Reposted by Peter TulipSupaluminal @supaluminal.bsky.social · 09/10/2026I'm becoming increasingly radicalised against this project. Not the concept of a square so much, but definitely this implementation. Can you really have a European-style square without umbrellas, tables and the ability to buy a beer or wine? 051
Reposted by Peter TulipSupaluminal @supaluminal.bsky.social · 08/10/2026City of Sydney can't be serious with this proposal. These deserve at best a plaque, after they've been demolished and replaced by desperately needed housing for people. 161
Reposted by Peter TulipSydney YIMBY @sydney.yimby.au · 07/10/2026Time for Woollahra to share. Sydney YIMBY Committee Member Dom Behrens in tomorrow's SMH, bringing much needed facts to a discussion desperately in need of it 3158
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 05/10/2026Greater access to finance would increase housing demand and worsen affordability. So we need to remove planning obstacles first. Here are CIS's proposals for reform of housing finance. Where are yours? www.cis.org.au/wp-content/u...cis.org.au 010
Reposted by Peter TulipJamie Hall @jamiehall.cc · 30/09/2026Some Australian voters have seen the Greens’ theory of change fail repeatedly over the last 20 years, despite the Greens promising over and over again that it would work next time—but still intend to vote for them again. And I think you know the exact percentage of voters in that category 252
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 24/09/2026My view? Overcoming opposition (even when it is irrational) requires understanding NIMBYs better. We need Australian research funded by bodies interested in housing affordability. That requires replacing AHURI and NHSAC. 2/2 010
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 24/09/2026Do NIMBYs have good faith objections to density that could be accommodated? Works in Progress has published several suggestions for minimising opposition. But @resnikoff.bsky.social argues that NIMBYs are unreasonable; so compromise won’t work. 1/2 261
Reposted by Peter TulipSydney YIMBY @sydney.yimby.au · 21/09/2026Heritage listing entire suburbs, especially right next to the CBD is incompatible with the aim of housing affordability. The Woollahra plan is a start, but there's plenty of other areas where old buildings are prioritised over people who need housing. www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...smh.com.auHousing and heritage ‘can coexist’ as images reveal how towers would change WoollahraHeritage items would be “generally” kept, and not directly demolished, to build 9400 homes – but there are two bigger risks in sight. 0115
Reposted by Peter TulipSydney YIMBY @sydney.yimby.au · 18/09/2026Rozelle residents raising the dark possibility that surface car parks or storage facilities might be replace with… 👻 homes for people 👻 0143
Reposted by Peter TulipSydney YIMBY @sydney.yimby.au · 10/09/2026While some in the eastern suburbs scream bloody murder over 9800 homes in Woollahra, there’s 13,000 homes on exhibition in Westmead South and barely a peep. Rich areas think they should be able to opt out, we think everywhere should help out Submission guide for Westmead below 2235
Reposted by Peter TulipSydney YIMBY @sydney.yimby.au · 09/09/2026New report from the Aus Public Policy Institute finds that Heritage Conservation Areas constrain housing supply and says there needs to be more accountability for their impacts. We strongly agree! Full report linked below 164
Reposted by Peter TulipSydney YIMBY @sydney.yimby.au · 27/08/2026People want to live in cities, because that's where the economic opportunities are. But our wealthy inner city councils are making life a lot harder than it should be. This is why Sydney YIMBY continues to advocate for more housing where people actually want to live www.smh.com.au/politics/fed... 291
Reposted by Peter TulipSydney YIMBY @sydney.yimby.au · 25/08/2026This is exactly why Sydney YIMBY has been pointing to Auckland as an example for years now. The supply denialists are wrong. The evidence is clear, permitting more housing results in more housing. It's not the only thing we should do, but it might be the most important thing we can do! 1124
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 22/08/2026"These new apartments are expensive; so they won't improve housing affordability." This is one of the most common arguments against new housing. And it is wrong. I have a column in the Canberra Times. cis.org.au/commentary/o... 0224
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 22/08/2026The most important factors driving the demand for housing were 1) population and 2) income. Credit barriers, taxes and lower mortgage rates were minor contributions. None of this would have hurt affordability if we built enough housing, as we did in the 1960s and 1970s. But we made that illegal. 000
Reposted by Peter TulipEvery Sydney Station @sydneystations.bsky.social · 18/08/2026For years now the City of Sydney has sun access rules to prevent the future Town Hall Sq from being in the shadow of tall buildings. We see the first serious renders of the proposed square and everyone goes "there's no shade". 🤦 2113
Reposted by Peter TulipMichael Wiebe @michaelwiebe.bsky.social · 18/08/2026New post: we often hear debates on whether zoning is a constraint on housing supply. Instead of arguing in circles, we can look at the data. www.buildingabundance.ca/p/the-zoning... 1/ 2217
Reposted by Peter TulipEvery Sydney Station @sydneystations.bsky.social · 11/08/2026The Mayor of the Hills Shire continues to rage that the state approves housing around Australia's best new piece of public transport. Meanwhile the Shire is rapidly sprawling out with acres of new McMansions far away from anything, but that's fine apparently. 2203
Reposted by Peter TulipOh The Urbanity! @ohtheurbanity.bsky.social · 09/08/2026People talk about landlords leaving apartments vacant, holding out for higher rent. It’s the same decision as a job-seeker saying: “do I take this offer now or hold out for another job with a better salary?” Sure, you can try that for a time. But most people can’t stay unemployed forever! 6574
Reposted by Peter TulipPhilip Thalis @philipthalis.bsky.social · 05/08/202628 cooperative social housing apartments in Barcelona - would not be allowed in Australia due to so many building & fire regulations; - atrium roof/courtyard enclosure - lift combined with fire stair - exposed timber structure at GF - glazed timber doors & timber cladding to courtyard facades 2194
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 01/08/2026As @ethangilbert.bsky.social noted, you've confused building approvals with development approvals. 010
Reposted by Peter TulipPhilip Thalis @philipthalis.bsky.social · 31/07/2026Canberra’s metro line - Australia’s best light rail project, now being extended, first through city centre to the lake front, & then hopefully to Woden. The remade & beautifully landscaped Northbourne Ave is the model for remaking Adelaide Ave as an urban boulevard - as the Griffins always intended. 5357
Reposted by Peter TulipTravis Jordan @grugstan.bsky.social · 31/07/2026I got so annoyed at Betoota posting about brick six packs I made a slide deck. 2155
Reposted by Peter TulipStephen Kirchner @insteconomics.bsky.social · 31/07/2026Kevin Warsh wants the title, but not the actual job. The job will find him soon enough stephenkirchner.substack.com/p/open-mouth...stephenkirchner.substack.comOpen mouth operations: The case for more forward guidance, not lessWarsh wants the title, but not the actual job. The job will find him anyway 031
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 12/07/2026Recent falls in housing prices are welcome. We should take the win. I have an op-ed in the Canberra Times. www.cis.org.au/commentary/o...cis.org.auStop panicking and don’t listen to pollies. Falling house prices are a win - The Centre for Independent StudiesPETER TULIP: Fretting about housing prices will be useful if it leads to a discussion about where we want prices to go and how to achieve that. 093
Reposted by Peter TulipMatthew Bowes @mbowes.bsky.social · 11/07/2026Australian cities are upzoning to allow for more apartments and townhouses, with the aim of getting more homes built. But policy makers need better tools to assess how effective these policies can be. It all starts with better understanding commercial feasibility. 🧵 142
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 21/06/2026Our urban economics reading group will be discussing More Homes, Better Cities by the Grattan Institute this Wednesday at 6pm at the CIS. DM me for details or to be included on our email list. grattan.edu.au/report/more-... .grattan.edu.auMore homes, better cities: Letting more people live where they wantThree-storey townhouses and apartments should be permitted on all residential land in all capital cities as part of a concerted policy assault on Australia’s housing crisis. 030
Reposted by Peter TulipAbundant Housing Vancouver @ahvancouver.bsky.social · 27/05/2026Want to increase the supply 3+ bedroom homes? Building dense, market-rate apartments with mostly 1-2 bedrooms does just that, resulting in mostly 3+ bedroom vacancies after the second round of moves that were triggered by the new homes. papers.ssrn.com/sol3... 0214
Reposted by Peter TulipGreater Canberra @greatercanberra.org.au · 22/05/2026Today’s decision by the Planning Minister to approve the Missing Middle Housing Reforms marks a turning point for Canberra. 2103
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 21/05/2026This is like arguing which blade of the scissors does the cutting. Rising demand interacts with inelastic supply. 020
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 11/05/2026No. It's because economists respect the evidence. Most economists, including me, want our property values to go down. But we know that the research says removing the tax concessions will not substantially do that. Are you similarly dismissive of the research on climate, vaccination, flouridation? 210
Reposted by Peter Tulipcollie.bsky.social @collie.bsky.social · 11/05/2026Developers do not make money on empty apartments, this is the dumbest theory of housing. 926918
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 07/05/2026I agree Housing is a Human Right. Zoning restrictions, which outlaw extra housing, are a denial of these rights and need to be over-ridden. No-one says supply is the "only explanation". The argument is that extra supply is the best way to improve affordability. We are happy to debate that. 002
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 02/05/2026Genuine question: Do you believe the residents would be better off and would pay higher rent for a different design? In which case, why don't developers exploit that opportunity for more profit? Or is the different design for the benefit of outsiders? 090
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 02/05/2026The sniping and misrepresentation from Tim Sneesby is unconstructive. No-one says "planning is the primary constraint on housing supply". And an author clarifying what his book is not about should not be taken as a rebuttal of what the book actually does say. thefifthestate.com.au/columns/spin...thefifthestate.com.au‘Abundance’ and why trickle-down housing economics just admitted what town planners always knewTrickle-down housing economics just admitted what town planners always knew, argues Tim Sneesby in this article that tackles the truth about housing supply – 95 per cent of applications for developmen... 120
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 24/04/2026Why can't expert researchers justify my wishful thinking? We see this in discussions over climate change, vaccination, flouridation. Now tax. 021
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 09/04/2026Site values are routinely discussed in the industry, being quoted in most development financing agreements. (The land is typically collateral, which needs to be valued). 100
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 09/04/2026Instead of comparing housing need and zoned capacity, a more relevant and actionable comparison is between sale prices and the cost of supply. Or, equivalently, whether upzoning affects land values. 110
Reposted by Peter TulipAndrew Robertson @akhrobertson.bsky.social · 04/04/2026This brilliant article describes the link between Canada’s poor economic growth and our restrictive municipal housing policies. “Canada cannot build a 21st-century economy with a 20th-century housing regime”financialpost.comWhy Canada's housing crisis is a productivity crisis, tooRicardo Hausmann and Eric Protzer: Canada's lack of suitable housing is a social problem, but it can also stymie growth. Read how. 16615
Reposted by Peter TulipJeannie Leverich @jeanniel.bsky.social · 04/04/2026This @ohtheurbanity.bsky.social video provides a great overview of why rent control alone and public housing alone will not solve the housing shortage. The only way out of a housing shortage is to build more housing, both public and market-rate. We need a multi-faceted approach. #a2councilyoutube.comThe Problem With Left-Wing NIMBYismYouTube video by Oh The Urbanity! 0397
Reposted by Peter TulipPhilip Thalis @philipthalis.bsky.social · 31/03/2026The humble & affordable 3 storey walk up flats, so common in 60’s-80’s, can’t be built today; -no lift -needs sprinklers & pumps -slabs too thin -no thermal or acoustic insulation -parking non-compliant -windows too open List goes on & makes housing all the more expensive, esp what should be easy 6286
Reposted by Peter TulipSupaluminal @supaluminal.bsky.social · 30/03/2026Perhaps instead of claiming that student housing is crowding out apartments, Randwick council might consider zoning additional capacity in Kensington and Kingsford? They have the ability to do that www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03...abc.net.au'Perverse': Sydney council wants to ban commercial student housingFor every 10 student rooms being built, there is only one residential property in an area of Sydney's east. The mayor says the housing market has been "monopolised". 2102
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 28/03/2026The main advantage of Build-to-Rent is security of tenure. Renting in Europe or America is more secure than Australia -- because we have the wrong landlords. Mum and Dad investors churn and evict whereas corporate landlords encourage long leases. 010
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 27/03/2026Another paper (among many) finding that inclusionary zoning requirements backfire. In contrast, when I ask advocates of affordable housing requirements for evidence they cannot provide any. 040
Reposted by Peter TulipOh The Urbanity! @ohtheurbanity.bsky.social · 22/03/2026Medium vs High Density: Why Do We Have to Choose?youtu.beMedium vs High Density: Why Do We Have to Choose?YouTube video by Oh The Urbanity! 25411
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 21/03/2026Isn't it simpler to say upzoning moves the red line to the right? 110
Peter Tulip @petertulip.bsky.social · 21/03/2026It's a very good paper. But the main way that "upzoning works to reduce prices" is by reducing the price of existing homes. The new homes are often relatively expensive, even if they have a low land/structure ratio. 120
Reposted by Peter TulipOh The Urbanity! @ohtheurbanity.bsky.social · 19/03/2026The trickiest thing about arguing for more dense housing? Half the people who object say it’ll just be luxury housing for the rich. And the other half say you’re just building undesirable slums no one wants to live in. 1014018
Reposted by Peter TulipHenry Grabar @henrygrabar.bsky.social · 23/02/2026new from me: a story about VACANCY CHAINS, the idea that underlies the argument that more housing is good even if you can't afford it www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...theatlantic.comHigh-End Construction Really Does Help EveryoneA new rung at the top of the housing ladder permits people lower down to climb up. 1026073