Sign in

Advances.in

@advances.in
115 followers 18 following 76 posts

The academic publisher that pays editors and reviewers for their work. advances.in

PostsRepliesMedia
Advances.in @advances.in · 28/09/2026
Ideologies aren't just belief salads—they're structured systems. New commentary in advances.in/psychology shows how sacred cores & flexible peripheries explain radicalization. doi.org/10.56296/aip00070 #OpenAccess
advances.in
Sacred-symbolic cores and shifting peripheries: A structural account of ideological change in extremism
Beyond the 'salad bar' metaphor: how a structural account of sacred cores and mutable peripheries explains ideological shift in violent extremism.
011
Advances.in @advances.in · 19/08/2026
Challenging extremism research: advances.in/psychology study shows radicalization isn't linear passion→engagement→violence. Instead, obsessive passion & deliberate engagement reciprocally reinforce each other in a "syndrome." doi.org/10.56296/aip00067 🔗
advances.in
The radicalization syndrome: Reciprocal dynamics of obsessive passion and deliberate engagement
Why do few who see radical content support violence? A multi-study analysis pinpoints obsessive passion and active engagement as the key coupling.
021
Advances.in @advances.in · 07/08/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: childhood trauma linked to violent extremism. A scoping review of 23 studies (4,946 people) finds those engaged in extremism report more adverse childhood experiences than the general population. 📊 doi.org/10.56296/aip00065
advances.in
Adverse childhood experiences and violent extremism: A scoping review of the literature
A scoping review of 23 studies finds violent extremists show higher rates of adverse childhood experiences than the general population. Explore the evidence.
021
Advances.in @advances.in · 03/08/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: How do violent extremist leaders become deadlier? A multilevel analysis reveals that charismatic + personalized power = far deadlier organizations—but pragmatic leaders show the opposite pattern. doi.org/10.56296/aip00069
advances.in
Deadly persuasion: A multilevel analysis of leader influence tactics and lethality in violent extremist organizations
How does a leader's tenure change an extremist group's lethality? A longitudinal analysis of 645 leader-years uncovers surprising interaction effects.
021
Advances.in @advances.in · 21/07/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: How do changeover delays shape choice? Pigeons showed stronger preference for rewarded options when delays organized their responding into distinct chunks—suggesting behavior structure drives preference. doi.org/10.56296/aip00058
advances.in
When a stay is a switch: Discriminative control of response chunks determines preference during concurrent VI VI schedules
New pigeon study reveals how changeover delays chunk behavior into bursts, reshaping preference on concurrent VI VI reinforcement schedules.
000
Advances.in @advances.in · 20/07/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: Extremism isn't fragmenting—it's a developmental journey. Rousseau and Veissière argue that young people move fluidly across ideologies, often seeking meaning rather than coherent political goals. doi.org/10.56296/aip00068 #Psychology
advances.in
Shifts and continuity in contemporary violent extremism: Moving toward a dynamic and developmental understanding?
Why is violent extremism fragmenting? A developmental look at youth radicalization, hybrid grievances, and nihilistic violence beyond static categories.
021
Advances.in @advances.in · 17/07/2026
When violence has no clear ideology, what do terrorism scholars do? Clark McCauley offers a fresh framework—focus on how ideas actually drive radicalization, not ideology alone. doi.org/10.56296/aip00066 ✓
advances.in
The end of ideological violence
Are lone-wolf attackers really driven by ideology? A new commentary challenges how we define terrorism—and proposes a bold alternative.
000
Advances.in @advances.in · 14/07/2026
When teens lose faith in politics, radicalism follows. New 5-year study in advances.in/psychology shows political distrust & powerlessness predict radical behavior. doi.org/10.56296/aip00061 🔍
advances.in
System-disillusioned youth radicalize: The role of political alienation in the formation of political radicalism
Can feeling powerless make teens radical? A 5-year study of Swedish youth reveals how political distrust and alienation drive adolescent radicalism—especially in boys.
131
Advances.in @advances.in · 09/07/2026
🔍 New commentary in advances.in/psychology: Modern extremism often isn't ideological—some extremists are fixated on violence itself, not political goals. Cassam challenges how we understand radicalization. doi.org/10.56296/aip00062
advances.in
Extremism without ideology
Can you be an extremist with no ideology at all? A provocative new analysis uses the Southport killer to challenge everything we assume about extremism.
021
Advances.in @advances.in · 08/07/2026
Hybrid extremism is real & intensifying, argues new advances.in/psychology paper. Baele defends the 'salad bar' concept against critics—showing how societal shifts produce composite ideological worldviews. doi.org/10.56296/aip00060
advances.in
Why the ‘salad bar’ might actually help extremism research – A reply to Horgan and Shayler
Is 'salad bar' extremism real or just hype? A new analysis reveals why hybrid, incoherent ideologies are surging—and what the data actually show.
011
Advances.in @advances.in · 06/07/2026
We're sharing Arie Perliger's sharp critique of how the political violence research field diagnoses ideological "incoherence"—often missing deeper worldviews. A call for rigorous historical & comparative analysis. doi.org/10.56296/aip00059
advances.in
The erosion of conceptual clarity in the study of political violence
Are extremists really ideologically incoherent? A sharp critique of the 'salad bar of ideologies' and the erosion of clarity in political violence research.
011
Advances.in @advances.in · 16/06/2026
Does 'salad bar extremism' capture what's really happening? A new study in advances.in/psychology says no—and offers better conceptual tools for understanding violent extremism today. doi.org/10.56296/aip00057
advances.in
Why the ‘salad bar of ideologies’ does not help us understand contemporary violent extremism
Is 'salad bar' extremism really new? Experts unpack the FBI's viral analogy, the explosion of competing labels, and what mixed ideologies actually mean.
000
Reposted by Advances.in
Jonas R. Kunst @kunstjonas.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Over the past eight years, LGBTQ+ communities have demonstrated remarkable resilience. While the perceived possibility of progressive change has steadily decreased, the strength of their social identity has only continued to grow.
042
Advances.in @advances.in · 12/05/2026
New article! How do minority groups cope when social progress stalls or reverses? A new study tracks 3627 sexual minority participants from 2017 to 2025, showing that as pessimism about progressive social change grows, individuals lean into their collective identity. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
When it doesn’t get better: Leaning into minoritized identity to brace for decline
When progress stalls, LGBTQ+ identity strengthens: new 8-year study shows ‘leaning in’ not out amid democratic decline. See what drives vigilance & resilience.
020
Advances.in @advances.in · 09/04/2026
New article! Why do some societies resist democratic backsliding while others remain indifferent or actively support it? Neil Lavie-Driver and @profsanderlinden.bsky.social extend the social identity model of collective action to explore the role of collective memory. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Weaponising the past: An extended SIMCA model for how social identity and collective memory shape variation in collective action responses to democratic backsliding - advances.in/psychology
Explore a SIMCA-based framework on how identity and collective memory drive resistance or acquiescence to democratic backsliding in Russia, Israel, and the U.S.
174
Advances.in @advances.in · 08/04/2026
New article! How do citizens in authoritarian contexts morally construe state actions? @vponizovskiy.bsky.social, @miweissflog.bsky.social, Evgeny Osin, and @grigolus.bsky.social explore how Russians view the war in Ukraine through core values. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
War, what is it good for? Propaganda, value-instantiating beliefs, war support and resistance in Russia
How propaganda shapes moral meaning: Russian war study uncovers two value profiles that predict support or resistance—beyond ideology. See what truly matters.
040
Advances.in @advances.in · 02/02/2026
Publication Alert: Deconstructing the "Secure" Narrative of U.S. Democracy Many believe that recent authoritarian rhetoric in the United States is a sudden departure from a historically secure democracy. But has it ever been as stable as we think? advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Race, memory, and colorblindness: Critical history and deconstructing United States democracy
How colorblind history fuels authoritarianism—and how critical racial memory can build a stronger, more equitable democracy.
012
Advances.in @advances.in · 14/01/2026
📰 New Research: The Politics of Well-Being during Democratic Backsliding @djwu.bsky.social ky.social, @kyleflaw.com, @stysyropoulos.bsky.social y.social, and @sylviapperry.bsky.social show striking partisan differences in well-being during Trump’s second term. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
The politics of well-being during democratic backsliding: How partisan affiliation and support for government actions relate to happiness and life satisfaction
Do politics shape happiness? Evidence from 5-week tracking links policy support to well-being amid democratic backsliding in the U.S.
174
Advances.in @advances.in · 13/01/2026
Are you a Champion, a Bystander, or a Reluctant? Why D&I support isn’t just "For" or "Against." We are excited to publish "Voices behind walking the talk: Quantified qualitative insights on D&I policy support reasoning" in the latest issue of advances.in/psychology. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Voices behind walking the talk: Quantified qualitative insights on D&I policy support reasoning
Champions and Bystanders: data-driven profiles explain D&I uptake. Learn the motives behind support, the role of managers, and how to turn intent into action.
011
Advances.in @advances.in · 12/01/2026
📢 Publication Alert: Do violent counter-protests silence movements or amplify them? We are excited to publish "Understanding public responses to counter-protests disrupting social change movements" in advances.in/psychology. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Understanding public responses to counter-protests disrupting social change movements
Violent counter-protests often backfire: five studies show free-speech concerns boost sympathy for social change movements across Hong Kong, Thailand, the U.S., and Australia.
131
Advances.in @advances.in · 07/01/2026
New in advances.in/psychology: Did the 2024 election break political solidarity? 🗳️💔 A new study explores "stigma-based solidarity betrayal." Black women felt betrayed by Latino men (solidarity violation), White women felt betrayed by White men (relational violation). advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Stigma-based solidarity betrayal: Implications for resistance to the rise of ethno-nationalism in the U.S.
Betrayal in intergroup alliances: New evidence from 2024 U.S. election shows when solidarity breaks—and why it matters for trust and coalition building.
112
Advances.in @advances.in · 06/01/2026
📄 New Article in advances.in/psychology: "White Americans' feelings of being 'last place' are associated with anti-DEI attitudes, Trump support, and Trump vote during the 2024 U.S. presidential election." advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
White Americans’ feelings of being “last place” are associated with anti-DEI attitudes, Trump support, and Trump vote during the 2024 U.S. presidential election
White Americans who feel in “last place” drove the highest support for alt-right ideology, DEI bans, and Trump in 2024—evidence from a five-wave U.S. study.
010
Advances.in @advances.in · 05/01/2026
Just Published: Does shared discrimination mobilize voters of color? New insights on the 2024 Election. 🗳️ advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Solidarity as a bridge: Shared discrimination is indirectly associated with voting intentions among People of Color
Can shared discrimination appeals move votes? New experiments show PoC solidarity rises and can boost support for PoC-aligned candidates. See who moved—and why.
020
Advances.in @advances.in · 02/01/2026
The Hidden Cost of Activism: When Political Engagement Hinders Trust We know winning makes voters trust the system more. But what happens to the people who pour their heart and soul into a losing campaign? Read more in advances.in/psychology. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Collective action hinders the increase in post-election trust among election losers: Longitudinal evidence from the 2024 UK election
Does activism hurt political trust? New 2024 UK election study shows collective action hinders trust recovery for election losers. Read the full analysis.
050
Advances.in @advances.in · 11/12/2025
"One of the gravest misconceptions in the field is the assumption that measuring individuals over multiple time points is equivalent to adopting a developmental perspective." Read this poignant response to Berry (2025) by Philipp Jugert and Peter Titzmann. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Why longitudinal is not developmental: Clarifying misconceptions in acculturation research – A response to Berry (2025)
Uncover why standard stage models fall short for acculturation and how concepts like acculturation tempo reconfigure research on cultural adaptation.
131
Advances.in @advances.in · 12/11/2025
📢 The acculturation debate continues: A Direct Response to John Berry's critique was just published in advances.in/psychology! @kbierwiaczonek.bsky.social addresses recent criticisms and reveals crucial, overlooked findings from meta-analytical evidence. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Unpacking the Integration Puzzle: Overlooked Insights from Meta-Analytical Research. A Response to Berry (2025)
Bierwiaczonek responds to Berry's (2025) criticism. Evidence indicates mainstream orientation, not integration, drives adaptation.
074
Reposted by Advances.in
Olaf Borghi @olafborghi.com · 10/10/2025
Huge thanks also to the team at @advances.in: The feedback from the editors, peer-reviewers, and production team was beyond exceptional! Bonus, peer-reviewers get paid for their work, which they more than deserve for the helpful feedback we received!!
advances.in
131
Advances.in @advances.in · 10/10/2025
🧠🌍 New in advances.in/psychology! How does anxiety about the future shape young people’s politics? A UK–Greece study finds that future anxiety links to stronger democratic support — but among young men, it’s also tied to more right-conservative views. Full article: advances.in/psychology/1...
031
Advances.in @advances.in · 03/09/2025
📢 New commentary by John W. Berry! In our special issue Acculturation Reimagined, Berry reflects on 6 key articles and outlines a bold agenda for future research. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Comments on the papers in the Special Issue “Acculturation reimagined: Setting the stage for the next era of inquiry”
Insights on future acculturation research directions, cultural integration processes, and adaptation outcomes in intercultural contact contexts.
020
Advances.in @advances.in · 29/08/2025
Forgive and forget… if it’s your party? A new article in advances.in/psychology reveals how partisan loyalty shaped forgiveness of political leaders in the 2024 UK General Election. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Partisan forgiveness of political leadership in the 2024 UK general election: Are there limits to transgression credit?
A study of the UK election finds voters grant ‘transgression credit,’ showing more willingness to forgive their own leaders' failings than opponents'.
011
Advances.in @advances.in · 21/08/2025
🚨Publication Alert: Can emotional acculturation, usually seen as beneficial, have hidden costs? Immigrant minority students who internalize majority emotional norms report more social contact but less school engagement—especially when facing discrimination. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
The paradoxical effect of emotional acculturation in discriminatory contexts: School adjustment of immigrant minority youth
Emotional acculturation impacts school engagement and social contact in immigrant youth, with discrimination influencing these effects over time.
011
Advances.in @advances.in · 08/07/2025
✨New in advances.in/psychology: Vu & Bierwiaczonek show that common bivariate “shortcuts” in meta-analyses overestimate interaction effects in the Integration Hypothesis by a lot. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Comparing bivariate and multivariate approaches to testing individual-level interaction effects in meta-analyses: The case of the integration hypothesis
Bivariate vs. multivariate tests of interaction in meta-analyses of the integration hypothesis in acculturation research reveal inflated prior results.
010
Advances.in @advances.in · 18/06/2025
🚨 Just published in advances.in/psychology: “Cross-lagged panel networks” combine network theory and SEM to track dynamic, item-level effects across constructs like self-esteem and school commitment. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Cross-lagged panel networks
Cross-lagged panel network analysis uncovers longitudinal item-level links between self-esteem and school commitment using regularized regression SEM.
084
Advances.in @advances.in · 10/06/2025
📢 New in advances .in/psychology: How do mobile phones, social media & digital diasporas shape modern migration experiences? Explore emerging research on digitally mediated acculturation by Jaimee Stuart, Colleen Ward, @jkarl.bsky.social, and Ronald Musizvingoza. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Intercultural contact in the digital age: A review of emerging research on digitally mediated acculturation
Explores how digital tech shapes migrants' acculturation via mobile phones, social media, and digital diaspora interactions.
041
Advances.in @advances.in · 29/05/2025
📢 New in advances.in/psychology: Who gets to say, “This country is ours”? This research unpacks territorial vs. epistemic ownership of a nation—comparing majority Finns & second-gen immigrants. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
“(The story of) This country is ours!” The territorial and epistemic dimensions of collective psychological ownership among the national majority and immigrants
Study reveals how territorial and epistemic ownership shape national belonging among majority and second-gen minority members.
021
Advances.in @advances.in · 10/05/2025
🚨Publication alert!🚨 "Re-imagining multiculturalism: Small steps towards indigenizing acculturation science" by Colleen Ward, Tia Neha & Tyler Ritchie. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Re-imagining multiculturalism: Small steps towards indigenizing acculturation science
Explore Indigenous Māori perspectives on multiculturalism, rethinking acculturation science through a braided, post-colonial research framework.
010
Advances.in @advances.in · 05/03/2025
Recognizing the financial pressures many academics experience in these trying times, we have waived the Article Processing Charge for this special issue. Kindly repost.
032
Advances.in @advances.in · 19/02/2025
Call for papers: “The Psychology of Pushback: Understanding Resistance and Compliance During Democratic Decline.” Edited by Jonas R. Kunst and John F. Dovidio. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Special Issue on "The Psychology of Pushback"
We are currently accepting submissions for a special issue on "The Psychology of Pushback: Understanding Resistance and Compliance During Democratic Decline."
01211
Reposted by Advances.in
Sven Nico E. Eger @svenep.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
Why do some reject science on vaccines or climate change? It's often about what they consider trustworthy. Tailored approaches—teaching what makes info credible (like peer review) & framing facts to align with values—can bridge the gap. Let’s educate, not alienate.
031
Reposted by Advances.in
Andrey Chetverikov @achetverikov.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
Just read about this journal started by a colleague from Oslo (@kunstjonas.bsky.social). They pay reviewers - seems like an interesting model, definitely better than the traditional one. 100$ for a peer-review (one or more rounds) is not much, but can add a bit of motivation.
152
Reposted by Advances.in
Valentin Mang @valentinmang.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
If you're interested in research on misinformation and conspiracy beliefs, I can highly recommend checking out this special issue!
063
Reposted by Advances.in
Philipp Schmid @philippschmid.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
It was great contributing to this together with the amazing Carolin Ziemer & friends: Ziemer et al. (2024) conducted a preregistered experimental study examining the susceptibility to pro-Russian disinformation about the war in Ukraine among Germans with and without a Russian migration background.
022
Advances.in @advances.in · 09/12/2024
🌟We are thrilled to announce the publication of our Special Issue: From Vulnerability to Vigilance. This issue brings together 11 impactful articles on psychological resilience against misinformation and conspiracy beliefs. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Vulnerability to vigilance – Cultivating psychological resilience against misinformation and conspiracy beliefs: Introduction to the special issue
Explore psychological resilience against misinformation and conspiracy beliefs with insights on interventions, mechanisms, and methodological advances.
32418
Advances.in @advances.in · 06/12/2024
Why do debates in misinformation research persist? Methodology matters! A new study in advances.in/psychology reanalyzes 143,956 data points, shedding light on how conscientiousness and ideology shape fake news sharing. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Resolving conflicting findings in misinformation research: A methodological perspective
Explore how methodological choices shape conflicting findings in misinformation and fake news research.
011
Advances.in @advances.in · 05/12/2024
New in advances.in/psychology: “The neglected role of social comparisons in acculturation” by Maykel Verkuyten This article discusses how considering social comparison processes can advance acculturation theory and research. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
The neglected role of social comparisons in acculturation: Considering the integration paradox
Explore the overlooked role of social comparisons in acculturation, addressing the integration paradox, discrimination, and intercultural adaptation.
010
Advances.in @advances.in · 22/11/2024
📈How does acculturation unfold across life stages? A new review published in advances.in/psychology introduces developmental science concepts to transform static acculturation research into a dynamic exploration of cultural change. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
The dynamics of acculturative change: The potential of a developmental perspective in acculturation science
Explore a developmental science approach to acculturation, revealing dynamic, stage-sensitive changes in cultural adaptation, especially for immigrant youth.
051
Advances.in @advances.in · 15/11/2024
📢 Just published in advances.in/psychology: "True discernment or blind scepticism? Comparing the effectiveness of four conspiracy belief interventions" By Cian O'Mahony, Gillian Murphy & Conor Linehan. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
True discernment or blind scepticism? Comparing the effectiveness of four conspiracy belief interventions - advances.in/psychology
Study compares four interventions (Priming, Inoculation, Active Inoculation, Discernment) in reducing conspiracy beliefs.
021
Advances.in @advances.in · 09/10/2024
🚨New in advances .in/psychology: Robson et al. explore reasoning behind misinformation beliefs. Quantitative analysis reveals key differences in how believers & non-believers evaluate evidence. Important insights for combating false claims. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Lazy or different? A quantitative content analysis of how believers and nonbelievers of misinformation reason - advances.in/psychology
Quantitative analysis reveals key differences in reasoning between believers and nonbelievers of misinformation and conspiracy theories.
132
Advances.in @advances.in · 07/10/2024
🔊New in advances.in/psychology: "Source credibility effects in misinformation research: A review and primer" by Mang, Fennis, & Epstude This systematic review unravels the complex role of source credibility in misinformation contexts. advances.in/psychology/1...
advances.in
Source credibility effects in misinformation research: A review and primer
Explore the role of source credibility in misinformation research. This review uncovers factors causing inconsistent findings and suggests future directions.
142
Reposted by Advances.in
Gordon Hodson @gordonhodsonphd.bsky.social · 30/09/2024
Meta-analysis by @shaunambowes.bsky.social & @lkfazio.bsky.social in @advances.in Finds negative relation between intellectual humility & misinformation receptivity. (effects are modest though) advances.in/psychology/1...
0158