Sign in

Peter McLaughlin

@pmclaughlin44.bsky.social
75 followers 58 following 1 posts

Political Science PhD student at University of Oklahoma. Carl Albert Center Graduate Fellow. petermcla.com/home

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Matthew Geras @matthewgeras.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
@pmclaughlin44.bsky.social and I examine public opinion of candidates using campaign funds for childcare. Based on a survey experiment, we argue the policy of allowing parents, particularly mothers, to use campaign funds to pay for childcare may reduce the gender gap in political representation.
022
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR @cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 13/11/2025
#OpenAccess from @politicsgenderj.bsky.social - How Do US Voters Respond to Candidates Using Campaign Funds for Childcare? Evidence From a Framing Experiment - cup.org/47N4Fxe - Matthew J. Geras & @pmclaughlin44.bsky.social #FirstView
Logo of "Politics & Gender" in white text on a dark blue background, with a yellow vertical stripe on the left side, and the hashtag "#OpenAccess" in white at the bottom.
013
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Politics & Gender @politicsgenderj.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
📣 Out on #FirstView 📣 In "How do US Voters Respond to Candidates Using Campaign Funds for Childcare?", @matthewgeras.bsky.social and @pmclaughlin44.bsky.social use a framing experiment to assess the politics of parenthood in campaigning in 🇺🇸. 🌟Available #OpenAccess🌟 buff.ly/uDpfP7n
Research article titled "How Do US Voters Respond to Candidates Using Campaign Funds for Childcare? Evidence from a Framing Experiment" by Matthew J. Geras and Peter McLaughlin.
031
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Rachel Porter @rachelporter.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
Political inexperience in Congress has measurable effects on legislative outcomes. Our research finds that when districts elect political newcomers over career politicians, congressional dysfunction tends to increase. New explainer of our PNAS study: theconversation.com/amateur-hour...
theconversation.com
Amateur hour in Congress: How political newcomers fuel gridlock and government shutdowns
The public’s frustration with ‘politics as usual’ has led more political newcomers to win office. But amateurs are more likely to view bipartisanship as a concession, not a tool for advancing policy.
55522
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Jacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
Federal spending is *up* under Trump according to the Wall Street Journal. Chaos is not actually the same as cost savings. Actual budgeting is a kind of actual policy-making and takes real work spread over real time. Running around breaking stuff isn't that. www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
13053282081
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Vincent Arel-Bundock @vincentab.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
📚😅🎉 Yay!! I just submitted the complete manuscript of my upcoming book to the publisher! Learn to easily and clearly interpret (almost) any stats model w/ R or Python. Simple ideas, consistent workflow, powerful tools, detailed case studies. Read it for free @ marginaleffects.com #RStats #PyData
Model to Meaning: How to interpret statistical models with marginaleffects for R and Python
21596148
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
E.J. Fagan @ejfagan.com · 09/04/2025
Authoritarians struggle to make effective policy in part because they have a bottleneck of attention. If no one but the king can make decisions, every decision must wait in line. Meanwhile, things get missed and errors accumulate.
politico.com
‘We are all waiting for a reply.’ Countries say White House hasn’t responded on tariff talks.
The lack of engagement is one signal the White House is still far from reaching substantive trade deals ahead of the midnight deadline for stepped-up global tariffs to kick in.
51896265
Peter McLaughlin @pmclaughlin44.bsky.social · 07/04/2025
Thank you Mike! And congrats to Nathan!!!
010
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Andrew Heiss @andrew.heiss.phd · 07/04/2025
This is a fantastic list of papers on properly dealing with control variables (and other related methodological issues) in social science (and #polisky specifically)! I put it all in a public Zotero group library here www.zotero.org/groups/59433...
zotero.org
812926
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Brendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 30/03/2025
Really cool datasets and accompanying papers The National Elections Database www.nationalelectionsdatabase.com Paper: academic.oup.com/restud/advan... Digitally Accountable Public Representation (social media posts of US officeholders 2020-2024) sites.psu.edu/dapr/ Paper: osf.io/preprints/os...
35411
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 28/03/2025
NEW: Friends of Neri Alvarado, rotting in a Salvadoran prison on Trump's orders, made a video highlighting his volunteer work helping neurodiverse children learn to swim. Neri was sent there after someone at ICE thought his autism awareness tattoo was a gang tattoo. Vid posted by Noah Lanard on X.
6031301557
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Adam Bonica @adambonica.bsky.social · 18/03/2025
2/🧵 Here is the breakdown by ideological groupings. While liberal judges heard more cases (due to geography and venue selection), the consistency of rulings across ideological lines demolishes the narrative that judicial decisions against Trump reflect political bias.
Second Image (Bar Chart)

Title: Percentage Ruling Against Trump by Judge Ideology
Description: A bar chart comparing the percentage of judges ruling against Trump across ideological groups.
	•	The x-axis categorizes judges as Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative.
	•	The y-axis represents the percentage of rulings against Trump, ranging from 0% to 100%.
	•	The three bars show similar rates of ruling against Trump:
	•	Liberal judges: 84% (27 out of 32)
	•	Centrist judges: 86% (6 out of 7)
	•	Conservative judges: 82% (9 out of 11)
	•	The chart suggests that ruling against Trump is relatively consistent across ideological lines.
101228288
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Dave Levitan @davelevitan.bsky.social · 08/03/2025
Mandatory high school civics class that isn’t just like “how a bill becomes law” or whatever but also “how NOAA powers your phone’s weather app” and “NIH helped make your asthma inhaler”
8341301005
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Jonathan Cohn @jonathancohn.bsky.social · 02/03/2025
The average American voter thinks that the government is too big but that it should spend more money on everything it does. This explains a decent share of the political chaos of this country.
1143417965
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Jon Green @jongreen.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
can't be stressed enough how stuff like this makes policymaking so much more difficult in the future. think you passed a bill appropriating funds over ten years? maybe you did, maybe you didn't!
29823
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
E.J. Fagan @ejfagan.com · 17/02/2025
I can't speak for others, but I used to be like this. One thing that the 6+ year grind to earn a PhD and develop real expertise on a subject gave me was a respect for others doing the hard work to develop domain-specific expertise.
0112
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
American Political Science Review @apsrjournal.bsky.social · 06/02/2025
From our new issue: "The Distributive Politics of Grants-in-Aid" by Leah Rosenstiel. #ASPRNewIssue www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ame…
053
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
E.J. Fagan @ejfagan.com · 23/01/2025
A great @psjeditor.bsky.social paper from Lewallen, Park and @seanmtheriault.bsky.social examines when members of Congress use hearings to grandstand. They find more grandstanding in solution (legislating) oriented hearings, with variation across topics. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...
186
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Matt Grossmann @mattgrossmann.bsky.social · 17/12/2024
New CongressData update with its r packages & web app: cspp.ippsr.msu.edu/congress/ We now have 1,000 variables at the district-member-year level, including 9 new data sources with area crosswalks, activist presence, primaries, environmental data, broadband, & legislative style
cspp.ippsr.msu.edu
CongressData
The CongressData Project aims to compile, disseminate, and encourage the use of data relevant to research of the US Congress and tracks member-level variables across the states across time. We have gathered more than 900 variables from various sources and assembled them into one large, useful dataset. We hope this project will become a 'one-stop shop' for academics, policy analysts, students, and researchers looking for variables germane to the study of the US Congress.
02813
Reposted by Peter McLaughlin
Politics & Gender @politicsgenderj.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
🏅In one of our most read articles this week - "More Money, Less Credit?" - @pmclaughlin44.bsky.social utilizes survey experiments to investigate potential gender bias in congressional credit claiming. Available 🌟 #OpenAccess 🌟 www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Screenshot of research article entitled "More Money, Less Credit? Legislator Gender and the Effectiveness of Congressional Credit Claiming" by Peter T. McLaughlin

Abstract
Bringing home federal spending projects to the district is a common reelection strategy for members of the U.S. Congress, and congresswomen tend to outperform congressmen in securing district spending. However, for legislators to turn distributive benefits into higher approval and electoral rewards, constituents must recognize that public spending has taken place in their community and attribute credit to the correct public official. I theorize that congresswomen face a gender bias when claiming credit for federal projects, and I test this theory through an online survey experiment. Contrary to expectations, I find no evidence that legislator gender influences the public’s reaction to congressional credit claims, indicating that congresswomen can effectively use distributive politics to counter gendered vulnerability in the U.S. Congress. This research advances the literature on gender and politics by investigating whether a gender bias in credit claiming prevents congresswomen from turning their representational efforts into electoral capital.
084