Sign in

Jochem van Noord

@jochemvannoord.eu
399 followers 882 following 16 posts

jochemvannoord.eu

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Leandros Kavadias @lkavadia.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
❗New paper in @ejprjournal.bsky.social! With @jochemvannoord.eu, @bramspruyt.bsky.social and @tkupp.bsky.social, we investigate the education effect on political trust from a global perspective – and how this depends on the schooled society and sector of employment. doi.org/10.1017/S147...
0153
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
European Journal of Political Research @ejprjournal.bsky.social · 13/03/2026
🆕 When does education increase political trust? 🎓🏛️ @lkavadia.bsky.social, @jochemvannoord.eu, @bramspruyt.bsky.social & @tkupp.bsky.social use a wide range of data to show the “education effect” on #PoliticalTrust depends on how strongly societies are organised around schooling
buff.ly
The state and its schooled elite across 84 countries: Educational differences in political trust depend on the schooled society and sector of employment | European Journal of Political Research | Cambridge Core
The state and its schooled elite across 84 countries: Educational differences in political trust depend on the schooled society and sector of employment
0137
Jochem van Noord @jochemvannoord.eu · 29/01/2026
Ik vind nog steeds dat iedereen die zich mengt in de discussie over onderwijsconflict eerst eens dit artikel moet lezen - niemand heeft het over legitimiteit v onderwijs en het effect daarvan... link.springer.com/article/10.1... "Onder sociologen woekert de strijd over diploma’s nog voort"
nrc.nl
Onder sociologen woekert de strijd over diploma’s nog voort
Sociologie: Loopt er een scheidslijn tussen hoog- en laagopgeleid Nederland? Sociologen zijn er nog niet over uit. „Bij de cruciale thema’s van deze tijd – migratie, klimaat – zie je dat ze er heel an...
100
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Karel Smouter @kcsmouter.bsky.social · 04/01/2026
De reacties op de onrechtmatige ontvoering van Maduro leggen bloot wie bereid is de internationale orde te verdedigen, en wie haar uit angst, gemakzucht of opportunisme laat vallen. Commentaar in @ktrouw.bsky.social : www.trouw.nl/opinie/wie-v...
trouw.nl
Wie vandaag zwijgt over Venezuela, kan straks moeilijk verontwaardigd zijn over Groenland
96732
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Frans van Heest @fransvanheest.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
Dit was twee jaar terug de uitslag van de briefstemmen buiten Nederland, die als ik mijn research goed gedaan heb pas altijd, de dag na de verkiezingen dus vandaag op donderdag worden geteld. Dan moet D66 dat verschil van nu 1382 stemmen op de PVV makkelijk kunnen inlopen.
051
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Tom van der Meer @tomwgvdmeer.bsky.social · 25/10/2025
Ook de laatste dagen van deze verkiezingscampagne is het belangrijk dat redacties en duiders - zeker ook die van talkshows, podcasts, of internetpagina's - peilingen op een juiste manier gebruiken. stukroodvlees.nl/peilingen-du... Dus niet cherrypicken: één bron is geen bron.
stukroodvlees.nl
Peilingen duiden: 10 essentiële vuistregels voor duiders - StukRoodVlees
Zetelpeilingen worden vaak misbruikt. Een tiental vuistregels om je publiek niet voor te liegen met non-nieuws.
02812
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Tom van der Meer @tomwgvdmeer.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
De mythe die niet sterft Ook vandaag herhaalt Vullings dat de PvdA toch écht kiezers verloor aan de PVV. Nadat Marleen de Rooy de uitspraak van Yesilgöz terecht weerlegde (over de PvdA die veel kiezers zou hebben verloren aan de PVV), stelt Vullings dat die overloop langer geleden was dan in 2023.
30285115
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Toon Kuppens @tkupp.bsky.social · 13/06/2025
Only 10 days left to apply for this phd position on education-based identities, status, and political attitudes! Open to those interested in sociology, social psychology, political science, communication science or indeed a combination of all. jobs.vub.be/job/Elsene-P...
jobs.vub.be
PhD Researcher - Scientific project on Education-based social identities
PhD Researcher - Scientific project on Education-based social identities
01418
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Nils Steiner @nilssteiner.bsky.social · 09/06/2025
If you are at the @ecpr-ead.bsky.social conference, come to @liranharsgor.bsky.social's panel on Tuesday 15:00 - 16:30 and hear Armin's talk. We document a growing gap in satisfaction with democracy between the lower and the higher educated using APC- analyses of Eurobarometer and ESS data.
0225
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
de Volkskrant @volkskrant.nl · 04/06/2025
Laten we er de allersaaiste verkiezingscampagne ooit van proberen te maken
volkskrant.nl
Laten we er de allersaaiste verkiezingscampagne ooit van proberen te maken
5306
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
John Bijl @johnbijl.bsky.social · 04/06/2025
Polarisatie en wantrouwen in politiek wordt gevoed door juist dit soort sneren als nieuws te pushen. Nieuwsmedia zoals @nu.nl zouden beter moeten weten.
1278
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Willem de Koster @willemdekoster.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
📢 We're hiring a 4-year postdoc (0.8 FTE) at Erasmus Univ. Rotterdam for project on climate change meanings Focus: Italian case (focus groups, survey, experiments) PhD in Sociology (or related), fluent in Italian 🗓️ Deadline: June 11 #postdoc #sociology #academicjobs #Italy #climatechange
academictransfer.com
Postdoctoral researcher Sociology; Understanding climate change attitudes
What does climate change mean to people—and why? And how do these meanings shape public responses to policy and information campaigns?
0913
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Danbischof @danbischof.bsky.social · 16/05/2025
🚨 working paper (w. @morganlcj.bsky.social @markuswagner.bsky.social): Protesters are not judged equally - even if tactics of groups are similar. We ran an experiment in 🇩🇪 testing how people react to farmers vs. climate activists blocking roads. What we find is disturbing: osf.io/preprints/os...
10357145
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Frans Timmermans @franstimmermans.groenlinkspvda.nl · 18/05/2025
De rode lijn is ver overschreden. Terwijl het kabinet Wilders-Yeşilgöz wegkijkt terwijl de regering van Netanyahu zich schuldig maakt aan oorlogsmisdaden, gaan Nederlanders de straat op met een heldere boodschap: kabinet, spreek je uit en voer de druk op! 1/3
27903139
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World @sociusjournal.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
🏫 How central is schooling in your country? In their new #Socius study, Drs. Kavadias, @bramspruyt.bsky.social & @tkupp.bsky.social introduce the Schooled Society Index—a global measure of how #education acts as a force of #institutionalization and #stratification. Read: doi.org/10.1177/2378...
1157
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Jaap van Slageren @jvanslageren.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
En daar is hij weer! Joost Vullings @eenvandaag.nl in podcast de stemming: "de pvda heeft de hoop die pvv kiezer waarvan in oorsprong een heel deel uit de sociaaldemocratie komt aan te trekken." Een stelling die meerdere keren als foutief is aangetoond, maar toch als een soort zombie wordt herhaalt🧵
1922883
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Tadeas Cely @celytadeas.bsky.social · 17/03/2025
📢Proud to share my first publication in European Union Politics, now online and #OpenAccess! I examine which of 19 European countries (1990–2017) saw culture wars emerge in public opinion. I analyze how opinions and identities on morality and economic issues aligned into distinct ideological camps🧵
6204
Jochem van Noord @jochemvannoord.eu · 11/03/2025
Mooie meta-analyse in lijn met ons paper in PSPB èn met ons stuk in de Volkskrant: duidelijke ingroup bias onder hoger opgeleiden (en niet onder lager opgeleiden) in hun stemvoorkeuren
000
Jochem van Noord @jochemvannoord.eu · 11/03/2025
Hoezo is er geen bewijs voor onderwijsgebonden vooroordelen? In @volkskrant.nl met @tkupp.bsky.social en @bramspruyt.bsky.social
volkskrant.nl
Opinie: Hoezo is er geen bewijs voor onderwijsgebonden vooroordelen?
In een column voor de Volkskrant beweerde Sander Schimmelpenninck dat het niet te bewijzen is dat hoogopgeleiden neerkijken op lager opgeleiden. Die stelling negeert helaas vijftien jaar onderzoek naa...
2169
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
European Sociological Review @europeansocreview.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
First issue of 2025 is out! New research findings -most #openaccess- at academic.oup.com/esr/issue/41/1 With contributions by @frankvantubergen.bsky.social @aliciagsierra.bsky.social @martinkolk.bsky.social @nellageurts.bsky.social @jochemvannoord.eu & many more (not found in BS, sorry if they are)
academic.oup.com
Volume 41 Issue 1 | European Sociological Review | Oxford Academic
Publishes original articles in all fields of sociology ranging in length from short research notes up to major reports. It provides a resource of state-of-the-art quantitative and comparative researc...
0217
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Daniël Boomsma @danielboomsma.bsky.social · 11/02/2025
Over die mythe van de ‘verloren arbeider’ aan rechts 🧵 Sociaaldemocratisch links stond massaal kiezers af, maar verloor die de afgelopen decennia in overgrote meerderheid aan groene partijen, andere linkse partijen en liberale (midden)partijen. 1/6
24275120
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Jochem van Noord @jochemvannoord.eu · 07/02/2025
🏁New paper! Social status moderates the effect of belief in meritocracy on economic conflict attitudes. Meritocracy doesn't always legitimize inequality and sometimes it does more :) Published with @bramspruyt.bsky.social Filip Van Droogenbroeck and @tkupp.bsky.social doi.org/10.1111/1468...
Title page of "Caught Between Ideology and Self‐Interest: Subjective
Social Status and Meritocratic Beliefs Shape Whether
People Perceive, Feel Anger About, and Want to Change
Economic Conflict"
Abstract: "Belief in meritocracy and social status are central to understanding how people think and behave in relation to economic conflict. In this paper, we investigate how belief in meritocracy is moderated by (subjective) social status for three different aspects of citizens' attitudes towards economic inequality and conflict, namely (1) perceived conflict, (2) anger about economic inequality and (3) intentions to change economic conflict (egalitarianism). Data from the International Social Survey Programme on 29 countries reveal that the effect of meritocracy depends on social status and differs meaningfully across the three attitudes. For people high in social status, belief in meritocracy relates to lower perceptions of conflict, anger, and egalitarianism. For people with a low subjective social status there is no or a weak relation of belief in meritocracy with the outcomes. In addition, when belief in meritocracy was low, those with a high subjective social status appeared to be concerned about inequality as they perceived more economic conflict and felt more anger than those with a low subjective social status. However, this was not the case for intentions to reduce inequality. Hence, these effects of meritocracy and social status should be understood in light of self-interest concerns of social groups, rather than solely ideological domination."Figure 1: Predicted values of conflict perception across belief in meritocracy and subjective social status.Figure 3: Predicted values of egalitarianism across belief meritocracy and subjective social status.
12011
Jochem van Noord @jochemvannoord.eu · 07/02/2025
🏁New paper! Social status moderates the effect of belief in meritocracy on economic conflict attitudes. Meritocracy doesn't always legitimize inequality and sometimes it does more :) Published with @bramspruyt.bsky.social Filip Van Droogenbroeck and @tkupp.bsky.social doi.org/10.1111/1468...
Title page of "Caught Between Ideology and Self‐Interest: Subjective
Social Status and Meritocratic Beliefs Shape Whether
People Perceive, Feel Anger About, and Want to Change
Economic Conflict"
Abstract: "Belief in meritocracy and social status are central to understanding how people think and behave in relation to economic conflict. In this paper, we investigate how belief in meritocracy is moderated by (subjective) social status for three different aspects of citizens' attitudes towards economic inequality and conflict, namely (1) perceived conflict, (2) anger about economic inequality and (3) intentions to change economic conflict (egalitarianism). Data from the International Social Survey Programme on 29 countries reveal that the effect of meritocracy depends on social status and differs meaningfully across the three attitudes. For people high in social status, belief in meritocracy relates to lower perceptions of conflict, anger, and egalitarianism. For people with a low subjective social status there is no or a weak relation of belief in meritocracy with the outcomes. In addition, when belief in meritocracy was low, those with a high subjective social status appeared to be concerned about inequality as they perceived more economic conflict and felt more anger than those with a low subjective social status. However, this was not the case for intentions to reduce inequality. Hence, these effects of meritocracy and social status should be understood in light of self-interest concerns of social groups, rather than solely ideological domination."Figure 1: Predicted values of conflict perception across belief in meritocracy and subjective social status.Figure 3: Predicted values of egalitarianism across belief meritocracy and subjective social status.
12011
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Frank Beck @diehoren.bsky.social · 19/01/2025
This conversation between Thomas Piketty and Michael Sandel took my understanding of the current political moment to a higher level. I've gifted it to Bluesky, so the paywall at the NY Times won't interfere with your reading.
nytimes.com
Opinion | Two of the World’s Leading Thinkers on How the Left Went Astray (Gift Article)
Thomas Piketty and Michael Sandel debate the value of open borders and what we owe migrants.
45520
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Niels G. Mede @nielsmede.bsky.social · 20/01/2025
Out now in Nature Human Behaviour: Our 68-country #survey on public attitudes to #science 📣 It shows: People still #trust scientists and support an active role of scientists in society and policy-making. #OpenAccess available here: www.nature.com/articles/s41... @natureportfolio.bsky.social (1/13)
7358163
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Peter Egge Langsæther @peterla.bsky.social · 09/01/2025
And here's the share without higher education!
193
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Bryan Boyle @bryanboyle.bsky.social · 08/01/2025
Mine and @dvandebroeck.bsky.social’s paper on ‘The Labor of Distinction’ is out now in ASR. Drawing from an ethnography that involved training and working as a butler, we tell a larger story about elites and inequality (1/18) journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
28434
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 24/11/2024
and this is why it is an analytical mistake to use “voter without a college degree” to mean “working class voter”
362025267
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Jelmer Visser @dietukkerfries.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
Het ✨treinstation van de dag✨ van vandaag is 🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁 Goes
13735
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Jon Worth @jonworth.eu · 17/11/2024
There is verification on this site - via using a domain name as your username. samcoatessky could likewise be fake. But if Sky made samcoates(dot)sky(dot)social that they could do right away, we’d know it was legit. Tories could do likewise.
98223
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Elizabeth Simon @elizabethsim0n.bsky.social · 09/04/2024
Do we systematically prefer educated candidates? Or do educational groups select in ways that reward their own? A note at @thejop.bsky.social by @turnbulldugarte.bsky.social and I suggests the answers are yes, and yes – but only for the graduate group. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
journals.uchicago.edu
Education as identity? A meta-analysis of education-based in-group preferences in candidate choice experiments | The Journal of Politics: Vol 0, No ja
11310
Jochem van Noord @jochemvannoord.eu · 13/03/2024
🏁New paper @ESR_news! We explore, with correlational class analysis, the variaties of belief systems across 23 European countries. We investigate differences in density, dimensionality, demography, and relation to voting behavior. doi.org/10.1093/esr/...
1126
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
mark brandt @mjbsp.bsky.social · 15/02/2024
As part of a large collaboration of social psychologists and sociologists, we tried to understand belief system structure across Europe osf.io/9r84f
34516
Jochem van Noord @jochemvannoord.eu · 22/01/2024
🏁New paper! We find that affective bias towards 'the higher educated' is associated with more political trust, satisfaction w/ democracy and less populism In @actapolitica.bsky.social with Toon Kuppens, @bramspruyt.bsky.social Leandros Kavadias, Celine Darnon & Medhi Marot doi.org/10.1057/s412...
Title & abstract of paper in Acta Politica: Education-based affective attitudes: higher educated-bias is related to more political trust and less populism
12312
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Tarik Abou-Chadi @tabouchadi.bsky.social · 28/12/2023
In January, we are going to launch the Progressive Politics Research Network (PPRNet). It is our goal to make research findings more accessible for the broader public and to engage with journalists, politicians and other practitioners. We focus on the left and progressive field.
38022
Reposted by Jochem van Noord
Stuart Turnbull-Dugarte @turnbulldugarte.com · 07/11/2023
New paper now conditionally accepted at @thejop.bsky.social With @elizabethsim0n.bsky.social - one of the best (& nicest) people in polisky - we ran a meta analysis looking at effects of educational group-based biases in candidate choice experiments. 👉https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hrufe
56318