Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 26/09/2026The phrase "stochastic parrot" is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Which, ironically, is exactly what the authors got wrong about language, and the core technical mistake of the paper. 1/ (cross-quote-post because I think this topic is important) 5533
Reposted by Andrew LampinenTomer Ullman @tomerullman.bsky.social · 22/09/2026new preprint: "Directing large language models to follow the letter or spirit of the law" arxiv.org/pdf/2609.23083 (by Qian , Li, Chen, Murthy @soniakmurthy.bsky.social , Belinkov, and me) this is particularly cool/important, and I'm allowed to say it because it was headed by @pqian.bsky.social 17323
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 21/09/2026New post reflecting on recent AI progress in math, how AI is changing the way we work, and some worries about where people will find meaning as they offload more of their work to AI: infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/math-resea...infinitefaculty.substack.comMath, research, and meaning in the age of AISince I wrote my last post about AI and math, the theorems have continued to fall. 0372
Reposted by Andrew LampinenJane Li 🦖 @janeli.bsky.social · 17/09/2026🦀New preprint! (w/ @najoung.bsky.social)🦞 Is grammaticality a major organizing principle of NLM representations? We show that many NLMs exhibit abstract rep. separation for grammaticality. We believe this work addresses debates about confounds in measuring model gram. knowledge. [1/10] 12010
Reposted by Andrew LampinenTimothy Gowers @wtgowers.bsky.social · 17/09/2026I've written a blog post responding to the letter about maths and AI signed by 25 Fields medallists. As with the Leiden Declaration, I didn't sign it, but I agree with much of it and welcome its existence. gowers.wordpress.com/2026/09/17/w...gowers.wordpress.comWhy I didn’t sign the Fields medallists’ letterWhen I was around 11 I heard for the first time about Fermat’s Last Theorem. I was immediately captivated by the problem statement, as well as by the accompanying story, and made a fairly ser… 45523
Reposted by Andrew LampinenSam Nastase @samnastase.bsky.social · 18/08/2026New perspective piece out in @cp-neuron.bsky.social with Zaid Zada, @adelegoldberg.bsky.social, and Uri Hasson! We try to articulate some of our excitement about LLMs and discuss what kinds of insights they might provide into the neural computations supporting natural language in the human brain. 18625
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 14/08/2026New position piece w/ @tylerbonnen.bsky.social out now in COBS! We suggest that data augmentation is a useful framework for understanding hippocampal contributions to generalization, and offers a path towards more precise modeling: 1/ 14814
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 05/08/2026Yet another (popular) article on human/LM reasoning that (as usual) I'm deeply disappointed to see casually presupposes that humans do something called "reasoning" that's implied to be linking together steps that logically follow without any qualification, then proceeds to be dismissive 1/ 3675
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 27/07/2026What should we make of recent language model advancements in mathematics? In my new post, I reflect on long-standing cognitive debates about symbols and neural networks in light of this progress. infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/symbols-ne...infinitefaculty.substack.comSymbols, neural networks, and mathematical intelligenceSome reflections on connectionism and the basis of higher-level cognition 14913
Reposted by Andrew LampinenTed Underwood @tedunderwood.com · 27/07/2026Thoughtful and relevant outside math. A partial summary: Gowers thinks it’s important to sustain a human mathematical culture, but is unconvinced by the Leiden Declaration’s attempt to do that by reaffirming human ownership of specific *discoveries*. 5263
Reposted by Andrew LampinenTaylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 26/07/2026I'm recruiting two postdocs (or potentially PhD students) to work on projects at the intersection of cognition, neuroscience, and AI (with a particular emphasis on mechanistic interpretability). Apply here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... and please share!docs.google.com 37142
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 25/07/2026A few months ago (on a break between jobs) I went on the @stanfordpsypod.bsky.social to talk about my research journey from my cognitive psych PhD to industry, differences between academia and industry, what I've worked on, and how industry has changed since I joined. The episode is out now: 1150
Reposted by Andrew LampinenCogCompNeuro @cogcompneuro.bsky.social · 08/07/2026CCN began at Columbia in 2017. As #CCN2026 returns to New York City, a special Back2NY event will feature a crowd-sourced panel discussion on how the community has grown, prior challenges, and future perspectives. Share your experiences in the community survey: 2026.ccneuro.org/back2ny/ 1113
Reposted by Andrew LampinenJonathan Nicholas @jonathannicholas.bsky.social · 19/06/2026We make flexible choices in new situations by knitting together information from separate relevant memories. But what governs which memories are retrieved and when? In a new preprint, we captured how people build decision variables from different memories by tracking their gaze on a blank screen.biorxiv.orgFlexible decisions arise from resource-rational memory samplingFlexible decision making depends on retrieving and recombining memories. Yet because this process unfolds covertly, its governing principles remain unknown. Here we use gaze reinstatement to uncover t... 27527
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 12/06/2026Pleased to share that this work is now published in TMLR! openreview.net/forum?id=RuW...openreview.netLatent learning: episodic memory complements parametric learning by...When do machine learning systems fail to generalize, and what mechanisms could improve their generalization? Here, we draw inspiration from cognitive science to argue that one weakness of... 1346
Reposted by Andrew LampinenRaphaël Millière @raphaelmilliere.com · 11/06/2026Now published in open access! Your one-stop shop for the philosophy of language models. It's the spiritual descendant of our two-part preprint from 2024, fully updated. This should be particularly useful for anyone looking for an entry point into this rapidly growing field.compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.comThe Philosophy of Language ModelsThe success of large language models (LLMs) across many domains of AI research has generated intense debate. Some attribute their impressive performance on complex tasks to human-like linguistic and ... 211032
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 29/05/2026What are the real problems to be solved in continual learning? In my latest post, I tackle this question — reviewing where I think the field went astray in the past, how language models changed things, and where the real challenges remain. infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/what-are-t...infinitefaculty.substack.comWhat are the real problems of continual learning?Reflections on catastrophic interference, plasticity, and learning for the future in the era of large language models 37014
Reposted by Andrew LampinenTania Lombrozo @tanialombrozo.bsky.social · 27/05/2026Do LLMs *understand* language? Do educational AI agents *understand* the material they teach (or their students)? Claims about what AI systems do or don't understand are pervasive, but assessing them requires an account of MACHINE UNDERSTANDING 1012725
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 26/05/2026We've updated the preprint of our Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science paper (arxiv.org/abs/2502.20349) — we've tried to clarify and streamline the arguments, and added some new examples: 1/5arxiv.orgNaturalistic Computational Cognitive Science: Towards generalizable models and theories that capture the full range of natural behaviorHow can cognitive science build generalizable theories that span the full scope of natural situations and behaviors? We argue that progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers timely opportunities ... 13415
Reposted by Andrew LampinenTom McCoy @rtommccoy.bsky.social · 22/05/2026🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖 Children & neural networks can learn syntax from linear strings of words. How do they do it? Our hypothesis: Word co-occurrence statistics provide cues to syntax! (I.e., a new type of bootstrapping to consider!) Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2605.20529 1/n 2395
Reposted by Andrew LampinenMike Frank @mcxfrank.bsky.social · 18/05/2026What is a psychological theory? Here's our take on this tricky and controversial question in this week's Experimentology chapter summary. Many things called "theories" in psychology aren't actually theories — they're frameworks. 🧵 experimentology.io 312752
Reposted by Andrew LampinenMike Guerzhoy @guerzhoy.bsky.social · 20/04/2026To appear in Computational Brain & Behavior soon: the claimed 2024 proof (also in CBB) that AGI via learning is intractable also "proves" that ImageNet is intractable. My reading of the hole: equivocation on the variable D. Preprint here: arxiv.org/abs/2411.06498arxiv.orgBarriers to Complexity-Theoretic Proofs that "AGI" Using Machine Learning is ImpossibleA recent paper (van Rooij et al. 2024) claims to have proved that achieving human-like intelligence using learning from data is intractable in a complexity-theoretic sense. We point out that the proof... 1225
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 28/04/2026Can language models use subtext in their communication? Can they use common ground to incorporate subtext more effectively? In our new preprint, we study these questions across various domains — from visual communication to story writing games. 2154
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 03/04/2026When and how can test-time thinking allow models to use information latent in their training data? What are the benefits and tradeoffs relative to other solutions like synthetic data augmentation? Pleased to share (after a long delay) an exploration of these issues: arxiv.org/abs/2604.01430 thread:arxiv.orgImproving Latent Generalization Using Test-time ComputeLanguage Models (LMs) exhibit two distinct mechanisms for knowledge acquisition: in-weights learning (i.e., encoding information within the model weights) and in-context learning (ICL). Although these... 1257
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 17/03/2026Pleased to share that our paper "Representation Biases: Variance is Not Always a Good Proxy for Importance" is now out as Theory/New Concepts paper in eNeuro! www.eneuro.org/content/13/3... 1/eneuro.orgRepresentation Biases: Variance Is Not Always a Good Proxy for ImportanceA central approach in neuroscience is to analyze neural representations as a means to understand a system's function, through the use of methods like principal component analysis, regression, and repr... 17229
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 14/03/2026I joined Anthropic (alignment team) this week — exciting place to be at an exciting time! 182143
Reposted by Andrew LampinenPhillip Isola @phillipisola.bsky.social · 13/03/2026Sharing “Neural Thickets”. We find: In large models, the neighborhood around pretrained weights can become dense with task-improving solutions. In this regime, post-training can be easy; even random guessing works Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2603.12228 Web: thickets.mit.edu 1/ 610823
Reposted by Andrew LampinenKanishka Misra @kanishka.bsky.social · 10/03/2026What is the interplay between representations learned from (language) surface forms alone, and those learned from more grounded evidence (e.g.,vision)? Excited to share new work understanding “Cross-modal taxonomic generalization” in (V)LMs arxiv.org/abs/2603.07474 1/ 13311
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 07/03/2026Short post on what I call the "no-magic approach to understanding intelligent systems" — the philosophy I think of as motivating our work on understanding intelligence without resorting to magical thinking about AI or humans! infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/the-no-mag...infinitefaculty.substack.comThe no-magic approach to understanding intelligent systemsToday I want to write a bit about the philosophy I think underlies much of the work that my collaborators and I (as well as many other researchers that I respect) have done on understanding artificial... 1335
Reposted by Andrew LampinenHarvey Lederman @harveylederman.bsky.social · 06/03/2026Can large language models *introspect*? In a new paper, @kmahowald.bsky.social and I study the MECHANISM of introspection in big open-source models. tldr: Models detect internal anomalies through DIRECT ACCESS, but don't know what the anomalies are. And they love to guess “apple” 🍎 27115
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 03/03/2026After 5.5 years (or 7 or 9, counting internships), today was my last day at Google/DeepMind. When I was in London recently, I walked through the two floors that were (most of) DeepMind when I first joined, and thought about how much the company and field have changed since then. 2680
Reposted by Andrew LampinenMichael Lepori @michael-lepori.bsky.social · 26/02/2026🚨New preprint! In-context learning underlies LLMs’ real-world utility, but what are its limits? Can LLMs learn completely novel representations in-context and flexibly deploy them to solve tasks? In other words, can LLMs construct an in-context world model? Let’s see! 👀 1375
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 26/02/2026Really cool work — learning over sequential experiences that contain the embodied cue of viewpoint as well as visual inputs, can give rise to human-like 3D shape perception! 0101
Reposted by Andrew LampinenDileep George @dileeplearning @dileeplearning.bsky.social · 25/02/2026News! I've joined the Astera Institute to lead its neuroscience based AGI research. Backed by $1B+ commitment over the coming decade, my team will explore novel, brain-inspired architectures and algos toward safe, efficient human-like AGI, working alongside Doris Tsao. 1/ astera.org/dileep-georg...astera.orgDileep George joins Astera to lead its neuro-inspired AGI effortDileep George is joining Astera as Head of AI, leading our AGI research division. Working alongside our Chief Scientist Doris Tsao, he and the team will explore novel, brain-inspired computational arc... 13856
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 18/02/2026What is the relationship between memorization and generalization in AI? Is there a fundamental tradeoff? In infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/memorizati... I’ve reviewed some of the evolving perspectives on memorization & generalization in machine learning, from classic perspectives through LLMs.infinitefaculty.substack.comMemorization vs. generalization in deep learning: implicit biases, benign overfitting, and moreOr: how I learned to stop worrying and love the memorization 415629
Reposted by Andrew LampinenAndrew Saxe @saxelab.bsky.social · 16/02/2026Excited to launch Principia, a nonprofit research organisation at the intersection of deep learning theory and AI safety. Our goal is to develop theory for modern machine learning systems that can help us understand complex network behaviors, including those critical for AI safety and alignment. 1 19428
Reposted by Andrew LampinenJennifer Hu @jennhu.bsky.social · 12/02/2026I wrote a short article on AI Model Evaluation for the Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science 📕👇 Hope this is helpful for anyone who wants a super broad, beginner-friendly intro to the topic! Thanks @mcxfrank.bsky.social and @asifamajid.bsky.social for this amazing initiative! 05422
Reposted by Andrew LampinenNicole Rust @nicolecrust.bsky.social · 10/02/2026This work by @mariaeckstein.bsky.social et al is a nice example of how progress in psychology can be expedited with machine learning. How long before this type of approach is expected for models-of-behavior papers? My guess: not long. (If you are a trainee, nudge!) www.nature.com/articles/s41...nature.comHybrid neural–cognitive models reveal how memory shapes human reward learning - Nature Human BehaviourUsing artificial neural networks applied to human data, Eckstein et al. show that good models of reinforcement learning require memory components that track representations of the past. 1327
Reposted by Andrew LampinenDeclan Campbell @thisisadax.bsky.social · 05/02/2026The visual world is composed of objects, and those objects are composed of features. But do VLMs exploit this compositional structure when processing multi-object scenes? In our 🆒🆕 #ICLR2026 paper, we find they do – via emergent symbolic mechanisms for visual binding. 🧵👇 18326
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 04/02/2026Interesting results by @eghbal-hosseini.bsky.social on how language models representation geometry evolves during different types of in-context learning! 0180
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 31/01/2026Was a pleasure to discuss the cognitive basis of reasoning at an @ivado.bsky.social workshop with legends like @alisongopnik.bsky.social @lauraruis.bsky.social @taylorwwebb.bsky.social and Andrew Granville! 0200
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 29/01/2026New paper! In arxiv.org/abs/2601.20834 we study how language models representations of things like factuality evolve over a conversation. We find that in edge case conversations, e.g. about model consciousness or delusional content, model representations can change dramatically! 1/ 1718
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 23/01/2026Should you go to academia or industry for research in AI or cognitive science? It's the most common question I get asked by PhD students, and I've written up some of my thoughts on the answer, as an epilogue to my research-focused series on these fields: infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/on-researc...infinitefaculty.substack.comOn research careers in academia and industryThe epilogue to a series on Cognitive Science and AI 04912
Reposted by Andrew LampinenJonathan Nicholas @jonathannicholas.bsky.social · 23/01/2026Our experiences have countless details, and it can be hard to know which matter. How can we behave effectively in the future when, right now, we don't know what we'll need? Out today in @nathumbehav.nature.com , @marcelomattar.bsky.social and I find that people solve this by using episodic memory.nature.comEpisodic memory facilitates flexible decision-making via access to detailed events - Nature Human BehaviourNicholas and Mattar found that people use episodic memory to make decisions when it is unclear what will be needed in the future. These findings reveal how the rich representational capacity of episod... 713049
Reposted by Andrew LampinenMorten H. Christiansen @mh-christiansen.bsky.social · 21/01/2026I'm very excited about this paper with @yngwienielsen.bsky.social just out in @nathumbehav.nature.com in which we provide evidence for the mental representation of non-hierarchical linguistic structure in language use. 🧵 1/4 Read the paper here: rdcu.be/eZ26urdcu.beEvidence for the representation of non-hierarchical structures in languageNature Human Behaviour - Language is often thought to be represented through hierarchically structured units. Nielsen and Christiansen find that non-hierarchical structures are present across... 43512
Reposted by Andrew LampinenGary Lupyan @glupyan.bsky.social · 19/01/2026arxiv.org/abs/2601.11432 I want to share an astonishing result. LLMs can "translate" Jabberwocky' texts like 'He dwushed a ghanc zawk” & even and even 'In the BLANK BLANK, BLANK BLANK has BLANK over any BLANK BLANK’s BLANK' This has profound consequence for thinking about.. 1/2arxiv.org 1513734
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 13/01/2026When are impossibility proofs misleading? In infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/be-wary-of..., I discuss a common issue I see: proofs that are logically valid, but where the underlying assumptions are unjustified. I discuss ‘proofs’ that cognition cannot be tractably learned, and that LMs are 1/infinitefaculty.substack.comBe wary of assumptions in impossibility argumentsA proof is only as good as its assumptions 3375
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 05/01/2026What can cognitive science learn from AI? In infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/what-cogni... I outline how AI has found that scale and richness of learning experiences fundamentally change learning & generalization — and how I believe we should rethink cognitive experiments & theories in response.infinitefaculty.substack.comWhat cognitive science can learn from AI#3 in a series on cognitive science and AI 13614
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 23/12/2025New post! Last week I shared why I thought cognitive (neuro)science hasn’t contributed as much as one might hope to the design of AI systems; this week I'm sharing my thoughts on how methods and principles from these fields *have* been useful in my work. infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/how-cognit...infinitefaculty.substack.comHow cognitive science can contribute to AI: methods for understanding#2 in a series on cognitive science and AI 2428
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 16/12/2025Why isn’t modern AI built around principles from cognitive science or neuroscience? Starting a substack (infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/why-isnt-m...) by writing down my thoughts on that question: as part of a first series of posts giving my current thoughts on the relation between these fields. 1/3infinitefaculty.substack.comWhy isn’t modern AI built around principles from cognitive science?First post in a series on cognitive science and AI 412736