iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 16/01/2026

Sometimes I'm glad I avoid posting on the Internet. But sometimes I yearn to share my Opinion®

000

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 10/12/2025

Once again my #1 podcast and the longest I listened to were both from @rangedtouch.bsky.social

020

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 05/12/2025

Truly been on a generational run (No I'm not mean these movies are not good)

010

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 08/11/2025

I'm back on bluesky dang

000

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 13/05/2025

Now I have to smell it for the next hour and just yearn for meats huh

000

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 13/05/2025

Coworker walking through the hall with lunch from the bbq place at 2:00pm is crazy I'm sorry. I ate at literally 11:00am

100

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 13/05/2025

The rehearsal is so good, like it's kinda a miracle HBO agreed to fund any of that

000

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 13/05/2025

Thinking about getting really into mechanical pencils

000

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 04/04/2025

Always check what plane you're flying on so you can remember to download YouTube video essays when it doesn't have screens

000

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 15/03/2025

Is this still law or did I miss something?

Text: The War Powers Resolution (also known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 or the War Powers Act) (50 U.S.C. ch. 33) is a federal law intended to check the U.S. president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of the U.S. Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States congressional joint resolution. It provides that the president can send the U.S. Armed Forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization", or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces".

011

Reposted by Hagen

bakoon @bakoon.bsky.social · 15/03/2025

oh grampa no lets get you out of there and cleaned up

472618315

Reposted by Hagen

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez @aoc.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Among the material devastation to everyday people, Senate Dems have now blown a hole in their ability to work with the House. We had an agreed upon plan, House took immense risk, then Senate turned around midway and destroyed it w/ a fear-based, inexplicable abdication. They own what happens next.

561212851025068

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Resign if you have any dignity

000

Reposted by Hagen

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez @aoc.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Cool so what happens if GOP attach a national abortion ban to a CR? You'll vote for that too? 🚮

49818536713738

Reposted by Hagen

Adam Serwer @adamserwer.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

American politics makes a lot more sense when you realize that the GOP is afraid of pissing off the GOP base, and the Dems are afraid of pissing off the GOP base, but neither party is afraid of pissing off the Dem base.

14625295413268

Reposted by Hagen

Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

They're *already* shutting down large parts of the government and, as an added bonus, inflicting permanent damage on other parts of it. Shutting it all down would be a *better* route, honestly. All you've done here is give a bipartisan stamp of approval to their agenda of closures and cuts.

371277206

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Loser coward behavior. Don't ever ask us for money again

000

Reposted by Hagen

onion person @junlper.beer · 14/03/2025

you simply do not understand the democratic party strategy. this will allow them to fundraise big numbers for their consultants off the Horrors that will take place

292229220

Reposted by Hagen

jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 14/03/2025

whether they’re retiring or not this should be the last term for each of them

353123782684

Reposted by Hagen

Michael @fleerultra.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

my read: he was a yes the entire time, he lied, and we should assume many of those who were hemming and hawing and saying no position or talking about the amendment deal were potential yes’s too, and this lack of clarity was all about figuring out who was falling on the grenade for the rest of them

382009320

Reposted by Hagen

onion person @junlper.beer · 14/03/2025

primary every single one on this list

382044344

Reposted by Hagen

My Name is Grant @mynameisgrant.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Man talks about fighting the president’s agenda but he’s losing to a chair.

2569

Reposted by Hagen

Michael @fleerultra.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

better to pressure a "good" one who still didn't object to unanimous consent or seek to oust that entire leadership class and their consultants than to accidentally miss someone who desperately needs to be shown the door

228250

Reposted by Hagen

Will Stancil @whstancil.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

you have to make them prove they're on the good guy team, and the way to do that is to primary them until they break with schumer and leadership

524819

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Shame on you, even with no election to face you have no spine

020

Reposted by Hagen

Nina Turner @ninaturner.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Here are the “Democratic” Senators that voted YES on the GOP budget that doesn’t protect Medicare and Social Security: Schumer-NY Fetterman-PA Cortez-Masto-NV Durbin-IL King-ME Schatz-HI Hassan-NH Peters-MI Gillibrand-NY Shaheen-NH They should all face primaries.

1231590544

Reposted by Hagen

Jon Bois @jonbois.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

as far as i'm concerned the entire purpose of the american experiment is to provide chuck schumer with a job that's not too challenging, yet rewarding and fun. and i hate to put it to you like this, but every criticism you post, and every phone call you make to his office, gets in the way of that

9586181044

Reposted by Hagen

Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 14/03/2025

REPORTER: Is it time for new leadership in the Senate? JEFFRIES: Next question

3042590343

Reposted by Hagen

Rachel Levinson-Waldman @rlevinsonwaldman.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

Things are moving quickly, but it looks like these Sen's especially need calls from *constituents* to vote NO on cloture: Angus King (ME) Amy Klobuchar (MN) Jacky Rosen (NV) Brian Schatz (HI) Maggie Hassan (NH) Jeanne Shaheen (NH) Gary Peters (MI) Capitol switchboard is 202-224-3121.

13225271607

Reposted by Hagen

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez @aoc.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

KEEP CALLING. PEEL OFF ALL DEM SENATORS YOU CAN. ☎️: (202) 224-3121 Tell them to vote NO on Cloture and NO on CR. Vote is pushed to after 1:15ish for now. Situation is fluid. The only public YES votes are Schumer and Fetterman. They need 7-8 total. KEEP CALLING. Call retiring Senators too!

29656614219494

Reposted by Hagen

Eve Ettinger @eveettinger.com · 14/03/2025

UPDATED LIST. Whitehouse is also a no on cloture. Let's get talking to: Schatsz Hirono Durbin Peters Klobuchar Cortez Masto Rosen Hassan Shaheen Cantwell and King in addition to the NY sens who are already hearing it every which way. IF YOUR SENATOR IS STILL NOT A NO ON CLOTURE, CALL.

17282142

Reposted by Hagen

Brad Johnson @climatebrad.hillheat.com · 14/03/2025

NOW: The coward @schumer.senate.gov has closed his office at Hart 211 to the public. @sunrisemvmt.bsky.social activists are occupying the hallway with the signs SCHUMER: DON'T BE A COWARD OUR FUTURE IS ON FIRE: ACT LIKE IT

SCHUMER: DON'T BE A COWARD
OUR FUTURE IS ON FIRE: ACT LIKE IT

8389117

Reposted by Hagen

Dan Clyne @danclyne.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

God dammit. Timing couldn’t be worse but here goes. Chuck Schumer and I are launching our new podcast “Soul Deep: A Weekly Deep Dive Into the Music of Collective Soul” tomorrow. I do NOT support his latest decision and want to make clear this is strictly a music podcast. Please check it out

1068123781170

Reposted by Hagen

andy™ @andylevy.net · 14/03/2025

wow schumer must've written this really quickly because the other alternative is that he was always gonna vote for the CR

471853331

Reposted by Hagen

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez @aoc.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

I think some in the Senate have convinced themselves that the backlash to folding will be limited to “the left” and therefore ignorable. Those people are deeply and profoundly misreading the moment and the stakes. Virtually every swing district House Dem walked the plank to vote NO for a reason.

491413101124236

Reposted by Hagen

Dave Levitan @davelevitan.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

NEW: I heard from a *bunch* of federal employees tonight with more backbone that Chuck Schumer. Spread the word! "Shutdowns suck, but what we’re experiencing is something much much worse and now is the moment to stand against it or you’re abdicating your duty as an elected official.”

splinter.com

'If You Don't Fight, You Can't Win': Federal Employees Want Chuck Schumer and the Democrats to Grow a Spine

Splinter is your home for news and opinions that challenge power in our political and economic system that's becoming more unhinged each and every day.

252357779

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 14/03/2025

The first chance you have to fight and you can't even pretend to

020

Reposted by Hagen

jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 14/03/2025

these people swore an oath to defend the constitution but i guess that’s just too hard

561137092165

Hagen @hatumex.bsky.social · 13/03/2025

Tell him he needs to grow a spine

000