Sign in

Valentin Mang

@valentinmang.bsky.social
262 followers 295 following 49 posts

Postdoc @ESRI.ie | social psych/behavioural science, misinformation, conspiracy beliefs (he/him) #firstgen

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Data Colada @datacolada.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
An influential paper by Ariely & Wertenbroch (2002) reported two studies with tampered data. Post 1 of 2. datacolada.org/138
datacolada.org
[138] Artificial Deadlines (Part 1): Evidence of Fraud in an Influential Study About Procrastination
A new paper in Psychological Science (.htm) reports a failure to replicate Study 2 of Ariely and Wertenbroch’s influential article entitled, “Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Contr…
723799
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 27/08/2026
Psychological Science special issue call 📣 Ever had your research denigrated bc it's "only descriptive", "what's the mechanism though?" and "but what are the theoretical implications?" Now has come your time to shine. Send your best descriptive work! www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
Psychological Science invites submissions that advance psychological science through careful description of psychological phenomena. Psychological research often focuses on explaining and predicting phenomena before we have a sufficiently detailed understanding of them. It can be difficult to build strong theories on incomplete empirical foundations of the phenomena themselves. Careful descriptive research helps establish shared empirical reference points developed around well-characterized phenomena. As such, descriptive research contributes to psychological science both by improving our understanding of the phenomena themselves and by providing a stronger foundation for future theory-building, explanation, and prediction.

We are interested in manuscripts that:

Deepen our understanding of psychological phenomena, including what they look like, how they vary, and how they unfold;
Draw on a variety of sources of evidence and methods, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches; research conducted in naturalistic settings; intensive, longitudinal, or small-sample designs; and open or large-scale datasets; 
Provide necessary context for interpreting what is being described, including who is represented in the data, the settings and circumstances in which phenomena occur, and the broader social contexts in which they are situated; and/or
Make a substantive contribution to psychological science through the quality, depth, or significance of the description provided.
The deadline for submitting regular manuscripts is April 15, 2027. Registered Reports will also be considered. The deadline for submitting Stage 1 Registered Reports is November 15, 2026. Authors should indicate in the “Comments to Editor” box during submission that the manuscript is intended for the “Descriptive Research in Psychological Science” special issue.
7244128
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Kai Kupferschmidt @kakape.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
“Russian propaganda on Bluesky first became notable during Germany’s elections last year, when the Kremlin sought to bolster Germany’s far right, led by the Alternative for Germany party, known as AfD.” #giftlink #disinformation #propaganda
nytimes.com
Bluesky Says Kremlin Is Hacking Its Platform to Spread Propaganda
612264
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Sacha Altay @sachaltay.bsky.social · 07/04/2026
One of my favorites paper got published 🤓 It covers a lot of ground and it’s the best summary of my views on misinformation and what to do about it. Give it a read :) 🔓 osf.io/preprints/ps... 👉 doi.org/10.1177/1461...
212945
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 19/03/2026
How can counterfactual thinking help tackle conspiracy theories? The short (~3 minute) answer is in our @spspnews.bsky.social blog post (with @kwinter.bsky.social, @kaiepstude.bsky.social, and Bob Fennis): spsp.org/news/charact... 1/2
spsp.org
How “What If” Thinking Can Reduce Engagement with Conspiracy Theories | SPSP
Considering how things could have gone differently may reduce engagement with conspiracy theories.
253
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Andrey Chetverikov @achetverikov.bsky.social · 04/03/2026
Recently, van der Stigchel and colleagues posted a provocative commentary suggesting that we should be wary of bots in online behavioral data collection (🧵by @cstrauch.bsky.social here: bsky.app/profile/cstr...). But should we? Here is my response letter osf.io/preprints/ps.... 1/5
65533
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Kai Epstude @kaiepstude.bsky.social · 03/03/2026
We're looking for a PhD student working on the (mis)perception of social norms in social networks (in collaboration with Vincent Buskens at Utrecht University). Deadline: April 1, 2026. More information here: socion-program.org/vacancy/phd-...
socion-program.org
PhD position-The (Mis)Perception of Social Norms in Dynamic Social Networks - SOCION
098
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Mary Elizabeth Sutherland @meharpist.bsky.social · 01/03/2026
Check out this recent @nature.com paper reporting a field experiment on X. It shows X's algorithm boosts conservative content and downranks traditional media—shifting users’ views on key issues. Switching to chronological doesn’t reverse the effect. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
The political effects of X’s feed algorithm - Nature
Among users initially on a chronological feed, 7 weeks of exposure to X’s algorithmic feed in 2023 shifted political attitudes and account-following behaviour in a more conservative direction compared...
511853
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Society for Personality and Social Psychology @spspnews.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
What do laypeople think causes conspiracy beliefs? New research suggests that people tend to attribute these beliefs most strongly to influence from social media and misinformation. Read more in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin: ow.ly/HSrZ50YioS5
172
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Sander van der Linden @profsanderlinden.bsky.social · 25/02/2026
Despite all the chatter, social media bans for teens lack evidence! New paper out in Nature Health. (1) Harms from social media are real & serious. (2) We need regulatory action but bans are not nuanced, do not empower youth, & are not supported by evidence. www.nature.com/articles/s44...
18140
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
What do laypeople think causes conspiracy beliefs? We (@kaiepstude.bsky.social, Bob Fennis, and I) look at this and other questions in a new PSPB paper combining six correlational studies and a qualitative one. Read the open-access paper here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... A 🧵 1/5
164
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
If you are interested in our recent paper on how counterfactual thinking can reduce engagement with conspiracy theories but don't have the time to read it; here is a short summary of our main findings: www.psychreg.org/thinking-wha...
psychreg.org
Thinking About “What Might Have Been” Linked to Lower Conspiracy Engagement, Study Finds
Imagining negative consequences of conspiracy beliefs reduced time spent engaging with conspiracy content without changing beliefs.
000
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Michael Clemens @mclem.org · 06/01/2026
A new paper by George Borjas—who served this past year in the Trump White House designing some of its anti-immigration policies—claims to display evidence of ideological bias among researchers who study immigration. doi.org/10.1126/scia... 🧵 Thread—>
429199
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Kai Epstude @kaiepstude.bsky.social · 26/12/2025
Are leaders blamed for disasters that eventually did not occur? The answer points to the crucial impact of partisanship in assigning blame for events that almost happened. @jexpsocpsych.bsky.social w/ Matejas Mackin, @danieleffron.bsky.social, and Neal Roese authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S...
authors.elsevier.com
ScienceDirect.com | Science, health and medical journals, full text articles and books.
052
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Fabian Hutmacher @fabianhutmacher.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
Motivated reasoning is a well-understood phenomenon - or is it? In a new paper just published at @collabrapsychology.bsky.social we discuss three known unknowns. doi.org/10.1525/coll... Here is a 🧵
doi.org
Known Unknowns in Motivated Reasoning: A Closer Look at Three Open Questions
Motivated reasoning denotes the phenomenon that individuals are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at. Properly understanding this phenomenon requires at least three things:...
13617
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Saloni @scientificdiscovery.dev · 09/12/2025
Big new blogpost! My guide to data visualization, which includes a very long table of contents, tons of charts, and more. --> Why data visualization matters and how to make charts more effective, clear, transparent, and sometimes, beautiful. www.scientificdiscovery.dev/p/salonis-gu...
screenshot of my post
28806313
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 27/11/2025
New paper out in @jexpsocpsych.bsky.social ! We (@kwinter.bsky.social, @kaiepstude.bsky.social , Bob Fennis and I) found that encouraging counterfactual thinking reduces engagement with conspiracy theories (i.e., clicks on, and reading times for, conspiracy articles). A 🧵 1/n
Screenshot of the abstract for the article "If only I had not fallen down the rabbit hole: Counterfactual thinking reduces engagement with conspiracy theories" in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
13615
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Kai Sassenberg @kaisassenberg.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
At ZPID we are searching for a tenure track assistant professor for Psychological Metascience in joint appointment with @unitrier.bsky.social preferably someone who has conducted quantitative research in metascience in psychology or related disciplines. Questions? Feel free to contact me personally.
01718
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 24/10/2025
1. We ( @jbakcoleman.bsky.social, @cailinmeister.bsky.social, @jevinwest.bsky.social, and I) have a new preprint up on the arXiv. There we explore how social media companies and other online information technology firms are able to manipulate scientific research about the effects of their products.
Three schematic diagrams. The first illustrates selective publishing of internal resection, the second selective causal focus, and the third selective access and funding for researchers.
16755357
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Kai Epstude @kaiepstude.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
The deadline for the meeting on counterfactuals is coming up. Don't forget to send in your contribution.
026
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Matthew Facciani @matthewfacciani.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
“Bypassing” is a promising strategy for countering misinformation by sharing truthful, positively framed statements instead of direct corrections. New research shows it can correct misperceptions effectively, especially when people are still open to learning. www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/misg...
psychologytoday.com
Is There a Better Way to Fight Misinformation?
What if the best way to counter misinformation isn’t arguing facts, but offering better truths instead?
911746
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Fil Menczer @fil.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
Killing both academic research and government watchdogs protecting us from foreign manipulation campaigns apnews.com/article/rubi...
apnews.com
The State Department closes the office that flags disinformation from Russia, China and Iran
The State Department has shut down the office that sought to deal with misinformation and disinformation that Russia, China and Iran have been accused of spreading.
16130
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 19/04/2025
I got an email yesterday afternoon that my NSF SPRF Postdoctoral Fellowship was terminated. My grant focused on testing interventions to address online misinformation and I was 8 months into a two year appointment.
701038460
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Michael Bang Petersen @m-b-petersen.bsky.social · 18/04/2025
This statement from the NSF is insane. Science is, in essence, designed to separate the true from the false. Understanding how falsehoods spread is key to the scientific endeavor. It is not a violation of free speech to be proven wrong.
972621990
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Advances.in @advances.in · 19/02/2025
Call for papers: “The Psychology of Pushback: Understanding Resistance and Compliance During Democratic Decline.” Edited by Jonas R. Kunst and John F. Dovidio. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Special Issue on "The Psychology of Pushback"
We are currently accepting submissions for a special issue on "The Psychology of Pushback: Understanding Resistance and Compliance During Democratic Decline."
01211
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 12/02/2025
🚨New paper alert🚨 How do different "Great Replacement" conspiracy narratives (blaming relatively powerful left-wing elites or relatively powerless Muslim communities) affect radical collective action intentions against different targets across the political spectrum? A 🧵 about what we found:
183
Reposted by Valentin Mang
M R. X. Dentith @mrxdentith.com · 24/11/2024
I’ve created a starter pack of scholars who study conspiracy theories academically. If I’ve missed anyone off of the list, let me know (indeed, tag yourself) go.bsky.app/PZPcxeL
6224
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Marlene Altenmüller @marlephie.bsky.social · 23/01/2025
Since we’re talking about trust in science right now (shout out to the TISP project!), here’s the updated „Trust in Science Scholars“ starter pack once more! Please share and reach out if you identify as a trust in science researcher and want to be added! #trustinscience #scicomm
53312
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Sander van der Linden @profsanderlinden.bsky.social · 26/01/2025
The spread of misinformation and disinformation top the WEF short-term global risk report for 2025. www.weforum.org/publications...
711158
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 07/01/2025
Great to see this paper being accepted! @hakancakmak.bsky.social and @feitenglong.bsky.social made working on this project a pleasure! If you are interested in how different Great Replacement conspiracy narratives shape hostility against Muslims and political elites, DM one of us for the preprint.
030
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
If you're interested in research on misinformation and conspiracy beliefs, I can highly recommend checking out this special issue!
063
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 07/10/2024
New paper alert! In this new publication in advances.in/psychology, I systematically reviewed the literature on source credibility effects in misinformation research together with my supervisors Bob Fennis and @kaiepstude.bsky.social. A short summary of the highlights of the paper:
283
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Hakan Çakmak @hakancakmak.bsky.social · 19/06/2024
My first PhD work is now out in PSPB! In brief: Prior work found that highly identified transgressor group members may act in solidarity with victims due to ingroup image concerns. Partially replicating this, we showed that justice concerns may motivate low-identifiers.
141
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Hakan Çakmak @hakancakmak.bsky.social · 18/06/2024
Chuffed to see that our research proposal with @valentinmang.bsky.social & @feitenglong.bsky.social received in-principle acceptance as a Stage 1 registered report from BJSP. Stay tuned for Çakmak, Mang & Long (possibly 2025).
021
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Kai Epstude @kaiepstude.bsky.social · 06/06/2024
We're looking for a future PhD student at the University of Groningen for a project focusing on the intersection between social and consumer psychology. The main focus is on processes that motivate individuals to buy sustainable products: www.rug.nl/about-ug/wor... (deadline: June 26, 2024)
055
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 25/11/2023
Happy to announce that a part of my PhD research has just been published! Together with my supervisors, Bob Fennis and @kaiepstude.bsky.social, we examined how the need to evaluate shapes the effects of exposure to conspiracy theories on behavioural intentions authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S...
authors.elsevier.com
ScienceDirect.com | Science, health and medical journals, full text articles and books.
2134
Reposted by Valentin Mang
Bojana Većkalov @bojanaveckalov.bsky.social · 19/10/2023
Analytic thinking is related to lower belief in conspiracies. So can analytic thinking decrease belief in conspiracy theories? We don’t really know, as the one set of studies in support of this does not seem to replicate. With @marijapetrovic.bsky.social, @vukasin.bsky.social #socialpsyc #PsychSci
sciencedirect.com
No evidence that priming analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories: A Registered Repor...
Analytic thinking is reliably associated with lower belief in conspiracy theories. However, evidence for whether increasing analytic thinking can redu…
1249