Sign in

Taylor Webb

@taylorwwebb.bsky.social
1.5K followers 642 following 148 posts

Studying cognition in humans and machines. Assistant Prof at Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology. scholar.google.com/citations?user=W…

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Mark R. Saddler @msaddler.bsky.social · 23h
Pleased to share my new preprint with @joshhmcdermott.bsky.social and Torsten Dau: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6... ! It shows that many of the characteristic limits of human hearing emerge from perceptual representations optimized for everyday hearing behavior. [1/6]
biorxiv.org
1114
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Josh McDermott @joshhmcdermott.bsky.social · 23h
New work by @msaddler.bsky.social with a striking finding: a wide range of human perceptual thresholds are replicated in a neural network optimized for real-world auditory tasks. Suggests that thresholds are determined by linear separability in task-optimized representations.
0289
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Steve Fleming @smfleming.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
Excited to be launching our new PhD program in Minds and Machines at UCL with co-Directors Tali Sharot and @nadinedijkstra.bsky.social To apply, find out more here: www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-scienc... Our launch event is on Nov 10th, with a cracking lineup of speakers: luma.com/cikzcth0
lnkd.in
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
210051
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Melissa Franch, PhD @mfranch.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Excited to see this work published! We find that the brain codes semantic relationships similar to contextual LLMs (like GPT2) but unlike LLMs, uses contrastive coding to prevent confusion of highly similar words. Many thanks to the reviewers and BCM neurosurgery team! www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
A population code for semantics in human hippocampus - Nature Neuroscience
Franch et al. show that human hippocampal neurons encode the meanings of the words we hear through distributed, context-sensitive population activity that mirrors some features of large language model...
312136
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Dr Anna Leshinskaya @annaleshinskaya.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
I am recruiting graduate students for UCI's PhD in Cognitive Sciences - www.cogsci.uci.edu/graduate/pro... The lab's focus is on how relational structure and combinatorial reasoning is implemented in human brains and large language models--and if they are similar.
cogsci.uci.edu
GRADUATE PROGRAM
13430
Reposted by Taylor Webb
ingmarvisser.bsky.social @ingmarvisser.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
New paper 🍼📄 ManyBabies 3 is out (open access, registered report in Developmental Science). 30 labs, 33 languages, 839 infants set out to replicate a textbook finding: 7-month-olds learn abstract rules from speech (@garymarcus.bsky.social et al., 1999). We didn’t find it. 🧵
37948
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
But how do you determine if something is in-fact innate or learned? The point of the digital twin studies is they show an apparently innate behavior is explainable by a learning model. The modeling is part of interpreting the data.
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
I didn’t mean to make a distinction between empirical and in-principle arguments, I was arguing that nativism often refers to denials (whether in-fact or in-principle) of learnability at both the symbolic and subsymbolic levels.
120
Reposted by Taylor Webb
abrsvn.bsky.social @abrsvn.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
New paper at babylm.github.io on "Relational Attention for Data-Efficient Language Modeling" with @ecekt.bsky.social and Jakub Dotlačil, building on the seminal work of @taylorwwebb.bsky.social , @awni.bsky.social and others. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.20530. Code: github.com/abrsvn/babyl...
babylm.github.io
BabyLM 4 at EMNLP 2026
084
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Marlene Berke @marleneberke.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Do non-human primates have theory of mind? My new paper takes a new computational approach to this classic question. We implemented verbal theories of primates' mental representations as computational models. These models completed classic visual perspective-taking tasks.
29034
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Jake’s paper argues that there’s two distinct senses of learning and that sometimes people have been talking past eachother by not clarifying which they’re talking about, which I agree with. But I don’t think nativists broadly have only considered symbolic learning.
120
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
I don’t think it’s necessarily ill-posed, one can ask whether a particular capacity can be the result of either type of learning. I think many prominent nativist arguments understand the notion of subsymbolic learning and deny that it can account for development.
110
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Steve Fleming @smfleming.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Our paper “Confidence is detection-like in high-dimensional spaces” is now published in Open Mind, led by @wiktoriakozyra.bsky.social and @kevingoneill.github.io direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...
direct.mit.edu
Confidence Is Detection-Like in High-Dimensional Spaces
Abstract. Confidence estimates are often “detection-like”—driven by positive evidence in favour of a decision. This empirical observation has been interpreted as showing that human metacognition is li...
15214
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
I appreciate this context about developmental psych / fodor’s arguments, which is genuinely new to me! As a last point, would you agree that it’s at least coherent to argue that neither symbolic nor subsymbolic learning can account for development? That’s how I’ve always interpreted some nativists.
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
I do think a level-independent description of the debate is possible if your view is that no form of learning, symbolic or subsymbolic, can account for cognitive development, which is how I've interpreted various nativist theorists (though possibly not fodor).
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
I see, thanks for the explanations! My main point is that there's a coherent, non-terminological debate often referred to as the empiricism-nativism debate, that asks roughly whether learning (whether symbolic or subsymbolic) can account for certain cognitive capacities.
120
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
As I understand it, there's a question about whether the competences really are present at birth, or require some small amount of (generic, non-task-specific) exposure to the environment, which can potentially be captured by learning in neural networks.
130
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
The chick data is relevant to innateness bc of the assumption that the relevant behaviors can’t be learned from the developmental inputs, which seems plausible on its face, but the neural network results show that assumption is wrong.
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Perhaps it’s fair to say that the neural network results show that the baby chick data doesn’t necessarily support nativism? (Rather than providing positive evidence for empiricism in the case of the chicks)
111
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
To the extent that digital twin studies show that generic neural networks can develop cognitive capacities from developmentally matched training data, that arguably resolves the debate in favor of empiricism.
000
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
So, although it's very useful to clarify potential terminological discrepancies, I think it's an overstatement to say that this dissolves the debate entirely.
100
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
More broadly, I would argue that the field in general understands ‘nativism’ to refer to the view that some capacities can’t be learned in any sense, rather than the narrow view that some capacities aren’t learned over symbolic concepts.
210
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Paradigmatic nativists (chomsky, pinker, marcus, etc) have repeatedly argued that general-purpose neural networks cannot learn certain capacities, or can’t account for how early certain capacities are learned.
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
While this matches the way that some nativists (e.g. fodor) have talked about learning, I think this overstates the way that the debate is broadly understood in the field.
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Thus, digital twin studies–showing the emergence of seemingly innate behaviors in generic neural network architectures with developmentally curated training data–can fail to overturn nativism on this definition because learning in these neural networks doesn’t operate over symbolic concepts.
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
The crux of the argument is that ‘learning’ is used in two different senses, with nativists meaning learning over symbolic concepts, and empiricists meaning subsymbolic (e.g. connectionist) learning, such that whatever is happening in neural networks doesn’t count as learning to nativists.
110
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
This is a very interesting paper that makes some useful clarifications between different senses of learning, however I think it overstates the extent to which the nativism vs. empiricism debate stems purely from terminological confusion. (1/x)
3152
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Princeton Neuroscience Institute @princetonneuro.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
We're hiring! PNI is recruiting an assistant professor of neuroscience working with non-human primates in any area. Review begins Oct 19: apply.interfolio.com/192521 #NeuroJobs #Neuroskyence
photo of PNI and psychology building
04853
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Tom McCoy @rtommccoy.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖 (The result of an 8-year project!) LLMs seem very different from symbolic systems. Yet LLMs excel in symbolic domains (e.g., language/code/math). How do they do it? Our finding: LLM representations have implicit symbolic structure! Link in thread ⬇️ 1/n
Overview of the paper. 
Title: The Emergent Symbolic Structure of Artificial Neural Networks
Authors: Tom McCoy, Paul Soulos, Tal Linzen, Paul Smolensky
Left: Neural networks encode information in vectors (there is then an image of a vector), yet they excel at tasks long thought to require symbolic structure (there is then an image of a symbolic representation, specifically a syntax tree). How do LLMs do it?
Right: We find that LLM representations can be closely approximated with symbolic structures. This approximation lets us edit the structure of an LLM’s output by editing the structure of its internal representations, as shown. There is then an image of two edits to LLMs. In the first one, the original input is 3 + 6 * 8, with an answer of 51. But if we swap the positions of the 3 and the 6, the output becomes 30. In the second one, the original input is a Python command repeating the list [Z, U] three times, producing [Z, U, Z, U, Z, U]. But if we edit the input in a way that adds a Q at the end of the input, the output becomes [Z, U, Q, Z, U, Q, Z, U, Q].
431888
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Victoria Bosch @initself.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
Are brains and artificial neural networks converging onto universal representations? There is a seductive idea making the rounds in NeuroAI / machine learning: train systems well enough, and they all converge on the same representation of reality (i.e. a unique world model). We have thoughts™ 1/n
cell.com
The Umwelt Representation Hypothesis: rethinking Universality
Recent studies reveal striking representational alignment between artificial neural networks (ANNs) and biological brains, leading to proposals that all sufficiently capable systems converge on univer...
818175
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Harrison Ritz @hritz.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
Our task-switching paper is now out at Current Biology! www.cell.com/current-biol... We find that that our brains reset to a task-neutral state between trials, providing flexibility when the upcoming task is uncertain. RNNs also learn this strategy, but only when trained to switch tasks.
schematic of how a brain might reset to a neutral state between trials
315665
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Tim Kietzmann @timkietzmann.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
We are hiring a full professor for "Intelligence in biological and artificial systems". If you don't know about the German system yet, let me tell you a little bit about working as a professor at the institute. Thread 👇
13116
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Sam Nastase @samnastase.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
We’re recruiting a full-time lab manager to join the Shared Minds Lab at USC! This will be a great opportunity for someone who wants to get hands-on experience with research before starting a PhD program in psychology or neuroscience. More below:
44123
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Adrien Doerig @adriendoerig.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
The journal version is out! www.cell.com/trends-open/... AI is turning machine consciousness into a societal issue. Biological Naturalism (BN), the idea that only biological systems can be conscious, is gaining traction. We argue: either BN is untestable, or it is compatible with functionalism.
cell.com
What biology can and cannot tell us about conscious AI
Progress in artificial intelligence is turning machine consciousness from a philosophical curiosity into a societal issue, and has led to criticism of the widespread computational functionalist framew...
45819
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Sam Gershman @gershbrain.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
@arthurpr4t.bsky.social has a new preprint with important results on a famous psychophysical law (Weber's law). It isn't, in fact, a law, because it can be broken. A more fundamental principle (efficient coding) shows when and why Weber's law holds true. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
biorxiv.org
Efficient coding makes and breaks Weber's law
Weber's law is a rare quantitative regularity in psychology, yet its origins remain debated. Here we provide causal evidence that it arises from the more fundamental principle of efficient coding. Thi...
413041
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
New position piece w/ @tylerbonnen.bsky.social out now in COBS! We suggest that data augmentation is a useful framework for understanding hippocampal contributions to generalization, and offers a path towards more precise modeling: 1/
Data augmentation as a framework for modeling hippocampal contributions to generalization
14714
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Thomas Serre @thomasserre.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
Very much looking forward to welcoming a new colleague! We're hiring at both ranks — the senior (Associate/Full) search is open too, applications due Oct 15: apply.interfolio.com/190696
0237
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Thomas Serre @thomasserre.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
We're recruiting postdoc fellows in computational neuroscience for Brown's NIH T32 Training Program — brain & cognitive modeling from biophysics to AI, with connections to mental health & psychiatry. US citizens/PRs. Review begins Sept 1. @carneyinstitute @browncopsy apply.interfolio.com/190111
01412
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Ben Hayden @benhayden.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
New paper from the BCM Neurosurgery research team! "Neural basis of compositional control" led by @assiachericoni.bsky.social and @justfineneuro.bsky.social ! 🧵 www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Neural basis of compositional control - Nature
Behaviour of human participants in a prey-pursuit task reflects dynamic blending of goal-specific control policies, with hippocampus estimating latent states, anterior cingulate cortex orchestrating p...
39546
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Hayoung Song @hayoungsong.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
The Naturalistic Cognitive Computational Neuroscience Lab is launching at UT Austin and is looking for founding members at all levels, including lab manager, PhD students, and postdocs! #NeuroJobs We will study human brain🧠 and memory & attention, using fMRI and modeling. thesonglab.github.io
28949
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Hardik Rajpal @h-rajpal.bsky.social · 06/08/2026
What role does Emergence play in Neural Networks? We find that learning emergent low-dimensional representations is key for out-of-distribution generalisation. New Preprint out with @neural-reckoning.org arxiv.org/abs/2607.10430
arxiv.org
Emergent Generalization by Representation Learning in Artificial Neural Networks
Dimensionality reduction has proven powerful for identifying neural manifolds, which are low-dimensional structures underlying high-dimensional neural activity. These low-dimensional representations h...
25418
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 06/08/2026
Then @jonkoenig.bsky.social will present a spotlight poster in the afternoon session ‘Trading Generalization for Working Memory Capacity in Neural Network Representations’ 2026.ccneuro.org/poster/?id=p...
2026.ccneuro.org
Poster Presentation
090
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 06/08/2026
Happening today at #CCN @melodylizx.bsky.social will give a talk + spotlight poster ‘Data diversity drives the emergence of symbolic mechanisms in LLMs’ in the morning session 2026.ccneuro.org/contributed-...
2026.ccneuro.org
Contributed Talk Session
061
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
Very excited to be involved with this much needed effort as a senior editor, a new journal focused on natural and artificial minds, please submit your work!
0222
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
Happening this morning at #CCN poster session C, @zahmb.bsky.social will present ‘Mechanisms of Emergent Analogical Mapping’ 2026.ccneuro.org/poster/?id=p... please check it out if you’re at CCN!
2026.ccneuro.org
Poster Presentation
072
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
I'll be at CCN next week. Please get in touch if you want to chat about these positions.
0102
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
I'm recruiting two postdocs (or potentially PhD students) to work on projects at the intersection of cognition, neuroscience, and AI (with a particular emphasis on mechanistic interpretability). Apply here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... and please share!
docs.google.com
37142
Reposted by Taylor Webb
Eleanor Holton @eleanor-holton.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
So thrilled to be joining the Psychology Department at @columbiauniversity.bsky.social as an assistant prof next summer! I'll be recruiting for PhD/postdoc to start in Autumn 2027, so if you're interested in using computational approaches to studying human cognition please get in touch!
1312518
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
I'll be at CCN next week. Please get in touch if you want to chat about these positions.
0102
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
I'm recruiting two postdocs (or potentially PhD students) to work on projects at the intersection of cognition, neuroscience, and AI (with a particular emphasis on mechanistic interpretability). Apply here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... and please share!
docs.google.com
37142