Sign in

katie, phd!

@sciencekatie.bsky.social
377 followers 671 following 32 posts

neuroscience phd | first-gen college grad

PostsRepliesMedia
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 25/06/2025
if chatgpt has no haters, i have died
010
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 30/04/2025
chatgpt is what my parents and elementary school teachers *thought* wikipedia was
020
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
030
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 24/04/2025
I CAN'T BELIEVE I'M WRITING MY PHD THESIS!!!!!!! IM DISSERTATING!!!!! AND I'M ALMOST DONE??????
020
Reposted by katie, phd!
Christina Warren @filmgirl.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
With 23andMe filing for bankruptcy -- reach out to your family members who might have ordered these kits to get them to request deletion of their data. And if you signed-up yourself, you should absolutely do the same!
18698266
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 13/03/2025
This is so awesome. I'm glad someone is doing this important work to educate those in power!!! and I'm especially glad it's you audrey :)))
030
Reposted by katie, phd!
Bita Moghaddam @bita137.bsky.social · 12/03/2025
In leu of NIH cuts at Columbia, many folks are asking why aren't universities using endowment funds to support the research mission of their faculty scientists? Inspired by @jeremymberg.bsky.social bluetorials here are a few of the reasons that is not a sustainable option 1/n
75820
Reposted by katie, phd!
Jamie Mazer @tyto96.bsky.social · 12/03/2025
I think it's really important to remember that not all schools where research is done have endowments. So even if the top-tier/wealthy schools could tap into their endowments, this is not an option for some public unis and they will have to drop research missions.
1132
Reposted by katie, phd!
Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
...This piece is really important because we are not allowed to communicate this to grantees, but it could potentially help a lot of people about to submit stuff if they just knew to avoid certain words on their biosketch and other support."
14213
Reposted by katie, phd!
Brian Trainor @briantrainor.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
“You never heard of us because we are doing our jobs” UC Davis plant pathology PhD student
0448
Reposted by katie, phd!
Mariam Aly @mariamaly.bsky.social · 08/03/2025
I am loving all the protest pictures but please be mindful of sharing photos with others’ faces, given known threats to international students who attend protests.
45613
Reposted by katie, phd!
Sam Wang @samwang.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
Close to 600 people for the Trenton Stand Up For Science rally. Great chants, NJ schools out in force, and scientists discovering their inner extrovert. Rush Holt led off, me at end.
219945
Reposted by katie, phd!
Marisa Kabas @marisakabas.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
The National Cancer Institute (part of NIH) released new guidelines for "controversial, high-profile or sensitive" keywords that require "review prior to publication" if included in a product or materials. Keywords include abortion, obesity, and peanut allergies.
Materials produced or authored by NCI staff that address topics that may be controversial, high profile, or sensitive must be sent to the NCI Clearance Team for review prior to publication.

Depending on the nature of the information, additional review and clearance by the NCI director, deputy directors, NIH, and HHS may be required. In some cases, the material will not need further review, but the NCI Clearance Team will share it with NCI leadership, NIH, and/or HHS for their awareness.

Examples of controversial or high-profile topics include, but are not limited to:

Cancer Moonshot
NCI budget
COVID-19
Vaccines
H5N1/bird flu
Opioids ,
Marijuana
Dietary guidelines/ultra-processed foods
Obesity
Stem cell or fetal tissue research
Abortion
Autism
Peanut allergies
Fluoride
Measles
Diversity/equity efforts
Gender ideology
Environmental justice
Discussion of federal policies
Topics of federal investigations
Issues concerning pending legislation
Topics that have received recent attention from Congress
Topics that have received widespread or critical media attention
39439031630
Reposted by katie, phd!
🇵🇸Martin “Doomsday” Pfeiffer🖖🏳️‍🌈 @nuclearanthro.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
“fluoride” “measles” “covid-19” “vaccines” Holy fuck this is uh quite an overt example of politics actively hamstringing science in ways that will make us all less safe.
79736
Reposted by katie, phd!
Oliver lab @lymphaticsprox1.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
Despite the weather the Chicago scientific community (including prospective young PhD students) gathered today to Stand UP for Science and show that science is for everyone and that NIH support is critical to keep labs running.
0174
Reposted by katie, phd!
500 Women Scientists @500womensci.bsky.social · 18/02/2025
For state-specific NIH info cards, find your state here: bit.ly/NIH_bystate
11910
Reposted by katie, phd!
Anna Kornbluh @annakornbluh.bsky.social · 05/03/2025
make flyers of the first two paragraphs of this just filed lawsuit, and give them to your neighbors, leave them under t*sla wipers, in little free libraries, at the grocery store (thank you to the plaintiffs)
0166
Reposted by katie, phd!
Jordan Collver @jordancollver.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
This thread really goes places.
Emoji of a robot cup of coffee
0101
Reposted by katie, phd!
Robert Evans (the Only Robert Evans) @iwriteok.bsky.social · 17/02/2025
so special ed programs are getting gutted because their internal documentation used the term "transition" when talking about helping disabled kids enter the working world. they're literally striking at that word wherever they see it.
381109563502
Reposted by katie, phd!
Alt National Park Service @altnps.bsky.social · 16/02/2025
Letters went out to federal workers this morning stating they were fired due to poor performance. However, all employees had been rated as “exceptional” performers by their supervisors. Please keep these records and pursue wrongful termination claims. Let the lawsuits begin.
9466361915062
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 16/02/2025
i'm nearing the end of my PhD, and will be graduating this summer. I'm starting to write the introduction of my thesis and I'm getting emotional over how much I've learned and grown intellectually over these last 6 years. This type of writing would've been impossible to first-year katie. I'm proud!
030
Reposted by katie, phd!
Audrey Drotos, PhD 🧠 🔬 @audreydrotos.bsky.social · 12/02/2025
The Pennsylvania Attorney General has not joined the lawsuit against the NIH indirect cap, which means Penn and all other universities are suffering a massive funding cut. You can contact our AG here and request he join the suit: www.attorneygeneral.gov/contact/
attorneygeneral.gov
Contact
0175
Reposted by katie, phd!
Bita Moghaddam @bita137.bsky.social · 11/02/2025
Many in biotech/private sector are boasting about their ways of funding and doing science But they are staffed with PhDs and postdocs we train in our NIH and NSF funded labs in universities With university labs lacking funds to train, the private sector will be profoundly harmed
11401108
Reposted by katie, phd!
Society for Neuroscience @sfn.org · 11/02/2025
The NIH’s new imposed standard indirect cost rate threatens life-saving brain & behavior research that benefits millions of Americans. SfN, with other scientific organizations,urge reversal of this policy & implore Congress to protect critical research infrastructure. Full statement: bit.ly/4jVJnCL
bit.ly
Statement on the NIH Imposed Standard Indirect Cost Rate
114971
Reposted by katie, phd!
jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 11/02/2025
in what meaningful way can we say that the constitution is in effect when an unelected and unaccountable billionaire is wielding state power to unilaterally cancel congressional appropriations?
467243296364
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 11/02/2025
yes! please share widely!
010
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
5/5 And thanks @laurakwhite.bsky.social for the amazing presentation, and this list of action items.
And in the longer term, people will stop pursuing PhDs and other research-based degrees or positions. Universities research revenue will plummet, which they will have to make up for. This could lead to tuition increases. Education in the US will become increasingly expensive, and therefore increasingly inaccessible. Great scientists will migrate away from the US, which will no longer be the research capital of the world.NIH funded research makes America great. What action can you take this week to stand up for science? 
Can you call your representatives? Look then up at reps.fyi
Are you part of a union? Can you be? 
Do you have a contact with local media?
Can you educate others?
Can you connect with organizers for state capitol or DC-based protests in support of science funding on March 7? (see @cdelawalla.bsky.social)
Can you volunteer your graphic design or data analysis skills to those doing outreach? 
Can you share with your students? 
Do you know any generous billionaires?

This list is taken from Laura White's presentation, The War On Science (@laurakwhite.bsky.social)
110
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
4/5
This change will devastate biomedical research in the United States of America.Here's what that will look like in the immediate term. Your loved ones enrolled in clinical trials to treat their cancers, mental health crises, and other ailments will lose their treatment. Hundreds of thousands of University employees will lose their jobs. Drug development in the US will slow to a crawl, and currently untreatable diseases will remain that way. University-affiliated hospitals and medical centers will have to significantly reduce capacity, and you may be refused care.
100
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
3/5
While it is difficult to quantify exactly who is spending the indirect costs, and how they contribute to research, everyone agrees that they serve an essential purpose: allowing researchers to focus on their research, because the institution will handle the rest. Paying the water bill means I can dilute my samples, AND wash my hands in the bathroom. Paying for electricity means I can power the microscope, AND the kettle in the kitchenette. Paying the custodial staff helps keep everyone's research area clean and safe.On Friday, February 7th, 2025, the US government capped the indirect cost rate at a maximum of 15% for all institutions receiving NIH funding, effective immediately upon start of business Monday. This equates to a loss of hundreds of millions of dollars for most top research institutions in the US.
110
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
2/5
What do NIH funds pay for? 1. Direct costs - a portion of the money goes to the applicant, called the Principal Investigator, for costs directly associated with performing the research. For example, buying equipment, purchasing reagents, traveling to conferences, paying publishing fees. 2. Indirect costs - another portion goes to the institution, to cover expenses not directly related to the proposed research, yet still crucial to getting the work done. For example, paying electricity bills, controlled substances regulation, safety compliance, hazardous chemical management, equipment maintenance.Indirect  cost rates are carefully negotiated between the NIH and the institutions, and the average indirect cost rate is around 30%. So, at an average university, if $100,000 goes to the Principal Investigator via Direct Costs, then an additional $30,000 goes to the institution via Indirect Costs. Institutions with greater research activity will have a greater indirect cost rate. Harvard University has a 69% indirect cost rate. So if $100,000 goes to the Principal Investigator via Direct Costs, then an additional $69,000 goes to Harvard University via Indirect Costs. University of Michigan has a 56% indirect cost rate. So if $100,000 foes to the Principal Investigator via Direct Costs, then an additional $56,000 goes to the University of Michigan via Indirect costs.
120
Reposted by katie, phd!
Bita Moghaddam @bita137.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
If you are a NIH funded researcher and your state is not on this list, you need to be calling your AG office
419896
Reposted by katie, phd!
Jesse O'Lantern, LGPC @jesseberney.com · 10/02/2025
this agency is for protecting consumers from predatory financial companies you are a consumer financial companies prey on you they are shutting it down because they hate you
3348141
Reposted by katie, phd!
Heather Thomas @heatherthomasaf.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
429291617767
Reposted by katie, phd!
Neil Lewis, Jr. @neillewisjr.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
Yea...this is one of those times when, if leaders are going to speak up, they need to differentiate their communication strategy by audience. Internally (students, faculty, staff, alumni), effects on the university matters. Externally, focus on the bigger picture. One message will not fit all.
523646
Reposted by katie, phd!
Ardem Patapoutian @ardemp.bskyverified.social · 10/02/2025
Read the 🧵 on the 2025 plan for the NIH: the proposal suggests dismantling the agency and redistributing its funding to the states.
12410
Reposted by katie, phd!
Laura White @laurakwhite.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
Made some slides for scientists to talk about what's been happening & what we should do next. There are probably many people better qualified than me to talk about these issues. If that's you, please, please, please consider holding some virtual advocacy training sessions for researchers this week.
docs.google.com
The War on Science (Feb 2025 teach-in draft)
The War on Science What’s happening? What can we do about it? An interactive teach-in for biomedical researchers Please share, modify, and repurpose this template presentation (with credit). Good luck...
17237135
Reposted by katie, phd!
Charlotte Cavaille @ccavaille.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
This event is happening this Wednesday at the #Umich Ann Arbor campus, come and please share!
19236
Reposted by katie, phd!
Daniel Gorelick @danielgorelick.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
Trainees who applied for an NIH diversity fellowship whose applications were withdrawn/not being reviewed, there's a NYTimes reporter who wants to talk, especially interested in applicants with disabilities. DM me & I'll put you in touch, will keep all contact confidential. Please amplify
8210191
Reposted by katie, phd!
Ted Price @tedpricethepainguy.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
100%. You never know where the next great discovery that will change all of our lives will originate. This is why we trust scientists to carefully review each others work and ideas and give advice on how to make basic research investments.
0164
Reposted by katie, phd!
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 08/02/2025
More inside baseball about how overhead rates are determined from former NIGMS head Jeremy Berg. 🧵 bsky.app/profile/jere...
10918102
Reposted by katie, phd!
gardenpeach.bsky.social @gardenpeach.bsky.social · 08/02/2025
If the local large university goes down, that's a main provider of health care services. The community college health care education programs depend on the big U medical center. Nurses, x ray techs, so many health care workers get their start in these programs.
21169
katie, phd! @sciencekatie.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
if we keep the lights turned off in the lab bay how much will we save in indirects /s
110
Reposted by katie, phd!
The Allard lab @allard-lab-ucla.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
1/3 Why does the US lead the world in the number of clinical trials? How come americans are given the unique chance to get the latest treatment and a fighting chance against often incurable diseases? That's all thanks to research and the support from the NIH!
13712
Reposted by katie, phd!
PROFS @profsuwmadison.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
UW-Madison on proposed NIH indirect cost cap: “This proposed change to NIH funding–UW–Madison’s largest source of federal support–will significantly disrupt vital research activity and delay lifesaving discoveries and cures related to cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, and much more.” 1/x
news.wisc.edu
UW–Madison responds to NIH announcement about indirect cost cap
The following statement is in response to the federal directive issued on February 7, 2025 to change the Facilities and Administration (F&A) rate for all existing and ongoing new National Institutes o...
313372
Reposted by katie, phd!
Londyn Robinson, MD @londyloo.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
I have a confession . . . I was an “overhead cost”. I was a beaker washer, agar plate pourer, research secretary. I was paid by “overhead cost” fees. Loved it. Those “overhead cost” jobs allowed this rural kid to become a physician. Please tag how #OverheadCostJob impact u.
282814513
Reposted by katie, phd!
Jonathan Kagan @jkagan1.bsky.social · 08/02/2025
This is a list of blockbuster drugs in 2024. Guess how many can trace their origins to NIH funded research? All of them.
10583273
Reposted by katie, phd!
Megan Ranney MD MPH @meganranney.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
My 8th grade history teacher did this too. One of my classmates started crying. It has stuck with me my whole life
632488
Reposted by katie, phd!
CupcakeKitty @cupcakekitty09.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
Most people don’t know how fast this money channels through these research organizations. What comes in immediately pays for services to improve your/the world’s lives. This is not discretionary money.They’ll be in arrears within days.
0243
Reposted by katie, phd!
Dave Levitan @davelevitan.bsky.social · 08/02/2025
Look I don’t know how it will shake out but there are major medical centers and research institutes across the country currently trying to figure out if they have enough money to keep operating after the NIH indirect costs directive.
451249295