Sign in

André Bittermann

@abitter.bsky.social
280 followers 255 following 51 posts

Senior researcher in Metascience @zpid.bsky.social, PhD, psychologist, interested in researcher behavior and science mapping, using bibliometrics, natural language processing, and computational methods

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by André Bittermann
Beth Clarke @bethclarke.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Come work on a PhD in Metascience with me! There’s just a little over one week left to apply!
02522
Reposted by André Bittermann
Justin Sulik @justinsulik.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
We have a new preprint that underscores some key claims here: even if one *can* design an agent that gets through a survey fine, it doesn't follow that such agents are undetectable or common. We find that they are far from common! Preprint link in thread👇
1178
Reposted by André Bittermann
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
New preprint! 🎉 I analysed 1660 papers from 4 psychology journals and found materials sharing went from 9% of papers in 2015 to 82% in 2025, and these materials *do* get downloaded — a median of 135 times each. BUT shared code is often hard to run. doi.org/10.31234/osf... Let's walk through it 🧵
Two-panel figure. Panel a is a flow diagram tracking 1,611 empirical psychology articles from publication year (545 in 2015, 552 in 2020, 514 in 2025) to repository-link type: 785 link an OSF project, 85 link another platform, and 741 link no repository. Of those with an OSF link, download counts were retrieved for 670 and not retrieved for 115. Panel b is a line chart of the share of empirical papers linking OSF across 2015, 2020 and 2025. The overall rate, shown as a dashed black line, rises from 9% to 57% to 82%. All four journals rise steeply and end close together: Psychological Science 92%, JESP 89%, JML 83%, Cognition 76%, with Psychological Science highest throughout.Three-panel figure. Panel a: ridgeline plot of downloads per file by material type on a log scale, with the percentage never downloaded labelled for each — archive 16% of 545 files, documents 20% of 2,970, code 12% of 3,471, other 17% of 1,646, data 21% of 10,051, media 35% of 2,120, images 35% of 4,102. Most files cluster between 1 and 10 downloads, with long right tails past 100. Panel b: ridgeline plot of downloads per paper by journal, log scale, with dashed median lines; Psychological Science is highest, then JESP, JML and Cognition. Panel c: stacked bars showing, for documents, data and code separately, the share of papers by download band (0, 1–10, 11–100, more than 100) in 2015, 2020 and 2025. The share exceeding 100 downloads falls sharply over time in all three types, from roughly two-thirds in 2015 to a quarter or less in 2025, as the 1–10 band grows.Four-panel figure. Panel a: statistical languages detected among 333 papers with retrievable code — R 88%, SPSS 12%, Stata 4%, SAS 1%. Panel b: code red flags among those 333 papers — 34% hard-code an absolute path, 40% reference a missing file — above documentation among 672 OSF-linked papers — 21% have a README, 30% are documented by README, description or wiki. Panel c: among 562 Elsevier papers with no repository link, 44% (245) host at least one journal supplementary file but only 14% (77) host data, code or an archive. Panel d: composition of those 448 hosted files — documents 52%, data 21%, media 9%, other 7%, archive 6%, code 3%, images 1%. The code panels are green, the journal-supplement panels blue.Coefficient plot (download predictors)

Dot-and-whisker plot of three standardised predictors of OSF download volume, each with a 95% confidence interval. Repository size (number of files) has the largest effect at about 0.76, citations about 0.38, and altmetric attention about 0.12. All three intervals sit entirely above zero, so each predicts more downloads, with repository size roughly twice the effect of citations and six times that of attention. X-axis: standardised effect, −0.2 to 1.0.
4264111
Reposted by André Bittermann
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
And if you want to see how your OSF repos compare against this corpus in terms of usability try my OSF reusability checker app. This app also provides tips if it flags any potential issues dsquintana.shinyapps.io/osf-reusabil...
Screenshot of a web app called the OSF Reusability Checker. A panel on the left takes OSF project links or IDs, with a checkbox for "Also inspect code" and a Check button. On the right, results for one project, kd6p8: it contains data or code, is documented, and has retrievable code. A percentile chart shows its 21 downloads at the 10th percentile for projects of its age, 0.2 times what a repository that age typically gets. Below, three bars compare it with published psychology projects: documented (30% of 672 projects) — this repo yes; hard-coded path (34% of 333 with code) — no; loads a missing file (40% of 333 with code) — no. A results table lists 21 downloads, age-adjusted percentile 10, reuse score 4 out of 4, cleanup "clean", and "looks good".Screenshot of one row from the OSF Reusability Checker's results table, for project rxphw (one of mine!). It has 1,558 downloads, placing it at the 98th percentile for repositories of its age, but scores only 2 out of 4 on reuse, with the cleanup verdict "needs data/code added". The "what to fix" column reads: 6 scripts hard-code a file path — use here::here(); 6 missing files, including 3 data files — deposit them, or add a data-availability statement if access is restricted.
1126
Reposted by André Bittermann
Science Magazine @science.org · 16/09/2026
As #AI’s capabilities grow, researchers and publishers are exploring how it can support peer review—and where it still falls short. Learn more during #PeerReviewWeek: scim.ag/4y267b6
Can AI help solve the peer-review crisis? Here are its promises and pitfalls
Amid a shortage of human reviewers, tests indicate AI can assist—but is not a savior
4116
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Reference limits can exacerbate biased citation behavior! In my current commentary article on the work of @kaileylawson.bsky.social, @brettmurpsych.bsky.social, et al. (2025), I provide empirical support for this thesis. Now published #OA @collabrapsychology.bsky.social 👉 doi.org/10.1525/coll...
31816
Reposted by André Bittermann
Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 13/09/2026
Article now retracted. Retraction notice focuses on data sharing, but doesn't mention - the ethics review body is the author's own company - the tech used to to collect the data by intercepting users' LLM prompts does not exist ht @grinschglsandra.bsky.social psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
psycnet.apa.org
APA PsycNet
511435
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
What a nice final to our #bibliometrics project on digital prompting in education: My dear Leibniz colleague Jasmin Breitwieser from @dipfaktuell.bsky.social and I presented our work at #DGPs2026! Today, we focused on our paper identification workflow. Paper in EDPR: 👉 doi.org/10.1007/s106...
042
Reposted by André Bittermann
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Finally, at #DGPs2026, our very competent intern Amelie Kröger presents bibliometric analyses (with @abitter.bsky.social) showing that #SciComm research has become increasingly dynamic and responsive to societal challenges over the years. Psychology‘s role in this field is growing. 📣 #SciReLab
Amelie Kröger presents her poster „Hot Topics in Science Communication Research and Psychology‘s Contribution“
062
Reposted by André Bittermann
Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID) @zpid.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
„Populist politics as a threat to academic freedom - Where do we stand?“ 🙌🏼 So important, to discuss! Currently on the panel: @kaisassenberg.bsky.social @lenahahn.bsky.social @lewan.uk Dieter Frey & G.-Jürgen Hogrefe @dgps.bsky.social #DGPs2026 #zpid @unitrier.bsky.social
Panel beim DGPs Kongress 2026
0125
Reposted by André Bittermann
Institute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
1/ What is the prevalence of personally identifiable information (PII) in author-collected data publicly shared in the social sciences? We audited 327 replication packages from 11 leading journals in economics, political science, and psychology Answer: surprisingly high 🧵
25437
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
When you apply for an academic position in psych, which criteria should be used to evaluate your work? Make your voice count in our brief survey (6-7min)! 👉https://tinyurl.com/zpid-indicators When you're at #DGPs2026 this week, you can get a free @zpid.bsky.social mug! #ResearchAssessment #CoARA
145
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Gave my best to step in for @marlephie.bsky.social and moderate her #PsychologyOfScience session at #DGPs2026. Very cool talks showcasing psychological perspectives on science by @kduermeier.bsky.social, @moritzingendahl.bsky.social, @fbrotzeller.bsky.social and @justinsulik.bsky.social !
1112
Reposted by André Bittermann
Beth Clarke @bethclarke.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
I’m hiring a PhD student to work with me on metascience in psychology at @zpid.bsky.social! The position is very open - could cover a wide range of topics/themes 🤸🏻‍♀️✨ If you have questions, please reach out! Applications are open until October 1st. leibniz-psychology.onlyfy.jobs/en/job/fyjwt...
leibniz-psychology.onlyfy.jobs
PhD in Psychological Meta-Science (m/f/d)
Become part of the open science movement The Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID) in Trier (Germany) is an internationally recognized research-based psychology service center located in...
36157
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lena Hahn @lenahahn.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Excited and looking forward to the panel discussion with @kaisassenberg.bsky.social @evalottabrakemeier.bsky.social @rimamrahal.bsky.social @lewan.uk & G.-J. Hogrefe on populist politics as a threat to academic freedom at #DGPs2026 📆Wednesday, 9 September, 🕧1:45PM, 📍 Room Plenary 1 #psychscisky
Populist politics as a threat to academic freedom - Where do we stand? What? Panel discussion, When? Wednesday, 9 September 2026, 1:45-2:45pm, Where? Room Plenary 1 at the 54. DGPs Congress in Luxemburg. Below this information are pictures of Eva-Lotta Brakemeier, G.-Jürgen Hogrefe, Lena Hahn, Stephan Lewandowsky, Rima Maria Rahal and Kai Sassenberg.
0148
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
It was not only an honor, but also so much fun to supervise this outstanding phd student! @cspetrule.bsky.social presents a unique mix of #SciSci and #Translational #PsychotherapyResearch. His thesis will be soon available online, incl. a framework for property-based assessment of research fields
030
Reposted by André Bittermann
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 15/08/2026
New Blog post: Which Data Repository Should you Use? In light of OSF closing down, I compare Zenodo, Dataverse, ResearchBox, PsychArchive, and local repositories on six important dimensions. If you want to know which to pick: It depends! daniellakens.blogspot.com/2026/08/whic...
daniellakens.blogspot.com
Which Data Repository Should You Use?
The Center for Open Science has announced that from November 16, 2026, no new projects can be created on the Open Science Framework. After F...
4197111
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
While the OSF remains the market leader on preregistrations, there are numerous tools that I can highly recommend for other parts of the research process. Here is a brief overview. I’m happy about suggestions!
Diagram titled "Open Science Infrastructure: Current Services for Psychologists," categorized across four research stages:

Planning:
• OSF: State-of-the-art platform with InternetArchive mirrors + templates.
• PsychArchives: Includes the elaborate PRP-QUANT and PRP-QUAL templates.
• Zenodo: No modifications possible after 30 days.

Materials and Data:
• Zenodo: Elaborate meta-data formats, contribution types, communities, etc.
• PsychArchives: Private and public content + anonymization for peer review.
• Footnote: Browse more repositories at re3data.org.

Publication:
• Zenodo: Not indexed in Google Scholar.
• PsychArchives: Linking with many objects possible.
• PsyArXiv: Psychology's biggest preprint server.
• Footnote: Browse preprint servers on Wikipedia's list; look for DOA journals at DOAJ.

Communication and Teaching:
• Zenodo and PsychArchives listed.
• Footnote: Browse OERs in the OER World Map.
0154
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lisa Spitzer @lspitzer.bsky.social · 06/08/2026
Together with @forrt.bsky.social, we’re building community-driven, consensus-based best-practice guidelines for #psychology, starting with #preregistration! More info: forrt.org/best-practic... Join the project (e.g. our preregistration sub-task force) here: forms.gle/2h4XPX3wQqZ6... #OpenScience
083
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Zum Kick-Off von psychporta.org, dem brandneuen Suchportal von @zpid.bsky.social für Psychologie-Forschungsobjekte, gab ich eine kurze (und der Hitzewelle angepasste) Keynote zur Rolle von #Metascience und #Metadata in Zeiten der #Informationskrise mediacenter.leibniz-psychology.org/view?m=H15gd...
mediacenter.leibniz-psychology.org
André Bittermann: High-quality metascience runs on high-quality metadata
André Bittermann: High-quality metascience runs on high-quality metadata Die sogenannte dritte Informationskrise der Menschheit, hervorgerufen durch Digitalisierung, Internet und künstliche Intellige...
050
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
Recently, I have received more and more invitations to review #bibliometric studies that are essentially just static versions of bibliometric tools, such as VOSviewer and CiteSpace. A great piece on how to write better bibliometric reviews is Hulland's (2024) editorial: doi.org/10.1007/s117...
doi.org
Bibliometric reviews—some guidelines - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science -
111
Reposted by André Bittermann
Beth Clarke @bethclarke.bsky.social · 03/07/2026
Very excited to announce that I’ll be joining @zpid.bsky.social in Trier, Germany as a tenure-track Jun.-Prof. in Psychological Metascience in November! 🤸🏻‍♀️✨
1812716
Reposted by André Bittermann
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 03/07/2026
Now @lenazohm.bsky.social shares her research on expert trespassing: people do - at least somewhat - recognize it when scientists transgress the boundaries of their expertise and this might lead to (small) losses of trust. #SciReLab
274
Reposted by André Bittermann
Whitney Agunyego @wagunyego.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
Had a great time presenting my current work on epistemic injustice and trust in science at my first #EASP2026. Thanks for all the feedback! Happy to be part of the conference!
0133
Reposted by André Bittermann
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Bringing together psychology of science, computational methods, and social psych to explain how social influence spreads within academic (online) communities: It’s not so much single academic influencers but the community that drives change. Great talk by @abitter.bsky.social at #EASP2026! 🤓
André talks about his research on how researchers switched from X to Mastodon - it wasn’t single “influencers” but the community that drove the change.
092
Reposted by André Bittermann
Stephen Turner @stephenturner.us · 24/06/2026
How to give a bad talk www.nature.com/articles/s41...
How to give a bad talk https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-026-00954-8
38225
Reposted by André Bittermann
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
🚨JOB ALERT🚨 3 YEAR POSTDOC in #SciComm research at @zpid.bsky.social! @kaisassenberg.bsky.social and me are searching for a postdoc with background in psychology or communication science. Own research ideas are welcome! Focus should be on societies' preparation for future pandemics. Please share!
leibniz-psychology.onlyfy.jobs
Application Process
Apply now
11620
Reposted by André Bittermann
Gilad Feldman @giladfeldman.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
⚡ Metaventory: building better science ⚡ Had many discussions about the need for mapping out all that's meta-science: people, tools, events, jobs, simulations, etc. in one place. Metaventory aims to help connect those interested in meta-science & improving science. metaventory.vercel.app
22716
Reposted by André Bittermann
Michael J. Kane @michaeljkane.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
I've also found this shinyapp tool to be useful as a reference checker in manuscript reviewing: drkap.shinyapps.io/APA_Cheat_Ca...
drkap.shinyapps.io
APA Reference Validator
135
Reposted by André Bittermann
Michael Okun @michael-okun.bsky.social · 10/06/2026
I’ve officially resigned as Associate Editor for Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. It used to be a reputable journal, but became a case study in how forced automation destroys academic integrity. 👇
5435871430
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lisa Spitzer @lspitzer.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
Join our Mini-Hackathon and help us draft community-driven best-practice guidelines for preregistration!✨ 🗓️ Friday, June 5, 4-6 PM CET 📍 Zoom Register by indicating your interest in participating in the #prereg community events here: forms.gle/yrmK8Wnd4oqw... @zpid.bsky.social @forrt.bsky.social
forms.gle
Best-Practice Guidelines for Psychology
Thank you for your interest in being part of our community project "Best Practices in Psychology"! For more information on the project, please refer back to our website: https://forrt.org/best-practic...
086
Reposted by André Bittermann
Association for Psychological Science @psychscience.bsky.social · 19/05/2026
Generative AI and LLMs are rapidly transforming research, and psychological scientists are figuring out how to use them responsibly. Here are nine articles from AMPPS that offer practical tutorials, frameworks, and cautionary insights for researchers. #AI #AcademicSky
psychologicalscience.org
How Should Psychologists Use AI and Big Data? Nine Guides Point the Way
Practical tutorials, frameworks, and cautionary insights for researchers navigating this new terrain.
143
Reposted by André Bittermann
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 19/05/2026
🚨THREATENED BY SCIENCE🚨People often reject science at odds with their prior beliefs. In three studies, we now show that much of this can be explained by feelings of threat and we test how affirmations in #SciComm might help alleviate such threats. Now out in Public Understanding of Science! 🧵1/4
doi.org
1143
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lena Hahn @lenahahn.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
Excited and looking forward to the symposium with @kaisassenberg.bsky.social & @marlephie.bsky.social on Transparency in the Research Cycle at #APS26BCN. If you are interested in #openscience and #metasci save the date: 📆Firday, 29 May, 🕧12:30PM, 📍 Room 125 (P1 Level, CCIB) #psychscisky
Picture with tha logo of the conference and pictures of the authors
084
Reposted by André Bittermann
Jeff Greene @jeffgreene.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
A clear gap in "#GenAI for learning" applications is a failure to understand scaffolding and the role of digital prompts in promoting not just knowledge but also agency internalization. This article has a helpful framework for bridging this gap. #GenAI companies would learn much from this article.
doi.org
Digital Prompting in Education: A Design Framework and Bibliometric Analysis - Educational Psychology Review
Digital prompts are brief instructional cues designed to guide student learning. The variety of ways in which prompts are designed and labelled across education result in conceptual and…
051
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
Tomorrow at Online #SIPS2026, I'll be presenting a bibliometric case study of two top-tier psychology journals, indicating effects of reference limits on citation diversity. How to ensure both accuracy and inclusiveness in referencing? I'll pitch an idea. 🕗May 6 | 08:45 AM (EDT) | 14:45 (Berlin)
Removing Reference Limits and Introducing Reference Evaluation
030
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
Happy to share that our bibliometric collaboration work with the Individualized Interventions Lab @dipfaktuell.bsky.social @garvinbrod.bsky.social has been published in EdPsyRev! 🎉 We propose a guiding framework that conceptualizes digital prompts as dynamic scaffolds. 🔓 #OA doi.org/10.1007/s106...
doi.org
Digital Prompting in Education: A Design Framework and Bibliometric Analysis - Educational Psychology Review
Digital prompts are brief instructional cues designed to guide student learning. The variety of ways in which prompts are designed and labelled across education result in conceptual and terminological inconsistencies that make it difficult to integrate research findings. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) has introduced a new dominant meaning of the term “prompt” that complicates the discoverability of relevant literature. To address these challenges, we propose a guiding framework that conceptualizes digital prompts as dynamic scaffolds and characterizes their instructional design through a typology of content, function, presentation, and source. Using a bibliometric approach, we analyzed 1,238 publications to examine how well this framework captures the structure of the field. We identified 283 distinct prompt labels, most of which were used in only one publication. The mapping of these labels onto the proposed typology led to a refined understanding of prompt design characteristics. Furthermore, we examined co-occurrences between labels and identified research topics and citation practices. The resulting patterns revealed two major research clusters centered on metacognitive and self-explanation prompts, which structure much of the literature. However, these two clusters lack integration. We show how these separate research traditions can be integrated into our framework of dynamic scaffolding through prompts. Finally, we demonstrate how our typology of prompt types can foster greater terminological coherence and improve search strategies in the age of AI.
131
Reposted by André Bittermann
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
Selecting an effect size for power analysis is hard. Many researchers fall back on Cohen's thresholds, but they have no empirical basis and vary wildly by field. Our new paper offers a better option: field-specific effect size distributions built from meta-analytic data doi.org/10.3758/s134...
Abstract
Effect sizes are useful for understanding the magnitude of study results and for planning new studies via power analysis.
However, despite their wide usage, effect sizes are often misinterpreted. This is mostly due to an over-reliance on general
effect size benchmarks that were not intended for broad application across diverse research fields. Inaccurate effect size
interpretations can lead to incorrect conclusions about the magnitude of study results and incorrect sample size estimates,
thereby increasing the likelihood of false-positive results. This article introduces the ESDist R package, which is designed
to calculate empirically derived effect-size benchmarks or a range of reliably detectable empirical effect sizes for a specific
research question or field of interest by computing effect size distributions (ESDs). This package can be used on data that
can be easily extracted from pre-existing meta-analyses to help researchers more accurately plan new studies or to better
understand how an individual study might relate to other studies in their field. ESDist includes a set of features that make it
easy to use in a priori power analysis. Moreover, the package includes a feature for estimating effect size benchmarks that
account for publication bias and are weighted by effect sizes' variances, which addresses existing limitations of using ESDs
for study planning or interpretation.
316175
Reposted by André Bittermann
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 26/04/2026
Come join me and others at this year’s interdisciplinary and international metascience summer school (Aug 23-28, deadline May 22)! Looking forward to collaborate! 🤓
bihealth.org
1127
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
🚀 PsychTopics, the #RShiny app from @zpid.bsky.social, has new features! 1️⃣ Labels are automatically assigned using our R package topiclabels 🤖 2️⃣The RollingLDA topics are automatically split when a new topic emerges 📈 👉 Check it out: abitter.shinyapps.io/psychtopics
A screenshot of the PsychTopics "Browse Topics" page, with the topiclabels R package logo as an overlay
120
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lisa Spitzer @lspitzer.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
Our #RegisteredReport investigating the restrictiveness of #preregistrations based on the PRP-QUANT Template, is now published in AMPPS!🎉 DOI: doi.org/10.1177/2515... @pci-regreports.bsky.social @zpid.bsky.social #OpenScience
doi.org
Stage 2 Registered Report: Restriction of Researcher Degrees of Freedom Through the Psychological Research Preregistration-Quantitative Template - Lisa Spitzer, Amelie Kroeger, Stefanie Mueller, 2026
Preregistration can help to restrict researcher degrees of freedom and thereby ensure the integrity of research findings. However, its ability to restrict such ...
03013
Reposted by André Bittermann
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
We are inviting applications for a two-year postdoctoral position in a collaborative meta-science project on the effectiveness of data and code sharing policies in research-performing organizations. www.tue.nl/en/working-a...
tue.nl
Postdoc In Meta-science
Personal type: Scientific staff
15265
Reposted by André Bittermann
Frederic R. Hopp @fhopp.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Moral psychology flourishes because of our variation in moral values both within and across cultures. I'm happy to see that our registered report protocol for developing and validating the MFQ-2 in German populations is out now! Next up: Data collection and analysis ⚖️ 💻
journals.plos.org
Validation of the moral foundations questionnaire-2 (MFQ-2) in Germany: Psychometric properties and associations with political ideology, religiosity, and personality
Cross-cultural moral psychology requires robust, validated measures. The Moral Foundations Questionnaire-2 (MFQ-2) is a recent revision of the original MFQ that offers improved assessment of moral int...
0166
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lena Hahn @lenahahn.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Since April 1st, 2024, cannabis is legal in Germany – no April fool's joke! In our new publication (with @doomed-generation.bsky.social & @kaisassenberg.bsky.social), we ask: What are antecedents of recreational cannabis consumption? 🧵 doi.org/10.1177/0047...
doi.org
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
155
Reposted by André Bittermann
Kai Sassenberg @kaisassenberg.bsky.social · 19/03/2026
New preprint available: Transparency and open data are important. In contrast to Elson et al. (2026) doi.org/10.31234/osf..., who have called for non-anonymized data in metascience, we argue for a more nuanced approach to prevent unjustified harm for authors of original work doi.org/10.31234/osf...
doi.org
OSF
194
Reposted by André Bittermann
Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID) @zpid.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
1.000 Follower auf Bluesky 🎉 Vielen Dank für euer Interesse, eure Diskussionen und eure Unterstützung! Auf die nächsten Meilensteine 🚀 1,000 followers on Bluesky 🎉 Thank you for being part of our community and for engaging with our work! #psychology #ZPID
155
Reposted by André Bittermann
Lena Hahn @lenahahn.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
How strong is the threat to academic freedom? If you are a publishing psychologist, please help us get a better understanding of the threats due to external pressure and self-censorship in the publication process by taking our 5-10 min anonymous survey: t1p.de/t1qof Results will be shared here!
11314
Reposted by André Bittermann
Balazs Aczel @balazsaczel.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Our lab has the capacity to test ~500 uni students each semester If you’re a researcher in cognitive psychology or metascience and need data collection support, we’d love to collaborate. We can help collect high-quality data from a large student sample. Get in touch to discuss potential projects!
32621
Reposted by André Bittermann
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
Dear colleagues - we want to better understand perceptions of data fraud and its detection and need your support! Are you currently a #researcher in #psych (or related fields) working with #data? Perfect - please respond to & share this short study (7min): sosci.rlp.net/detection/?r... Thank you!! 🫶
sosci.rlp.net
Fragebogen | Seite 1
11417
Reposted by André Bittermann
Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID) @zpid.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
Thank you, @theo.io! We found ourself on your formidable bluesky-map.theo.io into the Group of German research Institutions - that's it! #zpid #research #psychology
MAP MIT DEM ZPID IN DER GRUPPE DER GERMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
035