justification for these tariffs is the burden on US commerce from overseas production involving forced labor. We explain that the tariffs are disproportionate compared to the economic impact of forced labor on U.S. employment, production, and trade under any set of reasonable… 132
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/09/2026Pleased to present the economist amicus brief we filed yesterday in support of plaintiffs in litigation against the administration’s latest round of worldwide tariffs, imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. 1327
Reposted by Stan VeugerKimberly Clausing @kclausing.bsky.social · 13/09/2026Happy to be a part of this effort. These forced labor tariffs make no sense unless they are understood for what they are: a clear attempt to take authority that belongs to Congress. The tariffs bear no relation to possible underlying harms; they merely create a distortionary and regressive tax. 0157
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/09/2026Pleased to present the economist amicus brief we filed yesterday in support of plaintiffs in litigation against the administration’s latest round of worldwide tariffs, imposed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. 1327
Reposted by Stan VeugerWill Stancil @whstancil.bsky.social · 12/09/2026I find it infuriating and unnerving how liberals are unable to recognize brownshirts when they see them, or understand that brownshirts exist along a separate axis of public mobilization than “protesters,” which is how they’re always described. These aren’t protesters, they’re paramilitaries! 1046973
Reposted by Stan VeugerJulian Sanchez @normative.bsky.social · 11/09/2026Remember kids, communism isn’t when the government owns the means of production. It’s when someone with blue hair tells you their pronouns, as Karl Marx demanded. 41304236
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026...@dougrediker.bsky.social, @michaelrstrain.bsky.social, and @omzidar.bsky.social. 131
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026I am also thankful to the many colleagues and friends who joined the brief as signatories, including @gbenga-ajilore.bsky.social, @danieldbunn.bsky.social, @stevecicala.bsky.social, @kclausing.bsky.social, @jasonfurman.bsky.social, @simonhrjohnson.bsky.social, @kylepomerleau.bsky.social,... 141
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026As always I am grateful to Aaron Cooper, Debbie Berman, Adam Unikowsky, and their colleagues at Jenner & Block, as well as to Holger Spamann, for their pro bono counsel. 121
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026The government's interpretation of the statutes and the economic concepts in it would grant it unconstrained authority to impose worldwide tariffs that, as we have seen, have vast economic and political significance. You can read the full brief here: www.aei.org/wp-content/u...aei.org 121
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Separately, we argue the United States does not face the "fundamental international payments problems" the statute requires as a threshold condition for authorizing (or in fact, mandating) the tariffs. 121
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026With floating exchange rates, no balance-of-payments imbalance can be “large and serious" in the sense of Section 122. 121
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026We explain what such deficits looked like in the context of fixed exchange rates policymakers found themselves in until the 1970s, and that the government conflates balance-of-payments deficits with negative intermediate balances on the accounting statement known as the Balance of Payments. 121
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026In the brief, we argue that "large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits," which the tariffs purportedly address, are impossible in today's system of floating exchange rates. 131
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026I organized an economist amicus brief in support of affirmance of the Court of International Trade's ruling in Oregon v. Trump and Burlap and Barrel v. Donald J. Trump that the administration exceeded its authority when it imposed 10% worldwide tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. 174
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 10/09/2026Update: the government now agrees with G.M.’s counsel that because governor Hochul pardoned him in late August, the basis for his removal and 1226(c) detention is gone and the case is moot. The Second Circuit’s ruling stands, and victory is ours. 000
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026I organized an economist amicus brief in support of affirmance of the Court of International Trade's ruling in Oregon v. Trump and Burlap and Barrel v. Donald J. Trump that the administration exceeded its authority when it imposed 10% worldwide tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. 174
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 09/09/2026@graemeblair.com, David Hausman, and I organized an amicus brief in Genalo v . G.M., a case the Supreme Court will hear in October. The case revolves around the question of whether due process requires bond hearings for those subject to prolonged immigration detention under Section 1226(c). 196
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 08/09/2026In my second post on DC’s federal funding for Capital Commonsense, I compare DC to the 50 states. capitalcommonsense.substack.com/p/how-does-t...capitalcommonsense.substack.comHow Does the District’s Federal Funding Compare to the 50 States?In my previous post, I explained how the federal government contributes to funding DC’s local government. 196
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 08/09/2026The conclusion is clear: DC would end up with more revenue than it collects now, most of the additional revenue would be raised from non-residents, and its federal share would be middle-of-the-pack. 021
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 08/09/2026I then engage in the following thought experiment: what if we removed DC’s special federal subsidies, but let it raise revenue like the states? 121
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 08/09/2026I start from consolidated state and local figures from the Census Bureau’s Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, but make a couple of adjustments that reflect flows unique to DC. These numbers make it seem as if DC’s funding is particularly generous. 121
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 08/09/2026In my second post on DC’s federal funding for Capital Commonsense, I compare DC to the 50 states. capitalcommonsense.substack.com/p/how-does-t...capitalcommonsense.substack.comHow Does the District’s Federal Funding Compare to the 50 States?In my previous post, I explained how the federal government contributes to funding DC’s local government. 196
Reposted by Stan VeugerBill Grueskin @bgrueskin.bsky.social · 06/09/2026If I had a reporter covering the State Department, I’d ask that person to find out what Marco Rubio does all day, outside of cutting foreign aid. 721002233
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 01/09/2026Here is my monthly roundup. A short one for August, featuring among other things DC’s federal funding and the US labor market. Subscribe to receive future editions! open.substack.com/pub/veugerit...open.substack.comVeugerity — Issue #3August 2026 020
Reposted by Stan Veugeramanda moore 🐢 @noturtlesoup17.bsky.social · 30/08/2026Kind of surprised not a single outlet wanted this. Maybe the interest is gone and this is just what America is now. Lots of photographers asking me about southwest Florida though! 171742529
Reposted by Stan Veugeramanda moore 🐢 @noturtlesoup17.bsky.social · 30/08/2026This is my most viewed video on Instagram ever with 2.5 million views. No licenses. Never had such a big delta between public interest and media interest! 7516119
Reposted by Stan VeugerWalter Olson @walterolson.bsky.social · 24/08/2026Today’s merit-delaying ruling on mail voting reflects a studied naïveté by the majority about whether what Trump is up to Is illegal. (Who can know until his team takes definitive coercive action?) As Justice Jackson writes, it “needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty” into the fall elections. 57515
Reposted by Stan VeugerAsawin Suebsaeng @swin24.bsky.social · 23/08/2026If you want to go to a trade school, great? Think college isn’t for you? Ok. But that’s not what this is, this is the government trying to do culture war social engineering while also staring down their noses at poor kids and preemptively deciding things like: I don’t want you as my doctor, next 1542576630
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 21/08/2026Come to the American Enterprise Institute on October 9! You will hear about @omzidar.bsky.social and Eric Zwick’s book, “The Everywhere Millionaire: Who Is Really Rich in America and How They Got There,” from the authors and Greg Ip. Register here: www.aei.org/events/the-e... Lunch will be served.aei.org 002
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 21/08/2026Come to the American Enterprise Institute on October 9! You will hear about @omzidar.bsky.social and Eric Zwick’s book, “The Everywhere Millionaire: Who Is Really Rich in America and How They Got There,” from the authors and Greg Ip. Register here: www.aei.org/events/the-e... Lunch will be served.aei.org 002
Reposted by Stan Veugermtsw @mtsw.bsky.social · 21/08/2026I think the Natalie Harp stuff is a "useful issue" for Dems to spotlight in part because the DC media types have cooked their brains into thinking the bizarre way Trump runs his white house is normal and actual normies recoil when exposed to that reality. 1151142
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 20/08/2026I have a piece out for Capital Commonsense on DC’s federal funding, the first of a series in which I will explain how DC’s federal funding works, how DC compares to the 50 states, how the major grant programs work, etcetera. capitalcommonsense.substack.com/p/how-does-t...capitalcommonsense.substack.comHow Does the District Use Federal Funding?A few weeks ago, Ashley explained how the District collects its own-source revenue—its revenue from taxes, fees, and fines. 131
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 20/08/2026I have a piece out for Capital Commonsense on DC’s federal funding, the first of a series in which I will explain how DC’s federal funding works, how DC compares to the 50 states, how the major grant programs work, etcetera. capitalcommonsense.substack.com/p/how-does-t...capitalcommonsense.substack.comHow Does the District Use Federal Funding?A few weeks ago, Ashley explained how the District collects its own-source revenue—its revenue from taxes, fees, and fines. 131
Reposted by Stan VeugerPatrick Chovanec @prchovanec.bsky.social · 16/08/2026Jesus, man, I’m a conservative former Republican and I’m more radicalized than this dude. ICE are a bunch of thugs who need to be put in prison. 46703159
Reposted by Stan VeugerStan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Interesting, the Financial Times appears to be experimenting with AI-generated op-eds: www.ft.com/content/7ff4...ft.comTrump is taxing the dark matter that pays America’s wayThe administration’s tariff regime undermines the income the US receives from deploying knowledge abroad 141
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/08/2026One question I haven’t seen discussed much: should Harvard faculty crank out barely edited Claude-generated op-eds? 010
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Interesting, the Financial Times appears to be experimenting with AI-generated op-eds: www.ft.com/content/7ff4...ft.comTrump is taxing the dark matter that pays America’s wayThe administration’s tariff regime undermines the income the US receives from deploying knowledge abroad 141
Stan Veuger @stanveuger.bsky.social · 11/08/2026The pillars of my ESG investment framework, Equity Stakes and Graft 000