Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 02/10/2026Sorry to read this but thanks for providing such extensive and excellent coverage over many years. 010
Reposted by Robert KileyPublish-Review-Curate (PRC) Alliance @prcalliance.bsky.social · 14/09/2026The researchers adopting the Publish, Review, Curate model understand the importance of peer review. During this #PeerReviewWeek, we celebrate reviewers and the work they do. Let’s give them the credit they deserve by making the review process transparent and reviews publicly available! 055
Reposted by Robert KileyPublish-Review-Curate (PRC) Alliance @prcalliance.bsky.social · 24/08/2026At the end of October, we will be launching the PRC Alliance to bring together like-minded organizations, share knowledge, and accelerate the adoption of the PRC model.🤝 Follow us to learn more! More about the PRC model and the PRC Alliance👇 publish-review-curate.org/what-is-publ...publish-review-curate.orgWhat is PRC?The Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) model re-imagines scholarly publishing by breaking the traditional publishing process into three distinct, independently executable stages: publish, review, and cu… 055
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 26/06/2026An update on our plans to establish the PRC Alliance which will seek to raise the visibility and status of the Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) model and facilitate greater coordination across the diverse PRC community. publish-review-curate.org/2026/06/22/p... #AcademicPublishingpublish-review-curate.orgPRC Alliance: an updateFollowing the meeting in December 2025 to discuss the Publish Review, Curate (PRC) model of publishing, we announced our ambition to establish a PRC Alliance. Its purpose is to help accelerat… 031
Reposted by Robert KileyJeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 22/05/2026U.S. science agencies are forecast to pay more for #openaccess publication of journal articles. Are they ready? And is the author-pays business model sustainable? A GAO report draws criticism. #scholcomm @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...science.orgU.S. agencies aren’t ready for the rising cost of making research papers free, report warnsScience agencies could soon face nearly $1 billion publishing bill, Congressional analysts find 1199
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 10/03/2026Such sad news. I have many fond memories of talking about open access and open data with Phil when he was at the NIH. 010
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 10/03/2026You might find this helpful www.inra.ai/blog/ai-hall...inra.aiAI Hallucinations in Research: What They Are & How to StopWhy do AI tools make up citations? Learn causes, real examples (ChatGPT: 55%, Elicit: 17-33%), and how INRA's validation prevents fabricated references. 200
Reposted by Robert KileyJeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 07/03/2026#preprints are seen as accelerating science – but do they accelerate #researchcareers? @science.org @sciencecareers.bsky.social #scientificpublishing #scicomm www.science.org/content/arti...science.orgCareer effects of preprints get mixed reviews from biomedical researchersJunior researchers are more likely to embrace preprints; grant reviewers and hiring committees express doubts 0134
Reposted by Robert KileyinfoDOCKET @infodocket.bsky.social · 17/02/2026COAR Notify and the Launch of a Publish, Review, Curate Alliance (via @coar-repositories.bsky.social) coar-repositories.org/news-updates... #scholcomm #repositories #libraries #oa 001
Reposted by Robert KileyinfoDOCKET @infodocket.bsky.social · 15/12/2025ICYMI NIH’s Proposed Caps on Open-Access #Publishing Fees Roil Scientific Community (via @science.org) www.science.org/content/arti... #scholcomm #oa 002
Reposted by Robert KileyJulian Winn @winn-on-health.bsky.social · 14/12/2025"There has been pressure from universities for the new agreements to make further progress away from traditional subscription models of publishing and towards open access" #AcademicPublishing #OpenAccess #KnowledgeShare share.google/7sI8E7bV4ZuH...share.googleUK university sector reaches deals with four major publishers - Research Professional NewsElsevier, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis and Wiley meet “sector-agreed thresholds” in long-running talks 001
Reposted by Robert KileyDorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 08/12/2025Springer Nature retracting papers based on bonkers dataset www.thetransmitter.org/retraction/e... Good. #autismthetransmitter.orgSpringer Nature retracts, removes nearly 40 publicationsThe dataset contains images of children’s faces downloaded from websites about autism, which sparked concerns at Springer Nature about consent and reliability. 311250
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 11/12/2025Summary of recent meeting to discuss the Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) publishing model. To build on this momentum @coar-repositories.bsky.social & @asapbio.bsky.social will convene a working group to explore establishing a PRC Alliance coar-repositories.org/news-updates... #scientificpublishingcoar-repositories.orgReimagining scholarly publishing: outcomes from a public forum to discuss the Publish, Review, Curate publishing modelPhoto: PRC supporters’ workshop At a meeting held on the 3rd December 2025 at Kings College, Cambridge over 50 delegates, comprising researchers, publishers, librarians, research funders and … 011
Reposted by Robert KileyCOAR - Confederation of Open Access Repositories @coar-repositories.bsky.social · 27/11/2025Our public forum at University of Cambridge is officially *sold out* Looking forward to interesting discussions around the future of publishing with @ludowaltman.bsky.social and others @peercommunityin.bsky.social @elife.bsky.social @metaror.bsky.social - coar-repositories.org/news-updates...coar-repositories.orgPublish, Review, Curate: Turning scholarly publishing on its headTired of long delays, expensive fees, and a lack of transparency about editorial decisions when publishing your articles? Join us at King’s College, Cambridge on December 3rd for an in-depth … 042
Reposted by Robert KileyDelta Think @deltathink.bsky.social · 28/11/2025"... the recent deployment of open scholarship to train large language models has led to disquiet among both open-access advocates and detractors." #ScholComm #Research #Scholarship #AI #LLMs #Copyright #UnintendedConsequences 001
Reposted by Robert KileyJeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 12/11/2025A sequel to #Plan_S -- the carrot, not the stick. Will that approach improve what ails #scientificpublishing? #ScholarlyComm #openaccess @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...science.orgAfter Coalition S disrupted scientific publishing, new plan retreats from strict requirementsThe group’s latest strategy emphasizes consultation, lacks spending pledges 032
Reposted by Robert KileySamuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 05/11/2025Newly released Stockholm Declaration recommends the following reforms to publishing: 1. Academia resumes control of publishing 2. Incentive systems to merit quality, not quantity 3. Independent fraud detection and prevention 4. Legislation and policies to protect science quality and integrityroyalsocietypublishing.orgReformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration | Royal Society Open ScienceScience relies on integrity and trustworthiness. But scientists under career pressure are lured to purchase fake publications from ‘paper mills’ that use AI-generated data, text and image fabrication.... 06932
Reposted by Robert KileycOAlition S @coalitions-oa.bsky.social · 22/10/2025Should publishers charge authors fees for exercising a right they already have? Here’s why the new fees from IEEE & @acs.org miss the mark and what could replace them. By @bodorama.bsky.social & @rachelbruce.bsky.social www.coalition-s.org/blog/yes-to-... #OpenAccess #OAweek #ScholComm 033
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 07/09/2025Martin, sorry to hear this. Hope you soon feel better. 110
Reposted by Robert Kiley LSE Impact @lseimpactblog.bsky.social · 19/08/2025👀 ICYMI: "in today’s rapidly changing landscape of scientific communication, the decision feels less like a visionary leap and more like an uninspired nod to the status quo" #Nature #PeerReview #ScholCommblogs.lse.ac.ukNature’s decision to publish positive peer review reports only gives half the picture - Impact of Social SciencesAs the journal Nature moves to publish peer review reports for accepted papers, Bodo Stern argues this partial openness falls short of true transparency. 024
Reposted by Robert KileyJeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 05/08/2025Can authors afford APCs for #openaccess publishing if NIH caps its payments for them? Institutional read-and-publish deals offer an APC-free alternative, but NIH also wants to lower the indirect cost rate to 15%, which could squeeze money for such deals. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...science.orgNIH details options for limiting its payments for open-access publishing feesOther publishing proposals would scrap reimbursements or pay peer reviewers, unprecedented steps for a major government funder 2157
Reposted by Robert KileyDorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 31/07/2025Here's a quick blogpost about alternative publishing models. You can bring a horse to water, and indeed wave the bucket temptingly under its nose, but it is likely to gallop off elsewhere. deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/07/new-... @ec.europa.eu @wellcometrust.bsky.socialdeevybee.blogspot.comNew publishing models will only work if authors embrace themComplaints about the broken academic publishing system have been around for years and are getting louder. A common theme is that with the r... 109336
Reposted by Robert KileyFORM @forumforopen.bsky.social · 25/07/20251️⃣ From @timeshighered.bsky.social: The UK is calling for a fundamental shift in how to fund & structure #AcademicPublishing, breaking the link between publisher profits & article volume. A powerful case for thinking #OpenAccess at scale 🔗Read more: shorturl.at/PbFRishorturl.atWe must break the link between publisher revenue and article volumeVolume-driven publishing pushes up costs and threatens research integrity. We need new agreements with healthier incentives, says Anna Vernon 101
Reposted by Robert KileyNews Analysis @newsanalysis.com · 14/07/2025New study reveals concerns over scientific paper quality due to overwhelming publication volume. A retracted paper with AI-generated errors highlights the issue. Royal Society to review publishing. #ScientificPublishing #Newstheguardian.comQuality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions publishedNew study reveals concerns over scientific paper quality due to overwhelming publication volume. A ... 001
Reposted by Robert KileycOAlition S @coalitions-oa.bsky.social · 29/05/2025After a successful period leading our strategic direction, @rkiley.bsky.social concludes his role as cOAlition S Head of Strategy in June. 📰 www.coalition-s.org/coalition-s-... 231
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 22/05/2025Around 82% of research attributed to a cOAlition S funder is published open access; the comparable global OA figure is 53% 010
Reposted by Robert KileycOAlition S @coalitions-oa.bsky.social · 22/05/2025📙The @coalitions-oa.bsky.social Annual Review 2024 is out, providing an overview of policy progress, tools, services, and ongoing initiatives that aim to make scholarly communication more open and accessible. Read it here: 🔓 www.coalition-s.org/plan-s-annua... #Plan_S #OpenAccess #scholcomm 195
Reposted by Robert KileycOAlition S @coalitions-oa.bsky.social · 14/05/2025📢 Just released: Updated "How Equitable Is It?" tool with clearer definitions for assessing #equity in #ScholComm models. 👉 coalitions.typeform.com/Equity-Tool 📰 www.coalition-s.org/updated-vers... By the beyond article-based charges working group, cOAlition S, @jisc.bsky.social, @plos.orgcoalitions.typeform.comHow Equitable Is It?A framework for assessing scholarly communication models on the axis of equity. Developed by the “Beyond article-based charges” working group, which is convened by cOAlition S, Jisc and PLOS. 096
Reposted by Robert KileyopenRxiv @openrxiv.bsky.social · 11/03/2025openRxiv has arrived! We’re thrilled to announce the launch of openRxiv as an independent, researcher-led nonprofit to oversee bioRxiv and medRxiv, the world’s leading preprint servers for life and health sciences. openrxiv.org/introducing-... #openRxiv #OpenScience #Preprints #bioRxiv #medRxiv 3409231
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 04/03/2025“I will be resigning my position as associate editor at the Royal Society’s journal Open Science with immediate effect. I will no longer submit my research to Royal Society journals or act as a peer reviewer for them. I would urge my colleagues to do the same” www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...theguardian.comElon Musk is a proven danger to good science, but the Royal Society won’t say so. That’s why I resigned | Kit YatesIt is vital to act, and I urge colleagues to do so. How can we stand by and laud this man while he undermines scientific integrity? asks academic and author Kit Yates 021
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 22/02/2025PLOS statement on recent US Executive Orders and scientific integrity theplosblog.plos.org/2025/02/plos... #scientificpublishingtheplosblog.plos.orgPLOS statement on recent US Executive Orders and scientific integrity - The Official PLOS BlogSince its founding over twenty five years ago PLOS has been dedicated to advancing open science, ensuring that knowledge is accessible to… 060
Reposted by Robert Kileypetersuber @petersuber.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy · 14/02/2025Update. From @hildabast: "What if We Can’t Rely on PubMed?" absolutelymaybe.plos.org/2025/02/14… "#PubMed is incredibly reliable…That said, between the risks of an exodus of key personnel, understaffing, or goodness-knows-what vandalism when a goon squad […]fediscience.orgOriginal post on fediscience.org 104
Reposted by Robert KileyDorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 12/02/2025Latest blogpost on Musk/Royal Society debacle: deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/02/seve... I look at the reasons that have been given for inaction, and find them wanting. @royalsociety.orgdeevybee.blogspot.comSeven reasons for keeping Elon Musk as a Fellow of the Royal SocietyLast November, I wrote a blogpost explaining why I had resigned as a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS). In brief, over the summer a group ... 26455223
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 24/01/2025Thanks. Has this event happened? I can just see an image, which isn’t clickable. 100
Reposted by Robert KileycOAlition S @coalitions-oa.bsky.social · 23/01/2025When researchers can’t afford to publish or access research, science loses vital perspectives. 📽️Watch how the #EquitablePricing Framework, developed by #informationpower for @cOAlitionS_OA, can make #ScholComm more accessible & equitable for researchers worldwide. #OpenAccess #OpenScience 162
Reposted by Robert KileyRebecca Lawrence @rnls.bsky.social · 14/01/2025Innovation in scholarly comms & uptake of new models are hampered by scholarly infrastructures continuing to use increasingly outdated approaches. This collectively authored piece recommends 4 criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases upstream.force11.org/criteria-for...upstream.force11.orgCriteria for Bibliographic Databases in a Well-Functioning Scholarly Communication and Research Assessment EcosystemBibliographic databases should support innovation and experimentation. Here, we offer four criteria for innovation-friendly bibliographic databases. We urge the global research community to use databa... 195
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 10/01/2025The @wellcometrust.bsky.social update their #openaccess policy making it clear that their funding can no longer be used to support APCs for journals that are part of Jisc-approved transformative agreements. See: wellcome.org/grant-fundin...wellcome.orgOpen access funding | WellcomeWellcome-funded researchers can access funds to cover open access publishing costs for research papers. 064
Reposted by Robert KileyCharley Rosenblum @chasrosenblum.bsky.social · 07/01/2025 Between predatory publications and preprints with no subsequent journal publication, there is a lot of dross out there the general public cannot fully put into context. #AcademicPublishingscience.orgPreprints often make news. Many people don’t know what they areThe public needs context about unreviewed manuscripts, survey suggests 131
Reposted by Robert KileyIlya Kashnitsky @ikashnitsky.phd · 07/01/2025A very thoughtful essay on the urgent need to start recognizing the crucial role peer-reviewers in the process of knowledge generation 🧐 📝 @cbo.bsky.social #OpenScience #AcademicSky #ScientificPublishing undark.org/2024/07/04/o...undark.orgThe Misplaced Incentives in Academic PublishingOpinion | Scientists who spend time peer-reviewing manuscripts don’t get rewarded for their efforts. It’s time to change that. 1153
Reposted by Robert KileySamuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 17/12/2024'Upon accepting NIH funding, recipients grant to NIH the right to make Author Accepted Manuscripts resulting from the funding publicly available in PubMed Central upon the Official Date of Publication' Rights retention baked into the new US federal OA policy. grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...grants.nih.govNOT-OD-25-049: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Public Access Policy: Government Use License and RightsNIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Public Access Policy: Government Use License and Rights NOT-OD-25-049. OD 84919
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 11/12/2024At the @boilerroom-tv.bsky.social Guildford, looking forward to seeing @GracePetrie. 000
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 11/12/2024Fully agree. 16 sunsets is as good as 13 minutes to the moon (which was brilliant) 010
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 06/12/2024India’s One Nation One Subscription deal enriches publishers and benefits few The yearly fee of $241m to access 13k journals is high, but access is also restricted to researchers, when the ambition was to give access to every individual in India #openaccess See: blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...blogs.lse.ac.ukIndia’s One Nation One Subscription deal enriches publishers and benefits fewContrary to its intended goals of reducing subscription costs and improving access to scientific literature in India, Muthu Madhan argues the much-hyped One Nation One Subscription policy risks sig… 042
Reposted by Robert KileyKim Eggleton @eggletonkim.bsky.social · 04/12/2024I cannot shout this loud enough - WE NEED IDENTITY CERTIFICATION IN SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 1297
Reposted by Robert KileyT R Shankar Raman (has moved) @mizoraman.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy · 30/11/2024The #Indian government's One Nation One Subscription #ONOS plan fails to address the problems of scholarly publishing and represents a half-baked plan at best. Also does nothing to get rid of the evils of commercial #sciencepublishing. Edit in The Hindu […]thehindu.comONOS bitten: On India’s ‘One Nation, One Subscription’ planThe government’s justification for adopting the ONOS strategy in its present form is weak, and any celebration of ONOS will have to be deemed premature 001
Reposted by Robert KileycOAlition S @coalitions-oa.bsky.social · 28/11/2024How does Web of Science's decision to stop indexing @elife.bsky.social work against the interest of science? Bodo Stern, Chief of Strategic Initiatives at @hhmi.bsky.social, explains: ✍️ coalition-s.org/blog/how-the... #ScholComm #OpenScience #OpenAccess 189
Robert Kiley @rkiley.bsky.social · 28/11/2024How the Web of Science takes a step back Great post by Bodo Stern, @hhmi.bsky.social on the how Clarivate’s decision to stop indexing @elife.bsky.social articles works against the interest of science. www.coalition-s.org/blog/how-the... #openaccess #openscience @coalitions-oa@bsky.socialcoalition-s.orgHow the Web of Science takes a step back<p>The Web of Science, a major commercial indexing service of scientific journals operated by Clarivate, recently announced that it had decided to stop indexing articles from the open access journal e... 020
Reposted by Robert KileyPascal @pascaliensis.bsky.social · 28/11/2024“Our entire epistemology of science and research relies on the chain of footnotes.” 0115