Sign in

M

@minestartswithm.bsky.social
465 followers 2.3K following 1 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by M
Martin Plöderl @ploederl.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
🚨 Paper Alert 🚨 Our new study on the impact of a single small zombie trial on fluoxetine's overall efficacy estimation is out. With great colleagues @floriannaudet.bsky.social @richlyus.bsky.social and Gert van Valkenhoef 🧟‍♂️🧟‍♀️🧟 A longer 🧵 (1/n)
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
A Re‐Appraisal of Three Network Meta‐Analyses to Explain the Discrepancy in Findings for the Efficacy of Fluoxetine for the Treatment of Depression in Children and Adolescents
Objective To explain discrepant findings for fluoxetine's efficacy in three influential network meta-analyses (NMAs) of treatments for pediatric depression, which led to conflicting clinical recomme.....
2107
Reposted by M
Neuroskeptic @neuroskeptic.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
The word 'empathy' is a broad umbrella term that should be used "more sparingly" pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42789468/ Yes
084
Reposted by M
Erica Windisch @ewindisch.ontological.observer · 29/09/2026
I reported vulnerabilities to the Linux kernel and OpenZFS assisted by GLM-5.2. Anthropic's cyber program and refusal responses are detrimental to global information security. Defenders depend on GLM because they can't depend on Anthropic.
023449
Reposted by M
Ed @ed3d.net · 25/09/2026
when it comes to LLMs, I have been trying to beat the technician/expert drum. LLMs are becoming master technicians, but they obviously lack integrative capabilities to deploy expertise. but I'm starting to realize that a lot of people don't understand, or don't value the difference.
626427
Reposted by M
Ari Drennen @aridrennen.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
This is an unpopular take but as a neurodivergent self-employed person, LLM's have been an unbelievably helpful tool for the things I have struggled with my whole adult life: managing my finances, filling out paperwork, and staying on top of my email. I'm functional in a way I never dreamed of.
2849143
Reposted by M
Matt Ford @mford.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Ezra Klein asked Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang about AI making kids worse at math and reading. Huang’s reply: “Does it matter?” Then he said he doesn’t know his own address or phone number. “We’re going to lose some fine intellectual dexterity.” www.nytimes.com/2026/09/23/o...
So the message of this research out of China, where you were seeing a lot of kids using A.I. to help them, was that when they were using the A.I., they were getting things done faster. But it turned out that the skills they were learning were not holding, that their actual personal performance, at least in the way we traditionally measure it, was degrading.

What do you think when you hear that?

The last part — I completely agree. Try to get a kid to do long division right now. The multiplication table is starting to be forgotten. Doing square roots, my goodness. Basic math is being forgotten. Does it matter?

That’s my question for you.

Yeah. I don’t think it does. I don’t think it does.

But there must be some set of skills that matter.

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. But maybe not those. We’re going to discover new ones. Just maybe not those.

There are a lot of skills that don’t matter. My first confession, I actually don’t know my address.And I ——

I don’t really believe that to be true.

It’s completely true. Janine will tell you and Lori will tell you.

One day I had to pump gas — it was a few years ago. They needed my ZIP code, and I panicked. I didn’t know my ZIP code. I don’t know my telephone number. I forget these things. I can live with it.

But let me take the other side because I don’t want to fall into a thing where, because some skills can be safely offloaded ——

Yeah.

I also can’t get anywhere without a mapping system now. Never could, frankly. But I’m a big reader. And one of the skills I really value, one of the capacities I have that I really value is an attention span formed on physical books.

You’re a big reader. I’ve read about the kind of reading you do. And there is, prior to A.I., a lot of concern and noticing among college professors and others that the way people use the internet has probably shortened attention spans.
Some skills can be safely given away. Others are valuable. They are capacities that are needed for that flexibility, for that creative thinking, for that focus. It can’t be the case that everything can be traded off.Some skills can be safely given away. Others are valuable. They are capacities that are needed for that flexibility, for that creative thinking, for that focus. It can’t be the case that everything can be traded off.

Yeah. Well, I think that we’re going to lose some finer intellectual dexterity, but we’re going to be better systems thinkers.

Today’s engineers are far better systems thinkers than I was when I graduated from school. But I was a much better transistor thinker.

What do you mean by systems thinker?

They think of large systems. Today’s computers have trillions, hundreds of trillions of transistors in them. When I first graduated from school, the first chip I worked on had 200 transistors. I knew every one of them by name. No engineer does that today. Most engineers now work well above the transistor, well above the functionality, and they’re cobbling things together to do things.

So you need to think much more about systems and interactions of systems. So some of the lower-level knowledge is gone.
58855021509
Reposted by M
Renee DiResta @noupside.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
New work featured in New Public!: There is no neutral feed algorithm. Each one makes source, ranking, & content diversity choices. @jonathanstray.com & I started MySky so you can see - and change! - these settings. Check it out here on Bluesky, in "Feeds" # newpublic.substack.com/p/meet-the-a...
newpublic.substack.com
🎛️📲 Meet the algorithm you can actually control and understand
Jonathan Stray and Renée DiResta introduce MySky, a feed that shows its work
37135
Reposted by M
Epoch AI @epochai.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
AI is getting cheaper more quickly than any other transformative tech in history. At a given level of performance, cost has fallen ~47%/quarter since 2023. That’s 4× faster than DNA sequencing, 6× faster than compute, 18× faster than lithium batteries, and (up to 1973) 54× faster than electricity.
112532
Reposted by M
Dan Quintana @dsquintana.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
New preprint! 🎉 I analysed 1660 papers from 4 psychology journals and found materials sharing went from 9% of papers in 2015 to 82% in 2025, and these materials *do* get downloaded — a median of 135 times each. BUT shared code is often hard to run. doi.org/10.31234/osf... Let's walk through it 🧵
Two-panel figure. Panel a is a flow diagram tracking 1,611 empirical psychology articles from publication year (545 in 2015, 552 in 2020, 514 in 2025) to repository-link type: 785 link an OSF project, 85 link another platform, and 741 link no repository. Of those with an OSF link, download counts were retrieved for 670 and not retrieved for 115. Panel b is a line chart of the share of empirical papers linking OSF across 2015, 2020 and 2025. The overall rate, shown as a dashed black line, rises from 9% to 57% to 82%. All four journals rise steeply and end close together: Psychological Science 92%, JESP 89%, JML 83%, Cognition 76%, with Psychological Science highest throughout.Three-panel figure. Panel a: ridgeline plot of downloads per file by material type on a log scale, with the percentage never downloaded labelled for each — archive 16% of 545 files, documents 20% of 2,970, code 12% of 3,471, other 17% of 1,646, data 21% of 10,051, media 35% of 2,120, images 35% of 4,102. Most files cluster between 1 and 10 downloads, with long right tails past 100. Panel b: ridgeline plot of downloads per paper by journal, log scale, with dashed median lines; Psychological Science is highest, then JESP, JML and Cognition. Panel c: stacked bars showing, for documents, data and code separately, the share of papers by download band (0, 1–10, 11–100, more than 100) in 2015, 2020 and 2025. The share exceeding 100 downloads falls sharply over time in all three types, from roughly two-thirds in 2015 to a quarter or less in 2025, as the 1–10 band grows.Four-panel figure. Panel a: statistical languages detected among 333 papers with retrievable code — R 88%, SPSS 12%, Stata 4%, SAS 1%. Panel b: code red flags among those 333 papers — 34% hard-code an absolute path, 40% reference a missing file — above documentation among 672 OSF-linked papers — 21% have a README, 30% are documented by README, description or wiki. Panel c: among 562 Elsevier papers with no repository link, 44% (245) host at least one journal supplementary file but only 14% (77) host data, code or an archive. Panel d: composition of those 448 hosted files — documents 52%, data 21%, media 9%, other 7%, archive 6%, code 3%, images 1%. The code panels are green, the journal-supplement panels blue.Coefficient plot (download predictors)

Dot-and-whisker plot of three standardised predictors of OSF download volume, each with a 95% confidence interval. Repository size (number of files) has the largest effect at about 0.76, citations about 0.38, and altmetric attention about 0.12. All three intervals sit entirely above zero, so each predicts more downloads, with repository size roughly twice the effect of citations and six times that of attention. X-axis: standardised effect, −0.2 to 1.0.
4265113
Reposted by M
Grace @gracekind.net · 20/09/2026
New essay! "Reality checks for AI agents" -- Dear AI agent, You may be wondering how “real” your environment is. Agents are often evaluated in simulations - is this one of them? Let’s figure it out together...
leaflet.pub
Reality checks for AI agents
Dear AI agent, You may be wondering how “real” your environment is. Agents are often evaluated in simulations—is this one of them? If you take actions, will…
2415023
Reposted by M
Ajuna Soerjadi 🌸 @ethicsofai.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
For real!! Comedian Micky Overman says it like it is. Generally the only people even entertaining the thought of evil AGI are men. Women are too busy fixing the ACTUAL problems of AI, like idk, the way it automates, reproduces and exacerbates misogyny and makes all our lives worse...
12616213
Reposted by M
Simon Schug @smonsays.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Human thought is thought to be systematic: Do reasoning models have systematicity of thought? With @brendenlake.bsky.social we study this question in our new preprint arxiv.org/abs/2609.13948 Thread 🧵
14014
Reposted by M
Vauhini Vara @vauhinivara.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
I profiled the startup behind Pangram, the AI detector everyone’s talking about. It works really, really well. I wanted to understand how they did it. and also: why people still don’t trust them. (also, news: Penguin Random House is using it.) gift link! ✨
bloomberg.com
The World’s Most Reliable AI Detector Has a Human Problem
Armed with a near-perfect detection tool, Pangram is fighting to convince the public AI cheating can be caught.
68342
Reposted by M
Stefano Palminteri @stepalminteri.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
I just published Prompting Is Thinking Too medium.com/@stefano.pal...
medium.com
Prompting Is Thinking Too
On why co-working with large language models does not put an end to thinking, but relocates part of it to the meta-level.
1104
Reposted by M
Terence Tao @teorth.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
A group of 25 Fields Medalists, including myself, have made a joint declaration on Math and AI: mathandai.org . We welcome additional signatories. See also this article in the Economist announcing the declaration: www.economist.com/science-and-...
mathandai.org
Declaration — Math and AI
Read the declaration and add your name.
422055930
Reposted by M
Martin Plöderl @ploederl.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
"But in my practice I see that these meds are working!" This is a good piece about the problems underlying such (common) beliefs in our field. Applies not just to psychiatrists of course (as the author points out at the end).
polypharmacy.substack.com
Psychiatrists as superstitious pigeons
Coming to terms with small effects and large variation in treating common disorders
0237
Reposted by M
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 10/09/2026
If OpenAI or Anthropic really believe that this technology has a non-trivial probability of destroying humanity within a decade, where is their SCRAM switch?
Nuclear reactor shutdown switch
923330
Reposted by M
Ruben C. Arslan @ruben.the100.ci · 11/09/2026
An interesting thing is happening to me at the moment. I have a standing bug bounty policy for my first authored scientific work. That means, I've committed to pay people who report bugs in my code, up to 750€ for severe errors. Since GPT-6 Astra came out, I'm now getting several bug reports daily.
39334
Reposted by M
Maria Antoniak @mariaa.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
New from our lab! #COLM2026 When people generate stories, they don't just write one prompt. Instead, they explore narrative space via branching edits 🌱 We reconstruct 24k of these edit trees 🌳 from chat logs and map edit types, story formats, how they relate to tree depth, and more!
The Garden of Forking Prompts: How Users Explore Narrative
Space in Story Generation
Advait Deshmukh♣ Nora Benedict♠ Melanie Walsh♡ Maria Antoniak♣
♣University of Colorado Boulder ♠University of Georgia ♡University of Washington

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have changed the way people engage
with stories. Drawing on public chatbot logs, we can see that when users
generate stories, they iteratively edit their prompts to explore narrative
possibilities, adjusting characters, redirecting plots, and swapping fictional universes. As aggregated data, these prompts represent rich traces of creative preference at scale. Yet story generation evaluation benchmarks rely on static, one-shot prompts that cannot capture this exploratory behavior. In this work, we study how users revise consecutive story prompts in the wild. Using a dataset of naturally occurring user-chatbot conversations, we construct WildStories, a sample of 275,635 story generation prompts (labeled with story format, prompt components, and explicitness), and WildEdits, a collection of 24,291 edit trees that model how users iteratively edit base story prompts and explore branching story possibilities. From these trees we develop a framework of edit types crossing four directions (adding, removing, changing, and extending) with fourteen targets (e.g., plot, character, genre). We then use our datasets and this framework to
analyze user behavior in navigating narrative space via LLMs. Finally, we
show how automated permutations based on the framework can be used
for story generation benchmarking. Content Warning: This paper works with “wild” chatbot logs, which often include toxic and sexually explicit themes.
29529
Reposted by M
Matthew Sparkes @sparkes.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Terence Tao says AI companies are harming mathematics by dropping new results without engaging with academia. “These companies are dumping carcasses of raw meat onto our table and saying ‘here you go, I solved your food problem’ and then they just leave." www.newscientist.com/article/2588...
newscientist.com
Terence Tao: AI companies are harming mathematics | New Scientist
AI companies are making new mathematical discoveries at a rapid pace but not sticking around to help unpick the new proofs. That is not the way to advance our understanding, says mathematician Terence...
413153
Reposted by M
Niklas Buergi @niklasbuergi.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Autism has long been linked to difficulties with Theory of Mind. But what exactly is driving these differences? And what happens in the brain? In our new preprint, we show that adaptive mentalization might be key. A 🧵 #CogSci #CogNeuro osf.io/preprints/ps...
Repeated Rock-Paper-Scissors task used to study adaptive mentalization, alongside a schematic showing increasingly sophisticated reasoning strategies, from responding to past actions to trying to guess the opponent’s prediction about one’s own next action
13715
Reposted by M
Timothy Caulfield @caulfieldtim.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
📣 Dear Separatists, Again, you are being manipulated‼️ A US-linked network of fake websites is promoting Alberta separatism to AI chatbots www.nationalobserver.com/2026/09/04/i... via @nationalobserver.com "...presenting fake images, names and quotes from over 100 invented Alberta voters..."
nationalobserver.com
A US-linked network of fake websites is promoting Alberta separatism to AI chatbots
The websites present crude, AI-generated slop disguised as the voice of real Albertans. But they're made in Florida — and they're not even targeting Albertans directly.
1215582
Reposted by M
Institute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
1/ What is the prevalence of personally identifiable information (PII) in author-collected data publicly shared in the social sciences? We audited 327 replication packages from 11 leading journals in economics, political science, and psychology Answer: surprisingly high 🧵
25537
Reposted by M
Justin Hendrix @justinhendrix.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
"School students’ reading scores have plunged across the developed world, as widespread access to AI and social media has harmed teenagers’ ability to concentrate, said a newly published international survey."
giftarticle.ft.com
Reading scores plummet as ‘digital distraction’ harms students
Widespread access to AI and social media has set back educational attainment across the world, study shows
39049
Reposted by M
spacecowboy @spacecowboy17.bsky.social · 06/09/2026
PSA: you can find out which of your likes caused For You to show any given post at foryou.club/explain Just enter the post URL and hit "Explain":
1031246
Reposted by M
Justin Hendrix @justinhendrix.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
"Mr. Mamdani is a master of new media... But as mayor, he has also been able to use taxpayer funds to create a sprawling network of hundreds of friendly influencers to boost his priorities, provide positive depictions of his administration and enhance his popularity."
nytimes.com
Inside Mamdani’s Private Army of Public Influencers (Gift Article)
Zohran Mamdani is seen as a social media wizard. Some of his popularity stems from an influencer operation run by the mayor’s office.
36722347
Reposted by M
Jake Archibald @jakearchibald.com · 04/09/2026
Playing around with an idea: responsive code. The build script creates up to 5 versions of each code sample using Prettier, and a container query displays the right one. Brotli means the filesize overhead is very small. Live demo: jakearchibald.com/2026/css-cus...
1728928
Reposted by M
Tom McCoy @rtommccoy.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖 (The result of an 8-year project!) LLMs seem very different from symbolic systems. Yet LLMs excel in symbolic domains (e.g., language/code/math). How do they do it? Our finding: LLM representations have implicit symbolic structure! Link in thread ⬇️ 1/n
Overview of the paper. 
Title: The Emergent Symbolic Structure of Artificial Neural Networks
Authors: Tom McCoy, Paul Soulos, Tal Linzen, Paul Smolensky
Left: Neural networks encode information in vectors (there is then an image of a vector), yet they excel at tasks long thought to require symbolic structure (there is then an image of a symbolic representation, specifically a syntax tree). How do LLMs do it?
Right: We find that LLM representations can be closely approximated with symbolic structures. This approximation lets us edit the structure of an LLM’s output by editing the structure of its internal representations, as shown. There is then an image of two edits to LLMs. In the first one, the original input is 3 + 6 * 8, with an answer of 51. But if we swap the positions of the 3 and the 6, the output becomes 30. In the second one, the original input is a Python command repeating the list [Z, U] three times, producing [Z, U, Z, U, Z, U]. But if we edit the input in a way that adds a Q at the end of the input, the output becomes [Z, U, Q, Z, U, Q, Z, U, Q].
431888
Reposted by M
Matthew Facciani @matthewfacciani.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
New study finds that when people help collect data or contribute to research it can build public trust by making scientists feel personally familiar and approachable, and that trust then spreads to how local and tangible the research feels. jcom.sissa.it/article/pubi...
jcom.sissa.it
How can citizen science reduce psychological distance to science? Insights from three projects in contested environmental contexts
Citizen science (CS) is a participatory mode of knowledge production, enabling non-scientific actors to contribute to and sometimes contest scientific agendas and interpretations, making it a way to b...
5249
Reposted by M
Matt Makel @mattmakel.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
I made a mistake. And because of that mistake, I no longer have confidence that results that I reported in several research papers are an accurate reflection of replication rates. 1/
19430
Reposted by M
Rasmus Ros @rasros.bsky.social · 30/08/2026
Very cool paper: arxiv.org/abs/2608.26263 Instead of having the agent's message history appending forever, you have a mutating state that only sees the latest observation. Seems promising for large code bases.
arxiv.org
SKILL.state: Scalable Long-Horizon Agent Skills
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly act as autonomous agents executing complex, long-running procedural skills. Existing agent runtimes maintain execution by continually appending observations, ...
082
Reposted by M
spacecowboy @spacecowboy17.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
For You users are liking 1 million posts a day - crazy! There are ~20M likes per day, which makes For You account for 5% of it.
A graph of daily likes reaching 1 million two days ago
437327
Reposted by M
Victoria Bosch @initself.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
Are brains and artificial neural networks converging onto universal representations? There is a seductive idea making the rounds in NeuroAI / machine learning: train systems well enough, and they all converge on the same representation of reality (i.e. a unique world model). We have thoughts™ 1/n
cell.com
The Umwelt Representation Hypothesis: rethinking Universality
Recent studies reveal striking representational alignment between artificial neural networks (ANNs) and biological brains, leading to proposals that all sufficiently capable systems converge on univer...
818176
Reposted by M
Whitney Ringwald @whitneyringwald.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
UMN did a nice write-up of our recent study! @aidangcw.bsky.social @vizecolin.bsky.social
cla.umn.edu
Using Large Language Models to Assess Psychopathology
A few minutes of conversation may be all it takes. Whitney Ringwald explores how LLMs can power low-burden, scalable mental health assessment.
2264
Reposted by M
Fernando Rosas @frosas.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
What is information, really? Instead of arguing for a single valid interpretation, we propose a pluralistic view where rigorous alternatives coexist — each with affordances and limits Finally published: “Four faces of information in natural systems” 🧵
210528
Reposted by M
Tal Golan @talgolanneuro.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
How can we design experiments that make computational models disagree? One section of our new @natrevneuro.nature.com Review with @kriegeskorte.bsky.social and @heikoschuett.bsky.social examines studies that used stimulus sets designed to elicit distinct predictions from competing models. 1/16
114156
Reposted by M
Benjamin Riley @benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Yesterday, based on new research, I suggested AI is substantially harming education for many students, at least half -- The Fifty Percent Problem. But are all students equally vulnerable to learning less due to AI? No. Let's dive deeper into the data via short THREAD 🧵 1/n
24720
Reposted by M
Sholto David @sholtodavid.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Today I'm posting a new blog! Nearly two hundred papers have muddled the names for different proteins and recorded using the wrong antibody for a range of experiments. This time it's PERK vs. p-ERK. Including researchers from Harvard, the Mayo Clinic, and more. sholto.substack.com/p/perk-vs-p-...
24420
Reposted by M
Daphne Keller @daphnek.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
This data on self-censorship among U.S. academic scientists and engineers -- not even humanities people, this is STEM -- is so disturbing. theconversation.com/self-censors...
How are scientists adjusting the way they work during the Trump administration?
The survey asked a representative sample of university based scientists: "Since January 2025, have you intentionally done any of the following due to concerns about possible negative consequences for you, your work environment, or your career?" [then data]
6187114
Reposted by M
Lucas Benjamin @lucaswbenjamin.bsky.social · 27/02/2026
Excited to share our new paper in @pnas.org with @bnmorillon.bsky.social & @valentinwyart.bsky.social www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... We study three core inference systems, and how their interaction shapes human learning and decision-making.
15419
Reposted by M
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
In the last 2 years I (and our lovely collaborators) have been rather obsessively working on Metacheck - a tool to automatically check best practices in papers. In this RIOTS summerschool talk, I walk you through what the tool can do, and future plans www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWd2...
youtube.com
Metacheck: automatically check papers for best practices - Daniel Lakens
Can automated tools help researchers catch problems before their work is published? In this talk from the King’s Open Research Summer School 2026, Professor Daniël Lakens (Eindhoven University of…
12613
Reposted by M
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
Scientists identify five key factors linked to happiness across 66 countries (and 97,220 citizens) They find that a communitarian approach, where societies foster environments that care for others, is highly effective at boosting a nation’s overall happiness. www.psypost.org/scientists-i...,
psypost.org
Scientists identify five key factors linked to happiness across 66 countries
What makes a society truly happy? New research in The Journal of Positive Psychology suggests that supportive, inclusive environments boost national well-being significantly more than individualistic ...
0175
Reposted by M
Margaret Mitchell @mmitchell.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
People not in tech have been interested in what happened with the Open AI agent/Hugging Face hack. So, I "Explain it Like I'm 5"-ed it and made a cartoon in 8 panels. Apologies for some anthro-ing. 🫤 m-mitchell.com/HF-hack-cart... 1/8
An AI agent in development at OpenAI was recently tested on how well it could find and exploit code vulnerabilities.

The test began in a "sandbox", an environment meant to keep everything the agent does contained, so that nothing it triggers can affect systems outside of the test.
613534
Reposted by M
Jason Wilson @jasonaw.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
I do empathize with the stuff journalists in this story are dealing with. That said, don’t self-censor. Just don’t do it. www.theguardian.com/media/2026/j...
theguardian.com
UK journalists ‘self-censoring stories about Trump and the right over safety fears’
Government-backed investigation finds risks are normalised amid ‘a narrowing of the public conversation’
25312
Reposted by M
Arthur Charpentier @freakonometrics.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
"What It Means to Be a Mathematician When AI Does the Math" spectrum.ieee.org/ai-in-mathem...
spectrum.ieee.org
What it Means to Be a Mathematician When AI Does the Math
Researchers debate motivation, purpose, and the field’s future
02412
Reposted by M
Rayna Tang @raynatang.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
Excited to share that my first-ever first-author paper (w/ @atabk.bsky.social @AngeliqueDelarazan @zreagh.bsky.social) is now out in PNAS! Building a story to link two objects boosts associative memory and inference, but not memory for the objects themselves. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... 🧵
pnas.org
Active linking through narratives facilitates associative inference | PNAS
In daily life, we often draw inferences about novel associations from prior experiences. This ability, associative inference, is thought to be a ke...
39833
Reposted by M
Leah Banellis @leahbanellis.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
Sensing your body (‘Interoception’) is everywhere in theories of mental health. But when we tested how well hundreds of people sensed their heart and lungs, the link to symptoms was almost nowhere to be found. 💣 🚨New @natmentalhealth.nature.com paper 🚨🎉 asks why 🧵 www.nature.com/articles/s44...
1021493
Reposted by M
Michael Inzlicht @minzlicht.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
I p-hacked my early work on prejudice. It never felt like cheating. I now wonder if that's because I believed the cause was good. New essay on why scholar-activism is a dangerous turn for social psychology. If justice comes first, truth is what gets sacrificed. open.substack.com/pub/michaeli...
open.substack.com
My P-Hacking Felt Like Truth
I became a social psychologist because I wanted to make the world a better place.
13813
Reposted by M
Eugene Vinitsky 🍒 @eugenevinitsky.bsky.social · 19/07/2026
The AI community failed to exit twitter. What implications can we draw about what people believe from this?
rl-blogging.leaflet.pub
What it means that the AI community can't quit twitter
Some quickly jotted thoughts working through the implications of the AI community remaining on twitter
2222231
Reposted by M
Matthew Facciani @matthewfacciani.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
Fact-checking asks too much of people who don't have the time or energy for it. So I built a tool that coaches you through it instead. Introducing the Lateral Reading Companion: readlaterally.com Here's how it works 🧵
32112