iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Carter Rubin @carterrubin.com · 19/05/2026

Woohoo! @metrolosangeles.bsky.social credit/debit card payments are now live!!!

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Streets For All @streetsforall.org · 08/02/2026

Hey Caltrans better not to ignore elected officials & advocates all asking for the same thing: Build 3 blocks of protected 🚲 lanes connecting Ohio to Ohio during your repaving project You CAN do this but are refusing to. No more excuses! 🎥 @carterrubin.com @mobilityforwho.bsky.social

1398

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Carter Rubin @carterrubin.com · 02/03/2026

Nice work by CM Katy Yaroslavsky to get coffee kiosks in all the new Metro D Line stations opening in May! cdn.mc-weblink.sg-mktg.com/weblink/MTc3...

29220

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 14/11/2025

Metro is seriously considering barely funding Ciclavia for the next cycle, and you should click the link below to tell them to get it together: us4.campaign-archive.com?u=e06b221ec7...

us4.campaign-archive.com

Tell Metro to fully fund CicLAvia

041

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Josiah Mortimer @josiahmortimer.bsky.social · 30/09/2025

Some good news. London is meeting legal limits for toxic NO2 pollution for the first time – almost 200 years earlier than predicted – following the Mayor’s "world leading air pollution policies," City Hall announces. The Ultra Low Emissions Zone - and similar policies - really do work.

2347961427

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 19/09/2025

Can’t wait for bozo not to be the face of our city anymore. Soon…

020

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Ned Resnikoff @resnikoff.bsky.social · 03/06/2025

Peak NIMBY brain is trying to keep a neighboring airport open, even though the planes that land there are literally spraying toxins over your home, because if the airport closes then they're going to build affordable housing there. lapublicpress.org/2025/06/sant...

lapublicpress.org

Santa Monica's elite are using an airport to block affordable housing

A campaign to build housing on the site of the soon-to-be-shuttered airport is drawing pushback from opponents of new development.

191245289

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Zennon Ulyate-Crow @zennonuc.bsky.social · 04/06/2025

Look at the difference between NorCal and SoCal. In the Bay, out of the 11 Senators repping urban areas, 8 voted yes. In LA County, out of 13 Senators only 4 voted yes. The LA delegation is killing housing bills.

916523

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Gravel Influencer @gravelinfluencer.bsky.social · 23/05/2025

A quote that really stuck with me from this episode is: "Mobility is about more than transportation, mobility is about access to life."

35711

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 09/05/2025

Kids taking over the streets is the ultimate revolution.

072

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Warren Wells, AICP @warrenjwells.bsky.social · 08/05/2025

10 year after the launch of Vision Zero in Los Angeles, an audit of the program was completed and released. The result? A damning indictment. The Vision Zero Steering Committee stopped meeting in 2018!!

While the Department of Transportation leads the city’s Vision Zero work, nearly every related project requires the participation of other agencies, including Engineering, Street Services, the LAPD and more.

In his directive establishing the program, Garcetti envisioned a Vision Zero Steering Committee made up of representatives from departments citywide to coordinate the implementation of traffic safety projects.

By mid-2018, that committee had stopped meeting, the audit found. The reduction in participation resulted in the loss of a “useful forum to collaborate on Vision Zero goals and nothing quite replaced this level of interaction,” the audit said.

The last time the Department of Transportation revised its action plan, the document that coordinates projects across city agencies, was in 2018.

The audit identified 56 “actions and strategies” from that plan that were meant to be completed by the end of 2020, including projects focused on street design and lighting and Vision Zero education campaigns.

Half of those projects remain incomplete as of the end of 2023, the audit found.

According to interviews the audit is based on, “the level of enthusiasm at City Hall” for Vision Zero has decreased since the program was launched.

“Some of the reasons cited include the pandemic, conflicts of personality, lack of total buy-in for implementation, disagreements over how the program should be administered and scaling issues,” the audit said.

68612

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Streets For All @streetsforall.org · 25/04/2025

The Mayor’s proposed budget is a disaster for street safety. It will result in worse sidewalks, worse pavement condition, no new road safety projects, and may even lead to the end of popular events like CicLAvia. Make your voice heard! mailchi.mp/streetsforal...

0197

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Sam @samd.bsky.social · 24/04/2025

LMFAO THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ACCIDENTALLY SUBMITTED A LETTER TO THE COURT ADMITTING THEY’RE PROBABLY GOING TO LOSE THE LAWSUIT TO STOP CONGESTION PRICING these guys are so incompetent it’s unbelievable storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

The Court Is Unlikely To Uphold FHWA's Stated Rationale for Terminating the CBDTP
Agreement
The Secretary provides two reasons why the CBDTP is not an eligible pilot project under the VPPP statutory language: (1) the program constitutes impermissible "cordon pricing," which is not authorized because it does not offer a toll-free option, and (2) the level of CBDTP tolls has been set primarily by the need to raise revenues rather than prevent congestion. Neither of these reasons is likely to convince the Court:
First, with respect to the rationale that "cordon pricing" is not authorized under the phrase
"congestion pricing" or "value pricing," we have been unable to identify a compelling legal argument to support this position. As you are aware, the legislation that enacted the VPPP, Section
1012(b) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), Pub. L. 102-240 (1991)
(23 U.S.C. § 149 note), as amended by Section 1216(a) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21s Century (TEA-21), Pub. L. 105-178 (1998) (when the term "value pricing" replaced
"congestion pricing" in 1998, the two terms were used synonymously), and Section 1604(a) of the Safe Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Pub. L. 109-59 (2005), does not define "value pricing." Under Loper Bright Enterprises v.
Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369 (2024), the Court will not afford the Secretary's current interpretation any deference, and will engage in its own interpretation of whether cordon pricing is included within the term value pricing. The factors that the court will look at in making this decision point towards the conclusion that the type of cordon pricing utilized in the CBDTP is included within the terms "congestion pricing" or "value pricing."

1155893

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Brianna @briannaje.bsky.social · 22/04/2025

During your lunch break, please call the following senators offices in support of SB 79: Grayson, Cortese, Caballero, Padilla.

0195

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

California YIMBY @cayimby.bsky.social · 22/04/2025

The opposition speaks: "The state does pretty well at producing market rate housing" to audible laughter from the audience.

513315

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 12/04/2025

Join us tomorrow for a ride to and from WeHo, and hangs at Brew Works after!

041

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 28/03/2025

If you dare to ask CalTrans how they expect cyclists to come back when they only put a bike lane in one direction on a deadly highway, they tell you there’ll be crosswalks, and bike lanes in other segments. We’re doing great.

1141

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 21/03/2025

A driver just tailgated me and sprayed me with his windshield wipers because I had the audacity to take the lane for 12 seconds so that I could make a left turn. I even crossed a double yellow to merge early and get out of his way. Yes, cyclist entitlement is definitely the problem 🤡

2161

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Streets For All @streetsforall.org · 17/03/2025

2015: woman killed (life lost and millions paid out in a wrongful death lawsuit) 2017: street is reconfigured 2017: Eric Garcetti forces @mikebonin.bsky.social to remove the safety improvements 2021: mother killed crossing same street w/her son Yesterday: www.latimes.com/california/s...

latimes.com

Car careens off road in crash near Dockweiler Beach, killing a pedestrian

A pedestrian was killed after a car involved in a collision went over the side of the road in Playa del Rey.

212235

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Streets For All @streetsforall.org · 07/03/2025

We’ve been hard at work in Sacramento preparing our legislative package for the year, and we’re proud to announce our 2025 bills! Here’s what we’re running this year ⬇️

46419

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Sarah Goodyear @sgoodyear.bsky.social · 03/03/2025

and some people wonder why we are mad

2262

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 16/02/2025

Update: after 4 days, SMPD finally took my report, and say they’re likely to be pressing charges and should be able to get me his identity that way. I still want to figure this out so our ordinance can be helpful when people can’t get this info through PD (that’s kind of the point of the ordinance).

0110

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 15/02/2025

Yo internet, who knows how to find the identity of a CA driver using their plate w/o paying a fortune? This guy assaulted me and, in order to take him to small court w our local ordinance, I’m supposed to provide his info, which PD won’t give me because they now have a criminal offense on him. 👌💀

4133

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Your Internet Friend Tom Tomorrow @tomtomorrow.bsky.social · 12/02/2025

well it has certainly been an amusing prank to let the worst people alive take over the american government for a few weeks, but I think it's probably gone on long enough

102105681693

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Metro Los Angeles (bot) @metrolosangelesbot.bsky.social · 08/02/2025

RIP Shoup Dogg. May your next stop be free of off-street minimums.

0141

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

M. Nolan Gray 🥑 @mnolangray.bsky.social · 08/02/2025

I'm deeply saddened to share that Donald Shoup passed away last night. He was the ideal academic—curious, methodical, and concerned with turning ideas into real-world change. TAing his parking course these past few years has one of the greatest honors of my life. Rest in peace, Shoup Dogg.

442188441

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Qagggy! @qagggy.bsky.social · 06/02/2025

One commenter wants more housing. Another wants less. Can you guess which is which?

317723

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Streets For All @streetsforall.org · 05/02/2025

The Department of City Planning has released guidelines which departments will use as the bare minimum they have to do to implement HLA We see a few issues. For example, shared bike/bus lanes are NOT acceptable in place of Class II bike lanes Learn more & take action: mailchi.mp/streetsforal...

1237

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 04/02/2025

Ride alert! Meeting at the SMC E line station for a chill loop around SM. All ages, all bikes, all abilities. And some of us might just end up at Brew Works after the ride.

030

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Alessandro Rigolon @alerigolon.bsky.social · 03/02/2025

Why are we asking our children to "share the road" with oversized vehicles? Without adequate infrastructure, the freedom of a person to drive these vehicles conflicts with the freedom of children to move around neighborhoods and cities safely.

Two children in front of a very tall pickup truck

2546498

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Streets For All @streetsforall.org · 31/01/2025

Join us Wednesday, February 12th from 5-6pm for our next happy hour! We’ll be sitting down with newly-elected Culver City Councilmember and former SFA Steering Committee Member @bubbathefish.bsky.social Bring your best transportation questions and RSVP here: us06web.zoom.us/meeting/regi...

052

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 31/01/2025

Pop up tomorrow at Douglas Park, 10am-12pm for the Santa Monica Blvd safety study. Pull up and ask for real good stuff… bus lanes… *cough cough*.

020

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Doug Gordon @brooklynspoke.bsky.social · 30/01/2025

There's also nothing wrong with "politicizing a tragedy" as politics is how we change policies to prevent tragedies.

553798

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 27/01/2025

Hey Santa Monica people, remember how we got a progressive super majority elected? Yeah, well, they’re doing good stuff, and we should let them know we support it, so they don’t just get blasted by NIMBYs 🙃

1131

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Adam Conover @adamconover.net · 24/01/2025

New monologue on YouTube: Who’s Really to Blame for the LA Fires youtu.be/QwMovDeFBw8

youtu.be

Who’s Really to Blame for the LA Fires

YouTube video by Adam Conover

1528542

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Ryan Fonseca @ryan-fonseca.bsky.social · 24/01/2025

Today marks the 100th anniversary of a L.A. traffic ordinance that reshaped public space in the city and across the U.S. I spoke with historian Peter Norton (@norton.bsky.social) about how the auto industry helped limit pedestrian access to streets, paving the fast, deadly roads we navigate today.

latimes.com

How a century-old traffic ordinance paved the way for L.A.’s deadly streets

L.A.’s pivotal 1925 traffic ordinance gave cars priority on public roads and became a nationwide template. Pedestrians are still paying a deadly price.

112343

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 17/01/2025

Since they are only allowed on truck routes here, can we also seize them when they’re on other routes? Thanks in advance.

0141

Reposted by Mobility For Who?

Brad Ewing @bradleyewing.bsky.social · 11/01/2025

Wildfire hot take: need more public education about how wildfires burn and grow. I saw many people evacuate with miles of urban buffer with no dried out vegetation out of fear that the fires would reach their home.

191

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 07/01/2025

If you’re 50+ years old and ride a bike, take this survey! If you’re not, share it with people you know. survey.alchemer.com/s3/7706636/5...

3229

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 04/01/2025

Days after a driver speeded away after killing an elderly woman in a crosswalk, SMPD shares a PSA about “shared responsibility” telling peds to “use designated crosswalks”. They can’t be serious. www.instagram.com/reel/DEVK17k...

4386

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 14/12/2024

The way passengers get dropped into car traffic because we’ve decided that cars blocking the bus stop & bike lane all day long every weekend here is fine is… very North American…

0201

Mobility For Who? @mobilityforwho.bsky.social · 11/12/2024

Santa Monica now has a very badass 6-1 council majority. It’s also losing its very awesome city manager. Pls send recs for YIMBY friendly city managers who’d be a good fit for this city 😭 Personal requirement: if they don’t use active mobility or public transit to get to work, don’t send them my way

The new Santa Monica city council in council chambers filled with a crowd there to celebrate them.

0111