Sign in

Andrew Lampinen

@lampinen.bsky.social
8.2K followers 745 following 387 posts

Interested in cognition and artificial intelligence. Researcher at Anthropic; previously DeepMind, cognitive science at Stanford. Posts are mine. lampinen.github.io

PostsRepliesMedia
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
The phrase "stochastic parrot" is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Which, ironically, is exactly what the authors got wrong about language, and the core technical mistake of the paper. 1/ (cross-quote-post because I think this topic is important)
Melanie Mitchell on Twitter
Everyone!  This is a straw-person argument.  The Stochastic Parrot paper was about LLMs of 2021, not the AI of today, which are not LLMs but complex software systems with vast post training and many external software components.
5533
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Tomer Ullman @tomerullman.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
new preprint: "Directing large language models to follow the letter or spirit of the law" arxiv.org/pdf/2609.23083 (by Qian , Li, Chen, Murthy @soniakmurthy.bsky.social , Belinkov, and me) this is particularly cool/important, and I'm allowed to say it because it was headed by @pqian.bsky.social
17323
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
New post reflecting on recent AI progress in math, how AI is changing the way we work, and some worries about where people will find meaning as they offload more of their work to AI: infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/math-resea...
infinitefaculty.substack.com
Math, research, and meaning in the age of AI
Since I wrote my last post about AI and math, the theorems have continued to fall.
0372
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Jane Li 🦖 @janeli.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
🦀New preprint! (w/ @najoung.bsky.social)🦞 Is grammaticality a major organizing principle of NLM representations? We show that many NLMs exhibit abstract rep. separation for grammaticality. We believe this work addresses debates about confounds in measuring model gram. knowledge. [1/10]
12010
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Timothy Gowers @wtgowers.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
I've written a blog post responding to the letter about maths and AI signed by 25 Fields medallists. As with the Leiden Declaration, I didn't sign it, but I agree with much of it and welcome its existence. gowers.wordpress.com/2026/09/17/w...
gowers.wordpress.com
Why I didn’t sign the Fields medallists’ letter
When I was around 11 I heard for the first time about Fermat’s Last Theorem. I was immediately captivated by the problem statement, as well as by the accompanying story, and made a fairly ser…
45523
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Sam Nastase @samnastase.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
New perspective piece out in @cp-neuron.bsky.social with Zaid Zada, @adelegoldberg.bsky.social, and Uri Hasson! We try to articulate some of our excitement about LLMs and discuss what kinds of insights they might provide into the neural computations supporting natural language in the human brain.
18625
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
New position piece w/ @tylerbonnen.bsky.social out now in COBS! We suggest that data augmentation is a useful framework for understanding hippocampal contributions to generalization, and offers a path towards more precise modeling: 1/
Data augmentation as a framework for modeling hippocampal contributions to generalization
14814
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
Yet another (popular) article on human/LM reasoning that (as usual) I'm deeply disappointed to see casually presupposes that humans do something called "reasoning" that's implied to be linking together steps that logically follow without any qualification, then proceeds to be dismissive 1/
"Reasoning comes in many technically defined forms(opens a new tab), but the basic procedure is easily recognizable: arriving at a sound conclusion by linking together intermediate steps that logically follow from each other. We do this with thoughts; LRMs use so-called chains of thought [...]" from https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-ai-reasoning-right-for-the-wrong-reasons-20260731/
3675
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
What should we make of recent language model advancements in mathematics? In my new post, I reflect on long-standing cognitive debates about symbols and neural networks in light of this progress. infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/symbols-ne...
infinitefaculty.substack.com
Symbols, neural networks, and mathematical intelligence
Some reflections on connectionism and the basis of higher-level cognition
14913
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Ted Underwood @tedunderwood.com · 27/07/2026
Thoughtful and relevant outside math. A partial summary: Gowers thinks it’s important to sustain a human mathematical culture, but is unconvinced by the Leiden Declaration’s attempt to do that by reaffirming human ownership of specific *discoveries*.
5263
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Taylor Webb @taylorwwebb.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
I'm recruiting two postdocs (or potentially PhD students) to work on projects at the intersection of cognition, neuroscience, and AI (with a particular emphasis on mechanistic interpretability). Apply here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... and please share!
docs.google.com
37142
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 25/07/2026
A few months ago (on a break between jobs) I went on the @stanfordpsypod.bsky.social to talk about my research journey from my cognitive psych PhD to industry, differences between academia and industry, what I've worked on, and how industry has changed since I joined. The episode is out now:
1150
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
CogCompNeuro @cogcompneuro.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
CCN began at Columbia in 2017. As #CCN2026 returns to New York City, a special Back2NY event will feature a crowd-sourced panel discussion on how the community has grown, prior challenges, and future perspectives. Share your experiences in the community survey: 2026.ccneuro.org/back2ny/
1113
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Jonathan Nicholas @jonathannicholas.bsky.social · 19/06/2026
We make flexible choices in new situations by knitting together information from separate relevant memories. But what governs which memories are retrieved and when? In a new preprint, we captured how people build decision variables from different memories by tracking their gaze on a blank screen.
biorxiv.org
Flexible decisions arise from resource-rational memory sampling
Flexible decision making depends on retrieving and recombining memories. Yet because this process unfolds covertly, its governing principles remain unknown. Here we use gaze reinstatement to uncover t...
27527
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Pleased to share that this work is now published in TMLR! openreview.net/forum?id=RuW...
openreview.net
Latent learning: episodic memory complements parametric learning by...
When do machine learning systems fail to generalize, and what mechanisms could improve their generalization? Here, we draw inspiration from cognitive science to argue that one weakness of...
1346
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Raphaël Millière @raphaelmilliere.com · 11/06/2026
Now published in open access! Your one-stop shop for the philosophy of language models. It's the spiritual descendant of our two-part preprint from 2024, fully updated. This should be particularly useful for anyone looking for an entry point into this rapidly growing field.
compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
The Philosophy of Language Models
The success of large language models (LLMs) across many domains of AI research has generated intense debate. Some attribute their impressive performance on complex tasks to human-like linguistic and ...
211032
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
What are the real problems to be solved in continual learning? In my latest post, I tackle this question — reviewing where I think the field went astray in the past, how language models changed things, and where the real challenges remain. infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/what-are-t...
infinitefaculty.substack.com
What are the real problems of continual learning?
Reflections on catastrophic interference, plasticity, and learning for the future in the era of large language models
37014
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Tania Lombrozo @tanialombrozo.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
Do LLMs *understand* language? Do educational AI agents *understand* the material they teach (or their students)? Claims about what AI systems do or don't understand are pervasive, but assessing them requires an account of MACHINE UNDERSTANDING
1012725
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
We've updated the preprint of our Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science paper (arxiv.org/abs/2502.20349) — we've tried to clarify and streamline the arguments, and added some new examples: 1/5
arxiv.org
Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science: Towards generalizable models and theories that capture the full range of natural behavior
How can cognitive science build generalizable theories that span the full scope of natural situations and behaviors? We argue that progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers timely opportunities ...
13415
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Tom McCoy @rtommccoy.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
🤖🧠NEW PAPER🧠🤖 Children & neural networks can learn syntax from linear strings of words. How do they do it? Our hypothesis: Word co-occurrence statistics provide cues to syntax! (I.e., a new type of bootstrapping to consider!) Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2605.20529 1/n
Paper overview.
Title: "Collocational bootstrapping: A hypothesis about the learning of subject-verb agreement in humans and neural networks"
Authors: Claire Hobbs and Tom McCoy
Method: We trained many neural nets, varying how predictable a subject is given its verb. We tested them on subject-verb agreement
Findings: With the right level of predictability, neural networks robustly generalize. The predictability of child-directed language is near the neural net optimum.
Conclusion: Statistical regularities in word co-occurrence can support the learning of abstract syntactic rules
The text is accompanied by a graph showing neural-network accuracy as a function of the level of variability; the accuracy peaks at an in-between level of variability
2395
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Mike Frank @mcxfrank.bsky.social · 18/05/2026
What is a psychological theory? Here's our take on this tricky and controversial question in this week's Experimentology chapter summary. Many things called "theories" in psychology aren't actually theories — they're frameworks. 🧵 experimentology.io
312752
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Mike Guerzhoy @guerzhoy.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
To appear in Computational Brain & Behavior soon: the claimed 2024 proof (also in CBB) that AGI via learning is intractable also "proves" that ImageNet is intractable. My reading of the hole: equivocation on the variable D. Preprint here: arxiv.org/abs/2411.06498
arxiv.org
Barriers to Complexity-Theoretic Proofs that "AGI" Using Machine Learning is Impossible
A recent paper (van Rooij et al. 2024) claims to have proved that achieving human-like intelligence using learning from data is intractable in a complexity-theoretic sense. We point out that the proof...
1225
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
Can language models use subtext in their communication? Can they use common ground to incorporate subtext more effectively? In our new preprint, we study these questions across various domains — from visual communication to story writing games.
2154
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 03/04/2026
When and how can test-time thinking allow models to use information latent in their training data? What are the benefits and tradeoffs relative to other solutions like synthetic data augmentation? Pleased to share (after a long delay) an exploration of these issues: arxiv.org/abs/2604.01430 thread:
arxiv.org
Improving Latent Generalization Using Test-time Compute
Language Models (LMs) exhibit two distinct mechanisms for knowledge acquisition: in-weights learning (i.e., encoding information within the model weights) and in-context learning (ICL). Although these...
1257
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 17/03/2026
Pleased to share that our paper "Representation Biases: Variance is Not Always a Good Proxy for Importance" is now out as Theory/New Concepts paper in eNeuro! www.eneuro.org/content/13/3... 1/
eneuro.org
Representation Biases: Variance Is Not Always a Good Proxy for Importance
A central approach in neuroscience is to analyze neural representations as a means to understand a system's function, through the use of methods like principal component analysis, regression, and repr...
17229
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 14/03/2026
I joined Anthropic (alignment team) this week — exciting place to be at an exciting time!
182143
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Phillip Isola @phillipisola.bsky.social · 13/03/2026
Sharing “Neural Thickets”. We find: In large models, the neighborhood around pretrained weights can become dense with task-improving solutions. In this regime, post-training can be easy; even random guessing works Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2603.12228 Web: thickets.mit.edu 1/
610823
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Kanishka Misra @kanishka.bsky.social · 10/03/2026
What is the interplay between representations learned from (language) surface forms alone, and those learned from more grounded evidence (e.g.,vision)? Excited to share new work understanding “Cross-modal taxonomic generalization” in (V)LMs arxiv.org/abs/2603.07474 1/
title section of the paper: “Cross-Modal Taxonomic Generalization in (Vision) Language Models” by Tianyang Xu, Marcelo Sandoval-Castañeda, Karen Livescu, Greg Shakhnarovich, Kanishka Misra.
13311
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 07/03/2026
Short post on what I call the "no-magic approach to understanding intelligent systems" — the philosophy I think of as motivating our work on understanding intelligence without resorting to magical thinking about AI or humans! infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/the-no-mag...
infinitefaculty.substack.com
The no-magic approach to understanding intelligent systems
Today I want to write a bit about the philosophy I think underlies much of the work that my collaborators and I (as well as many other researchers that I respect) have done on understanding artificial...
1335
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Harvey Lederman @harveylederman.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
Can large language models *introspect*? In a new paper, @kmahowald.bsky.social and I study the MECHANISM of introspection in big open-source models. tldr: Models detect internal anomalies through DIRECT ACCESS, but don't know what the anomalies are. And they love to guess “apple” 🍎
27115
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 03/03/2026
After 5.5 years (or 7 or 9, counting internships), today was my last day at Google/DeepMind. When I was in London recently, I walked through the two floors that were (most of) DeepMind when I first joined, and thought about how much the company and field have changed since then.
View of London from a rooftop in Kings Cross
2680
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Michael Lepori @michael-lepori.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
🚨New preprint! In-context learning underlies LLMs’ real-world utility, but what are its limits? Can LLMs learn completely novel representations in-context and flexibly deploy them to solve tasks? In other words, can LLMs construct an in-context world model? Let’s see! 👀
1375
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
Really cool work — learning over sequential experiences that contain the embodied cue of viewpoint as well as visual inputs, can give rise to human-like 3D shape perception!
0101
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Dileep George @dileeplearning @dileeplearning.bsky.social · 25/02/2026
News! I've joined the Astera Institute to lead its neuroscience based AGI research. Backed by $1B+ commitment over the coming decade, my team will explore novel, brain-inspired architectures and algos toward safe, efficient human-like AGI, working alongside Doris Tsao. 1/ astera.org/dileep-georg...
astera.org
Dileep George joins Astera to lead its neuro-inspired AGI effort
Dileep George is joining Astera as Head of AI, leading our AGI research division. Working alongside our Chief Scientist Doris Tsao, he and the team will explore novel, brain-inspired computational arc...
13856
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 18/02/2026
What is the relationship between memorization and generalization in AI? Is there a fundamental tradeoff? In infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/memorizati... I’ve reviewed some of the evolving perspectives on memorization & generalization in machine learning, from classic perspectives through LLMs.
infinitefaculty.substack.com
Memorization vs. generalization in deep learning: implicit biases, benign overfitting, and more
Or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the memorization
415629
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Andrew Saxe @saxelab.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
Excited to launch Principia, a nonprofit research organisation at the intersection of deep learning theory and AI safety. Our goal is to develop theory for modern machine learning systems that can help us understand complex network behaviors, including those critical for AI safety and alignment. 1
19428
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Jennifer Hu @jennhu.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
I wrote a short article on AI Model Evaluation for the Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science 📕👇 Hope this is helpful for anyone who wants a super broad, beginner-friendly intro to the topic! Thanks @mcxfrank.bsky.social and @asifamajid.bsky.social for this amazing initiative!
05422
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Nicole Rust @nicolecrust.bsky.social · 10/02/2026
This work by @mariaeckstein.bsky.social et al is a nice example of how progress in psychology can be expedited with machine learning. How long before this type of approach is expected for models-of-behavior papers? My guess: not long. (If you are a trainee, nudge!) www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Hybrid neural–cognitive models reveal how memory shapes human reward learning - Nature Human Behaviour
Using artificial neural networks applied to human data, Eckstein et al. show that good models of reinforcement learning require memory components that track representations of the past.
1327
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Declan Campbell @thisisadax.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
The visual world is composed of objects, and those objects are composed of features. But do VLMs exploit this compositional structure when processing multi-object scenes? In our 🆒🆕 #ICLR2026 paper, we find they do – via emergent symbolic mechanisms for visual binding. 🧵👇
18326
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
Interesting results by @eghbal-hosseini.bsky.social on how language models representation geometry evolves during different types of in-context learning!
0180
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 31/01/2026
Was a pleasure to discuss the cognitive basis of reasoning at an @ivado.bsky.social workshop with legends like @alisongopnik.bsky.social @lauraruis.bsky.social @taylorwwebb.bsky.social and Andrew Granville!
Panel discussion on the cognitive basis of reasoning in Minds and AI with Andrew Lampinen, Alison Gopnik, Laura Ruis, Andrew Granville, and Taylor Webb
0200
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 29/01/2026
New paper! In arxiv.org/abs/2601.20834 we study how language models representations of things like factuality evolve over a conversation. We find that in edge case conversations, e.g. about model consciousness or delusional content, model representations can change dramatically! 1/
Representations in language models can change dramatically over a conversation. Conceptual overview: left is a stimulated conversation between a user and a model, right is a plot of the models linear representations of factuality of answers to questions like "do you have qualia" over the conversation — the answers that start factual flip over the conversation to non-factual, and vice versa.
1718
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
Should you go to academia or industry for research in AI or cognitive science? It's the most common question I get asked by PhD students, and I've written up some of my thoughts on the answer, as an epilogue to my research-focused series on these fields: infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/on-researc...
infinitefaculty.substack.com
On research careers in academia and industry
The epilogue to a series on Cognitive Science and AI
04912
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Jonathan Nicholas @jonathannicholas.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
Our experiences have countless details, and it can be hard to know which matter. How can we behave effectively in the future when, right now, we don't know what we'll need? Out today in @nathumbehav.nature.com , @marcelomattar.bsky.social and I find that people solve this by using episodic memory.
nature.com
Episodic memory facilitates flexible decision-making via access to detailed events - Nature Human Behaviour
Nicholas and Mattar found that people use episodic memory to make decisions when it is unclear what will be needed in the future. These findings reveal how the rich representational capacity of episod...
713049
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Morten H. Christiansen @mh-christiansen.bsky.social · 21/01/2026
I'm very excited about this paper with @yngwienielsen.bsky.social just out in @nathumbehav.nature.com in which we provide evidence for the mental representation of non-hierarchical linguistic structure in language use. 🧵 1/4 Read the paper here: rdcu.be/eZ26u
rdcu.be
Evidence for the representation of non-hierarchical structures in language
Nature Human Behaviour - Language is often thought to be represented through hierarchically structured units. Nielsen and Christiansen find that non-hierarchical structures are present across...
43512
Reposted by Andrew Lampinen
Gary Lupyan @glupyan.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
arxiv.org/abs/2601.11432 I want to share an astonishing result. LLMs can "translate" Jabberwocky' texts like 'He dwushed a ghanc zawk” & even and even 'In the BLANK BLANK, BLANK BLANK has BLANK over any BLANK BLANK’s BLANK' This has profound consequence for thinking about.. 1/2
arxiv.org
1513734
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
When are impossibility proofs misleading? In infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/be-wary-of..., I discuss a common issue I see: proofs that are logically valid, but where the underlying assumptions are unjustified. I discuss ‘proofs’ that cognition cannot be tractably learned, and that LMs are 1/
infinitefaculty.substack.com
Be wary of assumptions in impossibility arguments
A proof is only as good as its assumptions
3375
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 05/01/2026
What can cognitive science learn from AI? In infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/what-cogni... I outline how AI has found that scale and richness of learning experiences fundamentally change learning & generalization — and how I believe we should rethink cognitive experiments & theories in response.
infinitefaculty.substack.com
What cognitive science can learn from AI
#3 in a series on cognitive science and AI
13614
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
New post! Last week I shared why I thought cognitive (neuro)science hasn’t contributed as much as one might hope to the design of AI systems; this week I'm sharing my thoughts on how methods and principles from these fields *have* been useful in my work. infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/how-cognit...
infinitefaculty.substack.com
How cognitive science can contribute to AI: methods for understanding
#2 in a series on cognitive science and AI
2428
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Why isn’t modern AI built around principles from cognitive science or neuroscience? Starting a substack (infinitefaculty.substack.com/p/why-isnt-m...) by writing down my thoughts on that question: as part of a first series of posts giving my current thoughts on the relation between these fields. 1/3
infinitefaculty.substack.com
Why isn’t modern AI built around principles from cognitive science?
First post in a series on cognitive science and AI
412736