Sign in

Cofactor Ltd

@cofactor.bsky.social
114 followers 371 following 9 posts

Cofactor Ltd - Specialized in courses for academics on research writing, grant applications, and more. Over 10 years of empowering scholars! 🌐 cofactorscience.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
LSE Impact @lseimpactblog.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
🗣️"Scientific writing isn’t the packaging around knowledge. It’s one of the key places of knowledge production itself" #AcWri #AcademicSky
blogs.lse.ac.uk
What we lose when we outsource scientific writing - LSE Impact
Writing is often said to be thinking. Based on a study of scientific writing practices, this post analyses what is lost when academic writing is outsourced.
14221 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Rahul K @theresearch.bsky.social · 10/02/2026
Excited to share our @chemrxiv.org preprint on metabolically active living materials #MALMs with physciochemical biocontainment🧵 Why do we need #MALMs? Because as @economist.com posits additive manufacturing is potentially a better way to make drinks and drugs We argue #MALMs are the key for it
economist.com
A better way to make drinks and drugs
Print me a brewery
154 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Aize Pellón Rodríguez @aizepellon.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
We just published a new paper in Science Advances, where we uncover how #Candida albicans reprograms the metabolism of oral epithelial cells during infection. As first and corresponding author, I’m excited to share what we found — and why it matters. #Skytorial #Immunometabolism #MedMycoSky
241 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
FEMS @femsmicro.org · 08/02/2026
We asked two microbiologists, Antonella Colque and Nurdana Orynbek, to test a selection of AI tools built for scientific publishing and research. The goal? To see how well these tools perform in real research tasks. Here is what worked for them. And what did not : buff.ly/rm3775c
144 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Rahul K @theresearch.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
Additive Manufacturing of Metabolically Active Living Materials with Physicochemical Biocontainment @chemrxiv.org #ELMs #livingmaterials #MALM chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10....
285 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Rahul K @theresearch.bsky.social · 17/01/2026
Yes, it can happen here! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Can'... 📚 #BookSky #bookreading
Cover image of It Can’t Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis
051 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Rahul K @theresearch.bsky.social · 01/01/2026
Happy New Year 2026 🥳 🎆 🎊 Thank you all for following along here, and may all of us stay curious about the world around us! Starting off 2026 with @edyong209.bsky.social ‘s brilliant book, #animmenseworld, beautifully explaining the concept of #Umwelt 🇩🇪: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umwelt
A cover image of book ‘An Immense World’ by Ed Yong
0121 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Alejandro Montenegro @aemonten.bsky.social · 27/12/2025
Yup, despite policies, many won't disclose AI use because they feel it might somehow count against them. Also, policies without consequences are typically ignored. www.arxiv.org/abs/2512.06705
arxiv.org
Academic journals' AI policies fail to curb the surge in AI-assisted academic writing
The rapid integration of generative AI into academic writing has prompted widespread policy responses from journals and publishers. However, the effectiveness of these policies remains unclear. Here, ...
152 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing: a 🧵 1/n Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.

1. The four-fold drain

1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
8644453 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
eLife @elife.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
1/ Want to try your hand at science communication but don’t know where to start? We put together seven tried and tested tips for communicating preprinted research with suggestions and resources that can help you on social media and beyond! #SciComm 🔗 buff.ly/1jesQg5
184 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
openrxiv.org
Enabling options for review: from training and transparency to author-centered AI tools - openRxiv
Peer review is widely viewed as a critical aspect of biomedical communication. Ideally, it provides authors with feedback so they can improve manuscripts and gives readers, particularly nonspecialists...
911664 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Social Media Lab @socialmedialab.ca · 02/11/2025
Surprise, it took this long: In a bid to stem the tsunami of AI-written papers, arXiv’s CS just changed its submission policy, requiring that all articles and position papers must now be accepted at a journal or a conference and complete a successful peer review. blog.arxiv.org/2025/10/31/a...
blog.arxiv.org
Attention Authors: Updated Practice for Review Articles and Position Papers in arXiv CS Category – arXiv blog
145 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Rahul K @theresearch.bsky.social · 24/10/2025
Pleased to share our latest #AEM publication showing that #yeast Rhodotorula toruloides’ sense and response mechanism for nitrogen can be deployed for exopolysaccharide #biopolymer production (h/t @asm.org). A brief thread 🧵 Illustration credit: Dr. Stefania Vaga (h/t @cofactor.bsky.social)
A two-panel watercolor painting of yeast showing a sense and response mechanism as it produces a biopolymer. (Illustration credit: Dr. Stefania Vaga @cofactor.bsky.social)
1114 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Madhu Pai, MD, PhD @madhupai.bsky.social · 14/01/2025
2025 will be a tough year for the fight against disinformation, anti-science, anti-vaccine and anti-public health These books can help prepare us communities.springernature.com/posts/want-t...
communities.springernature.com
Want to better understand the growing anti-science and anti-public health movement? These books can help!
2025 promises to be a tough year for the fight against disinformation, anti-science, anti-vaccine and anti-public health. Thankfully, American physicians and scientists have published books that can h...
15316 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Skillfluence @skillfluence.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
Here’s our starter pack for cohort based training for researchers and PhD students. Includes CDT’s, DTP’s, DTC’s and other cohort based networks and clusters. Please suggest others to add. go.bsky.app/FMNKtv6
041 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Holly Prescott @holby83.bsky.social · 13/01/2025
*NEW PhD CAREERS BLOG POST* What to do when you don't meet some of the job 'requirements?' I've devised an approach inspired by baking (humour me...) to see how you can substitute out ‘ingredients’ (requirements) for others that do a similar job. phd-careers.co.uk/2025/01/13/i...
phd-careers.co.uk
I have a PhD but don't meet all the requirements for this job. What do I do? - PostGradual: The PhD Careers Blog
‘How many of the criteria do I need to meet to be considered for a job?’ It’s a question that never goes away. It’s a particular bugbear for researchers looking to move into sectors beyond academia, a...
084 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Alejandro Montenegro @aemonten.bsky.social · 12/01/2025
Being a PI is just one of many things you can do with your PhD. And doing *any* of those things is a successful outcome of your training and graduate school time. The fact that a school or lab produces more of one of those things doesn't make it better.
05213 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Adhd Wisdom Tools @adhdwisdomtools.bsky.social · 09/01/2025
adhdwisdomtools.substack.com/p/recharge-y...
adhdwisdomtools.substack.com
🔋 Recharge Your Energy: Recovering from ADHD Burnout
Feeling drained and overwhelmed? ADHD burnout can be challenging, but with the right strategies, you can regain your energy and thrive! Here’s how?
023 0
Cofactor Ltd @cofactor.bsky.social · 12/01/2025
Gender gaps in academia: even in fields with gender parity (in number), women are 40% more likely to leave research within 20 years. #GenderGap #WomenInScience #AcademicInequality #WomenInResearch #AcademicCareers www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Who’s quitting academia? Data reveal gender gaps in surprising fields
Even in scientific areas in which women are well represented, they are up to 40% more likely than men to leave research within 20 years.
020 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Thiago Carvalho @cyrilpedia.bsky.social · 25/12/2024
'Before there was arXiv, there was Joanne Cohn (...) She started an informal exchange of string theory manuscripts that eventually became the arXiv preprint server, which has since revolutionized the way scientists share ideas and announce findings.' pubs.aip.org/physicstoday...
pubs.aip.org
Joanne Cohn and the email list that led to arXiv
A strong sense of community led an early-career string theorist to share preprints in a scientifically competitive environment.
213752 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Colleen Kennedy-Karpat @cbkenkar.bsky.social · 08/01/2025
This is an important history, and it ends on a note of optimism, but I remain convinced that the most important element of effective resistance to AI in scholarly literature is consistent and perceptive peer review.
3163 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Nature @nature.com · 10/01/2025
Meta’s planned shift away from third party fact-checking in favour of a crowdsourced approach has perplexed those who study the spread of misinformation. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Facebook to ditch fact-checking: what do researchers think?
Meta’s planned shift away from third party fact-checking in favour of a crowdsourced approach has perplexed those who study the spread of misinformation.
28315 0
Cofactor Ltd @cofactor.bsky.social · 09/01/2025
Understanding neurodiversity can be complex. This annotated reading list, developed by a neurodiverse team, addresses key themes such as lived experience, anti-ableism, and inclusive research practices. elifesciences.org/articles/102...
elifesciences.org
Point of View: An annotated introductory reading list for neurodiversity
A collaboratively developed annotated reading list expands upon core themes in neurodiversity, aiming to enhance understanding and to promote rigorous, destigmatizing, and inclusive practices in resea...
010 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 08/01/2025
Yes it's important people understand a preprint hasn't been peer-reviewed. BUT it's also important to understand that what "peer-reviewed" means varies considerably, in some cases signifying nothing... www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Preprints often make news. Many people don’t know what they are
The public needs context about unreviewed manuscripts, survey suggests
914543 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Daphne Jackson Trust @daphnejacksontr.bsky.social · 10/12/2024
Take a look at our new fellowship opportunity with Lancaster University, closing 19th January: daphnejackson.org/fellowship/l...
022 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Ria Cheyne @riacheyne.bsky.social · 07/01/2025
UK #AcademicSky: does anyone have experience of (academic) coaching, or a coach they'd recommend? I can access some funding for this but feeling a bit overwhelmed. Especially keen to hear from neurodivergent folk, or people who've had coaching for burnout and/or perfectionism.
699 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Eloquenti 🧪✍️📚 @eloquenti.com · 26/11/2024
✨A starter pack of professional #editors providing #scientific #editing services to #researchers, #publishers, and #writers 🧪✍️📝📚 #AcademicPublishing #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicSky #Academia #SciComm #ScholComm #OpenAccess #research #science #PhD #proofreading #amediting #grantwriting #publishing
154720 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Eloquenti 🧪✍️📚 @eloquenti.com · 07/01/2025
🦋 A starter pack of scholarly organizations supporting #research and #science 🔬🧪🧬 🧫 🔭 #AcademicSky #Academia #AcademicChatter #Academics #AcademicWriting #AcademicPublishing #ScienceWriting #SciWri #SciencePublishing #PeerReview #SciComm #ScholComm #SciSky #MedSky #BlueSky #OpenScience #PhDSky #PhD
1416244 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 07/01/2025
Btw - this is another case where my frequent point that not just IF but also PubMed/PMC are obstacles to innovation applies: if a journal does a novel form of post-hoc change that doesn't fit in PubMed's rigid framework, it's not registered (so is disincentivized)
293 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Science Magazine @science.org · 06/01/2025
#NextGenSci gave young scientists this prompt: Write a pair of haiku. In the first, describe academia or your field in 2025; in the second, describe your predictions for 2050. Read a selection of the responses: scim.ag/3Wa7gw9
scim.ag
NextGen Voices: 2025 and 2050, in haiku
0172 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Wellcome Trust @wellcometrust.bsky.social · 06/01/2025
Looking for climate and health research funding? We're funding teams to investigate how climate mitigation solutions affect health in low- and middle-income countries. 🗓️ Pre-applications due: 18 February 2025 Learn more ⤵️ wellcome.org/grant-fundin...
wellcome.org
Climate and Health Award: Advancing climate mitigation solutions with health co-benefits in low- and middle-income countries - Grant Funding| Wellcome
This funding call will generate a body of evidence on the health effects of climate change mitigation interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
02218 0
Cofactor Ltd @cofactor.bsky.social · 04/01/2025
Neuroscientist Catherine Croft shares her journey from research to science communication and education, finding purpose and impact beyond the lab. #CareerChange #ScienceEducation @catlilly.bsky.social www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
As an early-career researcher, I loved doing outreach. So I made it my career
“My new path wasn’t as straightforward as the academic route,” this educator writes
010 0
Cofactor Ltd @cofactor.bsky.social · 03/01/2025
Looking for a way to practice your writing and shape your ideas before formalizing them into a paper? Check out this resource on blog posts and op-eds in global health: communities.springernature.com/posts/where-...
communities.springernature.com
Where Can I Publish My Global Health Blog Post or Op-Ed?
This is a crowd-sourced list of blogs and media platforms that publish opinion pieces and commentaries
000 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Kay Guccione @kayguccione.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
Written for all who mentor or coach in universities, this book addresses a critical question: how can mentoring and coaching conversations be effective and accessible ways to support researcher and academic development? #ResearchCulture #ResearcherDevelopment blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/pro...
blackwells.co.uk
Coaching and Mentoring for Academic Development
Learning through dialogue brings a powerful opportunity to navigate professional demands and meet the challenges of a turbulent world. Written for all who mento
4258 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Julie Cruse @academicabuse.com · 01/01/2025
🪩 Happy #NewYear! 🪩 Calling all advocates who are passionate about the mission to #EndAcademicAbuse. Let's build out this list so we can all find each other! DM or comment to be added or suggest others. @academic-chatter.bsky.social @academicsky.org @edusky.bsky.social bsky.app/profile/did:...
152 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Madhu Pai, MD, PhD @madhupai.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
“a well-organized, financed, politically motivated, and steadily globalizing campaign of disinformation & attacks against science that makes it difficult to mount an effective global response to the climate & pandemic threats” @michaelemann.bsky.social & Hotez skepticalinquirer.org/2024/12/a-tr...
skepticalinquirer.org
A Triple Threat to Humanity: Climate Change, Pandemics, and Anti-Science | Skeptical Inquirer
Over the past decade, many of us in the scientific community have come to appreciate the existential threat we face today—a threat unlike any we’ve witnesse ...
619885 0
Cofactor Ltd @cofactor.bsky.social · 01/01/2025
Academic writing is evolving, but clarity is a growing challenge. www.economist.com/science-and-...
economist.com
Academic writing is getting harder to read—the humanities most of all
We analyse two centuries of scholarly work
000 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Bluesky @bsky.app · 03/12/2024
Scientists, academics, researchers: We’re excited to share that @altmetric.com is now tracking mentions of your research on Bluesky! 🧪
456294744994 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Justin Jackson @justinjackson.ca · 29/11/2024
I keep finding cool 3rd-party apps and projects built for Bluesky, so I've started to collect them all here: justinjackson.ca/best-bluesky... Did I miss any?
justinjackson.ca
Best Bluesky apps, projects, tools I've found
A collection of cool apps and projects built on the AT Protocol: analytics tools, dashboards, and custom feed builders.
5021151 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Science Magazine @science.org · 26/12/2024
"I began to see my time off not as a failure, but as a necessary pause." #ScienceWorkingLife scim.ag/3PxSewJ
scim.ag
I took a break from work to protect my health. This should be more accepted in academia
Better support structures would “lead to a more inclusive, productive, and humane workplace for everyone,” this physician-scientist writes
010621 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Itai Yanai @itaiyanai.bsky.social · 09/11/2024
Doing good science is 90% finding a science buddy to constantly talk to about the project.
22877215 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Madhu Pai, MD, PhD @madhupai.bsky.social · 27/12/2024
International #EpidemicPreparednessDay There is no epidemic preparedness until we make sure Global South countries have access to lifesaving vaccines & medicines www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
science.org
Science should save all, not just some
Discussions around global equity and justice in science typically emphasize the lack of diversity in the editorial boards of scientific journals, inequities in authorship, “parachute research,” domina...
06117 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
eLife @elife.bsky.social · 28/12/2024
Earlier this year we proudly launched the Community Voices podcast 🎉 Created eLife’s very own staff, we embark on inspiring conversations with scientists about their lives and passions. Catch up with the latest episodes 👇 #12DaysOfeLife buff.ly/4fwYqPU
buff.ly
Community | eLife Community Voices · eLife
Hear from researchers across the globe about what matters to them in relation to research culture.
085 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Dr Zoë Ayres @zjayres.bsky.social · 16/11/2024
Mental health during your PhD - some of the challenges that PhD students face. #AcademicMentalHealth
This poster explores some of the common stressors that PhD researchers face during their undergraduate studies.

Number 1: Impostor syndrome.
Most prevalent in women and minority groups, feelings of not deserving to be on your PhD despite having earned it are rife. 

Number 2: Financial concerns.
Money worries can lead to increased stress will stop waiting long time periods to receive for example, conference reimbursement can exasperate the issue. 

Number 3: Competitive landscape.
Competition not collaboration is often fostered. Given no two PhDs are the same comparing your PhD to someone else's can be deflating. 

Number 4: Papers, please. 
Focus on research output can lead to feelings of not being good enough if you do not have N publications. 
Number 5: Isolation/guilt. 
Writing a thesis can be isolating. This can also be coupled with feelings of guilt when taking breaks. 

Number 6: Culture of acceptance. 
In academia, there is a culture of acceptance that mental health issues are part of the journey. This needs to change. 

Number 7: No more tick boxes. 
Transitioning from taught courses to research committee of course particularly given their open ended nature of research. 
. 

Number 8: Tough relationships. 
Supervisor student relationships be it an absence supervisor, or overbearing, can be particularly tough to manage. 

Number 9: Presenteeism. 
Maintaining a work life balance can be difficult with the academic culture of overwork. 

Number 10: First time failing. 
Students undertaking a PhD have often never experienced failure, having done well in previous studies. 
Part of the mental health series by Dr Zoë Ayres free to distribute.
97424 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Dr Zoë Ayres @zjayres.bsky.social · 19/11/2024
The perils of a postdoc #AcademicMentalHealth What people might be struggling with behind the scenes
This poster explores some of the common stressors that postdoctoral researchers face during their postdoc. Image shows "perils of a postdoc, mental health awareness' with a person climbing a mountain, surrounded by examples of mental health challenges. 


Number 1: Compete or perish. 
With extremely limited tenure positions, postdocs can feel pitted against one another to achieve a permanent faculty position. 

Number 2: Need for independence. 
The need for independence in order to apply for fellowships is high, but stepping out from under a PIs  can be tough. Having a support to pursue an academic career from the PI is often essential. 
With the increasing size of academic cohorts, 

Number 3: Position instability. 
The prevalence of short-term contracts can lead to anxiety and their inabilities to settle down in a particular location, having financial and personal impact.

Number 4: Alt-academia sell-out 
The narrative often is that if you opt to choose an alternative career outside of academia you have failed and sold out. 
Number 5: A star is born. 
Corresponding author positions are often needed to show research independence but achieving this can be difficult without already having had a permanent faculty position. 

Number 6: burnout or drop out. 
The culture of research often implies that if you are not working 24/7 you are not passionate about research resulting in feelings of guilt and ultimately leaving academia. 
Number 7: don't get stuck. 
There is often pressure to not get stuck in a post doc and move on to the next opportunity else you may never make it. 

Number 8: Global challenges. 
The need to be mobile and get experience in different postdocs around the world is often emphasised. This can lead to culture integration issues and separation from loved ones 

Number 9: teaching experience.
To progress in academia teaching experience is needed but opportunities to do so often very limited, ultimately affecting progression. 
…
28732 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Wikimedia Foundation @wikimediafoundation.org · 17/12/2024
Wikipedia is the only website in the top-ten most-visited websites to be run by a nonprofit organization. We are not funded by ads. We don’t charge subscription fees. We don’t sell your data. We operate primarily on donations from people like you. Read ➡️ wikimediafoundation.org/news/2024/11...
7 reasons why you should donate to Wikipedia
616290 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Oded Rechavi @odedrechavi.bsky.social · 26/12/2024
What's your "Paper of the Year"? Join us and link your favorite one and let's create the best reading list ever :) @petrovadmitri.bsky.social Here's my favorite of 2024: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39481381/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Viroid-like colonists of human microbiomes - PubMed
Here, we describe "obelisks," a class of heritable RNA elements sharing several properties: (1) apparently circular RNA ∼1 kb genome assemblies, (2) predicted rod-like genome-wide secondary structures...
35814 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 19/11/2024
The strain on scientific publishing: we set out to characterise the remarkable growth of the scientific literature in the last few years, in spite of declining growth in total scientists. What is going on? direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... A 🧵 1/n #AcademicSky #PhDchat #ScientificPublishing #SciPub
44994558 0
Reposted by Cofactor Ltd
Nature @nature.com · 27/12/2024
Nature's podcast team select some of their favourite stories from the past 12 months. 🧪 www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
The Nature Podcast highlights of 2024
Listen to our reporters’ podcast highlights of 2024.
0239 0
Cofactor Ltd @cofactor.bsky.social · 27/12/2024
Suing major academic publishers, alleging antitrust violations that exploit unpaid labor and slow scientific progress. www.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/ac...
lieffcabraser.com
Academic Journal Publishers Antitrust Litigation
Academic Journal Publishers Antitrust Litigation On September 12, 2024, Lieff Cabraser and co-counsel at Justice Catalyst Law filed a federal antitrust lawsuit on behalf of plaintiff Lucina Uddin in...
000 0