Sign in

Katie Corker

@katiecorker.bsky.social
1.9K followers 774 following 1.7K posts

Executive Director ASAPbio, promoter/enthusiast of all things open science

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Katie Corker
Björn Brembs @brembs.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 02/10/2026
Mark you calendars: #zurich Wednesday, October 21, 3.30pm, keynote presentation: "Replacing Academic Journals" Open Access Week | Lib4RI www.lib4ri.ch/open-access-week #openaccess #openscience
lib4ri.ch
Open Access Week | Lib4RI
035
Reposted by Katie Corker
Astronomer Royal for Scotland | Catherine Heymans @astroroyalscot.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
Let me recommend grabbing a cup of tea & reading this really thoughtful piece from the inimitable @hogg.bsky.social on moderating AI/LLM use in astrophysics. 🔭 "the real question we face is not ... how we do astrophysics. It is the question of why we do astrophysics." 📖: arxiv.org/pdf/2602.10181
A screenshot of text from a paper that reads:

One idea or rule of thumb is perhaps that we should or could interact with an LLM only in the same ways that we would interact with a non-coauthor colleague. You might ask your colleague for help finding something in the literature, but you wouldn’t ask your non-coauthor colleague to write the introduction of the paper you are writing. You might ask your colleague to help speed up your code, but you wouldn’t
ask your colleague to write your code. Another idea is that, given our respect for our readers, we shouldn’t ask them to engage with something that took way less time to write than to read. I like these ideas; maybe they could evolve into conventions or community-supported best practices.
46423
Reposted by Katie Corker
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Undoubtedly people will dislike arXiv's rate limits, but the real question is what is the alternative? The $$$ cost and noise>>>signal that the influx of slop and low-quality meh papers creates mean doing nothing is not an option.
2112
Reposted by Katie Corker
International Science Council (ISC) @sciencecouncil.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
#CallForEndorsement: The ISC is calling on Members to endorse the Right to Participate in and Benefit from Science to strengthen the collective voice of the scientific community. council.science/news/science-human-…
032
Reposted by Katie Corker
moin syed @syeducation.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Gave a talk in my dept. on the OSF transition. I wrote up a rough script of the session, which could be of interest to others. I synthesize existing resources and provide my own perspectives. Comments and corrections welcome! zenodo.org/records/2306...
the header for a paper describing "Life after OSF" #metascience
215172
Reposted by Katie Corker
Jacob Aron @jjaron.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
arXiv limits people to 2 submissions a month, to hold back the tide of AI papers. Feels entirely sensible - today I happened to notice one person had submitted 3 papers, all AI-assisted, in September. Totally out of step with academic norms and simply not sustainable blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...
blog.arxiv.org
Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy
arXiv, and the scientific community at large, are facing a watershed moment. Scholarly publishing is currently changing at a rapid pace, and we are seeing a…
14717
Reposted by Katie Corker
Institute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Over the past two years, I4R partnered with Psychological Science (@psychscience.bsky.social) on a large reproducibility project. 67 independent teams reproduced 64 articles published in 2024–2025, about 44% of eligible papers. Paper: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10... Here's what we learned 🧵
18959
Reposted by Katie Corker
COMET @cometadata.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Running a metadata enrichment project in the open? COMET pilot teams refined a Project Doc Template to record objectives, collaborators, outputs and lessons learnt, so others can trust and reuse the work. Try it and tell us what you'd change. #ScholarlyMetadata #OpenResearchInformation
cometadata.org
An Open Approach to Documenting Community Metadata Enrichment Projects - COMET Richer Metadata. Together.
This post outlines an open approach to documenting community-led metadata enrichment projects, providing examples from COMET’s pilot projects and template …
01211
Reposted by Katie Corker
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Noise/useless science rather than AI slop is a current challenge: "If medical schools and universities don't want the literature to be overwhelmed with garbage, they should stop giving every applicant ... an incentive to publish a lot of crap." www.medpagetoday.com/special-repo...
medpagetoday.com
Is AI Flooding Medical Journals With 'Meaningless' Research?
'It's not fraudulent, and it's not really slop,' one expert says
49126
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
"Twenty-nine years later, the central finding still held. The 1990s biochemistry had stood the test of time. That is impactful science. That’s world class science. It’s not more complicated than that. Not the journal. Not the press release. Not the citations in year one."
073
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
What "self-correction" looks like in action. We need more Pauls, and tooling that supports them.
075
Reposted by Katie Corker
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The strain on peer review is due to our obsession of submitting *everything* to a journal and requiring PRE-PUBLICATION peer review of it before it's deemed "mature science." The problem with peer review is that no one can accept we have to stop pre-publication reviewing as default. 2/n
253
Reposted by Katie Corker
Josh de Leeuw @joshdeleeuw.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
DataPipe (pipe.jspsych.org) is ready for its post-OSF life. You can use it as before to save data from online experiments, but now the data can be sent to Zenodo, Google Drive, or a Dataverse instance. Existing OSF connections work until 11/16 I took this opportunity to do some major updates...
pipe.jspsych.org
DataPipe
13217
Reposted by Katie Corker
Juan Pablo Alperin @juancommander.scholcommlab.ca · 16/09/2026
TWO new BLOGS on the the messy landscape of preprints. First, mapping out preprint servers and services seems easy... but it's not! What counts as a #preprint server? read our take w/ @mariomalicki.bsky.social and @nataschachtena.bsky.social www.scholcommlab.ca/2026/09/01/d...
scholcommlab.ca
Defining Preprints and Preprint Servers: Mapping an Inconsistent Landscape
A term without a settled definition The term “preprint” is widely used in scholarly communication, but it does not have an agreed-upon definition across disciplines, platforms, or professional role…
164
Reposted by Katie Corker
SORTEE @sortee.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Interested in helping make science a better place? Nominations for 2027 #SORTEE volunteer positions are open now! With 10 committees to choose from and so many ways to get involved, we welcome everyone to volunteer with us! Nominations close 31st Oct. sortee.org/join/ #openscience
01319
Reposted by Katie Corker
Gautam Kamath @gautamkamath.com · 16/09/2026
Nihar Shah did a heroic experiment for TMLR: he spent 20-25 hours over two weeks interviewing authors of seemingly low-quality submissions about their own papers. He confirmed what we all suspected: people submitting these papers have *no idea* what is going on in them.
5293117
Reposted by Katie Corker
Bianca Kramer @msphelps.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Excellente nouvelle et signal important ‼️ At the @oecd-ocde.bsky.social Blue Skies forum on STI Data & Indicators, the minister of Higher Education & Research presented the new French Open Science strategy: www.ouvrirlascience.fr/french-open-… @ouvrirlascience.bsky.social
011
Reposted by Katie Corker
Peer Community In @peercommunityin.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
A new article is out in the free, generalist, open-access Peer Community Journal! Free public peer reviews and recommendation by PCI Nutrition: doi.org/10.24072/pci... 📣 You want to publish in PCJ? Submit your preprint to one of the 21 thematic PCI 👉 peercommunityin.org/submit-a-pre...
peercommunityjournal.org
Co-creation of nutrition interventions in higher education settings: proposals from a student citizens’ assembly
el Karmouni, Hajar1 ; Dehove, Henri2 ; Allès, Benjamin2 ; Baudry, Julia2; Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle2 ; Péneau, Sandrine2 ; Touvier, Mathilde2 ; Mofakhami, Malo3 ; Group, USPN Student Citizens’…
031
Reposted by Katie Corker
DORA @dorassessment.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Our new paper, with @asapbio.bsky.social, @cwts.nl and @sciencecouncil.bsky.social, argues for coordinated action across assessment and publishing reform 👉 bit.ly/RRA-publishing The conversation continues at our @oaspa.bsky.social side event, helping shape the upcoming Practical Guide for Schol Comm
bit.ly
From interdependent movements to shared action: Connecting publishing and assessment reforms
Research assessment and scholarly publishing play interconnected roles in shaping research culture, incentives, and norms that ultimately determine what knowledge is produced, communicated, trusted, a...
066
Reposted by Katie Corker
Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) @improvingpsych.org · 14/09/2026
Looking for a home for your new psychology preprint? PsyArXiv is the best place for psychologists to post preprints! PsyArXiv is a preprint server run and maintained by SIPS volunteers and hosted on the OSF platform. Don't search any further; visit buff.ly/k7t14KM and share your research!
0113
Reposted by Katie Corker
Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) Alliance @prcalliance.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
The researchers adopting the Publish, Review, Curate model understand the importance of peer review. During this #PeerReviewWeek, we celebrate reviewers and the work they do. Let’s give them the credit they deserve by making the review process transparent and reviews publicly available!
055
Reposted by Katie Corker
Ruben C. Arslan @ruben.the100.ci · 11/09/2026
An interesting thing is happening to me at the moment. I have a standing bug bounty policy for my first authored scientific work. That means, I've committed to pay people who report bugs in my code, up to 750€ for severe errors. Since GPT-6 Astra came out, I'm now getting several bug reports daily.
39334
Reposted by Katie Corker
Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Ever since this happened, I have never given journals sole ownerhip of my supplemental materials .. eiko-fried.com/blog/supplem...
eiko-fried.com
Supplementary materials fail | Eiko Fried
A few months ago, we published a new paper Fried, E. I., van Borkulo, C. D., Cramer, A. O. J., Boschloo, L., Schoevers, R. A., & Borsboom, D. (2017). Mental disorders as networks...
64916
Reposted by Katie Corker
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Journals should stop offering to store supplemental information. Everything that is shared with a paper should have it's own DOI, and live in a proper repository. As authors, link to files (e.g., Zenodo), but never add them as supplemental files.
5469
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Looking forward to the public launch of the PRC Alliance - hope you can join us!
063
Reposted by Katie Corker
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
You can now update bioRxiv/medRxiv preprints with funding information after the fact. Authors often omit/don't have all funding info when submitting, but funders understandably want it there. This solves the problem without requiring you to submit a whole new paper. openrxiv.org/updating-fun...
openrxiv.org
Updating funder information on preprints - openRxiv
For the past year, bioRxiv and medRxiv authors have been able to include funder information with their preprints. This can be entered in a dedicated field during the submission process, using Research...
06428
Reposted by Katie Corker
Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) @improvingpsych.org · 03/09/2026
Preregistrations are increasingly common, but getting them right isn’t always straightforward. Join us for the Preregistration F*ck Up Night at #DGPs2026 on Sep 6, at 7PM in Luxembourg! An initial round of drinks is kindly sponsored by @improvingpsych.org. 🔗 Register here: buff.ly/pmvpkjf
0176
Reposted by Katie Corker
petersuber @petersuber.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy · 01/09/2026
This is the last month of activity for the Open Access Tracking Project (#OATP, @oatp). September 30, 2026, will be the last day of tagging and updates. The Harvard instance of #TagTeam -- the #OpenSource tagging platform on which OATP ran -- will start winding down soon after. But the code […]
fediscience.org
Original post on fediscience.org
055
Reposted by Katie Corker
Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) Alliance @prcalliance.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Can you imagine a world where publishing is not a secretive black box, but a transparent process? This is one of the PRC Alliance's goals! Follow us on this journey! Learn more 👉 publish-review-curate.org/benefits-of-...
075
Reposted by Katie Corker
Lisa DeBruine @debruine.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
We’re so close to a solution! Most unis have an institutional repository. If outputs were always published on the lead author’s repo, learned societies reviewed and curated them, their overlay journals just pointed at them, and everything had a DOI, what would we need commercial publishers for?
4245
Reposted by Katie Corker
ASAPbio @asapbio.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
ASAPbio is excited to co-lead this initiative with @coar-repositories.bsky.social We recommend following the page to learn more about Publish-Review-Curate model of scholarly publishing and the PRC Alliance!
055
Reposted by Katie Corker
The Metascience Observatory @metascienceobs.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
AI for metascience data extraction, AI for peer review, AI for forensic auditing, AI for rigor-checking, AI for sleuthing, AI for replication, AI for lit review..... today's AI is making so much possible now! Apply to attend this online conference for free here: forrt.org/ai-metascien...
forrt.org
FORRT AI in Metascience Online Conference | FORRT
Register for the FORRT AI in Metascience Online Conference, 28–30 September 2026. Online and free to attend.
023
Reposted by Katie Corker
Kathleen Fitzpatrick @kfitz.info · 26/08/2026
The @kcommons.bsky.social team is very excited to be working with the @prcalliance.bsky.social to rethink scholarly communication from the ground up. Very much looking forward to more!
272
Reposted by Katie Corker
Mike Thicke @mikethicke.bsky.social · 26/08/2026
I saw from @kfitz.info today that @kcommons.bsky.social is working with PRC. I think this is a great direction and I'm looking forward to seeing what my former colleagues there will produce.
publish-review-curate.org
What is PRC?
The Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) model re-imagines scholarly publishing by breaking the traditional publishing process into three distinct, independently executable stages: publish, review, and cu…
042
Reposted by Katie Corker
Robert (Bob) Kubinec @rmkubinec.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
My ordered beta regression paper has now reached over 5k downloads on OSF: osf.io/preprints/so... I'd like to thank all of the readers 🫶 and also academic publishing companies by making it so darn hard to access the published version. As an FYI, the OSF version is *exactly* the same.
osf.io
OSF
3364
Reposted by Katie Corker
Amanda Kay Montoya @akmontoya.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Just a reminder that posting code/materials on your personal website is not a long term solution and not compliant with most sharing standards. I've run into two papers today from the same lab that uses this practice, all the links are broken. Will wait for replies to emails I guess....
2245
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Follow to learn more about PRC and the PRC Alliance!
121
Reposted by Katie Corker
SORTEE @sortee.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
🌟 Final month to nominate projects for the 2026 SORTEE Commendation Awards! Know a project promoting Open Science in ecology & evolution, such as workshops, tools, repositories, outreach & more? Projects can be local or global, team-based or individual. sortee.org/awards/
01118
Reposted by Katie Corker
PREreview @prereview.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
Community support for more rapid & transparent scholarly communication models is growing. But as @jpflores.rbind.io argues, research assessment needs to recognize and reward this shift. The PRC Alliance aims to raise the visibility and status of this model. Learn more & join: bit.ly/3U467YV
bit.ly
Join the Alliance
Membership in the Alliance is open to organisations and initiatives working together to share knowledge and accelerate the adoption of the Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) model of scholarly publishin…
033
Reposted by Katie Corker
jp flores (he/him) @jpflores.rbind.io · 19/08/2026
7/7 If we want scientists to stop chasing journal prestige, we have to stop rewarding them for chasing journal prestige. Change the incentives, and the culture can follow. @hannaherf.bsky.social and I make the case in @sciencepolitics.bsky.social: sciencepolitics.org/2026/08/17/s...
sciencepolitics.org
Science Doesn't Need Better Journals. It Needs Better Incentives. - Science Politics
Journal prestige shapes what science gets done, how fast it moves, and whose work gets seen. Pushing institutions to engage in open science can make the system more equitable.
21710
Reposted by Katie Corker
David Mellor @davidmellor.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
Please apply and share with those who you think would make great contributions. Methodology experts and those who want to advance open science policies are welcome!
022
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
Just for the record, I absolutely want to see what all of you are crafting. Gorgeous work here!
010
Reposted by Katie Corker
Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) @improvingpsych.org · 15/08/2026
🥳Today, PsyArXiv – the community preprint server for psychology – turns 10! 🥳 Thank you to everyone who contributed to the server's growth, including volunteers who work behind the scenes to keep it running, preprint authors, and readers!
06917
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
That last point 👀
030
Reposted by Katie Corker
Hayward Godwin @haywardgodwin.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
But wait there’s more! With projects freezing, we can also talk about metadata. Many people have already spoken about how limited metadata can mean that the shared outputs are hard to understand and reuse. But there’s a specific other issue regarding limited metadata.
111
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
For those looking for alternatives to OSF, I recommend two resources comparing features of other Generalist Repositories. Resources are from GREI, an NIH funded initiative. Comparison tool to help you pick which one you like best: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Decision tree:  doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
doi.org
Generalist Repository Comparison Chart
The Generalist Repository Comparison Chart and FAIRsharing Collection (https://fairsharing.org/collection/GeneralRepositoryComparison) was originally an outcome of the NIH Workshop on the Role of Gene...
03523
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Have not tested, so can't speak to functionality - but could solve a problem that many people have.
120
Reposted by Katie Corker
Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Many of us are now learning that research infrastructure is not persistent. Here is a checklist of what I consider when choosing a service. This applies to data repositories, preprint servers, but also to academic journals or research software.
A graphic titled "Service Choice Checklist" with the subtitle "What should I consider before using a service for research infrastructure?"

The graphic lists five checklist items:

Non-commercial: If it is for-profit and free, then you are the product (see stoptrackingscience)

Open source & Licenses: It may allow others to review the code, make it interoperable, or to host the service

Disciplinary scope: Some or for all disciplines and some cover specific fields

Affiliation requirements: Institutional repositories require you to be affiliated with the institution

Long-term commitment: Has the provider committed to providing the service for the next years? How is it funded?
1127
Reposted by Katie Corker
Dermot Lynott @dermotlynott.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
For reassurance, the changes to OSF have no impact on PsyArXiv (and other preprint communities hosted by the Center for Open Science), which will continue to operate as normal blog.psyarxiv.com/2026/08/11/w...
blog.psyarxiv.com
What Researchers Need to Know about PsyArXiv Given Upcoming Changes to OSF Projects – PsyArXiv Blog
In just a few short days (August 15th, 2026), PsyArXiv – the community preprint server for psychology – turns 10! 🥳 Over the past decade, our community has published over 58,000 preprints, allowing re...
03117
Reposted by Katie Corker
Mark Ziemann 🇺🇦🌻🦩 @mdziemann.genomic.social.ap.brid.gy · 07/08/2026
We started a Reproducibility Network for Computational Biology! 🎉 🥳 🍾 Improving research quality is the main aim. There will be opportunities to get involved later in the year as a general member or position on the committee. More details here […] [Original post on genomic.social]
Screenshot showing the members of the steering committee of the Reproducibility Network for Computational Biology. There are 12 prominent researchers across 7 countries.
0114