Sign in

Laura Grima

@lauragrima.bsky.social
2.7K followers 1.1K following 271 posts

Research Scientist in the Dudman lab @HHMIJanelia. PhD @Oxford, BSc @RoyalHolloway. dopamine | foraging | decision-making | hippocampus | reinforcement learning 🧠🧪👩‍🔬🐭💻 Wondering what mice are thinking about.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Laura Grima
Jakob Voigts @jvoigts.bsky.social · 11/10/2026
How do 🐁deal with complex landscapes? Turns out they learn a lot very quickly. We think they do this by learning a set of repeated sparse paths, which form a type of compressed world model. Joint work with the Hermundstad lab, led by Tzuhsuan Ma and Alison Comrie: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
213756
Reposted by Laura Grima
Eric Denovellis @eric-denovellis.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
I wanted to highlight the work of Alison Comrie et al. that recently came out in Neuron and I don’t think it is getting enough attention: paper: cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(26)00674-4 #neuroskyence
25324
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 11/10/2026
Highlighting a couple of lovely behavior-focused preprints from some of the newer rodent neuro labs at Janelia: mice hunting crickets in the @emilyjanedennis.bsky.social lab (tinyurl.com/5fenwwh8) and exploring structured, complex environments in the @jvoigts.bsky.social lab (tinyurl.com/4ewsvvhw)
biorxiv.org
04217
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
It's like you're in my brain, Balatro and all
030
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
Then again, maybe it’s not too different to awarding a Nobel for discovery of place cells (which are obviously a topic of continued debate). Seems like maybe the key is distinguishing between claims of observation vs. function.
140
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
Awarding Nobels for conceptual advances does seem potentially more contentious…Although perhaps justifiable here if based just on impact rather than ‘correctness’.
140
Reposted by Laura Grima
Shervin Safavi @neuroprinciplist.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
We are thrilled 🥳 to share that we’re joining forces with @roxana-zeraati.bsky.social to establish a joint research unit, @cmc-unit.bsky.social integrating embodied and natural decision making across species! We also have open PhD and postdoc positions (check below for more info) 🎉
310620
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Thanks Dennis! Hope you’re well :)
001
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Thanks Drew!
000
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Thanks Mark!
000
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Grateful to have been selected as an Allen Institute Next Generation Leader - and for the opportunity to learn from and engage with this wonderful community!
4592
Reposted by Laura Grima
Lauren Burgeno @laurenburgeno.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
🚨 New Walton × Bogacz Collab Preprint! POV: dopamine refuses to have just one job.🧠 DLS dopamine carries distinct reward AND action prediction errors — parallel teaching signals that could support value learning and habit formation. Enjoyed working with Yuhao, Juan Carlos, et al. on this one!
doi.org
02210
Reposted by Laura Grima
bioRxiv Neuroscience @biorxiv-neursci.bsky.social · 03/08/2026
Dopamine dips during unrewarded actions promote punishment-resistant reward seeking www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/20…
0159
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Don’t want to distract from Drew’s take home message here: that often psychology’s endeavour to become more rigorous is underappreciated (by neuroscientists), which I very much agree with!
020
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Also: a good understanding of statistical models often results in a better understanding of the structure of the data. Similar to having to articulate quantitative models more broadly when attempting to understand one process, usually results in higher precision, better follow up experiments etc
131
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
And yet there are plenty of neurophysiology papers out there that eg exalt in their low p values thanks to treating every neuron as an individual subject. Just saying - when stats is done neuroscientists often aren’t great at it ;) Agreed the utility/necessity of stats per se is another question…
140
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
They’re also way better at stats…!
160
Reposted by Laura Grima
Spencer LaVere Smith @spencerlaveresmith.bsky.social · 13/07/2026
Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse - with @michaelgoard.bsky.social @crisniell.bsky.social @mbeyeler.bsky.social Visual computations that are engaged in ecological contexts: active sensing, motion processing, scene analysis, distance estimation, and spatial perception. doi.org/10.1146/annu...
16023
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 11/07/2026
Congrats Kurt!
100
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
#fens2026 has revealed to me a real diversity in how neuroscientists use travelators.
140
Reposted by Laura Grima
Open Neuroscience @open-neuroscience.com · 07/07/2026
📜 Project Showcase 🛠️ pyControl: Open source, Python-based, behavioural experiment control. 👩‍💻 🧑‍💻 Developed by Thomas Akam 👀 To learn more about it: open-neuroscience.com/en/post/pyco... #OpenSoftware #OpenScience #OpenSource
pyControl
Open source, Python-based,
behavioural experiment control.pyControl is a system of open source hardware
and software for controlling behavioural
experiments in neuroscience and psychology,
built around the MicroPython microcontroller.pyControl is a user-friendly and flexible tool
addressing a commonly encountered use case
in behavioural neuroscience:
(1) Defining behavioural tasks as extended state machines.
(2) Running them efficiently as high-throughput experiments.
(3) Communicating task logic to other researchers
183
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
Super cool study, love it when people ask these sorts of questions. Very naive q on my part though: the reduction in energy cost after learning isn’t anything to do with behavior also getting less complex? (Or maybe that’s the point?)
020
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
I’m kind of out of my element with Barrels (looking forward to learning a lot about cortex! ;) ) so I’m not 100% sure. But my understanding is that they’ve attached it to FENS this year instead of SfN, I think?
010
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
Looking forward to speaking at Barrels Meeting this Saturday, and a poster this Tuesday afternoon at #FENS2026 - PS02-07PM-083. Presenting mostly published work but sneaking in some new CA1 data/analyses that I’m excited about and keen to discuss…!
120
Reposted by Laura Grima
David Robbe @davidrobbe.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
Excited to share our new paper: "The Tower Foraging Park: A paradigm for studying cognitive and motor processes underlying behavioral flexibility in freely moving mice,". Out now in @cp-iscience.bsky.social 🧵1/9 www.cell.com/iscience/ful...
cell.com
The Tower Foraging Park: A paradigm for studying cognitive and motor processes underlying behavioral flexibility in freely moving mice
Biological sciences; Behavioral neuroscience; Laboratory animal science
33410
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Really enjoyed reading this, I find the idea very interesting - and totally agreed it would bring people together, which is important! Deciding on what the benchmarks should be seems crucial and a bit tricky, though. But again, likely better than the alternative (nothing) which we have now…
010
Reposted by Laura Grima
Tim Behrens @behrenstimb.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
This paper is an absolutely beautiful combination of a deep set of cognitive ideas, a super creative task, a surprisingly impressive behaviour, and an elegant modelling framework. One of my favourite things in the last year.
15715
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
Congratulations Malcolm!
010
Reposted by Laura Grima
Michael Totty @mictott.bsky.social · 05/06/2026
And here's another for all the ventral striatum / olfactory tubercle folks. It's hard not to love the Calleja and interface islands.
183
Reposted by Laura Grima
peterdoohan.bsky.social @peterdoohan.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
How do brains plan actions towards goals? To get at this question we studied mice navigating complex mazes as goals changed on every trial 🧵 Work with @thomasakam.bsky.social @behrenstimb.bsky.social @kristorpjensen.bsky.social now on BioRxiv: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
411846
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
this), especially in a more continuous action space. The modelling in my recent paper might be more ‘familiar’ in the sense of action selection that you speak of. But again, I think you’re totally right here that there are different conventions at work and it’s interesting to ask why
000
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
Sorry for being slow to respond - but in short, totally agree that part of this comes down to species-differences in how we typically model these processes (which I find quite fascinating!) Exactly how to model the policy has also been an interest in the lab (some previous work might speak to
100
Reposted by Laura Grima
Raymond Chua @raymondrchua.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Excited to share our new paper accepted at ICML 2026 with @tyrellturing.bsky.social and Doina Precup! 🇰🇷 See you in Seoul. A major challenge in continual reinforcement learning is balancing: • plasticity (learning new things) • stability (not forgetting old ones) 🧵 1/15
14113
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
do predict sensitivity to reward size and some don’t.
110
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
supposed to all do the same thing but eg can’t fit each other’s data. In the paper specifically they state that RPE RL models are equivocal about effects of reward size (also discussed at length in the supp) and I think that’s fair considering exactly what you’ve pointed out - some RL models
130
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
account for such effects (and indeed this is an approach others have taken - extend/alter the classical formulation until it fits the data, and typically thus current dogma). I think one has to question what one learns from an exercise that results in a ‘family’ of models that are apparently
120
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
out - some RL models do predict sensitivity to reward size and some don’t.
000
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
models that are apparently supposed to all do the same thing but eg can’t fit each other’s data. In the paper specifically they state that RPE RL models are equivocal about effects of reward size (also discussed at length in the supp) and I think that’s fair considering exactly what you’ve pointed
100
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
The ‘flexibility’ with which we (in the field) specify our RL models is something often discussed in our lab. Hard to get into detail here but, briefly, vanilla TDRL doesn’t predict a change in the efficiency of learning with reward size. One can imagine ways to alter the classical formulation to
110
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
Yes, indeed - this is pointed out in the intro, there are some nice classical psychology studies on this. But typically ignored by neuroscientists, not accounted for in (many) RL models, and not understood mechanistically until now
130
Reposted by Laura Grima
Miguel Nunez @nunezkant.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
1/ 🚨🚨Preprint alert! "Perfect" isn't always smart 🧠. Anyone can tell apart two stimuli (including our mice). But how do we extract rules that apply to new stimuli? 🧵 biorxiv.org/content/10.6... @marius10p.bsky.social @computingnature.bsky.social #neuroAI #neuroscience #AI
13617
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 23/05/2026
@fluketc.bsky.social and @dudman.bsky.social have hit it out the park again. In my (perhaps biased) opinion this - along with their previous papers - is field-defining work. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
science.org
Reward magnitude determines reinforcement learning efficiency
Standard animal learning studies minimize individual reward magnitudes to maximize the repetitions of reinforced behaviors. We investigated how reward magnitude influences initial learning across five...
28325
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 23/05/2026
Friends don’t let friends say knack I prefer the more refined, sophisticated “the accumbens” personally
120
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
Congratulations Roxana!
110
Reposted by Laura Grima
Brad Hulse @bradkhulse.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
Story time friends... Ring attractor networks rely on fine-tuned symmetric connectivity. The fly head direction network has ring attractor dynamics but heterogeneous connectivity. How is this possible? 1/🧵 Link: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
58830
Reposted by Laura Grima
Ling-Qi Zhang @lingqiz.bsky.social · 18/05/2026
It’s very fun to analyze other people’s data for your favorite model and theory, but data reuse actually takes a huge amount of effort. We tested if current agentic AI can help with data reuse. Conclusion: it definitely can, but requires careful human supervision. #AIforScience #compneuro #neuroAI
094
Reposted by Laura Grima
Paul Kristian LaFosse @lafosse.bsky.social · 15/05/2026
🚨 Ever wanted a simple way to control the activity of thousands of neurons? We introduce an all-optical raster photostimulation method to do just that! w/ @computingnature.bsky.social @marius10p.bsky.social #FluorescenceFriday #neuroskyence www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6... 1/n
25921
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 15/05/2026
Oh no, I don’t have claim over any of this! If anything it’s our LLM overlords we should thank (or at least one helped me design my site a lot haha)
010
Laura Grima @lauragrima.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
Ooh, nice!
110