Sign in

Paulina Manduch

@paulinamanduch.bsky.social
100 followers 383 following 21 posts

Advisory Board Member @reproducibilitea.org || Current projects: Post-publication reviewing and commenting reproducibilitea.org/jc/2025/11/07/… & reading lists orcid.org/0009-0001-1366-256X

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Tabea Schoeler @tabeasch.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
📣 Join us for the next #ReproTea on 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐬𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞, with Prof. Jennifer M. Heemstra! She’ll be discussing: 💡 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐣𝐨𝐛 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧’𝐭 (𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲) 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫, based on her book 'Labwork to Leadership'. 📅 Wed, 7th October, 4pm (CEST) 💻 Join online here: surl.li/tqccjv
surl.li
Thriving in the Leadership Job You Weren’t (Really) Trained For
Join Prof. Jennifer M. Heemstra for an interactive session exploring the leadership skills needed to thrive in a scientific career.
133
Paulina Manduch @paulinamanduch.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Open Science and Meta-Analyses in Clinical Psychology: Lessons Learned doi.org/10.1177/2167...
000
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
University of Galway Library @uniofgalwaylib.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
ReproducibiliTea Galway Journal Club - The MORPHSS project, With guest introducer Dr. Jenni Adams 🗓 Wed, 7th Oct, 🕑 14.00-15.00 📌Archives & Special Collections Training room. Suitability:All Research levels Register: universityofgalway.libcal.com/event/4562619 #openresearch #openscience
033
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Neuroskeptic @neuroskeptic.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
The word 'empathy' is a broad umbrella term that should be used "more sparingly" pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42789468/ Yes
084
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 28/09/2026
☕️Shape the future of Open Research: Join the ReproducibiliTea Steering Committee for 2027! We are thrilled to announce that applications are officially open to join the ReproducibiliTea Steering Committee starting in early 2027.
11013
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Hurst Publishers @hurstpublishers.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
🩺💭’It wasn’t that people were anti-medicine. Instead, historical injustices1 meant scepticism had become a necessary tool for navigating healthcare.’ Read the interview with @caitjan.bsky.social, author of Healthy Scepticism, in @bmj.com @bmjmedicine.bsky.social 👇 www.bmj.com/content/394/...
bmj.com
Medicine needs critics: Why scepticism is both healthy and important
In a climate of increasing anti-vaccination sentiment and conspiracy theories, scepticism can be perceived as a threat to medical institutions. Historian Caitjan Gainty, author of the new book Healthy...
034
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 22/09/2026
🎉 ReproducibiliTea 2026 Conference | 25 September 2026 “A decade on & decades ahead” Lunch Break & Parallel Journal Clubs | 14:10–16:10 CEST Grab a bite and a warm cup of tea, then join us for interactive discussions! ⇆ Both journal clubs run at the same time in separate rooms.
274
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea Leuven @leuventea.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Can you survive your research? Start the new academic year with a special ReproducibiliTea session featuring the Research Survival Game, developed and hosted by KU Leuven Libraries! 🍵 Tuesday October 20th, 16:00-17:30 Register here: tinyurl.com/reprotealvn
142
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 16/09/2026
🎉 ReproducibiliTea 2026 Conference | 25 September 2026 “A decade on & decades ahead” ☕ Session 2 | 12:30–14:10 Join us for our afternoon session to explore early career leadership, community initiatives, education, and the future of open publishing.
252
Paulina Manduch @paulinamanduch.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
💡 Can open science speak qualitative? Rearticulating open science vocabulary for qualitative research doi.org/10.1080/1478...
doi.org
Can open science speak qualitative? Rearticulating open science vocabulary for qualitative research
‘Open research’ (or ‘open science’) has substantially reshaped conversations surrounding rigor, transparency, and accountability, yet its vocabulary remains largely rooted in quantitative, positivi...
010
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Reference limits can exacerbate biased citation behavior! In my current commentary article on the work of @kaileylawson.bsky.social, @brettmurpsych.bsky.social, et al. (2025), I provide empirical support for this thesis. Now published #OA @collabrapsychology.bsky.social 👉 doi.org/10.1525/coll...
31816
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea Leuven @leuventea.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
As the days slowly get shorter, it's once again time for (Reproducibili)-tea. ☕🍂 Check out the schedule below for our planned sessions around reproducibility and open science, and register to attend. See you around the tea table! ☕ #ReproducibiliTea #OpenScience #ResearchCulture #ResearchIntegrity
042
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training @forrt.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Peer review is a gift researchers give to the field, worth >$1B globally in 2020. Imagine if more of that generosity flowed straight back into the scholar-led journals that make research free to read and free to publish. Help build that future, become a diamond reviewer forrt.org/diamond-reviewer
A hexagonal badge with a diamond and the words "diamond reviewer" below it.
22824
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Adrian Currie @adrian-currie.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide, edited by the inestimable @phieveigl.bsky.social (and me!), has 27 chapters from super-cool philosophers of science explaining how they do their thing, and is now open access! Our baby is free! #philsci direct.mit.edu/books/oa-edi...
direct.mit.edu
Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide
A guidebook to methods and methodology, encouraging deeper engagement across the philosophy of science and beyond.The last twenty years have seen multiple
414873
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Matt Grainger @drmattg.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Meta-analysts ask researchers to share reusable data, but are we leading by example? Great work by @shreyadimri.bsky.social, @asanchez-tojar.bsky.social & more. Of 81 meta-analyses, 68% shared data, only 15% shared code, and none reported a risk-of-bias assessment. ecoevorxiv.org/repository/v...
ecoevorxiv.org
Meta-analysts must lead by example and embrace all FAIR principles
02211
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Malika Ihle @malikaihle.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Please anonymise your data before sharing ! At the @lmu-osc.bsky.social we promote responsible data sharing through data anonymisation, or the creation of synthetic data to share instead of sensitive data. Our self-paced tutorials: lmu-osc.github.io/data-anonymi... lmu-osc.github.io/synthetic-da...
lmu-osc.github.io
Welcome to the Data Anonymization Course! – Data Anonymization Course
02113
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Institute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
1/ What is the prevalence of personally identifiable information (PII) in author-collected data publicly shared in the social sciences? We audited 327 replication packages from 11 leading journals in economics, political science, and psychology Answer: surprisingly high 🧵
25537
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Florian Naudet @floriannaudet.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
🚨 paper alert 🚨 « Open Science Policies and Practices Among Medical Journals » led by Constant Vinatier. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com
Open Science Policies and Practices Among Medical Journals
This cross-sectional study evaluates which open science practices have been adopted by leading general medical journals and whether automated tools can assess article-level adherence.
033
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
It was so much fun to work with Ethan Meimoun on this letter with advice to PhD students for when their studies don't work out, and why this is normal, even if it might not feel like it. It was great to have Ethan around as a lab visitor! www.researchgate.net/publication/...
researchgate.net
(PDF) Why It Is (Probably) Not Your Fault if Your Studies Do Not Work Out
PDF | Early career researchers, because of their role in data collection and analysis, are often first to experience the emotional impact of null or... | Find, read and cite all the research you need…
0133
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 02/09/2026
If you missed last week's Changes to OSF Projects: Overview and Q&A webinar, catch up with the materials linked below. Review what’s changing and why, key dates, and implications for users: 📹 Recording: www.youtube.com/watc... 🖥️ Slides: www.cos.io/hubfs/Ema... ❓ Q&A: www.cos.io/hubfs/OSF...
youtube.com
Changes to OSF Projects: Overview and Q&A
During this webinar, we explained why changes to the OSF are happening, reviewed the key dates and what they mean for users, clarified what will and will not change, and shared practical guidance for preparing for the transition. The second half of the webinar was a moderated Q&A with representative
037
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 26/08/2026
🎉 ReproducibiliTea 2026 Conference | 25 September 2026 “A decade on & decades ahead” ☕ Session 1 | 10:50–11:50 👉 Register for the ReproducibiliTea 2026 Conference and discover the full program, speakers, and session details on our website: 🔗 reproducibilitea.org/conference2026
32213
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Mario Malički @mariomalicki.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
EASE Peer Review Committee invites comments on 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰: 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐄𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐞 docs.google.com/document/d/1.... Responses may be submitted till 15 September on forms.gle/hKJwjwAvHMpB...
021
Paulina Manduch @paulinamanduch.bsky.social · 17/08/2026
Call for new early-career speakers!
011
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Jonathan Peelle @jpeelle.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Yikes “Starting November 16, 2026, no new projects or child components of existing projects can be created on OSF. After February 19, 2027, all public and private OSF projects will become read-only.” www.cos.io/osf-changes
cos.io
OSF Changes | Center for Open Science
We are preparing substantial changes to OSF that will reduce its functionality, focus OSF on its unique strengths, and move toward an integrated model with complementary services. As part of that shif...
31916
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Alexandra Karakas and @tuadam.bsky.social introduce the new book "Scientific Mistakes and Mistaken Science: Malfunction, Error, Failure" link.springer.com/book/10.1007... #PhilSci #HistSci #AcademicScky 🧪
0246
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 30/07/2026
Agree! I find David Lishner's (2022) typology of reasons for non-publication quite useful: doi.org/10.1177/1745...
151
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Gilad Feldman @giladfeldman.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Looking for open-science and meta-research events? Been tracking these in the past month, manual and automated. Encouraging to see that there are quite a few. If you want to see what I'm keeping track of: metaventory.vercel.app/events?view=...
3199
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Alejandro Sandoval-Lentisco @asandovall.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
How often are multiverse analyses implemented, not just cited/discussed? How are they implemented? 🧵 New preprint on the uptake and implementation of multiverse-style analyses 👇 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Uptake and Implementation of Multiverse-style Analyses Across 613 Studies
Empirical conclusions can depend on the many individual choices researchers make when analyzing data. Multiverse-style analyses address this by computing results across a set of specifications rather ...
21917
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Beth Clarke @bethclarke.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
If you had to guess, what proportion of social/personality psych articles include a claim that the findings can be applied in the real world?
53514
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
USB Köln @unibibkoeln.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
#ReproducibiliTea in the HumaniTeas: Please note: change of venue! ➡️ How to do research with 100+ colleagues / Onur Özsoy (@unicologne.bsky.social) ➡️ 16 July 2026, 4.00–5.30 pm, Media Library of the Language Lab (Room -1.208) or via Zoom (uni.koeln/CUDVY) ub.uni-koeln.de/kurse-beratu...
The image shows a cup of tea and two cookies on a small wooden board. Next to it on the left is the blue and white logo of the ReproducibiliTea series with a symbol of a steaming cup of coffee and the text "ReproducibiliTea".
011
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Dorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
outcome switching still a major issue in cohort studies of interventions www.bmj.com/content/393/...
bmj.com
Outcome switching in cohort studies of interventions: meta-epidemiological study
Objectives To study the prevalence and characteristics of outcome switching, the completeness of outcome prespecification, and factors associated with outcome switching in observational cohort studies...
074
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
PREreview @prereview.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
You are all invited for a discussion on pathways for students to contribute to #OpenPeerReview, promote research integrity, and drive change within academic communities. 🔁 Event organized by 2026 PREreview #Champions 🗓️ 25 July, 2026 - 11:00 UTC | 12:00 WAT Register: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
Theme: Empowering Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students as Agents of Change in Peer Review Across All Communities. Speakers: Daniel Adediran & Morlai Sesay. Moderator: Mariama Deborah Kamara. Join us for an inspiring and inpactful session as we explore how undergraduate and postgraduate students can lead real change through peer review in their communities and beyond.
Date: 25 July, 2026. Time: 12:00 PM WAT. Venue: Online. 
Be part of the movement, be an agent of change.
Organized by a cross section of the 2026 PREreview Champions cohort.
011
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
We're developing alternative ways to shorten questionnaires, given psychology's questionable focus on inter-item correlations. We are looking for datasets: - clinical (mental health) - contains diagnosis - contains long form - contains short form Steep requirements, but maybe someone knows smth?
62220
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Tabea Schoeler @tabeasch.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
📢 Join us for the next #ReproT with Prof. Kevin Esterling! He'll be discussing: 💡 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 📅 When: Wednesday 8th July, 3pm (BST) Sign up here: rb.gy/8ptyey @jessiebaldwin.bsky.social @reproducibilitea.org @ukrepro.bsky.social
rb.gy
The necessity of construct and external validity for causal inferernce
What does it take to make a credible causal claim?
065
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea UEA @reproteauea.bsky.social · 04/07/2026
The conversation on tracking and mainstreaming replications, with Dr Lukas Wallrich is now available on our YouTube channel youtu.be/sLi-lMbKLgw
youtu.be
Tracking & Mainstreaming Replications In The Social, Cognitive, And Behavioural Sc
YouTube video by ReproducibiliTEA UEA
111
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 03/07/2026
SEP finally covers #psychotherapy (what counts as one, how it should be evaluated, relation to #wellbeing and #mentalhealth, nature of its expertise). Important work by @plutynski.bsky.social and Megan Delehanty #philsky #ethics #philmed
plato.stanford.edu
Philosophy of Psychotherapy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
1457
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 02/07/2026
Grab your cup ☕; we're spilling the #ReproducibiliTea. Our first-ever international conference. 🗓️Sept 25 | 💻 Online | 🎟️ Free Register now → forms.gle/KgemQ3gM2fEe... 🔗 Learn more: reproducibilitea.org/conference2026 #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity #Reproducibility
01710
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Darren Dahly @statsepi.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
This paper is worth it for table 1 alone. 👏 @sabinehoffmann11.bsky.social @boulesteixlaure.bsky.social et al onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle
Most original articles published in the medical literature report the results of multiple statistical tests. In a few simple cases, there is agreement on whether to adjust for the number of performed...
58428
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
Did a 90 minute webinar workshop for APA on depression measurement. They were kind enough to allow me to share this on youtube. youtu.be/5OwYjWao1hs
youtu.be
What Scale is Best? Understanding Sources of Validity Evidence for Depression Measurement
YouTube video by Eiko Fried
36920
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Mario Malički @mariomalicki.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
Are you a journalist who covers science, health, or environmental issues? We want to hear from you! We are researching how open peer review can help science journalists in their work. We invite you to complete our 5-minute survey here: uva.fra1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...
024
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
European Diamond Capacity Hub @eudch.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
🔎 Looking for participants - #DiamondOA journals study! A recent discussion in the EDCH Forum highlighted a call looking for key actors in #DiamondOA journals to inform an upcoming qualitative study. ➡️ Interested in participating? More details tinyurl.com/2c9fv3tm ➡️ Join the community: forum.edch.eu
022
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
USB Köln @unibibkoeln.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
#ReproducibiliTea in the HumaniTeas: ➡️ Technological measures to deal with sensitive data in reproducible research / Gioele Barabucci (@unicologne.bsky.social ) ➡️ 25.6.226, 16–17.30 Uhr, Zoom (via Mailingliste: lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/list...) #DigitalHumanities ub.uni-koeln.de/kurse-beratu...
Das Bild zeigt eine Tasse Tee und zwei Kekse auf einem kleinen Holzbrett. Links daneben befindet sich das blau-weiße Logo der ReproducibiliTea-Reihe mit einem Symbol einer Tasse dampfenden Kaffees und dem Text "ReproducibiliTea".

The image shows a cup of tea and two cookies on a small wooden board. Next to it on the left is the blue and white logo of the ReproducibiliTea series with a symbol of a steaming cup of coffee and the text "ReproducibiliTea".
111
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea UEA @reproteauea.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
Join our talk with Dr Lukas Wallrich tomorrow on 25 June at 2 pm UK time! @lukaswallrich.bsky.social
221
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 22/06/2026
Did you know that ReproducibiliTea journal clubs can contribute to post-publication reviews? With support from the steering committee, participating journal clubs have access to suggested review targets, peer review guidance, publication venues for commentaries, and funding opportunities.
reproducibilitea.org
Post-publication reviewing by ReproducibiliTea journal clubs
Our ReproducibiliTea community consists of journal clubs organised and joined mainly by early career researchers who discuss journal articles on a regular basis, sometimes even resembling the act of p...
193
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Ellie Bastos Degobi @elliebastos.bsky.social · 19/06/2026
Someone here works with the intersection of mental health & measurement & or metascience? I'm looking for a few collaborators for a project that uses Large Language Models. Feel free to get in touch.
003
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Dr Mircea Zloteanu 🌺🌞🍃 @mzloteanu.bsky.social · 18/06/2026
#statstab #555 To Be FAIR: Theory Specification Needs an Update Thoughts: what's the use of better stats if our theories are nonsense? #theory #metascience #fair #epistemology #research journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
041
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Research on Research Association @roration.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
We're excited to launch J·ROR, the Journal of Research on Research. A new open-access home for research on how research is funded, organised, conducted, communicated, and evaluated. Our first editorial: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... #ResearchOnResearch #MetaScience #OpenScience #STS
tandfonline.com
Introducing the Journal of Research on Research (J·ROR): aligning constellations and communities
Published in Journal of Research on Research (Vol. 1, No. 1, 2026)
47840
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Dorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 01/06/2026
Just a reminder: The free online version of Evaluating What Works has been migrated from bookdown to posit, and is now available here: dorothybishop-evaluating-what-works.share.connect.posit.cloud Hard copy available for purchase here: www.routledge.com/Evaluating-W... #intervention
dorothybishop-evaluating-what-works.share.connect.posit.cloud
Evaluating What Works
Introduction to methods for evaluating effectiveness of non-medical interventions
0209
Reposted by Paulina Manduch
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
What do you think is your most under-recognised paper and why should people be paying more attention? Go on, take the chance to toot your own horn 🎺
4146