Peter Sagal @petersagal.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I’m not going to argue with people, but it does seem that some of you believe that good journalists write hard hitting stories which then go to mealy-mouthed collaborationist editors who write sanewashing headlines but somehow forget to edit the good stuff out of the stories. 171476
Peter Sagal @petersagal.bsky.social · 23/02/2025One reason I am so adamant in my defense of journalists and editors is I know a lot of journalists and editors. You should meet some, if you haven’t. 682738
Victor @victor128.bsky.social · 23/02/2025You people are utterly useless stenographs. I hate Trump with passion but he is right to humiliate you the way he does because you people have no dignity or responsibility for the constitution and the people whom you supposed to inform. Just fucking weasels. 000
Michael Witthaus @lyricstoliveby.bsky.social · 23/02/2025You and your cabal of access whores are getting exactly the ratio deserved for this milquetoast, too little too late defense of the indefensible. 060
srbratton.bsky.social @srbratton.bsky.social · 23/02/2025That’s nice, but those people should do their damn jobs. 030
dollyllama @dollyllama.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Nice people can produce shitty work. Just an FYI. You should see the damage bad journalism does to people you don't know. 0120
Tom Carter @thcarter123.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I met some. medium.com/p/8c3ab0dcea5emedium.comA decade of failing to persuade the New York Times to pay attention to Leonard LeoBy Tom Carter 161
Dr. E. Hughes Shanks @ehughesshanks.bsky.social · 24/02/2025Thankfully, I can see past the headlines (which in apps are literally bait) and I crave real journalism. 010
Potomac Ripper Inclusive @potomacripper.bsky.social · 23/02/2025You know what we call journalists and editors who defend these Nazi coup leaders and don’t call it what it out? Nazis? You know what we call people who won’t call out their Nazi journalist and editor friends? Nazis You are picking a side because they are your friends? Well that’s a choice. 000
Mi nombre es Teo @toddkbailey.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I know a lot of them. Did the work for years. But really that’s irrelevant. My personal feelings about them as people don’t alter my view of their work. But it sure seems like you judge them based on how you feel about them which is super. 020
Ash McGonigal @ashmcgonigal.com · 23/02/2025The reason I'm so harsh on NYT/WaPo/NPR politics propagandists is that I know a lot of good journalists and they're as horrified as I am. 170
AmGigOhm @americangigaohm.bsky.social · 23/02/2025It’s kind of like what they say about if there are 99 good cops and 1 bad cop- if the 99 do nothing about the 1, then you have 100 bad cops. 010
Mike Snow @lakeeffectsnow.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Well, hmmm, this is kind of the problem - there's so few of them working now, there's a near zero percent chance I personally ever will ever meet one in real life unless I start stalking. 000
ErinFromTheOffice @erinfromtheoffice.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Why have I never seen you defend the hundreds of Palestinian journalists Israel has systematically killed? 020
🍉 One-Eyed Wildcat @radicallynx.bsky.social · 23/02/2025You can understand that the good people you know are subject to pressures that make them do bad/harmful things in their jobs, and still criticize those bad things they're doing. "I know them, though!" Isn't the defense you think it is. 130
張永 @sea-monkey.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I used to be one. You suck and so does your desperately unfunny show 100
rocinatereturns.bsky.social @rocinatereturns.bsky.social · 23/02/2025That means you are ok legitimizing evil. Great defense 030
p-kai.bsky.social @p-kai.bsky.social · 23/02/2025NPR is one of the worst offenders when it comes to putting out bad political journalism. 000
Humperbert Engeldinck @rectagram.bsky.social · 23/02/2025The industry as a whole brought us here. There are individual exceptions/examples of great work along the way, but legacy media failed horrifically at the most critical juncture. There’s been no recognition of this by them or any attempt to fix it for the future. So fuck em. 070
Ryan Cordell @laststarfighter.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Have you considered you are just as bad as they are? 000
Jimmy G @leontrout.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Compared to 5 years ago, is the industry (especially the editor class) in a stronger or weaker position to critically and realistically meet this moment? 100
A TinyFavor.. PleaseCheckMyPage🙏 @muad-lib.bsky.social · 23/02/2025We won't report them as saying a lie, because we don't know what's in their heart and mind at the time. No, you only need to report on what's coming out of their mouths. 000
Shirley0401 @shirley0401.bsky.social · 23/02/2025"They're my friends" is a pretty weak argument, and I think it undermines your larger point. Good work is being done, but when the prioritization of "balance" and "neutrality" leads to false equivocation as the norm, it's natural for people to lose faith in these publications. 2651
Lich-Lord Heppner 👻 @rlheppner.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I’m sympathetic to your defense. And I do think the blanket criticism of journalists and editors can go too far. But I-know-them-personally isn’t a great argument. 030
Stretchdad vs the Dicktocracy @stretchdad.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Sample of one (i.e., me): Despite dumping my NYT and WaPo subscriptions, I continue to financially support journalism. I just spend my dollars on outlets that don't seem ethically compromised. 0100
sidc2024.bsky.social @sidc2024.bsky.social · 23/02/2025www.wbur.org/cognoscenti/...wbur.orgNo Time To Be Nice: Now Is Not The Moment To Remain SilentNaomi Shulman makes the post-election case for speaking out. 021
Rich Gardner @rlgardner190.bsky.social · 23/02/2025That's an EXTREMELY weak defense! Sit down, dude! 030
pre3chorded.bsky.social @pre3chorded.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Do you know why Washington Post and New York Times only take quotes from white Republican men? Is it Executive Order? bsky.app/profile/mile... 0110
pre3chorded.bsky.social @pre3chorded.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Do you know the editors and journalists at the NYT that tried to pass off a statement by the head of Houston Young Republicans as by a generic Everyman, then secretly edited article when they got caught on the fraud, no editors note? 1390
EssayWells @essaywells.bsky.social · 23/02/2025"My friends can't be doing a bad thing because they're my friends" is an argument a toddler would make. 011
Daisy Gardner @daisygardner.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I deeply appreciate journalists who are doing the work. Slightly different issue: I’m wondering how we can get their work in front of an American public that has moved over to social media to mainline current events. Smart careful reporting is getting lost in a maelstrom of propaganda. 251
Kristina @solakri.bsky.social · 23/02/2025When my friends are being shitty I tell them, because that’s what real friends do. These aren’t your real friends they’re your little friends. Didn’t your mother warn you about blindly following those types of « friends » while they’re acting stupid? 010
halcorley.bsky.social @halcorley.bsky.social · 23/02/2025We critique not their noble intentions but craven new practices and accommodation: the daily search through the traditional political lexicon to describe unprecedented horrors is palpable. A fear of being biased or merely hyperbolic has created anodyne characterizations of historic upheaval. 000
Just Another Weather Nerd @cyclogenesis.bsky.social · 23/02/2025How's the vacation going Peter :) 000
Robert Cruickshank @robertcruickshank.com · 23/02/2025A big part of the problem is that journalism does not appear to be policing itself. We receive these kind of exhortations to defend and support journalism. Yet we also saw journalists mislead about Trump in systematic ways, especially in 2024. I haven’t yet seen reflection or accountability on this. 2320
Thomas Janecek @twocatfarm1.bsky.social · 23/02/2025Well, Peter, I’ve read a lot from corporate journalists & have seen the editing, headline writing, & topic selection by many corporate editors. By and large, both have little historical knowledge, both-sides to a ridiculous degree, & have very little experience on how to follow up on blatant lies. 030
V for Vampire! Blah! BLAH! 🇬🇱🇨🇦🇵🇷🇲🇽🇵🇦 @vacca.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I *am* an editor, though not from the journalistic world, and the NYT and WaPo routinely publish material I would red-pencil into oblivion. (I find their heavy but selective use of passive voice particularly galling, as it is clearly deployed to protect favored entities from consequences.) 0172
Art Martin @gartmartin9.bsky.social · 23/02/2025thanks for your contempt for your customers (listeners/readers). we are not morons. journalism. not that complicated. NYT et al are failing the moment. how about some self reflection? please defend this NYT story normalizing Trump seeking reparations from the victim? www.nytimes.com/2025/02/22/w...nytimes.comU.S. Pressing Tough Demands in Revised Deal for Ukraine’s MineralsThe Trump administration wants revenues from Ukraine’s natural resources, according to a draft obtained by The New York Times, with no security guarantee in exchange. 060
cowboyinbrla.bsky.social @cowboyinbrla.bsky.social · 23/02/2025All true, and yet, those headlines still keep making it out there - how? Someone is making the decision to slap misleading headlines on these stories, undoubtedly also knowing that many "ordinary" people skim the headlines and will never reach the meat of the story. 110
Mannwich @mannwich.bsky.social · 23/02/2025So if they do a shitty job, nobody can criticize them? That’s life in the fast lane. Be a real journalist and this won’t happen. All we ask. 030
Micheline Maynard @mickimaynard.bsky.social · 23/02/2025The NYT, where I used to work and still contribute, laid off 100 copy editors a few years ago. The enterprise has not been the same since. Copy editors would push back against editors. They would make us fact check. We were on our toes. The public doesn’t know this but anyone who worked there does. 0255
Joshua Engel, Esq. @joshuaaengel.com · 23/02/2025I work with many journalists in my legal job, and two seemingly contradictory things are true: 1) they are willing to openly acknowledge errors in reporting; 2) they rarely engage in self-analysis about why errors were made or take steps to assure that the errors don’t repeat 071
Alexis @alexis8.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I know the best former editors. They are right here on Bluesky. They are not afraid to criticize journalism malpractice. Those at @nytimes.com and @washingtonpost.com got us here! 1111
Paul Czarnecki @peczar.bsky.social · 23/02/2025And you get to yuck it up for money every week while we deal with fascism. Spare me. 020
Pjeanne97 @pjeanne97.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I have. I have been one. There are many good ones. There are also many willing to repeat lies without calling them out and to frame stories in a way that doesn’t communicate the reality of what Trump’s going. 030
Travis McGee @procrastin.bsky.social · 23/02/2025You should be gifting these pieces, most of the readers who you need to reach have dropped subscriptions. BTW, headlines are powerful and until the NYT editors stop sanewashing the pieces with the headline we won't be back. 000
So it goes @jimbolint.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I'm glad you have friends Peter. I have friends who are conservative Republicans, I criticize them and I'll criticize your friends when they deserve it. 020
Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) @antonpnym.bsky.social · 23/02/2025One reason I am so adamant in my rejection of your defense is that IMO a large part of the decline of journalism today results from journalists not calling out bad journalism. Democracy is dying of excessive professional courtesy. 2634
Colin King @colinhking.bsky.social · 23/02/2025I find journalists are making adequate efforts of their own to protect their jobs, widen impacts be damned. No need for me to hold my nose and support their corrupt owners who are working against MY best interest. 000