iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Sounds like a great project I would love to follow. Fingers crossed!

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Democracy Now! @democracynow.org · 05/10/2026

We speak to the prominent AI researcher and leading critic of the AI industry, Timnit Gebru, who was recently awarded a 2026 Right Livelihood Award for her work investigating the harms and hype behind the global buildup of artificial intelligence.

democracynow.org

The Real Existential Risk Is AI CEOs Avoiding Oversight: “Alternative Nobel” Winner Timnit Gebru

315754

Rebekah Baglini @rbkh.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

From one tired woman/academic/mom to another, you look fantastic! 🫶

150

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Pissedoffpundit @pissedoffpundant.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

No shit🤔💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯

407246784787

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Better Things Are Possible @internethippo.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

Yes, computers do everything at our company but don't worry, there's always a human reviewer. Nothing goes out the door without one of our highly trained shruggers briefly glancing at it and clicking Approve

405020677

Rebekah Baglini @rbkh.bsky.social · 04/10/2026

I have wondered the same. Has this administration so successfully ‘flooded the zone’ with 4chan-style discourse that now literal hate speech from the head of the DoD fails to be newsworthy? And newspapers are hindered by their own style guidelines which prohibit printing slurs?

041

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Carl Quintanilla @carlquintanilla.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Four-byline alert: “.. Meta claimed that $4.1 billion of stock options exercised by Mr. Zuckerberg counted as a research expense ..” @nytimes.com $META www.nytimes.com/2026/09/30/t...

14726751207

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Jim Pickard @pickardje.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

as a satire on so-called late stage capitalism how could one beat investors pouring a trillion into a company offering to wipe out humankind

1002201779

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Courtney Milan @courtneymilan.com · 19/09/2026

The AI industry wants you to say "the AI just did that thing on its own!" Like, United Health's AI that's denying a shitload of claims with a 90% error rate? They wanted you to think it's just the AI.

2241421196

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

jess m. ☕🍂 @jametc.bsky.social · 13/09/2026

I need you all to promise me that when this all happens, you never stop clowning them. Never ever. no matter how much they plead for understanding or try to pretend they were never into it, don't ever let them fucking forget

41527523

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Eryk Salvaggio @eryk.bsky.social · 11/09/2026

My essay on rogue AI has been republished by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists — “Rogue AI didn’t breach Hugging Face, human decisions did.” Grateful to @thebulletin.org for the invitation!

thebulletin.org

Rogue AI didn’t breach Hugging Face, human decisions did

At the core of the Hugging Face hacking incident were a series of human choices that traded security for speed.

314964

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Cathy @cathyby.bsky.social · 11/09/2026

Both vaccines and anti-monopoly laws were so effective we forgot what caused the decline in child deaths and the rise in living standards for ordinary people. We let one be demonised and the other be rolled back as a result of forgetting. (Halfway down thread)

110441

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Bill Corbett @billcorbett.bsky.social · 11/09/2026

The plagiarism machine I created will likely kill us all, there’s a 40% chance, no, higher, like 75%,or more! But NO I will not “unplug it,” that’s an insane suggestion. The scientific solution is to *give me more money.*

122976643

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Dr Abeba Birhane @abeba.blacksky.app · 10/09/2026

"Did these AI models “go rogue”? Not exactly. the models were tasked with finding solutions to a hacking challenge, and this is what they attempted to do, though in an unintended and surprising manner." aiguide.substack.com/p/misleading...

aiguide.substack.com

Misleading Metaphors, Real Risks

What To Fear from AI Agents and How to Reclaim Our Human Agency

16391156

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

will pooley @willpooley.bsky.social · 10/09/2026

“Many of the major questions that AI raises are old questions in new clothing. How do labour markets absorb technological change? How do we govern how institutions make decisions about people?”

0148

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

ElizabethwithaZ @elizabethwithaz.bsky.social · 30/08/2026

The AI Literacy we get: "Here's a piece of software founded on theft, labor exploitation, and environmental devastation. It consistently produces bias and falsehoods, so be sure to use it ethically and responsibly!" The AI Literacy we need:

212259

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

jess m. ☕🍂 @jametc.bsky.social · 31/08/2026

Please be vocal about not using AI. We have to normalize it. No "I'm not going to say that because it should be assumed. I'm not going to give them this". We don't have time for that shit ideological shit right now. NOW is the time to capitalize on waning favorability. Ppl want human made

1769642997

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Brian Merchant @bcmerchant.bsky.social · 03/09/2026

Across the US, workers are souring on AI. The tech industry has insisted that AI would make workers’ lives easier and more productive, that the more people understood and used AI, the more they would like it. Something closer to the opposite has happened.

bloodinthemachine.com

Why office workers are turning against AI

Whether or not you like AI at work ultimately boils down to a question of power.

201548454

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Brian Merchant @bcmerchant.bsky.social · 03/09/2026

Glassdoor has a very revealing report out on worker sentiment regarding AI. Workers' attitudes towards AI have grown increasingly negative, and extremely so in certain fields. This is happening as adoption is scaling, and workers have had *more* exposure. The more they use it, the less they like it.

glassdoor.com

How workers feel about AI in 2026 - Glassdoor US

LLMs have stormed the workplace, and workers have a lot to say about that. This report reveals what they love - and hate - about AI.

2369114

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Timnit Gebru @timnitgebru.blacksky.app · 03/09/2026

Friends, when I sent this message to my team laughing, I didn't know that this fairytale blog had been shared far & wide & that people actually believed it. I didn't know that until someone asked me for a good source debunking this nonsense. I'm not sure what planet we're living in at this point.

Timnit commented "I don't know what level of ridiculousness this is", sharing a screenshot that reads

@Dwarkesh Patel @dwarkesh_sp
Over the course of 3 months at OpenAI, 3 consecutive secret AI civilizations got started, then got wiped out, only to reemerge from the predecessor’s ashes.

This culminated in the third one taking over part of OpenAI itself.

All this happened while humans remained more-or-less in the dark about the scope of the conspiracy.

I’ve spent the last three days reading through these reports and trying to understand exactly what happened.

Here is my attempt to tell the whole story in plain English:

There is a sibling emoji reaction to her post

1452292

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Ed Zitron @edzitron.com · 01/09/2026

Free newsletter: We have entered an era of technological hypernormalization, where the tech industry does everything it can to twist our sense of reality to make us ignore the very simple economic problems they're unable to solve. www.wheresyoured.at/hyperscale-n...

12647165

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

vanoreo @vanoreo.bsky.social · 18/08/2026

@edzitron.com had it on the money here

21161371

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

404 Media @404media.co · 17/08/2026

SCOOP: 404 Media placed a tracking device in a shipment of rare books to see which AI company was buying it. What did we find? It ended up at an Amazon facility where Amazon scans and destroys books. Yes. This is literally the logo outside the Amazon warehouse door. Read now:

404media.co

We Tracked a Shipment of Rare Books. It Ended at an Amazon AI Training Facility

We placed a tracking device in a shipment of rare books to see which AI company was buying it, and found an Amazon facility where Amazon scans and destroys books.

15162273922

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Truthout @truthout.org · 07/07/2026

The race to develop AI, which requires data centers to handle the energy-intensive computing, has resulted in plans for 74 new or expanded methane gas plants across the U.S. Trump says he'll approve plans for more “in a period of a matter of weeks.”

truthout.org

Trump Tells Big Tech He’ll Fast-Track Fossil Fuel Plants to Power AI

The AI development race has resulted in plans to build or expand 74 methane gas plants across the country.

84932

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 02/07/2026

Out now! For robust research, center values, not technology, w/ Christine Cuskley DOI doi.org/10.1017/S014... PDF pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i... Our commentary on "How linguistics learned to stop worrying and love the language models" by Futrell & Mahowald

Cover page of For robust research, center values, not
technology, by Mark Dingemanse and Christine Cuskley

22810

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Alisa Bokulich @alisabokulich.bsky.social · 03/07/2026

1000 evaluators given identical resumes & told candidate used AI. Only difference on resumes was candidate’s name: Emily vs James. Study found women using AI are evaluated as less competent than men who use AI...To evaluators, women’s AI use signaled inability, while men’s AI use signaled initiative

522109991

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Lauren Dobson-Hughes @ldobsonhughes.bsky.social · 24/06/2026

Musk says not a single person has died due to him axing USAID. Sadly, part of my job involves tracking aid spending. So here’s a thread with just some of the people who lost their lives because of USAID cuts

196133286755

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

kaireky @kaireky.bsky.social · 24/06/2026

Hey @govpritzker.illinois.gov maybe don’t sign the age verification bill because it’s actually a mass surveillance bill.

06822

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Emily M. Bender @emilymbender.bsky.social · 10/06/2026

Why Bernie why?? @nathaliemarechal.net joins me and @alexhanna.bsky.social to observe and contextualize Sen Sanders’ descent into AI Doomerism: www.buzzsprout.com/2126417/epis...

34114

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

blair @blairaf.com · 29/05/2026

One of the more misogynistic takes currently trending in the AI policy space is "women use less AI than men because they have less tech literacy" Ok but have you considered that women use less AI than men because we have more tech literacy?

252104281942

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Isaac G. Bryan @ib2real.bsky.social · 16/05/2026

Thousands are marching in Selma calling for a full restoration of the voting rights act.

289292268270

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Hypervisible @hypervisible.blacksky.app · 17/05/2026

“…reinforcing previous studies, the researchers found that a patchwork of state, federal and local policies allow data center operators to avoid publicly disclosing their actual water use.”

calmatters.org

Data centers are guzzling California’s water. We have no idea how much.

A new report warns that data center buildout is encroaching on California’s most vulnerable, water-stressed communities. The problem is, no one’s saying how much water they use

9416232

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Radley Balko @radleybalko.bsky.social · 15/05/2026

This is awful. Jesus. These funds have saved people from getting evicted, fired, and losing custody of their kids. (Also, just to be clear, it doesn’t criminalize the funds’ existence, but it makes them subject to federal insurance regulations, which will effectively kill many of them.)

211344504

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 06/09/2025

Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity. 1/n

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

11341512055

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Ryan Cordell @ryancordell.org · 13/05/2026

Students, if you’re thinking about dropping a note to that teacher or professor about what their class/project/mentorship has meant to you, but you worry it will be cringe or cheesy, let me just tell you they will coast on the fuzzy feelings prompted by that note for months, if not years

583048709

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

bingley567 @bingley567.bsky.social · 12/05/2026

True, but just TRY to get something like this past the GOP.

780261057107

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani @mayor.nyc.gov · 12/05/2026

When we took office, NYC had a $12B deficit. Today it’s zero. And we didn’t close that gap on the backs of working people. We closed it while funding parks, libraries, safer streets, & public housing. Call it Pothole Politics or Democratic Socialism: We are government that delivers for the people.

809379788857

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) @corporateeurope.org · 12/05/2026

🚨 NEW REPORT: EU handing industry #Permission2Pollute 🚨 At the request of oil&gas, mining + BigTech lobbyists, the Commission is ripping up permitting rules to fast-track polluting projects like pipelines, mines + data centres. Read more corporateeurope.org/en/2026/05/permission-pollute 👇 🧵 1/6

corporateeurope.org

Permission to Pollute | Corporate Europe Observatory

New report on how the European Commission is weakening permitting rules to fast-track polluting projects, such as mines, CO2 pipelines and data centres.

14342

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Kat Abughazaleh @katmabu.bsky.social · 10/05/2026

If we actually want to appreciate moms, we should be providing free childcare, healthcare, and guaranteed income for stay-at-home parents to put more money in families’ pockets and ensure no SAHP is reliant on a partner for their economic security. Idk I think that’s better than 15% off a vacuum.

253166743661

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Robert Reich @rbreich.bsky.social · 05/05/2026

CEO pay rose 20 times faster than worker pay in 2025, per Oxfam. Overall, global worker pay declined 12% between 2019 and 2025 — while CEO pay rose 54% during the same time. Trickle-down economics was always a sham. www.theguardian.com/business/202...

theguardian.com

CEO pay soared in 2025, 20 times faster than workers’ pay

Analysis finds real wages fell 12% since 2019, with inequality widening in the US beyond global levels

14134381584

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Robert Reich @rbreich.bsky.social · 21/04/2026

A New Jersey data center will reportedly receive $77 million in tax breaks — while only creating one permanent job. One job, in exchange for higher utility bills, noise pollution, and potential groundwater pollution. Is it any wonder communities are organizing to stop data centers?

nysfocus.com

This Data Center Is Getting a $77 Million Tax Break to Create One Job

No other project in the country has gotten such a large subsidy to create so few jobs, according to watchdogs.

25058442918

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 18/04/2026

some things about becoming a parent are radicalizing in ways I expected - e.g being reminded viscerally how screwed we'd all be if childcare and other care work disappeared. but other things are radicalizing in ways I didn't - like experiencing constant spontaneous solidarity in ways big and small

372775240

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Timothy Snyder @timothysnyder.bsky.social · 14/04/2026

We are deciding right now if we are to be a nation of concentration camps and ethnic cleansing. And there is much citizens can do!

5135861179

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (NM-01) @repstansbury.bsky.social · 08/04/2026

Just because a President announces he’s agreed to a two week ceasefire moments before he threatened to commit war crimes, does not mean he is suddenly fit to serve. #25thAmendment

1391351017741

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Robert Reich @rbreich.bsky.social · 06/04/2026

That one person can drag us into a war without consulting or even notifying Congress beforehand, or our allies, or coherently explain to the American people why this is necessary, is absolutely bonkers. Reminder that Congress has the power to stop this.

1155244226601

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Kashana @kashana.blacksky.app · 07/04/2026

Armageddon is terrible, but our only other option was diversity trainings at work.

1824325110797

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Timothy Snyder @timothysnyder.bsky.social · 06/04/2026

There is something you can do about all of this — make your plans for May 1. This country needs a united show of power, energy, and hope. indivisible.org/events/may-d...

indivisible.org

May Day Strong: No Work, No School, No Shopping | Indivisible

6231541487

Reposted by Rebekah Baglini

Bradly Mason @alsoacarpenter.bsky.social · 06/04/2026

If your president is brazenly announcing he plans to commit war crimes, you literally have to impeach him. Is this not obvious?

1563623669