This week's post is about Hume's "is-ought problem". I argue that this "problem" is largely illusory; all arguments need premises, you can always challenge premises, but there's nothing special about "is" and "ought" here.
patrickjuli.us/2025/01/05/w...
patrickjuli.us
What’s fallacious about naturalism?
Jan 5 JDN 2460681 There is another line of attack against a scientific approach to morality, one which threatens all the more because it comes from fellow scientists. Even though they generally agr…
