Sign in

Raimundo Aguayo

@raguayo.bsky.social
141 followers 114 following 38 posts

Lecturer at @unicomplutense.bsky.social | Psychological quantitative methods. Psychometrics. Meta-analysis.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
New "Research Handbook on the Replication Crisis" Edited by David Trafimow with 17 chapters covering issues such as results-blind publishing, preregistration, theory development, and statistical inference. www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/res...
083
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Juan Ramón @unnombrealazar.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
Creo que este artículo es muy indicativo de los problemas laborales del profesorado universitario. Todo el texto va sobre los problemas de los criterios para repartir migajas entre el profesorado; no se entra en ningún momento en por qué son migajas. www.eldiario.es/sociedad/uni...
eldiario.es
La Universidad Autónoma de Madrid cambia el criterio de las cátedras y deja fuera a profesores con más experiencia
La universidad excluye la docencia previa a 2007 y puntúa casi lo mismo seis años de investigación en determinadas circunstancias que 24; más de 80 catedráticos de Derecho han firmado una carta pidién...
193
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Felipe Fontana Vieira @felipefv.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
My first (and rather small) R package is ready to be shared! This is one of my attempts, done on my spare time during the past months, to increase awareness about the assumptions usually hidden when using a factor model(s): felipelfv.github.io/structest/
felipelfv.github.io
Testing the Structural Interpretation of a Univariate Latent Factor Model
Implements two statistical tests from VanderWeele and Vansteelandt (2022, JRSS-B) to reject the structural interpretation of a univariate latent factor model. The T0 test (Section 3.2) depends on reli...
3296
Raimundo Aguayo @raguayo.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Me gusta el mensaje reflexivo y conciliador, alejado de mensajes de consumo rápido y polarizantes. ¿Hernán Cortés o Cuauthémoc? elpais.com/opinion/2026...
elpais.com
¿Hernán Cortés o Cuauthémoc?
En la polémica sobre la petición de perdón por la conquista, tanto el nacionalismo español como el mexicano se dirigen a un público doméstico: aspiran a la hegemonía cultural frente a sus adversarios ...
010
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Samuel P León @samuelpleon.bsky.social · 17/03/2026
🧵 New preprint out! How transparent is methodological quality assessment in systematic reviews? I introduce the Revised Methodological Quality Scale (RMQS), a framework designed to make these evaluations explicit, structured, and reproducible. 🔗 doi.org/10.35542/osf...
doi.org
OSF
174
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
SPARC @sparcopen.bsky.social · 17/03/2026
Concerned about the impact of impact factors on research? Learn about responsible research assessment & and how it can improve evaluation practices. DORA @dorassessment.bsky.social is offering a free, self-paced course on driving research assessment reform. Register here: sfdora.org/courses/intr...
sfdora.org
Introduction to Responsible Research Assessment Course | DORA
084
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Magnus Johansson @pgmj.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
Any good papers on the problems with meta-analysis when the outcome variable's data generating process is (zero-inflated) negative binomial and not well represented by mean/SD? Suggested solutions also appreciated #stats #rstats
1114
Raimundo Aguayo @raguayo.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
Bear in mind that "any single [empirical] study is rarely adequate by itself to answer a scientific question. Therefore each study should be considered as a data point to be contributed to a later meta-analysis”. Schmidt (1996). [Added]
110
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Emilio Verche @everche.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
1️⃣ Fiabilidad en Memoria Verbal: Analizamos 463 estudios, de una búsqueda inicial de 2774, y los resultados son preocupantes: el 93,9% induce la fiabilidad, comprometiendo metodológicamente la investigación neuropsicológica. 👥 @raguayo.bsky.social, Á. Correas y S. Arranz-Paraíso
111
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Emilio Verche @everche.bsky.social · 25/02/2026
¿Sabías que el 93,9% de los estudios sobre memoria verbal en neuropsicología en español "inducen" la fiabilidad? Es decir, asumen que un test es preciso porque lo dice el manual, pero no lo comprueban con sus propios datos. Trabajo recién publicado en Neuropsychology Review 🧵👇
211
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Emilio Verche @everche.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
Se habla mucho del auge de las universidades privadas, pero poco de un dato que mencionaban hoy en "Un tema al día" de @eldiario.es de @juanlusanchez.bsky.social: uno de cada siete préstamos personales son para fines académicos. Es tremendo el dato.
011
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
Statistical Tests as Thought Experiments “The only populations that can be referred to in a test of significance have no objective reality, being exclusively the product of the statistician’s imagination through the hypotheses which he has decided to test” (Fisher, 1956, p. 77).
ia802908.us.archive.org
1125
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
NCME @ncme38.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
In a recent article in JEM, Lee et al. present a generalizability theory framework for estimating conditional standard errors of measurement and related reliability indices in the context of randomly parallel testing. Learn more: buff.ly/XEBt4uO #NCMEResearch
001
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
ReproducibiliTea UM @reproducibiliteaum.bsky.social · 22/01/2026
Recordatorio de que nos vemos el lunes 26 a las 16h!
011
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 22/01/2026
Comparing registrations to published papers is essential to research integrity - and almost no one does it routinely because it's slow, messy, and time-demanding. RegCheck was built to help make this process easier. Today, we launch RegCheck V2. 🧵 regcheck.app
regcheck.app
RegCheck
RegCheck is an AI tool to compare preregistrations with papers instantly.
818696
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Anil Seth @anilseth.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
1/🧵 Out today in @frontiersin.bsky.social : “Consciousness science: where are we, where are we going, and what if we get there?” By @axc.bsky.social @liadmudrik.bsky.social, & me (a CIFAR & @erc.europa.eu production 🧠). www.frontiersin.org/journals/sci...
frontiersin.org
Advancing consciousness science
Defining new directions in consciousness research and exploring implications for medicine, technology, and ethics
26129
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Lisa DeBruine @debruine.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
The package formerly known as papercheck has changed its name to metacheck! We're checking more than just papers, with functions to assess OSF projects, github repos, and AsPredicted pre-registrations, with more being developed all the time. scienceverse.github.io/metacheck/
scienceverse.github.io
Check Research Outputs for Best Practices
A modular, extendable system for automatically checking research outputs for best practices using text search, R code, and/or (optional) LLM queries.
19139
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Onyi Arah, MD, DSc, PhD @oacarah.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
New paper for #causalinference folks in all fields #DAGs #CausalDiagrams #CausalSky #StatsSky #EpiSky academic.oup.com/ije/article/...
academic.oup.com
Making DAGs even more useful: using augmented causal diagrams to depict counterfactual, study design, measurement, analytical, and interventional features
Since their mainstream introduction in the 1990s, causal diagrams, including directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), have been increasingly used to depict our caus
0144
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
How participants create illusory experiences to help experimenters: osf.io/n2ukj
021
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Juan Ramón @unnombrealazar.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Vamos camino de la nada a gran escala. Durante un tiempo pareció que la academia podíamos ser una especie de resistencia a ciertos modos de estar en el mundo. Ahora somos productores de aire soportado por más aire. bsky.app/profile/sabr...
262
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Just published in Behavior Research Methods: The individual-level precision of implicit measures w/ @ianhussey.mmmdata.io 🧵👇 link.springer.com/article/10.3...
link.springer.com
The individual-level precision of implicit measures - Behavior Research Methods
Implicit measures are used extensively in psychological science. One fundamental goal of these measures is to provide information diagnostic of an individual’s attitudes or beliefs. After 25 years of ...
15122
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 05/12/2025
"Replication rates are higher than experts predicted and p-hacking is much less common than we expected!" replications.clearerthinking.org/three-surpri...
Three Surprises From Attempting To Replicate Recent Studies in Top Psychology Journals
Amanda Metskas
December 4, 2025
How has the replication rate of psychology studies changed in recent years? 

Are we still experiencing a “replication crisis,” where only 40-60% of results replicate when the study is conducted again?
16021
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Miguel Vadillo @mavadillo.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Couldn't agree more...
062
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 03/12/2025
A short preprint describing our adoption of more consistent and precise use of terminology related to reproducibility, robustness, replicability, repeatability, and credibility. osf.io/preprints/me...
58729
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
MetaArXivBot @metaarxivbot.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
A Brief Glossary of Terms about Repeatability: Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility: osf.io/mqfp4
011
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Thom Volker @thomvolker.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
Unless I miss the point of their paper entirely, Vos & Holbert (doi.org/10.1007/s112...) argue that the "hypothetical sampling" view of frequentism is not required, but can be viewed as chance outcomes with certain proportions. This seems to alleviate these CI-interpretation issues as well.
doi.org
Frequentist statistical inference without repeated sampling - Synthese
Frequentist inference typically is described in terms of hypothetical repeated sampling but there are advantages to an interpretation that uses a single random sample. Contemporary examples are given ...
093
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Oscar Lecuona @oscarlecuona.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
Este sábado 22 estaré con otras compañera, en mi caso hablando de la revolución de la credibilidad y la crisis de replicacion
031
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Tim Kaiser @tkaiser.science · 11/11/2025
🚀 New paper (open access) out in Cognitive Therapy & Research: we (@herzog.bsky.social, @evalottabrakemeier.bsky.social, @hudsongolino.bsky.social and me) ask whether group‑level symptom‑change networks in CBT actually capture what happens inside each patient. #Psychology #CBT
link.springer.com
Must We Always Go Idiographic? - Cognitive Therapy and Research
Purpose While psychological change processes are increasingly assumed to be “non-ergodic”, prompting a shift toward idiographic approaches, the assumption of ergodicity is often accepted a priori rath...
54320
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
"p-Excuses" E.g., p = .056 is “marginally significant” or “close to being significant” 🔹 Most p-excuses are used in psychology. 🔹 The least p-excuses are used in health. Preprint: osf.io/preprints/me... #MetaSci #AcademicSky 🧪
Researchers face incentives to write up their empirical findings in a way that maximizes publication success. We analyze the language of journal articles and its association with statistical significance to explore questionable research practices at the stage of writing up articles, using 140,606 articles from health, biology, psychology, economics, and multidisciplinary journals over 32 years. For most disciplines, a higher share of non-significant main findings is associated with more hedging and negative striking words, fewer positive striking words, and fewer superlatives. We neither find evidence that authors upsell ambiguous results using sensational language nor that ambiguous results are written up less readably. Contrarily, articles with a higher share of statistically significant main findings are written up more sensationally. We find that emphasis on (marginal) statistical significance increases with the share of non-significant main findings, reflecting a dichotomized interpretation of p-values based on arbitrary thresholds. Particularly, p-excuses give the impression of statistical significance when the finding is actually not significant, consistent with the notion of 'spin'. This study provides empirical insights that might help researchers to self-reflect on writing up empirical findings. More training and fewer incentives to sell findings using sensational language and spin can help to improve academic writing.
42411
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 15/11/2025
📚 Improving statistical reporting in psychology www.nature.com/articles/s44...
nature.com
Improving statistical reporting in psychology - Communications Psychology
Practical guidelines for transparent statistical reporting in quantitative psychology are presented, covering key decisions from study planning through results reporting across frequentist, Bayesian, ...
0113
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
When do interaction/moderation effects stabilize in linear regression?: osf.io/35t84
0157
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 23/10/2025
Introducing openESM: A database of openly available experience sampling datasets: osf.io/qfdtb
023
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Juan Ramón @unnombrealazar.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
Para profesorado, por si ayuda a que revisemos nuestras prácticas.
152
Raimundo Aguayo @raguayo.bsky.social · 30/09/2025
¿Tus hipótesis son falsables?compruebalo con este checklist: Evaluate What Is Claimed to Be Confirmed: Initial Version of a Falsification Assessment Form (FAF) | Methodology doi.org/10.5964/meth...
doi.org
Evaluate What Is Claimed to Be Confirmed: Initial Version of a Falsification Assessment Form (FAF)| Methodology
011
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 28/08/2025
“Psychology needs epistemic, methodological, and epistemological pluralism to examine phenomena from different perspectives.” New article by @maddipow.bsky.social #MetaSci #OpenSci
2113
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
MetaArXivBot @metaarxivbot.bsky.social · 28/08/2025
Developments in the field of reliability and agreement studies: a methods review protocol: osf.io/um57k
011
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
"Understanding different types of review articles: A primer for early career researchers." By Ghosh & Choudhury (2025) Open Access: dx.doi.org/10.4103/indi... #AcademicSky #PhDSky #Methodology
45417
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
Perspectival Realism + Ecological Psychology = Ecological Perspectivism "Science offers knowledge of reality in terms of affordances, which are relational to the instruments and abilities of scientific communities." #PhilSci #PsycSci
2216
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 22/08/2025
Just published… I argue that preregistration does not improve the transparent evaluation of the severity of hypothesis tests (a) in Popper’s approach or (b) in Mayo’s error statistical approach when preregistration is treated as “a plan, not a prison.” Open Access: doi.org/10.1007/s112...
One justification for preregistering research hypotheses, methods, and analyses is that it improves the transparent evaluation of the severity of hypothesis tests. In this article, I consider two cases in which preregistration does not improve this evaluation. First, I argue that, although preregistration may facilitate the transparent evaluation of severity in Mayo’s error statistical philosophy of science, it does not facilitate this evaluation in Popper’s theory-centric approach. To illustrate, I show that associated concerns about Type I error rate inflation are only relevant in the error statistical approach and not in a theory-centric approach. Second, I argue that a test procedure that is preregistered but that also allows deviations in its implementation (i.e., “a plan, not a prison”) does not provide a more transparent evaluation of Mayoian severity than a non-preregistered procedure. In particular, I argue that sample-based validity-enhancing deviations cause an unknown inflation of the test procedure’s Type I error rate and, consequently, an unknown reduction in its capability to license inferences severely. I conclude that preregistration does not improve the transparent evaluation of severity (a) in Popper’s philosophy of science or (b) in Mayo’s approach when deviations are allowed.
49515
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Washington Irving @irvingwashington22.bsky.social · 22/08/2025
The paper about splines in R that I wish I had known about when I was learning splines in R. bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com
A review of spline function procedures in R - BMC Medical Research Methodology
Background With progress on both the theoretical and the computational fronts the use of spline modelling has become an established tool in statistical regression analysis. An important issue in splin...
1427
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
Item Construction Rules Revisited: Learnings from Measurement of Latent Variables with Gold-Standard Items: osf.io/r259d
011
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
MetaArXivBot @metaarxivbot.bsky.social · 25/07/2025
A Preliminary Data Analysis Workflow for Meta-Analysis of Dependent Effect Sizes: doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/vfsqx_v1
022
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Björn Siepe @bsiepe.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
I'm excited that our preregistration template for simulation studies is now available on OSF! See below for a brief interview with the Center for Open Science about the template and why we created it..
03710
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Jan R. Boehnke @jrboehnke.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
Quick reminder: "Content validity is defined as the degree to which the content of a measurement instrument adequately reflects the outcome being measured. [...] It is considered to be the most important measurement property". www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... #Psychometrics #COSMIN #HRQL
sciencedirect.com
Content validity: judging the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of an outcome measurement instrument – a COSMIN perspective
Content validity is key when developing a new outcome measurement instrument or selecting an existing measurement instrument. Without good content val…
011
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Oscar Lecuona @oscarlecuona.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
Nos publican! Un artículo divulgativo sobre la crisis de replicación y la revolución de credibilidad, buen material para iniciarse! doi.org/10.5944/ap.2... Taking on dissemination of the #credibilityrevolution we created this educational paper for Spanish-speaking audiences
doi.org
Credibilidad o barbarie: Cómo la crisis de replicación ha desatado una revolución en Psicología y otras ciencias | Acción Psicológica
2117
Reposted by Raimundo Aguayo
Antonio Diéguez @adieguez.bsky.social · 08/03/2025
New Cambridge Element Science, Pseudoscience, and the Demarcation Problem by Dániel Bárdos and Adam Tamas Tuboly. cup.org/41JQR4F
cup.org
Science, Pseudoscience, and the Demarcation Problem
Cambridge Core - Philosophy: General Interest - Science, Pseudoscience, and the Demarcation Problem
2115
Raimundo Aguayo @raguayo.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
Tutorial muy útil para enseñar SEM/CFA en R sin perder de vista las explicaciones conceptuales. doi.org/10.1111/bmsp... Sections
000
Raimundo Aguayo @raguayo.bsky.social · 13/07/2025
2 teorías principales neuropsico-emergentistas sobre la conciencia muestran evidencia a favor y en contra de sus hipótesis, en un estudio preregistrado con investigadores de distintas orientaciones. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness
Multimodal results (iEEG, fMRI and MEG) of predictions from integrated information theory and global neuronal workspace theory align with some predictions of both theories on visual consciousness, but also...
010
Raimundo Aguayo @raguayo.bsky.social · 08/07/2025
A very interesting read journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
000