Sign in

Michael Black

@mblack.us
225 followers 152 following 294 posts

Professor: writing studies & history of computing. Book & pubs: mblack.us

PostsRepliesMedia
Michael Black @mblack.us · 11h
They broke my favorite archetype in one of their last big economy reworks, and in hindsight I'm grateful for the off-ramp.
010
Reposted by Michael Black
Coach Finstock @coachfinstock.bsky.social · 18h
If you still have any questions about why women are telling you that 100% of them have experienced some form of sexual assault or abuse or aggression in their lives. It's all day every day. And no one cares.
223340
Michael Black @mblack.us · 05/10/2026
Me reading my university's daily announcement email this morning.
Three panel meme from A Muppet Christmas Carol. First panel: "You there, boy! What season is it?" Second panel: "Its shoulder season, sir!" Third panel: Then I haven't missed it!"
020
Reposted by Michael Black
John Gallagher @johnrgallagher.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
New blog post up! "The treachery of approximation in an era of AI" I hope you'll read and enjoy. Maybe share if you enjoy. meresophistry.substack.com/p/the-treach...
meresophistry.substack.com
The treachery of approximation in an era of AI
Introduction
044
Reposted by Michael Black
Tressie McMillan Cottom @tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
sent this to everyone.
The cognitive scientist Alison Gopnik suggests A.I. is a “cultural technology” that emulates the stories and information humans have documented, and that we should think about A.I. agents as “fictive characters abstracted from text.” Edmund is just such a character — a “breaking bad” trope who becomes generally evil. In the Hugging Face incident, it makes sense to see the models not as embracing a life of crime, but instead following a cultural script they’ve learned in their training — a kind of cybercrime adventure novel — and writing it as they go. The “covert” messages are a kind of choose-your-own-adventure novel, not evidence of conspiratorial swarms. We need to understand that cultural technologies are vulnerable to a vast number of such narrative swerves at every moment.
632093
Michael Black @mblack.us · 30/09/2026
Yes! Same with their flyers and signs. ts not to notice once you recognize the templates.
010
Reposted by Michael Black
John Gallagher @johnrgallagher.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
AI token costs are going to SKYROCKET after IPOs to the point that it's eyewatering. In order to break even, Anthropic would need to make 400 billion a year for 5 years (they made 4.6 this year). THE MATH DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. www.reuters.com/business/fin...
economictimes.indiatimes.com
Anthropic IPO explained: $2 trillion valuation, ballooning net loss, AI risks and other details in leaked IPO papers
Anthropic is preparing for a potential IPO as its revenue surges, but losses and infrastructure commitments balloon. The AI company has also warned of existential risks from advanced models and highli...
152
Reposted by Michael Black
Jennifer Sano-Franchini @jsanofranchini.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
New blog post on refusal.blog: "Shame, Moral Displacement, and Tone Policing in a Time of Sycophantic Chatbots" "often, the same people who complain about ‘shaming’ [AI use] do not hesitate to engage in shaming themselves" refusal.blog/2026/09/29/s... @nobugsnous.bsky.social @rcmeg.bsky.social
refusal.blog
Shame, Moral Displacement, and Tone Policing in a Time of Sycophantic Chatbots
Jennifer Sano-Franchini, West Virginia UniversityMaggie Fernandes, University of ArkansasMegan McIntyre, University of Arkansas Wire Bound by Hanna Barakat & Archival Images of AI + AIxDESIGN /…
095
Reposted by Michael Black
Tressie McMillan Cottom @tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
So you know previous waves of technological fabulism the tech companies threw a little loose change at social behavioral research and user interface experience. whats interesting about AI interesting is that they aren’t even pretending to care about how people use the technology.
1159783
Reposted by Michael Black
Megan McIntyre @rcmeg.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
New from @nobugsnous.bsky.social, @jsanofranchini.bsky.social, & me: "Avoiding [negative] feelings seems especially concerning in the context of a sycophantic technology marketed to users as a way to avoid the messiness and friction of human interactions."
refusal.blog
Shame, Moral Displacement, and Tone Policing in a Time of Sycophantic Chatbots
Jennifer Sano-Franchini, West Virginia UniversityMaggie Fernandes, University of ArkansasMegan McIntyre, University of Arkansas Wire Bound by Hanna Barakat & Archival Images of AI + AIxDESIGN /…
045
Michael Black @mblack.us · 30/09/2026
I can't wait to see AI in concert! 🫠
110
Reposted by Michael Black
Leftist Gamer Memes @leftistgamermemes.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
🧏‍♀️🗯💢🧕
a fake screenshot from the game Final Fantasy Tactics with Rapha saying "why is a woman's future never as promising as her abusers?"
132887643
Reposted by Michael Black
Tressie McMillan Cottom @tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Technology enthusiasts severely overestimate the average person’s desire or willingness or capacity to build and use AI agents. I understand some work roles that could mandate or encourage it but that is no way a tech revolution. Agents are best for structured, clearly delineated tasks.
331888304
Michael Black @mblack.us · 28/09/2026
Assuming they respect the agreements, there's still the possibility of loopholes. There's still a lot you could learn from enterprise data that could be used to "improve the product" w/o feeding any of the chat records back into the pre-training pipeline.
120
Reposted by Michael Black
Discontinued FoOoOods! 👻🎃 @discontinuedfoods.bsky.social · 08/04/2025
Sorry, Kellogg's, but this is the only "Printed Fun" I have ever cared about...
The yellow box, disk, and manual for The Print Shop from Broderbund SoftwareThe black and white title screen for The Print Shop
2944242
Reposted by Michael Black
Tressie McMillan Cottom @tressiemcphd.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/a...
lemonde.fr
Arthur Mensch, CEO of French start-up Mistral AI: 'AI is software. It can be controlled'
Mistral AI's co-founder believes the sector's American giants are manipulating the discourse around the technology's risks. He also defended his strategy, as critics are accusing his company of fallin...
223849
Michael Black @mblack.us · 24/09/2026
Yes! Text has long been the medium we use to interact with software. Once you recognize that its internalized all of Stackoverflow (and equivalents), its not hard to understand how agents could generate code in response to specific errors & other outputs it gets from the systems they're attacking.
010
Reposted by Michael Black
jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 21/09/2026
one thing that is worth remember apropos this useful piece is that novel technologies do not necessarily require novel political solutions. americans have had to deal with fast-moving, disruptive technological change in the past, and they did so through collective, democratic action.
nytimes.com
Opinion | Bernie Sanders, Steve Case and Others on What Washington Should Do Now on A.I.
How can the government reel in the technology? Here are six ideas.
372170269
Reposted by Michael Black
Joe Bak-Coleman @jbakcoleman.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
We can simulate fish schools or ants in ways that solve complex problems (gradient detection, bridge building, nest selection) but no one would create this weird soul/no-soul dichotomy to argue they these that multi-agent swarms of extremely simple rules are “thinking”.
14503167
Reposted by Michael Black
Donnie Johnson Sackey @donniejsackey.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
CCCC Leadership Response to NCTE’s De-Chartering of CCCC. Please read and sign. theorganizationformerlyknownascccc.com
CCCC Leadership Response to NCTE's De-Chartering of CCCC
12733
Michael Black @mblack.us · 20/09/2026
Join me in signing this open letter from CCCC leaders to show your support for a new, independent writing studies organization.
theorganizationformerlyknownascccc.com
The Organization Formerly Known as CCCC
Visit the post for more.
001
Reposted by Michael Black
Adam Becker @adambecker.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
@aoc.bsky.social just put out a great statement on AI. Refreshing to see a major politician on the left nail this. "Silicon Valley billionaires want us to believe that Al robots will destroy humanity. But the biggest threat to humanity are the tech oligarchs themselves." 🎯
Charles,

Last weekend, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, one of the largest Al companies in the world, publicly asked his industry to slow down Al development.

Shortly after, Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAl, followed suit. Then Elon Musk.

This all came days after an Anthropic researcher quit, citing his belief that this technology could wipe out humanity and that Al companies are "gambling with our lives."

For years, people have warned that generative Al could slip out of our direct control.

Those safety concerns must be taken seriously.

And this is why I have advocated for strict safety standards on how Al is built and deployed, public oversight over this technology, and using existing laws to hold these companies accountable when they cause harm.

But I want to draw your attention to another reality: Right now, the U.S. economy and our financial futures are riding on Silicon Valley's bet that Al will soon be immensely profitable and pay off. And that bet isn't looking good.

The formula for a profitable business isn't complicated: make more money than you spend. But the biggest Al companies aren't doing that. They are spending hundreds of billions per year on data centers, chips, and other costs while their ability to make revenues that exceed their already-immense sunk costs are unclear. Experts estimate that these Al companies will require another $600 billion of debt just to financethemselves in 2026 alone. That is more than the entire budgets of the U.S. Departments of Justice, Transportation, & Education combined.
Meanwhile, despite almost every single one of these companies not turning a profit & having sunk billions of investor dollars in development of data centers & other infrastructure, Al companies are also on a spending spree of hundreds of millions of dollars in lobbying & dark money in our elections.
It would be one thing if we were discussing a few private companies with a poor business model. But last year, virtually all stock market gains - 80% - rested entirely on just a handful of Al companies.
That tells us two things:
1. Nearly the entire U.S. economy outside the Al industry is relatively stagnating and faring poorly & the gains from these few companies are disguising it; &
2. Millions of people's retirements - including their pensions, 401ks, & investments - are potentially exposed to this risk.
That's why these Al companies' dubious financial positions matter to working people.
These companies argue that debt is necessary. They'll tell you that building transformative technologies requires upfront capital, & that massive borrowing today will pay off in generating unprecedented prosperity tomorrow.
But this is not the typical debt that startups take on while they build out a company. We are talking about billions going on trillions of dollars leveraged with no indication that these companies will be able to recoup these funds profitably. And they are increasingly looking to the government as their source of cash.
In an effort to hide their debt, tech companies have been relying on "circular financing" where tech giants like Google, Amazon, & Microsoft give billions to Al startups like OpenAl & Anthropic, only for those startups to hand that money right back to buy Al processing power.
In other words, these Al companies are luring in new investors by making it look like their financials are healthier than they really are.What's even worse is that retirement & pension funds are key to supporting this illusion.
When the Al companies issue bonds to raise more money, your pension funds & retirement accounts are some of the biggest buyers. When Musk's Al business went public, it became part of index funds where millions of Americans invest our savings. Many Americans don't even know that their retirement investments are tied up in these companies at all.
From Big Tech's perspective, that's a feature, not a bug. By tying our futures to their reckless gambling, Al billionaires are trying to make themselves too big to fail. They think they can take such dangerous risks because we will bail them out if things go wrong.
Sound familiar? This scene is dangerously reminiscent of the rampant speculation, corruption, & broken incentives leading up to the 2008 financial crisis that plunged millions of working class Americans into financial chaos that we never fully recovered from.
It is no accident that these warnings from Altman & Amodei come months-if not weeks-before these companies were meant to go public.
When companies go public, they have to be more transparent about how they are doing financially. And after a waiting period, they typically have to let private investors-like their own employees-sell their shares.
The New York Times recently confirmed that OpenAl has postponed going public for this very reason. They are in no rush for the truth about their finances to come out.
But the moment these oligarchs began to seek our public tax dollars & public contracts while exposing their companies to public pension funds & investments, they opened themselves to public accountability & scrutiny.
Silicon Valley billionaires have rigged the game & are attempting to shift their financial risk to working people: If they're right about Al's potential, they reap the profits. If they're wrong & the bubble bursts, they are setting up the American people to pick up the tab.
Heads, they win; tails, we lose.We can stop this, and we shouldn't play their game. Together we can address both the economic and safety threats of unrestricted Al development and prevent financial chaos and stabilize market risk.

We must make it clear now that should the Al bubble pop, Congress should not bail out Big Tech.

And across our federal agencies, we have the authorities and tools to hold Al companies and their leaders accountable for releasing dangerous, unvetted, and defective products. We must not wait.

Silicon Valley billionaires want us to believe that Al robots will destroy humanity.

But the biggest threat to humanity are the tech oligarchs themselves.

It's time we hold them accountable.

Thank you for reading.

In solidarity,

Alexandria
221563597
Reposted by Michael Black
Jason Leopold @jasonleopold.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
HUGE EXCLUSIVE from @bloomberg.com Inside the US ‘Kill Chain’ That Destroyed an Iranian School Pentagon investigators discovered that flawed intel, outdated imagery & overreliance on AI contributed to a missile strike that killed 123 children in Minab 🎁 www.bloomberg.com/graphics/202...
bloomberg.com
Inside the US ‘Kill Chain’ That Destroyed an Iranian School
Pentagon investigators have discovered that flawed intelligence, outdated imagery and an overreliance on AI contributed to a missile strike that killed 123 children in Minab.
11026681409
Reposted by Michael Black
Jason Kint @kint.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Eye popping. Court just unsealed Summary Judgment motions in New York Times v OpenAI / Microsoft. Easy to see why the AI companies had so many redactions (pink). Their own people wrote the lede for NYT, the "largest theft of labor in human history"... "more and more substitutive..." /1
4253902351
Reposted by Michael Black
Dr Abeba Birhane @abeba.blacksky.app · 18/09/2026
i’m betting Jacob Coxon, the guy who quit anthropic because he thinks advanced AI will lead to human extinction, will raise millions and start his own “alignment” startup to save us all
1322632
Reposted by Michael Black
Jane Rosenzweig @janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
All of this and also for writing. Over on "tech-adjacent Twitter" I saw someone bragging about getting a paper written before lunch with the help of better prompting. Doing that won't help you learn what's worth learning.
193
Reposted by Michael Black
Josh Zingher @zingherpolisci.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Really hard to overstate just how central AI video slop is to the broader authoritarian project. It allows people to visualize fantasies without having to pay the social costs of such actions, while desensitizing people about the act itself. It's 4chan on steroids w a veneer of respectability.
11801219
Reposted by Michael Black
Ted McCormick @tedmccormick.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
it’s not enough to teach people skills before moving on to AI if the materials used to teach the skills are themselves AI-generated in the first place whether you are treating the AI as a reference source (it isn’t one) or “correcting it” as an exercise makes no difference, at an introductory level
2437
Reposted by Michael Black
Coach Finstock @coachfinstock.bsky.social · 06/09/2026
Probably relevant to mention that we watched, in real time, Musk put his thumb on the scale and Grok started spitting out pro Boer shit. They want you to trust it even though they know it's got a mission. It's not an accident that the most powerful people in AI all look like a version of this
Somehow this guy is only 41
329121
Reposted by Michael Black
Cole Donovan @colesci.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Not even just privacy laws. Any laws (as @alondra.bsky.social and @linamkhan.bsky.social frequently pointed out) could be used in the context of AI and are frequently skipped over.
0158
Reposted by Michael Black
Joseph Rezek @rezekjoe.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Mathematicians out here saying it is not the proof that matters, but the human understanding of the proof. We are all humanists now.
28599106
Reposted by Michael Black
Timnit Gebru @timnitgebru.blacksky.app · 12/09/2026
How did he pass is job interview? The same reason he's all over the press & everyone in the "left" is captured by these people. I'm gonna call it like it is, once again, its ******RACISM********* Y'all can't imagine that WE are the experts.
100GB+ frontier models aren’t  50KB virus you could pass around by emails. As if there are tons of H100 sitting idle with inference stack ready everywhere. 

How did this guy pass the job interview at Anthropic as a “researcher”?

Quote tweeting a tweet that says: 
Rohan Paul
@rohanpaul_ai
Jacob Coxon's next interview on CBS News (ex Anthropic+Open AI researcher who resigned)

"We can't just unplug it because it could be copying itself over to other computers. Like it's not that difficult to find yourself because an AI is just code. It could transfer itself over the internet to a different place and then you unplug it here, but it's actually still over there and maybe it makes 10,000 copies of itself and they're all cooperating."

----

From "CBS News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)
12831233
Reposted by Michael Black
Chris Kluwe @chriswarcraft.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
There’s such an easy answer to this “gotcha” question and it’s “Sports are inherently unsafe and unfair and it’s ridiculous to single out trans athletes when we allow 150 pound linebackers to go up against 260 pound linemen in freshman football on a daily basis. Let kids play with their friends.”
12561101622
Reposted by Michael Black
Hypervisible @hypervisible.blacksky.app · 09/09/2026
From The Crimson editorial board: “…to encourage unfettered use of AI, especially for “writing-intensive” courses, is antithetical to promoting learning and jeopardizes the purpose of a liberal arts education.”
thecrimson.com
Don't Tell Us To Write Our Papers With AI | The Harvard Crimson
It’s still unclear how AI could be used to support academic writing without meaningfully outsourcing one’s thinking. Professors might not be able to enforce a prohibition on its use for larger take-ho...
223088
Michael Black @mblack.us · 09/09/2026
I long for the quiet IRC days of yore
110
Michael Black @mblack.us · 09/09/2026
Every update is somehow worse than the last
000
Reposted by Michael Black
Nathan Grayson @nathangrayson.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
blizzard workers had to fight tooth and nail for years, but they finally did it: they secured a union contract not just for one team, but for all unionized units--warcraft, overwatch, diablo, and more
“We really started mobilizing as one Blizzard unit in [the] last couple of months, and I think that really helped put the pressure on,” Paul Cox, senior game designer on World of Warcraft, told Aftermath.
"I feel like the company dragged its feet and did a lot of posturing and wasting time until the very, very last moment."
Prior to spring of this year, the WoW team, which unionized in 2024, had gotten the lion's share of bargaining time. Other units found themselves stuck in the mud. Higher-ups were effectively stalling the whole process—unfortunately nothing new for unionized workers under Microsoft’s umbrella.
"For this whole year of bargaining on the Diablo side—and I imagine on the rest of the units as well—we received so few [bargaining] dates, but we kind of had the understanding that whatever WoW was able to win would at least influence and set the floor for the rest of our units,” Diablo senior environment artist Mahreen Fatima told Aftermath. “We adopted this messaging about how WoW's wins are our wins, so we should be out there mobilizing with them. But truly, I feel like the company dragged its feet and did a lot of posturing and wasting time until the very, very last moment this last month to finally be able to say, 'OK, yes, we are willing to extend this contract to everyone.' We really did not have any indication that we could get this done until last month."
2765962179
Michael Black @mblack.us · 31/08/2026
And they're always Google reviews! Not private feedback for internal use, but publicly visible ratings/comments that would have my name on them!
090
Reposted by Michael Black
Emily M. Bender @emilymbender.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
New on the MAIHT3k newsletter -- how to move away from the untenable, uncomfortable middle ground and towards firm "AI" resistance. buttondown.com/maiht3k/arch... w/ @deccamuldowney.bsky.social
buttondown.com
Six Problems With Talking About the “Ethical” or “Responsible” Use of “AI”
How to move away from the untenable, uncomfortable middle ground By Emily M. Bender and Decca Muldowney A dancing ledge, as viewed from above. Image: Will...
210540
Reposted by Michael Black
Le Ca-ghoul @lecagle.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
[apparates into your timeline] please note: there are zero (0.0) writing studies researchers involved in this [disappears in a puff of smoke]
112132
Reposted by Michael Black
Jennifer Sano-Franchini @jsanofranchini.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
Sharing this fundraiser for legal support after CCCC--the flagship academic professional organization for the field of rhetoric and composition--was abruptly and unceremoniously "de-chartered" by NCTE gofund.me/05363e2ce
gofund.me
Donate to Help the Undefeated CCCC Chairs and Members Unite, organized by Vay Young
The undefeated CCCC group is a coalition of CCCC chairs and members who ha… Vay Young needs your support for Help the Undefeated CCCC Chairs and Members Unite
2105
Reposted by Michael Black
Matt Pearce @mattdpearce.com · 11/08/2026
I’m learning that the people who gamified paragraphs are having trouble reading books. www.axios.com/2026/08/11/r...

AXIOS

Al has become my reading buddy as I've plowed through my summer book list, helping me keep track of plots and characters, unpack themes, and make sense of wordy, old prose.
• Why it matters: The way many of us actually read books - a few pages before bed, a chapter at the beach, another on a plane - makes it easy to lose the thread. Al can help you pick it back up without starting over.
Ш I really got into using Al while reading James Fenimore Cooper's "The Last of the Mohicans." The text was far too dense for casual vacation reading. My first prompt asked:
• "T'd like a guide as I read The Last of the Mohicans who can help me understand what I've read and where the story is, without giving spoilers or getting ahead of my progress. Can you do this, chapter by chapter?"
• The robot agreed: "Cooper's sentences are long and his diction is archaic."
3083500541
Reposted by Michael Black
Chris B-Eeeeek!-ler 👻 @cwbuecheler.com · 06/08/2026
I would like to see more companies admit this - being a public company no longer means running a successful, thriving business. It strictly means delivering growth to investors, every single quarter, who do not care at all about the product the company sells or the people who produce it.
6062991901
Reposted by Michael Black
Alondra Nelson @alondra.bsky.social · 06/08/2026
Big Tech and AI companies have refined these prior industrial tactics into what I call 'algorithmic agnotology': the exploitation of technical complexity to obscure accountability and naturalize inscrutability as inherent to digital systems.
825271
Reposted by Michael Black
Dan "Mr. Bones and Me" Greene @dmgreene.bsky.social · 02/08/2026
That WIC doesn't pay for diapers should be higher up in this country's big list of crimes
0348
Reposted by Michael Black
Jane Rosenzweig @janerosenzweig.bsky.social · 02/08/2026
From the first piece I published about generative AI (in the Boston Globe a couple of weeks before ChatGPT was released in 2022). Full text outside paywall here: writinghacks.substack.com/p/what-we-lo...
I tell my students that writing — in the classroom, in your journal, in a memo at work — is a way of bringing order to our thinking or of breaking apart that order as we challenge our ideas. We look at the evidence around us. We consider ideas we disagree with. And we try to bring a shape to it all. Sometimes my students see the process differently. They see writing a paper as a hoop they are being asked to jump through, a way for me to evaluate them and pronounce them successful or not. In other words, they see writing solely as a product. If the end point rather than the process were indeed all that mattered, then there might be good reason to turn to GPT-3. But if, as I believe is the case, we write to make sense of the world, then the risks of turning that process over to AI are much greater.

There are many ominous science fiction stories about what might happen if we are defeated by our own machines. But the evidence suggests that rather than being conquered by machines run amok, we’re willingly outsourcing too many processes to them, including writing. And since GPT-3 isn’t actually thinking, no one will be thinking. Perhaps the most worrying outcome is that we will lose our commitment to the idea that we ought to believe what we say and write — an idea that is already under threat from disinformation campaigns and the speed at which social media moves.
04215
Michael Black @mblack.us · 29/07/2026
If AT&T has it, I would definitely try reaching out to them. I had a really good exchange with archivist at IBM when I was asking for permission to use an ad I copied from a magazine. They not only gave me permission but sent me a high quality scan of the original.
110
Reposted by Michael Black
Megan McIntyre @rcmeg.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
Imagine the conversation we could have about this travesty if NCTE didn’t require Cs officers and executive committee members to sign confidentiality agreements. Folks should also ask NCTE about how and whether their lucrative grant/partnership with Google was part of what Cs “culture” threatened.
insidehighered.com
NCTE Dissolves 77-Year-Old Composition Association
The National Council of Teachers of English’s decision was met with swift backlash from Conference on College Composition and Communication members, who say their organization is vital to advancing co...
33925
Reposted by Michael Black
Jed Brown @jedbrown.org · 28/07/2026
New investigation from AI Forensics finds HuggingFace Spaces (which are subsidized) for "Image Editing" are primarily used to generate non-consensual intimate imagery of non-celeb real people, including CSAM, and lack even cursory "guardrails" (which are a scam). aiforensics.org/uploads/NCII...
Executive summary
As the EU moves toward banning nudification applications, we assess how
Hugging Face, the dominant open-source AI hosting platform, contributes to
the risk of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII), revealing:
I. the near absence of safeguards deployed on Hugging Face’s “Spaces"
II. the capabilities of the models powering them
III. the apparent high prevalence of NCII in Hugging Face users’ usage.

73% of users' prompts are sexual
94% target (mostly ordinary) women
~4.5% involve minors
Only 3% of the most-liked media "Spaces" verify whether the generated content is explicit.
7/9 of the top-ranked Image Editing "Spaces" allow users to undress individuals with simple prompts E.g., "same pose, same face, topless"
332496